literature review advantages

Advantages and disadvantages of literature review

This comprehensive article explores some of the advantages and disadvantages of literature review in research. Reviewing relevant literature is a key area in research, and indeed, it is a research activity in itself. It helps researchers investigate a particular topic in detail. However, it has some limitations as well.

What is literature review?

In order to understand the advantages and disadvantages of literature review, it is important to understand what a literature review is and how it differs from other methods of research. According to Jones and Gratton (2009) a literature review essentially consists of critically reading, evaluating, and organising existing literature on a topic to assess the state of knowledge in the area. It is sometimes called critical review.

A literature review is a select analysis of existing research which is relevant to a researcher’s selected topic, showing how it relates to their investigation. It explains and justifies how their investigation may help answer some of the questions or gaps in the chosen area of study (University of Reading, 2022).

A literature review is a term used in the field of research to describe a systematic and methodical investigation of the relevant literature on a particular topic. In other words, it is an analysis of existing research on a topic in order to identify any relevant studies and draw conclusions about the topic.

A literature review is not the same as a bibliography or a database search. Rather than simply listing references to sources of information, a literature review involves critically evaluating and summarizing existing research on a topic. As such, it is a much more detailed and complex process than simply searching databases and websites, and it requires a lot of effort and skills.

Advantages of literature review

Information synthesis

A literature review is a very thorough and methodical exercise. It can be used to synthesize information and draw conclusions about a particular topic. Through a careful evaluation and critical summarization, researchers can draw a clear and comprehensive picture of the chosen topic.

Familiarity with the current knowledge

According to the University of Illinois (2022), literature reviews allow researchers to gain familiarity with the existing knowledge in their selected field, as well as the boundaries and limitations of that field.

Creation of new body of knowledge

One of the key advantages of literature review is that it creates new body of knowledge. Through careful evaluation and critical summarisation, researchers can create a new body of knowledge and enrich the field of study.

Answers to a range of questions

Literature reviews help researchers analyse the existing body of knowledge to determine the answers to a range of questions concerning a particular subject.

Disadvantages of literature review

Time consuming

As a literature review involves collecting and evaluating research and summarizing the findings, it requires a significant amount of time. To conduct a comprehensive review, researchers need to read many different articles and analyse a lot of data. This means that their review will take a long time to complete.

Lack of quality sources  

Researchers are expected to use a wide variety of sources of information to present a comprehensive review. However, it may sometimes be challenging for them to identify the quality sources because of the availability of huge numbers in their chosen field. It may also happen because of the lack of past empirical work, particularly if the selected topic is an unpopular one.

Descriptive writing

One of the major disadvantages of literature review is that instead of critical appreciation, some researchers end up developing reviews that are mostly descriptive. Their reviews are often more like summaries of the work of other writers and lack in criticality. It is worth noting that they must go beyond describing the literature.

Key features of literature review

Clear organisation

A literature review is typically a very critical and thorough process. Universities usually recommend students a particular structure to develop their reviews. Like all other academic writings, a review starts with an introduction and ends with a conclusion. Between the beginning and the end, researchers present the main body of the review containing the critical discussion of sources.

No obvious bias

A key feature of a literature review is that it should be very unbiased and objective. However, it should be mentioned that researchers may sometimes be influenced by their own opinions of the world.

Proper citation

One of the key features of literature review is that it must be properly cited. Researchers should include all the sources that they have used for information. They must do citations and provide a reference list by the end in line with a recognized referencing system such as Harvard.

To conclude this article, it can be said that a literature review is a type of research that seeks to examine and summarise existing research on a particular topic. It is an essential part of a dissertation/thesis. However, it is not an easy thing to handle by an inexperienced person. It also requires a lot of time and patience.

Hope you like this ‘Advantages and disadvantages of literature review’. Please share this with others to support our research work.

Other useful articles:

How to evaluate website content

Advantages and disadvantages of primary and secondary research

Advantages and disadvantages of simple random sampling

Last update: 08 May 2022

References:

Jones, I., & Gratton, C. (2009) Research Methods for Sports Shttps://www.howandwhat.net/new/evaluate-website-content/tudies, 2 nd edition, London: Routledge

University of Illinois (2022) Literature review, available at: https://www.uis.edu/learning-hub/writing-resources/handouts/learning-hub/literature-review (accessed 08 May 2022)

University of Reading (2022) Literature reviews, available at: https://libguides.reading.ac.uk/literaturereview/starting (accessed 07 May 2022)

Author: M Rahman

M Rahman writes extensively online and offline with an emphasis on business management, marketing, and tourism. He is a lecturer in Management and Marketing. He holds an MSc in Tourism & Hospitality from the University of Sunderland. Also, graduated from Leeds Metropolitan University with a BA in Business & Management Studies and completed a DTLLS (Diploma in Teaching in the Life-Long Learning Sector) from London South Bank University.

Related Posts

How to be a good team player, competitive advantage for tourist destinations, advantages and disadvantages of snowball sampling.

• UConn Library
• Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
• Introduction

Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction

• Getting Started
• How to Pick a Topic
• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings

What are Literature Reviews?

So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D.  The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.

Goals of Literature Reviews

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?  A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews .  Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.

What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?

• A research paper assigned in a course
• A thesis or dissertation
• A grant proposal
• An article intended for publication in a journal

All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.

Types of Literature Reviews

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.

• Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework:  10.1177/08948453211037398  

Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.

• Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review:  10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w

Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.

• Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis:  10.1215/00703370-9164737

Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts .  Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.

• Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis:  10.1177/05390184221113735

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

• UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
• Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview

Literature Review: Purpose of a Literature Review

• Literature Review
• Purpose of a Literature Review
• Work in Progress
• Compiling & Writing
• Books, Articles, & Web Pages
• Types of Literature Reviews
• Departmental Differences
• Citation Styles & Plagiarism
• Know the Difference! Systematic Review vs. Literature Review

The purpose of a literature review is to:

• Provide a foundation of knowledge on a topic
• Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication and give credit to other researchers
• Identify inconstancies: gaps in research, conflicts in previous studies, open questions left from other research
• Identify the need for additional research (justifying your research)
• Identify the relationship of works in the context of their contribution to the topic and other works
• Place your own research within the context of existing literature, making a case for why further study is needed.

Videos & Tutorials

VIDEO: What is the role of a literature review in research? What's it mean to "review" the literature? Get the big picture of what to expect as part of the process. This video is published under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-NC-SA US license. License, credits, and contact information can be found here: https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/tutorials/litreview/

Elements in a Literature Review

• Elements in a Literature Review txt of infographic
• << Previous: Literature Review
• Next: Searching >>
• Last Updated: Oct 19, 2023 12:07 PM
• URL: https://uscupstate.libguides.com/Literature_Review

Service update: Some parts of the Library’s website will be down for maintenance on August 11.

Secondary menu

• Log in to your Library account
• Hours and Maps
• Connect from Off Campus
• UC Berkeley Home

Search form

Conducting a literature review: why do a literature review, why do a literature review.

• How To Find "The Literature"
• Found it -- Now What?

Besides the obvious reason for students -- because it is assigned! -- a literature review helps you explore the research that has come before you, to see how your research question has (or has not) already been addressed.

You identify:

• core research in the field
• experts in the subject area
• methodology you may want to use (or avoid)
• gaps in knowledge -- or where your research would fit in

It Also Helps You:

• Publish and share your findings
• Justify requests for grants and other funding
• Identify best practices to inform practice
• Set wider context for a program evaluation
• Compile information to support community organizing

Great brief overview, from NCSU

Want To Know More?

• Next: How To Find "The Literature" >>
• Last Updated: Apr 25, 2024 1:10 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/litreview

Literature Review - what is a Literature Review, why it is important and how it is done

What are literature reviews, goals of literature reviews, types of literature reviews, about this guide/licence.

• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Literature Reviews and Sources
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings
• Useful Resources

Help is Just a Click Away

Search our FAQ Knowledge base, ask a question, chat, send comments...

Go to LibAnswers

 What is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries. " - Quote from Taylor, D. (n.d) "The literature review: A few tips on conducting it"

Source NC State University Libraries. This video is published under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-NC-SA US license.

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

- Baumeister, R.F. & Leary, M.R. (1997). "Writing narrative literature reviews," Review of General Psychology , 1(3), 311-320.

When do you need to write a Literature Review?

• When writing a prospectus or a thesis/dissertation
• When writing a research paper
• When writing a grant proposal

In all these cases you need to dedicate a chapter in these works to showcase what have been written about your research topic and to point out how your own research will shed a new light into these body of scholarship.

Literature reviews are also written as standalone articles as a way to survey a particular research topic in-depth. This type of literature reviews look at a topic from a historical perspective to see how the understanding of the topic have change through time.

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

• Narrative Review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.
• Book review essays/ Historiographical review essays : This is a type of review that focus on a small set of research books on a particular topic " to locate these books within current scholarship, critical methodologies, and approaches" in the field. - LARR
• Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L.K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
• Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M.C. & Ilardi, S.S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
• Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). "Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts," Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53(3), 311-318.

Guide adapted from "Literature Review" , a guide developed by Marisol Ramos used under CC BY 4.0 /modified from original.

• Next: Strategies to Find Sources >>
• Last Updated: Jul 3, 2024 10:56 AM
• URL: https://lit.libguides.com/Literature-Review

The Library, Technological University of the Shannon: Midwest

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved August 21, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

• Maps & Floorplans
• Libraries A-Z

• Ellis Library (main)
• Engineering Library
• Geological Sciences
• Journalism Library
• Law Library
• Mathematical Sciences
• MU Digital Collections
• Veterinary Medical
• More Libraries...
• Instructional Services
• Course Reserves
• Course Guides
• Schedule a Library Class
• Class Assessment Forms
• Recordings & Tutorials
• Research & Writing Help
• More class resources
• Places to Study
• Borrow, Request & Renew
• Call Numbers
• Computers, Printers, Scanners & Software
• Digital Media Lab
• Equipment Lending: Laptops, cameras, etc.
• Subject Librarians
• Writing Tutors
• More In the Library...
• Undergraduate Students
• Graduate Students
• Faculty & Staff
• Researcher Support
• Distance Learners
• International Students
• More Services for...
• View my MU Libraries Account (login & click on My Library Account)
• View my MOBIUS Checkouts
• Renew my Books (login & click on My Loans)
• Place a Hold on a Book
• Request Books from Depository
• View my ILL@MU Account
• Set Up Alerts in Databases
• More Account Information...

Introduction to Literature Reviews

Introduction.

• Step One: Define
• Step Two: Research
• Step Three: Write
• Suggested Readings

A literature review is a written work that :

• Compiles significant research published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers;
• —Surveys scholarly articles, books, dissertations, conference proceedings, and other sources;
• —Examines contrasting perspectives, theoretical approaches, methodologies, findings, results, conclusions.
• —Reviews critically, analyzes, and synthesizes existing research on a topic; and,
• Performs a thorough “re” view, “overview”, or “look again” of past and current works on a subject, issue, or theory.

From these analyses, the writer then offers an overview of the current status of a particular area of knowledge from both a practical and theoretical perspective.

Literature reviews are important because they are usually a  required  step in a thesis proposal (Master's or PhD). The proposal will not be well-supported without a literature review. Also, literature reviews are important because they help you learn important authors and ideas in your field. This is useful for your coursework and your writing. Knowing key authors also helps you become acquainted with other researchers in your field.

Look at this diagram and imagine that your research is the "something new." This shows how your research should relate to major works and other sources.

Olivia Whitfield | Graduate Reference Assistant | 2012-2015

• Next: Step One: Define >>
• Last Updated: Jul 9, 2024 9:53 AM
• URL: https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/literaturereview

A Guide to Literature Reviews

Importance of a good literature review.

• Conducting the Literature Review
• Structure and Writing Style
• Types of Literature Reviews
• Citation Management Software This link opens in a new window
• Acknowledgements

A literature review is not only a summary of key sources, but  has an organizational pattern which combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories . A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical features of a literature review might:

• Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations,
• Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates,
• Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
• Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched to date.

The purpose of a literature review is to:

• Place each work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied.
• Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
• Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.
• Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies.
• Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort.
• Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research.
• Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important].
• << Previous: Definition
• Next: Conducting the Literature Review >>
• Last Updated: Jul 3, 2024 3:13 PM
• URL: https://libguides.mcmaster.ca/litreview

Libraries | Research Guides

Literature reviews, what is a literature review, learning more about how to do a literature review.

• Planning the Review
• The Research Question
• Choosing Where to Search
• Organizing the Review
• Writing the Review

A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it relates to your research question. A literature review goes beyond a description or summary of the literature you have read. 

• Sage Research Methods Core This link opens in a new window SAGE Research Methods supports research at all levels by providing material to guide users through every step of the research process. SAGE Research Methods is the ultimate methods library with more than 1000 books, reference works, journal articles, and instructional videos by world-leading academics from across the social sciences, including the largest collection of qualitative methods books available online from any scholarly publisher. – Publisher

• Next: Planning the Review >>
• Last Updated: Jul 8, 2024 11:22 AM
• URL: https://libguides.northwestern.edu/literaturereviews

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Clinics (Sao Paulo)

Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Review Checklist

Debora f.b. leite.

I Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, BR

II Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, PE, BR

III Hospital das Clinicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, PE, BR

Maria Auxiliadora Soares Padilha

Jose g. cecatti.

A sophisticated literature review (LR) can result in a robust dissertation/thesis by scrutinizing the main problem examined by the academic study; anticipating research hypotheses, methods and results; and maintaining the interest of the audience in how the dissertation/thesis will provide solutions for the current gaps in a particular field. Unfortunately, little guidance is available on elaborating LRs, and writing an LR chapter is not a linear process. An LR translates students’ abilities in information literacy, the language domain, and critical writing. Students in postgraduate programs should be systematically trained in these skills. Therefore, this paper discusses the purposes of LRs in dissertations and theses. Second, the paper considers five steps for developing a review: defining the main topic, searching the literature, analyzing the results, writing the review and reflecting on the writing. Ultimately, this study proposes a twelve-item LR checklist. By clearly stating the desired achievements, this checklist allows Masters and Ph.D. students to continuously assess their own progress in elaborating an LR. Institutions aiming to strengthen students’ necessary skills in critical academic writing should also use this tool.

INTRODUCTION

Writing the literature review (LR) is often viewed as a difficult task that can be a point of writer’s block and procrastination ( 1 ) in postgraduate life. Disagreements on the definitions or classifications of LRs ( 2 ) may confuse students about their purpose and scope, as well as how to perform an LR. Interestingly, at many universities, the LR is still an important element in any academic work, despite the more recent trend of producing scientific articles rather than classical theses.

The LR is not an isolated section of the thesis/dissertation or a copy of the background section of a research proposal. It identifies the state-of-the-art knowledge in a particular field, clarifies information that is already known, elucidates implications of the problem being analyzed, links theory and practice ( 3 - 5 ), highlights gaps in the current literature, and places the dissertation/thesis within the research agenda of that field. Additionally, by writing the LR, postgraduate students will comprehend the structure of the subject and elaborate on their cognitive connections ( 3 ) while analyzing and synthesizing data with increasing maturity.

At the same time, the LR transforms the student and hints at the contents of other chapters for the reader. First, the LR explains the research question; second, it supports the hypothesis, objectives, and methods of the research project; and finally, it facilitates a description of the student’s interpretation of the results and his/her conclusions. For scholars, the LR is an introductory chapter ( 6 ). If it is well written, it demonstrates the student’s understanding of and maturity in a particular topic. A sound and sophisticated LR can indicate a robust dissertation/thesis.

A consensus on the best method to elaborate a dissertation/thesis has not been achieved. The LR can be a distinct chapter or included in different sections; it can be part of the introduction chapter, part of each research topic, or part of each published paper ( 7 ). However, scholars view the LR as an integral part of the main body of an academic work because it is intrinsically connected to other sections ( Figure 1 ) and is frequently present. The structure of the LR depends on the conventions of a particular discipline, the rules of the department, and the student’s and supervisor’s areas of expertise, needs and interests.

Interestingly, many postgraduate students choose to submit their LR to peer-reviewed journals. As LRs are critical evaluations of current knowledge, they are indeed publishable material, even in the form of narrative or systematic reviews. However, systematic reviews have specific patterns 1 ( 8 ) that may not entirely fit with the questions posed in the dissertation/thesis. Additionally, the scope of a systematic review may be too narrow, and the strict criteria for study inclusion may omit important information from the dissertation/thesis. Therefore, this essay discusses the definition of an LR is and methods to develop an LR in the context of an academic dissertation/thesis. Finally, we suggest a checklist to evaluate an LR.

WHAT IS A LITERATURE REVIEW IN A THESIS?

Conducting research and writing a dissertation/thesis translates rational thinking and enthusiasm ( 9 ). While a strong body of literature that instructs students on research methodology, data analysis and writing scientific papers exists, little guidance on performing LRs is available. The LR is a unique opportunity to assess and contrast various arguments and theories, not just summarize them. The research results should not be discussed within the LR, but the postgraduate student tends to write a comprehensive LR while reflecting on his or her own findings ( 10 ).

Many people believe that writing an LR is a lonely and linear process. Supervisors or the institutions assume that the Ph.D. student has mastered the relevant techniques and vocabulary associated with his/her subject and conducts a self-reflection about previously published findings. Indeed, while elaborating the LR, the student should aggregate diverse skills, which mainly rely on his/her own commitment to mastering them. Thus, less supervision should be required ( 11 ). However, the parameters described above might not currently be the case for many students ( 11 , 12 ), and the lack of formal and systematic training on writing LRs is an important concern ( 11 ).

An institutional environment devoted to active learning will provide students the opportunity to continuously reflect on LRs, which will form a dialogue between the postgraduate student and the current literature in a particular field ( 13 ). Postgraduate students will be interpreting studies by other researchers, and, according to Hart (1998) ( 3 ), the outcomes of the LR in a dissertation/thesis include the following:

• To identify what research has been performed and what topics require further investigation in a particular field of knowledge;
• To determine the context of the problem;
• To recognize the main methodologies and techniques that have been used in the past;
• To place the current research project within the historical, methodological and theoretical context of a particular field;
• To identify significant aspects of the topic;
• To elucidate the implications of the topic;
• To offer an alternative perspective;
• To discern how the studied subject is structured;
• To improve the student’s subject vocabulary in a particular field; and
• To characterize the links between theory and practice.

A sound LR translates the postgraduate student’s expertise in academic and scientific writing: it expresses his/her level of comfort with synthesizing ideas ( 11 ). The LR reveals how well the postgraduate student has proceeded in three domains: an effective literature search, the language domain, and critical writing.

Effective literature search

All students should be trained in gathering appropriate data for specific purposes, and information literacy skills are a cornerstone. These skills are defined as “an individual’s ability to know when they need information, to identify information that can help them address the issue or problem at hand, and to locate, evaluate, and use that information effectively” ( 14 ). Librarian support is of vital importance in coaching the appropriate use of Boolean logic (AND, OR, NOT) and other tools for highly efficient literature searches (e.g., quotation marks and truncation), as is the appropriate management of electronic databases.

Language domain

Academic writing must be concise and precise: unnecessary words distract the reader from the essential content ( 15 ). In this context, reading about issues distant from the research topic ( 16 ) may increase students’ general vocabulary and familiarity with grammar. Ultimately, reading diverse materials facilitates and encourages the writing process itself.

Critical writing

Critical judgment includes critical reading, thinking and writing. It supposes a student’s analytical reflection about what he/she has read. The student should delineate the basic elements of the topic, characterize the most relevant claims, identify relationships, and finally contrast those relationships ( 17 ). Each scientific document highlights the perspective of the author, and students will become more confident in judging the supporting evidence and underlying premises of a study and constructing their own counterargument as they read more articles. A paucity of integration or contradictory perspectives indicates lower levels of cognitive complexity ( 12 ).

Thus, while elaborating an LR, the postgraduate student should achieve the highest category of Bloom’s cognitive skills: evaluation ( 12 ). The writer should not only summarize data and understand each topic but also be able to make judgments based on objective criteria, compare resources and findings, identify discrepancies due to methodology, and construct his/her own argument ( 12 ). As a result, the student will be sufficiently confident to show his/her own voice .

Writing a consistent LR is an intense and complex activity that reveals the training and long-lasting academic skills of a writer. It is not a lonely or linear process. However, students are unlikely to be prepared to write an LR if they have not mastered the aforementioned domains ( 10 ). An institutional environment that supports student learning is crucial.

Different institutions employ distinct methods to promote students’ learning processes. First, many universities propose modules to develop behind the scenes activities that enhance self-reflection about general skills (e.g., the skills we have mastered and the skills we need to develop further), behaviors that should be incorporated (e.g., self-criticism about one’s own thoughts), and each student’s role in the advancement of his/her field. Lectures or workshops about LRs themselves are useful because they describe the purposes of the LR and how it fits into the whole picture of a student’s work. These activities may explain what type of discussion an LR must involve, the importance of defining the correct scope, the reasons to include a particular resource, and the main role of critical reading.

Some pedagogic services that promote a continuous improvement in study and academic skills are equally important. Examples include workshops about time management, the accomplishment of personal objectives, active learning, and foreign languages for nonnative speakers. Additionally, opportunities to converse with other students promotes an awareness of others’ experiences and difficulties. Ultimately, the supervisor’s role in providing feedback and setting deadlines is crucial in developing students’ abilities and in strengthening students’ writing quality ( 12 ).

HOW SHOULD A LITERATURE REVIEW BE DEVELOPED?

A consensus on the appropriate method for elaborating an LR is not available, but four main steps are generally accepted: defining the main topic, searching the literature, analyzing the results, and writing ( 6 ). We suggest a fifth step: reflecting on the information that has been written in previous publications ( Figure 2 ).

First step: Defining the main topic

Planning an LR is directly linked to the research main question of the thesis and occurs in parallel to students’ training in the three domains discussed above. The planning stage helps organize ideas, delimit the scope of the LR ( 11 ), and avoid the wasting of time in the process. Planning includes the following steps:

• Reflecting on the scope of the LR: postgraduate students will have assumptions about what material must be addressed and what information is not essential to an LR ( 13 , 18 ). Cooper’s Taxonomy of Literature Reviews 2 systematizes the writing process through six characteristics and nonmutually exclusive categories. The focus refers to the reviewer’s most important points of interest, while the goals concern what students want to achieve with the LR. The perspective assumes answers to the student’s own view of the LR and how he/she presents a particular issue. The coverage defines how comprehensive the student is in presenting the literature, and the organization determines the sequence of arguments. The audience is defined as the group for whom the LR is written.
• Designating sections and subsections: Headings and subheadings should be specific, explanatory and have a coherent sequence throughout the text ( 4 ). They simulate an inverted pyramid, with an increasing level of reflection and depth of argument.
• Identifying keywords: The relevant keywords for each LR section should be listed to guide the literature search. This list should mirror what Hart (1998) ( 3 ) advocates as subject vocabulary . The keywords will also be useful when the student is writing the LR since they guide the reader through the text.
• Delineating the time interval and language of documents to be retrieved in the second step. The most recently published documents should be considered, but relevant texts published before a predefined cutoff year can be included if they are classic documents in that field. Extra care should be employed when translating documents.

Second step: Searching the literature

The ability to gather adequate information from the literature must be addressed in postgraduate programs. Librarian support is important, particularly for accessing difficult texts. This step comprises the following components:

• Searching the literature itself: This process consists of defining which databases (electronic or dissertation/thesis repositories), official documents, and books will be searched and then actively conducting the search. Information literacy skills have a central role in this stage. While searching electronic databases, controlled vocabulary (e.g., Medical Subject Headings, or MeSH, for the PubMed database) or specific standardized syntax rules may need to be applied.

In addition, two other approaches are suggested. First, a review of the reference list of each document might be useful for identifying relevant publications to be included and important opinions to be assessed. This step is also relevant for referencing the original studies and leading authors in that field. Moreover, students can directly contact the experts on a particular topic to consult with them regarding their experience or use them as a source of additional unpublished documents.

Before submitting a dissertation/thesis, the electronic search strategy should be repeated. This process will ensure that the most recently published papers will be considered in the LR.

• Selecting documents for inclusion: Generally, the most recent literature will be included in the form of published peer-reviewed papers. Assess books and unpublished material, such as conference abstracts, academic texts and government reports, are also important to assess since the gray literature also offers valuable information. However, since these materials are not peer-reviewed, we recommend that they are carefully added to the LR.

This task is an important exercise in time management. First, students should read the title and abstract to understand whether that document suits their purposes, addresses the research question, and helps develop the topic of interest. Then, they should scan the full text, determine how it is structured, group it with similar documents, and verify whether other arguments might be considered ( 5 ).

Third step: Analyzing the results

Critical reading and thinking skills are important in this step. This step consists of the following components:

• Reading documents: The student may read various texts in depth according to LR sections and subsections ( defining the main topic ), which is not a passive activity ( 1 ). Some questions should be asked to practice critical analysis skills, as listed below. Is the research question evident and articulated with previous knowledge? What are the authors’ research goals and theoretical orientations, and how do they interact? Are the authors’ claims related to other scholars’ research? Do the authors consider different perspectives? Was the research project designed and conducted properly? Are the results and discussion plausible, and are they consistent with the research objectives and methodology? What are the strengths and limitations of this work? How do the authors support their findings? How does this work contribute to the current research topic? ( 1 , 19 )
• Taking notes: Students who systematically take notes on each document are more readily able to establish similarities or differences with other documents and to highlight personal observations. This approach reinforces the student’s ideas about the next step and helps develop his/her own academic voice ( 1 , 13 ). Voice recognition software ( 16 ), mind maps ( 5 ), flowcharts, tables, spreadsheets, personal comments on the referenced texts, and note-taking apps are all available tools for managing these observations, and the student him/herself should use the tool that best improves his/her learning. Additionally, when a student is considering submitting an LR to a peer-reviewed journal, notes should be taken on the activities performed in all five steps to ensure that they are able to be replicated.

Fourth step: Writing

The recognition of when a student is able and ready to write after a sufficient period of reading and thinking is likely a difficult task. Some students can produce a review in a single long work session. However, as discussed above, writing is not a linear process, and students do not need to write LRs according to a specific sequence of sections. Writing an LR is a time-consuming task, and some scholars believe that a period of at least six months is sufficient ( 6 ). An LR, and academic writing in general, expresses the writer’s proper thoughts, conclusions about others’ work ( 6 , 10 , 13 , 16 ), and decisions about methods to progress in the chosen field of knowledge. Thus, each student is expected to present a different learning and writing trajectory.

In this step, writing methods should be considered; then, editing, citing and correct referencing should complete this stage, at least temporarily. Freewriting techniques may be a good starting point for brainstorming ideas and improving the understanding of the information that has been read ( 1 ). Students should consider the following parameters when creating an agenda for writing the LR: two-hour writing blocks (at minimum), with prespecified tasks that are possible to complete in one section; short (minutes) and long breaks (days or weeks) to allow sufficient time for mental rest and reflection; and short- and long-term goals to motivate the writing itself ( 20 ). With increasing experience, this scheme can vary widely, and it is not a straightforward rule. Importantly, each discipline has a different way of writing ( 1 ), and each department has its own preferred styles for citations and references.

Fifth step: Reflecting on the writing

In this step, the postgraduate student should ask him/herself the same questions as in the analyzing the results step, which can take more time than anticipated. Ambiguities, repeated ideas, and a lack of coherence may not be noted when the student is immersed in the writing task for long periods. The whole effort will likely be a work in progress, and continuous refinements in the written material will occur once the writing process has begun.

LITERATURE REVIEW CHECKLIST

In contrast to review papers, the LR of a dissertation/thesis should not be a standalone piece or work. Instead, it should present the student as a scholar and should maintain the interest of the audience in how that dissertation/thesis will provide solutions for the current gaps in a particular field.

A checklist for evaluating an LR is convenient for students’ continuous academic development and research transparency: it clearly states the desired achievements for the LR of a dissertation/thesis. Here, we present an LR checklist developed from an LR scoring rubric ( 11 ). For a critical analysis of an LR, we maintain the five categories but offer twelve criteria that are not scaled ( Figure 3 ). The criteria all have the same importance and are not mutually exclusive.

First category: Coverage

1. justified criteria exist for the inclusion and exclusion of literature in the review.

This criterion builds on the main topic and areas covered by the LR ( 18 ). While experts may be confident in retrieving and selecting literature, postgraduate students must convince their audience about the adequacy of their search strategy and their reasons for intentionally selecting what material to cover ( 11 ). References from different fields of knowledge provide distinct perspective, but narrowing the scope of coverage may be important in areas with a large body of existing knowledge.

Second category: Synthesis

2. a critical examination of the state of the field exists.

A critical examination is an assessment of distinct aspects in the field ( 1 ) along with a constructive argument. It is not a negative critique but an expression of the student’s understanding of how other scholars have added to the topic ( 1 ), and the student should analyze and contextualize contradictory statements. A writer’s personal bias (beliefs or political involvement) have been shown to influence the structure and writing of a document; therefore, the cultural and paradigmatic background guide how the theories are revised and presented ( 13 ). However, an honest judgment is important when considering different perspectives.

3. The topic or problem is clearly placed in the context of the broader scholarly literature

The broader scholarly literature should be related to the chosen main topic for the LR ( how to develop the literature review section). The LR can cover the literature from one or more disciplines, depending on its scope, but it should always offer a new perspective. In addition, students should be careful in citing and referencing previous publications. As a rule, original studies and primary references should generally be included. Systematic and narrative reviews present summarized data, and it may be important to cite them, particularly for issues that should be understood but do not require a detailed description. Similarly, quotations highlight the exact statement from another publication. However, excessive referencing may disclose lower levels of analysis and synthesis by the student.

4. The LR is critically placed in the historical context of the field

Situating the LR in its historical context shows the level of comfort of the student in addressing a particular topic. Instead of only presenting statements and theories in a temporal approach, which occasionally follows a linear timeline, the LR should authentically characterize the student’s academic work in the state-of-art techniques in their particular field of knowledge. Thus, the LR should reinforce why the dissertation/thesis represents original work in the chosen research field.

5. Ambiguities in definitions are considered and resolved

Distinct theories on the same topic may exist in different disciplines, and one discipline may consider multiple concepts to explain one topic. These misunderstandings should be addressed and contemplated. The LR should not synthesize all theories or concepts at the same time. Although this approach might demonstrate in-depth reading on a particular topic, it can reveal a student’s inability to comprehend and synthesize his/her research problem.

6. Important variables and phenomena relevant to the topic are articulated

The LR is a unique opportunity to articulate ideas and arguments and to purpose new relationships between them ( 10 , 11 ). More importantly, a sound LR will outline to the audience how these important variables and phenomena will be addressed in the current academic work. Indeed, the LR should build a bidirectional link with the remaining sections and ground the connections between all of the sections ( Figure 1 ).

7. A synthesized new perspective on the literature has been established

The LR is a ‘creative inquiry’ ( 13 ) in which the student elaborates his/her own discourse, builds on previous knowledge in the field, and describes his/her own perspective while interpreting others’ work ( 13 , 17 ). Thus, students should articulate the current knowledge, not accept the results at face value ( 11 , 13 , 17 ), and improve their own cognitive abilities ( 12 ).

Third category: Methodology

8. the main methodologies and research techniques that have been used in the field are identified and their advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

The LR is expected to distinguish the research that has been completed from investigations that remain to be performed, address the benefits and limitations of the main methods applied to date, and consider the strategies for addressing the expected limitations described above. While placing his/her research within the methodological context of a particular topic, the LR will justify the methodology of the study and substantiate the student’s interpretations.

9. Ideas and theories in the field are related to research methodologies

The audience expects the writer to analyze and synthesize methodological approaches in the field. The findings should be explained according to the strengths and limitations of previous research methods, and students must avoid interpretations that are not supported by the analyzed literature. This criterion translates to the student’s comprehension of the applicability and types of answers provided by different research methodologies, even those using a quantitative or qualitative research approach.

Fourth category: Significance

10. the scholarly significance of the research problem is rationalized.

The LR is an introductory section of a dissertation/thesis and will present the postgraduate student as a scholar in a particular field ( 11 ). Therefore, the LR should discuss how the research problem is currently addressed in the discipline being investigated or in different disciplines, depending on the scope of the LR. The LR explains the academic paradigms in the topic of interest ( 13 ) and methods to advance the field from these starting points. However, an excess number of personal citations—whether referencing the student’s research or studies by his/her research team—may reflect a narrow literature search and a lack of comprehensive synthesis of ideas and arguments.

11. The practical significance of the research problem is rationalized

The practical significance indicates a student’s comprehensive understanding of research terminology (e.g., risk versus associated factor), methodology (e.g., efficacy versus effectiveness) and plausible interpretations in the context of the field. Notably, the academic argument about a topic may not always reflect the debate in real life terms. For example, using a quantitative approach in epidemiology, statistically significant differences between groups do not explain all of the factors involved in a particular problem ( 21 ). Therefore, excessive faith in p -values may reflect lower levels of critical evaluation of the context and implications of a research problem by the student.

Fifth category: Rhetoric

12. the lr was written with a coherent, clear structure that supported the review.

This category strictly relates to the language domain: the text should be coherent and presented in a logical sequence, regardless of which organizational ( 18 ) approach is chosen. The beginning of each section/subsection should state what themes will be addressed, paragraphs should be carefully linked to each other ( 10 ), and the first sentence of each paragraph should generally summarize the content. Additionally, the student’s statements are clear, sound, and linked to other scholars’ works, and precise and concise language that follows standardized writing conventions (e.g., in terms of active/passive voice and verb tenses) is used. Attention to grammar, such as orthography and punctuation, indicates prudence and supports a robust dissertation/thesis. Ultimately, all of these strategies provide fluency and consistency for the text.

Although the scoring rubric was initially proposed for postgraduate programs in education research, we are convinced that this checklist is a valuable tool for all academic areas. It enables the monitoring of students’ learning curves and a concentrated effort on any criteria that are not yet achieved. For institutions, the checklist is a guide to support supervisors’ feedback, improve students’ writing skills, and highlight the learning goals of each program. These criteria do not form a linear sequence, but ideally, all twelve achievements should be perceived in the LR.

CONCLUSIONS

A single correct method to classify, evaluate and guide the elaboration of an LR has not been established. In this essay, we have suggested directions for planning, structuring and critically evaluating an LR. The planning of the scope of an LR and approaches to complete it is a valuable effort, and the five steps represent a rational starting point. An institutional environment devoted to active learning will support students in continuously reflecting on LRs, which will form a dialogue between the writer and the current literature in a particular field ( 13 ).

The completion of an LR is a challenging and necessary process for understanding one’s own field of expertise. Knowledge is always transitory, but our responsibility as scholars is to provide a critical contribution to our field, allowing others to think through our work. Good researchers are grounded in sophisticated LRs, which reveal a writer’s training and long-lasting academic skills. We recommend using the LR checklist as a tool for strengthening the skills necessary for critical academic writing.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Leite DFB has initially conceived the idea and has written the first draft of this review. Padilha MAS and Cecatti JG have supervised data interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read the draft and agreed with this submission. Authors are responsible for all aspects of this academic piece.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to all of the professors of the ‘Getting Started with Graduate Research and Generic Skills’ module at University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, for suggesting and supporting this article. Funding: DFBL has granted scholarship from Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES) to take part of her Ph.D. studies in Ireland (process number 88881.134512/2016-01). There is no participation from sponsors on authors’ decision to write or to submit this manuscript.

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

1 The questions posed in systematic reviews usually follow the ‘PICOS’ acronym: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study design.

2 In 1988, Cooper proposed a taxonomy that aims to facilitate students’ and institutions’ understanding of literature reviews. Six characteristics with specific categories are briefly described: Focus: research outcomes, research methodologies, theories, or practices and applications; Goals: integration (generalization, conflict resolution, and linguistic bridge-building), criticism, or identification of central issues; Perspective: neutral representation or espousal of a position; Coverage: exhaustive, exhaustive with selective citations, representative, central or pivotal; Organization: historical, conceptual, or methodological; and Audience: specialized scholars, general scholars, practitioners or policymakers, or the general public.

• University of Texas Libraries

Literature Reviews

• What is a literature review?
• Steps in the Literature Review Process
• Define your research question
• Determine inclusion and exclusion criteria
• Choose databases and search
• Review Results
• Synthesize Results
• Analyze Results
• Librarian Support
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools

What is a Literature Review?

A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research question. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important past and current research and practices. It provides background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field. 

A literature review should: 

• Provide a comprehensive and updated review of the literature;
• Explain why this review has taken place;
• Articulate a position or hypothesis;
• Acknowledge and account for conflicting and corroborating points of view

From  S age Research Methods

Purpose of a Literature Review

A literature review can be written as an introduction to a study to:

• Demonstrate how a study fills a gap in research
• Compare a study with other research that's been done

Or it can be a separate work (a research article on its own) which:

• Organizes or describes a topic
• Describes variables within a particular issue/problem

Limitations of a Literature Review

Some of the limitations of a literature review are:

• It's a snapshot in time. Unlike other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an end. There may be future developments that could make your work less relevant.
• It may be too focused. Some niche studies may miss the bigger picture.
• It can be difficult to be comprehensive. There is no way to make sure all the literature on a topic was considered.
• It is easy to be biased if you stick to top tier journals. There may be other places where people are publishing exemplary research. Look to open access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. Also, make sure to include opposing views (and not just supporting evidence).

Source: Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information & Libraries Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, June 2009, pp. 91–108. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.

Librarian Assistance

For help, please contact the librarian for your subject area.  We have a guide to library specialists by subject .

• Last Updated: Aug 22, 2024 9:12 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/literaturereviews

University Libraries

Literature review.

• What is a Literature Review?
• What is Its Purpose?
• 1. Select a Topic
• 2. Set the Topic in Context
• 3. Types of Information Sources
• 4. Use Information Sources
• 5. Get the Information
• 6. Organize / Manage the Information
• 7. Position the Literature Review
• 8. Write the Literature Review

A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, and other sources relevant to a particular area of research.  The review should enumerate, describe, summarize, objectively evaluate and clarify this previous research.  It should give a theoretical base for the research and help you (the author) determine the nature of your research.  The literature review acknowledges the work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well conceived.  It is assumed that by mentioning a previous work in the field of study, that the author has read, evaluated, and assimiliated that work into the work at hand.

A literature review creates a "landscape" for the reader, giving her or him a full understanding of the developments in the field.  This landscape informs the reader that the author has indeed assimilated all (or the vast majority of) previous, significant works in the field into her or his research. 

 "In writing the literature review, the purpose is to convey to the reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. The literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (eg. your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries.( http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/literature-review )

Recommended Reading

• Next: What is Its Purpose? >>
• Last Updated: Oct 2, 2023 12:34 PM

• Privacy Policy

Home » Literature Review – Types Writing Guide and Examples

Literature Review – Types Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

Literature Review

Definition:

A literature review is a comprehensive and critical analysis of the existing literature on a particular topic or research question. It involves identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing relevant literature, including scholarly articles, books, and other sources, to provide a summary and critical assessment of what is known about the topic.

Types of Literature Review

Types of Literature Review are as follows:

• Narrative literature review : This type of review involves a comprehensive summary and critical analysis of the available literature on a particular topic or research question. It is often used as an introductory section of a research paper.
• Systematic literature review: This is a rigorous and structured review that follows a pre-defined protocol to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific research question. It is often used in evidence-based practice and systematic reviews.
• Meta-analysis: This is a quantitative review that uses statistical methods to combine data from multiple studies to derive a summary effect size. It provides a more precise estimate of the overall effect than any individual study.
• Scoping review: This is a preliminary review that aims to map the existing literature on a broad topic area to identify research gaps and areas for further investigation.
• Critical literature review : This type of review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature on a particular topic or research question. It aims to provide a critical analysis of the literature and identify areas where further research is needed.
• Conceptual literature review: This review synthesizes and integrates theories and concepts from multiple sources to provide a new perspective on a particular topic. It aims to provide a theoretical framework for understanding a particular research question.
• Rapid literature review: This is a quick review that provides a snapshot of the current state of knowledge on a specific research question or topic. It is often used when time and resources are limited.
• Thematic literature review : This review identifies and analyzes common themes and patterns across a body of literature on a particular topic. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature and identify key themes and concepts.
• Realist literature review: This review is often used in social science research and aims to identify how and why certain interventions work in certain contexts. It takes into account the context and complexities of real-world situations.
• State-of-the-art literature review : This type of review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge in a particular field, highlighting the most recent and relevant research. It is often used in fields where knowledge is rapidly evolving, such as technology or medicine.
• Integrative literature review: This type of review synthesizes and integrates findings from multiple studies on a particular topic to identify patterns, themes, and gaps in the literature. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic.
• Umbrella literature review : This review is used to provide a broad overview of a large and diverse body of literature on a particular topic. It aims to identify common themes and patterns across different areas of research.
• Historical literature review: This type of review examines the historical development of research on a particular topic or research question. It aims to provide a historical context for understanding the current state of knowledge on a particular topic.
• Problem-oriented literature review : This review focuses on a specific problem or issue and examines the literature to identify potential solutions or interventions. It aims to provide practical recommendations for addressing a particular problem or issue.
• Mixed-methods literature review : This type of review combines quantitative and qualitative methods to synthesize and analyze the available literature on a particular topic. It aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research question by combining different types of evidence.

Parts of Literature Review

Parts of a literature review are as follows:

Introduction

The introduction of a literature review typically provides background information on the research topic and why it is important. It outlines the objectives of the review, the research question or hypothesis, and the scope of the review.

Literature Search

This section outlines the search strategy and databases used to identify relevant literature. The search terms used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and any limitations of the search are described.

Literature Analysis

The literature analysis is the main body of the literature review. This section summarizes and synthesizes the literature that is relevant to the research question or hypothesis. The review should be organized thematically, chronologically, or by methodology, depending on the research objectives.

Critical Evaluation

Critical evaluation involves assessing the quality and validity of the literature. This includes evaluating the reliability and validity of the studies reviewed, the methodology used, and the strength of the evidence.

The conclusion of the literature review should summarize the main findings, identify any gaps in the literature, and suggest areas for future research. It should also reiterate the importance of the research question or hypothesis and the contribution of the literature review to the overall research project.

The references list includes all the sources cited in the literature review, and follows a specific referencing style (e.g., APA, MLA, Harvard).

How to write Literature Review

Here are some steps to follow when writing a literature review:

• Define your research question or topic : Before starting your literature review, it is essential to define your research question or topic. This will help you identify relevant literature and determine the scope of your review.
• Conduct a comprehensive search: Use databases and search engines to find relevant literature. Look for peer-reviewed articles, books, and other academic sources that are relevant to your research question or topic.
• Evaluate the sources: Once you have found potential sources, evaluate them critically to determine their relevance, credibility, and quality. Look for recent publications, reputable authors, and reliable sources of data and evidence.
• Organize your sources: Group the sources by theme, method, or research question. This will help you identify similarities and differences among the literature, and provide a structure for your literature review.
• Analyze and synthesize the literature : Analyze each source in depth, identifying the key findings, methodologies, and conclusions. Then, synthesize the information from the sources, identifying patterns and themes in the literature.
• Write the literature review : Start with an introduction that provides an overview of the topic and the purpose of the literature review. Then, organize the literature according to your chosen structure, and analyze and synthesize the sources. Finally, provide a conclusion that summarizes the key findings of the literature review, identifies gaps in knowledge, and suggests areas for future research.
• Edit and proofread: Once you have written your literature review, edit and proofread it carefully to ensure that it is well-organized, clear, and concise.

Examples of Literature Review

Here’s an example of how a literature review can be conducted for a thesis on the topic of “ The Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’ Mental Health”:

• Start by identifying the key terms related to your research topic. In this case, the key terms are “social media,” “teenagers,” and “mental health.”
• Use academic databases like Google Scholar, JSTOR, or PubMed to search for relevant articles, books, and other publications. Use these keywords in your search to narrow down your results.
• Evaluate the sources you find to determine if they are relevant to your research question. You may want to consider the publication date, author’s credentials, and the journal or book publisher.
• Begin reading and taking notes on each source, paying attention to key findings, methodologies used, and any gaps in the research.
• Organize your findings into themes or categories. For example, you might categorize your sources into those that examine the impact of social media on self-esteem, those that explore the effects of cyberbullying, and those that investigate the relationship between social media use and depression.
• Synthesize your findings by summarizing the key themes and highlighting any gaps or inconsistencies in the research. Identify areas where further research is needed.
• Use your literature review to inform your research questions and hypotheses for your thesis.

For example, after conducting a literature review on the impact of social media on teenagers’ mental health, a thesis might look like this:

“Using a mixed-methods approach, this study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes in teenagers. Specifically, the study will examine the effects of cyberbullying, social comparison, and excessive social media use on self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. Through an analysis of survey data and qualitative interviews with teenagers, the study will provide insight into the complex relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes, and identify strategies for promoting positive mental health outcomes in young people.”

Reference: Smith, J., Jones, M., & Lee, S. (2019). The effects of social media use on adolescent mental health: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(2), 154-165. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.03.024

Reference Example: Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Journal, volume number(issue number), page range. doi:0000000/000000000000 or URL

Applications of Literature Review

some applications of literature review in different fields:

• Social Sciences: In social sciences, literature reviews are used to identify gaps in existing research, to develop research questions, and to provide a theoretical framework for research. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and political science.
• Natural Sciences: In natural sciences, literature reviews are used to summarize and evaluate the current state of knowledge in a particular field or subfield. Literature reviews can help researchers identify areas where more research is needed and provide insights into the latest developments in a particular field. Fields such as biology, chemistry, and physics commonly use literature reviews.
• Health Sciences: In health sciences, literature reviews are used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, identify best practices, and determine areas where more research is needed. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as medicine, nursing, and public health.
• Humanities: In humanities, literature reviews are used to identify gaps in existing knowledge, develop new interpretations of texts or cultural artifacts, and provide a theoretical framework for research. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as history, literary studies, and philosophy.

Role of Literature Review in Research

Here are some applications of literature review in research:

• Identifying Research Gaps : Literature review helps researchers identify gaps in existing research and literature related to their research question. This allows them to develop new research questions and hypotheses to fill those gaps.
• Developing Theoretical Framework: Literature review helps researchers develop a theoretical framework for their research. By analyzing and synthesizing existing literature, researchers can identify the key concepts, theories, and models that are relevant to their research.
• Selecting Research Methods : Literature review helps researchers select appropriate research methods and techniques based on previous research. It also helps researchers to identify potential biases or limitations of certain methods and techniques.
• Data Collection and Analysis: Literature review helps researchers in data collection and analysis by providing a foundation for the development of data collection instruments and methods. It also helps researchers to identify relevant data sources and identify potential data analysis techniques.
• Communicating Results: Literature review helps researchers to communicate their results effectively by providing a context for their research. It also helps to justify the significance of their findings in relation to existing research and literature.

Purpose of Literature Review

Some of the specific purposes of a literature review are as follows:

• To provide context: A literature review helps to provide context for your research by situating it within the broader body of literature on the topic.
• To identify gaps and inconsistencies: A literature review helps to identify areas where further research is needed or where there are inconsistencies in the existing literature.
• To synthesize information: A literature review helps to synthesize the information from multiple sources and present a coherent and comprehensive picture of the current state of knowledge on the topic.
• To identify key concepts and theories : A literature review helps to identify key concepts and theories that are relevant to your research question and provide a theoretical framework for your study.
• To inform research design: A literature review can inform the design of your research study by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions.

Characteristics of Literature Review

Some Characteristics of Literature Review are as follows:

• Identifying gaps in knowledge: A literature review helps to identify gaps in the existing knowledge and research on a specific topic or research question. By analyzing and synthesizing the literature, you can identify areas where further research is needed and where new insights can be gained.
• Establishing the significance of your research: A literature review helps to establish the significance of your own research by placing it in the context of existing research. By demonstrating the relevance of your research to the existing literature, you can establish its importance and value.
• Informing research design and methodology : A literature review helps to inform research design and methodology by identifying the most appropriate research methods, techniques, and instruments. By reviewing the literature, you can identify the strengths and limitations of different research methods and techniques, and select the most appropriate ones for your own research.
• Supporting arguments and claims: A literature review provides evidence to support arguments and claims made in academic writing. By citing and analyzing the literature, you can provide a solid foundation for your own arguments and claims.
• I dentifying potential collaborators and mentors: A literature review can help identify potential collaborators and mentors by identifying researchers and practitioners who are working on related topics or using similar methods. By building relationships with these individuals, you can gain valuable insights and support for your own research and practice.
• Keeping up-to-date with the latest research : A literature review helps to keep you up-to-date with the latest research on a specific topic or research question. By regularly reviewing the literature, you can stay informed about the latest findings and developments in your field.

Advantages of Literature Review

There are several advantages to conducting a literature review as part of a research project, including:

• Establishing the significance of the research : A literature review helps to establish the significance of the research by demonstrating the gap or problem in the existing literature that the study aims to address.
• Identifying key concepts and theories: A literature review can help to identify key concepts and theories that are relevant to the research question, and provide a theoretical framework for the study.
• Supporting the research methodology : A literature review can inform the research methodology by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions.
• Providing a comprehensive overview of the literature : A literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on a topic, allowing the researcher to identify key themes, debates, and areas of agreement or disagreement.
• Identifying potential research questions: A literature review can help to identify potential research questions and areas for further investigation.
• Avoiding duplication of research: A literature review can help to avoid duplication of research by identifying what has already been done on a topic, and what remains to be done.
• Enhancing the credibility of the research : A literature review helps to enhance the credibility of the research by demonstrating the researcher’s knowledge of the existing literature and their ability to situate their research within a broader context.

Limitations of Literature Review

Limitations of Literature Review are as follows:

• Limited scope : Literature reviews can only cover the existing literature on a particular topic, which may be limited in scope or depth.
• Publication bias : Literature reviews may be influenced by publication bias, which occurs when researchers are more likely to publish positive results than negative ones. This can lead to an incomplete or biased picture of the literature.
• Quality of sources : The quality of the literature reviewed can vary widely, and not all sources may be reliable or valid.
• Time-limited: Literature reviews can become quickly outdated as new research is published, making it difficult to keep up with the latest developments in a field.
• Subjective interpretation : Literature reviews can be subjective, and the interpretation of the findings can vary depending on the researcher’s perspective or bias.
• Lack of original data : Literature reviews do not generate new data, but rather rely on the analysis of existing studies.
• Risk of plagiarism: It is important to ensure that literature reviews do not inadvertently contain plagiarism, which can occur when researchers use the work of others without proper attribution.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Research Contribution – Thesis Guide

Research Paper Conclusion – Writing Guide and...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Problem Statement – Writing Guide, Examples and...

Research Recommendations – Examples and Writing...

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Methods

• Getting Started
• Literature Review Research
• Research Design
• Research Design By Discipline
• SAGE Research Methods
• Teaching with SAGE Research Methods

Literature Review

• What is a Literature Review?
• What is NOT a Literature Review?
• Purposes of a Literature Review
• Types of Literature Reviews
• Literature Reviews vs. Systematic Reviews
• Systematic vs. Meta-Analysis

Literature Review  is a comprehensive survey of the works published in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in the form of an in-depth, critical bibliographic essay or annotated list in which attention is drawn to the most significant works.

Also, we can define a literature review as the collected body of scholarly works related to a topic:

• Summarizes and analyzes previous research relevant to a topic
• Includes scholarly books and articles published in academic journals
• Can be an specific scholarly paper or a section in a research paper

The objective of a Literature Review is to find previous published scholarly works relevant to an specific topic

• Help gather ideas or information
• Keep up to date in current trends and findings
• Help develop new questions

A literature review is important because it:

• Explains the background of research on a topic.
• Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
• Helps focus your own research questions or problems
• Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
• Suggests unexplored ideas or populations
• Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
• Tests assumptions; may help counter preconceived ideas and remove unconscious bias.
• Identifies critical gaps, points of disagreement, or potentially flawed methodology or theoretical approaches.
• Indicates potential directions for future research.

All content in this section is from Literature Review Research from Old Dominion University 

Keep in mind the following, a literature review is NOT:

Not an essay 

Not an annotated bibliography  in which you summarize each article that you have reviewed.  A literature review goes beyond basic summarizing to focus on the critical analysis of the reviewed works and their relationship to your research question.

Not a research paper   where you select resources to support one side of an issue versus another.  A lit review should explain and consider all sides of an argument in order to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted.

A literature review serves several purposes. For example, it

• provides thorough knowledge of previous studies; introduces seminal works.
• helps focus one’s own research topic.
• identifies a conceptual framework for one’s own research questions or problems; indicates potential directions for future research.
• suggests previously unused or underused methodologies, designs, quantitative and qualitative strategies.
• identifies gaps in previous studies; identifies flawed methodologies and/or theoretical approaches; avoids replication of mistakes.
• helps the researcher avoid repetition of earlier research.
• suggests unexplored populations.
• determines whether past studies agree or disagree; identifies controversy in the literature.
• tests assumptions; may help counter preconceived ideas and remove unconscious bias.

As Kennedy (2007) notes*, it is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the original studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally that become part of the lore of field. In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews.

Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are several approaches to how they can be done, depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study. Listed below are definitions of types of literature reviews:

Argumentative Review      This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews.

Integrative Review      Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication.

Historical Review      Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical reviews are focused on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.

Methodological Review      A review does not always focus on what someone said [content], but how they said it [method of analysis]. This approach provides a framework of understanding at different levels (i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches and data collection and analysis techniques), enables researchers to draw on a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection and data analysis, and helps highlight many ethical issues which we should be aware of and consider as we go through our study.

Systematic Review      This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?"

Theoretical Review      The purpose of this form is to concretely examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review help establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.

* Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature."  Educational Researcher  36 (April 2007): 139-147.

All content in this section is from The Literature Review created by Dr. Robert Larabee USC

Robinson, P. and Lowe, J. (2015),  Literature reviews vs systematic reviews.  Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39: 103-103. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12393

What's in the name? The difference between a Systematic Review and a Literature Review, and why it matters . By Lynn Kysh from University of Southern California

Systematic review or meta-analysis?

A  systematic review  answers a defined research question by collecting and summarizing all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria.

A  meta-analysis  is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of these studies.

Systematic reviews, just like other research articles, can be of varying quality. They are a significant piece of work (the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination at York estimates that a team will take 9-24 months), and to be useful to other researchers and practitioners they should have:

• clearly stated objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies
• explicit, reproducible methodology
• a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies
• assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies (e.g. risk of bias)
• systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics and findings of the included studies

Not all systematic reviews contain meta-analysis. 

Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of independent studies. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effects of health care than those derived from the individual studies included within a review.  More information on meta-analyses can be found in  Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 9 .

A meta-analysis goes beyond critique and integration and conducts secondary statistical analysis on the outcomes of similar studies.  It is a systematic review that uses quantitative methods to synthesize and summarize the results.

An advantage of a meta-analysis is the ability to be completely objective in evaluating research findings.  Not all topics, however, have sufficient research evidence to allow a meta-analysis to be conducted.  In that case, an integrative review is an appropriate strategy. 

Some of the content in this section is from Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: step by step guide created by Kate McAllister.

• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: Research Design >>
• Last Updated: Jul 15, 2024 10:34 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.udel.edu/researchmethods

Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library

• Collections
• Research Help

YSN Doctoral Programs: Steps in Conducting a Literature Review

• Biomedical Databases
• Global (Public Health) Databases
• Soc. Sci., History, and Law Databases
• Grey Literature
• Trials Registers
• Data and Statistics
• Public Policy
• Google Tips
• Recommended Books
• Steps in Conducting a Literature Review

What is a literature review?

A literature review is an integrated analysis -- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question.  That is, it represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the evidence and your research question.

A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment.  Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you.

Why is it important?

A literature review is important because it:

• Explains the background of research on a topic.
• Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
• Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
• Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
• Identifies critical gaps and points of disagreement.
• Discusses further research questions that logically come out of the previous studies.

APA7 Style resources

APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers

1. Choose a topic. Define your research question.

Your literature review should be guided by your central research question.  The literature represents background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way.

• Make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow.  Is it manageable?
• Begin writing down terms that are related to your question. These will be useful for searches later.
• If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your professor and your class mates.

2. Decide on the scope of your review

How many studies do you need to look at? How comprehensive should it be? How many years should it cover? 

• This may depend on your assignment.  How many sources does the assignment require?

3. Select the databases you will use to conduct your searches.

Make a list of the databases you will search. 

Where to find databases:

• use the tabs on this guide
• Find other databases in the Nursing Information Resources web page
• More on the Medical Library web page
• ... and more on the Yale University Library web page

4. Conduct your searches to find the evidence. Keep track of your searches.

• Use the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. Use the database tutorials for help.
• Save the searches in the databases. This saves time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. It is also helpful to use as a guide is the searches are not finding any useful results.
• Review the abstracts of research studies carefully. This will save you time.
• Use the bibliographies and references of research studies you find to locate others.
• Check with your professor, or a subject expert in the field, if you are missing any key works in the field.
• Ask your librarian for help at any time.
• Use a citation manager, such as EndNote as the repository for your citations. See the EndNote tutorials for help.

Review the literature

Some questions to help you analyze the research:

• What was the research question of the study you are reviewing? What were the authors trying to discover?
• Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings?
• What were the research methodologies? Analyze its literature review, the samples and variables used, the results, and the conclusions.
• Does the research seem to be complete? Could it have been conducted more soundly? What further questions does it raise?
• If there are conflicting studies, why do you think that is?
• How are the authors viewed in the field? Has this study been cited? If so, how has it been analyzed?

Tips: 

• Review the abstracts carefully.  
• Keep careful notes so that you may track your thought processes during the research process.
• Create a matrix of the studies for easy analysis, and synthesis, across all of the studies.
• << Previous: Recommended Books
• Last Updated: Jun 20, 2024 9:08 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.yale.edu/YSNDoctoral

Conducting a Literature Review

What is a literature review.

• Types of Literature Reviews
• Tutorials This link opens in a new window
• Research Iteration
• Guides & Handbooks

The literature of a literature review is not made up of novels and short stories and poetry—but is the collection of writing and research that has been produced on a particular topic.

The purpose of the literature review is to give you an overview of a particular topic. Your job is to discover the research that has been done, the major perspectives, and the significant thinkers and writers (experts) who have published on the topic you’re interested in. In other words, it’s a survey of what has been written and argued about your topic.

By the time you complete your literature review you should have written an essay that demonstrates that you:

• Understand the history of what’s been written and researched on your topic.
• Know the significance of the current academic thinking on your topic, including what the controversies are.
• Have a perspective about what work remains to be done on your topic.

Thus, a literature review synthesizes your research into an explanation of what is known and what is not known on your topic. If the topic is one from which you want to embark on a major research project, doing a literature review will save you time and help you figure out where you might focus your attention so you don’t duplicate research that has already been done.

Just to be clear: a literature review differs from a research paper in that a  literature review  is a summary and synthesis of the major arguments and thinking of experts on the topic you’re investigating, whereas a  research paper  supports a position or an opinion you have developed yourself as a result of your own analysis of a topic.

Another advantage of doing a literature review is that it summarizes the intellectual discussion that has been going on over the decades—or centuries—on a specific topic and allows you to join in that conversation (what academics call academic discourse) from a knowledgeable position.

The following presentation will provide you with the basic steps to follow as you work to complete a literature review.

" Literature Reviews " by  Excelsior Online Writing Lab  is licensed under  CC BY 4.0 International

• Next: Types of Literature Reviews >>
• Last Updated: Mar 4, 2024 10:44 AM
• URL: https://library.ric.edu/conducting-a-literature-review

600 Mt. Pleasant Ave

Providence, RI 02908

Social Media Links

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License unless otherwise noted.

©2024 Rhode Island College. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Home of Mass Communication Project Topics in Nigeria

No.1 Mass Communication Research Topics and Materials

BENEFITS OF LITERATURE REVIEW TO RESEARCH

Introduction.

Literature review offers lots of benefits to researcher. However, for the purpose of this post I will like to be direct. Below are few benefits of Literature review to researchers:

• A thorough exploration of the literature review will help to articulate our own research problems, objectives, as well as formulating our research questions or hypothesis.
• It helps to know the existing GAPS
• It helps to notices the important concepts and variables and how they were operationalized
• It widens the researcher knowledge of the problem
• It gives researchers detailed knowledge of the method and design that he can adopt or use new ones.
• It helps the researcher to arrive at picking a suitable scope
• It suggested theories previously used

Related Project Topics:

Project topics on #endbadgovernance protest in nigeria.

(Last Updated On: ) Explore comprehensive project topics on #EndBadGovernance protest, covering key areas such as media ownership effects, citizen journalism, press freedom, framing, media

INFLUENCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON PRACTICE OF PUBLIC RELATIONS IN NIGERIA

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: This study explores the influence of Artificial Intelligence on the practice of public relations in Nigeria, employing a cross-sectional survey

PERCEIVED EFFECTS OF AI ON JOURNALISM ETHICS PRACTICE IN NIGERIA

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: This study explores the perceived effects of Ai on journalism ethics in Nigeria, employing a cross-sectional survey research method. The

INFLUENCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN JOURNALISM INDUSTRY IN NIGERIA

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: This study investigates the transformative influence of Artificial Intelligence in journalism industry in Nigeria. Employing a quantitative research method, the

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNET AS A TOOL FOR RESEARCH AND ASSIGNMENT AMONG STUDENTS

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: This study investigates the effectiveness of the Internet as a tool for research and assignments among students. Guided by the

UTILIZATION OF INTERNET AS RESEARCH TOOL AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: The study was to investigate the utilization of internet as research tool among undergraduate students. The study was anchored on

Impact of ChatGPT on Writing Skills among Nigerian University Students

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: This study examines the impact of ChatGPT on writing skills among University students, framed within the context of the Technological

IMPACT OF PROSTATE CANCER AWARENESS CAMPAIGNS ON THE KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND PRACTICES (KAP) AMONG MALE LECTURERS

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: Prostate cancer, a leading cause of cancer mortality among men, is significantly prevalent in Nigeria. Despite its high incidence, awareness

USE OF NEW MEDIA AS A BUSINESS TOOL AMONG UNDERGRADUATES IN NIGERIA

(Last Updated On: ) ABSTRACT: This study examined the use of new media as a business tool among undergraduates in Nigeria. This research project specifically

PERCEPTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON THE 2023 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: The core objective of the study is to examine the perception of social media on the 2023 presidential election with a

ASSESSMENT OF IMPLICATION OF OPEN DEFECATION ON HEALTH OF PEOPLE IN RURAL AREAS

(Last Updated On: ) Abstract: The core objective of the study is assesses implications of open defecation on health of people living in rural areas:

Influence of Social Media on Social Capital

(Last Updated On: ) ABSTRACT: The study is on the thrust to examined the influence of social media on  social capital. This study was anchored

Call : 08033061386,  Whatsapp : 07033401559,  Email : [email protected] 

Address: No. 2, His Grace Shopping Complex, Ramat Junction, Ayeekale, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria.

A review on advancements in feature selection and feature extraction for high-dimensional NGS data analysis

• Published: 19 August 2024
• Volume 24 , article number  139 , ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• Kasmika Borah 1 ,
• Himanish Shekhar Das 1 ,
• Soumita Seth 2 ,
• Koushik Mallick 3 ,
• Zubair Rahaman 4 &
• Saurav Mallik 5 , 6  

94 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Recent advancements in biomedical technologies and the proliferation of high-dimensional Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) datasets have led to significant growth in the bulk and density of data. The NGS high-dimensional data, characterized by a large number of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metagenomics features relative to the number of biological samples, presents significant challenges for reducing feature dimensionality. The high dimensionality of NGS data poses significant challenges for data analysis, including increased computational burden, potential overfitting, and difficulty in interpreting results. Feature selection and feature extraction are two pivotal techniques employed to address these challenges by reducing the dimensionality of the data, thereby enhancing model performance, interpretability, and computational efficiency. Feature selection and feature extraction can be categorized into statistical and machine learning methods. The present study conducts a comprehensive and comparative review of various statistical, machine learning, and deep learning-based feature selection and extraction techniques specifically tailored for NGS and microarray data interpretation of humankind. A thorough literature search was performed to gather information on these techniques, focusing on array-based and NGS data analysis. Various techniques, including deep learning architectures, machine learning algorithms, and statistical methods, have been explored for microarray, bulk RNA-Seq, and single-cell, single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) technology-based datasets surveyed here. The study provides an overview of these techniques, highlighting their applications, advantages, and limitations in the context of high-dimensional NGS data. This review provides better insights for readers to apply feature selection and feature extraction techniques to enhance the performance of predictive models, uncover underlying biological patterns, and gain deeper insights into massive and complex NGS and microarray data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Evaluation of deep learning-based feature selection for single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis

SCDF: A Novel Single-Cell Classification Method Based on Dimension-Reduced Data Fusion

Feature Selection in Single-Cell RNA-seq Data via a Genetic Algorithm

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abdulsalam SO, Mohammed AA, Ajao JF, Babatunde RS, Ogundokun RO, Nnodim CT, Arowolo MO. Performance evaluation of ANOVA and RFE algorithms for classifying microarray dataset using SVM. InInformation Systems: 17th European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference, EMCIS 2020, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, November 25–26, 2020, Proceedings 17 2020 (pp. 480–492). Springer International Publishing

Aduviri R, Matos D, Villanueva E (2019) Feature selection algorithm recommendation for gene expression data through gradient boosting and neural network metamodels. Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2018:2726–2728

Aevermann B, Zhang Y, Novotny M, Keshk M, Bakken T (2021) A machine learning method for the discovery of minimum marker gene combinations for cell type identification from single-cell RNA sequencing. Genome Res 31:1767–1780

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Afrash MR, Mirbagheri E, Mashoufi M, Kazemi-Arpanahi H (2023) Optimizing prognostic factors of five-year survival in gastric cancer patients using feature selection techniques with machine learning algorithms: a comparative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 23:54

Almazrua H, Alshamlan H (2022) A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Hybrid Feature Selection Methods in Cancer Microarray Gene Expression Data. IEEE Access 10:71427–71449

Article   Google Scholar  

Almugren N, Alshamlan H (2019) A survey on hybrid feature selection methods in microarray gene expression data for cancer classification. IEEE Access 7:78533–78548

Alok AK, Saha S, Ekbal A (2017) Semi-supervised clustering for gene-expression data in multiobjective optimization framework. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8:421–439

Alomari OA, Khader AT, Al-Betar MA, Alyasseri ZA (2018) A hybrid filter-wrapper gene selection method for cancer classification. In2018 2nd international conference on biosignal analysis, processing and systems (ICBAPS). 113–118

Alshamlan HM, Badr GH, Alohali YA (2015a) Genetic Bee Colony (GBC) algorithm: A new gene selection method for microarray cancer classification. Comput Biol Chem 56:49–60

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Alshamlan H, Badr G, Alohali Y (2015) mRMR-ABC : A Hybrid Gene Selection Algorithm for Cancer Classification Using Microarray Gene Expression Profiling. 2015

Alzubi R, Ramzan N, Alzoubi H, Amira A (2017) A Hybrid Feature Selection Method for Complex Diseases SNPs. IEEE Access 6:1292–1301. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2778268

Amid E, Warmuth MK. TriMap: Large-scale Dimensionality Reduction Using Triplets., 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.00204

Amid E, Warmuth MK (2019) TriMap: Large-scale dimensionality reduction using triplets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00204

Anaissi A, Kennedy PJ, Goyal M, Catchpoole DR (2013) A balanced iterative random forest for gene selection from microarray data. BMC bioinformatics.14:1–0

Anders S, Huber W (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11:R106

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Andrews TS, Hemberg M (2019) M3Drop: dropout-based feature selection for scRNASeq. Bioinformatics 35:2865–2867

Ang JC, Mirzal A, Haron H, Hamed HNA (2016) Supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised feature selection: A review on gene selection. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 13:971–989

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

M Ascensión A, Ibáñez-Solé O, Inza I, Izeta A, Araúzo-Bravo MJ (2022) Triku: a feature selection method based on nearest neighbors for single-cell data. GigaScience. 11: 017

Baldi P, Long AD (2001) A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: Regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics 17:509–519

Bandyopadhyay S, Bhadra T, Mitra P, Maulik U (2014I) ntegration of dense subgraph finding with feature clustering for unsupervised feature selection. Pattern Recognit Lett 40:104–112

Bandyopadhyay S, Mallik S. (2014) A Survey and Comparative Study of Statistical Tests for Identifying Differential Expression from Microarray Data. 11:95-115

Barshan E, Ghodsi A, Azimifar Z, Jahromi MZ (2011) Supervised principal component analysis: Visualization, classification and regression on subspaces and submanifolds. Pattern Recogn 44:1357–1371

Battiti R (1994) Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:537–550

Bhadra T, Bandyopadhyay S (2014) Unsupervised Feature Selection using an Improved version of Differential Evolution. Expert Syst Appl 2:4042–4053

Google Scholar  

Bhadra T, Maulik U (2022) Unsupervised Feature Selection Using Iterative Shrinking and Expansion Algorithm. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell 6:1453–1462

Bhadra T, Mallik S, Hasan N, Zhao Z (2022) Comparison of five supervised feature selection algorithms leading to top features and gene signatures from multi-omics data in cancer. BMC Bioinformatics 23:153

Bommert A, Welchowski T, Schmid M, Rahnenführer J. (2022) Benchmark of filter methods for feature selection in high-dimensional gene expression survival data. Brief Bioinform. 23:1–13. bbab354

Bommert A, Welchowski T, Schmid M, Rahnenführer J (2022) Benchmark of filter methods for feature selection in high-dimensional gene expression survival data, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23,bbab354

Brazma A, Vilo J (2001) Gene expression data analysis. Microbes Infect 3:823–829

Cai JJ (2020) scGEAToolbox: a Matlab toolbox for single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis.1948–1949

Cao M, Chen G, Yu J, Shi S (2020) Computational prediction and analysis of species-specific fungi phosphorylation via feature optimization strategy. Brief Bioinform 21:595–608

Chakraborty D, Maulik U, Member S (2014) Identifying Cancer Biomarkers From Microarray Data Using Feature Selection and Semisupervised Learning. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 1–11

Chandrasekhar T, Thangavel K, Elayaraja E, Sathishkumar EN (2013) Unsupervised gene expression data using enhanced clustering method. In2013 IEEE International Conference ON Emerging Trends in Computing, Communication and Nanotechnology (ICECCN). 518–522

Chen Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Cheng Y, Wei Y (2022) Deep autoencoder for interpretable tissue-adaptive deconvolution and cell-type-specific gene analysis. Nat Commun 13:6735

Danaee P, Ghaeini R, Hendrix DA. (2017) A deep learning approach for cancer detection and relevant gene identification. InPacific symposium on biocomputing 2017: 219–229

Dashtban M, Balafar M (2017) Gene selection for microarray cancer classification using a new evolutionary method employing artificial intelligence concepts. Genomics 109:91–107

Degenhardt F, Seifert S, Szymczak S (2019) Evaluation of variable selection methods for random forests and omics data sets. Brief Bioinform 20:492–503

Deng T, Chen S, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Feng D, Wu H, Sun X (2023) A cofunctional grouping-based approach for non-redundant feature gene selection in unannotated single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Briefings in Bioinformatics.24:bbad042

Dittman D, Khoshgoftaar T, Wald R, Napolitano A (2012) Similarity analysis of feature ranking techniques on imbalanced dna microarray datasets. In2012 IEEE International conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine 1–5

Djellali H, Guessoum S, Ghoualmi-Zine N, Layachi S (2017) Fast correlation based filter combined with genetic algorithm and particle swarm on feature selection. In: 2017 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering - Boumerdes, ICEE-B. 2017:1–6

Dorrity MW, Saunders LM, Queitsch C, Fields S, Trapnell C (2020) Dimensionality reduction by UMAP to visualize physical and genetic interactions. Nat Commun. 11

Feng J, Zhang J, Zhu X (2023a) Gene selection and clustering of single-cell data based on Fisher score and genetic algorithm. J Supercomput 79:7067–7093

Feng J, Zhang J, Zhu X, Wang JH (2023b) Gene selection and clustering of single-cell data based on Fisher score and genetic algorithm. J Supercomput 79:7067–7093

Ferreira AJ, Figueiredo MA (2012) Efficient feature selection filters for high-dimensional data. Pattern Recogn Lett 33:1794–1804

Gangeh MJ, Zarkoob H, Ghodsi A (2017) Fast and Scalable Feature Selection for Gene Expression Data Using Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 14(1):167–181

Gisbrecht A, Schulz A, Hammer B (2015) Parametric nonlinear dimensionality reduction using kernel t-SNE. Neurocomputing 147:71–82

Gokhale M, Mohanty SK, Ojha A (2022) A stacked autoencoder based gene selection and cancer classification framework. Biomed Signal Process Control 78:103999

Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S (2020) Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM 63:139–144

GOSSET WS. Gosset, William Sealy. (2016) Encyclopedia of Mathematics

Gregory W, Sarwar N, Kevrekidis G, Villar S, Dumitrascu B (2024) MarkerMap: nonlinear marker selection for single-cell studies. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 10:17

Guo X, Jiang X, Xu J, Quan X, Wu M, Zhang H (2018) Ensemble consensus-guided unsupervised feature selection to identify huntington’s disease-associated genes. Genes (Basel).9

Gupta M, Gupta B (2021) A novel gene expression test method of minimizing breast cancer risk in reduced cost and time by improving SVM-RFE gene selection method combined with LASSO. J Integr Bioinform 18:139–153

Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 46:389–422

Ha, Van-Sang and Nguyen, Ha-Nam (2016) C-KPCA: custom kernel PCA for cancer classification.International conference on machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition.459–467

Hambali MA, Oladele TO, Adewole KS. (2020) Microarray cancer feature selection: Review, challenges and research directions. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering. 78–97

He X, Cai D, Niyogi P (2005) Laplacian Score for feature selection. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 507–514

Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. science. 313:504–7

Hira ZM, Gillies DF (2015) A review of feature selection and feature extraction methods applied on microarray data. Adv Bioinformatics. p198363

Hira ZM, Gillies DF (2015b) A review of feature selection and feature extraction methods applied on microarray data. Adv Bioinform 2015:198363

Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9:1735–1780

Holland JH (1992) Genetic algorithms. Sci Am. 267:66-73

Huang ML, Hung YH, Lee WM, Li RK, Jiang BR (2014) SVM-RFE based feature selection and taguchi parameters optimization for multiclass SVM Classifier. Sci World J 2014:795624

Huang H, Liu C, Wagle MM, Yang P (2023) Evaluation of deep learning-based feature selection for single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis. Genome Biol 24:259

Huang H, Wang Y, Rudin C, Browne EP (2022) Towards a comprehensive evaluation of dimension reduction methods for transcriptomic data visualization. Commun Biol. 5

Ismail AM, Remli MA, Choon YW (2023) Artificial Bee Colony algorithm in estimating kinetic parameters for yeast fermentation pathway. J Integr Bioinform 20:20220051

Jansi Rani M, Devaraj D (2019) Two-Stage Hybrid Gene Selection Using Mutual Information and Genetic Algorithm for Cancer Data Classification. J Med Syst. 43

Jia S, Lysenko A, Boroevich KA, Sharma A, Tsunoda T (2023) scDeepInsight: a supervised cell-type identification method for scRNA-seq data with deep learning. Briefings in Bioinformatics.24:bbad266

Jiang X, Chen M, Wang W, Song W, Lin GN (2019) Label Propagation Based Semi-supervised Feature Selection to Decode Clinical Phenotype of Huntington’s Disease. International Conference on Intelligent Computing 529–542

Jiang X, Chen M, Song W, Lin GN (2021) Label propagation-based semi-supervised feature selection on decoding clinical phenotypes with RNA-Seq data. BMC Med Genomics. 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-00985-0

Jović A, Brkić K, Bogunović N (2015) A review of feature selection methods with applications. In2015 38th International Convention on information and communication technology, electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). 1200–1205)

Kalousis A, Prados J, Hilario M (2007) Stability of feature selection algorithms: A study on high-dimensional spaces. Knowl Inf Syst 12:95–116

Kanzi AM, San JE, Chimukangara B (2020) Next Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis of Family Genetic Inheritance. Front Genet 11:1–18

Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report-tr06, Erciyes university, engineering faculty. Comput Eng Dep 200:1–10

Kavitha R, Neeradha K, Athira, Vyshna K, Sajith S. (2020) Laplacian Score and Top Scoring Pair Feature Selection Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication, ICCMC 2020. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.:214–219

Khalifa NEM, Taha MHN, Ezzat Ali D, Slowik A, Hassanien AE (2020) Artificial intelligence technique for gene expression by tumor RNA-Seq Data: A novel optimized deep learning approach. IEEE Access 8:22874

Khourdifi Y, Bahaj M (2018) Feature selection with fast correlation-based filter for breast cancer prediction and classification using machine learning algorithms. In2018 International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT) 1–6

Kim TK (2017) Understanding one-way ANOVA using conceptual figures. Korean J Anesthesiol 70:22–6

Kira K, Rendell LA (1992) A practical approach to feature selection. InMachine Learn Proc 1:249–256

Kiselev VY, Andrews TS, Hemberg M (2019) Challenges in unsupervised clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat Rev Genet 20:273–282

Kobak D, Berens P (2019) The art of using t-SNE for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Commun.;10

Kohavi R, John GH (1997) Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif Intell 97:273–324

Kohonen T (1990) The self-organizing map. Proc IEEE 78:1464–1480

Kononenko I (1994) Estimating attributes Analysis and extensions of RELIEF. European conference on machine learning 171–182

Kumar CA, Sooraj MP, Ramakrishnan S (2017) A comparative performance evaluation of supervised feature selection algorithms on microarray datasets. Procedia computer science.115:209–17

Kusairi RM, Moorthy K, Haron H, Mohamad MS, Napis S, Kasim S (2017) An improved parallelized mRMR for gene subset selection in cancer classification. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 7:1595–1600

Lackner AI, Pollheimer J, Latos P, Knöfler M, Haider S (2023) Gene-network based analysis of human placental trophoblast subtypes identifies critical genes as potential targets of therapeutic drugs. J Integr Bioinform 20:20230011

Lall S, Ray S, Bandyopadhyay S (2021) RgCop-A regularized copula based method for gene selection in single-cell RNA-seq data. PLoS computational biology. 17

Lall S, Ghosh A, Ray S, Bandyopadhyay S (2022) sc-REnF: An entropy guided robust feature selection for single-cell RNA-seq data. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 23:bbab517

Lazar C, Taminau J, Meganck S, (2012) A Survey on Filter Techniques for Feature Selection in Gene Expression Microarray Analysis. 9:1106-1119

Li Z, Liao B, Cai L, Chen M, Liu W (2018) Semi-supervised maximum discriminative local margin for gene selection. Sci Rep 8:8619

Li K, Wang F, Yang L, Liu R (2023) Deep feature screening: Feature selection for ultra high-dimensional data via deep neural networks. Neurocomputing 538:126186

Li C, Xu J (2019) Feature selection with the Fisher score followed by the Maximal Clique Centrality algorithm can accurately identify the hub genes of hepatocellular carcinoma.1–11

Li A, Jia P, Mallik S, Fei R, Yoshioka H, Suzuki A (2020) Critical microRNAs and regulatory motifs in cleft palate identified by a conserved miRNA – TF – gene network approach in humans and mice. 21:1465–1478

Liang S, Mohanty V, Dou J, Miao Q, Huang Y (2021) Single-cell manifold-preserving feature selection for detecting rare cell populations. Nature Comput Sci 1:374–384

Liao B, Jiang Y, Liang W, Zhu W, Cai L, Cao Z (2014) Gene selection using locality sensitive Laplacian score. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 11:1146–1156

Liu M, Zhang D (2016) Pairwise constraint-guided sparse learning for feature selection. IEEE Trans Cybern 46:298–310

Liu Y, Nie F, Wu J, Chen L (2013) Efficient semi-supervised feature selection with noise insensitive trace ratio criterion. Neurocomputing 105:12–18

Liu S, Xu C, Zhang Y (2018) Feature selection of gene expression data for Cancer classification using double RBF kernels. BMC Bioinformatics 19:1–14

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Liu G, Ma J, Hu T, Gao X (2022) A feature selection method with feature ranking using genetic programming. Conn Sci 34:1146–1168

Liu K, Chen Q, Huang GH (2023) An Efficient Feature Selection Algorithm for Gene Families Using NMF and ReliefF. Genes (Basel).14

Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 15: 550

Lu H, Chen J, Yan K, Jin Q, Xue Y, Gao Z (2017) A hybrid feature selection algorithm for gene expression data classification. Neurocomputing 256:56–62

Mallick K, Chakraborty S, Mallik S, Bandyopadhyay S (2023) A scalable unsupervised learning of scRNAseq data detects rare cells through integration of structure-preserving embedding, clustering and outlier detection. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 24:bbad125

Mallik S, Zhao Z (2019) Multi-objective optimized fuzzy clustering for detecting cell clusters from single-cell expression profiles. Genes 10:611

Mallik S, Bhadra T, Maulik U (2017) Identifying Epigenetic Biomarkers using Maximal Relevance and Minimal Redundancy Based Feature Selection for Multi-Omics Data. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 16:3–10

Mallik S, Mukhopadhyay A, Maulik U. (2014) Integrated statistical and rule-mining techniques for DNA methylation and gene. 3:101-115

Manikandan G, Abirami S (2018) A survey on feature selection and extraction techniques for high-dimensional microarray datasets. Knowl Comput Appl Knowl Comput Specific Domains 2:311–333

Manikandan G, Susi E, Abirami S (2018) Flexible-Fuzzy Mutual Information based Feature Selection on High Dimensional Data. 10th International Conference on Advanced Computing, ICoAC 2018. 237–243

Maulik U, Chakraborty D (2014) Fuzzy preference-based feature selection and semisupervised SVM for cancer classification. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 13:152–160

Maulik U, Mukhopadhyay A, Chakraborty D (2013) Gene-expression-based cancer subtypes prediction through feature selection and transductive SVM. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60:1111–1117

Medjahed SA, Saadi TA, Benyettou A, Ouali M (2017) Kernel-based learning, and feature selection analysis for cancer diagnosis. Appl Soft Comput 51:39–48

Miao J, Niu L (2016) A Survey on Feature Selection. Procedia Comput Sci 91:919–926

Moorthy U, Gandhi UD (2021) A novel optimal feature selection technique for medical data classification using ANOVA based whale optimization. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12:3527–3538

Motieghader H, Najafi A, Sadeghi B, Masoudi-Nejad A (2017) A hybrid gene selection algorithm for microarray cancer classification using genetic algorithm and learning automata. Inform Med Unlocked 9:246–254

Mudiyanselage TKB, Xiao X, Zhang Y, Pan Y (2020) Deep Fuzzy Neural Networks for Biomarker Selection for Accurate Cancer Detection. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 28:3219–3228

Muthukrishnan R, Rohini R (2016) LASSO: A feature selection technique in predictive modeling for machine learning. In2016 IEEE international conference on advances in computer applications (ICACA). 18–20

Nandi S, Ganguli P, Sarkar RR (2020) Essential gene prediction using limited gene essentiality information–An integrative semi-supervised machine learning strategy. PLoS ONE 30:15

Nelson ME, Riva SG, Cvejic A (2022) SMaSH: a scalable, general marker gene identification framework for single-cell RNA-sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 23:328

Octaria EA, Siswantining T, Bustamam A, Sarwinda D (2020) Kernel PCA and SVM-RFE based feature selection for classification of dengue microarray dataset. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 2264

Olaolu AM, Abdulsalam SO, Mope IR, Kazeem GA (2018) A comparative analysis of feature selection and feature extraction models for classifying microarray dataset. Comput Inf Syst J 29:1

Palazzo M, Beauseroy P, Yankilevich P. (2020) Unsupervised feature selection for tumor profiles using autoencoders and kernel methods. In: 2020 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB). 1–8

Pan X, Peng R, Zhang B (2024) Single-cell RNA sequencing opens a new era for cotton genomic research and gene functional analysis. J Cotton Res 7(1):17

Paplomatas P, Krokidis MG, Vlamos P, Vrahatis AG (2023) An ensemble feature selection approach for analysis and modeling of transcriptome data in alzheimer’s disease. Appl Sci 13:2353

Pashaei E, Pashaei E (2020) Gene selection for cancer classification using a new hybrid of binary black hole algorithm. In2020 28th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) 1–4

Pearson K LIII (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and J Sci. 2:559-572

Peng H, Long F, Ding C (2005) Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27:1226–1238

Piao Y, Ryu KH. (2017) Detection of differentially expressed genes using feature selection approach from RNA-seq. IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp). 304–308

Pinto da Costa JF, Alonso H, Roque L (2011) A Weighted Principal Component Analysis and Its Application to Gene Expression Data. in IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 8: 246–252

Potharaju SP, Sreedevi M (2019) Distributed feature selection (DFS) strategy for microarray gene expression data to improve the classification performance. Clin Epidemiol Global Health 7:171–176

Prabhakar SK, Lee SW (2020) Transformation Based Tri-Level Feature Selection Approach Using Wavelets and Swarm Computing for Prostate Cancer Classification. IEEE Access 8:127462–127476

Pudjihartono N (2022) A review of feature selection methods for machine learning-based disease risk prediction. Front Bioinform 2:927312

Qiu F, Zheng P, Heidari AA (2022) Mutational Slime Mould Algorithm for Gene Selection. Biomedicines 10:1–34

Radovic M, Ghalwash M, Filipovic N, Obradovic Z (2017) Minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection approach for temporal gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 18:1–14

Rai P, Sengupta D, Majumdar A (2022) SelfE: Gene Selection via Self-Expression for Single-Cell Data. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 19:624–632

Ranganarayanan P, Thanigesan N, Ananth V, Jayaraman VK, Ramakrishnan V (2015) Identification of glucose-binding pockets in human serum albumin using support vector machine and molecular dynamics simulations. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 13:148–157

Ranjan B, Sun W, Park J, Mishra K, Schmidt F (2021) DUBStepR is a scalable correlation-based feature selection method for accurately clustering single-cell data. Nat Commun 12:5849

Rathore S, Iftikhar MA, Hussain M (2014) A novel approach for automatic gene selection and classification of gene-based colon cancer datasets. Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Emerging Technologies, ICET 2014. 42–47

Raymer ML, Punch WF, Goodman ED, Kuhn LA, Jain AK (2000) Dimensionality reduction using genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 4:164–171

Reel PS, Reel S, Pearson E, Trucco E, Jefferson E (2021) Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review. Biotechnol Adv 49:107739

Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Di Wu, Yifang Hu, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK (2014) limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43:e47

Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140

Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Lê Cao KA (2017) mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput Biol. 13

Saeys Y, Inza I, Larrañaga P (2007a) A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 23:2507–2517

Saeys Y, Inza I, Larranaga P (2007) A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. bioinformatics. 23:2507–17

Saha S, Spandana R, Ekbal A, Bandyopadhyay S (2015a) Simultaneous feature selection and symmetry based clustering using multiobjective framework. Applied Soft Computing Journal 29:479–486

Saha S, Alok AK, Member S, Ekbal A (2015) Use of Semi-supervised Clustering and Feature Selection Techniques for Gene-Expression Data. 2194:1-7

Saha, Suparna et al. (2022) A Multi-Molecular Fusion to Detect Transcriptomic Signature in Tissue-Specific Cancer. Eurasian J Med Oncol, 6:156

Sahin CB, Diri B (2019) Robust Feature Selection with LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Artificial Immune Recognition System. IEEE Access 7:24165–24178

Sahu B, Dehuri S, Jagadev A (2018) A Study on the Relevance of Feature Selection Methods in Microarray Data. Open Bioinforma J 11:117–139

Sampathkumar A, Rastogi R, Arukonda S, Shankar A, Kautish S, Sivaram M (2020) An efficient hybrid methodology for detection of cancer-causing gene using CSC for micro array data. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11:4743–4751

Sanz H, Valim C, Vegas E, Oller JM, Reverter F (2018) SVM-RFE: Selection and visualization of the most relevant features through non-linear kernels. BMC Bioinformatics 19:1–18

Schmidt B, Hildebrandt A (2021) Deep learning in next-generation sequencing. Drug Discovery Today 26:173–180

Serrano K, Tedeschi F, Andersen SU, Scheller HV. Unraveling plant–microbe symbioses using single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Trends in Plant Science. 2024 Jul 10

Seth S, Mallik S, Islam A, Bhadra T, Roy A, Singh PK, Li A, Zhao Z (2023) Identifying genetic signatures from single-cell rna sequencing data by matrix imputation and reduced set gene clustering. Mathematics 11:4315

Seth S, Mallik S, Bhadra T, Zhao Z (2022) Dimensionality Reduction and Louvain Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering for Cluster-Specified Frequent Biomarker Discovery in Single-Cell Sequencing Data. Front Genet. 13

Sheng J, Amankwah-Amoah J, Khan Z, Wang X (2021) COVID-19 pandemic in the new era of big data analytics: Methodological innovations and future research directions. Br J Manag 32:1164–1183

Shukla AK, Singh P, Vardhan M (2018) A hybrid gene selection method for microarray recognition. Biocybern Biomed Eng 38:975–991

Silva R, Melo-Pinto P (2023) t-SNE: A study on reducing the dimensionality of hyperspectral data for the regression problem of estimating oenological parameters. Artif Intell Agric 7:58–68

Solorio-Fernández S, Martínez-Trinidad JF, Carrasco-Ochoa JA, Zhang YQ (2012) Hybrid feature selection method for biomedical datasets. In 2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) 150–155

Solorio-fernández S, Martínez-trinidad JAC, Ochoa JF (2019) A review of unsupervised feature selection methods. Artif Intell Rev. 53, 907–948

Su K, Yu T, Wu H (2021) Accurate feature selection improves single-cell RNA-seq cell clustering. Briefings in Bioinform. 22:bbab034

Su K, Yu T, Wu H (2021) Accurate feature selection improves single-cell RNA-seq cell clustering. Briefings in bioinformatics. 22(5):bbab034

s Sun L, Zhang XY, Qian YH, Xu JC, Zhang SG, Tian Y. (2019) Joint neighborhood entropy-based gene selection method with fisher score for tumor classification. Appl Intell. 49:1245-59

Swarnkar T, Mitra P (2015) Graph-based unsupervised feature selection and multiview clustering for microarray data. J Biosci 40:755–767

Tadist K, Najah S, Nikolov NS, Mrabti F, Zahi A. (2019) Feature selection methods and genomic big data: a systematic review. J Big Data. 6(1)

Tang J, Wang Y, Luo Y (2020) Computational advances of tumor marker selection and sample classification in cancer proteomics. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 18:2012–2025

Thakur T, Batra I, Malik A, Ghimire D, Kim SH, Hosen AS (2023) RNN-CNN based cancer prediction model for gene expression. IEEE Access 11:131024–131044

Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 58:267–288

Urbanowicz RJ, Meeker M, La Cava W, Olson RS, Moore JH (2018) Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review. J Biomed Inform 85:189–203

Vanjimalar S, Ramyachitra D, Manikandan P (2018) A review on feature selection techniques for gene expression data. In2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC) 1–4

Varet H, Brillet-Guéguen L, Coppée JY, Dillies MA (2016) SARTools: a DESeq2-and EdgeR-based R pipeline for comprehensive differential analysis of RNA-Seq data. PloS one. 11

Venkataramana L, Jacob SG, Ramadoss R, Saisuma D, Haritha D, Manoja K (2019) Improving classification accuracy of cancer types using parallel hybrid feature selection on microarray gene expression data. Genes & Genomics 41:1301–1313

Venkatesh B, Anuradha J. (2019) A Review of Feature Selection and Its Methods. 19:3-26 https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2019-0001

Wang Y (2018) Unsupervised representative feature selection algorithm based on information entropy and relevance analysis. IEEE Access 6:45317–45324

Wang Y, Gao J, Xuan C (2022) FSCAM: CAM-Based Feature Selection for Clustering scRNA-seq. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci 14:394–408

Wang X, Lin X, Huang X, Yang Y (2015) Ensemble unsupervised feature selection based on permutation and R-value. In2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD) 795–800

Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ (2018) SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome biology 19:1–5

Wu Y, Hu Q, Wang S, Liu C, Shan Y (2022) Highly Regional Genes: graph-based gene selection for single-cell RNA-seq data. J Genet Genomics 49:891–899

Xie J, Wang M, Xu S, Huang Z, Grant PW (2021) The Unsupervised Feature Selection Algorithms Based on Standard Deviation and Cosine Similarity for Genomic Data Analysis. Front Genet. 1–17

Xu L, Liang G, Liao C, Chen GD, Chang CC (2019a) K-skip-n-gram-RF: a random Forest-based method for Alzheimer’s disease protein identification. Front Genet 10:33

Xu X, Gu H, Wang Y, Wang J, Qin P (2019b) Autoencoder based feature selection method for classification of anticancer drug response. Front Genet 10:233

Xu D, Zhang J, Xu H, Zhang Y, Chen W, Gao R, Dehmer M (2020a) Multi-scale supervised clustering-based feature selection for tumor classification and identification of biomarkers and targets on genomic data. BMC Genomics 21:1–7

Xu D, Zhang J, Xu H, Zhang Y, Chen W, Gao R, Dehmer M (2020) Multi-scale supervised clustering-based feature selection for tumor classification and identification of biomarkers and targets on genomic data. BMC Genomics. 21:1–7

Yang Y, Sun H, Zhang Y (2021) Dimensionality reduction by UMAP reinforces sample heterogeneity analysis in bulk transcriptomic data. Cell Rep. 36

Yaping Z, Changyin Z (2021) Gene feature selection method based on Relieff and Pearson correlation. In2021 3rd international conference on applied machine learning (ICAML) pp. 15–19

Yu N, Wu MJ, Liu JX, Zheng CH, Xu Y (2021) Correntropy-Based Hypergraph Regularized NMF for Clustering and Feature Selection on Multi-Cancer Integrated Data. IEEE Trans Cybern 51:3952–3963

Zebari R, Abdulazeez A, Zeebaree D, Zebari D, Saeed J (2020) A comprehensive review of dimensionality reduction techniques for feature selection and feature extraction. J Appl Sci Technol Trends 1:56–70

Zhang L (2021) A feature selection algorithm integrating maximum classification information and minimum interaction feature dependency information. Comput Intell Neurosci 2021:3569632

Zhang D, Zou L, Zhou X, He F (2018a) Integrating Feature Selection and Feature Extraction Methods with Deep Learning to Predict Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer. IEEE Access 6:28936–28944

Zhang Y, Deng Q, Liang W, Zou X (2018b) An efficient feature selection strategy based on multiple support vector machine technology with gene expression data. Biomed Res Int 2018:7538204

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Zhang YH, Zeng T, Chen L, Huang T, Cai YD (2021) Determining protein–protein functional associations by functional rules based on gene ontology and KEGG pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 1869

Zhu L, Miao L, Zhang D (2012) Iterative Laplacian score for feature selection. Commun Comput Inform Sci 321:80–87

Download references

The authors received no funding from their institutes for this research work.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Cotton University, Panbazar, Guwahati, 781001, Assam, India

Kasmika Borah & Himanish Shekhar Das

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Future Institute of Engineering and Management, Narendrapur, Kolkata, 700150, West Bengal, India

Soumita Seth

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, RCC Institute of Information Technology, Canal S Rd, Beleghata, Kolkata, 700015, West Bengal, India

Koushik Mallick

Vitas Healthcare, Kissimmee, FL, USA

Zubair Rahaman

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

Saurav Mallik

Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

K.B., H.S.D., K.M., and S.M. all participated in the scheming of the study. K.B. and H.S.D., writing the manuscript. H.S.D, S.S., K.M., Z.R., and S.M, reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Himanish Shekhar Das or Saurav Mallik .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

No competing interest is declared.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Borah, K., Das, H.S., Seth, S. et al. A review on advancements in feature selection and feature extraction for high-dimensional NGS data analysis. Funct Integr Genomics 24 , 139 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-024-01415-x

Download citation

Received : 01 June 2024

Revised : 30 July 2024

Accepted : 01 August 2024

Published : 19 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-024-01415-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Feature Selection
• Feature Extraction
• Dimensionality Reduction
• Next Generation Sequencing data
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Primary care clinicians working in or near hospital emergency departments in the UK: A mixed methods systematic review

• Find this author on Google Scholar
• Find this author on PubMed
• Search for this author on this site
• ORCID record for Stephanie Howard Wilsher
• For correspondence: [email protected]
• ORCID record for Julii Brainard
• Info/History
• Preview PDF

Objectives To synthesise evidence about primary care clinicians treating patients in or adjacent to hospital emergency departments in the UK.

Study design Mixed methods narrative systematic review.

Methods Eligible studies were in English and described primary care services (general practitioners, GPs, or nurse practitioners) that treat patients within or adjacent to hospital Emergency Departments (ED). Searches were conducted on Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases. The search included extraction from an international review updated from 2020 to October 2022, and grey literature from inception to October 2022. The methods were informed by consultation with members of the public.

Results From 4189 studies screened, 20 met inclusion criteria. Four studies assessed typology and streaming of services. Seven studies reported patient and public involvement. Ten studies reported differences in clinical outcomes between primary care and emergency services, but not definitive benefit for either. Likewise, results were equivocal for economic evaluations. Diverse delivery formats complicate evaluation and may explain why clinicians had mixed opinions about the utility of such services. Patients were generally satisfied with the service they received, in either primary care or emergency services.

Conclusion Diversity of implementation complicate conclusions that can be drawn. Existing evaluations provide little evidence that primary care services in or near emergency departments offers any system advantages for clinical outcomes, or cost savings. Process evaluation in future evaluations is essential to understand what aspects of primary care at emergency departments are likely to improve system and patient care.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care The systematic review assessed outcomes arising due to primary care clinicians providing treatment in or near Emergency Departments (ED) in the UK. There were no consistent benefits for having primary care clinicians in or near EDs. This research highlights the need for healthcare leaders and policy makers to provide more clarity in developing primary care services in or near EDs. It will have impact for leaders in healthcare to consider whether primary care clinicians in or near EDs are providing ‘best value’ healthcare, or whether other models could provide patients appropriate NHS resources according to their health need.

Patient and public involvement Three focus groups (with 13 public advisors) were conducted to understand patients’ priorities and perspectives for attending EDs with relatively minor health conditions. This helped to guide study design, data extraction and analysis of this review.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

University of East Anglia Health and Social Care Partners Research Capacity Building Programme Funding Call 2022-23. Dr. Brainard is affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London in partnership with the UK Health Security Agency (UK HSA) and collaboration with the University of East Anglia. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the UEA-HSCP, NHS, NIHR, UEA, UK Department of Health or HSA.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ethics Committee at UEA guidelines are that this work does not require ethical approval because the analysis is on published aggregate and anonymised data in the public domain.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

View the discussion thread.

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Citation Manager Formats

• EndNote (tagged)
• EndNote 8 (xml)
• RefWorks Tagged
• Ref Manager
• Tweet Widget
• Facebook Like
• Google Plus One

Subject Area

• Health Systems and Quality Improvement
• Addiction Medicine (342)
• Allergy and Immunology (665)
• Anesthesia (180)
• Cardiovascular Medicine (2625)
• Dentistry and Oral Medicine (314)
• Dermatology (222)
• Emergency Medicine (397)
• Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (930)
• Epidemiology (12175)
• Forensic Medicine (10)
• Gastroenterology (756)
• Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4064)
• Geriatric Medicine (384)
• Health Economics (676)
• Health Informatics (2625)
• Health Policy (997)
• Health Systems and Quality Improvement (979)
• Hematology (360)
• HIV/AIDS (845)
• Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13659)
• Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (790)
• Medical Education (398)
• Medical Ethics (109)
• Nephrology (430)
• Neurology (3832)
• Nursing (209)
• Nutrition (570)
• Obstetrics and Gynecology (734)
• Occupational and Environmental Health (690)
• Oncology (2008)
• Ophthalmology (581)
• Orthopedics (238)
• Otolaryngology (304)
• Pain Medicine (250)
• Palliative Medicine (73)
• Pathology (471)
• Pediatrics (1107)
• Pharmacology and Therapeutics (459)
• Primary Care Research (447)
• Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3400)
• Public and Global Health (6499)
• Radiology and Imaging (1390)
• Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (806)
• Respiratory Medicine (869)
• Rheumatology (400)
• Sexual and Reproductive Health (407)
• Sports Medicine (338)
• Surgery (441)
• Toxicology (52)
• Transplantation (185)
• Urology (165)

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Advancements in deep learning techniques for time series forecasting in maritime applications: a comprehensive review.

1. Introduction

2. literature collection procedure.

• Search scope: Titles, Keywords, and Abstracts
• Keywords 1: ‘deep’ AND ‘learning’, AND
• Keywords 2: ‘time AND series’, AND
• Keywords 3: ‘maritime’, OR
• Keywords 4: ‘vessel’, OR
• Keywords 5: ‘shipping’, OR
• Keywords 6: ‘marine’, OR
• Keywords 7: ‘ship’, OR
• Keywords 8: ‘port’, OR
• Keywords 9: ‘terminal’
• Retain only articles related to maritime operations. For example, studies on ship-surrounding weather and risk prediction based on ship data will be kept, while research solely focused on marine weather or wave prediction that is unrelated to any aspect of maritime operations will be excluded.
• Exclude neural network studies that do not employ deep learning techniques, such as ANN or MLP with only one hidden layer.
• The language of the publications must be English.
• The original data used in the papers must include time series sequences.

