quantitative research in agriculture example

• Search Menu
• Sign in through your institution
• Advance articles
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• Why Publish?
• About Research Evaluation
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

1. introduction, 2. analytical framework, 3. literature search, 5. discussion, 6. conclusion, acknowledgement.

• < Previous

Research impact assessment in agriculture—A review of approaches and impact areas

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Peter Weißhuhn, Katharina Helming, Johanna Ferretti, Research impact assessment in agriculture—A review of approaches and impact areas, Research Evaluation , Volume 27, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages 36–42, https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx034

• Permissions Icon Permissions

Research has a role to play in society’s endeavour for sustainable development. This is particularly true for agricultural research, since agriculture is at the nexus between numerous sustainable development goals. Yet, generally accepted methods for linking research outcomes to sustainability impacts are missing. We conducted a review of scientific literature to analyse how impacts of agricultural research were assessed and what types of impacts were covered. A total of 171 papers published between 2008 and 2016 were reviewed. Our analytical framework covered three categories: (1) the assessment level of research (policy, programme, organization, project, technology, or other); (2) the type of assessment method (conceptual, qualitative, or quantitative); and (3) the impact areas (economic, social, environmental, or sustainability). The analysis revealed that most papers (56%) addressed economic impacts, such as cost-effectiveness of research funding or macroeconomic effects. In total, 42% analysed social impacts, like food security or aspects of equity. Very few papers (2%) examined environmental impacts, such as climate effects or ecosystem change. Only one paper considered all three sustainability dimensions. We found a majority of papers assessing research impacts at the level of technologies, particularly for economic impacts. There was a tendency of preferring quantitative methods for economic impacts, and qualitative methods for social impacts. The most striking finding was the ‘blind eye’ towards environmental and sustainability implications in research impact assessments. Efforts have to be made to close this gap and to develop integrated research assessment approaches, such as those available for policy impact assessments.

Research has multiple impacts on society. In the light of the international discourse on grand societal challenges and sustainable development, the debate is reinforced about the role of research on economic growth, societal well-being, and environmental integrity ( 1 ). Research impact assessment (RIA) is a key instrument to exploring this role ( 2 ).

A number of countries have begun using RIA to base decisions for allocation of funding on it, and to justify the value of investments in research to taxpayers ( 3 ). The so-called scientometric assessments with a focus on bibliometric and exploitable results such as patents are the main basis for current RIA practices ( 4–6 ). However, neither academic values of science, based on the assumption of ‘knowledge as progress’, nor market values frameworks (‘profit as progress’) seem adequate for achieving and assessing broader public values ( 7 ). Those approaches do not explicitly acknowledge the contribution of research to solving societal challenges, although they are sufficient to measure scientific excellence ( 8 ) or academic impact.

RIA may however represent a vital element for designing socially responsible research processes with orientation towards responsibility for a sustainable development ( 9 , 10 ). In the past, RIAs occurred to focus on output indicators and on links between science and productivity while hardly exploring the wider societal impacts of science ( 11 ). RIA should entail the consideration of intended and non-intended, positive and negative, and long- and short-term impacts of research ( 12 ). Indeed, there has been a broadening of impact assessments to include, for example, cultural and social returns to society ( 13 ). RIA is conceptually and methodologically not yet sufficiently equipped to capture wider societal implications, though ( 14 ). This is due to the specific challenges associated with RIA, including inter alia unknown time lags between research processes and their impacts ( 15–17 ). Independent from their orientation, RIAs are likely to influence research policies for years to come ( 18 ).

Research on RIA and its potential to cover wider societal impacts has examined assessment methods and approaches in specific fields of research, and in specific research organizations. The European Science Foundation ( 19 ) and Guthrie et al. ( 20 ) provided overviews of a range of methods usable in assessment exercises. They discuss generic methods (e.g. economic analyses, surveys, and case studies) with view to their selection for RIAs. Methods need to fit the objectives of the assessment and the characteristics of the disciplines examined. Econometric methods consider the rate of return over investment ( 21 ), indicators for ‘productive interactions’ between the stakeholders try to capture the social impact of research ( 22 ), and case study-based approaches map the ‘public values’ of research programmes ( 8 , 23 ). No approach is generally favourable over another, while challenges exist in understanding which impact areas are relevant in what contexts. Penfield et al. ( 6 ) looked at the different methods and frameworks employed in assessment approaches worldwide, with a focus on the UK Research Excellence Framework. They argue that there is a need for RIA approaches based on types of impact rather than research discipline. They point to the need for tools and systems to assist in RIAs and highlight different types of information needed along the output-outcome-impact-chain to provide for a comprehensive assessment. In the field of public health research, a minority of RIAs exhibit a wider scope on impacts, and these studies highlight the relevance of case studies ( 24 ). However, case studies often rely on principal investigator interviews and/or peer review, not taking into account the views of end users. Evaluation practices in environment-related research organizations tend to focus on research uptake and management processes, but partially show a broader scope and longer-term outcomes. Establishing attribution of environmental research to different types of impacts was identified to be a key challenge ( 25 ). Other authors tested impact frameworks or impact patterns in disciplinary public research organizations. For example, Gaunand et al. ( 26 ) analysed an internal database of the French Agricultural research organization INRA with 1,048 entries to identify seven impact areas, with five going beyond traditional types of impacts (e.g. conservation of natural resources or scientific advice). Besides, for the case of agricultural research, no systematic review of RIA methods exists in the academic literature that would allow for an overview of available approaches covering different impact areas of research.

Against this background, the objective of this study was to review in how far RIAs of agricultural research capture wider societal implications. We understand agricultural research as being a prime example for the consideration of wider research impacts. This is because agriculture is a sector which has direct and severe implications for a range of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It has a strong practice orientation and is just beginning to develop a common understanding of innovation processes ( 27 ).

The analysis of the identified literature on agricultural RIA (for details, see next section ‘Literature search’) built on a framework from a preliminary study presented at the ImpAR Conference 2015 ( 28 ). It was based on three categories to explore the impact areas that were addressed and the design of RIA. In particular, the analytical framework consisted of: ( 1 ) the assessment level of research; ( 2 ) the type of assessment method; and ( 3 ) the impact areas covered. On the side, we additionally explored the time dimension of RIA, i.e. whether the assessment was done ex ante or ex post (see Fig. 1 ).

Analytical framework for the review of non-scientometric impact assessment literature of agricultural research.

Agricultural research and the ramifications following from that refer to different levels of assessment (or levels of evaluation, ( 29 )). We defined six assessment levels that can be the subject of a RIA: policy, programme, organization, project, technology, and other. The assessment level of the RIA is a relevant category, since it shapes the approach to the RIA (e.g. the impact chain of a research project differs to that at policy level). The assessment level was clearly stated in all of the analysed papers and in no case more than one assessment level was addressed. Articles were assigned to the policy level, if a certain public technology policy ( 30 ) or science policy, implemented by governments to directly or indirectly affect the conduct of science, was considered. Exemplary topics are research funding, transfer of research results to application, or contribution to economic development. Research programmes were understood as instruments that are adopted by government departments, or other organizational entities to implement research policies and fund research activities in a specific research field (e.g. programmes to promote research on a certain crop or cultivation technique). Articles dealing with the organizational level assess the impact of research activities of a specific research organization. The term research organization comprises public or private research institutes, associations, networks, or partnerships (e.g. the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and its research centres). A research project is the level at which research is actually carried out, e.g. as part of a research programme. The assessment of a research project would consider the impacts of the whole project, from planning through implementation to evaluation instead of focusing on a specific project output, like a certain agricultural innovation. The technology level was considered to be complementary to the other assessment levels of research and comprises studies with a strong focus on specific agricultural machinery or other agricultural innovation such as new crops or crop rotations, fertilizer applications, pest control, or tillage practices, irrespective of the agricultural system (e.g. smallholder or high-technology farming, or organic, integrated, or conventional farming). The category ‘other’ included one article addressing RIA at the level of individual researchers (see ( 31 )).

We categorized the impact areas along the three dimensions of sustainable development by drawing upon the European Commission’s impact assessment guidelines (cf. ( 32 )). The guidelines entail a list of 7 environmental impacts, such as natural resource use, climate change, or aspects of nature conservation; 12 social impacts, such as employment and working conditions, security, education, or aspects of equity; and 10 economic impacts, including business competitiveness, increased trade, and several macroeconomic aspects. The European Commission’s impact assessment guidelines were used as a classification framework because it is one of the most advanced impact assessment frameworks established until to date ( 33 ). In addition, we opened a separate category for those articles exploring joint impacts on the three sustainability dimensions. Few articles addressed impacts in two sustainability dimensions which we assigned to the dominating impact area.

To categorize the type of RIA method, we distinguished between conceptual, qualitative, and quantitative. Conceptual analyses include the development of frameworks or concepts for measuring impacts of agricultural research (e.g. tracking of innovation pathways or the identification of barriers and supporting factors for impact generation). Qualitative and quantitative methods were identified by the use of qualitative data or quantitative data, respectively (cf. ( 34–36 )). Qualitative data can be scaled nominally or ordinally. It is generated by interviews, questionnaires, surveys or choice experiments to gauge stakeholder attitudes to new technologies, their willingness to pay, and their preference for adoption measures. The generation of quantitative data involves a numeric measurement in a standardized way. Such data are on a metric scale and are often used for modelling. The used categorization is rather simple. We assigned approaches which employed mixed-method approaches according to their dominant method. We preferred this over more sophisticated typologies to achieve a high level of abstraction and because the focus of our analysis was on impact areas rather than methods. However, to show consistencies with existing typologies of impact assessment methods ( 19 , 37 ), we provide an overview of the categorization chosen and give examples of the most relevant types of methods.

To additionally explore the approach of the assessment ( 38 ), the dimensions ex ante and ex post were identified. The two approaches are complementary: whereas ex ante impact assessments are usually conducted for strategic and planning purposes to set priorities, ex post impact assessments serve as accountability validation and control against a baseline. The studies in our sample that employed an ex ante approach to RIA usually made this explicit, while in the majority of ex post impact assessments, this was indicated rather implicitly.

This study was performed as a literature review based on Thomson Reuters Web of Science TM Core Collection, indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Exp) and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). The motivation for restricting the analysis to articles from ISI-listed journals was to stay within the boundaries of internationally accepted scientific quality management and worldwide access. The advantages of a search based on Elsevier’s Scopus ® (more journals and alternative publications, and more articles from social and health science covered) would not apply for this literature review, with regard to the drawbacks of an index system based on abstracts instead of citation indexes, which is not as transparent as the Core Collection regarding the database definable by the user. We selected the years of 2008 to mid-2016 for the analysis (numbers last updated on 2 June 2016) . First, because most performance-based funding systems have been introduced since 2000, allowing sufficient time for the RIA approaches to evolve and literature to be published. Secondly, in 2008 two key publications on RIA of agricultural research triggered the topic: Kelley, et al. ( 38 ) published the lessons learned from the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of CGIAR; Watts, et al. ( 39 ) summarized several central pitfalls of impact assessment concerning agricultural research. We took these publications as a starting point for the literature search. We searched in TOPIC and therefore, the terms had to appear in the title, abstract, author keywords, or keywords plus ® . The search query 1 filtered for agricultural research in relation to research impact. To cover similar expressions, we used science, ‘R&D’, and innovation interchangeably with research, and we searched for assessment, evaluation, criteria, benefit, adoption, or adaptation of research.

We combined the TOPIC search with a less strict search query 2 in TITLE using the same groups of terms, as these searches contained approximately two-thirds non-overlapping papers. Together they consisted of 315 papers. Of these, we reviewed 282 after excluding all document types other than articles and reviews (19 papers were not peer-reviewed journal articles) and all papers not written in English language (14 papers). After going through them, 171 proved to be topic-relevant and were included in the analysis.

Analysis matrix showing the number of reviewed articles, each categorized to an assessment level and an impact area (social, economic, environmental, or all three (sustainability)). Additionally, the type of analytical method (conceptual, quantitative, and qualitative) is itemized

In the agricultural RIA, the core assessment level of the reviewed articles was technology (39%), while the other levels were almost equally represented (with the exception of ‘other’). Generally, most papers (56%) addressed economic research impacts, closely followed by social research impacts (42%); however, only three papers (2%) addressed environmental research impacts and only 1 of 171 papers addressed all three dimensions of sustainable development. Assessments at the level of research policy slightly emphasized social impacts over economic impacts (18 papers, or 58%), whereas assessments at the level of technology clearly focused primarily on economic impacts (46 papers, or 68%).

The methods used for agricultural RIA showed no preference for one method type (see Table 1 ). Approximately 31% of the papers assessed research impacts quantitatively, whereas 37% used qualitative methods. Conceptual considerations on research impact were applied by 32% of the studies. A noticeable high number of qualitative studies were conducted to assess social impacts. At the evaluation level of research policy and research programmes, we found a focus on quantitative methods, if economic impacts were assessed.

Overview on type of methods used for agricultural RIA

a Mix of conceptual and qualitative methods.

b Mix of conceptual, qualitative, and quantitative methods.

Additionally, 37 ex ante studies, compared to 134 ex post studies, revealed that the latter clearly dominated, but no robust relation to any other investigated characteristic was found. Of the three environmental impact studies, none assessed ex ante , while the one study exploring sustainability impacts did. The share of ex ante assessments regarding social impacts was very similar to those regarding economic impacts. Within the assessment levels of research (excluding ‘others’ with only one paper), no notable difference between the shares of ex ante assessments occurred as they ranged between 13 and 28%.

The most relevant outcome of the review analysis was that only 3 of the 171 papers focus on the environmental impacts of agricultural research. This seems surprising because agriculture is dependent on an intact environment. However, this finding is supported by two recent reviews: one from Bennett, et al. ( 40 ) and one from Maredia and Raitzer ( 41 ). Both note that not only international agricultural research in general but also research on natural resource management shows a lack regarding large-scale assessments of environmental impacts. The CGIAR also recognized the necessity to deepen the understanding of the environmental impacts of its work because RIAs had largely ignored environmental benefits ( 42 ).

A few papers explicitly include environmental impacts of research in addition to their main focus. Raitzer and Maredia ( 43 ) address water depletion, greenhouse gas emissions, and landscape effects; however, their overall focus is on poverty reduction. Ajayi et al. ( 44 ) report the improvement of soil physical properties and soil biodiversity from introducing fertilizer trees but predominantly measure economic and social effects. Cavallo, et al. ( 45 ) investigate users’ attitudes towards the environmental impact of agricultural tractors (considered as technological innovation) but do not measure the environmental impact. Briones, et al. ( 46 ) configure an environmental ‘modification’ of economic surplus analysis, but they do not prioritize environmental impacts.

Of course, the environmental impacts of agricultural practices were the topic of many studies in recent decades, such as Kyllmar, et al. ( 47 ), Skinner, et al. ( 48 ), Van der Werf and Petit ( 49 ), among many others. However, we found very little evidence for the impact of agricultural research on the environment. A study on environmental management systems that examined technology adoption rates though not the environmental impacts is exemplarily for this ( 50 ). One possible explanation is based on the observation made by Morris, et al. ( 51 ) and Watts, et al. ( 39 ). They see impact assessments tending to accentuate the success stories because studies are often commissioned strategically as to demonstrate a certain outcome. This would mean to avoid carving out negative environmental impacts that conflict with, when indicated, the positive economic or societal impacts of the assessed research activity. In analogy to policy impact assessments, this points to the need of incentives to equally explore intended and unintended, expected and non-expected impacts from scratch ( 52 ). From those tasked with an RIA, this again requires an open attitude in ‘doing RIA’ and towards the findings of their RIA.

Another possible explanation was given by Bennett, et al. ( 40 ): a lack of skills in ecology or environmental economics to cope with the technically complex and data-intensive integration of environmental impacts. Although such a lack of skills or data could also apply to social and economic impacts, continuous monitoring of environmental data related to agricultural practices is particularly scarce. A third possible explanation is a conceptual oversight, as environmental impacts may be thought to be covered by the plenty of environmental impact assessments of agricultural activities itself.

The impression of a ‘blind eye’ on the environment in agricultural RIA may change when publications beyond Web of Science TM Core Collection are considered ( 53 ) or sources other than peer-reviewed journal articles are analysed (e.g. reports; conference proceedings). See, for example, Kelley, et al. ( 38 ), Maredia and Pingali ( 54 ), or FAO ( 55 ). Additionally, scientific publications of the highest quality standard (indicated by reviews and articles being listed in the Web of Science TM Core Collection) seem to not yet reflect experiences and advancements from assessment applications on research and innovation policy that usually include the environmental impact ( 56 ).

Since their beginnings, RIAs have begun to move away from narrow exercises concerned with economic impacts ( 11 ) and expanded their scope to social impacts. However, we only found one sustainability approach in our review that would cover all three impact areas of agricultural research (see ( 57 )). In contrast, progressive approaches to policy impact assessment largely attempt to cover the full range of environmental, social, and economic impacts of policy ( 33 , 58 ). RIAs may learn from them.

Additionally, the focus of agricultural research on technological innovation seems evident. Although the word innovation is sometimes still used for new technology (as in ‘diffusion of innovations’), it is increasingly used for the process of technical and institutional change at the farm level and higher levels of impact. Technology production increasingly is embedded in innovation systems ( 59 ).

The review revealed a diversity of methods (see Table 2 ) applied in impact assessments of agricultural research. In the early phases of RIA, the methods drawn from agricultural economics were considered as good standard for an impact assessment of international agricultural research ( 39 ). However, quantitative methods most often address economic impacts. In addition, the reliability of assessments based on econometric models is often disputed because of strong relationships between modelling assumptions and respective results.

Regarding environmental (or sustainability) impacts of agricultural research, the portfolio of assessment methods could be extended by learning from RIAs in other impact areas. In our literature sample, only review, framework development (e.g. key barrier typologies, environmental costing, or payments for ecosystem services), life-cycle assessment, and semi-structured interviews were used for environmental impacts of agricultural research.

In total, 42 of the 171 analysed papers assessed the impact of participatory research. A co-management of public research acknowledges the influence of the surrounding ecological, social, and political system and allows different types of stakeholder knowledge to shape innovation ( 60 ). Schut, et al. ( 36 ) conceptualize an agricultural innovation support system, which considers multi-stakeholder dynamics next to multilevel interactions within the agricultural system and multiple dimensions of the agricultural problem. Another type of participation in RIAs is the involvement of stakeholders to the evaluation process. A comparatively low number of six papers considered participatory evaluation of research impact, of them three in combination with impact assessment of participatory research.

Approximately 22% of the articles in our sample on agricultural research reported that they conducted their assessments ex ante , but most studies were ex post assessments. Watts, et al. ( 39 ) considered ex ante impact assessment to be more instructive than ex post assessment because it can directly guide the design of research towards maximizing beneficial impacts. This is particularly true when an ex ante assessment is conducted as a comparative assessment comprising a set of alternative options ( 61 ).

Many authors of the studies analysed were not explicit about the time frames considered in their ex post studies. The potential latency of impacts from research points to the need for ex post (and ex ante) studies to account for and analyse longer time periods, either considering ‘decades’ ( 62 , 63 ) or a lag distribution covering up to 50 years, with a peak approximately in the middle of the impact period ( 64 ). This finding is in line with the perspective of impact assessments as an ongoing process throughout a project’s life cycle and not as a one-off process at the end ( 51 ). Nevertheless, ex post assessments are an important component of a comprehensive evaluation package, which includes ex ante impact assessment, impact pathway analysis, programme peer reviews, performance monitoring and evaluation, and process evaluations, among others ( 38 ).

RIA is conceptually and methodologically not yet sufficiently equipped to capture wider societal implications, though ( 14 ). This is due to the specific challenges associated with RIA, including inter alia unknown time lags between research processes and their impacts ( 15–17 ). Independent from their orientation, RIAs are likely to influence research policies for years to come ( 18 ).

However, in the cases in which a RIA is carried out, an increase in the positive impacts (or avoidance of negative impacts) of agricultural research does not follow automatically. Lilja and Dixon ( 65 ) state the following methodological reasons for the missing impact of impact studies: no accountability with internal learning, no developed scaling out, the overlap of monitoring and evaluation and impact assessment, the intrinsic nature of functional and empowering farmer participation, the persistent lack of widespread attention to gender, and the operational and political complexity of multi-stakeholder impact assessment. In contrast, a desired impact of research could be reached or boosted by specific measures without making an impact assessment at all. Kristjanson, et al. ( 66 ), for example, proposed seven framework conditions for agricultural research to bridge the gap between scientific knowledge and action towards sustainable development. RIA should develop into process-oriented evaluations, in contrast to outcome-oriented evaluation ( 67 ), for addressing the intended kind of impacts, the scope of assessment, and for choosing the appropriate assessment method ( 19 ).

This review aimed at providing an overview of impact assessment activities reported in academic agricultural literature with regard to their coverage of impact areas and type of assessment method used. We found a remarkable body of non-scientometric RIA at all evaluation levels of agricultural research but a major interest in economic impacts of new agricultural technologies. These are closely followed by an interest in social impacts at multiple assessments levels that usually focus on food security and poverty reduction and rely slightly more on qualitative assessment methods. In contrast, the assessment of the environmental impacts of agricultural research or comprehensive sustainability assessments was exceptionally limited. They may have been systematically overlooked in the past, for the reason of expected negative results, thought to be covered by other impact studies or methodological challenges. RIA could learn from user-oriented policy impact assessments that usually include environmental impacts. Frameworks for RIA should avoid narrowing the assessment focus and instead considering intended and unintended impacts in several impact areas equally. It seems fruitful to invest in assessment teams’ environmental analytic skills and to expand several of the already developed methods for economic or social impact to the environmental impacts. Only then, the complex and comprehensive contribution of agricultural research to sustainable development can be revealed.

The authors would like to thank Jana Rumler and Claus Dalchow for their support in the Web of Science analysis and Melanie Gutschker for her support in the quantitative literature analysis.

This work was supported by the project LIAISE (Linking Impact Assessment to Sustainability Expertise, www.liaisenoe.eu ), which was funded by Framework Programme 7 of the European Commission and co-funded by the Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research. The research was further inspired and supported by funding from the ‘Guidelines for Sustainability Management’ project for non-university research institutes in Germany (‘Leitfaden Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement’, BMBF grant 311 number 13NKE003A).

Seidl R. et al.  ( 2013 ) ‘ Science with Society in the Anthropocene ’, Ambio , 42 / 1 : 5 – 12 .

Google Scholar

OECD . ( 2010 ) ‘Performance-Based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions’, Workshop Proceedings ' 2010. Paris : Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development .

Hicks D. ( 2012 ) ‘ Performance-based University Research Funding Systems ’, Research Policy , 41 / 2 : 251 – 61 .

Martin B. R. ( 1996 ) ‘ The Use of Multiple Indicators in the Assessment of Basic Research ’, Scientometrics , 36 / 3 : 343 – 62 .

Moed H. F. , Halevi G. ( 2015 ) ‘ Multidimensional Assessment of Scholarly Research Impact ’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology , 66 : 1988 – 2002 .

Penfield T. et al.  ( 2014 ) ‘ Assessment, Evaluations, and Definitions of Research Impact: A Review ’, Research Evaluation , 23 / 1 : 21 – 32 .

Meyer R. ( 2011 ) ‘ The Public Values Failures of Climate Science in the US ’, Minerva , 49 / 1 : 47 – 70 .

Bozeman B. , Sarewitz D. ( 2011 ) ‘ Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation ’, Minerva , 49 / 1 : 1 – 23 .

Helming K. et al.  ( 2016 ) ‘ Forschen für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Kriterien für gesellschaftlich verantwortliche Forschungsprozesse (Research for Sustainable Development. Criteria for Socially Responsible Research Processes) ’, GAIA , 25 / 3 : 161 – 5 .

Cagnin C. , Amanatidou E. , Keenan M. ( 2012 ) ‘ Orienting European Innovation Systems Towards Grand Challenges and the Roles that FTA Can Play ’, Science and Public Policy , 39 / 2 : 140 – 52 .

Godin B. , Doré C. ( 2004 ) Measuring the Impacts of Science: Beyond the Economic Dimension . Montréal (Québec) : Centre Urbanisation Culture Société (INRS) .

Ferretti J. et al.  ( 2016 ) Reflexionsrahmen für Forschen in gesellschaftlicher Verantwortung. (Framework for Reflecting Research in Societal Responsibility) . Berlin : Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) .

Jacobsson S. , Vico E. P. , Hellsmark H. ( 2014 ) ‘ The Many Ways of Academic Researchers: How is Science Made Useful? ’, Science and Public Policy , 41 : 641 – 57 .

Levitt R. et al.  ( 2010 ) Assessing the Impact of Arts and Humanities Research at the University of Cambridge . Cambridge : University of Cambridge .

Donovan C. ( 2011 ) ‘ State of the Art in Assessing Research Impact: Introduction to a Special Issue ’, Research Evaluation , 20 / 3 : 175 – 9 .

Ekboir J. ( 2003 ) ‘ Why Impact Analysis Should not be Used for Research Evaluation and what the Alternatives Are ’, Agricultural Systems , 78 / 2 : 166 – 84 .

Morton S. ( 2015 ) ‘ Progressing Research Impact Assessment: A ‘Contributions’ Approach ’, Research Evaluation , 24 : 405 – 19 .

Reinhardt A. ( 2013 ) ‘Different Pathways to Impact? “Impact” and Research Fund Allocation in Selected European Countries’, in Dean A. , Wykes M. , Stevens H. (eds) 7 Essays on Impact. DESCRIBE Project Report for Jisc , pp. 88 – 101 . Exeter : University of Exeter .

Google Preview

European Science Foundation . ( 2012 ) The Challenges of Impact Assessment. Working Group 2: Impact Assessment . Strasbourg : European Science Foundation .

Guthrie S. et al.  ( 2013 ) Measuring Research. A Guide to Research Evaluation Frameworks and Tools . Cambridge : RAND Corporation .

Alston J. M. et al.  ( 2011 ) ‘ The Economic Returns to US Public Agricultural Research ’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 93 / 5 : 1257 – 77 .

Spaapen J. , Drooge L. ( 2011 ) ‘ Introducing' Productive Interactions' in Social Impact Assessment ’, Research Evaluation , 20 / 3 : 211 – 18 .

Bozeman B. ( 2003 ) Public Value Mapping of Science Outcomes: Theory and Method . Washington : Center for Science, Policy and Outcomes .

Milat A. J. , Bauman A. E. , Redman S. ( 2015 ) ‘ A Narrative Review of Research Impact Assessment Models and Methods ’, Health Research Policy and Systems , 13 / 1 : 18.

Bell S. , Shaw B. , Boaz A. ( 2011 ) ‘ Real-world Approaches to Assessing the Impact of Environmental Research on Policy ’, Research Evaluation , 20 / 3 : 227 – 37 .

Gaunand A. et al.  ( 2015 ) ‘ How Does Public Agricultural Research Impact Society? A Characterization of Various Patterns ’, Research Policy , 44 / 4 : 849 – 61 .

Bokelmann W. et al.  ( 2012 ) Sector Study on the Analysis of the Innovation of German Agriculture (Sektorstudie zur Untersuchung des Innovationssystems der deutschen Landwirtschaft) . Berlin : Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) .

Weißhuhn P. , Helming K. ( 2015 ) ‘Methods for Assessing the Non-Scientometric Impacts of Agricultural Research: A Review’. In ImpAR Conference 2015: Impacts of Agricultural Research-Towards an Approach of Societal V alues. Paris: INRA.

European Science Foundation . ( 2009 ) Evaluation in National Research Funding Agencies: Approaches, Experiences and Case Studies . Strasbourg : European Science Foundation .

Bozeman B. ( 2000 ) ‘ Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory ’, Research Policy , 29 / 4 : 627 – 55 .

Hummer K. E. , Hancock J. F. ( 2015 ) ‘ Vavilovian Centers of Plant Diversity: Implications and Impacts ’, Hortscience , 50 / 6 : 780 – 3 .

EC . ( 2015 ) Better Regulation “Toolbox” . Brussels : European Commission .

Helming K. et al.  ( 2013 ) ‘ Mainstreaming Ecosystem Services in European Policy Impact Assessment ’, Ecosystem Services in EIA and SEA , 40 : 82 – 7 .

Thapa D. B. et al.  ( 2009 ) ‘ Identifying Superior Wheat Cultivars in Participatory Research on Resource Poor Farms ’, Field Crops Research , 112 / 2–3 : 124 – 30 .

Holdsworth M. et al.  ( 2015 ) ‘ African Stakeholders' Views of Research Options to Improve Nutritional Status in Sub-Saharan Africa ’, Health Policy and Planning , 30 / 7 : 863 – 74 .

Schut M. et al.  ( 2015 ) ‘ RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A Diagnostic Tool for Integrated Analysis of Complex Problems and Innovation Capacity ’, Agricultural Systems , 132 : 1 – 11 .

Jones M. M. , Grant J. ( 2013 ) ’Making the Grade: Methodologies for assessing and evidencing research impact’. In Dean A. , Wykes M. , Stevens H. (eds) 7 Essays on Impact. DESCRIBE Project Report for Jisc , pp. 25 – 43 . Exeter : University of Exeter .

Kelley T. , Ryan J. , Gregersen H. ( 2008 ) ‘ Enhancing Ex Post Impact Assessment of Agricultural Research: The CGIAR Experience ’, Research Evaluation , 17 / 3 : 201 – 12 .

Watts J. et al.  ( 2008 ) ‘ Transforming Impact Assessment: Beginning the Quiet Revolution of Institutional Learning and Change ’, Experimental Agriculture , 44 / 1 : 21 – 35 .

Bennett J. W. , Kelley T. G. , Maredia M. K. ( 2012 ) ‘ Integration of Environmental Impacts Into Ex-post Assessments of International Agricultural Research: Conceptual Issues, Applications, and the Way Forward ’, Research Evaluation , 21 / 3 : 216 – 28 .

Maredia M. K. , Raitzer D. A. ( 2012 ) ‘ Review and Analysis of Documented Patterns of Agricultural Research Impacts in Southeast Asia ’, Agricultural Systems , 106 / 1 : 46 – 58 .

Renkow M. , Byerlee D. ( 2010 ) ‘ The Impacts of CGIAR Research: A Review of Recent Evidence ’, Food Policy , 35 / 5 : 391 – 402 .

Raitzer D. A. , Maredia M. K. ( 2012 ) ‘ Analysis of Agricultural Research Investment Priorities for Sustainable Poverty Reduction in Southeast Asia ’, Food Policy , 37 / 4 : 412 – 26 .

Ajayi O. C. et al.  ( 2011 ) ‘ Agricultural Success from Africa: The Case of Fertilizer Tree Systems in Southern Africa (Malawi, Tanzania, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe) ’, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability , 9 / 1 : 129 – 36 .

Cavallo E. et al.  ( 2014 ) ‘ Strategic Management Implications for the Adoption of Technological Innovations in Agricultural Tractor: The Role of Scale Factors and Environmental Attitude ’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management , 26 / 7 : 765 – 79 .

Briones R. M. et al.  ( 2008 ) ‘ Priority Setting for Research on Aquatic Resources: An Application of Modified Economic Surplus Analysis to Natural Resource Systems ’, Agricultural Economics , 39 / 2 : 231 – 43 .

Kyllmar K. et al.  ( 2014 ) ‘ Small Agricultural Monitoring Catchments in Sweden Representing Environmental Impact ’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment , 198 : 25 – 35 .

Skinner J. et al.  ( 1997 ) ‘ An Overview of the Environmental Impact of Agriculture in the UK ’, Journal of Environmental Management , 50 / 2 : 111 – 28 .

Van der Werf H. M. , Petit J. ( 2002 ) ‘ Evaluation of the Environmental Impact of Agriculture at the Farm Level: A Comparison and Analysis of 12 Indicator-based Methods ’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment , 93 / 1 : 131 – 45 .

Carruthers G. , Vanclay F. ( 2012 ) ‘ The Intrinsic Features of Environmental Management Systems that Facilitate Adoption and Encourage Innovation in Primary Industries ’, Journal of Environmental Management , 110 : 125 – 34 .

Morris M. et al.  ( 2003 ) ‘ Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Research: An Overview ’, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture , 42 / 2 : 127 – 48 .

Podhora A. et al.  ( 2013 ) ‘ The Policy-Relevancy of Impact Assessment Tools: Evaluating Nine Years of European Research Funding ’, Environmental Science and Policy , 31 : 85 – 95 .

Rodrigues G. S. , de Almeida Buschinelli C. C. , Dias Avila A. F. ( 2010 ) ‘ An Environmental Impact Assessment System for Agricultural Research and Development II: Institutional Learning Experience at Embrapa ’, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation , 5 / 4 : 38 – 56 .

Maredia M. , Pingali P. ( 2001 ) Environmental Impacts of Productivity-Enhancing Crop Research: A Critical Review . Durban : CGIAR .

FAO . ( 2011 ) ‘ Environmental Impact Assessment', Guideline for FAO field projects . Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations .

Miedzinski M. et al.  ( 2013 ) Assessing Environmental Impacts of Research and Innovation Policy .

Ervin D. E. , Glenna L. L. , Jussaume R. A. ( 2011 ) ‘ The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability ’, Sustainability , 3 / 6 : 847 – 74 .

Jacob K. et al.  ( 2012 ) ‘Sustainability in Impact Assessments - A Review of Impact Assessment Systems in selected OECD countries and the European Commission’ . Paris : Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development .

Röling N. ( 2009 ) ‘ Pathways for Impact: Scientists' Different Perspectives on Agricultural Innovation ’, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability , 7 / 2 : 83 – 94 .

Dentoni D. , Klerkx L. ( 2015 ) ‘ Co-managing Public Research in Australian Fisheries Through Convergence-Divergence Processes ’, Marine Policy , 60 : 259 – 71 .

Helming K. et al.  ( 2011 ) ‘ Ex Ante Impact Assessment of Policies Affecting Land Use, Part A: Analytical Framework ’, Ecology and Society , 16 / 1 : 27 .

Stads G. J. , Beintema N. ( 2015 ) ‘ Agricultural R&D Expenditure in Africa: An Analysis of Growth and Volatility ’, European Journal of Development Research , 27 / 3 : 391 – 406 .

Raitzer D. A. , Kelley T. G. ( 2008 ) ‘ Benefit-cost Meta-analysis of Investment in the International Agricultural Research Centers of the CGIAR ’, Agricultural Systems , 96 / 1-3 : 108 – 23 .

Andersen M. A. ( 2015 ) ‘ Public Investment in US Agricultural R&D and the Economic Benefits ’, Food Policy , 51 : 38 – 43 .

Lilja N. , Dixon J. ( 2008 ) ‘ Responding to the Challenges of Impact Assessment of Participatory Research and Gender Analysis ’, Experimental Agriculture , 44 / 1 : 3 – 19 .

Kristjanson P. et al.  ( 2009 ) ‘ Linking International Agricultural Research Knowledge with Action for Sustainable Development ’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America , 106 / 13 : 5047 – 52 .

Upton S. , Vallance P. , Goddard J. ( 2014 ) ‘ From Outcomes to Process: Evidence for a New Approach to Research Impact Assessment ’, Research Evaluation , 23 : 352 – 65 .

The exact TOPIC query was: agricult* NEAR/1 (research* OR *scien* OR "R&D" OR innovati*) AND (research* OR *scien* OR "R&D" OR innovati*) NEAR/2 (impact* OR assess* OR evaluat* OR criteria* OR benefit* OR adoption* OR adaptation*)

The exact TITLE query was: agricult* AND (research* OR *scien* OR "R&D" OR innovati*) AND (impact* OR assess* OR evaluat* OR criteria* OR benefit* OR adoption* OR adaptation*)

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1471-5449
• Print ISSN 0958-2029
• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Agricultural Research: Applications and Future Orientations

• Reference work entry
• First Online: 01 January 2020
• Cite this reference work entry

• Naser Valizadeh Ph.D. Student 6 &
• Masoud Bijani Assistant Professor 7  

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

124 Accesses

2 Citations

Agricultural research methodology

Agricultural research can be broadly defined as any research activity aimed at improving productivity and quality of crops by their genetic improvement, better plant protection, irrigation, storage methods, farm mechanization, efficient marketing, and a better management of resources (Loebenstein and Thottappilly 2007 ).

Introduction

The objective of this document is to provide a tool to understand aspects and future orientations of agricultural research. It begins with an overview of the concept and/or definition of agricultural research. It then focuses on the role of agricultural research in achieving the goals of 2030 Agenda, different types of agricultural researched, systemic research methodology in agriculture, and finally different kinds of use for agricultural research.

The Concept and Definition of Agricultural Research

Finding answers for questions about unknown phenomena in the agricultural area is the key to agricultural...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Aboelela SW, Larson E, Bakken S, Carrasquillo O, Formicola A, Glied SA, Haas J, Gebbie KM (2007) Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Serv Res 42(1–1):329–346

Article   Google Scholar  

Alrøe HF, Kristensen ES (2002) Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: rethinking the role of values in science. Agric Hum Values 19(1):3–23

Anastasios M, Koutsouris A, Konstadinos M (2010) Information and communication technologies as agricultural extension tools: a survey among farmers in West Macedonia, Greece. J Agric Educ Ext 16(3):249–263

Bijani M, Ghazani E, Valizadeh N, Fallah Haghighi N (2017) Pro-environmental analysis of farmers’ concerns and behaviors towards soil conservation in central district of Sari County, Iran. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 5(1):43–49

Google Scholar  

Borg WR, Gall MD, Gall JP (1963) Educational research: an introduction. Longmans, New York & London p 704

Damalas CA, Georgiou EB, Theodorou MG (2006) Pesticide use and safety practices among Greek tobacco farmers: a survey. Int J Environ Health Res 16(5):339–348

Delavar A (2017) Research methods in psychology and educational sciences. Virayesh Publishing, Tehran. In Persian

Ebrahimi Sarcheshmeh E, Bijani M, Sadighi H (2018) Adoption behavior towards the use of nuclear technology in agriculture: A causal analysis. Technol Soc 54(2018):175–182

Fallah Haghighi N, Bijani M, Parhizkar M (2019) An analysis of major social obstacles affecting human resource development in Iran. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 29(3):372–388

Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D (1985) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Chang 33(2):255–298

Fleischer DN, Christie CA (2009) Evaluation use: results from a survey of US American Evaluation Association members. Am J Eval 30(2):158–175

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2017) Food and agriculture – driving action across the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/a-i7454e.pdf

Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London

Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In NK Denzin, YS Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research, pp 105–117. London: Sage

Habashiani R (2011) Qanat: a sustainable groundwater supply system. Master’s thesis, School of Arts and Social Science, James Cook University, Queensland

Habibpour Gatabi K, Safari Shali R (2013) Comprehensive manual for using SPSS in survey researches. Looyeh Publications, Tehran

Henry GT, Mark MM (2003) Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. N Dir Eval 97:69–80

Iman MT (2009) Paradigmatic foundations of quantitative and qualitative research methods in humanities. Research Institute of Hawzah and University, Qom. In Persian

Khoursandi-Taskouh A (2009) Typological diversity in interdisciplinary education and research. J Interdiscip Stud Humanit 1(4):57–83

Lekka-Kowalik A (2010) Why science cannot be value-free. Sci Eng Ethics 16(1):33–41

Lockheed ME, Jamison T, Lau LJ (1980) Farmer education and farm efficiency: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Chang 29(1):37–76

Loebenstein G, Thottappilly G (2007) The mission of agricultural research. In: Loebenstein G, Thottappilly G (eds) Agricultural research management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–7

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Madani K (2014) Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? J Environ Stud Sci 4(4):315–328

Majidi F, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2017) Pathology of scientific articles publishing in the field of agriculture as perceived by faculty members and Ph. D. students (The case of colleges of agriculture at Public Universities, Iran). J Agric Sci Technol 19:1469–1484

Malekian A, Hayati D, Aarts N (2017) Conceptualizations of water security in the agricultural sector: perceptions, practices, and paradigms. J Hydrol 544:224–232

Mennatizadeh M, Zamani G (2016) Water ethics: theoretical analysis of moral development theories. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci 6:413–428

Mohammadi-Mehr S, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2018) Factors affecting the aesthetic behavior of villagers towards the natural environment: The case of Kermanshah province, Iran. J Agric Sci Technol 20(7):1353–1367

Morales FJ (2007) The mission and evolution of international agricultural research in developing countries. In: Loebenstein G, Thottappilly G (eds) Agricultural research management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 9–36

Patton MQ (2008) Utilization focused evaluation, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Popa F, Guillermin M, Dedeurwaerdere T (2015) A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures 65:45–56

Raeisi AA, Bijani M, Chizari M (2018) The mediating role of environmental emotions in transition from knowledge to sustainable behavior toward exploit groundwater resources in Iran’s agriculture. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 6(2):143–152

Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1991) Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hil, Boston

Schensul SL, Schensul JJ, LeCompte MD (2012) Initiating ethnographic research: a mixed methods approach, vol 2. AltaMira Press, London

Shadish WR, Cook TD, Leviton LC (1991) Foundations of program evaluation: theories of practice. Sage, Newbury Park

Shahvali M (2013) Explanation of transcendental innovation system for sustainability. In: The proceedings of the Iranian and Islamic pattern of development, pp 1245–1267

Shahvali M, Amiri Ardakani M (2011) Research methodology for agricultural indigenous knowledge. Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Tehran

Shiri S, Bijani M, Chaharsoughi Amin H, Noori H, Soleymanifard A (2011) Effectiveness evaluation of the axial plan of wheat from expert supervisors’ view in Ilam province. World Appl Sci J 14(11):1724–1729

Valizadeh N, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2016) Pro-environmental analysis of farmers’ participatory behavior toward conservation of surface water resources in southern sector of Urmia Lake’s catchment area. Iran Agric Ext Educ J 11(2):183–201. In Persian

Valizadeh N, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2018a) Farmers’ active participation in water conservation: insights from a survey among farmers in Southern Regions of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. J Agric Sci Technol 20(5):895–910

Valizadeh N, Bijani M, Abbasi E, Ganguli S (2018b) The role of time perspective in predicting Iranian farmers’ participatory-based water conservation attitude and behavior. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 28:992

Weiss CH, Murphy-Graham E, Birkeland S (2005) An alternate route to policy influence: how evaluations affect D.A.R.E. Am J Eval 26(1):12–30

Yazdanpanah M, Hayati D, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Zamani GHH (2014) Understanding farmers’ intention and behavior regarding water conservation in the Middle-East and North Africa: a case study in Iran. J Environ Manag 135:63–72

Zamani GHH (2016) Human liability theory: ethical approach towards agriculture and environment. Iran Agric Ext Educ J 12(1):149–163

Zanoli R, Krell R (1999) Research methodologies in organic farming. Proceedings. REU technical series. FAO, Rome

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Naser Valizadeh Ph.D. Student

Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran

Masoud Bijani Assistant Professor

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Bijani Assistant Professor .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

European School of Sustainability Science and Research, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

Walter Leal Filho

Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Anabela Marisa Azul

Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, The University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Brazil

Luciana Brandli

Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey

Pinar Gökçin Özuyar

International Centre for Thriving, University of Chester, Chester, UK

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M. (2020). Agricultural Research: Applications and Future Orientations. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P.G., Wall, T. (eds) Zero Hunger. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95675-6_5

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95675-6_5

Published : 04 June 2020

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-95674-9

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-95675-6

eBook Packages : Earth and Environmental Science Reference Module Physical and Materials Science Reference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Agriculture Research

Ai generator.

Industrial areas are associated with concentrated pools of personal and economic opportunities. However, urban imagery is misconstrued as the sole concretization of progress. We are abandoning agricultural lands in search of greener pastures in the cement and steel wonderland. We are converting fertile fields into urban projects, gambling our food source, for one. To mitigate future more devastating losses, academic institutes have poured hard work into writing researches in agriculture.

Agriculture research can be either or both qualitative and quantitative research . Agricultural science is not a new idea. It started roughly around the time when man learned he could grow his food. The concept was simple: “Plant A is edible, Plant B is not. Let’s plant more of A.” As humans practiced growing plants and animals for general consumption, we learned better ways to generate a better yield. Soon, we developed tools for the trade: chemicals, machines, and their derivatives that make farming more systematic and efficient.

Why We Research

More than 20,000 years since man’s first attempt at cultivation , yet a lot about agriculture is still an open question. Farming is not just about sowing seeds and reaping fruits. Complex processes occur between the planting and harvesting periods. In the past, farmers rely on trial-and-error methods to find out what works for them. Not having a strong and reliable foundation for our next move could mean our families would be hungry indefinitely. Just producing food wasn’t enough.

Food security

The marriage of agriculture and education allowed better crop management. We increased the yield and nutritional value of plants while making them grow healthier. We saw development in farming methods and innovations based on research and scientific investigations. An in-depth understanding of plant biology allowed for improved food production and reduced damages from pestilence and acts of God.

It is in the genes

Rice is one of the primary agricultural commodities in the world. Rice flowers bloom at a specific period in the morning, at times for two hours, for a few days. In that short time, the plant must be able to pollinate successfully. However, favorable weather will not discount the impact of pests and infections on the plant’s normal life cycle. One of the things that agricultural research scientists in the lab have worked on is tinkering with the genes of different rice varieties to extend or shorten the flowering time and making the plant resistant to fatal infestations and conditions.

Bigger is better

Another feat in the history of agriculture is farmers transforming corn into what it is today. In the past, a starkly different-looking plant would bear small fruits, not unlike the size of our fingers. The early civilization in Mexico did not have the present knowledge and resource about corn’s biology and genetics. It took several thousands of years of selectively cultivating the desirable traits of the plant teosinte into the hearty sized corn cob that we know and love today.

But not always

Not all agriculture research has turned out desirable, however. For years, people have worked on producing a big, juicy variant of red tomatoes. Researchers have tinkered with the genes that influence the size of the fruit. By doing so, they have unintentionally affected the genes that make the tomatoes taste good. Therefore, some big tomatoes today aren’t palatable as the genetic pathway responsible for its distinct sweetness was accidentally altered.

Nevertheless, agricultural science is hard at work on its effort to keep the world fed and healthy. It is unswayed in finding better ways to produce food that meet the demands of the modern world.

Price For Progress

However, it seems that the modern world is the giant goliath of farmers and scientists. Our idea of progress and advancement left out the contribution of agriculture in the past. Not to mention, people now prefer working in offices and establishments. The rise in population, decreasing land area to grow food, and the declining number of people who see farming as a good job to get all threaten our food security.

In urban areas, indoor gardening is gaining momentum. The rising prices of commodities makes growing your food a sensible choice. However, we should note that that small space in your apartment balcony or that small strip of land beside your house can’t feed you and your family forever.

10+ Agriculture Research Examples

If we can’t regain the farm lands or provide support to the dwindling population of farmers, we will face food crisis. We need to intensify agricultural research to prevent global hunger.

1. National Agriculture Research Example

Size: 91 KB

2. Global Agriculture Research System Example

Size: 727 KB

3. Agriculture Research in Development Example

Size: 271 KB

4. Agriculture Investment Research Example

Size: 405 KB

5. Computer Application in Agriculture Research Example

Size: 299 KB

6. Standard Agriculture Research Example

Size: 251 KB

7. Printable Agricultural Research Example

Size: 984 KB

8. Long Term Agriculture Research Example

Size: 654 KB

9. Agriculture Assessment Ethics Research Example

Size: 284 KB

10. Sample Agriculture Research in Development Example

Size: 145 KB

11. Public Agriculture Research Example

Size: 124 KB

Getting Started

The following are reminders on how to make writing your agricultural research papers less arduous.

1. Define The Problem

Your first step to any research is identifying the area that you wish to work on. A literature review is a good way to start your case. Reading on updated and recent materials regarding your chosen topic will help you explore the problem and determine its place in the context of society. Is the problem urgent? Is your contribution original? By spotting the gaps in related literature, you can give new information or significantly improve current practices.

2. Write A Proposal

Drafting a research proposal requires the researcher’s familiarity with the chosen topic and thesis design. Reviewers will look into your capacity to perform the study before it is approved. The convincing pledge of skill is found in your literature review. When you are vying for a study grant, you should consider the interests of the institution that you are approaching. Their priorities should be aligned with the goals of your research.

3. The Common Good

Since you are proposing a study in agriculture, you should be aware of the goal of this community. Your expected findings should be beneficial to the farmers and the agricultural sector. The problem should be specific, clear, relevant, and timely. Even if the result will be negative, the study should still have something useful to provide the community. Don’t forget, your research must follow all the ethical guidelines for research.

4. Be Two Steps Ahead

Create a visual roadmap for your research project. Flow charts and research plans are organization tools that will help you a great deal during your entire endeavor. They keep you grounded on the things you have to perform. You can also track your progress the whole time using Gantt charts , and see to it that your goals are achieved. Cover your bases and plan a successful study ahead.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Recent advances in characterization and valorization of lignin and its value-added products: challenges and future perspectives.

1. Introduction

Research Gap and Objective of the Study

2. methodology, 2.1. understanding lignin: characterization as the foundation for sustainable valorization, 2.2. chemical analysis (compositional methods), 2.3. spectroscopic techniques for characterization of lignin, 2.4. microscopic techniques for characterization of lignin, 3. pretreatment: loosening bonds with other biomass components, 3.1. thermal depolymerization of lignin, 3.2. catalytic depolymerization, 3.3. ionic liquid pretreatment for lignin depolymerization, 3.4. biological depolymerization of lignin, 3.5. emerging techniques for valorization of lignin, 4. challenges and readiness of lignin depolymerization, 5. advancements in the valorization of lignin, 5.1. lignin as a source of biofuels, 5.2. lignin-derived chemicals and materials, 5.3. lignin in polymer blends and composites, 5.4. lignin as a uv protector and antioxidant, 5.5. functionalization and modification of lignin, 5.6. economic and environmental benefits of lignin valorization, 6. exploring the expanding applications of upgraded lignin, 6.1. lignin as precursors for biofuels and bio-based chemicals, 6.2. role of lignin as a functional additive in biocomposites, 6.3. source of aromatic building blocks for novel biomaterials, 6.4. reduced reliance on fossil resources, 6.5. efficient use of natural resources, 6.6. lignin valorization for polyurethane, 6.7. lignin for bioplastics, 7. conclusions, future prospects and recommendations, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Dar, M.A.; Xie, R.; Zabed, H.M.; Ali, S.; Zhu, D.; Sun, J. Termite Microbial Symbiosis as a Model for Innovative Design of Lignocellulosic Future Biorefinery: Current Paradigms and Future Perspectives. Biomass 2024 , 4 , 180–201. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, S.; Shah, T.A.; Afzal, A.; Tabassum, R. Exploring Lignocellulosic Biomass for Bio-Methane Potential by Anaerobic Digestion and Its Economic Feasibility. Energy Environ. 2018 , 29 , 742–751. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brienza, F.; Cannella, D.; Montesdeoca, D.; Cybulska, I.; Debecker, D.P. A Guide to Lignin Valorization in Biorefineries: Traditional, Recent, and Forthcoming Approaches to Convert Raw Lignocellulose into Valuable Materials and Chemicals. RSC Sustain. 2024 , 2 , 37–90. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, S.; Shah, T.A.; Afzal, A.; Tabassum, R. Analysis of Agricultural Substrates for Nutritive Values and Biomethane Potential. Curr. Sci. 2018 , 115 , 292–299. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhao, L.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, C.-C.; Nan, J.; Ren, N.; Lee, D.-J.; Chen, C. Advances in pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy production: Challenges and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2021 , 343 , 126123. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rosini, E.; Molinari, F.; Miani, D.; Pollegioni, L. Lignin Valorization: Production of High Value-Added Compounds by Engineered Microorganisms. Catalysts 2023 , 13 , 555. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• del Río, J.C.; Rencoret, J.; Gutiérrez, A.; Elder, T.; Kim, H.; Ralph, J. Lignin Monomers from beyond the Canonical Monolignol Biosynthetic Pathway: Another Brick in the Wall. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020 , 8 , 4997–5012. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dixon, R.; Barros-Rios, J. Lignin Biosynthesis: Old Roads Revisited and New Roads Explored. Open Biol. 2019 , 9 , 190215. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Gonçalves, S.; Ferra, J.; Paiva, N.; Martins, J.; Carvalho, L.H.; Magalhães, F.D. Lignosulphonates as an Alternative to Non-Renewable Binders in Wood-Based Materials. Polymers 2021 , 13 , 4196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ekielski, A.; Mishra, P.K. Lignin for Bioeconomy: The Present and Future Role of Technical Lignin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 , 22 , 63. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Giardino, G.J.; Wang, H.; Niu, J.; Wang, D. From Technical Lignin to Native Lignin: Depolymerization, Functionalization, and Applications. Chem. Phys. Rev. 2024 , 5 , 021302. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, S.; Rani, A.; Sethupathy, S.; Liaqat, F.; Shunkai, W.; Shah, T.A.; Zhu, D. Advanced Technologies for Transforming Biomass to Biofuels. In Integrated Solutions for Smart and Sustainable Environmental Conservation ; Mabrouki, J., Azrour, M., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 47–64. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zoghlami, A.; Paës, G. Lignocellulosic Biomass: Understanding Recalcitrance and Predicting Hydrolysis. Front. Chem. 2019 , 7 , 874. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ali, S.; Dar, M.A.; Liaqat, F.; Sethupathy, S.; Rani, A.; Khan, M.I.; Rehan, M.; Zhu, D. Optimization of Biomethane Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass by a Developed Microbial Consortium. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024 , 184 , 1106–1118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sapouna, I.; van Erven, G.; Heidling, E.; Lawoko, M.; McKee, L.S. Impact of Extraction Method on the Structure of Lignin from Ball-Milled Hardwood. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023 , 11 , 15533–15543. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Beaucamp, A.; Muddasar, M.; Amiinu, I.S.; Moraes Leite, M.; Culebras, M.; Latha, K.; Gutiérrez, M.C.; Rodriguez-Padron, D.; del Monte, F.; Kennedy, T.; et al. Lignin for Energy Applications—State of the Art, Life Cycle, Technoeconomic Analysis and Future Trends. Green Chem. 2022 , 24 , 8193–8226. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Laurichesse, S.; Avérous, L. Chemical Modification of Lignins: Towards Biobased Polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 39 , 1266–1290. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Smolarski, N. High-Value Opportunities for Lignin: Unlocking Its Potential Market Insights. Frost Sullivan 2012 , 1 , 1–15. [ Google Scholar ]
• Norgren, M.; Edlund, H. Lignin: Recent Advances and Emerging Applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014 , 19 , 409–416. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lora, J.H.; Glasser, W.G. Recent Industrial Applications of Lignin: A Sustainable Alternative to Nonrenewable Materials. J. Polym. Environ. 2002 , 10 , 39–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhao, X.; Cheng, K.; Liu, D. Organosolv Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009 , 82 , 815–827. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brodin, I.; Ernstsson, M.; Gellerstedt, G.; Sjöholm, E. Oxidative Stabilisation of Kraft Lignin for Carbon Fibre Production. Holzforschung 2011 , 66 , 141–147. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, Z.-H.; Hao, N.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Dou, C.; Lin, F.; Shen, R.; Bura, R.; Hodge, D.B.; Dale, B.E.; Ragauskas, A.J.; et al. Transforming Biorefinery Designs with ‘Plug-In Processes of Lignin’ to Enable Economic Waste Valorization. Nat. Commun. 2021 , 12 , 3912. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tribot, A.; Amer, G.; Abdou Alio, M.; de Baynast, H.; Delattre, C.; Pons, A.; Mathias, J.-D.; Callois, J.-M.; Vial, C.; Michaud, P.; et al. Wood-Lignin: Supply, Extraction Processes and Use as Bio-Based Material. Eur. Polym. J. 2019 , 112 , 228–240. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Anthony, W.E.; Carr, R.R.; DeLorenzo, D.M.; Campbell, T.P.; Shang, Z.; Foston, M.; Moon, T.S.; Dantas, G. Development of Rhodococcus opacus as a Chassis for Lignin Valorization and Bioproduction of High-Value Compounds. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019 , 12 , 192. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ali, S.; Shah, T.A.; Afzal, A.; Tabbassum, R. Evaluating the co-digestion effects on chicken manure and rotten potatoes in batch experiments. Int. J. Biosci. 2017 , 10 , 150–159. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kocaturk, E.; Salan, T.; Ozcelik, O.; Alma, M.H.; Candan, Z. Recent Advances in Lignin-Based Biofuel Production. Energies 2023 , 16 , 3382. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shah, T.A.; Ali, S.; Afzal, A.; Tabassum, R. Simultaneous Pretreatment and Biohydrogen Production from Wheat Straw by Newly Isolated Ligninolytic Bacillus sp. Strains with Two-Stage Batch Fermentation System. BioEnergy Res. 2018 , 11 , 835–849. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Blasi, A.; Verardi, A.; Lopresto, C.G.; Siciliano, S.; Sangiorgio, P. Lignocellulosic Agricultural Waste Valorization to Obtain Valuable Products: An Overview. Recycling 2023 , 8 , 61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gao, Y.; Walker, M.J.; Barrett, J.A.; Hosseinaei, O.; Harper, D.P.; Ford, P.C.; Williams, B.J.; Foston, M.B. Analysis of Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Data for Catalytic Lignin Depolymerization Using Positive Matrix Factorization. Green Chem. 2018 , 20 , 4366–4377. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jiang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, T.; Zhao, H.; Jin, Y. Structural Characterization of Lignin and Lignin-Carbohydrate Complex (LCC) from Ginkgo Shells ( Ginkgo biloba L.) by Comprehensive NMR Spectroscopy. Polymers 2018 , 10 , 736. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, Q.; Zhang, X. An Integral Method for Determining the Molecular Composition of Lignin and Its Application. Sci. Rep. 2022 , 12 , 19136. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Richel, A.; Vanderghem, C.; Simon, M.; Wathelet, B.; Paquot, M. Evaluation of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Second-Generation Lignin Analysis. Anal. Chem. Insights 2012 , 7 , 79. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Yang, J.; Sun, M.; Jiao, L.; Dai, H. Molecular Weight Distribution and Dissolution Behavior of Lignin in Alkaline Solutions. Polymers 2021 , 13 , 4166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Levdansky, A.V.; Kondrasenko, A.A.; Malyar, Y.N.; Levdansky, V.A.; Kuznetsov, B.N. Study of Organosolv Lignins by Methods of FTIR and NMR Spectroscopy. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Chem. 2019 , 12 , 201–220. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shi, Z.; Xu, G.; Deng, J.; Dong, M.; Murugadoss, V.; Liu, C.; Shao, Q.; Wu, S.; Guo, Z. Structural Characterization of Lignin from D. sinicus by FTIR and NMR Techniques. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2019 , 12 , 235–243. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, J.-Q.; Yin, J.-Y.; Nie, S.-P.; Xie, M.-Y. A review of NMR analysis in polysaccharide structure and conformation: Progress, challenge and perspective. Food Res. Int. 2021 , 143 , 110290. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yuan, T.Q.; Sun, S.N.; Xu, F.; Sun, R.C. Characterization of Lignin Structures and Lignin–Carbohydrate Complex (LCC) Linkages by Quantitative 13C and 2D HSQC NMR Spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011 , 59 , 10604–10614. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mansfield, S.D.; Kim, H.; Lu, F.; Ralph, J. Whole Plant Cell Wall Characterization Using Solution-State 2D NMR. Nat. Protoc. 2012 , 7 , 1579–1589. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Blindheim, F.H.; Ruwoldt, J. The Effect of Sample Preparation Techniques on Lignin Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Polymers 2023 , 15 , 2901. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alzagameem, A.; El Khaldi-Hansen, B.; Büchner, D.; Larkins, M.; Kamm, B.; Witzleben, S.; Schulze, M. Molecules Lignocellulosic Biomass as Source for Lignin-Based Environmentally Benign Antioxidants. Molecules 2018 , 23 , 2664. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meraj, A.; Jawaid, M.; Singh, S.P.; Nasef, M.M.; Ariffin, H.; Fouad, H.; Abu-Jdayil, B. Isolation and Characterisation of Lignin Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents Pretreated Kenaf Fibre Biomass. Sci. Rep. 2024 , 14 , 8672. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fattahi, S.H.; Kazemi, A.; Khojastehnazhand, M.; Roostaei, M.; Mahmoudi, A. The classification of Iranian wheat flour varieties using FT-MIR spectroscopy and chemometrics methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024 , 239 , 122175. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dütsch, L.; Sander, K.; Brendler, E.; Bremer, M.; Fischer, S.; Vogt, C.; Zuber, J. Chemometric Combination of Ultrahigh Resolving Mass Spectrometry and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for a Structural Characterization of Lignin Compounds. ACS Omega 2024 , 9 , 628–641. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kumar, A.; Biswas, B.; Kaur, R.; Rani, R.; Krishna, B.B.; Bhaskar, T. Structure Elucidation of Prot, Alkali and Dealkaline Lignin(s) by NMR, FT-IR and Py-GC/MS: Effect of Solid Acid and Base Catalysts. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2023 , 7 , 1942–1954. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lundquist, K. Proton (1H) NMR Spectroscopy. In Methods in Lignin Chemistry ; Lin, S.Y., Dence, C.W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; pp. 242–249. ISBN 978-3-642-74065-7. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wen, J.L.; Sun, S.L.; Xue, B.L.; Sun, R.C. Recent Advances in Characterization of Lignin Polymer by Solution-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Methodology. Materials 2013 , 6 , 359–391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Falcioni, R.; Moriwaki, T.; Furlanetto, R.H.; Nanni, M.R.; Antunes, W.C. Simple, Fast and Efficient Methods for Analysing the Structural, Ultrastructural and Cellular Components of the Cell Wall. Plants 2022 , 11 , 995. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Fromm, J.; Rockel, B.; Lautner, S.; Windeisen, E.; Wanner, G. Lignin Distribution in Wood Cell Walls Determined by TEM and Backscattered SEM Techniques. J. Struct. Biol. 2003 , 143 , 77–84. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Xu, F. Chemical Characteristics of Wood Cell Wall with an Emphasis on Ultrastructure: A Mini-Review. Forests 2022 , 13 , 439. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Magalhaes, D.; Gürel, K.; Matsakas, L.; Christakopoulos, P.; Pisano, I.; Leahy, J.; Kazanç, F.; Trubetskaya, A. Prediction of Yields and Composition of Char from Fast Pyrolysis of Commercial Lignocellulosic Materials, Organosolv Fractionated and Torrefied Olive Stones. Fuel 2021 , 289 , 119862. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Reza, M.; Kontturi, E.; Jääskeläinen, A.-S.; Vuorinen, T.; Ruokolainen, J. Transmission Electron Microscopy for Wood and Fiber Analysis—A Review. Bioresources 2015 , 10 , 6230–6261. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ton-That, M.T.; Ngo, T.; Lebarbe, T.; Ahvazi, B.; Bélanger, C.; Hu, W.; Hawari, J.; Monteil-Rivera, F.; Pilon, A.; Langlois, A.; et al. Development of Ligno-Polyol for the Production of Polyurethanes. In Proceedings of the Polyurethanes 2010 Technical Conference, Houston, TX, USA, 11–13 October 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gracia-Vitoria, J.; Rubens, M.; Feghali, E.; Adriaensens, P.; Vanbroekhoven, K.; Vendamme, R. Low-Field Benchtop versus High-Field NMR for Routine 31P Analysis of Lignin, a Comparative Study. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022 , 176 , 114405. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Melone, F.; Saladino, R.; Crestini, C. Tannin Structural Elucidation and Quantitative 31P NMR Analysis. 1. Model Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013 , 61 , 9307–9315. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• LibreTexts, C. 4.7 Identifying Characteristic Functional Groups. Available online: https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Introduction_to_Organic_Spectroscopy/04:_Infrared_Spectroscopy/4.07_Identifying_Characteristic_Functional_Groups (accessed on 6 June 2024).
• Materials, A. FTIR Basic Organic Functional Group Reference Chart. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.cn/blog/materials/a-gift-for-you-an-ftir-basic-organic-functional-group-reference-chart/ (accessed on 8 June 2024).
• Enders, A.A.; North, N.M.; Fensore, C.M.; Velez-Alvarez, J.; Allen, H.C. Functional Group Identification for FTIR Spectra Using Image-Based Machine Learning Models. Anal. Chem. 2021 , 93 , 9711–9718. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Liao, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, Q.; Ma, L.; Wang, C. Advances in Understanding the Humins: Formation, Prevention and Application. Appl. Energy Combust. Sci. 2022 , 10 , 100062. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, C.; Li, H.; Li, M.; Bian, J.; Sun, R. Revealing the Structure and Distribution Changes of Eucalyptus Lignin during the Hydrothermal and Alkaline Pretreatments. Sci. Rep. 2017 , 7 , 593. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Alwani, M.S.; Omar, A.K.M. Chemical Composition, Anatomy, Lignin Distribution, and Cell Wall Structure of Malaysian Plant Waste Fibers. Bioresources 2006 , 1 , 220–232. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Morita, K.; Takenaka, M.; Tomita, K.; Ishii, J.; Kawaguchi, H.; Murakami, D.; Amo, H.; Fujii, M.; Maruyama, T.; Matsumoto, T.; et al. Nanoscopic Lignin Mapping on Cellulose Nanofibers via Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy. Cellulose 2023 , 30 , 11357–11367. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Letourneau, D.; Volmer, D. Mass Spectrometry-based Methods for the Advanced Characterization and Structural Analysis of Lignin: A Review. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2021 , 42 , 144–188. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kusch, P. Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry of Polymeric Materials. In Advanced Gas Chromatography-Progress in Agricultural, Biomedical and Industrial Applications ; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; ISBN 978-953-51-0298-4. [ Google Scholar ]
• Reyes-Rivera, J.; Terrazas, T. Lignin Analysis by HPLC and FTIR. In Xylem ; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 1544, pp. 193–211. ISBN 978-1-4939-6720-9. [ Google Scholar ]
• AZoOptics. The Future of Lignin Research Using Mass Spectrometry. Available online: https://www.azooptics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=2438 (accessed on 8 June 2024).
• Prothmann, J.; Spégel, P.; Sandahl, M.; Turner, C. Identification of Lignin Oligomers in Kraft Lignin Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/High-Resolution Multiple-Stage Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC/HRMS(n)). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018 , 410 , 7803–7814. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, R.; Qi, Y.; Ma, C.; Ge, J.; Hu, Q.; Yue, F.J.; Li, S.L.; Volmer, D.A. Characterization of Lignin Compounds at the Molecular Level: Mass Spectrometry Analysis and Raw Data Processing. Molecules 2021 , 26 , 178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhu, L.; Cui, C.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Z.; Qi, F. Thermochemical Depolymerization of Lignin: Process Analysis with State-of-the-Art Soft Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Front. Chem. Eng. 2022 , 4 , 982126. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xu, Z.; Lei, P.; Zhai, R.; Wen, Z.; Jin, M. Recent Advances in Lignin Valorization with Bacterial Cultures: Microorganisms, Metabolic Pathways, and Bio-Products. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019 , 12 , 32. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lobato-Peralta, D.R.; Duque-Brito, E.; Villafán-Vidales, H.I.; Longoria, A.; Sebastian, P.J.; Cuentas-Gallegos, A.K.; Arancibia-Bulnes, C.A.; Okoye, P.U. A Review on Trends in Lignin Extraction and Valorization of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Energy Applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 293 , 126123. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhou, N.; Thilakarathna, W.P.D.W.; He, Q.S.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V. A Review: Depolymerization of Lignin to Generate High-Value Bio-Products: Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects. Front. Energy Res. 2022 , 9 , 758744. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Syed, M.W.; Kazmi, W.W.; Hussain, A.; Shah, S.F.A.; Kariim, I.; Mehdi, A.M.; Omer, A.; Bhatti, A.H.; Eze, F.; Bhatti, U.H. Lignin Liquefaction: Unraveling the Effect of Process Conditions and Sustainable Pathways for Biofuel Production—A Comprehensive Review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024 , 313 , 118615. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Han, Y.; Simmons, B.A.; Singh, S. Perspective on Oligomeric Products from Lignin Depolymerization: Their Generation, Identification, and Further Valorization. Ind. Chem. Mater. 2023 , 1 , 207–223. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhou, H.; Guo, W.; Xu, B.; Teng, Z.; Tao, D.; Lou, Y.; Gao, Y. Screening and Identification of Lignin-Degrading Bacteria in Termite Gut and the Construction of LiP-Expressing Recombinant Lactococcus lactis . Microb. Pathog. 2017 , 112 , 63–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schutyser, W.; Renders, T.; Van Den Bosch, S.; Koelewijn, S.F.; Beckham, G.T.; Sels, B.F. Chemicals from Lignin: An Interplay of Lignocellulose Fractionation, Depolymerisation, and Upgrading. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018 , 47 , 852–908. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jae, J.; Tompsett, G.A.; Foster, A.J.; Hammond, K.D.; Auerbach, S.M.; Lobo, R.F.; Huber, G.W. Investigation into the Shape Selectivity of Zeolite Catalysts for Biomass Conversion. J. Catal. 2011 , 279 , 257–268. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, X.; Zhu, L.; Cui, C.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Qi, F. In Situ Atmospheric Pressure Photoionization Mass Spectrometric Monitoring of Initial Pyrolysis Products of Biomass in Real Time. Anal. Chem. 2020 , 92 , 603–606. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Biswas, B.; Kumar, A.; Krishna, B.B.; Baltrusaitis, J.; Adhikari, S.; Bhaskar, T. Catalytic Depolymerization of Lignin for the Selective Production of Phenolic Monomers over Cobalt-Supported Calcium Catalysts. Energy Fuels 2023 , 37 , 3813–3824. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Katahira, R.; Mittal, A.; McKinney, K.; Chen, X.; Tucker, M.P.; Johnson, D.K.; Beckham, G.T. Base-Catalyzed Depolymerization of Biorefinery Lignins. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016 , 4 , 1474–1486. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gao, D.; Ouyang, D.; Zhao, X. Electro-Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin for Production of Value-Added Chemicals. Green Chem. 2022 , 24 , 8585–8605. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rana, M.; Ghosh, S.; Nshizirungu, T.; Park, J.H. Catalytic Depolymerization of Kraft Lignin to High Yield Alkylated-Phenols over CoMo/SBA-15 Catalyst in Supercritical Ethanol. RSC Adv. 2023 , 13 , 30022–30039. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Deepa, A.K.; Dhepe, P.L. Solid Acid Catalyzed Depolymerization of Lignin into Value Added Aromatic Monomers. RSC Adv. 2014 , 4 , 12625–12629. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baxter, K.; Driver, S.; Williamson, E. Stockley’s Herbal Medicines Interactions ; Pharmaceutical Press: London, UK, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Han, Y.; Ye, L.; Gu, X.; Zhu, P.; Lu, X. Lignin-Based Solid Acid Catalyst for the Conversion of Cellulose to Levulinic Acid Using γ-Valerolactone as Solvent. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019 , 127 , 88–93. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bi, Y.; Lei, X.; Xu, G.; Chen, H.; Hu, J. Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Kraft Lignin over Hierarchical HZSM-5 and Hβ Zeolites. Catalysts 2018 , 8 , 82. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mateo, W.; Lei, H.; Villota, E.; Qian, M.; Zhao, Y.; Huo, E.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, X.; Wang, C. One-Step Synthesis of Biomass-Based Sulfonated Carbon Catalyst by Direct Carbonization-Sulfonation for Organosolv Delignification. Bioresour. Technol. 2021 , 319 , 124194. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Scholz, D.; Xie, J.; Kröcher, O.; Vogel, F. Mechanochemistry-Assisted Hydrolysis of Softwood over Stable Sulfonated Carbon Catalysts in a Semi-Batch Process. RSC Adv. 2019 , 9 , 33525–33538. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ovejero-Pérez, A.; Rigual, V.; Domínguez, J.C.; Alonso, M.V.; Oliet, M.; Rodriguez, F. Acidic Depolymerization vs Ionic Liquid Solubilization in Lignin Extraction from Eucalyptus Wood Using the Protic Ionic Liquid 1-Methylimidazolium Chloride. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020 , 157 , 461–469. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Achinivu, E.C. Protic Ionic Liquids for Lignin Extraction-A Lignin Characterization Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 , 19 , 428. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Roy, R.; Rahman, M.S.; Amit, T.A.; Jadhav, B. Recent Advances in Lignin Depolymerization Techniques: A Comparative Overview of Traditional and Greener Approaches. Biomass 2022 , 2 , 130–154. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Radhika, N.L.; Sachdeva, S.; Kumar, M. Lignin Depolymerization and Biotransformation to Industrially Important Chemicals/Biofuels. Fuel 2022 , 312 , 122935. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• da Cruz, M.G.A.; Gueret, R.; Chen, J.; Piątek, J.; Beele, B.; Sipponen, M.H.; Frauscher, M.; Budnyk, S.; Rodrigues, B.V.M.; Slabon, A. Electrochemical Depolymerization of Lignin in a Biomass-Based Solvent. ChemSusChem 2022 , 15 , e202200718. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Abdelaziz, O.Y.; Clemmensen, I.; Meier, S.; Costa, C.A.E.; Rodrigues, A.E.; Hulteberg, C.P.; Riisager, A. On the Oxidative Valorization of Lignin to High-Value Chemicals: A Critical Review of Opportunities and Challenges. ChemSusChem 2022 , 15 , e202201232. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gu, J.; Qiu, Q.; Yu, Y.; Sun, X.; Tian, K.; Chang, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Huo, H. Bacterial Transformation of Lignin: Key Enzymes and High-Value Products. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2024 , 17 , 2. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Weng, C.; Peng, X.; Han, Y. Depolymerization and Conversion of Lignin to Value-Added Bioproducts by Microbial and Enzymatic Catalysis. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021 , 14 , 84. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Janusz, G.; Pawlik, A.; Sulej, J.; Świderska-Burek, U.; Jarosz-Wilkołazka, A.; Paszczyński, A. Lignin Degradation: Microorganisms, Enzymes Involved, Genomes Analysis and Evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017 , 41 , 941–962. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chai, L.Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Tang, C.J.; Yang, Z.H.; Zheng, Y.; Shi, Y. Depolymerization and Decolorization of Kraft Lignin by Bacterium Comamonas sp. B-9. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014 , 98 , 1907–1912. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, Y.; Chai, L.; Tang, C.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, H. Kraft Lignin Biodegradation by Novosphingobium sp. B-7 and Analysis of the Degradation Process. Bioresour. Technol. 2012 , 123 , 682–685. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, Y.H.; Chai, L.Y.; Zhu, Y.H.; Yang, Z.H.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, H. Biodegradation of Kraft Lignin by a Bacterial Strain Comamonas sp. B-9 Isolated from Eroded Bamboo Slips. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012 , 112 , 900–906. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dar, M.A.; Xie, R.; Jing, L.; Qing, X.; Ali, S.; Pandit, R.S.; Shaha, C.M.; Sun, J. Elucidating the Structure, and Composition of Bacterial Symbionts in the Gut Regions of Wood-Feeding Termite, Coptotermes formosanus and Their Functional Profile towards Lignocellulolytic Systems. Front. Microbiol. 2024 , 15 , 1395568. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dar, M.A.; Xie, R.; Pandit, R.S.; Danso, B.; Dong, C.; Sun, J. Exploring the Region-Wise Diversity and Functions of Symbiotic Bacteria in the Gut System of Wood-Feeding Termite, Coptotermes formosanus , toward the Degradation of Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Organic Dyes. Insect Sci. 2022 , 29 , 1414–1432. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Suman, S.K.; Dhawaria, M.; Tripathi, D.; Raturi, V.; Adhikari, D.K.; Kanaujia, P.K. Investigation of Lignin Biodegradation by Trabulsiella sp. Isolated from Termite Gut. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016 , 112 , 12–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xie, R.; Dong, C.; Wang, S.; Danso, B.; Dar, M.A.; Pandit, R.S.; Pawar, K.D.; Geng, A.; Zhu, D.; Li, X.; et al. Host-Specific Diversity of Culturable Bacteria in the Gut Systems of Fungus-Growing Termites and Their Potential Functions towards Lignocellulose Bioconversion. Insects 2023 , 14 , 403. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, H.; Yelle, D.J.; Li, C.; Yang, M.; Ke, J.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, N.; Liang, S.; Mo, X.; et al. Lignocellulose Pretreatment in a Fungus-Cultivating Termite. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017 , 114 , 4709–4714. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, X.; Shi, Y.; Kong, W.; Wei, J.; Song, W.; Wang, S. Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by bio-coordinated physicochemical pretreatment—A review. Energy Reports 2022 , 8 , 696–709. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xiong, X.Q.; Liao, H.D.; Ma, J.S.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, L.Y.; Shi, X.W.; Yang, X.L.; Lu, X.N.; Zhu, Y.H. Isolation of a Rice Endophytic Bacterium, Pantoea sp. Sd-1, with Ligninolytic Activity and Characterization of Its Rice Straw Degradation Ability. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014 , 58 , 123–129. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yu, T.; Wu, W.; Liang, W.; Lever, M.A.; Hinrichs, K.U.; Wang, F. Growth of Sedimentary Bathyarchaeota on Lignin as an Energy Source. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018 , 115 , 6022–6027. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mallinson, S.J.B.; Machovina, M.M.; Silveira, R.L.; Garcia-Borràs, M.; Gallup, N.; Johnson, C.W.; Allen, M.D.; Skaf, M.S.; Crowley, M.F.; Neidle, E.L.; et al. A Promiscuous Cytochrome P450 Aromatic O-Demethylase for Lignin Bioconversion. Nat. Commun. 2018 , 9 , 2487. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moraes, E.C.; Alvarez, T.M.; Persinoti, G.F.; Tomazetto, G.; Brenelli, L.B.; Paixão, D.A.A.; Ematsu, G.C.; Aricetti, J.A.; Caldana, C.; Dixon, N.; et al. Lignolytic-Consortium Omics Analyses Reveal Novel Genomes and Pathways Involved in Lignin Modification and Valorization. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018 , 11 , 75. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhu, D.; Zhang, P.; Xie, C.; Zhang, W.; Sun, J.; Qian, W.J.; Yang, B. Biodegradation of Alkaline Lignin by Bacillus ligniniphilus L1. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017 , 10 , 44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bharagava, R.N.; Mani, S.; Mulla, S.I.; Saratale, G.D. Degradation and Decolourization Potential of an Ligninolytic Enzyme Producing Aeromonas hydrophila for Crystal Violet Dye and Its Phytotoxicity Evaluation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018 , 156 , 166–175. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Majumdar, S.; Priyadarshinee, R.; Kumar, A.; Mandal, T.; Dasgupta Mandal, D. Exploring Planococcus sp. TRC1, a Bacterial Isolate, for Carotenoid Pigment Production and Detoxification of Paper Mill Effluent in Immobilized Fluidized Bed Reactor. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 211 , 1389–1402. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kumar, A.; Chandra, R. Ligninolytic Enzymes and Its Mechanisms for Degradation of Lignocellulosic Waste in Environment. Heliyon 2020 , 6 , e03170. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Levy-Booth, D.J.; Navas, L.E.; Fetherolf, M.M.; Liu, L.-Y.; Dalhuisen, T.; Renneckar, S.; Eltis, L.D.; Mohn, W.W. Discovery of Lignin-Transforming Bacteria and Enzymes in Thermophilic Environments Using Stable Isotope Probing. ISME J. 2022 , 16 , 1944–1956. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saritha, M.; Arora, A. Lata Biological Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Substrates for Enhanced Delignification and Enzymatic Digestibility. Indian J. Microbiol. 2012 , 52 , 122–130. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Junghans, U.; Bernhardt, J.J.; Wollnik, R.; Triebert, D.; Unkelbach, G.; Pufky-Heinrich, D. Valorization of Lignin via Oxidative Depolymerization with Hydrogen Peroxide: Towards Carboxyl-Rich Oligomeric Lignin Fragments. Molecules 2020 , 25 , 2717. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ayub, R.; Raheel, A. High-Value Chemicals from Electrocatalytic Depolymerization of Lignin: Challenges and Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022 , 23 , 3767. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhu, H.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, G.; Li, H.; Tang, Y.; Wan, P. Electrochemical Depolymerization of Lignin into Renewable Aromatic Compounds in a Non-Diaphragm Electrolytic Cell. RSC Adv. 2014 , 4 , 29917–29924. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhou, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhong, X.; Jiang, W.; Liang, Y.; Niu, P.; Li, M.; Zhuang, G.; Li, X.; Wang, J. Electrocatalytic Upgrading of Lignin-Derived Bio-Oil Based on Surface-Engineered PtNiB Nanostructure. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019 , 29 , 1807651. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Di Marino, D.; Stöckmann, D.; Kriescher, S.; Stiefel, S.; Wessling, M. Electrochemical Depolymerisation of Lignin in a Deep Eutectic Solvent. Green Chem. 2016 , 18 , 6021–6028. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fang, Z.; Li, F.; Wang, M.; Li, F.; Wu, X.; Fan, K.; Tang, Q.; Sun, L.; Zhang, P. Selective Electrocatalytic Upgrading of Lignin to Aryl Aldehydes and Carboxylic Acids over Dodecyl Sulfate-Intercalated CoS Nanocones. Appl. Catal. B 2023 , 323 , 122149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Umar, Y.; Velasco, O.; Abdelaziz, O.Y.; Aboelazayem, O.; Gadalla, M.A.; Hulteberg, C.P.; Saha, B. A Renewable Lignin-Derived Bio-Oil for Boosting the Oxidation Stability of Biodiesel. Renew. Energy 2022 , 182 , 867–878. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Akash, B. Thermal Depolymerization of Lignin. Int. J. Therm. Environ. Eng. 2016 , 13 , 17–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peng, M.; Muraishi, T.; Hou, X.; Zhao, M.; Kamiya, K.; Qian, E.W. Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin to Vanillin and Lactic Acid in an Aqueous Solution. Fuel 2023 , 348 , 128486. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huang, Y.B.; Zhang, J.L.; Zhang, X.; Luan, X.; Chen, H.Z.; Hu, B.; Zhao, L.; Wu, Y.L.; Lu, Q. Catalytic Depolymerization of Lignin via Transfer Hydrogenation Strategy over Skeletal CuZnAl Catalyst. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022 , 237 , 107448. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shorey, R.; Salaghi, A.; Fatehi, P.; Mekonnen, T.H. Valorization of Lignin for Advanced Material Applications: A Review. RSC Sustain. 2024 , 2 , 804–831. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Becker, J.; Wittmann, C. A Field of Dreams: Lignin Valorization into Chemicals, Materials, Fuels, and Health-Care Products. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019 , 37 , 107360. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ewuzie, R.N.; Genza, J.R.; Abdullah, A.Z. Catalytic Hydrogenolysis of Lignin in Isopropanol as Hydrogen Donor over Nickel-Cobalt Supported on Zeolite to Produce Aromatic and Phenolic Monomers. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2023 , 667 , 119443. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abdelaziz, O.Y.; Clemmensen, I.; Meier, S.; Bjelić, S.; Hulteberg, C.P.; Riisager, A. Oxidative Depolymerization of Kraft Lignin to Aromatics Over Bimetallic V–Cu/ZrO_2 Catalysts. Topics in Catalysis 2023 , 66 , 1369–1380. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huang, M.; Xu, J.; Ma, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Wu, C.; Ye, J.; Zhao, C.; Liu, X.; Chen, D.; et al. Bio-BTX Production from the Shape Selective Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Lignin Using Different Zeolite Catalysts: Relevance between the Chemical Structure and the Yield of Bio-BTX. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021 , 216 , 106792. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mujtaba, M.; Fernandes Fraceto, L.; Fazeli, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Savassa, S.M.; Araujo de Medeiros, G.; do Espírito Santo Pereira, A.; Mancini, S.D.; Lipponen, J.; Vilaplana, F. Lignocellulosic Biomass from Agricultural Waste to the Circular Economy: A Review with Focus on Biofuels, Biocomposites and Bioplastics. J. Clean. Prod. 2023 , 402 , 136815. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vasile, C.; Baican, M. Lignins as Promising Renewable Biopolymers and Bioactive Compounds for High-Performance Materials. Polymers 2023 , 15 , 3177. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yuan, J.; Du, G.; Yang, H.; Liu, S.; Park, S.; Liu, T.; Ran, X.; Park, B.D.; Gao, W.; Yang, L. Fully Bio-Based Adhesive Designed through Lignin-Cellulose Combination and Interfacial Bonding Reinforcement. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023 , 204 , 117279. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tian, Q.; Xu, P.; Huang, D.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Qin, H.; He, Y.; Li, R.; Yin, L.; Chen, S.; et al. The Driving Force of Biomass Value-Addition: Selective Catalytic Depolymerization of Lignin to High-Value Chemicals. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023 , 11 , 109719. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Naseem, A.; Tabasum, S.; Zia, K.M.; Zuber, M.; Ali, M.; Noreen, A. Lignin-Derivatives Based Polymers, Blends and Composites: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016 , 93 , 296–313. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, C.; Kim, T.H.; Liu, K.; Ma, M.G.; Choi, S.E.; Si, C. Multifunctional Lignin-Based Composite Materials for Emerging Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021 , 9 , 708976. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ridho, M.R.; Agustiany, E.A.; Rahmi Dn, M.; Madyaratri, E.W.; Ghozali, M.; Restu, W.K.; Falah, F.; Rahandi Lubis, M.A.; Syamani, F.A.; Nurhamiyah, Y.; et al. Lignin as Green Filler in Polymer Composites: Development Methods, Characteristics, and Potential Applications. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022 , 2022 , 1363481. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kadla, J.F.; Kubo, S. Lignin-Based Polymer Blends: Analysis of Intermolecular Interactions in Lignin–Synthetic Polymer Blends. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2004 , 35 , 395–400. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sadeghifar, H.; Ragauskas, A. Lignin as a UV Light Blocker—A Review. Polymers 2020 , 12 , 1134. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Wang, D.; Gu, Y.; Feng, S.; Yang, W.; Dai, H.; Xiao, H.; Han, J. Lignin-Containing Biodegradable UV-Blocking Films: A Review. Green Chem. 2023 , 25 , 9020–9044. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cavallo, E.; He, X.; Luzi, F.; Dominici, F.; Cerrutti, P.; Bernal, C.; Foresti, M.L.; Torre, L.; Puglia, D. UV Protective, Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Compostable Polylactic Acid Composites Containing Pristine and Chemically Modified Lignin Nanoparticles. Molecules 2020 , 26 , 126. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sameni, J.; Krigstin, S.; Sain, M. Solubility of Lignin and Acetylated Lignin in Organic Solvents. Bioresources 2017 , 12 , 1548–1565. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Johansson, M.; Skrifvars, M.; Kadi, N.; Dhakal, H.N. Effect of Lignin Acetylation on the Mechanical Properties of Lignin-Poly-Lactic Acid Biocomposites for Advanced Applications. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023 , 202 , 117049. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Inwood, J.P.W. Sulfonation of Kraft Lignin to Water Soluble Value Added Products. Ph.D. Thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang, Y.Y.; Meng, X.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A.J. Recent Advances in the Application of Functionalized Lignin in Value-Added Polymeric Materials. Polymers 2020 , 12 , 2277. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jacobs, B.; Yao, Y.; Van Nieuwenhove, I.; Sharma, D.; Graulus, G.J.; Bernaerts, K.; Verberckmoes, A. Sustainable Lignin Modifications and Processing Methods: Green Chemistry as the Way Forward. Green Chem. 2023 , 25 , 2042–2086. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Libretti, C.; Santos Correa, L.; Meier, M.A.R. From Waste to Resource: Advancements in Sustainable Lignin Modification. Green Chem. 2024 , 26 , 4358–4386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, T.; Li, H.; Diao, X.; Lu, X.; Ma, D.; Ji, N. Lignin to Dispersants, Adsorbents, Flocculants and Adhesives: A Critical Review on Industrial Applications of Lignin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023 , 199 , 116715. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sethupathy, S.; Murillo Morales, G.; Gao, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, B.; Jiang, J.; Sun, J.; Zhu, D. Lignin Valorization: Status, Challenges and Opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2022 , 347 , 126696. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Obydenkova, S.V.; Kouris, P.D.; Smeulders, D.M.J.; Boot, M.D.; van der Meer, Y. Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Hotspots and Value Creation in Multi-Product Lignocellulosic Biorefinery. Biomass Bioenergy 2022 , 159 , 106394. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mandal, D.D.; Singh, G.; Majumdar, S.; Chanda, P. Challenges in Developing Strategies for the Valorization of Lignin—A Major Pollutant of the Paper Mill Industry. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022 , 30 , 11119–11140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baral, N.R.; Banerjee, D.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Simmons, B.A.; Singer, S.W.; Scown, C.D. Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs of Simultaneous Sugar and Lignin Utilization for Biobased Fuels and Chemicals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024 , 12 , 2563–2576. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bilal, M.; Qamar, S.A.; Qamar, M.; Yadav, V.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Lam, S.S.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Bioprospecting Lignin Biomass into Environmentally Friendly Polymers—Applied Perspective to Reconcile Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024 , 14 , 4457–4483. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boarino, A.; Klok, H.A. Opportunities Challenges for Lignin Valorization in Food Packaging, Antimicrobial, and Agricultural Applications. Biomacromolecules 2023 , 24 , 1065. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pérez-Pimienta, J.A.; Rios-Del Toro, E.E.; Amezquita-Garcia, H.J.; Escamilla-Alvarado, C. 5-Advances in Biofuels and by-Products from Lignin. In Sustainable Biofuels ; Ray, R.C., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 101–130. ISBN 978-0-12-820297-5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Silau, H.; Melas, A.; Dam-Johansen, K.; Wu, H.; Daugaard, A.E.; Høj, M. Solvent Fractionation and Depolymerization Provide Liquid Lignin Fractions Exploited as Bio-Based Aromatic Building Blocks in Epoxies. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023 , 11 , 1591–1597. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Miranda-Valdez, I.Y.; Coffeng, S.; Zhou, Y.; Viitanen, L.; Hu, X.; Jannuzzi, L.; Puisto, A.; Kostiainen, M.A.; Mäkinen, T.; Koivisto, J.; et al. Foam-Formed Biocomposites Based on Cellulose Products and Lignin. Cellulose 2023 , 30 , 2253–2266. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baniasadi, H.; Lipponen, S.; Asplund, M.; Seppälä, J. High-Concentration Lignin Biocomposites with Low-Melting Point Biopolyamide. Chem. Eng. J. 2023 , 451 , 138564. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, J.; Lin, G.; Vaidya, U.; Wang, H. Past, Present and Future Prospective of Global Carbon Fibre Composite Developments and Applications. Compos. B Eng. 2023 , 250 , 110463. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Global and China Carbon Fiber and CFRP Industry Report, 2019–2025. Available online: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4770782/global-and-china-carbon-fiber-and-cfrp-industry (accessed on 22 June 2024).
• Qu, W.; Yang, J.; Sun, X.; Bai, X.; Jin, H.; Zhang, M. Towards Producing High-Quality Lignin-Based Carbon Fibers: A Review of Crucial Factors Affecting Lignin Properties and Conversion Techniques. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021 , 189 , 768–784. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sugiarto, S.; Leow, Y.; Tan, C.L.; Wang, G.; Kai, D. How Far Is Lignin from Being a Biomedical Material? Bioact. Mater. 2022 , 8 , 71–94. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Gaudenzi, E.; Cardone, F.; Lu, X.; Canestrari, F. The Use of Lignin for Sustainable Asphalt Pavements: A Literature Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023 , 362 , 129773. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vinod, A.; Pulikkalparambil, H.; Jagadeesh, P.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S. Recent Advancements in Lignocellulose Biomass-Based Carbon Fiber: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Heliyon 2023 , 9 , e13614. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhou, M.; Fakayode, O.A.; Ahmed Yagoub, A.E.; Ji, Q.; Zhou, C. Lignin Fractionation from Lignocellulosic Biomass Using Deep Eutectic Solvents and Its Valorization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022 , 156 , 111986. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, H.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A.; Yang, B. From Lignin to Valuable Products–Strategies, Challenges, and Prospects. Bioresour. Technol. 2018 , 271 , 449–461. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Abolore, R.S.; Jaiswal, S.; Jaiswal, A.K. Green and Sustainable Pretreatment Methods for Cellulose Extraction from Lignocellulosic Biomass and Its Applications: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2024 , 7 , 100396. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luo, Z.; Liu, C.; Radu, A.; de Waard, D.F.; Wang, Y.; Behaghel de Bueren, J.T.; Kouris, P.D.; Boot, M.D.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. Carbon–Carbon Bond Cleavage for a Lignin Refinery. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2024 , 1 , 61–72. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Quinsaat, J.E.Q.; Falireas, P.G.; Feghali, E.; Torr, K.M.; Vanbroekhoven, K.; Eevers, W.; Vendamme, R. Depolymerised Lignin Oil: A Promising Building Block towards Thermoplasticity in Polyurethanes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023 , 194 , 116305. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vieira, F.R.; Magina, S.; Evtuguin, D.V.; Barros-Timmons, A. Lignin as a Renewable Building Block for Sustainable Polyurethanes. Materials 2022 , 15 , 6182. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, X.; Chen, J.; Zhu, J.; Yan, N. Lignin-Based Polyurethane: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2021 , 42 , 2000492. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lignin Industries Starts Production of Lignin-Based Material Renol®, to Replace Fossil-Based Plastics, with a Capacity of More than 1000 Tonnes/Year—Lignin Industries AB. Available online: https://www.lignin.se/news/2021/2/22/rencom-starts-the-production-of-its-lignin-based-material-renol-to-replace-fossil-based-plastics-with-a-capacity-of-more-than-1000-tonnesyear (accessed on 22 June 2024).
• RenCom Announces Company Name Change to Lignin Industries AB—Lignin Industries AB. Available online: https://www.lignin.se/news/-name-change-to-lignin-industries (accessed on 22 June 2024).
• UPM-Kymmene Corp Patent: Lignin-Based Bioplastic for Agriculture Items. Available online: https://www.packaging-gateway.com/data-insights/upm-kymmene-files-patent-for-lignin-based-bioplastic-material-for-agriculture-items/ (accessed on 22 June 2024).
• US Patent. Application for Lignin-Based Bioplastic Material, Processes for Preparing the Same and Uses Thereof Patent Application)—Justia Patents Search. US Patent Application #20240026157, 25 January 2024. Available online: https://patents.justia.com/patent/20240026157 (accessed on 22 June 2024).

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Ali, S.; Rani, A.; Dar, M.A.; Qaisrani, M.M.; Noman, M.; Yoganathan, K.; Asad, M.; Berhanu, A.; Barwant, M.; Zhu, D. Recent Advances in Characterization and Valorization of Lignin and Its Value-Added Products: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Biomass 2024 , 4 , 947-977. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4030053

Ali S, Rani A, Dar MA, Qaisrani MM, Noman M, Yoganathan K, Asad M, Berhanu A, Barwant M, Zhu D. Recent Advances in Characterization and Valorization of Lignin and Its Value-Added Products: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Biomass . 2024; 4(3):947-977. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4030053

Ali, Shehbaz, Abida Rani, Mudasir A. Dar, Muther Mansoor Qaisrani, Muhammad Noman, Kamaraj Yoganathan, Muhammad Asad, Ashenafi Berhanu, Mukul Barwant, and Daochen Zhu. 2024. "Recent Advances in Characterization and Valorization of Lignin and Its Value-Added Products: Challenges and Future Perspectives" Biomass 4, no. 3: 947-977. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4030053

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals