Discuss the main objectives of Population Education and point out the measures to achieve them in India in detail. (GS Paper 2; UPSC Mains 2021)
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Investing in Persons With Disabilities
A New Vision for Khadi in New India
The Road to 2047 for Indian Agriculture Sector
The Annual Accusation of Board Exam Mark Inflation
Outreach to diaspora and statesmanship, india and the artemis accords, laying the foundation for a future-ready digital india, latest comments, recent editorial.
Reality of Reel Life, Exploitation As a Structural...
Centre announces Unified Pension Scheme: How will ...
News in Shorts: 26 August 2024
Justice J.S. Verma Committee on Dealth Penalty for...
Frequent Mass Wasting
BioE3 (Biotechnology for Economy, Environment and ...
Atacama Salt Flat Sinking from Lithium Mining
India-Singapore Ministerial Roundtable (ISMR)
Learn From India's Best Faculty
Beginner’s roadmap, quick links.
PW-Only IAS came together specifically to carry their individual visions in a mission mode. Infusing affordability with quality and building a team where maximum members represent their experiences of Mains and Interview Stage and hence, their reliability to better understand and solve student issues.
Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
G-Floor,4-B Pusha Road, New Delhi, 110060
Biginner's roadmap.
G-Floor,4-B Pusa Road, New Delhi, 110060
Fill the required details to get early access of quality content..
Join Us Now
(Promise! We Will Not Spam You.)
CURRENT AF.
<div class="new-fform">
Select centre Online Mode Hybrid Mode PWonlyIAS Delhi (ORN) PWonlyIAS Delhi (MN) PWonlyIAS Lucknow PWonlyIAS Patna Other
Select course UPSC Online PSC ONline UPSC + PSC ONLINE UPSC Offline PSC Offline UPSC+PSC Offline UPSC Hybrid PSC Hybrid UPSC+PSC Hybrid Other
</div>
The Indian government has as of late declared another training strategy that will happen in 2023-2024. The goal of this policy is to bring the country’s education system into line with international standards. We will examine the new education policy and its implications in greater detail in this article.
Table of Contents
Background of the new education policy.
The Indian government has taken the initiative to change the country’s education system with its new education policy . In 1986, a new education policy was created, and it was updated in 1992. India’s socioeconomic and cultural landscape has undergone significant shifts over the past few decades, necessitating a revision of the education policy. A committee led by prominent educator Dr. K. Kasturirangan drafted the new policy, which was approved by the Union Cabinet in 2020. The policy aims to bring the Indian education system into line with international standards and address the issues of the 21st century.
The new schooling strategy has a few goals, which are pointed toward changing the school system of India. A portion of the key targets include:
In general, the new policy on education seeks to establish a robust and all-encompassing educational system that equips students for the challenges of the twenty-first century.
Introduction of a new 5+3+3+4 education structure.
One of the critical highlights of the new instruction strategy is the presentation of another 5+3+3+4 design for school training. This structure, which takes the place of the 10+2 structure that is currently in place, aims to provide a more comprehensive and integrated approach to education.
The foundational stage of education focuses on play-based and activity-based learning for the first five years of education (ages 3 to 8). The preparatory stage lasts for three years, from the ages of 8 to 11, and focuses on developing conceptual understanding and higher-order thinking abilities. The middle stage lasts for the next three years when students between the ages of 11 and 14 can choose from a wide range of subjects and participate in extracurricular activities. The final four years, from the ages of 14 to 18, are the secondary stage, where students can choose from a variety of subjects and career paths.
Students will be able to explore their interests and strengths thanks to the new structure, which aims to provide a more adaptable and student-centered approach to education. Additionally, it aims to promote experiential and activity-based learning while reducing the emphasis on rote learning. The new construction is supposed to achieve a change in perspective in the Indian school system and get ready understudies for the difficulties of the 21st 100 years.
The new training strategy perceives that the overemphasis on onboard tests has had adverse results on understudies, like pressure and uneasiness. As a result, it suggests moving away from board exams and toward a more comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to assessment.
Under the new arrangement, understudies will be evaluated on their abilities and capabilities, as well as their scholarly information. The strategy proposes the presentation of a scope of developmental and summative evaluations all through the scholastic year, which will give a more complete image of the understudy’s learning progress. In addition, the policy proposes making board exams only one of several considerations for admission to higher education institutions, lowering the stakes associated with them.
It is anticipated that the focus of education will shift away from rote learning and toward a more holistic and experiential approach as a result of the reduction in the importance of board exams. It is likewise expected to decrease the pressure and tension related with board tests, which have been a main issue for understudies and guardians the same. In general, the goal of putting less emphasis on board exams is to make education more student-centered and inclusive.
The new policy on education acknowledges the significance of vocational education in preparing students for the workforce and fostering economic expansion. As a result, it suggests incorporating vocational education into the standard educational system.
Under the new strategy, professional training will be presented as a different stream in optional schools (grades 9-12) and will be accessible as an elective for understudies in grades 6-8. In order to equip students with skills that are in high demand on the job market, vocational courses will be developed in collaboration with industry professionals.
Students are anticipated to gain practical skills and hands-on training as a result of the integration of vocational education, which will prepare them for the workforce. It is likewise expected to advance business and urge understudies to seek after vocations in fields that line up with their inclinations and assets.
In general, the coordination of professional schooling is a critical stage towards advancing a more comprehensive and comprehensive schooling system that plans understudies for the difficulties of the 21st 100 years. It acknowledges the significance of vocational skills in fostering economic expansion and providing students with opportunities to pursue fulfilling careers.
The new education policy acknowledges the significance of multilingualism in fostering a sense of national unity and cultural diversity. As a result, it suggests that regional languages be taught in schools and that multilingualism be encouraged.
Students will be able to learn three languages under the new policy: English and two Indian languages, one of which must be a regional language. This is pointed toward advancing multilingualism and empowering understudies to foster a more profound comprehension and enthusiasm for various societies.
The proposal to establish a National Institute for Pali, Persian, and Prakrit also acknowledges the significance of promoting regional languages. The purpose of this institute will be to ensure the preservation and promotion of regional languages as well as to encourage research and development in them.
The advancement of multilingualism and provincial dialects is supposed to decidedly affect understudies’ mental turn of events and social mindfulness. It is likewise expected to advance semantic variety and support the safeguarding and advancement of territorial dialects, which are a significant piece of India’s rich social legacy.
By and large, the advancement of multilingualism and local dialects is a huge step towards advancing a more comprehensive and socially different school system that plans understudies for the difficulties of the 21st 100 years.
The new instruction strategy perceives the developing significance of innovation and the requirement for understudies to be furnished with advanced abilities. As a result, it suggests teaching coding as a subject in schools.
Coding will become a subject in secondary school (grades 6–8) and an elective in higher secondary school (grades 9–12) under the new policy. The coding curriculum will be developed in collaboration with industry professionals and will aim to teach students the fundamentals of computer programming and coding.
It is anticipated that the introduction of coding as a subject will improve students’ digital skills and prepare them for the demands of the workforce of the 21st century. Students’ critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and creativity will also benefit from it.
As a whole, the inclusion of coding as a subject is a significant step toward fostering an education system that is more technology-driven and better able to prepare students for the challenges of the digital age. It acknowledges the significance of digital skills in fostering economic expansion and providing students with opportunities to pursue fulfilling careers.
The new education policy acknowledges the transformative potential of technology in enhancing the quality of learning outcomes and expanding access to education. Accordingly, it proposes few computerized schooling drives pointed toward advancing the coordination of innovation in the school system.
The establishment of a National Educational Technology Forum (NETF) is one of the most important initiatives that the new policy calls for. The purpose of this forum will be to develop guidelines and standards for the use of technology in the classroom and to encourage the integration of technology into education.
The policy also suggests improving students’ and teachers’ digital literacy and creating digital infrastructure. This remembers the arrangement of high-velocity web availability for all schools and the improvement of computerized content and e-assets that can be gotten to by understudies and instructors.
Additionally, the policy proposes the creation of a regulatory framework for online education in recognition of its potential. This includes the creation of guidelines and standards for the accreditation of online courses and the establishment of a dedicated body for online education.
In general, the new policy’s digital education initiatives aim to increase access to high-quality education and prepare students for digital age challenges. They perceive the extraordinary capability of innovation in training and the need to coordinate innovation in the study hall to further develop learning results.
Roadmap for execution.
In general, the goal of the new education policy’s implementation roadmap is to ensure that the various policy-proposed initiatives are implemented in a planned and phased manner. It perceives the significance of the partner conference and asset portion in the effective execution of the drives.
Generally, the distribution of assets proposed under the new training strategy is pointed toward guaranteeing that sufficient assets are accessible for the execution of the different drives proposed under the approach. The establishment of the NEFC and an increased allocation of funds are significant initiatives that will contribute to the mobilization of resources and the attraction of private-sector investment in education.
The Federal and State Governments must work together to make the new Education Policy a success. The strategy perceives this and proposes a structure for the job of the focal and state legislatures in the execution of the different drives proposed under the approach.
In general, the central and state governments’ participation in the new education policy’s implementation is crucial. The active participation and coordination of both the federal and state governments are necessary for the successful implementation of the policy’s various initiatives.
A significant step toward reforming India’s educational system is the new education policy for 2023-2024. The main changes to the policy have a number of advantages for students, teachers, and schools, despite some obstacles in their way. It is essential to guarantee that the policy is effectively implemented and that all stakeholders collaborate to achieve its goals.
... your login credentials do not authorize you to access this content in the selected format. Access to this content in this format requires a current subscription or a prior purchase. Please select the WEB or READ option instead (if available). Or consider purchasing the publication.
Education policy outlook 2022.
The annual comparative reports of the Education Policy Outlook monitor the evolution of policy landscapes mainly among the education systems of OECD Countries. The Education Policy Outlook follows the premise that knowledge of education policy is as valuable as the capacity to use it. Covering selected topics from early childhood education to adult education, the reports aim to provide a comparative understanding of how priorities and policies are evolving, and how policies can be best implemented or improved over time in their specific contexts.
The effects of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (with its dramatic impact on energy and food prices), the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic, and extreme weather events in some parts of the world in 2022 are expected to reverberate into 2023. International implications for education and training include economic uncertainty and tight labour markets, ongoing digital transformation, and continued growth and influence of mass information. These trends challenge education policymakers to transform existing pathways in their countries and economies, so people can become effective lifelong learners to navigate change. Building on the OECD’s Framework of Responsiveness and Resilience in Education Policy, as well as analysis of international policies and practices from over 40 education systems implemented mainly since 2020, this report identifies three areas of policy effort that education policymakers can undertake in 2023: 1) enhancing the relevance of learning pathways; 2) easing transitions throughout learners’ pathways; and 3) nurturing learners’ aspirations. Lessons emerging from recent policy efforts are synthesised into key policy pointers for 2023. The report has been prepared with evidence from the Education Policy Outlook series—the OECD’s analytical observatory of education policy.
21 Nov 2022 126 pages English
https://doi.org/10.1787/c77c7a97-en 9789264345638 (PDF) 9789264563957 (EPUB)
Author(s): OECD
See other content on.
The National Council For Education, Research, and Training(NCERT) recently released the NCF. The National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF) was developed to facilitate the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
The first NCF was released in 1986, followed by revisions in 2000, 2005, and 2020. The modifications of the NCF have taken into account the changing educational landscape, such as new developments in academic research and technology, changing social and economic contexts, and the evolving needs of students and society.
The pre-draft of NCF 2023 is the latest one, with a few amendments aligning with the NEP’s vision, like change in board exams for 10 and 12 and assessment patterns for 3 to 8 classes.
The NCF 2023 addresses education for children from 3 to 18 years old across all Indian school system . It applies to all four Stages of the NEP 2020-envisioned 5+3+3+4 Curricular and Pedagogical Restructuring of School Education. This NCF draft focuses on the developmental perspectives, adopting different teaching methods, and curriculum changes at four different learning stages: Foundational, Preparatory, Middle, and Secondary levels.
National Education Policy 2020 and NCF
The National Education Policy 2020 (NEP 2020) aims to devise four National Curriculum Frameworks (NCFs):
The fundamental principles of the National Curriculum Framework are:
Holistic Development: The NCF 2023 emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to education that promotes the overall development of students. It could include developing students’ physical, emotional, social, and cognitive skills.
Inclusivity: The NCF 2023 is likely to prioritize the creation of an inclusive education system that caters to the needs of all students, including those from marginalized communities. It may guide the creation of a safe and inclusive school environment free from discrimination and bias.
Interdisciplinary Learning: The NCF 2023 may advocate for multidisciplinary learning that integrates , different subject areas and encourages students to make connections between them. It could help students to develop a broader understanding of the world and prepare them for the complexities of the 21st century.
Competency-Based Education: The NCF 2023 may focus on competency-based education, emphasizing developing skills and competencies rather than mere knowledge acquisition. It could include a focus on critical thinking, creativity, communication, and problem-solving skills.
Use of Technology: The NCF 2023 may emphasize the importance of technology in education and guide how to integrate technology into teaching and learning. It could include using digital resources for teaching and learning and technology for assessments and evaluation.
Listen and communicate: Take the time to listen to your child and have regular conversations with them. Be ready to offer advice and assistance and express interest in their ideas and feelings.
Development of curriculum: One of the NCF’s main goals is to offer a framework for curriculum development. The curriculum should be meaningful, relevant, and tailored to the specific requirements of the learners, according to the framework.
Development of pedagogy: The NCF acknowledges the importance of excellent pedagogy in fostering an inclusive and all-encompassing atmosphere for learning. To encourage active learning, student-centered teaching, and interactive instruction, the framework strives to design pedagogical strategies like 5+3+3+4.
Assessment: The NCF tries to provide assessment procedures that are fair, honest, and relevant because it understands how critical assessment is to the learning process. The framework promotes formative assessment , which gives learners input to help their development.
Teacher development: The NCF knows teachers’ crucial contribution to creating a good learning environment. As a result, the framework attempts to create programs for teacher training that give educators the knowledge, abilities, and perspectives they require.
Now we will focus on the NCF draft proposals for students who want to acquire knowledge.
Up to Grade 2:
The NCF draft proposes that written exams and assessment tools are the perfect media for calculating the kid’s knowledge.
At the Foundational Stage, go with the two simple methods. One observes the child , and the other analyzes the areas developed as part of their learning process.
Preparatory Stage(Grade 3-5):
It is the Preparatory Stage , and the NCF draft proposes introducing the written tests as part of the knowledge evolution pattern. Also, conduct summative assessments to know if the child is prepared for the next class.
Middle Stage(Grade 6-8)
As per the NCF draft, grade 6-8 is the Middle Stage and critical to prepare students for the following secondary stage.
Here the curriculum focuses on conceptual abilities like projects, experiments, databases, role-play, and investigations. Conduct periodic assent to synthesize their knowledge at year-end, mid-term, and unit-end.
Secondary Stage(Grade 9-12)
There are 16 essential courses for both grades 9 and 10. Each grade with 8 basic courses. Students need to complete 2 of the essential courses from the 8 essential courses.
For grades 9 and 10, semester structured patterns are followed. By the end of grade 10, students must complete apparent grade 8, which shows that they have dutifully completed the 2 essential courses during grades 9 and 10.
Grade 11-12:
For grades 11 and 12, 8 choice-based curricular course areas will be shown based on the disciplines. Here the exam pattern is semester-based, and students must complete 16 choice-based courses to complete grade 12 successfully.
When will the changes come into effect?
NCF signifies a substantial movement toward a more adaptable, learner-centered, and inclusive approach to education. It offers a thorough foundation for curriculum design and instructional techniques in Indian education schoolls all over India. It considers the shifting demands of students and society in the twenty-first century.
Moreover the proposals outlined in the NPE 2020 and the proposed NCF 2023 display a remarkable level of vision and consideration. However, the success of these initiatives ultimately depends on the commitment and actions of the various stakeholders involved. Given that our country is home to one of the world’s largest youth populations, it is disheartening to note that our current employability rate stands at a mere 50%. The introduction of these new initiatives holds tremendous potential to bring about the necessary changes in the coming years. However, it will take at least one academic year, when these changes are fully implemented, to accurately assess their true impact. To read the official document of NCF 2023, Click Here.
For more education news and updates, click here .
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Copyright © 2023
Janmashtami Quotes, Wishes in Hindi 2024: इस श्री कृष्ण जन्माष्टमी अपनों को भेजें ये प्रेम और आस्था से भरे हार्दिक शुभकामनाएं संदेश
क्यों चर्चाओं में हैं BHISHM क्यूब्स, जानें
UPSC CDS 2024 Last Week Revision Tips: Check Subject-wise Strategy and Preparation
SSC Stenographer Previous Year Question Paper, Download PDF
Optical Illusion: Only 2% with high IQ can spot the number 79 in 5 seconds!
UPUMS Recruitment 2024 Notification for 82 Non Teaching Group C Vacancies
उत्तर प्रदेश के किस जिले में है रजा लाइब्रेरी, जानें
NABARD Grade A Admit Card 2024 Out at nabard.org: Download Assistant Manager Call Letter
ICC Women’s T20 World Cup 2024: किसका बदला कप्तान, कौन हुआ बाहर, सभी टीमों की फुल स्क्वॉड यहां देखें
Difference Between North Pole and South Pole
Maharashtra Becomes First State to Adopt Unified Pension Scheme: Who Will Benefit From This Decision?
Top 5 Govt Jobs of the Day-Aug 26, 2024: Apply Online for 1050+ Assistant Manager, Engineer, Faculty, Peon and other Jobs
MHT CET Counselling 2024 CAP Round 2 Provisional Allotment Out, Download at cetcell.mahacet.org
NBA Summer League 2024: Full Schedule, TV Broadcast Schedule, Live Streaming and More
Inland Waterways IWAI Recruitment 2024 Out, Apply Online for 37 Various Posts
JKSSB Patwari Admit Card 2024 OUT at jkssb.nic.in: Download SSBJK Call Letter
TNDALU Admission 2024: TNDALU LLM Seat Allotment Result Out at tndalu.ac.in; Check Fee Structure
NCERT Books for Class 10 Social Science PDF (2024-2025)
CBSE Class 10 Science Syllabus 2024-25 with Exam Pattern: Download PDF Here
CBSE Class 10 Maths Syllabus 2024-2025 with Weightage Distribution and Question Paper Design; Download PDF
26 Aug, 2024 | 9:09 PM IST
Current Size: 100%
Institutions.
Content of this website is owned and managed by D/o Higher Education, Ministry of Education. This site is designed, developed, hosted and maintained by National Informatics Centre (NIC), Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India. Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved.
Supports: Firefox 2.0+ Google Chrome 6.0+ Internet Explorer 8.0+ Safari 4.0+
Office of the Professions
What is the Culminating Project?
Students may demonstrate the required level of proficiency for the New York State Seal of Biliteracy (NYSSB) in English and/or a world language by completing and presenting a Culminating Project, which can take the form of project, a scholarly essay, or a portfolio. The Culminating Project, when successfully completed and presented, may earn the student two (2) points for criterion 1E (English) and/or 2E (world languages) of the NYSSB.
What level of proficiency must a student demonstrate to satisfy the Culminating Project criteria?
Through the Culminating Project and Presentation, students must demonstrate the required level of proficiency based on the language of the project.
How is the Culminating Project presented?
Culminating Projects are presented by the student in the language being assessed to a panel of at least two qualified adult speakers of the language. Panelists may include classroom teachers, other faculty and staff, and community members. Students present their projects and then the panel interviews the students in the language being assessed.
How is the Culminating Project and Presentation evaluated?
Projects are evaluated using a rubric that is aligned with ACTFL proficiency levels. NYSED has created sample rubrics in English for each of the language categories that schools may use to evaluate student work.
The suggested NYSSB Culminating Project rubrics are also available in the following languages:
School-Developed Rubrics
Alternatively, schools may develop their own rubrics, which must be submitted to NYSED for approval with the NYSSB School Notification Form in December of each year. In order to be approved, school-based rubrics must meet the criteria established by NYSED based on the following essential questions:
Rubric used by NYSED to evaluate school-based rubrics
Subscribe to receive news and updates from the New York State Education Department.
New York State Education Building
89 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12234
NYSED General Information: (518) 474-3852
ACCES-VR: 1-800-222-JOBS (5627)
High School Equivalency: (518) 474-5906
New York State Archives: (518) 474-6926
New York State Library: (518) 474-5355
New York State Museum: (518) 474-5877
Office of Higher Education: (518) 486-3633
Office of the Professions: (518) 474-3817
P-12 Education: (518) 474-3862
Adult Education & Vocational Services
New York State Archives
New York State Library
New York State Museum
Office of Higher Education
Office of Education Policy (P-20)
© 2015 - 2024 New York State Education Department
Diversity & Access | Accessibility | Internet Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Terms of Use
The Education Department has issued $61.7 million in fines and cut off aid to 35 colleges for violations since 2021. Some critics say it hasn’t gone far enough in holding rule breakers accountable; others say the feds have a “vendetta” against career colleges.
By Katherine Knott
You have / 5 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in.
A for-profit college based in Washington, D.C., that offered IT and health-care programs shut down in May 2023 after the Education Department cut it off from federal financial aid—one of 35 institutions in the last three years that have lost access to the funding source that’s a lifeline for most colleges.
But the department didn’t say anything publicly about its decision to take action against Prospect College after it found evidence of an "illegal scheme” to evade the so-called 90-10 rule. Under that rule, only 90 percent of a for-profit college’s revenue can come from federal financial aid. Prospect counted institutional payments to students as revenue to the college to keep its federal revenue under 90 percent, and when the department recalculated the college’s revenue for fiscal 2019, 2020 and 2021, the college failed the 90-10 standard all three years.
The department’s Jan. 31, 2023, finding against Prospect was disclosed along with dozens of others earlier this month, when the department released information about its enforcement efforts on a new webpage that will serve as the hub for future fines, settlements and termination actions. It is now public knowledge that the Office of Enforcement at Federal Student Aid, the agency within the Education Department that oversees the federal financial aid system, has taken 87 actions in all against 85 colleges and universities over the past three years.
The disclosures are part of a new effort to increase transparency into the enforcement office’s work since it was revived by the Biden administration. Some of its more high-profile decisions have been released through press announcements, such as a $37 million fine against the online giant Grand Canyon University issued last October, but the majority have flown under the radar till now. (Most recently, the Education Department fined the Culinary Institute LeNotre $275,000 as part of a settlement agreement after finding that the Texas-based for-profit college misrepresented the employability of its graduates.)
This glimpse into the enforcement office’s work comes as the department is conducting an overhaul of Federal Student Aid—and with a presidential election on the horizon that could shake up the agency. The office, which was first created in the last year of the Obama administration, has been subject to political whims. Under the Trump administration, it was “deprioritized,” according to current Education Department officials who re-established it in October 2021.
Headed up by Kristen Donoghue, a former enforcement director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the office investigates potential misconduct, analyzes claims for debt relief from students who say they were defrauded and fines institutions, among other responsibilities.
“We investigate schools that are suspected of wrongdoing and take actions to hold schools accountable when we find evidence,” Donoghue said. “We want to ensure that schools do not put their interests ahead of students’ interests, and we are confident that the actions we take to hold schools accountable protect taxpayers who fund postsecondary education in addition to students.”
Over all, since October 2021, the office has issued 39 fines totaling $61.7 million and reached settlements with eight colleges, while yanking federal financial aid eligibility from nearly three dozen. It’s impossible to say how much of a stepped-up effort that represents, since the webpage doesn’t include enforcement actions under the Trump or Obama administrations. But department officials hope that the disclosures will be helpful for institutions who want to comply with federal rules and regulations—and will inform students and families as they think about which college to attend and which ones to steer clear of.
The latter category might include McDougle Technical Institute, which lost access to federal financial aid on Dec. 30, 2022.
The small Florida-based for-profit, which offers programs in cosmetology, barbering and massage therapy, showed a “callous disregard” for its students’ welfare, the department found. The college was accused of falsifying student attendance, disbursing federal financial aid to ineligible students, failing to give COVID relief funds to students and pressuring students to take out loans. In some cases, students were unaware that they had loans until department staff told them, according to a letter sent to the college. McDougle contested the decision and appears to continue to operate.
The data dump belatedly fulfills a March 2021 request from a coalition of consumer protection advocates and organizations focused on higher ed accountability. Some of those advocates said this month’s release of information was helpful—but that they’re generally disappointed in the office’s actions, now that there’s a fuller accounting of them.
The enforcement actions have been fairly standard; nearly half related to failures to comply with federal campus safety laws or federal reporting requirements. Of the colleges that lost aid eligibility, 13 lost it because they were no longer recognized by an accreditor—a baseline requirement for accessing federal financial aid.
Advocates had hoped that the Biden administration’s Education Department would move more aggressively to go after universities that have misled or defrauded students, either with larger fines or revoked eligibility for federal financial aid.
“The enforcement effort is more serious, but has moved more slowly than the urgency of the problem requires,” said David Halperin, an attorney critical of for-profits. “I am impressed, but they do need to go faster.”
Halperin did appreciate this month’s disclosures. He said he raised concerns about Prospect College with the Education Department after Biden took office, but he didn’t receive any word about the institution losing access to the financial aid until the enforcement office posted its documents online this month.
Donoghue, chief enforcement officer at Federal Student Aid, said in an interview with Inside Higher Ed that her team will “always go where the facts take us and take action where we think it’s appropriate.”
“We have been very focused on building an investigation team that has skills in the background needed to do these investigations, and we have brought some actions that we think are very significant and warranted,” she said. “And we will continue to do that.”
Donoghue has worked to rebuild the office’s investigations team and put in place other tools that she relied on at the CFPB to “make sure oversight work is robust and complete.” That includes using undercover agents commonly known as secret shoppers to identify potentially deceptive practices and launching a tip line for “knowledgeable insiders” to share information about potential misconduct. So far, secret shopping has been used “at a number of schools,” Donoghue said, informing decisions about whether to proceed with an investigation.
“It’s a very valuable tool in our toolbox,” she said.
Will the office’s work over the last three years make it more resilient with a coming a change in administration, particularly if former president Trump returns to the White House? Donoghue said that while she didn’t have a crystal ball, “student and taxpayer protection is a nonpartisan issue.”
Halperin and other advocates who’ve followed the department’s enforcement work for years have noticed changes. He sees a new emphasis on enforcement “as opposed to a culture of labeling the school partners and bending over backwards to sweep violations under the rug.” That matters, he said, because “it tells schools that it’s time to behave and that having federal aid is a privilege.”
“At the very end of Obama, they started to wake up to all this stuff,” Halperin continued. “But there was still a lot of work to be done to overcome the history of institutional reluctance and avoidance of controversy or confrontation with institutions.”
But Thomas Jones, who leads the American Accountability Foundation, a conservative nonprofit, said that the Office of Enforcement “has been prosecuting a years-long vendetta against career colleges.” Others who represent for-profit colleges have also accused the Education Department of unfairly targeting career colleges via regulations and other actions.
“The office’s myopic focus on a sliver of the higher education landscape has come at the expense of ignoring abuses at traditional universities that often saddle students with over $100,000 in student loan debt with little prospect of gainful employment,” Jones said. “The only explanation for the Office of Enforcement ignoring traditional four-year universities is that liberals in the administration want to protect their traditional allies in academia."
Barmak Nassirian, vice president for higher education policy at Veterans Education Success, an advocacy group, said enforcement is one area where the Biden administration hasn’t “managed to soar as high.” He did give the Education Department “superlatively high grades” for their efforts to provide debt relief to students who need it, including those misled by their institutions about the value of their college educations.
“I wish they had more bandwidth to fix everything,” he said. “In some ways, I can’t blame them.” But “when abusive practices are normalized, it becomes a real challenge to change the culture of the regulated community. It’s not a couple of bad spots. This is a royal mess clear across the board.”
Nassirian noted that the department has limited tools to address noncompliance with federal rules—something he partly blames on congressional inaction. He acknowledged that the department has tried and put measures in place such as secret shopping to “improve the regulatory framework so that enforcement could be more meaningfully applied.”
“But have they cleaned it up?” he asked. “The answer is no.”
Student protesters at three universities, suspended for violating campus codes of conduct, are suing their institutio
More from student aid policy.
The order blocked the Biden administration’s SAVE plan and raised questions about the Education Department’s authorit
A new survey from New Mexico shows that nearly 60 percent of students are food insecure.
Community colleges spent much of their federal COVID-19 relief funds on student supports, technology and infrastructu
4 /5 Articles remaining this month.
An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
August 13, 2024
Dear Colleagues:
The U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) Directorate for STEM Education (EDU), Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) invites two-year colleges to submit a request for support to enable full participation in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (HHMI SEA-PHAGES) program 1 . As part of this effort, this Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) announces a cooperative initiative between NSF EDU and the Center for the Advancement of Science Leadership and Culture (CASLC) at HHMI 2 . By joining forces, HHMI and NSF aim to leverage their respective expertise, resources, and networks to catalyze and expand support of the next generation of scientists. This initiative aligns with the National Science Foundation's 2022-2026 Strategic plan 3 by accelerating relevant STEM education enhancement efforts, cultivating a more inclusive and dynamic research ecosystem, and broadening participation in STEM.
The HHMI SEA-PHAGES initiative offers an authentic, yet accessible, course-based research experience (CRE) designed for students entering college-level science with limited or no prior research exposure. At the center of the SEA-PHAGES program is a community of STEM faculty who are supported to implement CREs collaboratively. Through this approach, the growing community of faculty members from over 150 institutions collectively engage over 6,000 undergraduate students in course-based research, support one another in the development of instructional practices to advance their pedagogy, and contribute to research projects aimed at enhancing undergraduate science education more broadly. The HHMI Science Education Alliance 4 , in partnership with NSF's IUSE: Innovation in Two-Year Colleges STEM Education (ITYC) program 5 , seeks to scale this transformative initiative to two-year colleges nationwide.
The ITYC program is a component of the NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education effort that is committed to supporting potentially transformative projects that seek to advance innovative evidence-based practices in undergraduate STEM education. Recognizing the importance of two-year colleges in the undergraduate education landscape 6 , the goals of the ITYC program are to: (1) center students in the effort to advance innovation, promote equitable outcomes and broaden participation for all students, and (2) enhance the capacity of two-year colleges to harness the talent and potential of their diverse student and faculty populations through innovative disciplinary, multi-department, and college-wide projects.
This Dear Colleague Letter encourages two-year colleges to submit planning proposals to the ITYC program , that focus on the activities associated with adapting and implementing the discovery-based HHMI SEA-PHAGES curriculum in laboratory courses within a two-year college biosciences program. Planning proposals responding to this DCL should align with ITYC goals and request resources required to participate in the SEA-PHAGES program and effectively adapt and optimize a CRE approach in a new environment. Proposals may include, but are not limited to, faculty and laboratory technician supports, equipment needs, and additional supplies necessary for implementation of the SEA-PHAGES curriculum. Resources can also be requested for efforts that aim to implement the SEA-PHAGES approach in unique contexts with diverse student populations, expand CREs across additional biosciences courses, and development of mentorship models that support student success in a CRE learning environment. Projects that connect SEA-PHAGES courses to the local community, embrace students' lived experiences, and/or generate knowledge about factors associated with the impact of this approach in the context of two-year colleges are particularly encouraged.
Before submitting a planning proposal, a one-page concept outline and a consultation with an NSF ITYC Program Director is required. Guidance on Concept Outlines can be found in Chapter I.D.1 of the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide ( PAPPG ). If approved, the NSF Program Director will invite submission of the planning proposal by email. The email confirming approval must be uploaded as a document in the Program Officer Concurrence Email(s) section of the planning proposal.
SEA-PHAGES-TYC proposals must be prepared in accordance with the instructions for the planning type of proposal contained in Chapter II.F of the PAPPG and must be submitted through Research.gov. Proposers should select the current PAPPG as the funding opportunity in Research.gov and direct the proposal to the ITYC program in the Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) in the Directorate for STEM Education (EDU). The "Planning" type of proposal should be selected, and the proposal title should include "SEA-PHAGES-TYCs DCL:" after the prepended title "Planning:". Proposals should be submitted at the level of an ITYC planning proposal which has a funding limit of up to $100,000 per year for a maximum duration of two years. Proposals may be submitted by two-year colleges of higher education (either Associates College or Baccalaureate / Associates Colleges) that are accredited and offer undergraduate educational degree programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
Before submission, proposers must submit a separate application to the HHMI SEA-PHAGES program, available on the HHMI site . Proposals to this DCL are accepted at any time but must align with the HHMI application process. Proposals responding to this DCL should be submitted concurrently with an application to HHMI SEA-PHAGES or shortly thereafter. Two-year colleges that are currently members of the HHMI SEA-PHAGES community are encouraged to submit proposals to the regular ITYC program. Only institutions new to SEA-PHAGES are eligible for this funding opportunity.
NSF encourages proposals that include the participation of the full spectrum of diverse talent in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) that attend two-year institutions.
Proposals submitted in response to this DCL will be shared with The HHMI SEA-PHAGES program team.
Principal investigators with questions pertaining to this DCL may contact:
James L. Moore, III Assistant Director Directorate for STEM Education (EDU)
1 Leading the World in Discovery and Innovation, STEM Talent Development and the Delivery of Benefits from Research: NSF Strategic Plan 2022-2026 .
2 Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) Program: https://seaphages.org/ .
3 Center for the Advancement of Science Leadership and Culture (CASLC) at HHMI: https://www.hhmi.org/equitable-science .
4 HHMI Science Education Alliance: https://hhmi.org/programs/science-education-alliance .
5 Innovation in Two-Year College STEM Education Program site: https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/iuse-innovation-two-year-college-stem-education .
6 Foley D. Milan L., Hamrick, K: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics 2020. The Increasing Role of Community Colleges among Bachelor's Degree Recipients: Findings from the 2019 National Survey of College Graduates.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The New Education Policy 2023 thus aims to reduce the curriculum burden on students and will be more 'inter-disciplinary and multi-lingual'. The reforms begin with the model of examinations. Mother tongue promotion. The cornerstone of the New Education Policy 2023 is the importance accorded to education in one's mother tongue.
Innovative Shift in National Education Policy 2023 (NEP-2023) Under the Visionary Leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji and the Ministry of Human Resource Development, the New Education Policy of 2023 marks a pivotal milestone in the nation's educational journey. The policy was released on 29 July 2020 after approval by the Union ...
NEP-2020 approved by Indian Union Cabinet on July 29, 2020 which is set out the vision for new education system of each Indian. This policy is related to increasing access, improving quality and promoting the different area of research and innovation factor. The aim of policy is to function able or applicable by 2021.
RATIONALE FOR NEW EDUCATION POLICY 2023: The NEP 2023 aims to transform India's education system by addressing long-standing challenges of access, equity, and quality. It is driven by the desire to provide high-quality education to all, close gaps, and prepare students for a globalized economy.
Brown Center on Education Policy. From the continued response to pandemic disruptions to culture war issues that have surfaced in schools, 2022 was an eventful year for U.S. schools and education ...
The New Educational Policy (NEP) has directed states to implement FLN in primary school curriculums by 2025. The policy focuses on experiential learning, equipping students with 21st-century skills and reducing course content. Vocational education will be available in 6th-8th grade, along with internship opportunities.
Conclusion. In conclusion, the New Education Policy 2023-24 holds the promise of ushering in a new era of education in India. By addressing key areas such as holistic development, flexibility, skill development, and cultural inclusivity, the policy aims to create a robust educational ecosystem. Encouraging active participation and feedback from ...
Continuous Assessments: Include quizzes, projects, presentations, class participation, and other methods that gauge students' understanding rather than relying solely on high-stakes examinations. Competency-based Assessments: ... New education policy 2023 strongly emphasizes developing oral, written, and digital communication skills, ...
Urgent call for appropriate use of technology in learning and global guidance on generative AI in education. UNESCO's 2023 Global Education Monitoring Report on technology in education highlights the lack of appropriate governance and regulation. It urges countries to set their own terms for the way technology is designed and used in ...
The new education policy must provide to all students, irrespective of their place of residence, a quality education system, with particular focus on historically marginalized, disadvantaged, and underrepresented groups. Education is a great leveler and is the best tool for achieving economic and social mobility, inclusion, and equality. ...
In 2024, education and training systems have a 'unique potential' to build the foundations of equitable, sustainable societies. In the OECD National Survey for Comparative Policy Analysis 2023: Empowering Learners to go Green, 90% of participating systems identified environmental sustainability as a key priority for 2024.
The National Education Policy of India 2020 (NEP 2020), which was started by the Union Cabinet of India on 29 July 2020, outlines the vision of new education system of India. [1] The new policy replaces the previous National Policy on Education, 1986. [a] The policy is a comprehensive framework for elementary education to higher as well as vocational training in both rural and urban India.
Conclusion. Parliament panel's findings on the New Education Policy 2023 highlight both progress and challenges. While there's commendable progress in implementing the policy with initiatives like PM Schools and internationalization. However the issues such as limited accessibility, linguistic barriers, and funding gaps need urgent attention.
New Education Policy 2023-2024 India - Understand the key changes, reforms, and implications for the education system in this informative guide. ... One of the critical highlights of the new instruction strategy is the presentation of another 5+3+3+4 design for school training. This structure, which takes the place of the 10+2 structure that is ...
The annual comparative reports of the Education Policy Outlook monitor the evolution of policy landscapes mainly among the education systems of OECD Countries. The Education Policy Outlook follows the premise that knowledge of education policy is as valuable as the capacity to use it. Covering selected topics from early childhood education to adult education, the reports aim to provide a ...
The fundamental principles of the National Curriculum Framework are: Holistic Development: The NCF 2023 emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to education that promotes the overall development of students. It could include developing students' physical, emotional, social, and cognitive skills. Inclusivity: The NCF 2023 is likely to ...
NCF 2023: Get here Overview, Key Changes and Highlights of the National Curriculum Framework, in line with New Education Policy (NEP) 2020, for New Education System in the Schools.
In pursuance of this mission, the Ministry of Education (MoE) was created on September 26, 1985, through the 174th amendment to the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961. Currently, the MoE works through two departments: 1)Department of School Education & Literacy 2) Department of Higher Education.
Through the Culminating Project and Presentation, students must demonstrate the required level of proficiency based on the language of the project. For English and category 1-2 modern languages (those that use a Roman-based alphabet such as Spanish, French, Italian, German), the required proficiency level is Intermediate High.
The Education Department has issued $61.7 million in fines and cut off aid to 35 colleges for violations since 2021. Some critics say it hasn't gone far enough in holding rule breakers accountable; others say the feds have a "vendetta" against career colleges. A for-profit college based in Washington, D.C., that offered IT and health-care programs shut down in May 2023 after the ...
Rep. Carter Nordman, R-Panora (2023) Rep. Carter Nordman, R-Panora, chairman of the Iowa House education budget committee, through which Senate File 2435 advanced, said lawmakers wanted to help ...
August 13, 2024. Dear Colleagues: The U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) Directorate for STEM Education (EDU), Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) invites two-year colleges to submit a request for support to enable full participation in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (HHMI SEA-PHAGES) program 1.