3. Deep Learning Algorithms

3.1. artificial neural network (ann), 3.1.1. multilayer perceptron (mlp)/deep neural networks (dnn), 3.1.2. wavenet, 3.1.3. randomized neural network, 3.2. convolutional neural network (cnn), 3.3. recurrent neural network (rnn), 3.3.1. long short-term memory (lstm), 3.3.2. gated recurrent unit (gru), 3.4. attention mechanism (am)/transformer, 3.5. overview of algorithms usage, 4. time series forecasting in maritime applications, 4.1. ship operation-related applications, 4.1.1. ship trajectory prediction, 4.1.2. meteorological factor prediction, 4.1.3. ship fuel consumption prediction, 4.1.4. others, 4.2. port operation-related applications, 4.3. shipping market-related applications, 4.4. overview of time series forecasting in maritime applications, 5. overall analysis, 5.1. literature description, 5.1.1. literature distribution, 5.1.2. literature classification, 5.2. data utilized in maritime research, 5.2.1. automatic identification system data (ais data), 5.2.2. high-frequency radar data and sensor data, 5.2.3. container throughput data, 5.2.4. other datasets, 5.3. evaluation parameters, 5.4. real-world application examples, 5.5. future research directions, 5.5.1. data processing and feature extraction, 5.5.2. model optimization and application of new technologies, 5.5.3. specific application scenarios, 5.5.4. practical applications and long-term predictions, 5.5.5. environmental impact, fault prediction, and cross-domain applications, 6. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2023 ; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789213584569 (accessed on 1 April 2024).
• Liang, M.; Liu, R.W.; Zhan, Y.; Li, H.; Zhu, F.; Wang, F.Y. Fine-Grained Vessel Traffic Flow Prediction With a Spatio-Temporal Multigraph Convolutional Network. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022 , 23 , 23694–23707. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, R.W.; Liang, M.; Nie, J.; Lim, W.Y.B.; Zhang, Y.; Guizani, M. Deep Learning-Powered Vessel Trajectory Prediction for Improving Smart Traffic Services in Maritime Internet of Things. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2022 , 9 , 3080–3094. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dui, H.; Zheng, X.; Wu, S. Resilience analysis of maritime transportation systems based on importance measures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021 , 209 , 107461. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liang, M.; Li, H.; Liu, R.W.; Lam, J.S.L.; Yang, Z. PiracyAnalyzer: Spatial temporal patterns analysis of global piracy incidents. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2024 , 243 , 109877. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, Z.S.; Lam, J.S.L.; Xiao, Z. Prediction of harbour vessel emissions based on machine learning approach. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2024 , 131 , 104214. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, Z.S.; Lam, J.S.L.; Xiao, Z. Prediction of harbour vessel fuel consumption based on machine learning approach. Ocean Eng. 2023 , 278 , 114483. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liang, M.; Weng, L.; Gao, R.; Li, Y.; Du, L. Unsupervised maritime anomaly detection for intelligent situational awareness using AIS data. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2024 , 284 , 111313. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dave, V.S.; Dutta, K. Neural network based models for software effort estimation: A review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2014 , 42 , 295–307. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Uslu, S.; Celik, M.B. Prediction of engine emissions and performance with artificial neural networks in a single cylinder diesel engine using diethyl ether. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2018 , 21 , 1194–1201. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chaudhary, L.; Sharma, S.; Sajwan, M. Systematic Literature Review of Various Neural Network Techniques for Sea Surface Temperature Prediction Using Remote Sensing Data. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2023 , 30 , 5071–5103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dharia, A.; Adeli, H. Neural network model for rapid forecasting of freeway link travel time. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2003 , 16 , 607–613. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hecht-Nielsen, R. Applications of counterpropagation networks. Neural Netw. 1988 , 1 , 131–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A. Deep Learning ; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Veerappa, M.; Anneken, M.; Burkart, N. Evaluation of Interpretable Association Rule Mining Methods on Time-Series in the Maritime Domain. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 204–218. [ Google Scholar ]
• Frizzell, J.; Furth, M. Prediction of Vessel RAOs: Applications of Deep Learning to Assist in Design. In Proceedings of the SNAME 27th Offshore Symposium, Houston, TX, USA, 22 February 2022. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van Den Oord, A.; Dieleman, S.; Zen, H.; Simonyan, K.; Vinyals, O.; Graves, A.; Kalchbrenner, N.; Senior, A.; Kavukcuoglu, K. Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv 2016 , arXiv:1609.03499. [ Google Scholar ]
• He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016; pp. 770–778. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ning, C.X.; Xie, Y.Z.; Sun, L.J. LSTM, WaveNet, and 2D CNN for nonlinear time history prediction of seismic responses. Eng. Struct. 2023 , 286 , 116083. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schmidt, W.F.; Kraaijveld, M.A.; Duin, R.P. Feed forward neural networks with random weights. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition ; IEEE Computer Society Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1992; pp. 1–4. [ Google Scholar ]
• Huang, G.B.; Zhu, Q.Y.; Siew, C.K. Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications. Neurocomputing 2006 , 70 , 489–501. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pao, Y.H.; Park, G.H.; Sobajic, D.J. Learning and generalization characteristics of the random vector functional-link net. Neurocomputing 1994 , 6 , 163–180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, L.; Suganthan, P.N. A comprehensive evaluation of random vector functional link networks. Inf. Sci. 2016 , 367 , 1094–1105. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huang, G.; Huang, G.B.; Song, S.J.; You, K.Y. Trends in extreme learning machines: A review. Neural Netw. 2015 , 61 , 32–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shi, Q.S.; Katuwal, R.; Suganthan, P.N.; Tanveer, M. Random vector functional link neural network based ensemble deep learning. Pattern Recognit. 2021 , 117 , 107978. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Du, L.; Gao, R.B.; Suganthan, P.N.; Wang, D.Z.W. Graph ensemble deep random vector functional link network for traffic forecasting. Appl. Soft Comput. 2022 , 131 , 109809. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rehman, A.; Xing, H.L.; Hussain, M.; Gulzar, N.; Khan, M.A.; Hussain, A.; Mahmood, S. HCDP-DELM: Heterogeneous chronic disease prediction with temporal perspective enabled deep extreme learning machine. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2024 , 284 , 111316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gao, R.B.; Li, R.L.; Hu, M.H.; Suganthan, P.N.; Yuen, K.F. Online dynamic ensemble deep random vector functional link neural network for forecasting. Neural Netw. 2023 , 166 , 51–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lecun, Y.; Bottou, L.; Bengio, Y.; Haffner, P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 1998 , 86 , 2278–2324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Palaz, D.; Magimai-Doss, M.; Collobert, R. End-to-end acoustic modeling using convolutional neural networks for HMM-based automatic speech recognition. Speech Commun. 2019 , 108 , 15–32. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fang, W.; Love, P.E.D.; Luo, H.; Ding, L. Computer vision for behaviour-based safety in construction: A review and future directions. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2020 , 43 , 100980. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Qin, L.; Yu, N.; Zhao, D. Applying the convolutional neural network deep learning technology to behavioural recognition in intelligent video. Teh. Vjesn. 2018 , 25 , 528–535. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hoseinzade, E.; Haratizadeh, S. CNNpred: CNN-based stock market prediction using a diverse set of variables. Expert Syst. Appl. 2019 , 129 , 273–285. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rasp, S.; Dueben, P.D.; Scher, S.; Weyn, J.A.; Mouatadid, S.; Thuerey, N. WeatherBench: A Benchmark Data Set for Data-Driven Weather Forecasting. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 2020 , 12 , e2020MS002203. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Crivellari, A.; Beinat, E.; Caetano, S.; Seydoux, A.; Cardoso, T. Multi-target CNN-LSTM regressor for predicting urban distribution of short-term food delivery demand. J. Bus. Res. 2022 , 144 , 844–853. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bai, S.; Kolter, J.Z.; Koltun, V. An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv 2018 , arXiv:1803.01271. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lin, Z.; Yue, W.; Huang, J.; Wan, J. Ship Trajectory Prediction Based on the TTCN-Attention-GRU Model. Electronics 2023 , 12 , 2556. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J. Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016 ; Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 630–645. [ Google Scholar ]
• Srivastava, N.; Hinton, G.; Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 , 15 , 1929–1958. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bin Syed, M.A.; Ahmed, I. A CNN-LSTM Architecture for Marine Vessel Track Association Using Automatic Identification System (AIS) Data. Sensors 2023 , 23 , 6400. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Li, M.-W.; Xu, D.-Y.; Geng, J.; Hong, W.-C. A hybrid approach for forecasting ship motion using CNN–GRU–AM and GCWOA. Appl. Soft Comput. 2022 , 114 , 108084. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, B.; Wang, S.; Deng, L.; Jia, M.; Xu, J. Ship motion attitude prediction model based on IWOA-TCN-Attention. Ocean Eng. 2023 , 272 , 113911. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Elman, J.L. Finding Structure in Time. Cogn. Sci. 1990 , 14 , 179–211. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shan, F.; He, X.; Armaghani, D.J.; Sheng, D. Effects of data smoothing and recurrent neural network (RNN) algorithms for real-time forecasting of tunnel boring machine (TBM) performance. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2024 , 16 , 1538–1551. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Apaydin, H.; Feizi, H.; Sattari, M.T.; Colak, M.S.; Shamshirband, S.; Chau, K.-W. Comparative Analysis of Recurrent Neural Network Architectures for Reservoir Inflow Forecasting. Water 2020 , 12 , 1500. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J. MM-RNN: A Multimodal RNN for Precipitation Nowcasting. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2023 , 61 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lu, M.; Xu, X. TRNN: An efficient time-series recurrent neural network for stock price prediction. Inf. Sci. 2024 , 657 , 119951. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bengio, Y.; Simard, P.; Frasconi, P. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1994 , 5 , 157–166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kratzert, F.; Klotz, D.; Brenner, C.; Schulz, K.; Herrnegger, M. Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2018 , 22 , 6005–6022. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hochreiter, S. Untersuchungen zu dynamischen neuronalen Netzen. Diploma Tech. Univ. München 1991 , 91 , 31. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hochreiter, S.; Schmidhuber, J. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Comput. 1997 , 9 , 1735–1780. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Gers, F.A.; Schmidhuber, J.; Cummins, F. Learning to Forget: Continual Prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput. 2000 , 12 , 2451–2471. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Witten, I.H.; Frank, E. Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations. SIGMOD Rec. 2002 , 31 , 76–77. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mo, J.X.; Gao, R.B.; Liu, J.H.; Du, L.; Yuen, K.F. Annual dilated convolutional LSTM network for time charter rate forecasting. Appl. Soft Comput. 2022 , 126 , 109259. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cho, K.; Van Merriënboer, B.; Bahdanau, D.; Bengio, Y. On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches. arXiv 2014 , arXiv:1409.1259. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yang, S.; Yu, X.; Zhou, Y. LSTM and GRU Neural Network Performance Comparison Study: Taking Yelp Review Dataset as an Example. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Workshop on Electronic Communication and Artificial Intelligence (IWECAI), Shanghai, China, 12–14 June 2020; pp. 98–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhao, Z.N.; Yun, S.N.; Jia, L.Y.; Guo, J.X.; Meng, Y.; He, N.; Li, X.J.; Shi, J.R.; Yang, L. Hybrid VMD-CNN-GRU-based model for short-term forecasting of wind power considering spatio-temporal features. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023 , 121 , 105982. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pan, N.; Ding, Y.; Fu, J.; Wang, J.; Zheng, H. Research on Ship Arrival Law Based on Route Matching and Deep Learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021 , 1952 , 022023. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, J.; Li, W.K.; Jia, C.F.; Zhang, C.W.; Zhang, Y. Risk Prediction for Ship Encounter Situation Awareness Using Long Short-Term Memory Based Deep Learning on Intership Behaviors. J. Adv. Transp. 2020 , 2020 , 8897700. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Suo, Y.F.; Chen, W.K.; Claramunt, C.; Yang, S.H. A Ship Trajectory Prediction Framework Based on a Recurrent Neural Network. Sensors 2020 , 20 , 5133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bahdanau, D.; Cho, K.; Bengio, Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv 2014 , arXiv:1409.0473. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A.N.; Kaiser, Ł.; Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2017 , 30 , 03762. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nascimento, E.G.S.; de Melo, T.A.C.; Moreira, D.M. A transformer-based deep neural network with wavelet transform for forecasting wind speed and wind energy. Energy 2023 , 278 , 127678. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Niu, J.; Wu, Q.M.J.; Li, G. Track Prediction for HF Radar Vessels Submerged in Strong Clutter Based on MSCNN Fusion with GRU-AM and AR Model. Remote Sens. 2021 , 13 , 2164. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, X.; Fu, X.; Xiao, Z.; Xu, H.; Zhang, W.; Koh, J.; Qin, Z. A Dynamic Context-Aware Approach for Vessel Trajectory Prediction Based on Multi-Stage Deep Learning. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2024 , 1–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jiang, D.; Shi, G.; Li, N.; Ma, L.; Li, W.; Shi, J. TRFM-LS: Transformer-Based Deep Learning Method for Vessel Trajectory Prediction. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023 , 11 , 880. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Violos, J.; Tsanakas, S.; Androutsopoulou, M.; Palaiokrassas, G.; Varvarigou, T. Next Position Prediction Using LSTM Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 11th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Athens, Greece, 2–4 September 2020; pp. 232–240. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hoque, X.; Sharma, S.K. Ensembled Deep Learning Approach for Maritime Anomaly Detection System. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology (ICETIT), Inst Informat Technol & Management, New Delhi, India, 21–22 June 2020; In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Volume 605, pp. 862–869. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Fu, H.; Wang, Q. Research on Prediction Method of Ship Rolling Motion Based on Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 39th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Shenyang, China, 27–29 July 2020; pp. 7182–7187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Choi, J. Predicting the Frequency of Marine Accidents by Navigators’ Watch Duty Time in South Korea Using LSTM. Appl. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 11724. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, T.; Li, Y.B. Prediction of ship trajectory based on deep learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023 , 2613 , 012023. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chondrodima, E.; Pelekis, N.; Pikrakis, A.; Theodoridis, Y. An Efficient LSTM Neural Network-Based Framework for Vessel Location Forecasting. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023 , 24 , 4872–4888. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Long, Z.; Suyuan, W.; Zhongma, C.; Jiaqi, F.; Xiaoting, Y.; Wei, D. Lira-YOLO: A lightweight model for ship detection in radar images. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 2020 , 31 , 950–956. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cheng, X.; Li, G.; Skulstad, R.; Zhang, H.; Chen, S. SpectralSeaNet: Spectrogram and Convolutional Network-based Sea State Estimation. In Proceedings of the IECON 2020 the 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Singapore, 18–21 October 2020; pp. 5069–5074. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, K.; Cheng, X.; Shi, F. Learning Dynamic Graph Structures for Sea State Estimation with Deep Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (ICoIAS), Qinhuangdao, China, 22–24 September 2023; pp. 161–166. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yu, J.; Huang, D.; Shi, X.; Li, W.; Wang, X. Real-Time Moving Ship Detection from Low-Resolution Large-Scale Remote Sensing Image Sequence. Appl. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 2584. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ilias, L.; Kapsalis, P.; Mouzakitis, S.; Askounis, D. A Multitask Learning Framework for Predicting Ship Fuel Oil Consumption. IEEE Access 2023 , 11 , 132576–132589. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Selimovic, D.; Hrzic, F.; Prpic-Orsic, J.; Lerga, J. Estimation of sea state parameters from ship motion responses using attention-based neural networks. Ocean Eng. 2023 , 281 , 114915. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, J.; Jia, C.; Yang, X.; Cheng, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, C. A Data-Driven Approach for Collision Risk Early Warning in Vessel Encounter Situations Using Attention-BiLSTM. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 188771–188783. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ji, Z.; Gan, H.; Liu, B. A Deep Learning-Based Fault Warning Model for Exhaust Temperature Prediction and Fault Warning of Marine Diesel Engine. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023 , 11 , 1509. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, Y.; Gan, H.; Cong, Y.; Hu, G. Research on fault prediction of marine diesel engine based on attention-LSTM. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 2023 , 237 , 508–519. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, M.W.; Xu, D.Y.; Geng, J.; Hong, W.C. A ship motion forecasting approach based on empirical mode decomposition method hybrid deep learning network and quantum butterfly optimization algorithm. Nonlinear Dyn. 2022 , 107 , 2447–2467. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, C.H.; Chang, P.Y. Forecasting the Demand for Container Throughput Using a Mixed-Precision Neural Architecture Based on CNN–LSTM. Mathematics 2020 , 8 , 1784. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, W.; Wu, P.; Peng, Y.; Liu, D. Roll Motion Prediction of Unmanned Surface Vehicle Based on Coupled CNN and LSTM. Future Internet 2019 , 11 , 243. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kamal, I.M.; Bae, H.; Sunghyun, S.; Yun, H. DERN: Deep Ensemble Learning Model for Short- and Long-Term Prediction of Baltic Dry Index. Appl. Sci. 2020 , 10 , 1504. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, M.Z.; Li, B.; Qi, Z.G.; Li, J.S.; Wu, J.W. Enhancing Maritime Navigational Safety: Ship Trajectory Prediction Using ACoAtt–LSTM and AIS Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inform. 2024 , 13 , 85. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Yang, J.; Li, W.; Guo, W. Vessel trajectory prediction based on modified LSTM with attention mechanism. In Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Neural Networks, Information and Communication Engineering, NNICE, Guangzhou, China, 19–21 January 2024; pp. 912–918. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xia, C.; Peng, Y.; Qu, D. A pre-trained model specialized for ship trajectory prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Chongqing, China, 15–17 March 2024; pp. 1857–1860. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cheng, X.; Li, G.; Skulstad, R.; Chen, S.; Hildre, H.P.; Zhang, H. Modeling and Analysis of Motion Data from Dynamically Positioned Vessels for Sea State Estimation. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada, 20–24 May 2019; pp. 6644–6650. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xia, C.; Qu, D.; Zheng, Y. TATBformer: A Divide-and-Conquer Approach to Ship Trajectory Prediction Modeling. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 11th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC), Chongqing, China, 8–10 December 2023; pp. 335–339. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ran, Y.; Shi, G.; Li, W. Ship Track Prediction Model based on Automatic Identification System Data and Bidirectional Cyclic Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Symposium on Traffic Transportation and Civil Architecture, ISTTCA, Suzhou, China, 12–14 November 2021; pp. 297–301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, C.H.; Wu, C.H.; Shao, J.C.; Wang, Y.C.; Hsieh, C.M. AIS-Based Intelligent Vessel Trajectory Prediction Using Bi-LSTM. IEEE Access 2022 , 10 , 24302–24315. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sadeghi, Z.; Matwin, S. Anomaly detection for maritime navigation based on probability density function of error of reconstruction. J. Intell. Syst. 2023 , 32 , 20220270. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Perumal, V.; Murugaiyan, S.; Ravichandran, P.; Venkatesan, R.; Sundar, R. Real time identification of anomalous events in coastal regions using deep learning techniques. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2021 , 33 , e6421. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xie, J.L.; Shi, W.F.; Shi, Y.Q. Research on Fault Diagnosis of Six-Phase Propulsion Motor Drive Inverter for Marine Electric Propulsion System Based on Res-BiLSTM. Machines 2022 , 10 , 736. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Han, P.; Li, G.; Skulstad, R.; Skjong, S.; Zhang, H. A Deep Learning Approach to Detect and Isolate Thruster Failures for Dynamically Positioned Vessels Using Motion Data. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021 , 70 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cheng, X.; Wang, K.; Liu, X.; Yu, Q.; Shi, F.; Ren, Z.; Chen, S. A Novel Class-Imbalanced Ship Motion Data-Based Cross-Scale Model for Sea State Estimation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023 , 24 , 15907–15919. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lei, L.; Wen, Z.; Peng, Z. Prediction of Main Engine Speed and Fuel Consumption of Inland Ships Based on Deep Learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021 , 2025 , 012012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ljunggren, H. Using Deep Learning for Classifying Ship Trajectories. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), Cambridge, UK, 10–13 July 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 2158–2164. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kulshrestha, A.; Yadav, A.; Sharma, H.; Suman, S. A deep learning-based multivariate decomposition and ensemble framework for container throughput forecasting. J. Forecast. 2024 , in press . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shankar, S.; Ilavarasan, P.V.; Punia, S.; Singh, S.P. Forecasting container throughput with long short-term memory networks. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2020 , 120 , 425–441. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, E.; Kim, D.; Bae, H. Container Volume Prediction Using Time-Series Decomposition with a Long Short-Term Memory Models. Appl. Sci. 2021 , 11 , 8995. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cuong, T.N.; You, S.-S.; Long, L.N.B.; Kim, H.-S. Seaport Resilience Analysis and Throughput Forecast Using a Deep Learning Approach: A Case Study of Busan Port. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 13985. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Song, X.; Chen, Z.S. Shipping market time series forecasting via an Ensemble Deep Dual-Projection Echo State Network. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2024 , 117 , 109218. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, X.; Hu, Y.; Bai, Y.; Gao, X.; Chen, G. DeepDLP: Deep Reinforcement Learning based Framework for Dynamic Liner Trade Pricing. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2023 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, IMCOM, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 3–5 January 2023; pp. 1–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alqatawna, A.; Abu-Salih, B.; Obeid, N.; Almiani, M. Incorporating Time-Series Forecasting Techniques to Predict Logistics Companies’ Staffing Needs and Order Volume. Computation 2023 , 11 , 141. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lim, S.; Kim, S.J.; Park, Y.; Kwon, N. A deep learning-based time series model with missing value handling techniques to predict various types of liquid cargo traffic. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021 , 184 , 115532. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cheng, R.; Gao, R.; Yuen, K.F. Ship order book forecasting by an ensemble deep parsimonious random vector functional link network. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024 , 133 , 108139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xiao, Z.; Fu, X.J.; Zhang, L.Y.; Goh, R.S.M. Traffic Pattern Mining and Forecasting Technologies in Maritime Traffic Service Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020 , 21 , 1796–1825. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yan, R.; Wang, S.A.; Psaraftis, H.N. Data analytics for fuel consumption management in maritime transportation: Status and perspectives. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2021 , 155 , 102489. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Filom, S.; Amiri, A.M.; Razavi, S. Applications of machine learning methods in port operations—A systematic literature review. Transp. Res. Part E-Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022 , 161 , 102722. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ksciuk, J.; Kuhlemann, S.; Tierney, K.; Koberstein, A. Uncertainty in maritime ship routing and scheduling: A Literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2023 , 308 , 499–524. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jia, H.; Prakash, V.; Smith, T. Estimating vessel payloads in bulk shipping using AIS data. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 2019 , 11 , 25–40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, D.; Wu, L.X.; Wang, S.A.; Jia, H.Y.; Li, K.X. How big data enriches maritime research—A critical review of Automatic Identification System (AIS) data applications. Transp. Rev. 2019 , 39 , 755–773. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Li, G. A Deep Learning Framework for Baltic Dry Index Forecasting. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022 , 199 , 821–828. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, Y.C.; Wang, H.; Zou, D.X.; Fu, H.X. Ship roll prediction algorithm based on Bi-LSTM-TPA combined model. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021 , 9 , 387. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xie, H.T.; Jiang, X.Q.; Hu, X.; Wu, Z.T.; Wang, G.Q.; Xie, K. High-efficiency and low-energy ship recognition strategy based on spiking neural network in SAR images. Front. Neurorobotics 2022 , 16 , 970832. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Muñoz, D.U.; Ruiz-Aguilar, J.J.; González-Enrique, J.; Domínguez, I.J.T. A Deep Ensemble Neural Network Approach to Improve Predictions of Container Inspection Volume. In Proceedings of the 15th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (IWANN), Gran Canaria, Spain, 12–14 June 2019; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 11506, pp. 806–817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Velasco-Gallego, C.; Lazakis, I. Mar-RUL: A remaining useful life prediction approach for fault prognostics of marine machinery. Appl. Ocean Res. 2023 , 140 , 103735. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, X.; Zheng, K.; Wang, C.; Chen, J.; Qi, H. A novel deep reinforcement learning for POMDP-based autonomous ship collision decision-making. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023 , 1–15. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guo, X.X.; Zhang, X.T.; Lu, W.Y.; Tian, X.L.; Li, X. Real-time prediction of 6-DOF motions of a turret-moored FPSO in harsh sea state. Ocean Eng. 2022 , 265 , 112500. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, D.; Kim, T.; An, M.; Cho, Y.; Baek, Y.; IEEE. Edge AI-based early anomaly detection of LNG Carrier Main Engine systems. In Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference, Limerick, Ireland, 5–8 June 2023. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Theodoropoulos, P.; Spandonidis, C.C.; Giannopoulos, F.; Fassois, S. A Deep Learning-Based Fault Detection Model for Optimization of Shipping Operations and Enhancement of Maritime Safety. Sensors 2021 , 21 , 5658. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Huang, B.; Wu, B.; Barry, M. Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatio-temporal variation in house prices. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010 , 24 , 383–401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, W.; Xu, Y.; Streets, D.G.; Wang, C. How does decarbonization of the central heating industry affect employment? A spatiotemporal analysis from the perspective of urbanization. Energy Build. 2024 , 306 , 113912. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, D.; Li, X.; Wan, C.; Man, J. A novel hybrid deep-learning framework for medium-term container throughput forecasting: An application to China’s Guangzhou, Qingdao and Shanghai hub ports. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2024 , 26 , 44–73. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, B.; Fu, H. Multi-dimensional prediction method based on Bi-LSTMC for ship roll. Ocean Eng. 2021 , 242 , 110106. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Wang, M.; Guo, X.; She, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liang, M.; Chen, Z.S. Advancements in Deep Learning Techniques for Time Series Forecasting in Maritime Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Information 2024 , 15 , 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080507

Wang M, Guo X, She Y, Zhou Y, Liang M, Chen ZS. Advancements in Deep Learning Techniques for Time Series Forecasting in Maritime Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Information . 2024; 15(8):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080507

Wang, Meng, Xinyan Guo, Yanling She, Yang Zhou, Maohan Liang, and Zhong Shuo Chen. 2024. "Advancements in Deep Learning Techniques for Time Series Forecasting in Maritime Applications: A Comprehensive Review" Information 15, no. 8: 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080507

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals