Mean (standard deviation)
*Independent t-test, ** fisher exact test
The mean score of marital intimacy was 76.20 (13.17) in the control group and 78.86 (7.78) in the intervention group. Although the mean score of the experimental group was higher than the control, the difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.34) (Table (Table3 3 ).
Comparison between intra-group and intra-group marital intimacy of women before and after the intervention
Variable | intervenion group Mean (standard deviation) | control group Mean (Standard deviation) | Mean difference (CI 95%) | statistics | -value* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before intervention | 75.6 (10.63) | 75.76 (13.29) | 0.16 (−6.05, 6.38) | 0.05 | 0.95 |
After the intervention | 78.86 (7.78) | 76.20 (13.17) | −2.66 (−8.27, 2.94) | −0.95 | 0.34 |
−3.26 (−5.89, − 0.64) | −0.43 (−1.82, 0.96) | ||||
statistics | −2.54 | −0.63 | |||
-value** | 0.01 | 0.53 |
*Independent t-test, ** Paired t-test
By adjusting the pre-intervention scores, infertility duration, the mean score of female intimacy after intervention was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group ( P = 0.009) (Table (Table4 4 ).
Comparison of marital intimacy scores of women in the control and test groups
Variable | Adjusted mean (sd)* | Mean difference (CI 95%) | F | -value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention group | 79.4 (4.96) | 3.74 (0.95, 6.52) | 7.29 | 0.009 |
control group | 75.66 (4.96) |
*adjust of scores before intervention, duration of infertility ** ANCOVA test
The results of Table 5 showed that the mean score of marital intimacy in the intervention group was higher than the control group (78.9 (9.79) and 77.7 (9.42), respectively) but this difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.63) (Table (Table5 5 ).
Comparison between intra-group and intra-group marital intimacy of men before and after the intervention
Variable | intervenion group Mean (standard deviation) | control group Mean (Standard deviation) | Mean difference (CI 95%) | statistics | -value* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before intervention | 78.93 (10.21) | 77.03 (9.6) | 2.55 (−7.02, 3.22) | −0.74 | 0.46 |
After the intervention | 78.9 (9.79) | 77.7 (9.42) | 2.48 (−6.16, 3.76) | −0.48 | 0.63 |
0.03 (−1.41, 1.47) | −0.66 (− 1.51, 0.17) | ||||
statistics | 0.04 | −1.61 | |||
-value** | 0.96 | 0.11 |
By adjusting the pre-intervention scores, infertility duration, the mean score of male intimacy in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group after the intervention, but the difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.54) (Table (Table6 6 ).
Comparison of male marital intimacy scores in control and experimental groups
Variable | Adjusted mean (sd)* | Mean difference (CI 95%) | F | -value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention group | 78.59 (3.46) | −0.58 (−2.51, 1.34) | 0.37 | 0.54 |
This study aimed to investigate the effect of couple-centered counseling by the Gottman method on the intimacy of infertile couples in Hamadan. The analysis results revealed a statistically significant difference between infertile women participating in the control and intervention groups. In other words, there was a significant difference between women who received training and women who had no training. Also, Gottman couple therapy has been effective in the marital intimacy of infertile women. According to the results of statistical analysis and comparison of the average intimacy scores in men in the post-intervention stage, it is inferred that Gottman-centered couple counseling has some effect on the marital intimacy of infertile men.
Infertility is an important stressor in a couple’s life as it is very difficult to accept failure in pregnancy. In this respect, many couples experience a recurring treatment without progress, and a feeling of weakness in achieving the goal (childbearing) appears in them. Although infertility is not a disease, it can cause significant emotional disturbances. This problem leaves many psychological and social complications and delays and interferes with various aspects of the couple’s performance, including sexual activity, self-confidence, and emotional communication [ 28 ]. Experience of painstaking treatments and feelings of rejection, fatigue, confusion, and despair are among the cases that infertile couples face. All of these factors can affect the couple’s emotional connection and, therefore, their success in treatment [ 29 ].
Intimacy is an important human need and a dynamic process with internal roots based on mutual trust and respect. In this regard, clinical studies have shown that the root of many marital problems is the lack of intimacy between couples. With the help of his seven principles, John Gottman describes how a marital relationship succeeds or fails. This scholar also offers ways to facilitate change in these relationships through educational, psychological, preventative, and therapeutic interventions. These solutions, called the Seven Principles of Success in Marriage, determine the extent to which couples maintain their friendship, intimacy, and passion [ 30 ]. The goal of Gottman couple therapy is primarily to help couples rebuild and strengthen friendships with each other [ 17 ] and ultimately lead to proper intimacy and interpersonal growth [ 18 ]. In addition, Gottman couple therapy helps couples learn that there are differences between them. The therapy asserts that these differences are not indelible, and couples must learn to adapt to these persistent problems [ 20 ].
Gottman considered the following seven principles to achieve the goal: designing a love plan, cultivating love and admiration, turning to each other instead of avoiding each other, accepting the spouse’s influence, solving solvable problems, overcoming permanent problems, and creating common meaning. He also used strategies such as gratitude, early marriage memories, and an emotional bank account to increase intimacy and love between couples [ 30 ], which we also relied on in the educational package videos.
The results of this study are consistent with those of Soheili et al. (2020), who showed that group counseling based on Gottman couple therapy has a positive effect on marital intimacy in female nurses [ 23 ]. Likewise, Mortazavi et al. (2020) concluded that the relationship prevention and improvement program based on the combined approach of Gottman and Glasser is effective in marital intimacy [ 28 ].
The present study’s findings are also consistent with those of Sehat et al. (2021). These researchers reported that combination therapy based on emotion and solution is effective in marital intimacy and marital adjustment and can reduce hostile, reprehensible, and domineering behaviors and communication problems, thereby improving intimacy in conflicting couples [ 31 ]. Zarei et al. (2018) examined the effectiveness of group counseling based on choice theory and Gottman’s theory on marital intimacy and marital conflicts in married women. They eventually concluded that group counseling based on Gottman’s theory significantly increases intimacy and reduces conflict [ 32 ], which is in line with our findings.
The findings of the present study are opposed to those of Besharat Ghara Maleki (2021), who reported that counseling in the method of forgiveness therapy is ineffective in the marital intimacy of couples with emotional divorce [ 33 ]. Also, these results are inconsistent with those of Arabpour (2012), who proposed the Glaser theory is ineffective in improving the intimate relationship of couples [ 34 ].
The present study showed that couple-centered counseling as an easy and low-cost method increased marital intimacy among infertile women. In fact, couple-centered counseling is a supportive and solution-based approach that aims to identify problems, suggest appropriate solutions, and ultimately encourage people to change their behavior. This approach covers all components effective in interpersonal relationships. Since couple-centered education is much more effective than educating women alone, many studies have suggested considering the role of education and counseling in future research.
Based on the study results, it can be stated that Gottman places great emphasis on love and respect to deal with the negative aspects of marriage. In the Gottman curriculum, effective communication skills training can help couples establish an effective relationship for growth and prosperity and reduce the persistence of negative and destructive feelings during the marital relationship. Infertile couples may experience more emotional distress and divorce due to the stress of not having a child. However, Gottman’s method helps increase the desire to continue the marital relationship, reduce marital incompatibility and conflict, and provide more intimacy and satisfaction for couples [ 23 ].
When women in couple-centered counseling sessions received various training along with related exercises to reach the seven Gottman principles, all of this helped them feel more intimate with their husbands. In counseling sessions, familiarity with conflict resolution and effective communication skills helped couples realize that some problems in their marital relationship may never be resolved, and they need to learn how to deal with and manage conflict. The couple realized that establishing an effective relationship with their spouse could better understand each other’s needs and wants. Accordingly, the degree of intimacy between them would increase. Also, in these sessions, couples were introduced with four incorrect communication patterns called four riders: criticism, insult and humiliation, defensiveness, and the formation of a stone wall. They received explanations about these four factors’ destructive and negative impacts on marital relationships and learned how to replace correct behavior with behavior.
Overall, Gottman’s counseling taught couples, especially infertile women, that they could more easily deal with many of their problems, such as infertility, by creating a common sense, thus increasing marital intimacy among women. Intimate relationships and better communication patterns of these couples can go through the stages of infertility treatment better than before.
Unlike most interventional studies that focus on training women, the counseling sessions in the present study were based on couples’ relationships and Gottman’s counseling content. Another strength of our work was the preparation of Gottman’s counseling package (counseling videos and practicing the sessions) and its presentation to couples, in addition to face-to-face counseling sessions.
One limitation of our work was the absence of a psychologist in counseling sessions. We resolved this issue by referring the couples to a psychologist upon their request after the last counseling session. Another limitation was the small number of samples due to time constraints, which reduces its generalize ability to the whole community.
Furthermore, the non-cooperation of some men to participate in counseling sessions slowed down the sampling rate. Therefore, we held online counseling sessions for some of them. Besides, some others were excluded from the study due to creating problems in emotional communication.
The results of this study revealed that Gottman’s counseling is significantly effective in increasing marital intimacy in women and to some extent in men. It is, therefore, recommended to use it in infertility centers to increase marital intimacy because it increases the quality of life and leads to success in infertility treatments. Moreover, training counseling skills such as Gottman’s counseling to midwifery students and healthcare staff, especially midwives working in the infertility ward, will help this group benefit from the positive effect of interventions on mental health and better emotional communication between couples.
The Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, esteemed professors, staff of the infertility ward of Fatemieh Teaching Hospital, participants and other people who helped us in this study are deeply appreciated.
GATHER | Include 6 steps including greeting and introduction (Greeting), interacting with people and asking open questions about their problems (Ask), giving useful information (Tell), helping people to choose the best solution (Help), encouraging communication improvement Explain topics that are not clear (Explain) and finally follow up and receive feedback and, if necessary, plan for a return visit (Return) |
MH, SZM Conceptualize, design and direct the study. MH collected information. FK has analyzed the data. FS and MA participated in writing the article and all authors have read, commented, and approved the final manuscript.
This project was funded by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. The budget was spent on sampling and conducting the study (NO,9909046166).
Declarations.
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences under code (IR.UMSHA.REC.1399.535). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mehrnoosh Hosseinpoor, Email: [email protected] .
Seyedeh Zahra Masoumi, Email: moc.liamg@1002dimarhaz .
Farideh Kazemi, Email: moc.oohay@12imezakhediraf .
Farzaneh Soltani, Email: moc.oohay@8002inatloshenazraf .
Mohammad Ahmadpanah, Email: moc.liamg@0002damha1M .
In awake mice, researchers found that even low stimulation currents could sometimes still cause electrographic seizures
The idea of electrically stimulating a brain region called the central thalamus has gained traction among researchers and clinicians because it can help arouse subjects from unconscious states induced by traumatic brain injury or anesthesia, and can boost cognition and performance in awake animals. But the method, called CT-DBS, can have a side effect: seizures. A new study by researchers at MIT and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) who were testing the method in awake mice, quantifies the probability of seizures at different stimulation currents and cautions that they sometimes occurred even at low levels.
“Understanding production and prevalence of this type of seizure activity is important because brain stimulation-based therapies are becoming more widely used,” said co-senior author Emery N. Brown, Edward Hood Taplin Professor of Medical Engineering and Computational Neuroscience in The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and the Center for Brains Minds and Machines (CBMM) at MIT.
In the brain, the seizures associated with CT-DBS occur as “electrographic seizures” which are bursts of voltage among neurons across a broad spectrum of frequencies. Behaviorally, they manifest as “absence seizures” in which the subject appears to take on a blank stare and freezes for about 10-20 seconds.
In their study, the researchers were hoping to determine a CT-DBS stimulation current— in a clinically relevant range of under 200 microamps—below which seizures could be reliably avoided.
In search of that ideal current, they developed a protocol of starting brief bouts of CT-DBS at 1 microamp and then incrementally ramping the current up to 200 microamps until they found a threshold where an electrographic seizure occurred. Once they found that threshold, then they tested a longer bout of stimulation at the next lowest current level in hopes that an electrographic seizure wouldn’t occur. They did this for a variety of different stimulation frequencies. To their surprise, electrographic seizures still occurred 2.2 percent of the time during those longer stimulation trials (i.e. 22 times out of 996 tests) and in 10 out of 12 mice. At just 20 microamps, mice still experienced seizures in 3 out of 244 tests, a 1.2 percent rate.
“This is something that we needed to report because this was really surprising,” said co-lead author Francisco Flores, a research affiliate in The Picower Institute and CBMM, and an instructor in anesthesiology at MGH where Brown is also an anesthesiologist. Isabella Dalla Betta, a technical associate in The Picower Institute, co-led the study published in Brain Stimulation .
Stimulation frequency didn’t matter for seizure risk but the rate of electrographic seizures increased as the current level increased. For instance, it happened in 5 out of 190 tests at 50 microamps, and 2 out of 65 tests at 100 microamps. The researchers also found that when an electrographic seizure occurred, it did so more quickly at higher currents than at lower levels. Finally, they also saw that seizures happened more quickly if they stimulated the thalamus on both sides of the brain vs. just one side. Some mice exhibited behaviors similar to absence seizure, though others became hyperactive.
It is not clear why some mice experienced electrographic seizures at just 20 microamps while two mice did not experience the seizures even at 200. Flores speculated that there may be different brain states that change the predisposition to seizures amid stimulation of the thalamus. Notably, seizures are not typically observed in humans who receive CT-DBS while in a minimally conscious state after a traumatic brain injury or in animals who are under anesthesia. Flores said the next stage of the research would aim to discern what the relevant brain states may be.
In the meantime, the study authors wrote, “EEG should be closely monitored for electrographic seizures when performing CT-DBS, especially in awake subjects.”
The paper’s co-senior author is Matt Wilson, Sherman Fairchild Professor in The Picower Institute, CBMM, and the departments of Biology and Brain and Cognitive Sciences. In addition to Dalla Betta, Flores, Brown and Wilson, the study’s other authors are John Tauber, David Schreier, and Emily Stephen.
Support for the research came from The JPB Foundation, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, George J. Elbaum (MIT ‘59, SM ‘63, PhD ‘67), Mimi Jensen, Diane B. Greene (MIT, SM ‘78), Mendel Rosenblum, Bill Swanson, annual donors to the Anesthesia Initiative Fund; and the National Institutes of Health.
Method enables fast, accurate estimates of cardiovascular state to inform blood pressure management.
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Parametric optimization study of novel winglets for transonic aircraft wings.
Padmanathan, P.; Aswin, S.; Satheesh, A.; Kanna, P.R.; Palani, K.; Devi, N.R.; Sobota, T.; Taler, D.; Taler, J.; Węglowski, B. Parametric Optimization Study of Novel Winglets for Transonic Aircraft Wings. Appl. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 7483. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177483
Padmanathan P, Aswin S, Satheesh A, Kanna PR, Palani K, Devi NR, Sobota T, Taler D, Taler J, Węglowski B. Parametric Optimization Study of Novel Winglets for Transonic Aircraft Wings. Applied Sciences . 2024; 14(17):7483. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177483
Padmanathan, Panneerselvam, Seenu Aswin, Anbalagan Satheesh, Parthasarathy Rajesh Kanna, Kuppusamy Palani, Neelamegam Rajan Devi, Tomasz Sobota, Dawid Taler, Jan Taler, and Bohdan Węglowski. 2024. "Parametric Optimization Study of Novel Winglets for Transonic Aircraft Wings" Applied Sciences 14, no. 17: 7483. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177483
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Receive therapy from a skilled, compassionate, highly-trained therapist.
Are you currently looking for a Certified Gottman Couples Therapist to use research-based approaches to help your relationship?
The Gottman Institute is seeking couples to participate in an international outcome study on Gottman Method Couples Therapy.
You will be able to work with a skilled, compassionate Certified Gottman Therapist either online via HIPAA compliant telehealth or in-person. Your participation in this study will not only help your relationship, it will also help us understand what couples are experiencing today in our post-COVID-19 world and what helps couples cultivate a healthier relationship in couples therapy.
Session costs:.
While all of the studies Dr. Gottman did during his tenure as a professor were funded with federal grants, funding for research on couple relationships is not currently available. Despite this, we still believe work needs to be done. As part of your participation in this study, we are asking you to pay the Certified Gottman Therapist session fee. We wish we could provide treatment to couples in our studies at no cost and pay the therapists providing these services. We simply don’t have the funds to do so.
We do provide some financial help to couples and therapists by providing all assessment questionnaires at no charge. Couples will meet with a Certified Gottman Therapist and receive access to the new Gottman Connect assessment and an interpretation of the results that your therapist will go over with you. This is an average savings of $450.
Additionally, we are fortunately able to provide compensation for the time it takes to fill out the questionnaires for our study. You will be required to fill out three or four lengthy questionnaires, at the beginning of treatment, at the end of treatment, and six months later. After the final questionnaire is filled out 6 months post-treatment, as a thank you for your time, we are happy to be able to provide one of the following (whichever you prefer and choose after completing the final questionnaire):
We have participating therapists in the following locations.
Both in-person and telehealth options are available.
You may participate in-person with therapist if there if one available near you in one of the cities listed.
You can also opt to see a therapist online via telehealth if you live in any of the states listed (note that you must still work with a therapist who is licensed to practice within the state you live in). Telehealth may be especially convenient if you live quite a ways away from an available city, or if you live in a state for which there are no available therapists practicing in-person.
Alabama | Huntsville |
Alaska | |
Arizona | Carefree, Flagstaff, Scottsdale |
Arkansas | |
California | Alameda, Costa Mesa, Oakland, Pleasanton, San Carlos, San Diego, San Jose, Santa Rosa |
Colorado | Durango, Denver, Fort Collins, Loveland, Parker |
Connecticut | |
District of Columbia | Washington |
Delaware | |
Florida | Jacksonville |
Georgia | Atlanta |
Hawaii | Honolulu, Hilo, Kapaa |
Idaho | Boise |
Illinois | Bannockburn, Buffalo Grove, Deerfield, O’Fallon |
Indiana | Angola |
Iowa | |
Kansas | Overland Park |
Kentucky | Louisville |
Maine | |
Maryland | Baltimore, Lutherville |
Massachusetts | |
Michigan | |
Minnesota | |
Mississippi | |
Missouri | |
Montana | |
Nebraska | Omaha |
Nevada | Las Vegas |
New Hampshire | |
New Jersey | Springfield |
New York | Lee |
North Carolina | Mebane |
North Dakota | |
Ohio | Columbus |
Oklahoma | |
Oregon | Damascus, Happy Valley, Hillsboro, Portland |
Pennsylvania | Bala Cynwyd, Bryn Mawr |
Rhode Island | |
South Carolina | |
Tennessee | Nashville |
Texas | Austin, Fort Worth, Kingwood, League City, San Antonio |
Utah | |
Vermont | |
Virginia | |
Washington | Bellingham, Edmonds, Everett, Mercer Island, Seattle, Vancouver |
West Virginia | |
Wisconsin | |
Wyoming |
Australian Capital Territory (ACT) | Canberra |
Queensland | Brisbane, Carseldine, Gold Coast, Mount Coolum |
South Australia | Adelaide, Glenside |
Netherlands | Amsterdam |
North Holland | Amstelveen |
Scotland | Edinburgh, Glasgow |
United Kingdom | London |
Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
Karnataka | Bengaluru |
Teletherapy available worldwide |
If you have more questions about the study, please contact [email protected] .
Fees depend on location, depending on both the individual Certified Gottman Therapist as well as the length of sessions (e.g. longer 90-minute sessions cost more than shorter sessions). The form should provide an estimate based on your state or country as you fill out the application, and once you apply to participate in the study , we will also inform you of a possible estimate of a range of session rates before we schedule a screening call to share more information about the study. Most therapists charge rates consistent with the average rates in their area.
Yes. Some but not all Certified Gottman Therapists offer a reduced rate for this study. We do offer this to participants who are often marginalized in couples therapy research including BIPOC, LGBTQIA+, low socioeconomic status, disabilities (visible and invisible), etc., to better represent the effectiveness of The Gottman Method for relationships that are not often represented in research. The Gottman Method Couples Therapy has already been established as an Evidence-Based Treamtment for Same-Sex Couples . When responding to the application verification email for the study, please indicate you are interested in the reduced rate.
It depends. Some but not all Certified Gottman Therapists accept insurance. Some therapists who do not are still able to offer a Superbill that you can submit to insurance. We would recommend checking with your provider about what they do cover. When responding to the application verification email for the study, please indicate that you are interested in being connected with a therapist who takes insurance and we will do the best we can to find you one.
The reason we need you to cease individual and/or group therapy is because it would confound the results of the study. If you are seeing an individual therapist, going to family therapy, or group therapy, we would not be able to say with confidence that The Gottman Method Couples Therapy is what improved the relationship and individual wellbeing. For this reason, we ask that you not participate in any other forms of therapy if you choose to participate in this study.
You may resume those services once you complete treatment and the 6-month follow-up period has passed, which is when we send the final assessment and wrap up the study. How long treatment takes it completely up to you and your couples therapist. For clarity, this only applies to talk therapy and similar treatment with a licensed therapist. It is okay for this study to continue to see a psychiatrist for medication management throughout.
There are three parts to our answer based on the current literature regarding research on couples therapy. The current research design was approved by an Institutional Review Board.
Part A: The cost .
Most couples therapy research studies are done in university settings in a controlled environment with the benefit of grant funding to allow the cost of therapy to be free. While there is grant funding in other countries for couples therapy, we have not received funding for this research study because there are no funds offered for couples therapy studies at this time in the United States. Not to mention, with a sample size of 120 couples, by far the largest study on couples therapy to date, that would be a very large grant. Despite this, we feel there is still more research needed. In our part to reduce cost, we do offer the assessments for free which is a $475 value. Some of our Certified Gottman Therapists offer sliding scales and insurance (see the section above).
Part B: The Therapist
Most couples therapy studies are completed in controlled conditions such as a university setting with student therapists under a supervisor who may watch the session live (Christensen, et al., 2005). When a couple sees a therapist in their office, there is no supervisor watching every second of the session. The difference in this study is that the counselors being seen are not students but fully licensed therapists who are specifically trained to work with couples using the Gottman Method.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Gottman Method Couples Therapy with couples seen in typical therapy offices. Previous studies on the effectiveness of couples therapy indicated that interventions need to be stronger to effectively help couples. This study requires that participating therapists be Certified Gottman Therapists. A Certified Gottman Therapist has completed three levels of training in Gottman Method couples therapy, had multiple videos of their work scrutinized by Master Trainer Gottman Therapists, and passed a video review process demonstrating that they can effectively use Gottman interventions with couples. There are currently only 411 of therapists that meet these qualifications in the world. By agreeing to participate as a therapist in this study they have agreed to follow the Gottman Method protocol by using the appropriate interventions at the appropriate time during treatment.
Part C: Efficacy Studies In University Settings Do Not Translate to Real Therapy Offices
The efficacy studies in university settings fail to reproduce similar results in a naturalistic setting such as a typical therapy office (Halford, Pepping, & Petch, 2016). Again, this has to do with supervision as well as the type of therapist being studied.
We also know that the screening procedures of university-based outcome studies often include a population that is only 0.5 standard deviation below the mean, meaning they are slightly unhappy (Gottman & Gottman, 2018). However, many couples starting couples therapy are 2.5 standard deviations below the mean indicating high levels of distress (Gottman et al., 2020). This highlights that the university-based outcome studies don’t include the kinds of couples seen in a typical therapist office. Our data from 40,681 couples starting couples therapy indicate that over 80% of couples about to start therapy have serious problems with both conflict and intimacy (Gottman et al., 2020).
Furthermore, the university based studies on the effectiveness of couples therapy screen out many couples who struggle with substance abuse, bipolar, and personality disorders (Baucom et al., 2009; Christensen et al. 2010.). Our data indicates that these struggles are the norm and we need to learn how to help couples with these challenges in a therapy office.
Baucom, B. R., Atkins, D. C., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, A. (2009). Prediction of response to treatment in a randomized clinical trial of couple therapy: A 2-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 77 (1), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014405
Christensen, A., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, B., & Yi, J. (2010). Marital status and satisfaction five years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 78 (2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018132
Christensen, A., Baucom, D. H., Vu, C. T.-A., & Stanton, S. (2005). Methodologically Sound, Cost-Effective Research on the Outcome of Couple Therapy. Journal of Family Psychology , 19 (1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.6
Gottman, J., & Gottman, J. (2018). The science of couples and family therapy: Behind the scenes at the love lab . W. W. Norton Company, Inc.
Gottman, J. M., Gottman, J. S., Cole, C., & Preciado, M. (2020). Gay, Lesbian, and Heterosexual Couples About to Begin Couples Therapy: An Online Relationship Assessment of 40,681 Couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy , jmft.12395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12395
Halford, W. K., Pepping, C. A., & Petch, J. (2016). The Gap Between Couple Therapy Research Efficacy and Practice Effectiveness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy , 42 (1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12120
Professionals
Related Sites
Sign up for the newsletter tailored to you:
©2024 The Gottman Institute. All Rights Reserved.
Reviewed by Psychology Today Staff
The Gottman Method for Healthy Relationships is a form of couples-based t herapy and education that derives from the relationship research of psychologist John Gottman. For more than 40 years, Gottman identified and tested the elements of an enduring relationship. Gottman and his wife, psychologist Julie Schwartz Gottman, created the clinical treatment framework known as the Gottman Method and launched the Gottman Institute, a center for training, research, and education.
One of the major tenets of the Gottman Method is that couples require five times more positive interactions than negative, as negative emotions, like defensiveness and contempt, hurt a relationship more than positive ones heal. As a result, the therapy focuses on developing the skills and understanding necessary for partners to maintain fondness and admiration, turn toward each other to get their needs met, and manage conflict. It also focuses on how couples can react and repair relations when they do hurt each other.
The Gottman Method is a broad-based treatment that serves all couples, at any age, and in any stage of a relationship.
A 12-year study conducted by Gottman found that while gay and lesbian couples have some distinct dynamics, they are comparable to heterosexual couples in many ways, and would benefit similarly from the Gottman Method.
The method can be applied to many relationship problems but may be particularly useful for couples who are:
All Gottman Method therapy is based on a couple’s patterns of interacting, and partners learn and implement relationship-building and problem-solving skills together.
Couples begin treatment with an assessment process and an overview of what the Gottman Method is. It continues with:
The Gottman Method focuses not only on providing practical skills for managing relationships, but on delivering deeper insight into how the relationship dynamics developed.
The length of treatment depends on the severity of a couple’s challenges. Researchers have studied it using ten sessions as a benchmark, but the duration is ultimately a decision made by the couple and the therapist. In some cases, such as a couple in crisis, treatment is employed intensively over the course of two to four days.
The Gottman Method is built on decades of research and observation into how couples interact. Gottman found that negativity has a strong impact on our brains, and that, unless couples take steps to counteract instances of negativity, they grow apart emotionally. The method identifies and addresses the states of mind and behaviors shown to underlie intimacy and helps partners maintain a positive orientation to each other that can sustain them through upsetting circumstances.
The resulting treatment focuses on the nine components of a healthy relationship, what Gottman calls “The Sound Relationship House.” It includes the following:
Although individual perspectives and wishes are addressed, all therapy sessions in the Gottman Method are conducted with both partners together, and therapists do not privilege secrets.
While many therapists are familiar with and apply principles from Gottman’s relationship research, a certified Gottman Method therapist has completed several rounds of study and training through the Gottman Institute in Seattle.
Sticking up for yourself is no easy task. But there are concrete skills you can use to hone your assertiveness and advocate for yourself.
COMMENTS
In a series of research studies, Dr. Gottman developed new observational coding systems with his colleagues, and the lab applied brand new methods for studying sequences of interaction. They built a device called a "talk table," in which people could interact and also rate how positive or negative their intentions were and how positive or ...
In 1996, the Gottman lab returned to intervention research with Dr. Julie Schwartz Gottman. John and Julie Gottman designed both proximal and distal change studies. In a proximal change study, one intervenes briefly with interventions designed only to make the second of two conflict discussions less divorce-prone.
The Effectiveness of the Gottman Method. There have been three published outcome studies to date with randomized clinical trials on Gottman Method programs. A dismantling study of the two-day The Art and Science of Love workshop with one year follow-up: A component analysis of a brief psycho-educational couples' workshop: one-year follow-up ...
Objective: The present study aimed at examining the effectiveness of Gottman couple therapy on improving marital adjustment and couples' intimacy. Method: This was a semi- experimental study with pretest, post-test, and follow-up assessments. A total of 16 couples (32 individuals) were selected using convenience sampling method considering inclusion- exclusion criteria; they were then randomly ...
In the Gottman scientific research there were three phases. Phase 1: The discovery of reliable patterns of interaction discriminating the "masters" from the "disasters" of relationships. The first phase of John Gottman's research was devoted to the discovery of reliable patterns in observational data. In the research with couples we ...
The Gottman Method is a broad-based treatment that serves all couples, at any age, and in any stage of a relationship. A 12-year study conducted by Gottman found that while gay and lesbian couples ...
Validating the effectiveness of a Gottman method couples therapy intervention, the trust revival method, for affair recovery: A randomized control trial (Publication No. 29320211). [Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University]. ProQuest.
The Gottman Method is based on decades of research. Over more than 40 years, John Gottman has performed hundreds of empirical studies with over 3,000 couples. During that time, he and his colleague Robert Levenson performed a series of longitudinal studies that found that some marriages end in divorce while others succeed due to the way couples ...
In D. K. Carson & M. Casado-Kehoe (Eds.), Case studies in couples therapy: Theory-based approaches (pp. 331-343). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Abstract. This chapter demonstrates application and adaptation of the Gottman method couple therapy with comorbid issues of alcoholism recovery and trauma, and within the framework of other research.
In a series of research studies, I developed new observational coding systems with my student Cliff Notarius, and the lab applied brand new methods for studying sequences of interaction developed by Jim Sackett and Roger Bakeman for examining sequences of interaction. ... Internalize the powerful, research-based Gottman Method Couples Therapy ...
Timeless Tips: The 7 Research-Based Principles for Making Marriage Work. Enhance your love maps. Nurture your fondness and admiration. Turn toward each other instead of away. Let your partner ...
Some approaches—e.g., Gottman method therapy (Gottman & Gottman, 2015, 2017) and Papernow's therapy for stepfamily couples (Papernow, 2018b) propose specific goals of intervention and methods of accomplishing those goals, although the sequence and number of sessions devoted to each goal may be tailored to aspects of the individual partners ...
The predictive power of Gottman's research. ... in seven longitudinal studies, the data held up under scrutiny. Gottman could now predict whether or not a couple would eventually divorce with an astonishing 90% or better accuracy. He was able to stone-cold quantify what many believed was utterly unquantifiable. ... The Gottman Method and ...
Based on 50+ years of science. Measures five key relationship areas: friendship and intimacy, sex and passion, conflict management, shared meaning, and trust and commitment. Designed to analyze your relationship's unique strengths and weaknesses. With an overall relationship satisfaction score. Invite your partner for more detailed results.
John Mordecai Gottman (born April 26, 1942) is an American psychologist and professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Washington.His research focuses on divorce prediction and marital stability through relationship analyses. Insights from Gottman's work have significantly impacted the field of relationship counseling, aiming to enhance relationship functioning and mitigate ...
For therapists, life coaches, counselors, educators, clergy, trainers, and other mental health and well-being professionals, the Gottman Method is an approach to couples therapy that includes a thorough assessment of the couple's relationship, and integrates research-based interventions based on the Sound Relationship House Theory. The goals of Gottman Method Couples Therapy are to disarm ...
Studying Marriage: Gottman's Love Lab and the Four Horsemen of Divorce. Studying relationships and why some work and others don't is a fascinating field of study because it's so relevant for all of us. John Gottman's decades of research has uncovered four "poisonous" factors in a marriage: Criticism, Contempt, Defensiveness, Stonewalling.
Research design and participants. This research is a quasi-experimental study in two groups to investigate the effect of Gottman's couple-centered counseling on marital intimacy in infertile couples visiting the infertility ward of Fatemiyeh Hospital, Hamadan. The study samples included 60 couples with primary infertility and one treatment ...
The present study applies a Gottman Method Couples Therapy (GMCT) intervention, the Trust Revival Method (TRM), to couples' relationships following an affair, using a randomized control waitlist ...
Research FAQ. The following Frequently Asked Questions are drawn from common inquiries about Dr. Gottman's research on couples. The Gottman Institute welcomes the opportunity to share the insight that science can provide the field of relationship study, and we hope these brief responses provide a greater level of detail and depth of ...
The Gottman Method is a broad-based treatment that serves all couples, at any age, and in any stage of a relationship. A 12-year study conducted by Gottman found that while gay and lesbian couples ...
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 43 Vassar Street , Bldg. 46-1303 Cambridge, MA 02139 (+1) 617-324-0305 (+1) 617-452-2588
This paper deals with the topic of reducing drag force acting on aircraft wings by incorporating novel winglet designs, such as multi-tip, bird-type, and twisted. The high-speed NASA common research model (CRM) was selected as the baseline model, and winglet designs were retrofitted while keeping the projected wingspan constant. Computational analysis was performed using RANS coupled with the ...
The Gottman Institute is seeking couples to participate in an international outcome study on Gottman Method Couples Therapy. You will be able to work with a skilled, compassionate Certified Gottman Therapist either online via HIPAA compliant telehealth or in-person. Your participation in this study will not only help your relationship, it will ...
The Gottman Method is a broad-based treatment that serves all couples, at any age, and in any stage of a relationship. A 12-year study conducted by Gottman found that while gay and lesbian couples ...