shoulder presentation complications of fetus

• Vishal's account
• Prenatal Care

Shoulder Presentation – All You Should Be Aware Of

When Does the Fetus Move in Birthing Position?

What is shoulder presentation, what is transverse lie, what is the frequency of shoulder presentation, what causes shoulder presentation, how is shoulder presentation diagnosed, complications of shoulder presentation, how is shoulder presentation managed.

Most doctors and midwives will recommend that you have a natural vaginal birth if you have a choice. However, there are certain complications that can sometimes present themselves and stop this from happening. Shoulder presentation is one such complication.

A baby will most likely begin to move into the birthing position latest by week 30 . She will have her head down and facing your spine, her body and face more inclined to one side and arms will be folded across the chest. Any other position is not normal.

This is an abnormal fetus position where the baby is in a transverse lie , causing the baby’s shoulder to be positioned to come out first if vaginal delivery is attempted. However, since this is very easy to diagnose, doctors will always recommend a C-Section and never even suggest attempting to deliver the child through normal vaginal delivery.

A transverse lie is a position where your baby is lying sideways with her head to one of your sides and her bottom at your other side. This position is considered normal before 26 gestational weeks.

Shoulder presentation takes place in 1 out of every 300 births and is commonly seen in premature and macerated babies. It is five times more likely to happen in a woman who has had children before than it is to occur in a first-time mother. Mothers carrying twins are also 40% more likely to have at least one baby in shoulder position.

Here are some reasons why a shoulder presentation can take place:

1. Contracted Pelvis

A very narrow pelvis in the mother can cause a shoulder presentation to occur.

2. Placenta Previa

A condition where the placenta covers the uterus opening, either completely or partially. This makes it difficult for your baby’s head to enter the pelvic brim.

3. Intra-Uterine Fetal Death

There are times when the fetus dies inside the womb, and when this happens, the muscle tone starts to degenerate, which results in the fetus falling lower into the uterus.

4. Lax Abnormal Musculature

Women who have had multiple pregnancies may have more relaxed uterine and abdominal muscles. This will make their ability to keep the baby in a normal position very difficult.

5. Uterine Over Distension

There are many reasons why a uterus can become enlarged. Some of these include a large baby, polyhydramnios , multiple pregnancies and others. A uterus that is too large very often leads to shoulder presentation.

6. Polyhydramnios

A very large amount of amniotic fluid that is present in the uterus is known as polyhydramnios. This causes the fetus to be able to move very freely in the uterus and will lead to shoulder presentation.

7. Uterine Abnormalities

There are different abnormalities in the uterus that can cause your baby to move into shoulder presentation. Some of these are the bicornuate uterus, a sub-septate uterus and even a large fibroid  uterus .

Here is how Shoulder presentation diagnosed:

• The top of the mother’s uterus to the top of the pelvic bone is called a fundus. The height of the fundus is an indicator of whether or not the baby is in the shoulder presentation.
• The uterus becomes broader.
• The mother can feel the baby’s head on one abdominal side.
• If shoulder presentation takes place, arms prolapse will cause the baby’s arm to be seen outside the vagina.
• During a vaginal examination, the doctor will be able to feel the babies ribs.

If your doctor identifies that you have shoulder presentation before you go into labour, he will opt for a C-Section instead. If there is a case of neglected shoulder presentation and it is only identified after you go into labour, it becomes very dangerous, and you face many complications. Here are some of the complications that can occur:

1. Cord Prolapse

When the umbilical cord comes out before the fetus does, it is called a cord prolapse and is very dangerous as it can cause the baby’s heart rate to drop, cause changes in blood pressure and even result in brain damage or death of the baby.

2. Ruptured Uterus

The myometrial wall is the middle layer of the wall of the uterine. The breach of this layer during childbirth is a rupture in the uterus, and it is very dangerous for both mother and child.

3. Fetal Hypoxia

When your baby doesn’t get enough oxygen, it will lead to suffocation, and if the necessary measures are not taken, it will result in death.

4. Obstructed Labour

Though contractions are taking place, the baby is not able to come through the birth canal as there is something blocking the way. Failure to diagnose and remedy this condition is a major reason why both mother and child die during childbirth.

5. Trauma to Prolapsed Arm

If there is a prolapsed arm, there is a higher chance that it will be injured or damaged. This injury may be severe and could last for a lifetime.

Here is how Shoulder presentation is managed:

1. C-Section

The first choice for doctors who have a case of shoulder presentation is a C-Section. This is the safest method that ensures the safety of both mother and child.

2. External Cephalic Version

In this procedure, your baby’s heartbeat will be monitored, and you will be given medication through an IV to ensure a relaxed uterus. Your doctor will then place her hands on the outside of your stomach and attempt to turn your baby into the correct position. This is done only before labour starts.

3. Internal Podalic Version

This is only used in the case of twins, where the second twin will need to be moved into a breech position and then extracted.

Though it sounds scary, if you keep a careful track of your baby’s position in the weeks before delivery, you will be able to identify and rectify the problem before it becomes serious. Exercising throughout your pregnancy will be very helpful in ensuring that your baby gets into the correct position for labour.

Also Read:  When Does a Baby Turn Head Down During Pregnancy?

• RELATED ARTICLES
• MORE FROM AUTHOR

Is it Safe to Ride Horse during Pregnancy?

Unborn Baby Kidney Problems in Pregnancy: Causes, Symptoms & Treatment

Breastfeeding While Pregnant—Myths and Facts

Acupuncture in Pregnancy - Benefits and Side Effects

Gestational Sac in Pregnancy - What It Indicates?

Diaper Wreath Decoration for a Baby Shower

Popular on parenting.

245 Rare Boy & Girl Names with Meanings

Top 22 Short Moral Stories For Kids

170 Boy & Girl Names That Mean 'Gift from God'

800+ Unique & Cute Nicknames for Boys & Girls

Latest posts.

Trendy Toddler Boy Haircuts You'll Love

Lightning Mcqueen Coloring Pages - Free Printable Pages For Kids

Rabbit Coloring Pages - Free Printable Pages For Kids

Cat Coloring Pages - Free Printable Pages For Kids

Fetal Presentation, Position, and Lie (Including Breech Presentation)

• Key Points |

Abnormal fetal lie or presentation may occur due to fetal size, fetal anomalies, uterine structural abnormalities, multiple gestation, or other factors. Diagnosis is by examination or ultrasonography. Management is with physical maneuvers to reposition the fetus, operative vaginal delivery , or cesarean delivery .

Terms that describe the fetus in relation to the uterus, cervix, and maternal pelvis are

Fetal presentation: Fetal part that overlies the maternal pelvic inlet; vertex (cephalic), face, brow, breech, shoulder, funic (umbilical cord), or compound (more than one part, eg, shoulder and hand)

Fetal position: Relation of the presenting part to an anatomic axis; for vertex presentation, occiput anterior, occiput posterior, occiput transverse

Fetal lie: Relation of the fetus to the long axis of the uterus; longitudinal, oblique, or transverse

Normal fetal lie is longitudinal, normal presentation is vertex, and occiput anterior is the most common position.

Abnormal fetal lie, presentation, or position may occur with

Fetopelvic disproportion (fetus too large for the pelvic inlet)

Fetal congenital anomalies

Uterine structural abnormalities (eg, fibroids, synechiae)

Multiple gestation

Several common types of abnormal lie or presentation are discussed here.

Transverse lie

Fetal position is transverse, with the fetal long axis oblique or perpendicular rather than parallel to the maternal long axis. Transverse lie is often accompanied by shoulder presentation, which requires cesarean delivery.

Breech presentation

There are several types of breech presentation.

Frank breech: The fetal hips are flexed, and the knees extended (pike position).

Complete breech: The fetus seems to be sitting with hips and knees flexed.

Single or double footling presentation: One or both legs are completely extended and present before the buttocks.

Types of breech presentations

Breech presentation makes delivery difficult ,primarily because the presenting part is a poor dilating wedge. Having a poor dilating wedge can lead to incomplete cervical dilation, because the presenting part is narrower than the head that follows. The head, which is the part with the largest diameter, can then be trapped during delivery.

Additionally, the trapped fetal head can compress the umbilical cord if the fetal umbilicus is visible at the introitus, particularly in primiparas whose pelvic tissues have not been dilated by previous deliveries. Umbilical cord compression may cause fetal hypoxemia.

Predisposing factors for breech presentation include

Preterm labor

Uterine abnormalities

Fetal anomalies

If delivery is vaginal, breech presentation may increase risk of

Umbilical cord prolapse

Birth trauma

Perinatal death

Face or brow presentation

In face presentation, the head is hyperextended, and position is designated by the position of the chin (mentum). When the chin is posterior, the head is less likely to rotate and less likely to deliver vaginally, necessitating cesarean delivery.

Brow presentation usually converts spontaneously to vertex or face presentation.

Occiput posterior position

The most common abnormal position is occiput posterior.

The fetal neck is usually somewhat deflexed; thus, a larger diameter of the head must pass through the pelvis.

Progress may arrest in the second phase of labor. Operative vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery is often required.

Position and Presentation of the Fetus

If a fetus is in the occiput posterior position, operative vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery is often required.

In breech presentation, the presenting part is a poor dilating wedge, which can cause the head to be trapped during delivery, often compressing the umbilical cord.

For breech presentation, usually do cesarean delivery at 39 weeks or during labor, but external cephalic version is sometimes successful before labor, usually at 37 or 38 weeks.

Copyright © 2024 Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates. All rights reserved.

• Cookie Preferences

7.6 Transverse lie and shoulder presentation

A transverse lie constitutes an absolute foeto-pelvic disproportion, and vaginal delivery is impossible.

This is an obstetric emergency, because labour is obstructed and there is a risk of uterine rupture and foetal distress.

7.6.1 Diagnosis

• The uterus is very wide: the transverse axis is virtually equivalent to the longitudinal axis; fundal height is less than 30 cm near term.
• On examination: head in one side, breech in the other (Figures 7.1a and 7.1b). Vaginal examination reveals a nearly empty true pelvis or a shoulder with—sometimes—an arm prolapsing from the vagina (Figure 7.1c).

Figures 7.1 - Transverse lie and shoulder presentation

7.6.2 Possible causes

• Grand multiparity (5 deliveries or more)
• Uterine malformation

Twin pregnancy

• Prematurity
• Placenta praevia
• Foeto-pelvic disproportion

7.6.3 Management

This diagnosis should be made before labour begins, at the last prenatal visit before the birth.

At the end of pregnancy

Singleton pregnancy.

• External version 4 to 6 weeks before delivery, in a CEmONC facility ( Section 7.7 ).
• If this fails, delivery should be carried out by caesarean section, either planned or at the beginning of labour (Chapter 6, Section 6.4.1 ).
• External version is contra-indicated.
• If the first twin is in a transverse lie (unusual): schedule a caesarean section.
• If the second twin is in a transverse lie: there is no indication for caesarean section, but plan delivery in a CEmONC facility so that it can be performed if necessary. Deliver the first twin and then, assess the foetal position and give a few minutes for the second twin to adopt a longitudinal lie. If the second twin stays in a transverse lie, and depending on the experience of the operator, perform external version ( Section 7.7 ) and/or internal version ( Section 7.8 ) on the second twin.

During labour, in a CEmONC facility

Foetus alive and membranes intact.

• Gentle external version, between two contractions, as early as possible, then proceed as with normal delivery.
• If this fails: caesarean section.

Foetus alive and membranes ruptured

• Multipara with relaxed uterus and mobile foetus, and an experienced operator: internal version and total breech extraction.
• Primipara, or tight uterus, or immobile foetus, or engaged arm, or scarred uterus or insufficiently-experienced operator: caesarean section.
• Incomplete dilation: caesarean section.

Caesarean section can be difficult due to uterine retraction. Vertical hysterotomy is preferable. To perform extraction, grasp a foot in the fundus (equivalent to a total breech extraction, but by caesarean section).

Foetus dead

Embryotomy for transverse lie (Chapter 9, Section 9.7.7 ).

During labour, in remote settings where surgery is not available

Try to refer the patient to a CEmONC facility. If not feasible:

• Attempt external version as early as possible.
• If this fails, wait for complete dilation.
• Perform an external version ( Section 7.7 ) combined with an internal version ( Section 7.8 ), possibly placing the woman in various positions (Trendelenburg or knee-chest).
• Put the woman into the knee-chest position.
• Between contractions, push the foetus back and try to engage his head.
• Vacuum extraction (Chapter 5, Section 5.6.1 ) and symphysiotomy (Chapter 5, Section 5.7 ) at the slightest difficulty.
• Incomplete dilation: Trendelenburg position and watchful waiting until complete dilation.

Try to refer the patient, even if referral takes some time. If not feasible, embryotomy for transverse lie (Chapter 9, Section 9.7.7 ).

D. ASHLEY HILL, MD, JORGE LENSE, MD, AND FAY ROEPCKE, MD, MPH

Am Fam Physician. 2020;102(2):84-90

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency in which normal traction on the fetal head does not lead to delivery of the shoulders. This can cause neonatal brachial plexus injuries, hypoxia, and maternal trauma, including damage to the bladder, anal sphincter, and rectum, and postpartum hemorrhage. Although fetal macrosomia, prior shoulder dystocia, and preexisting or gestational diabetes mellitus increases the risk of shoulder dystocia, most cases occur without warning. Labor and delivery teams should always be prepared to recognize and treat this emergency. Training and simulation exercises improve physician and team performance when shoulder dystocia occurs. Unequivocally announcing that dystocia is happening, summoning extra assistance, keeping track of the time from delivery of the head to full delivery of the neonate, and communicating with the patient and health care team are helpful. Calm and thoughtful use of release maneuvers such as knee to chest (McRoberts maneuver), suprapubic pressure, posterior arm or shoulder delivery, and internal rotational maneuvers will almost always result in successful delivery. When these are unsuccessful, additional maneuvers, including intentional clavicular fracture or cephalic replacement, may lead to delivery. Each institution should consider the length of time it will take to prepare the operating room for general inhalational anesthesia and abdominal rescue and practice this during simulation exercises.

Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency in which gentle downward traction of the fetal head does not lead to delivery and additional maneuvers are required to deliver the fetal shoulders. 1 Shoulder dystocia is usually attributed to impaction of the anterior shoulder against the maternal symphysis after delivery of the fetal head; less commonly, it is caused by impaction of the posterior shoulder against the sacral promontory. 2

Shoulder dystocia complicates 0.3% to 3% of all vaginal deliveries. 3 , 4 The exact incidence can be difficult to determine because the diagnosis is subjective and there are no agreed upon diagnostic criteria for shoulder dystocia. Objective criteria of a head-to-body delivery interval of 60 seconds or the need for additional delivery maneuvers are proposed based on the incidence of significantly more birth injuries and lower Apgar scores during these deliveries. 5

Risk Factors and Prevention

Risk factors for shoulder dystocia include fetal macrosomia (odds ratio = 16.1), prior shoulder dystocia (odds ratio = 8.25), and preexisting or gestational diabetes mellitus (odds ratio = 1.8). 6 – 8 Other risk factors include maternal obesity, excessive maternal weight gain during pregnancy, oxytocin (Pitocin) use, prolonged first or second stage labor, and operative vaginal delivery (forceps or vacuum); however, these are poorly predictive of shoulder dystocia. 9 There are no accurate models to predict or prevent shoulder dystocia. 10 , 11

Fetal macrosomia is difficult to accurately predict. At term, fetal sonography has at least a 10% margin of error for diagnosis of macrosomia. 11 Although the incidence of shoulder dystocia increases with increasing fetal weight and maternal diabetes, one study of pregnancies complicated by shoulder dystocia found that half of the neonates weighed less than 4,000 g (8 lb, 13 oz) and that only 20% of the patients had diabetes. 12 Results from studies evaluating labor induction for suspected macrosomia are inconsistent, and induction is not recommended to prevent shoulder dystocia. 13 Given the increased risk of shoulder dystocia with increasing fetal weights, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends consideration of cesarean delivery for a patient who does not have diabetes and is carrying a fetus with an estimated fetal weight of 5,000 g (11 lb). ACOG also recommends consideration of cesarean delivery for a patient who has diabetes and is carrying a fetus with an estimated fetal weight of 4,500 g (9 lb, 15 oz). 10

ACOG and the Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics program recommend that labor and delivery teams conduct regular team training drills that include identification and management of shoulder dystocia. 10 , 14

Complications

Shoulder dystocia can cause several maternal and neonatal complications ( Table 1 ) . 10 The most common maternal complications are postpartum hemorrhage (11%) and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (3.8%). 15 The most common neonatal injuries are brachial plexus injuries and clavicular or humeral fractures. 16 Transient brachial plexus injuries may occur in up to 20% of deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia. 3 Most resolve without permanent disability, although approximately 10% may result in permanent neurologic injury. 17 The head-to-body delivery interval does not predict fetal asphyxia or death. 10 However, due to the potential for serious maternal or neonatal harm, a systematic approach to expeditious delivery is necessary. 10 , 15

Initial Response

Physicians should announce delivery of the fetal head so that an assistant can start a timer. If the fetus fails to deliver using normal traction or if retraction of the fetal head against the perineum (turtle sign) occurs, the physician should announce that there is a shoulder dystocia, and the delivery team should call for additional team members to assist. A longitudinal study of a shoulder dystocia simulation program found a significant reduction in neonatal brachial plexus injuries at discharge (7.6% to 1.3%) when the delivery team performed specified actions during shoulder dystocia deliveries . 18 These included an unequivocal announcement of the shoulder dystocia, calling for additional assistance from qualified personnel, and having an assistant announce the time from delivery of the fetal head every 30 seconds.

Physicians should also obtain assistance from a physician qualified to perform cesarean delivery and someone to resuscitate the neonate. Additional helpful actions that have not been studied include communicating with the patient so that she knows when to push, lowering the bed, using a stool for the assistant applying suprapubic pressure, and having someone record events for precise documentation.

Delivery Maneuvers

If the fetus does not deliver using gentle traction, release maneuvers can be used in a thoughtful and sequential manner to deliver the impacted shoulder ( Figure 1 ) . Aggressive lateral or downward traction on the fetal head and neck should be avoided because it can injure the brachial plexus. 4 There are no randomized trials comparing the various maneuvers used to release an impacted shoulder 10 ( Table 2 10 , 18 , 19 ) . ACOG, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and the Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics program recommend using the McRoberts maneuver first, followed by suprapubic pressure if necessary. 10 , 14 , 19 The McRoberts maneuver, performed by flexing the hips and bringing both knees toward the chest, rotates the symphysis pubis cephalad and further opens the pelvic outlet  ( Figure 2 ) . This is a simple and proven method to manage shoulder dystocia, with a success rate of up to 42% as the sole maneuver. 10 , 15

If delivery does not occur, firm, steady suprapubic pressure should be performed concurrently with the McRoberts maneuver. An assistant should apply firm downward or oblique pressure just above the symphysis pubis toward the side the infant is facing. This decreases the distance between the infant's shoulders (bisacromial distance), potentially assisting anterior shoulder dislodgement ( Figure 3 ) . Fundal pressure increases the risk of uterine rupture. 20

If the McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure are unsuccessful, delivery of the posterior arm should be considered 10 , 14 , 21 ( Figure 4 ) . A retrospective review revealed that the combination of the McRoberts maneuver, suprapubic pressure, and posterior arm delivery resulted in successful delivery within four minutes in 95% of cases. 21 Computer modeling suggests that delivery of the posterior arm results in the least amount of brachial plexus stretch compared with other maneuvers. 22 Delivery of the posterior arm requires patience and communication to keep the patient calm. Training with a birth simulator will likely improve operator confidence and performance of this procedure.

An episiotomy may help depending on the size of the physician's hands and ability to enter the posterior vagina, but it is not mandatory for this or any release maneuver. 23 The physician should apply lubricant, compress all five fingers from the appropriate hand into a “duck-bill” shape, and gently maneuver the hand into the posterior vagina, under the baby (see a video of a posterior arm release ). The physician should then slide the hand along the fetal chest, not the back, up to the fetal hip, or until the posterior hand is identified. Grasping the wrist by forming an OK sign with the physician's thumb and index finger ( Figure 4 ) , he or she should flex the fetal elbow and slide the arm along the fetal chest to deliver from the posterior vagina. Using the operator's fifth finger as a fulcrum by placing it along the fetal elbow may help.

Posterior Arm Release

If the posterior arm is tight against the vaginal sidewall and cannot be delivered, other methods of delivering the posterior shoulder can be used. The Menticoglou maneuver involves placing one finger from each hand under the posterior axilla and applying gentle traction along the curve of the pelvis to deliver the posterior shoulder. 24 After the shoulder delivers, it should be easier to deliver the entire posterior arm. The posterior axilla sling traction maneuver uses a suction catheter or urinary catheter placed under the posterior shoulder axilla to apply downward traction to deliver the posterior shoulder. 25 Alternatively, the physician can use the sling to rotate the posterior shoulder 180 degrees to anterior, similar to the Woods maneuver. A description and video of this technique  is available.

Additional maneuvers include rotational methods (e.g., Rubin II, the Woods or reverse Woods [corkscrew] maneuvers) and rolling the patient to her hands and knees (Gaskin all-fours maneuver). To perform the Rubin II maneuver, the physician places two fingers into the vagina to push the scapula of the anterior fetal shoulder toward the fetal face to attempt to rotate the fetus 30 degrees ( Figure 5 ; see a video of the Rubin II maneuver ).

Rubin II Maneuver

The Woods maneuver combines the hand placement for the Rubin II maneuver with two fingers on the anterior aspect of the posterior fetal shoulder with the intent of rotating the fetus 180 degrees ( Figure 5 ; see a video of the Woods maneuver ). For the reverse Woods maneuver, fingers or hands are placed on the front side of the anterior shoulder and back side of the posterior shoulder to rotate the fetus 180 degrees. An episiotomy may be helpful for the Woods maneuvers to be able to gain access with two hands. The Gaskin all-fours maneuver requires the patient to roll onto her hands and knees. This had an 83% success rate as the sole maneuver used in one series. 26 This maneuver may be more difficult if the patient is fatigued or has neuraxial anesthesia.

Woods Maneuver

Maneuvers for catastrophic shoulder dystocia.

If these maneuvers do not result in delivery, options include performing the maneuvers again ( Figure 1 ) or enlisting assistance from another experienced physician who might try the previously attempted maneuvers again or who can collaborate to attempt less proven maneuvers, such as abdominal rescue, cephalic replacement (Zavanelli maneuver), and intentional clavicular fracture ( Table 3 ) . 10 , 27 , 28 Each institution should consider the length of time it will take to prepare the operating room for general inhalational anesthesia and abdominal rescue and practice this during simulation exercises.

Documentation

Precise documentation is extremely important after a shoulder dystocia to inform the clinical team of the delivery events, including the head-to-body delivery interval and maneuvers used. ACOG has provided a checklist for documenting the occurrence of shoulder dystocia . 29

This article updates a previous article by Baxley and Gobbo . 30

Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key terms shoulder dystocia, shoulder, brachial plexus, and abnormal labor. The search included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and reviews. We also searched Ovid, Clinical Key, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality evidence reports, and Essential Evidence Plus. Search dates: September 5, 2019, and April 13, 2020.

Resnik R. Management of shoulder girdle dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23(2):559-564.

Hankins GD, Clark SL. Brachial plexus palsy involving the posterior shoulder at spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am J Perinatol. 1995;12(1):44-45.

Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, et al. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):657-672.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy. Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy . American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2014.

Beall MH, Spong C, McKay J, et al. Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(4):934-937.

Tsur A, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, et al. Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(5):1225-1229.

Bingham J, Chauhan SP, Hayes E, et al. Recurrent shoulder dystocia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65(3):183-188.

Zhang C, Wu Y, Li S, et al. Maternal prepregnancy obesity and the risk of shoulder dystocia: a meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018;125(4):407-413.

Ouzounian JG, Gherman RB. Shoulder dystocia: are historic risk factors reliable predictors?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(6):1933-1935.

Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 178: shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5):e123-e133.

Gupta M, Hockley C, Quigley MA, et al. Antenatal and intrapartum prediction of shoulder dystocia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(2):134-139.

Ouzounian JG, Korst LM, Miller DA, et al. Brachial plexus palsy and shoulder dystocia: obstetric risk factors remain elusive. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(4):303-307.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin number 173: fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):e195-e209.

Shields SG, Ratcliffe S. Chapter F: labor dystocia. In: Leeman L, Quinlan JD, Dresang LT, et al. Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics Provider Manual . 8th edition. American Academy of Family Physicians; 2017:1–14.

Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Souter I, et al. The McRoberts' maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: how successful is it?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(3):656-661.

Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. Obstetric maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(6):1126-1130.

Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Miller DA, et al. Spontaneous vaginal delivery: a risk factor for Erb's palsy?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(3):423-427.

Grobman WA, Miller D, Burke C, et al. Outcomes associated with introduction of a shoulder dystocia protocol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6):513-517.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder dystocia (green-top guideline No. 42). March 28, 2012. Updated February 2017. Accessed March 11, 2020. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg42/

Sturzenegger K, Schäffer L, Zimmermann R, et al. Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure. J Perinat Med. 2017;45(3):309-313.

Leung TY, Stuart O, Suen SS, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia alleviated by different type and sequence of manoeuvres: a retrospective review. BJOG. 2011;118(8):985-990.

Grimm MJ, Costello RE, Gonik B. Effect of clinician-applied maneuvers on brachial plexus stretch during a shoulder dystocia event: investigation using a computer simulation model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):339.e1-339.e5.

Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S. The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015;70(5):354-362.

Menticoglou SM. A modified technique to deliver the posterior arm in severe shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3 pt 2):755-757.

Cluver CA, Hofmeyr GJ. Posterior axilla sling traction for shoulder dystocia: case review and a new method of shoulder rotation with the sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):784.e1-784.e7.

Bruner JP, Drummond SB, Meenan AL, et al. All-fours maneuver for reducing shoulder dystocia during labor. J Reprod Med. 1998;43(5):439-443.

O'Shaughnessy MJ. Hysterotomy facilitation of the vaginal delivery of the posterior arm in a case of severe shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(4 pt 2):693-695.

Sandberg EC. The Zavanelli maneuver: 12 years of recorded experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(2):312-317.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Patient safety checklist no. 6: documenting shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2 pt 1):430-431.

Baxley EG, Gobbo RW. Shoulder dystocia. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(7):1707-1714. Accessed March 11, 2020. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2004/0401/p1707.html

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in pubmed.

Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions  for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Family Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• PMC11204412

Shoulder Dystocia: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Diagnosis, Prevention, Complications, Prognosis, and Management

Panagiotis tsikouras.

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Dragana, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece; [email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (K.N.); [email protected] (N.K.); moc.liamtoh@dnasiretos (S.A.); moc.liamtoh@itnapmlanoeht (T.N.); rg.oohay@aiklahcikik (K.C.); rg.moc.kooltuo@slvkanaps (V.S.); rg.htud.dem@telokinn (N.N.)

Sonia Kotanidou

Konstantinos nikolettos, nektaria kritsotaki, anastasia bothou.

2 Midwifery Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Alexandra, Vasilissis Sofias Ave. 80, 115 28 Athens, Greece; moc.evilswodniw@uohtobahsatan

Sotiris Andreou

Theopi nalmpanti, kyriaki chalkia, vlassios spanakis, panagiotis peitsidis.

3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Hospital Helena Venizelou, Elenas Venizelou 2, 115 21 Athens, Greece; moc.liamg@nygboidistiep

George Iatrakis

4 Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos 28, 122 43 Egaleo, Greece; rg.awinu@sikartaig

Nikolaos Nikolettos

Associated data.

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

The term dystocia refers to labor characterized by a slow progression with delayed rates or even pauses in the dilation of the cervix or the descent of the fetus. Dystocia describes the deviation from the limits that define a normal birth and is often used as a synonym for the term pathological birth. Shoulder dystocia, also known as the manual exit of the shoulders during vaginal delivery on cephalic presentation, is defined as the “failure of the shoulders to spontaneously traverse the pelvis after delivery of the fetal head”. This means that obstetric interventions are necessary to deliver the fetus’s body after the head has been delivered, as gentle traction has failed. Abnormal labor (dystocia) is expressed and represented in partograms or by the prolongation of the latent phase or by slowing and pausing in the phases of cervical dilatation and fetal descent. While partograms are helpful in visualizing the progress of labor, regular use of them has not been shown to enhance obstetric outcomes considerably, and no partogram has been shown to be superior to others in comparative trials. Dystocia can, therefore, appear in any phase of the evolution of childbirth, so it is necessary to simultaneously assess all the factors that may contribute to its abnormal evolution, that is, the forces exerted, the weight, the shape, the presentation and position of the fetus, the integrity and morphology of the pelvis, and its relation to the fetus. When this complication occurs, it can result in an increased incidence of maternal morbidity, as well as an increased incidence of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Although several risk factors are associated with shoulder dystocia, it has proven impossible to recognize individual cases of shoulder dystocia in practice before they occur during labor. Various guidelines have been published for the management of shoulder dystocia, with the primary goal of educating the obstetrician and midwife on the importance of a preplanned sequence of maneuvers, thereby reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

1. Introduction

The concept of shoulder dystocia has been documented for over two centuries. It is characterized by the anterior shoulder becoming wedged behind the pubic symphysis following the birth of the fetal head. This situation arises when the biacromial diameter exceeds the pelvic diameter. Shoulder dystocia is identified by the requirement for further obstetric interventions to facilitate the delivery of the fetal shoulders during vaginal childbirth, as standard gentle downward traction applied to the head proves insufficient to deliver the anterior shoulder [ 1 , 2 ].

Shoulder dystocia arises when the anterior shoulder becomes trapped beneath the pubic symphysis or, less commonly, the posterior shoulder at the pubic iliac crest. The “turtle point sign” is characterized by the retraction of the fetal head after childbirth towards the perineum following childbirth. Typically, after the delivery of the head, the arm is suffocatingly pressed against the pregnant woman and encounters resistance as the anterior shoulder becomes lodged behind the symphysis pubis [ 3 , 4 ].

Shoulder dystocia comprises 0.15% to 1.7% of all deliveries, though this frequency fluctuates depending on the fetal birth weight [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Hence, it manifests in approximately 0.3% to 1% of neonates weighing between 2.5 and 4 kg at birth, escalating to 5% to 7% in neonates weighing between 4 and 4.5 kg [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. More than half of shoulder dystocia cases involve fetuses with a normal birth weight, rendering it an unpredictable complication [ 3 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. There is evidence that the incidence of shoulder dystocia has increased over time, due to the increasing birth weight of newborns, and is an obstetric emergency. Furthermore, considering that the engagement of the fetal head is a determinant element when deciding on operative vaginal delivery, a transperineal ultrasound with a transvaginal digital examination can add to the avoidance of the deleterious failure of operative vaginal delivery [ 14 ].

2. Diagnosis

In instances where antenatal and perinatal factors are linked to the potential occurrence of shoulder dystocia, it is imperative for all maternity personnel to promptly identify early indicators of this condition, such as the failure of the shoulders to descend. Looking at it objectively, shoulder dystocia is defined as the extension of the time interval between the delivery of the head and the delivery of the shoulders beyond 60 s. A minority of shoulder dystocia deliveries may exhibit the “turtle sign,” characterized by the retraction of the baby’s head, reminiscent of a turtle retracting into its shell, accompanied by a red, swollen face. This phenomenon occurs when the baby’s shoulder becomes obstructed by the maternal pelvis. Dystocia refers to the departure from the parameters that delineate a typical birth process, and, hence, the term “pathological birth” is frequently employed synonymously. In challenging deliveries, there is a discernible sluggish advancement marked by delayed intervals or pauses in cervical dilatation or the descent of the fetus.

Dystocia, depending on their cause, is divided into three major categories:

• (a) Dystocia that comes from the insufficiency of the forces exerted during childbirth, both by the uterus and by the placenta [ 15 ], and aimed at the exit of the fetus. They include the primary or secondary dysfunction of the uterus during the first and second stages of labor and the failure of voluntary expulsive efforts of the epitome during the second stage of labor, respectively.
• (b) Dystocia attributed to fetal factors. They include abnormal shapes, presentations, positions, large fetuses, and congenital anomalies of the fetus.
• (c) Dystocia that stems from congenital or acquired abnormalities affecting the pelvic canal. These anomalies encompass not only structural irregularities of the bony pelvis but also abnormalities related to the soft tissues that contribute to the composition of the pelvic canal [ 15 , 16 ]. The above distinction of dystocia is not absolute, as, in many cases, causes belonging to different categories contribute to the manifestation of dystocia. For example, a narrow pelvis creates the conditions for the appearance of an abnormal shape, presentation, and position of the fetus [ 17 ].

2.1. Dystocia Caused by Maternal Factors

It has been estimated that contractions of at least 15 mmHg are required to achieve cervical dilation, while normal uterine contractions usually have an intensity of 60 mmHg [ 18 ].

We distinguish uterine dysfunctions into two categories:

• (a) Hypotonic dysfunction. Resting basal tone is low, and contractions, although synchronized, have little intensity, failing to achieve cervical dilatation.
• (b) Hypertonic or unco-ordinated dysfunction.

In cases of hypertonic dysfunction, the fundamental resting tone of the uterus is elevated, leading to frequent and prolonged contractions that are ineffective in terms of cervical dilation. Specifically, the lower and middle sections of the myometrium contract more forcefully than the upper portion, and/or there is a lack of synchronization in the impulses originating from the two horns of the uterus. This lack of synchronization inhibits the propagation of contractions as a cohesive downward wave required for achieving dilation.

Epidural anesthesia, chorioamnionitis, and maternal positioning during labor have all been identified as potential contributors to uterine dysfunction. While conflicting viewpoints exist, evidence suggests that mobilization during labor, when not contraindicated, does not pose significant complications for primigravidas. In fact, it is often welcomed by expectant mothers, as it can have a positive impact on their psychological well-being, empowering them with the strength to persevere through childbirth [ 3 , 5 , 13 ].

During the second stage of labor, the descent and delivery of the fetus through the pelvic canal to the vulva are facilitated by both the forces exerted by the uterus and the voluntary expulsive efforts of the mother. The latter is generated by the contraction of the abdominal muscles and can be quite forceful, reaching pressures of 100–150 mmHg [ 19 ]. Their role is considered catalytic and their deficiency can lead to dystocia.

The causes that can lead to a deficiency of the extrusive forces of the healthy parturient are heavy sedation, regional anesthesia, and the voluntary suspension of the extrusive effort due to the intense pain it causes. In other instances, the involvement of the parturient experiencing neuromuscular disorders may be deemed minimal, whereas, in cases of heart disease, there typically exists a relative contraindication [ 19 ]. In such scenarios, delivery may be facilitated through the use of forceps, vacuum extraction, or caesarean section.

2.2. Dystocia Attributed to Fetal Factors

Dystocia attributed to fetal factors include abnormal shapes, presentations, positions, a large fetus, and congenital anomalies of the fetus.

2.2.1. Abnormal Shapes and Presentations

In roughly 97% of pregnancies, the presentation during delivery is cephalic, whereas, in 3%, it is breech. In less than 0.5% of cases, the fetus assumes a transverse or oblique position.

• (a) Occipito-posterior fetal position

In such a position, the occiput of the fetus, specifically the posterior fontanelle which serves as its guiding point, is situated within one of the posterior quadrants of the pelvis, typically the right quadrant. It is observed that the right posterior position occurs approximately five times more frequently than the corresponding left position. It is an unstable-transitional position, since, in most cases (90%), it is directed to the anterior occipital position [ 7 ]. It is the most frequent cause of delay in the progress of childbirth [ 7 ]. The construction of the pelvis (narrow, android, or flattened pelvis), the right deviation of the uterus due to the pressure of the sigmoid, the anterior placenta, and the relaxation of the abdominal walls of the pregnant woman are predisposing factors for the occurrence of the above-mentioned abnormal fetal head presentation [ 20 , 21 ]. Diagnosing the right posterior position is facilitated not only by a vaginal examination but also by the induration often palpated above the pubic symphysis, the increased audibility of fetal heartbeats across a wider area of the abdomen especially after membrane rupture, and the noted delay in the progression of labor [ 7 , 20 , 21 ]. At the same time, the parturient shows intense back pain, as well as a tendency to push out before the dilation is complete, apparently from the pressure exerted by the head on the intestine and the sacrum. Approximately 70% of the time, labor progresses with the head bending perfectly and a significant rotation of 135° into the occipito-anterior position, while, in the remaining 30%, labor occurs with incomplete head bending and a smaller rotation of 45° into the occipito-posterior position [ 7 , 20 , 21 ].

• (b) Occipital transverse position

In this position, the occiput of the fetus, particularly the posterior fontanelle which serves as its guiding point, is situated in a transverse position, either to the right or to the left. It is considered an unstable-transitional projection, since, most of the time, it turns to an anterior occipital position, although it is usually maintained until the descent of the head into the birth canal [ 7 , 20 , 21 ]. It is attributed to the shape of the pelvis (flat pelvis) and the secondary inactivity of the uterus. When the cause is the dysfunction of the uterus, we strengthen the contractions with oxytocin, while, when the time limits of the extrusion stage are exhausted, the solution is given by the embryo wound (metal or suction) or caesarean section depending on the height of the projecting degree [ 7 , 20 , 21 ].

• (c) Parietal presentation

In this position, the fetus’s head protrudes with the parietal bones, forming the dome of the skull. The prominent anterior fontanelle, which acts as its guiding point, is palpated at the center of the pelvis. Moreover, the head is neither flexed nor extended but is rather in a neutral position.

This is an unstable-transitional position, since it often passes into an occipital or, more rarely, into a frontal and personal position. If the labor does not progress and the position remains parietal, delivery via caesarean section is preferred. It is important to emphasize that the use of vacuum extraction is not recommended, as applying vacuum in this position should be directed towards the anterior fontanelle, which is not feasible in this scenario.

• (d) Brow presentation

This presentation, characterized by the fetus presenting with the forehead and the nasion serving as the guiding point, is exceedingly rare. It is classified as an unstable-transitional presentation, often transitioning into either a face or parietal presentation. The appearance of this presentation is attributed to factors such as polyhydramnios, a narrow or deformed pelvis, and prematurity. In most cases, labor progress is delayed or becomes impossible, necessitating delivery via caesarean section. The historical practice of attempting to convert a brow presentation into an occipital position through various manipulations is no longer considered appropriate in modern obstetrics [ 7 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].

• (e) Face presentation

In this presentation, the fetus presents with the face as the leading part. The presenting part is mentum. Depending on the position of the eye, which serves as the guiding point in this type of presentation, it is classified as either anterior or posterior. During the vaginal examination, this presentation can pose a diagnostic challenge as it may be mistaken for a frank breech presentation. This confusion can arise because the mouth may be misidentified as the anus, and the ischial spines may be mistaken for the zygomatic bones [ 3 ]. Among the causes are an elongated neck of the fetus or the umbilical cord coiling, which can result in the extension of the head. Additionally, predisposing factors include the presence of anencephaly-acrania, fetal macrosomia, multiparity, and a narrow pelvis.

The presentation of the fetus plays a crucial role in its delivery process: in an anterior face presentation, vaginal delivery can often proceed spontaneously, whereas, in a posterior presentation, a caesarean section will likely be necessary. In practice, regardless of the presentation, caesarean section is often the chosen approach for face presentation deliveries.

• (f) Occipito-posterior positions

In this presentation, the fetal head becomes wedged with the sagittal diameter aligned with the anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic entrance, either in an occipito-pubic or occipito-sacral position. Diagnosis is typically confirmed through a vaginal examination. The resolution of dystocia through head turning rarely occurs. While the careful administration of oxytocin in cases of insufficient labor may aid in facilitating delivery, more often than not, caesarean section becomes the preferred method of delivery.

The consolidation of the fetal head, indicating its passage into the pelvic inlet where the biparietal diameter has surpassed the level of entry, can be achieved through three methods:

• (1) The two parietal bones should be at the same height; i.e., the sagittal suture should be exactly in the middle of the pelvis. This presentation is characterized as an isocline.
• (2) The posterior parietal bone should be at a lower level, i.e., project, so that the sagittal suture is closer to the anterior wall of the pelvis. This presentation is characterized as posterior asynclitism.
• (3) The anterior parietal bone should be at a lower level, i.e., project, so that the sagittal suture is closer to the posterior wall of the pelvis. This presentation is characterized as anterior asynclitism. The uneven positions of the cephalic presentation are usually presented in a flattened pelvis and are a serious cause of disproportion and dystocia and, most often, lead to a caesarean section [ 20 ].

2.2.2. Large or Overweight Fetus

Typically, the threshold for diagnosing macrosomia is a birth weight between 4000 and 4500 g, or higher. However, achieving a universal agreement on this definition can be challenging due to variations in clinical practice and regional differences. About 10% of newborns are large at birth and 2% are extremely large. Predisposing factors include obesity (>70 kg), diabetes mellitus, maternal weight gain greater than expected for pregnancy (>20 kg), multiparity, prolonged pregnancy, and the history of previous delivery of a large fetus [ 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].

It is estimated that 10% of large fetuses will develop shoulder dystocia. For this reason, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in 2002 issued a guideline for performing a caesarean section for fetuses with an estimated birth weight greater than 5000 g in non-diabetic and 4500 g in diabetic pregnant women [ 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].

2.3. Dystocia Arising from Congenital or Acquired Anomalies of the Pelvic Canal

They include the anomalies of the bony pelvis and the soft tissues, which participate in the structure of the pelvic canal [ 22 , 23 , 24 ].

Radiological studies by Caldwell and Moloy, in the first half of the 20th century, led to the classification of the female pelvis into four types:

• (1) The female type pelvis (41.4%) is characterized by a round or slightly oval entrance with large diameters between the ischial spines and the ischial tuberosities. Women with this type of pelvis typically have a girth span greater than their shoulder span. This type of female pelvis is not typically associated with dystocia problems.
• (2) The android type (32.5%) is characterized by a triangular-wedge-shaped entrance with the apex at the pubic symphysis and a shorter diameter between the ischial spines. Women with this type of pelvis have the same opening in the circumference and shoulders.
• (3) The humanoid type (23.5%) is characterized by an oval entrance with an anteroposterior diameter greater than the transverse one. It looks like the pelvis of great apes.
• (4) The flat-bellied type (2.6%) is characterized by an oval entrance with a transverse diameter greater than the anterior one.

The last three types often present dystocia problems. According to Cadwell’s observations on the Hellenes, the distribution of the aforementioned types is as follows: gynoid (72%), android (23.7%), anthropoid (3%), and platypyeloid (1.3%). Mixed types of female pelvis, combining characteristics of these types, are frequently observed, and significant racial differences have been noted [ 22 , 23 , 24 ].

However, apart from the type of pelvis, it is possible to have acquired abnormalities in its formation, most of the time as a result of the fracture of the innominate bones after traffic accidents. In the past, pathological conditions of the bones, such as rickets, were a frequent cause of a narrow and deformed pelvis.

The diagnosis of a narrow pelvis with a reduction in the diameters of the inlet, the vasculature, the stricture, and the outlet can be carried out with clinical pyelometry, radiological control, and pyelometry with axial or magnetic tomography. Many times, however, the assessment is difficult, with the result that the pelvis must be “tried in labor” before the definitive diagnosis is made.

• (b) Abnormalities of the soft tissues

Abnormalities of the soft tissues involved in the structure of the pelvic canal can be causes of dystocia. Among them are isthmic fibroids of the uterus, appendage tumors, colon tumors, and bladder distention.

3. Frequency of Dystocia

In contemporary discussions, cephalopelvic disproportion is frequently mentioned as a determining factor necessitating the termination of labor through a caesarean section. The term cephalopelvic disproportion was used as early as the 19th century to describe the disproportion between the diameters of the fetal head and the pelvic canal, through which it will have to pass during delivery.

It accurately depicted the instances of pregnant women afflicted with rickets, leading to a constricted pelvis, which affected up to 15% of cases in certain regions at the outset of the 20th century. However, such severe cephalopelvic disproportion, rendering childbirth progression impossible, is now uncommon, with the term often misapplied in contemporary usage.

Most of the time, it is a relative disproportion, in which the delivery can be completed with great difficulty and usually with some obstetric intervention [ 7 , 25 , 26 ]. Excluding cases of absolute disproportion, which can be diagnosed clinically and through ultrasound, most instances of dystocia are identified during or after labor.

Dystocia is the most common indication for a first caesarean section. As a history of caesarean section often leads to subsequent delivery by caesarean section, it has been estimated that dystocia accounts for approximately 50–60% of caesarean sections performed in the US [ 7 , 25 , 26 ]. In general, the rate of dystocia in primipara is less than 10% [ 7 , 25 , 26 ].

Recently, there has been a suggestion that the observed rise in the rate of dystocia today may be attributed to the rapid changes in environmental conditions and lifestyle outpacing the pace of evolution, as defined by Darwin’s theory of natural selection in physics [ 27 , 28 ].

4. Pathophysiology of Shoulder Dystocia

In the time interval between the birth of the head and the body of the fetus (head-to-body delivery time), the fetus develops acidosis, which can lead to hypoxia. Fetal acidosis can result from various factors, including the compression of the umbilical cord or neck vessels, congestion in the fetal venous network, the stimulation of the brain’s vagus nerve leading to bradycardia, or a combination of these elements. The regulation of fetal cardiac function is primarily governed by the autonomic nervous system, with minimal influence from the somatic nervous system.

Fluctuations between the parasympathetic and sympathetic systems determine the basic variability of FHR [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].

The body’s nervous system causes the accelerations that constitute it as a result of the CNS action for fetal control movements. The action of the sympathetic system is essential for fetal survival and causes an increase in FHR. Conversely, the parasympathetic system decreases the fetal heart rate as a result of the stimulation of the carotid sinus chemoreceptors and of the aortic arch and peripherally located baroreceptors in the carotid bulb and aorta and centrally in the brain [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The stimulation of baroreceptors, induced by the pressure from the umbilical cord and the fetal head, contributes to a reduction in fetal heart rate (FHR), as evidenced by short-duration occurrences of variable decelerations [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].

Chemoreceptors are stimulated by the increase in hydrogen ions, the accumulation of CO 2 , and the decrease in the partial pressure of oxygen. The increase in the secretion of catecholamines is a reaction product in the upcoming fetal distress and manifests as a slowly evolving increase in FHR as a result of vasoconstriction and the redistribution of its flow blood to vital organs. The fetal stress response involves the release of catecholamines from the adrenal glands. The fetus’s capacity to withstand the stress induced by contractions and the pressure from the umbilical cord depends on its normal reserves, as well as on factors such as the presence of infection or meconium-stained amniotic fluid. The contractions of the myometrium during labor compress the fetal structures, including the umbilical cord, leading to significant alterations in the intrauterine environment. A reduced uteroplacental reserve is a consequence of pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth retardation, prematurity, or pregnancy prolongation. The main goal of cardiotocography, especially in cases of shoulder dystocia, is to assess the degree of adequacy of the fetoplacental unit and the early detection of changes in the fetal heart rate indicative of fetal hypoxia, as well as the effectiveness of actions in preventing unwanted events depending on the timeliness of their implementation.

Hypoxemia (hypoxaemia) describes the condition in which there is a decrease in blood supply at the level of the placenta and umbilical cord and a decrease in oxygenation in the peripheral circulation of the fetus. This condition is often observed during normal childbirth; it is a result of uterine contractions, and most fetuses cope adequately for a long time with the occurrence of such episodes without establishing damage.

Hypoxia describes the situation where there is an interruption of blood supply for longer periods resulting in a decrease in the oxygenation of peripheral tissues and organs of the fetus. When hypoxia persists for more extended periods, the fetus activates the anaerobic metabolism that leads to the establishment of metabolic acidosis [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].

In fetuses with a reduced reserve such as intrauterine growth retardation, or prematurity or infection, the establishment of metabolic acidosis occurs earlier. The term asphyxia describes the extremely adverse situation in which there is a major worsening or prolonged interruption of reduced oxygenation leading to the inability to respond to compensatory mechanisms and the establishment of a combination of metabolic acidosis and hypoxia [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].

This leads to significant damage to vital organs such as the CNS and possibly intrauterine death. Long-term or chronic hypoxia is due to a reduction in placental blood flow for a long period of time associated with chronic pathological conditions such as pre-eclampsia or intrauterine growth retardation.

Before delivery, the fetus copes for a long time by redistributing blood flow to vital organs by slowing the rate of intrauterine growth and by controlling the increase in lactic acid levels. During delivery, this hypoxia is identified by a significant decrease in removing volatility and the emergence of repeated late slowdowns.

Gradually developing hypoxia is characterized by the abolition of the accelerations, the increase in the FHR, and the reduction in the variability over time. The decelerations become larger and of longer duration with a concomitant reduction in the duration of the intervals with the worsening of the hypoxia.

The presence of such a severity of hypoxic insult causes the fetal reaction expressed initially by:

• the appearance of either variable decelerations (due to the compression of the umbilical cord) or the appearance of late decelerations (due to placental insufficiency);
• the disappearance of accelerations (the result of an effort to conserve energy);
• the gradual increase in FHR (due to hypoxia and the increase in catecholamine secretion);
• the deepening and increase in the range of decelerations (with increasing hypoxia of the myocardium);
• a progressive abolition of variability (due to a greater lack of oxygen resulting in autonomic nervous system depression) [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].

Acute hypoxia is characterized by a sudden decrease in placental/umbilical blood flow and develops over a short period (minutes). Causes include acute events such as placental abruption, hypertension, or uterine rupture. Recordings show prolonged decelerations progressing to bradycardia.

Immediate treatment is required by arranging the delivery or eliminating hypertonia. Subacute hypoxia is due to a recurrent compression of the umbilical cord. It worsens in cases of oligohydramnios or the prolongation of pregnancy, especially in the 20th stage of labor. The fact that hypoxic attacks have a slow progression at first and they are persistent after a sufficient period allows the gradual adaptation of the fetus.

These adaptive actions begin to lose their effectiveness when severe metabolic acidosis sets in (Ph ≤ 7) with the suppression of myocardial function, reduction in vascular tone, and establishment of hypotension, and ischemic brain damage. The pH in the fetal circulation decreases by 0.01–0.04 units/min. In general, the obstetrician typically has approximately 5 min, assuming the fetus is well-oxygenated, before the risk of severe hypoxia arises [ 2 , 33 , 34 , 35 ].

5. Clinical Manifestations of Dystocia

Dystocia, which, as we mentioned, is characterized by a slow progression with delayed rhythms or even pauses in the dilation of the cervix or the descent of the fetus, in practice, manifests itself in a prolongation of the latent phase, a slowing down or even a pause in the active phase, and with an extension of the extrusion stage.

To fully understand the conditions related to dystocia, some introductory data for normal labor are necessary.

5.1. Normal Labor

Normal labor is characterized by uterine contractions of progressively increasing intensity, frequency, and duration, which aim to efface and dilate the cervix and the descent and exit of the fetus

It is divided into three stages:

This is divided into two sub-phases: the latent and the active.

• (1) The latent phase commences at the onset of labor, marked by the gradual effacement and initial dilation of the cervix, until it reaches a dilation of 3–4 cm. Based on new data, the diagnosis of the latent phase is based on the presence of contractions, cervical dilation < 6 cm on digital examination, slow cervical change, and clinician judgment. The upper time limits of this phase have been determined at 20 h for primiparous and 14 h for multiparous [ 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. During this phase, the uterine contractions are of a relatively low intensity, short duration, and variable frequency.
• (2) The active phase ensues, culminating with the complete dilation of the cervix. In this phase, the contractions increase in intensity, frequency, and duration. The upper time limits have been set at 12 and 6 h for primiparous and multiparous, respectively [ 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. At the same time, the minimum dilation rate limits have been established at 1.2 cm/h for primiparous and 1.5 cm/h for multiparous. Another parameter is the descent rate of the fetal head, which should be greater than 1 cm/h and 2 cm/h for primiparous and multiparous, respectively [ 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].
• (b) The second stage or stage of extrusion

It begins with the full dilation of the cervix and ends with the exit of the fetus. The average duration of this stage is 50 min for the primiparous and 20 min for the multiparous. The upper time limits are considered to be 2 h for the first-born and 1 h for the first-born, added by 1 additional hour in case the pregnant woman has undergone regional anesthesia [ 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].

5.2. Shoulder Dystocia

Shoulder dystocia occurs when the biacromial diameter of the fetus is sufficiently large to impede or prevent the passage of the shoulders through the pelvic canal. Reported incidences of shoulder dystocia vary widely, with an estimated occurrence of approximately 1 in 150 (0.7%) of vaginal births. While there is a correlation between shoulder dystocia and fetal weight, fetal weight alone is not a reliable prognostic indicator for predicting its occurrence.

The frequency of shoulder dystocia ranges from 0.15% to 1.7%. However, many cases may go undiagnosed because preventive measures are often taken when its occurrence is considered possible.

Among the risk factors for the manifestation of shoulder dystocia are all factors that predispose to a large or macrosomic fetus.

Shoulder dystocia is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. Injuries of the brachial plexus are not rare and occur during its stretching, from the excessive pulling of the fetal head in the attempt to exit the anterior shoulder. Clavicle fractures often accompany shoulder dystocia. It is thought that, when isolated, they have no particular clinical significance.

In prolonged dystocia, it is possible to observe fetal distress, suffocation, and death. Maternal complications of shoulder dystocia are postpartum hemorrhage from subsequent uterine atony, genital injuries, and postoperative infections in caesarean sections due to the reinsertion of the fetus’s head from the potentially septic environment of the vagina and perineum into the intrauterine cavity during the transabdominal delivery of the fetus. The treatment of shoulder dystocia involves a series of maneuvers aimed at releasing the shoulders and facilitating the delivery of the fetal trunk. Initially, gentle traction is applied to the fetal head while simultaneously exerting an extrusive effort from the placenta. If not already performed, a wide perineotomy is recommended. After clearing the newborn’s mouth and nose, gentle traction on the head is repeated while an assistant applies moderate suprapubic pressure.

This is followed by the McRoberts maneuver, with a strong flexion of the femur’s thighs toward the abdominal wall to straighten the sacrum and spine [ 21 , 36 ]. Most cases of shoulder dystocia are treated with these maneuvers. In a different case, Woods’ rotary maneuver is performed, to release the anterior shoulder, and, if this fails, the exit of the posterior shoulder of the fetus is attempted first [ 37 ].

Finally, as a last resort, inducing a fracture of the anterior clavicle or humerus and the Zavanelli maneuver with the reinsertion of the head into the pelvic canal and emergency caesarean section will assist in delivery [ 38 ]. Others have been described, which are not often applied today, such as the Rubin I and II manipulations and the manipulation proposed by Hibbard [ 26 , 39 ]. Symphysiotomy will only be performed in a case where all previous attempts have failed, with dubious results, as it is accompanied by significant maternal morbidity [ 40 , 41 ].

5.2.1. Prolongation of the Latent Phase

We have an extension of the latent phase when its duration exceeds 20 h for primipara and 14 h for multipara. Causes include heavy sedation, regional anesthesia, immaturity of the cervix (low Bishop score), and false labor [ 6 , 9 , 16 , 17 ]. The latter refers to irregular contractions without a progressive increase in intensity, duration, and frequency. These contractions do not lead to the dilation of the cervix and are typically accompanied by discomfort in the lower abdomen. They are further weakened by the administration of sedative drugs.

After excluding the possibility of false labor, which reaches 10% of cases, the prolongation of the latent phase should be treated with rest and waiting, since 85% will automatically proceed to the active phase of labor, while the remaining 5% will require the administration of oxytocin [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Amniotomy should be avoided due to the possibility of false labor. Certainly, if there are indications necessitating the delivery of fetus, such as the prolonged rupture of fetal membranes or abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, waiting should be replaced by expediting delivery, with caesarean section being considered if other methods fail.

5.2.2. Prolongation or Slowing Down of the Active Phase

When the active phase exceeds 12 h for the primipara and 6 h for the multipara, it is considered prolonged. We have a slowing of the active phase when the rate of cervical dilation is less than 1.2 cm/h in primiparous and 1.5 cm/h in multiparous, or the rate of descent of the fetal head is less than 1 cm/h and 2 cm/h for primigravida and multigravida, respectively.

The causes include heavy sedation, regional anesthesia, and abnormal projections of the fetus [ 31 , 32 ].

After ruling out disproportion and ensuring there are adequate uterine contractions, it is advisable to adopt a wait-and-see approach. In cases of sluggish myometrial activity, interventions such as amniotomy and the initiation of oxytocin administration are recommended. If cervical dilation fails to progress by at least 2 cm within the next 4 h despite these measures, caesarean section is indicated.

5.2.3. Pause of the Active Phase

The Cessation of cervical dilatation for at least 2 h or the cessation of fetal descent for 1 h is characterized as a pause in the active phase of labor. Newer trends support increasing the follow-up time limit, before the diagnosis of cessation of dilatation is made, from 2 to 4 h [ 43 , 44 ]. The causes include the relative disproportion due to the abnormal presentation or position of the fetus, with the possible secondary exhaustion of the myometrium.

If the latter case is ruled out, the solution proposed is the reinforcement of contractions with oxytocin and/or amniotomy. If cervical dilation does not increase by 2 cm within the next 4 h, caesarean section is indicated [ 43 , 44 ].

5.2.4. Extension of the Expulsion Stage

During the second stage of labor, if it extends beyond 2 h for primiparous women or 1 h for multiparous women, with an additional hour permitted in the case of regional anesthesia administration, this delineates the prolongation of the expulsion stage [ 7 , 25 , 26 ]. The causes include the disproportion and inadequacy of the forces exerted by the uterus and the placenta. As the dilation of the cervix is completed, the placenta feels the need to push out.

Myometrial contractions are enhanced by the administration of oxytocin, after absolute disproportion has previously been ruled out, while further management includes fetal ulceration using a suction or metallic embryonator, if the height of the projecting degree is below the +2 point and the caesarean section, in case it is above it.

In the context of dystocia, in the sense of pathological labor, the case of rapid progression of labor, called acute labor, is often considered.

5.2.5. Precipitous Labor

It is characterized by rapid development and termination within 3 h. The frequency is approximately 2% [ 23 ]. The related term precipitous labor includes those cases where the cervical dilation rate is at least 5 cm/h for primiparous and 10 cm/h for multiparous. The complications of acute labor concern both the mother and the fetus. Pre-eclampsia may present with the rupture of the uterus and general injuries of the pelvic canal, embolism of amniotic fluid, and uterine weakness after hysterectomy.

The newborn can manifest hypoxygenemia, due to the frequent and intense contractions of the uterus, which obstruct the feto-placental circulation. Intracranial and brachial plexus injuries have been associated with acute delivery, while the neonate may suffer injuries from a fall to the ground if delivery occurs in an inappropriate location without obstetric monitoring. In this case, the lack of personnel qualified to perform resuscitation of the newborn should also be taken into account, if this is required [ 7 , 25 , 26 ].

Various ways of slowing down and controlling acute labor have been attempted, such as the administration of analgesics and tocolytics and general anesthesia with halothane or isoflurane, but with dubious results. What should not be omitted is the immediate discontinuation of oxytocin, if it is administered. Given that a history of acute labor raises the probability of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies, it would be advisable to plan for the induction of labor and placental delivery shortly before the anticipated delivery date.

6. Prevention—Prediction

Several risk factors implicated in the pathogenesis of shoulder dystocia may arise before or during normal vaginal delivery, thereby increasing the likelihood of its occurrence. However, these factors alone are insufficient to reliably predict dystocia, as there are instances of dystocia occurring without the presence of these risk factors. Furthermore, most cases of dystocia cannot be anticipated or prevented due to the lack of accurate methods for identifying embryos at risk of developing this complication [ 19 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].

The main risk factors that can appear before delivery are fetal macrosomia, gestational or pre-existing diabetes mellitus, and a history of shoulder dystocia in a previous delivery. Risk factors that occur during labor are the administration of oxytocin, prolonged first and second stages of labor, and invasive vaginal delivery using a suction or metallic embryo tube [ 19 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].

Other minor risk factors are a history of a macrosomic fetus in a previous pregnancy, maternal short stature, maternal obesity, pelvic anomalies, multiparity, and prolonged gestation. It is understood that efforts are being made to improve some of the risk factors that appear during pregnancy so that there is a better prognosis and management of childbirth, despite the great difficulty in predicting shoulder dystocia [ 19 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].

If there is a clinical suspicion of macrosomia, performing an ultrasound examination of fetal development can help to make important clinical and interventional decisions; however, it has limited preventive and diagnostic accuracy. In cases of gestational diabetes mellitus, in order to prevent macrosomia, it is advisable to closely manage diabetes through the adherence to a diabetic diet, regular monitoring of glucose levels, and administration of insulin by an endocrinologist if deemed necessary. Infants born to diabetic mothers face a two- to four-fold higher risk of experiencing shoulder dystocia compared to infants born to non-diabetic mothers of similar weight. In overweight or obese women (BMI > 25), physical exercise combined with an appropriate dietary treatment is recommended to reduce the possibility of a macrosomic fetus. During pregnancy, the recommended weight gain is 11.5 kg to 16 kg for women with a normal body mass index [ 19 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].

In the general population, physical exercise is recommended before or during pregnancy in order to limit the possibility of gestational diabetes, macrosomia of the fetus, and excessive weight gain during pregnancy.

To achieve a better prevention of shoulder dystocia, the induction of labor, as well as caesarean section, can be applied. The elective induction of labor based on suspected macrosomia is not a reasonable strategy and does not improve perinatal outcome [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ].

The elective induction of labor may be considered for women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus and suspected macrosomia, provided they have reached a gestational age exceeding 39 weeks and possess an appropriately prepared cervix. Elective caesarean section may be warranted when the estimated fetal weight exceeds 4500 g and is coupled with maternal gestational diabetes, or when the estimated fetal weight surpasses 5000 g without concurrent gestational diabetes [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ].

During labor, in the case of macrosomia of the fetus and the impossibility of the progression of the second stage of labor (expulsion), assisted vaginal birth should be avoided and caesarean section should be performed. Elective caesarean section should be recommended in the case of a history of shoulder dystocia in a previous birth, as the rate of recurrence of dystocia in subsequent births is 10 times higher than in the general population.

The complications of shoulder dystocia are divided into maternal and neonatal. The increase in maternal morbidity is mainly due to postpartum bleeding that can come from uterine atony, cervical tears, and vaginal and perineal tears. The dissection of the symphysis pubis and rupture of the uterus are less commonly recorded. The incidence of the above complications does not appear to be affected by the number or type of manipulations applied to treat shoulder dystocia, except for symphysis pubis dissection and transient uterine neuralgia associated with the McRoberts manipulation mentioned below [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ].

Neonatal morbidity is usually associated with fetal injury occurring in 17% to 25%, with brachial plexus paresis being the most common. This complication arises usually in 7% to 20% of fetuses with shoulder dystocia. Usually, lesions of the right brachial plexus are more common than the left, probably because of the more frequent left anterior occipital position of the fetus.

Brachial plexus paresis is classified into Erb’s paresis, Klumpke’s paresis, and mixed brachial plexus palsies. Erb’s paresis is the most common and involves the A5 to A6 nerve roots. Klumpke’s paresis is rarer and involves nerve roots A8 to T1. Mixed paresis involving nerve roots A5 to T1 are ranked last [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ].

Most brachial plexus injuries resolve during the neonatal period, usually within six to twelve months, with no or minimal neurological deficit. However, 10% of cases of Erb’s palsy never resolve. Further neonatal injuries associated with neonatal morbidity in shoulder dystocia include clavicle fracture and humerus fracture [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ].

Clavicle fractures typically heal without complications, although some cases may involve an associated injury to the lungs and underlying vessels. Humerus fractures typically heal without resulting deformities [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ].

In addition to neonatal trauma, additional complications associated with neonatal morbidity in shoulder dystocia are fetal hypoxia, ischemic encephalopathy, and even neonatal death. The latter complications are because, after the delivery of the head, the umbilical cord is pressed between the body of the fetus and the maternal pelvis

Thus, the rapid recognition and decisive treatment of shoulder dystocia is necessary to avoid permanent neonatal damage [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ].

8. Management

A variety of dystocia manipulations have been described to free the anterior shoulder from its wedged position behind the maternal symphysis pubis.

The purpose of these manipulations is to increase the size of the maternal pelvis, reduce the biacromial diameter, and change the biacromial diameter inside the pelvis.

In women with risk factors, the obstetrician should use the ‘shoulder delivery immediately after head exit’ maneuver to allow the fetus to be delivered without interruption until the anterior shoulder exits.

In case of entrapment, the initial treatment will include the slight downward traction of the fetal head alongside the pushing efforts of the mother. The bending, twisting, and sudden movement of the neck should be avoided to avoid damaging the fetal brachial plexus.

Pressure on the bottom of the uterus is contraindicated, as it does not offer any help and, instead, increases the wedging with the risk of injury to the fetus and the mother [ 59 , 60 , 61 ].

The need for a perineotomy should always be considered and evaluated. A wide perineotomy does not directly solve the problem because the soft tissues are not involved, but it provides the necessary space for performing intravaginal manipulations.

8.1. Initial Treatments for Shoulder Dystocia

• (a) McRoberts maneuver

The McRoberts maneuver is one of the first and simplest steps in treating shoulder dystocia. To perform the maneuver, the thighs are bent with a little abduction so that they touch the abdomen of the patient. In this way, an increase in the anteroposterior diameter of the pelvis is achieved as well as a straightening of the lumbar lordosis of the spine (pronouncement of the obstetrician); 40% of shoulder dystocia are successfully treated with the McRoberts maneuver [ 62 , 63 , 64 ].

• (b) Suprapubic pressure

The suprapubic pressure maneuver is a fundamental aspect of managing shoulder dystocia. This technique involves applying pressure above the pubic bone on the anterior shoulder of the fetus, aiming to adduct the shoulders. Simultaneously, gentle traction is continued by the obstetrician. Initially, the pressure should be continuous and then transition to a rhythmic pattern, similar to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. When combined with the McRoberts maneuver, this approach successfully resolves shoulder dystocia in over 50% of cases.

• (c) Intravaginal Maneuver

In addition to the primary maneuver described above, there are also intravaginal techniques available for managing shoulder dystocia. These include the Rubin manipulation, the Woods Screw maneuver, the reverse Woods Screw maneuver, and the maneuver for displacing the posterior upper limb from the birth canal. During the Rubin maneuver, the obstetrician’s hand is inserted behind the anterior shoulder, applying pressure in the direction of the fetal chest.

• (d) The Woods Screw maneuver

The technique, first described by C.E. Woods in 1943, is an intravaginal manipulation performed concurrently with the Rubin maneuver. In this maneuver, the obstetrician’s second hand approaches the posterior shoulder from the anterior surface of the fetus, reinforcing the effort to rotate the shoulder in the same direction as the Rubin manipulation.

Another maneuver involves placing the obstetrician’s hands behind the posterior shoulder and in front of the anterior shoulder, attempting to rotate the fetus in the opposite direction to the previous manipulations (reverse Woods Screw maneuver).

Another intravaginal maneuver is the movement of the posterior upper limb into the genital canal to reduce the diameter of the shoulders. To perform this maneuver, the obstetrician inserts his hand into the vagina trying to reach the posterior upper end of the fetus. After the forearm is reached, the elbow is bent so that the forearm comes out in front of the fetal chest. The traction should not be sharp to avoid fracturing the upper extremity.

In this way, the posterior upper extremity exits, and, thus, the anterior shoulder descends lower than the pubic symphysis facilitating delivery.

• (e) The knee–elbow position

The maneuver of the knee–elbow position is effective, safe, and fast.

During this maneuver, it is crucial that we position the mother in the knee–elbow position. This position facilitates an increase in pelvic diameters: the strait is augmented by approximately 10 mm, and the transverse measurement of the pelvic outlet can increase by up to 20 mm.

During rotation and with the help of gravity, the anterior fetal shoulder is often released. It is important, in this case, to pull the fetus downwards, trying to achieve the delivery of the posterior shoulder.

• (f) Clavicle fracture

An alternative way of dealing with shoulder dystocia is a clavicle fracture.

During this manipulation, upward pressure is applied to the middle of the clavicle to prevent damage to the subclavian vessels.

8.2. Last-Resort Treatments for Shoulder Dystocia

• (a) Zavanelli procedure

Ultimately, the last-resort procedures for managing shoulder dystocia encompass the Zavanelli procedure, abdominal surgery with hysterotomy, and symphysiotomy. During the Zavanelli maneuver, efforts are made to reposition the fetal head, followed by an emergency caesarean section. The fetal head is gently pushed back against the delivery mechanism, and pressure is sustained until the caesarean section can be performed. Tocolysis is typically administered before commencing the procedure.

During abdominal surgery with hysterotomy, vaginal delivery is facilitated, as the fetus is rotated as in the intra-abdominal Woods Screw maneuver. Symphysiotomy is conducted under local anesthesia following bladder catheterization. This is followed by the separation of the fibrocartilage of the pubic symphysis. Given that the procedure requires at least two minutes from the decision-making moment, it is essential to initiate it within five to six minutes following the birth of the infant’s head.

• (b) Symphysiotomy

Symphysiotomy is conducted under local anesthesia following bladder catheterization. This is followed by the separation of the fibrocartilage of the pubic symphysis. Given that the procedure requires at least two minutes from the decision-making moment, it is essential to initiate it within five to six minutes following the birth of the infant’s head. Symphysiotomy should be used only when other manipulations have failed and caesarean section is not possible [ 62 , 63 , 64 ].

8.3. Overall Management

The early diagnosis and immediate treatment of shoulder dystocia lead to a better maternal and neonatal outcome. Research data indicate that the rate of fetal hypoxia and death is reduced if the time between the delivery of the head and body is less than 5 min. Once shoulder dystocia is diagnosed, it is crucial to refrain from applying any additional traction, apart from the standard gentle traction required for shoulder delivery in normal vaginal births. Excessive traction along the axis of the fetal spine should be avoided, as it may result in serious injuries to the mother and severe neurological damage to the newborn.

The attending physician or midwife should discontinue any extrusive labor efforts exacerbating shoulder impingement, while simultaneously alleviating fundal pressure, as it can heighten the risk of vaginal complications and uterine rupture. Consequently, further manipulations during delivery should be conducted by the practitioner with the assistance of specialized and knowledgeable personnel.

According to the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and the obstetric emergency management and treatment program (ALSO), the HELPERR algorithm is proposed as an important clinical tool for shoulder dystocia.

All technical steps are equally important and must be carried out adequately; a time of 30–60 s is recommended for each manipulation:

Help, Evaluate (for episiotomy), Legs (McRoberts’ position), Pressure (suprapubic), Enter (rotational maneuvers), Remove (posterior arm), and Roll (hands and knees).

Upon immediate recognition of dystocia, it is imperative to summon additional personnel for the delivery, including extra midwives, and nursing staff, as well as specialists in resuscitation and postnatal care. It is essential to ensure the presence of an anesthesiologist. The availability of staff may vary depending on the Health Unit where the delivery occurs. Furthermore, it is advisable to conduct the annual participation of maternity staff in specialized seminars to facilitate their continuous training and updates. Despite the extensive research conducted on perineotomy, there is no evidence supporting its efficacy for the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia. The perineotomy application alone does not resolve the problem. However, it can be beneficial in situations where space is limited. For instance, when there is insufficient room in the vagina for the obstetrician’s hand, a perineotomy can facilitate access for intravaginal manipulations.

As perineotomy is quite difficult after the delivery of the head and can cause injury to the newborn, the obstetrician should evaluate its utility and resort to it before delivery if dystocia is suspected. Finally, perineotomy has been blamed for increased rates of severe perineal tears.

McRobert’s maneuver is often the initial step in addressing shoulder dystocia, as it is relatively simple and less invasive compared to other manipulations. This maneuver involves bending and abducting the thighs of the mother so that they come into contact with her anterior abdominal wall. This action straightens the lumbar spine and increases the anterior–posterior diameter of the pelvis. During the maneuver, the bed should be completely flat, with all pillows beneath it removed, and assistance from the staff on either side of the bed is necessary to bend the thighs appropriately. Gentle traction is then applied to facilitate the delivery of the anterior shoulder.

This maneuver is effective in up to 90% of cases, with better results if combined with suprapubic pressure. If the delivery of the fetus does not occur in 30–60 s, a subsequent manipulation is attempted.

Suprapubic pressure (Rubin maneuver 1) is applied by an assistant, on the mother’s side, whose hands are placed on the anterior shoulder. Its purpose is to reduce the biacromic diameter, with the palmar surface of the assistant’s hand down and to the side, on the posterior surface of the anterior shoulder, so that it can be released and pass through the pubic symphysis

It can be applied alongside the McRoberts maneuver while the obstetrician applies gentle traction. Pressure is applied as in CPR, and there is no clear difference in the effectiveness of continuous and rhythmic pressure. If the method fails, in 30–60 s, a further operation should follow.

Intravaginal maneuvers attempt to rotate the fetus so that the anterior pubic symphysis is released and passed. The Rubin II maneuver is performed by inserting the obstetrician’s fingers behind the anterior shoulder, and applying rotational pressure to the fetal chest wall.

It can also be applied alongside the McRoberts manipulation. If this fails, it can be combined with the Wood maneuver, in which the obstetrician uses the fingers of the other hand, with which he applies rotational pressure in the same direction as that of Rubin I, on the anterior surface of the posterior shoulder. A perineotomy is deemed necessary for this operation. If both of these manipulations fail, the reverse Wood manipulation may be followed, in which rotational pressure is applied with the fingers behind the posterior shoulder to rotate it into the oblique plane [ 63 , 64 , 65 ]. After the shoulder rotation maneuvers prove ineffective, the next step involves attempting delivery of the entire posterior upper limb. This is achieved by applying traction and flexion to the posterior elbow, bringing it in front of the fetal chest, followed by the traction and delivery of the posterior upper limb from the hand up to the shoulder. This technique facilitates the delivery of the fetus. However, it is important to note that this particular method is associated with humerus fractures, with a reported frequency ranging from 2% to 12% [ 56 , 57 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ].

The knee–elbow position of the epitome is effective, with a success rate of up to 83% in cases of dystocia. Depending on the circumstances, the obstetrician will attempt to turn the patient into this position either before or after attempting the above manipulations. In this position, delivery can be carried out either by gentle downward traction, in which case the delivery of the posterior shoulder occurs first, or by intravaginal manipulations to follow [ 25 , 38 , 70 , 71 ].

This position is suitable when the patient is thin and not under epidural anesthesia. The same approach may not be suitable in the opposite scenario, such as when the patient has a Foley urinary catheter or is being monitored with a cardiotocogram. In such cases, intra-abdominal manipulations are typically preferred.

If all the previously described maneuvers fail, last-resort maneuvers are pursued, which must be approached with utmost caution before resorting to them, to mitigate maternal morbidity and mortality, particularly in the hands of inexperienced practitioners. One such manipulation is the intentional fracture of the fetus’s clavicle, aimed at reducing shoulder resistance [ 25 , 34 , 38 , 70 , 71 , 72 ].

The prognosis for shoulder dystocia cases has shown improvement following specialized seminars for maternity ward staff. Studies have indicated a decrease in the rate of neonatal trauma from 9.3% before these training seminars to 2.3% after their implementation. Some studies emphasize the importance of conducting such training sessions on an annual basis. Ultimately, it is recommended to establish a shoulder dystocia management protocol in every clinic to ensure the organized and timely treatment [ 25 , 34 , 38 , 70 , 71 , 72 ].

9. Conclusions

Shoulder dystocia is the nightmare of obstetricians. It is a complication of normal vaginal delivery, which, despite its low frequency, can have unpleasant consequences for both the mother and the newborn.

While there are risk factors that have been associated with the onset of dystocia, it remains extremely difficult to predict.

Several maneuvers have been described that can help deal with this dramatic situation. Various protocols and algorithms have been drawn up by groups of scientists in order to organize the actions of the obstetrics team in a shoulder dystocia emergency.

In such cases, crucial attributes include speed and determination. Therefore, the obstetric team tasked with managing such emergencies should be scientifically qualified and adequately trained, preferably through simulation scenarios.

At the same time, however, the necessity of the thorough theoretical and practical training of the new obstetrician in the delivery room should be emphasized, so that he is able to recognize in time the signs that indicate the appearance of dystocia, before it leads to obstetrical impasses and hasty actions, which “impose” risks for the mother and the fetus, for situations that should have been foreseen.

Seminars featuring simulated scenarios offer valuable training opportunities for obstetricians and midwives, enhancing their proficiency in handling immediate danger situations effectively.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Author Contributions

P.T.: Conceptualization, data curation; writing—original draft preparation; S.K.: conceptualization, methodology; K.N.: data curation; N.K.: original draft preparation; A.B.: original draft preparation; S.A.: data curation; T.N.: data curation; K.C.: original draft preparation; V.S.: data curation; P.P.: original draft preparation; G.I.: visualization, project administration, corrections; N.N.: visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Shoulder Dystocia: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Diagnosis, Prevention, Complications, Prognosis, and Management

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Dragana, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
• 2 Midwifery Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Alexandra, Vasilissis Sofias Ave. 80, 115 28 Athens, Greece.
• 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Hospital Helena Venizelou, Elenas Venizelou 2, 115 21 Athens, Greece.
• 4 Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos 28, 122 43 Egaleo, Greece.
• PMID: 38929807
• PMCID: PMC11204412
• DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060586

The term dystocia refers to labor characterized by a slow progression with delayed rates or even pauses in the dilation of the cervix or the descent of the fetus. Dystocia describes the deviation from the limits that define a normal birth and is often used as a synonym for the term pathological birth. Shoulder dystocia, also known as the manual exit of the shoulders during vaginal delivery on cephalic presentation, is defined as the "failure of the shoulders to spontaneously traverse the pelvis after delivery of the fetal head". This means that obstetric interventions are necessary to deliver the fetus's body after the head has been delivered, as gentle traction has failed. Abnormal labor (dystocia) is expressed and represented in partograms or by the prolongation of the latent phase or by slowing and pausing in the phases of cervical dilatation and fetal descent. While partograms are helpful in visualizing the progress of labor, regular use of them has not been shown to enhance obstetric outcomes considerably, and no partogram has been shown to be superior to others in comparative trials. Dystocia can, therefore, appear in any phase of the evolution of childbirth, so it is necessary to simultaneously assess all the factors that may contribute to its abnormal evolution, that is, the forces exerted, the weight, the shape, the presentation and position of the fetus, the integrity and morphology of the pelvis, and its relation to the fetus. When this complication occurs, it can result in an increased incidence of maternal morbidity, as well as an increased incidence of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Although several risk factors are associated with shoulder dystocia, it has proven impossible to recognize individual cases of shoulder dystocia in practice before they occur during labor. Various guidelines have been published for the management of shoulder dystocia, with the primary goal of educating the obstetrician and midwife on the importance of a preplanned sequence of maneuvers, thereby reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: complications; diagnosis; prevention; shoulder dystocia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

• [Shoulder dystocia: Guidelines for clinical practice--Short text]. Sentilhes L, Sénat MV, Boulogne AI, Deneux-Tharaux C, Fuchs F, Legendre G, Le Ray C, Lopez E, Schmitz T, Lejeune-Saada V. Sentilhes L, et al. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Dec;44(10):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.053. Epub 2015 Nov 2. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015. PMID: 26541561 Review. French.
• Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Sentilhes L, Sénat MV, Boulogne AI, Deneux-Tharaux C, Fuchs F, Legendre G, Le Ray C, Lopez E, Schmitz T, Lejeune-Saada V. Sentilhes L, et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.047. Epub 2016 May 30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27318182 Review.
• Shoulder Dystocia. Davis DD, Roshan A, Varacallo M. Davis DD, et al. 2023 Dec 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. 2023 Dec 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. PMID: 29261950 Free Books & Documents.
• [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation]. Rozenberg P. Rozenberg P. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Nov;45(9):1037-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Oct 19. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016. PMID: 27771202 Review. French.
• [Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors]. Schmitz T. Schmitz T. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Dec;44(10):1261-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.051. Epub 2015 Nov 1. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015. PMID: 26530180 Review. French.
• Gherman R.B., Chauhan S., Ouzounian J.G., Lerner H., Gonik B., Goodwin T.M. Shoulder dystocia: The unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006;195:657–672. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.007. - DOI - PubMed
• Gurewitsch Allen E. Prescriptive and proscriptive lessons for managing shoulder dystocia: A technical and videographical tutorial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2024;230:S1014–S1026. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
• Hill M.G., Cohen W.R. Shoulder dystocia: Prediction and management. Women’s Health. 2016;12:251–261. doi: 10.2217/whe.15.103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
• Athukorala C., Middleton P., Crowther C.A. Intrapartum interventions for preventing shoulder dystocia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2006;2006:CD005543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005543.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
• Heinonen K., Saisto T., Gissler M., Kaijomaa M., Sarvilinna N. Pitfalls in the diagnostics of shoulder dystocia: An analysis based on the scrutiny of 2274 deliveries. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2024;309:1401–1409. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07022-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

Related information

Grants and funding, linkout - more resources, full text sources.

• Europe PubMed Central
• PubMed Central

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

• The Open University
• Explore OpenLearn
• Get started
• Create a course
• Free courses
• Collections

My OpenLearn Create Profile

• Personalise your OpenLearn profile
• Save Your favourite content
• Get recognition for your learning

Already Registered?

• Antenatal Care Module: Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: Acknowledgements
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: Introduction
• Labour Delivery and Care Module: 1. Recognition of Normal Labour
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: 2. Assessing the Woman in Labour
• Labour Delivery and Care Module: 3. Care of the Woman in Labour
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: 4. Using the Partograph
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: 5. Conducting a Normal Delivery
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: 6. Active Management of the Third Stage of Labour
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: 7. Neonatal Resuscitation
• Introduction
• Learning Outcomes for Study Session 8
• 8.1.1  Vertex presentation
• 8.1.2  Malpresentations
• 8.1.3  Malposition
• 8.2  Causes and consequences of malpresentations and malpositions
• 8.3.1  Causes of breech presentation
• 8.3.2  Diagnosis of breech presentation
• 8.3.3  Types of breech presentation
• 8.3.4  Risks of breech presentation
• 8.4.1  Causes of face presentation
• 8.4.2  Diagnosis of face presentation
• 8.4.3  Complications of face presentation
• 8.5.1  Possible causes of brow presentation
• 8.5.2  Diagnosis of brow presentation

8.5.3  Complications of brow presentation

8.6.1  Causes of shoulder presentation

• 8.6.2  Diagnosis of shoulder presentation
• 8.6.3  Complications of shoulder presentation
• 8.7.1  Types of twin pregnancy
• 8.7.2  Diagnosis of twin pregnancy
• 8.7.3  Consequences of twin pregnancy
• 8.8  Management of women with malpresentation or multiple pregnancy
• Summary of Study Session 8
• Self-Assessment Questions (SAQs) for Study Session 8
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: 9. Obstructed Labour
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: 10. Ruptured Uterus
• Labour and Delivery Care Module: 11. Postpartum Haemorrhage
• Download PDF version
• Labour and Delivery Care PDF (4MB)

Download this course

Download this course for use offline or for other devices.

The materials below are provided for offline use for your convenience and are not tracked. If you wish to save your progress, please go through the online version.

About this course

• 26 hours study
• 1 Level 1: Introductory
• Course description

Labour and Delivery Care

If you create an account, you can set up a personal learning profile on the site.

8.6  Shoulder presentation

Shoulder presentation is rare at full term, but may occur when the fetus lies transversely across the uterus (Figure 8.7), if it stopped part-way through spontaneous inversion from breech to vertex, or it may lie transversely from early pregnancy. If the baby lies facing upwards, its back may be the presenting part; if facing downwards its hand may emerge through the cervix. A baby in the transverse position cannot be born through the vagina and the labour will be obstructed. Refer babies in shoulder presentation urgently.

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

If you have any concerns about anything on this site please get in contact with us here.

Report a concern

What is a Transverse Baby?

• Download PDF Copy

In the final weeks of pregnancy, babies often settle down in a head down position. However, in rare cases, the baby can be seen lying sideways or in a transverse position, known as malpresentation.

Although this is common in early pregnancy when the babies are more mobile, most babies turn into the head down position by the last trimester. When this does not happen, the malpresentation called transverse lie results.

According to studies, this presentation is rare and is found in only 1 in 400 cases.

Risk Factors for Transverse Lie

Women with the following conditions are at a high risk for transverse presentation:

• High ratio of amniotic fluid to fetus
• Uterine abnormality
• Placenta previa
• Fibroids in the uterus
• Factors preventing fetal head engagement in the mother’s pelvis
• Narrow or contracted pelvis
• More than 2 babies in the womb

Diagnosis of Transverse Presentation

Abdominal examination— In transverse position, the presenting part of the fetus is typically the shoulder. During abdominal examination, the head or the buttocks cannot be felt at the bottom of the uterus and the head is usually felt in the side.

Vaginal examination— A shoulder may be felt during a vaginal examination. An arm of the fetus may even slip forward and the hand or elbow may be felt during pelvic examination.

Confirmation - An ultrasound scan of the uterus confirms the transverse lie position.

Complications of Transverse Lie

Transverse presentation can cause serious complications during delivery. Some of the consequences are listed below:

• Obstructed labor
• Umbilical cord or hand prolapse
• Postpartum hemorrhage
• Birth trauma
• Rupture of the uterus

Delivering a Transverse Baby

It is almost impossible to deliver a transverse baby vaginally. So if a baby is still lying sideways at term or when labor begins, a C-section (caesarean) may be the safest option for delivering the baby.

If a transverse position is confirmed near term, the woman may be advised to be admitted to the hospital, as there is a minor risk of the umbilical cord slipping out of the uterus once water breaks.

Related Stories

• Long COVID's lasting toll: Economic losses, healthcare strain, and the urgent need for better global policies
• Pandemic stress leads to surge in ADHD diagnoses and medication use in Finland
• Research reveals impact of heatwaves on perinatal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa

This should be treated as a medical emergency and attended to immediately, as the cord may come out of the uterus before the baby and then the baby will need to be delivered quickly.

In some cases of transverse lie and shoulder presentation, the baby can be turned manually into the head down position using a process called external cephalic version.

In this process, a skilled medical professional applies pressure on the maternal belly and guides the head of the fetus into the correct position, all the while monitoring the fetal presentation on an ultrasound monitor. Although this procedure is largely painless, it can cause some discomfort to the mother.

This process should be tried only if there is no risk of membrane rupture. Although the fetus can be readily rotated to a head first presentation, it may easily turn back to the transverse position.

If external cephalic version is successful, the chance of a normal, vaginal birth is very high. If external cephalic version is not recommended due to some reason or if the procedure is unsuccessful, delivery needs to be performed via caesarean section.

If a woman goes into labor while the baby is in a transverse position, it can impact the shoulder of the fetus adversely. This is because, in such cases, the fetus in a folded position is under pressure to move down the birth canal.

An immediate C-section should be carried out in such cases, even if the fetus is not alive, as this can cause rupture of the uterus.

• https://www.nhs.uk/
• http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43972/1/9241545879_eng.pdf

Further Reading

• All Childbirth Content
• Visitor Policies for Cesarean Sections
• Breeched Birth: Caesarean Section or Vaginal Delivery?
• Natural Childbirth
• Anal Sphincter Injury During Childbirth

Last Updated: Dec 29, 2022

Susha Cheriyedath

Susha is a scientific communication professional holding a Master's degree in Biochemistry, with expertise in Microbiology, Physiology, Biotechnology, and Nutrition. After a two-year tenure as a lecturer from 2000 to 2002, where she mentored undergraduates studying Biochemistry, she transitioned into editorial roles within scientific publishing. She has accumulated nearly two decades of experience in medical communication, assuming diverse roles in research, writing, editing, and editorial management.

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

Cheriyedath, Susha. (2022, December 29). What is a Transverse Baby?. News-Medical. Retrieved on September 17, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-a-Transverse-Baby.aspx.

Cheriyedath, Susha. "What is a Transverse Baby?". News-Medical . 17 September 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-a-Transverse-Baby.aspx>.

Cheriyedath, Susha. "What is a Transverse Baby?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-a-Transverse-Baby.aspx. (accessed September 17, 2024).

Cheriyedath, Susha. 2022. What is a Transverse Baby? . News-Medical, viewed 17 September 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-a-Transverse-Baby.aspx.

Suggested Reading

Cancel reply to comment

• Trending Stories
• Latest Interviews
• Top Health Articles

How can microdialysis benefit drug development

Ilona Vuist

In this interview, discover how Charles River uses the power of microdialysis for drug development as well as CNS therapeutics.

Global and Local Efforts to Take Action Against Hepatitis

Lindsey Hiebert and James Amugsi

In this interview, we explore global and local efforts to combat viral hepatitis with Lindsey Hiebert, Deputy Director of the Coalition for Global Hepatitis Elimination (CGHE), and James Amugsi, a Mandela Washington Fellow and Physician Assistant at Sandema Hospital in Ghana. Together, they provide valuable insights into the challenges, successes, and the importance of partnerships in the fight against hepatitis.

Addressing Important Cardiac Biology Questions with Shotgun Top-Down Proteomics

In this interview conducted at Pittcon 2024, we spoke to Professor John Yates about capturing cardiomyocyte cell-to-cell heterogeneity via shotgun top-down proteomics.

Latest News

Newsletters you may be interested in

Your AI Powered Scientific Assistant

Hi, I'm Azthena, you can trust me to find commercial scientific answers from News-Medical.net.

A few things you need to know before we start. Please read and accept to continue.

• Use of “Azthena” is subject to the terms and conditions of use as set out by OpenAI .
• Content provided on any AZoNetwork sites are subject to the site Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
• Large Language Models can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.

Great. Ask your question.

Azthena may occasionally provide inaccurate responses. Read the full terms .

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions .

Provide Feedback