write an essay on problems of periodization in history

Problems of Periodization in World History

The task of breaking the past into manageable, labeled, chunks of time raises several sorts of problems. We can classify them as theoretical, organizational, and ethical.

Theoretical Problems

Periodization poses theoretical problems because any chronological scheme highlights some aspects of the past and obscures others. While a historian of gender might look for eras in which the relative status and power of women and men changed (the granting of suffrage to women, perhaps, or the emergence of patriarchal social relations in early agrarian societies), a historian of war might be more interested in technological changes that transformed military conflict (such as the use of gunpowder or the appearance of the first organized armies), while a historian of religion might look to the appearance of the so-called universal religions in the first millennium BCE. Different questions highlight different aspects of the past and generate different periodizations. To choose a periodization is to make some critical judgments about what is and what is not most important in human history. By focusing on a particular region, era, or topic, historians can avoid some of these challenges, but in world history, periodization requires judgments as to the most important changes across all societies on earth. Is there sufficient consensus among historians as to what those changes are? At present, the answer is probably no.

Organizational Problems

Periodization also poses severe organizational challenges. How can we find labels that can do justice to many different regions and societies, each with its own distinctive historical trajectory? The problem is peculiarly acute in world history because while neighboring regions or states may evolve in closely related ways, societies separated by large distances may often seem to have little in common. The modern history profession emerged in Europe, and many well-established schemes of periodization were designed to make sense of European history. This is true, for example, of the traditional division into ancient, medieval, and modern periods. Such labels make little sense outside of Europe, but they are so well established that they sometimes get used nevertheless. Similarly, Chinese historians have long used dynastic labels to provide a framework for historical writing, but these, too, are labels that mean little elsewhere. Is it possible to find labels that make sense for Africa as well as for the whole of Eurasia, the Americas, and the Pacific? On this question, too, there is currently no consensus among historians.

Ethical Problems

Periodization also poses ethical problems because it can so easily imply value judgments. School texts on European history have commonly used such labels as “ Dark Ages,” “Middle Ages,” “Renaissance,” “Scientific Revolution,” and “Age of the Democratic Revolution.” When used of entire historical periods, such labels were by no means neutral. They were generally used with the clear understanding that the Dark Ages were backward, that the Middle Ages were transitional, and that real progress towards modernity began with the Renaissance. Such schemes carry value judgments about different regions as well as different eras, because they implicitly compare the differing levels of “progress” of different regions. Until recently, it was commonly argued that, while Western societies had modernized, many other societies were stuck in earlier historical eras or stages and needed to catch up. Is it possible to construct a system of periodization that avoids imposing the values of one period or region on another?

No system of periodization can satisfy all these different demands. Like historical writing in general, schemes of periodization reflect the biases and judgments of the era that produced them. They also reflect the questions being asked and the scale on which those questions are posed. This means that no single scheme will be appropriate for the many different scales on which historians can and do write about the past.

• WorldHistory -> Sundries

Essay Curve

Essay on Problems of Periodization In History

Essay on Problems of Periodization In History: Periodization in history is a crucial tool for organizing and understanding the past, but it is not without its problems. In this essay, we will explore the challenges and limitations of periodization in historical study. From the arbitrary nature of dividing history into discrete periods to the Eurocentric biases that often shape our understanding of the past, we will delve into the complexities of periodization and its impact on our interpretation of history.

Table of Contents

Problems of Periodization In History Essay Writing Tips

1. Start by defining periodization in history: Explain that periodization is the process of dividing history into distinct periods based on certain criteria such as political events, social changes, or cultural shifts.

2. Discuss the challenges of periodization: Point out that periodization can be problematic because history is not always neatly divided into distinct periods. Events and developments often overlap and influence each other in complex ways.

3. Address the issue of Eurocentrism: Note that traditional periodization in history has often been Eurocentric, focusing primarily on Western civilizations and neglecting the contributions and experiences of other cultures and regions.

4. Consider the impact of globalization: Explain that globalization has made it increasingly difficult to define periods in history as events and ideas now spread rapidly across the globe, blurring traditional boundaries between periods.

5. Explore the role of technology: Discuss how advancements in technology have accelerated the pace of change in society, making it challenging to determine when one period ends and another begins.

6. Reflect on the limitations of periodization: Acknowledge that periodization is a useful tool for organizing historical events, but it can also oversimplify complex historical processes and overlook important nuances and connections.

7. Offer potential solutions: Suggest that historians should approach periodization with caution, considering multiple perspectives and taking into account the interconnectedness of historical events. They should also be open to revising traditional periodization schemes to better reflect the complexities of history.

8. Provide examples: Use specific historical examples to illustrate the challenges of periodization and how they have been addressed by historians in the past.

9. Conclude by emphasizing the importance of critically examining periodization in history: Stress that understanding the problems of periodization can lead to a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of historical events and processes. By acknowledging the limitations of periodization, historians can develop more inclusive and accurate narratives of the past.

Essay on Problems of Periodization In History in 10 Lines – Examples

1. The concept of periodization in history is the division of time into distinct periods based on significant events or changes. 2. One problem with periodization is that it can be subjective, with different historians dividing history into periods in different ways. 3. Another issue is that periods can overlap or be interconnected, making it difficult to clearly define boundaries between them. 4. Periodization can also be Eurocentric, focusing on Western history and neglecting the histories of other regions and cultures. 5. It can also oversimplify complex historical processes, leading to a distorted understanding of the past. 6. Periodization can create a linear view of history, ignoring the cyclical nature of historical events and developments. 7. It can also perpetuate stereotypes and biases, reinforcing certain narratives while marginalizing others. 8. Periodization may not accurately reflect the experiences of people living during those periods, as their lives were often more complex and multifaceted. 9. Additionally, periodization can limit our understanding of historical continuity and change, as it breaks up history into discrete segments. 10. Despite these challenges, periodization remains a useful tool for organizing and studying history, as long as we are aware of its limitations and complexities.

Sample Essay on Problems of Periodization In History in 100-180 Words

Periodization in history is the process of dividing time into distinct periods for the purpose of analysis and study. However, there are several problems associated with this practice. One major issue is the arbitrary nature of dividing history into neat, discrete periods when in reality, historical events and developments do not neatly fit into these categories. This can lead to oversimplification and distortion of historical narratives.

Another problem is the Eurocentric bias in periodization, where the history of non-Western civilizations is often marginalized or ignored. This can result in a distorted view of global history and perpetuate a Eurocentric perspective.

Furthermore, the boundaries between periods are often blurred and overlapping, making it difficult to accurately define when one period ends and another begins. This can lead to confusion and inconsistencies in historical analysis.

In conclusion, while periodization is a useful tool for organizing and studying history, it is important to be aware of its limitations and challenges in order to avoid oversimplification and distortion of historical narratives.

Short Essay on Problems of Periodization In History in 200-500 Words

Periodization in history refers to the division of time into distinct periods based on certain criteria such as political, social, cultural, or economic changes. While periodization is a useful tool for historians to organize and analyze historical events, it is not without its problems and limitations.

One of the main problems of periodization in history is the arbitrary nature of dividing time into discrete periods. Historians often disagree on the boundaries of periods and the criteria used to define them. For example, the Renaissance is often considered a distinct period in European history, but there is no consensus on when it began or ended. This can lead to confusion and inconsistencies in historical narratives.

Another problem with periodization is the tendency to oversimplify complex historical processes. By dividing history into neat periods, historians risk overlooking the interconnectedness of events and the continuity of certain trends over time. For example, the transition from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance was not a sudden break, but a gradual process that unfolded over centuries.

Furthermore, periodization can be Eurocentric and neglect the histories of non-Western societies. The traditional periodization of world history often focuses on the development of Western civilization, while ignoring the contributions and experiences of other cultures. This can lead to a distorted and incomplete understanding of global history.

Additionally, periodization can be teleological, meaning that it imposes a sense of inevitability or progress onto historical events. This can lead to a biased interpretation of history that emphasizes certain developments while downplaying others. For example, the periodization of the Enlightenment as a time of progress and reason can overlook the darker aspects of colonialism and slavery that also characterized this era.

Finally, periodization can be limiting in its scope and perspective. By dividing history into discrete periods, historians risk overlooking the complexity and diversity of human experiences. History is not a series of neatly defined periods, but a continuous and multifaceted tapestry of events and interactions.

In conclusion, while periodization is a useful tool for organizing and analyzing historical events, it is not without its problems and limitations. Historians must be aware of the arbitrary nature of periodization, the tendency to oversimplify complex processes, the Eurocentric and teleological biases, and the limitations of dividing history into discrete periods. By critically examining these issues, historians can develop a more nuanced and inclusive understanding of the past.

Essay on Problems of Periodization In History in 1000-1500 Words

Periodization in history is the process of dividing history into distinct periods or eras based on significant events, developments, or changes. While periodization can be a useful tool for organizing and understanding historical events, it also presents several problems and challenges. In this essay, I will discuss some of the problems of periodization in history, focusing on the period between 1000 and 1500.

One of the main problems of periodization in history is the arbitrary nature of dividing history into distinct periods. Historians often disagree on when one period ends and another begins, leading to inconsistencies and confusion in historical narratives. For example, the period between 1000 and 1500 is often divided into the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, but the exact dates and characteristics of these periods are debated among historians. This can make it difficult for students and scholars to understand and interpret historical events within a specific period.

Another problem of periodization in history is the tendency to oversimplify complex historical processes. By dividing history into neat and tidy periods, historians risk overlooking the interconnectedness and continuity of historical events. For example, the transition from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance was not a sudden or linear process, but rather a complex and multifaceted transformation that unfolded over centuries. By dividing this period into two distinct eras, historians may oversimplify the historical narrative and miss important nuances and complexities.

Furthermore, periodization in history can be Eurocentric and neglectful of non-Western perspectives and experiences. The period between 1000 and 1500 is often characterized by the rise of European powers and the spread of Western culture and ideas, but this overlooks the rich and diverse histories of other regions and civilizations during this time. For example, the Islamic Golden Age, the Mongol Empire, and the Ming Dynasty in China were all significant developments that occurred during this period, but they are often marginalized or ignored in Eurocentric historical narratives.

Additionally, periodization in history can be influenced by political and ideological biases, leading to a distorted or selective interpretation of historical events. For example, the period between 1000 and 1500 is often divided into the Middle Ages and the Renaissance based on cultural and intellectual developments in Europe, but this overlooks the social, economic, and political changes that were occurring in other parts of the world during this time. By focusing solely on European history, historians risk perpetuating a Eurocentric and ethnocentric view of the past.

In conclusion, periodization in history presents several problems and challenges, particularly when examining the period between 1000 and 1500. The arbitrary nature of dividing history into distinct periods, the tendency to oversimplify complex historical processes, the Eurocentric bias, and the influence of political and ideological biases all contribute to the limitations of periodization in history. To overcome these problems, historians must strive to adopt a more nuanced and inclusive approach to periodization, one that recognizes the interconnectedness and diversity of historical events and perspectives. By doing so, historians can provide a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the past.

Related Essays

Essay on A Visit To A Fair – 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Value of Games And Sports – Essay in 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Essay on Importance of Teacher – 100, 200, 500, 1000 Words

Essay on A Visit To A Museum – 100, 200, 500, 1000 Words

Essay on Effect of Social Media On Youth

Essay on Shri Guru Nanak Dev Ji – Short & Long Essay Examples

Essay on Nuclear Family – Short Essay & Long Essay upto 1500 Words

Essay on Anudeep Durishetty – 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Essay on Non Violence – Samples, 10 Lines to 1500 Words

Covid 19 Responsive School – Essay in 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Civilsdaily

No. 1 UPSC IAS Platform for preparation

Historical and Archaeological Findings in News

Problematising periodisation in history.

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level: na

Mains level: history to be a continual process rather than an aggregate of disparate tranches

Central idea 

The article talks about how historians divided history into ancient, medieval, and modern times, mostly influenced by European ideas. It questions these divisions and suggests we rethink history as a continuous story. The key point is that there isn’t just one way to be “modern,” and we should consider different perspectives in understanding history.

Key Highlights:

• The article critiques the conventional historical periodization of ancient, medieval, and modern eras, tracing its origins to European concepts.
• It explores the imposition of this triad on global history through colonialism and challenges the Eurocentric narrative.
• The author questions the dichotomies inherent in periodization, such as change versus continuity and stages of development.
• The notion of modernity is central to periodization, with the article highlighting the evolving understanding of “modernities” in contemporary discourse.
• The transformation from viewing modernity as an objective reality to a subjective, context-specific concept is emphasized.

Key Challenges:

• The article confronts the challenge of reevaluating historical narratives deeply entrenched in Eurocentrism.
• It challenges the dichotomous framework of periodization, urging historians to consider continuity within apparent changes.
• The author grapples with the resistance to viewing history as a universal entity, urging a shift from fragmented tranches to a continual process.
• Periodization: Dividing history into distinct periods for analysis and understanding.
• Modernity: The quality or condition of being modern; contemporary social and cultural features.
• Eurocentrism : The dominance or undue focus on European culture, history, and values.

Key Phrases:

• “Theft of History” : Refers to the imposition of European historical concepts on non-European societies through colonial power dynamics.
• “Dark Age”: The Eurocentric portrayal of the medieval period as a time of irrationality, regression, and superstition.
• “Modernities”: Acknowledges the diverse and context-specific manifestations of modernity in different regions.

Key Quotes:

• “The modern world that we inhabit was thus essentially the West’s creation.”
• “Modernity that had for long been accepted as an objective reality ‘out there’… has become subjective in each variant context.”
• “This calls for the treatment of history as a universal entity of which regions form constituents.”

Key Statements:

• The triad of ancient, medieval, and modern periods originated in Europe and was imposed globally through colonialism.
• The article challenges the dichotomies of periodization and urges a reconsideration of history as a continual process.
• The evolving understanding of modernity reflects a shift from a singular, Eurocentric perspective to recognizing diverse “modernities.”

Key Examples and References:

• Reference to James Mill introducing the triad in Indian history to legitimize British rule.
• Mention of Jack Goody’s concept of “The Theft of History” in the unequal power relationship between Europe and its colonies.

Key Facts and Data:

• The triad of ancient, medieval, and modern periodization originated in Europe in the 16th-17th centuries.
• The article emphasizes the need to reconsider history as a universal entity, acknowledging contributions from all civilizations.

Critical Analysis:

• The article critically examines the Eurocentric biases embedded in historical periodization.
• It challenges the binary thinking of periodization and encourages a nuanced understanding of historical processes.
• The evolving nature of the concept of modernity is analyzed, highlighting its subjectivity in diverse contexts.

Way Forward:

• The article suggests a shift from fragmented tranches to a more holistic and continual approach to history.
• Encourages historians to explore emerging areas of research such as climate, planetary history, and reevaluation of pre-history and archaeology.
• Calls for a more inclusive and diverse narrative that recognizes the contributions of all societies to the world’s historical development.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across social media platforms., your better version awaits you.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Temporal Divides: A Critical Review of the Major Schemes of Periodization in Indian History (Journal of Social Sciences, GC University, Faisalabad, Vol. 1, No. 1, July 2004, pp. 32-50)

Related Papers

Labelling Times The ›Early Modern‹ – European Past and Global Now

Daniel Woolf

This essay argues that recent attacks on the notion of periodization in history, while correct in pointing to the traps and limitations of periods, are at risk of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. In particular, it argues for a distinction between periodizing as a cognitive process, necessary in order to order material and make different causal and other connections, on the one hand, and periodization as a rigid set of structures that distort and constrain our sense of the past. We can and must periodize, but this needs to be a continuous, not occasional, process.

aparna joshi

TANMAY KULSHRESTHA

Periodisation may seem a bit obscure topic but it is the very base on which historians define and give shape to their theories. Without a well-built chronology, understanding of the past would not be possible. It is here that periodisation or classifying history comes in handy. It becomes a reference point for every scholar with which he/she tries to connect the present. It becomes an essential tool for mapping change and growth, whether positive or negative, throughout the history.

Research Discourse

Dr. Mamata Nanda

Time is the most important factor of history because it gives identity to it by differentiating it from present and future. So far nobody could have defined 'time' but each one from living to non-living has felt it directly from their beginning to end. It is surprising to note that, time which is the core of any historical work, historians have shown very little attention towards it. It is the literary scholars who have seized upon the subject of time before the historians. One reason for this may be because both modernism and postmodernism had more impact on literature than on history. But historians tend to assume the existence of "modernity", indeed posit it as a fundamental dividing line in historical studies and in most occasions, they describe it in their work rather than investigating it as a temporal category. What historians failed to attest is that, it is the western notion of the time imposed on the non-western world with an idea of the dichotomy of the backward and progressive world. Every culture was having (perhaps still having) a notion of time which can be evidenced by their historical accounts. So it is necessary to reinvestigate into the notion of time to understand 'the history' in its temporality rather than comparing it with the western time frame.

Michelguglielmo Torri

Randolph Starn

David Manning

Dialogue Quarterly

Ramakrishnan Sitaraman

Link: http://www.asthabharati.org/Dia_Jan%20020.pdf

Chris F G Lorenz

In this chapter, I will first analyze some of the recent evolutions in the study of historical time and focus on the much discussed relationship between history and modernity. In the first part, I will zoom in on Reinhart Koselleck’s influential idea that ‘exponential acceleration’ is the core of modernity and how this idea also informs the new varieties of ‘presentism’ as formulated by Francois Hartog and Hans-Ulrich Gumbrecht. In the second part, I will highlight the connection between the rise of modernity and the rise of history as a discipline in general and how ‘modern history’ as a period has created all other periods in particular. In the third part, the origins of the modern conception of linear time will be traced, including its ‘relativization’ in physics since Einstein and the connection of time and space. Next, the question how the rise of postmodern and postcolonial ideas have influenced historical thinking concerning time will be addressed. In the fourth and last part, I will return to the issue of periodization in history, including the interconnections between periodizing time and the construction of space and identity.

Contents and reviews of PDNRL no. 37

The De Nobili Research Library – Association for Indology and the Study of Religion

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Der Islam 2014; 91(1): 6–19

Konrad Hirschler

“Periodization and ‘The Medieval Globe’: A Conversation.” Kathleen Davis and Michael Puett.

Michael Puett

Sarah Savant

Stephen H Rigby

Jerald Hage

Eva von Dassow

J. Moreland, J. Mitchell, B. Leal (eds.), Encounters, Excavations and Argosies. Essays for Richard Hodges, Oxford

Andrea Augenti

Cambridge University Press

Oded Y Steinberg

Tim Rudd , IVOR GOODSON

Pavan Tiwari

Maria Mudrovcic

Cliodynamics: The Journal of Quantitative History and Cultural Evolution

David Christian

Zoltán Boldizsár Simon , Marek Tamm

Indian Economic and Social History Review

Neo-Orientalism and Chronology - Part 1

Manogna Sastry

The Exemplifying Past. A Philosophy of History

Chiel van den Akker

Penelope J Corfield

Jakub Mlynář

Alexandra Lianeri

Social HIstory 39, 3

Tanvir Anjum

Byron Hamann

Chronologics: Periodisation in a Global Context

Sanjay Subrahmanyam

Geschichtstheorie am Werk

Augusto de Carvalho

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Periodization

• Living reference work entry
• Later version available View entry history
• First Online: 01 December 2022
• Cite this living reference work entry

• Michelle M. Dowd 3  

18 Accesses

Periodization–the process of dividing and categorizing the past into distinct blocks of time–can be an extremely useful, even necessary, analytical rubric, as it provides a way of distinguishing a period of time and the literature produced during that period from those both before and after. However, periodization is never a neutral process, something that is especially true when considering how (and if) women’s writing fits into traditional period divides (such as “Renaissance” or “Restoration”). Putting critical pressure on the connections and disconnections between women’s writing and the traditional frameworks of historical temporality that tend to govern much literary scholarship and the institutional structures within which it is studied and taught can open up new understandings about the place of women’s textual production within literary history writ large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Achinstein, Sharon. 1994. “Introduction: Gender, Literature, and the English Revolution.” Women’s Studies 24 (1–2): 2–3.

Google Scholar  

Akhimie, Patricia, and Bernadette Andrea, eds. 2019. Travel and Travail: Early Modern Women, English Drama, and the Wider World . Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Andrea, Bernadette. 2008. Women and Islam in Early Modern English Literature . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Coletti, Theresa. 2013. ‘“Did Women Have a Renaissance?” A Medievalist Reads Joan Kelly and Aemilia Lanyer.” Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal 8: 249–59.

Article   Google Scholar  

Davis, Kathleen. 2010. “Periodization and the Matter of Precedent.” postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies 1 (3). https://doi.org/10.1057/pmed.2010.32

Dowd, Michelle M. 2022. “Untimely Developments: Periodization, Early Modern Women’s Writing, and Literary History.” In The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Women’s Writing in English, 1540–1700 , edited by Danielle Clarke, Sarah C.E. Ross, and Elizabeth Scott-Baumann, 735–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ferguson, Margaret. 1994. “Moderation and Its Discontents: Recent Work on Renaissance Women.” Feminist Studies, 20 (2): 349–66.

Greenblatt, Stephen, ed. 2018. The Norton Anthology of English Literature . 10th ed. New York: Norton.

Hayot, Eric. 2011. “Against Periodization; or, On Institutional Time.” New Literary History 42 (4): 739–56.

Kelly, Joan. 1984. “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” In Women, History, and Theory: The Essays of Joan Kelly . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Knoppers, Laura Lunger. 2009. “Introduction: Critical Framework and Issues.” In The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing , edited by Laura Lunger Knoppers, 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Matthews, David. 2008. The Medieval Invasion of Early Modern England. New Medieval Literatures 10: 223–44.

Ross, Sarah C. E. 2015. Women, Poetry, and Politics in Seventeenth-Century Britain . Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Ross, Sarah C. E., and Elizabeth Scott-Baumann, eds. 2018. Women Poets of the English Civil War . Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Salzman, Paul. 2006. Reading Early Modern Women’s Writing . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scott, Jonathan. 2000. England's Troubles: Seventeenth-Century English Political Instability in European Context . Cambridge: Cambridge.

Shepard, Alexandra, and Garthine Walker. 2008. “Gender, Change and Periodisation.” Gender and History 20 (3): 453–62.

Suzuki, Mihoko. 2003. Subordinate Subjects: Gender, the Political Nation, and Literary Form in England, 1588–1688 . Aldershot: Ashgate.

Warren, Nancy Bradley. 2010. The Embodied Word: Female Spiritualities, Contested Orthodoxies, and English Religious Cultures, 1350–1700 . Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E. 2008. “Do Women Need the Renaissance?” Gender and History 20 (3): 539–57.

Wright, Gillian. 2013. Producing Women’s Poetry, 1600–1730: Text and Paratext, Manuscript and Print . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wrightson, Keith. 1993. “The Enclosure of English Social History.” In, Rethinking Social History: English Society 1520–1970 and its Interpretation , edited by Adrian Wilson, 59–77. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

Michelle M. Dowd

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle M. Dowd .

Section Editor information

University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Danielle Clarke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Dowd, M.M. (2022). Periodization. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Early Modern Women's Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_438-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_438-1

Received : 22 February 2022

Accepted : 01 August 2022

Published : 01 December 2022

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-01537-4

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-01537-4

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media Studies Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Humanities

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_438-2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_438-1

• Find a journal
• Track your research