A Summary and Analysis of Sophocles’ Oedipus the King
By Dr Oliver Tearle (Loughborough University)
The plot of Sophoclesâ great tragedy Oedipus the King (sometimes known as Oedipus Rex or Oedipus Tyrannos ) has long been admired. In his Poetics , Aristotle held it up as the exemplary Greek tragedy . Samuel Taylor Coleridge called it one of the three perfect plots in all of literature (the other two being Ben Jonsonâs The Alchemist and Henry Fieldingâs Tom Jones ).
Oedipus the King might also be called the first detective story in Western literature. Yet how well do we know Sophoclesâ play? And what does a closer analysis of its plot features and themes reveal?
The city of Thebes is in the grip of a terrible plague. The cityâs king, Oedipus, sends Creon to consult the Delphic oracle, who announces that if the city rids itself of a murderer, the plague will disappear. The murderer in question is the unknown killer of the cityâs previous king, Laius. Oedipus adopts a sort of detective role, and endeavours to sniff out the murderer.
He himself is plagued by another prophecy: that he would one day kill his father and marry his mother. He thinks heâs managed to thwart the prophecy by leaving home â and his parents â back in Corinth. On his way from Corinth to Thebes, he had an altercation with a man on the road: neither party would back down to let the other past, and Oedipus ended up killing the man in perhaps Western literatureâs first instance of road rage.
Then Oedipus learns that his âfatherâ back in Corinth was not his biological parent: he was adopted after his ârealâ parents left him for dead on a hillside, and he was rescued by a kindly shepherd who rescued him, took the child in, and raised him as his own. (The name Oedipus is Greek for âswollen footâ, from the chains put through the infantâs feet when it was left on the mountain.)
Tiresias the seer then reveals that the man Oedipus killed on the road was Laius â the former king of Thebes and (shock horror! Twist!) Oedipusâ biological father. Laiusâ widow, Jocasta, is Oedipusâ own mother â and the woman Oedipus had married upon his arrival in Thebes.
When this terrible truth is revealed, Jocasta hangs herself, and Oedipus puts out his own eyes and leaves Thebes, going into self-imposed exile so he can free the Thebans from the plague.
This much constitutes a brief recap or summary of the plot of Oedipus the King . How we should interpret and analyse its use of prophecy and Oedipusâ own culpability, however, remains a less clear-cut matter. Is Oedipus to blame for what happens to him? Or is he simply a pawn of the gods and fates, to be used according to their whim?
Eventually, the nemesis can take no more and raises an army against Winter Kay. One of his soldiers, bearing a golden badge that resembles an eye in shape, is the one who kills Winter Kay in battle. In his dying moments, the hapless villain realises that, in seeking to avert the prophecy, he had, in fact, helped it to come true.
This is similar to the story of Oedipus the King . Oedipus heard the prophecy that he would one day murder his father and marry his mother, and so fled from his presumed parents so as to avoid fulfilling the prophecy. Such an act seems noble and it was jolly bad luck that fate had decreed that Oedipus would turn out to be a foundling and his real parents were still out there for him to bump into.
But what is clever about Sophoclesâ dramatising of the myth is the way he introduces little details which reveal Oedipusâ character. The clues were already there that Oedipus was actually adopted: when he received the prophecy from the oracle, a drunk told him as much. But because the man was drunk, Oedipus didnât believe him.
But, as the Latin phrase has it, in vino veritas . Then, it is Oedipusâ hubris, his pride, that contributes to the altercation on the road between him and Laius, the man who turns out to be his real father: if Oedipus was less stubborn, he would have played the bigger man and stepped aside to let Laius pass.
What does all this mean, when we stop and analyse it in terms of the interplay between fate and personal actions in Oedipus the King ? It means that Sophocles was aware of something which governs all our lives. Call it âkarmaâ if you will, or fate, but it works even if we remove the supernatural framework into which the action of Oedipus the King is placed.
Our actions have consequences, but that doesnât mean that a particular action will lead to a particular consequence: it means that one action might cause something quite different to happen, which will nevertheless be linked in some way to our lives. A thief steals your wallet and you never see him, or your wallet, again. Did the criminal get away with it? Maybe.
Or maybe his habit of taking an intrusive interest in other peopleâs wallets will lead him, somewhere down the line, to getting what the ancient Greeks didnât call âhis comeuppanceâ. He wasnât punished for pilfering your possessions, but he will nevertheless receive his just deserts.
Oedipus kills Laius because he is a stubborn and angry man; in his anger and pride, he allows himself to forget the prophecy (or to believe himself safe if he kills this man who definitely isnât his father, no way ), and to kill another man. That one event will set in motion a chain of events that will see him married to his mother, the city over which he rules in the grip of plague, and â ultimately â Oedipus blinded and his wife/mother hanged.
Or perhaps thatâs to impose a modern reading onto a classical text which Sophocles himself would not recognise. Yet works of art are always opening themselves up to new readings which see them reflecting our changing and evolving moral beliefs, and that is perhaps why Oedipus the King remains a great play to read, watch, analyse, and discuss. There remains something unsettling about its plot structure and its ambiguous meaning, and that is what lends it its power.
Discover more from Interesting Literature
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Type your emailâŠ
7 thoughts on “A Summary and Analysis of Sophocles’ Oedipus the King”
Reblogged this on Writing hints and competitions and commented: Insight, the fate that launched a thousand clips
Wonderful analysis. Thank you. ~~dru~~
Thank you :)
- Pingback: A Short History of Detective Fiction | Interesting Literature
- Pingback: A Summary and Analysis of the âRumpelstiltskinâ Fairy Tale | Interesting Literature
- Pingback: A Short Summary of Arthur Miller’s ‘Tragedy and the Common Man’ – Interesting Literature
- Pingback: A Short Analysis of William Shakespeareâs Macbeth – Interesting Literature
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Continue reading
Literary Theory and Criticism
Home › Drama Criticism › Analysis of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex
Analysis of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex
By NASRULLAH MAMBROL on July 27, 2020 • ( 0 )
The place of the Oedipus Tyrannus in literature is something like that of the Mona Lisa in art. Everyone knows the story, the first detective story of Western literature; everyone who has read or seen it is drawn into its enigmas and moral dilemmas. It presents a kind of nightmare vision of a world suddenly turned upside down: a decent man discovers that he has unknowingly killed his father, married his mother, and sired children by her. It is a story that, as Aristotle says in the Poetics , makes one shudder with horror and feel pity just on hearing it. In Sophoclesâ hands, however, this ancient tale becomes a profound meditation on the questions of guilt and responsibility, the order (or disorder) of our world, and the nature of man. The play stands with the Book of Job, Hamlet, and King Lear as one of Western literatureâs most searching examinations of the problem of suffering.
âCharles Segal, Oedipus Tyrannus: Tragic Heroism and the Limits of Knowledge
No other drama has exerted a longer or stronger hold on the imagination than Sophoclesâ Oedipus the King (also known as Oedipus Tyrannus or Oedipus Rex ). Tragic drama that is centered on the dilemma of a single central character largely begins with Sophocles and is exemplified by his Oedipus, arguably the most influential play ever written. The most famous of all Greek dramas, Sophoclesâ play, supported by Aristotle in the Poetics, set the standard by which tragedy has been measured for nearly two-and-a-half millennia. For Aristotle, Sophoclesâ play featured the ideal tragic hero in Oedipus, a man of âgreat repute and good fortune,â whose fall, coming from his horrifying discovery that he has killed his father and married his mother, is masterfully arranged to elicit tragedyâs proper cathartic mixture of pity and terror. The playâs relentless exploration of human nature, destiny, and suffering turns an ancient tale of a manâs shocking history into one of the core human myths. Oedipus thereby joins a select group of fictional characters, including Odysseus, Faust, Don Juan, and Don Quixote, that have entered our collective consciousness as paradigms of humanity and the human condition. As classical scholar Bernard Knox has argued, âSophoclesâ Oedipus is not only the greatest creation of a major poet and the classic representative figure of his age: he is also one of a long series of tragic protagonists who stand as symbols of human aspiration and despair before the characteristic dilemma of Western civilizationâthe problem of manâs true stature, his proper place in the universe.â
For nearly 2,500 years Sophoclesâ play has claimed consideration as dramaâs most perfect and most profound achievement. Julius Caesar wrote an adaptation; Nero allegedly acted the part of the blind Oedipus. First staged in a European theater in 1585, Oedipus has been continually performed ever since and reworked by such dramatists as Pierre Corneille, John Dryden, Voltaire, William Butler Yeats, AndrĂ© Gide, and Jean Cocteau. The French neoclassical tragedian Jean Racine asserted that Oedipus was the ideal tragedy, while D. H. Lawrence regarded it as âthe finest drama of all time.â Sigmund Freud discovered in the play the key to understanding manâs deepest and most repressed sexual and aggressive impulses, and the so-called Oedipus complex became one of the founding myths of psychoanalysis. Oedipus has served as a crucial mirror by which each subsequent era has been able to see its own reflection and its understanding of the mystery of human existence.
If Aeschylus is most often seen as the great originator of ancient Greek tragedy and Euripides is viewed as the great outsider and iconoclast, it is Sophocles who occupies the central position as classical tragedyâs technical master and the ageâs representative figure over a lifetime that coincided with the rise and fall of Athensâs greatness as a political and cultural power in the fifth century b.c. Sophocles was born in 496 near Athens in Colonus, the legendary final resting place of the exiled Oedipus. At the age of 16, Sophocles, an accomplished dancer and lyre player, was selected to lead the celebration of the victory over the Persians at the battle of Salamis, the event that ushered in Athensâs golden age. He died in 406, two years before Athensâs fall to Sparta, which ended nearly a century of Athenian supremacy and cultural achievement. Very much at the center of Athenian public life, Sophocles served as a treasurer of state and a diplomat and was twice elected as a general. A lay priest in the cult of a local deity, Sophocles also founded a literary association and was an intimate of such prominent men of letters as Ion of Chios, Herodotus, and Archelaus. Urbane, garrulous, and witty, Sophocles was remembered fondly by his contemporaries as possessing all the admired qualities of balance and tranquillity. Nicknamed âthe Beeâ for his âhoneyedâ style of fl owing eloquenceâthe highest compliment the Greeks could bestow on a poet or speakerâSophocles was regarded as the tragic Homer.
In marked contrast to his secure and stable public role and private life, Sophoclesâ plays orchestrate a disturbing challenge to assurance and certainty by pitting vulnerable and fallible humanity against the inexorable forces of nature and destiny. Sophocles began his career as a playwright in 468 b.c. with a first-prize victory over Aeschylus in the Great, or City, Dionysia, the annual Athenian drama competition. Over the next 60 years he produced more than 120 plays (only seven have survived intact), winning first prize at the Dionysia 24 times and never earning less than second place, making him unquestionably the most successful and popular playwright of his time. It is Sophocles who introduced the third speaking actor to classical drama, creating the more complex dramatic situations and deepened psychological penetration through interpersonal relationships and dialogue. âSophocles turned tragedy inward upon the principal actors,â classicist Richard Lattimore has observed, âand drama becomes drama of character.â Favoring dramatic action over narration, Sophocles brought offstage action onto the stage, emphasized dialogue rather than lengthy, undramatic monologues, and purportedly introduced painted scenery. Also of note, Sophocles replaced the connected trilogies of Aeschylus with self-contained plays on different subjects at the same contest, establishing the norm that has continued in Western drama with its emphasis on the intensity and unity of dramatic action. At their core, Sophoclesâ tragedies are essentially moral and religious dramas pitting the tragic hero against unalterable fate as defined by universal laws, particular circumstances, and individual temperament. By testing his characters so severely, Sophocles orchestrated adversity into revelations that continue to evoke an audienceâs capacity for wonder and compassion.
The story of Oedipus was part of a Theban cycle of legends that was second only to the stories surrounding the Trojan War as a popular subject for Greek literary treatment. Thirteen different Greek dramatists, including Aeschylus and Euripides, are known to have written plays on the subject of Oedipus and his progeny. Sophoclesâ great innovation was to turn Oedipusâs horrifying circumstances into a drama of self-discovery that probes the mystery of selfhood and human destiny.
The play opens with Oedipus secure and respected as the capable ruler of Thebes having solved the riddle of the Sphinx and gained the throne and Thebesâs widowed queen, Jocasta, as his reward. Plague now besets the city, and Oedipus comes to Thebesâs rescue once again when, after learning from the oracle of Apollo that the plague is a punishment for the murder of his predecessor, Laius, he swears to discover and bring the murderer to justice. The play, therefore, begins as a detective story, with the key question âWho killed Laius?â as the initial mystery. Oedipus initiates the first in a seemingly inexhaustible series of dramatic ironies as the detective who turns out to be his own quarry. Oedipusâs judgment of banishment for Laiusâs murderer seals his own fate. Pledged to restore Thebes to health, Oedipus is in fact the source of its affliction. Oedipusâs success in discovering Laiusâs murderer will be his own undoing, and the seemingly percipient, riddle-solving Oedipus will only see the truth about himself when he is blind. To underscore this point, the blind seer Teiresias is summoned. He is reluctant to tell what he knows, but Oedipus is adamant: âNo man, no place, nothing will escape my gaze. / I will not stop until I know it all.â Finally goaded by Oedipus to reveal that Oedipus himself is âthe killer youâre searching forâ and the plague that afflicts Thebes, Teiresias introduces the playâs second mystery, âWho is Oedipus?â
You have eyes to see with, But you do not see yourself, you do not see The horror shadowing every step of your life, . . . Who are your father and mother? Can you tell me?
Oedipus rejects Teiresiasâs horrifying answer to this questionâthat Oedipus has killed his own father and has become a âsower of seed where your father has sowedââas part of a conspiracy with Jocastaâs brother Creon against his rule. In his treatment of Teiresias and his subsequent condemning of Creon to death, Oedipus exposes his pride, wrath, and rush to judgment, character flaws that alloy his evident strengths of relentless determination to learn the truth and fortitude in bearing the consequences. Jocasta comes to her brotherâs defense, while arguing that not all oracles can be believed. By relating the circumstances of Laiusâs death, Jocasta attempts to demonstrate that Oedipus could not be the murderer while ironically providing Oedipus with the details that help to prove the case of his culpability. In what is a marvel of ironic plot construction, each step forward in answering the questions surrounding the murder and Oedipusâs parentage takes Oedipus a step back in time toward full disclosure and self-discovery.
As Oedipus is made to shift from self-righteous authority to doubt, a messenger from Corinth arrives with news that Oedipusâs supposed father, Poly-bus, is dead. This intelligence seems again to disprove the oracle that Oedipus is fated to kill his father. Oedipus, however, still is reluctant to return home for fear that he could still marry his mother. To relieve Oedipusâs anxiety, the messenger reveals that he himself brought Oedipus as an infant to Polybus. Like Jocasta whose evidence in support of Oedipusâs innocence turns into confirmation of his guilt, the messenger provides intelligence that will connect Oedipus to both Laius and Jocasta as their son and as his fatherâs killer. The messengerâs intelligence produces the crucial recognition for Jocasta, who urges Oedipus to cease any further inquiry. Oedipus, however, persists, summoning the herdsman who gave the infant to the messenger and was coincidentally the sole survivor of the attack on Laius. The herdsmanâs eventual confirmation of both the facts of Oedipusâs birth and Laiusâs murder produces the playâs staggering climax. Aristotle would cite Sophoclesâ simultaneous con-junction of Oedipusâs recognition of his identity and guilt with his reversal of fortuneâcondemned by his own words to banishment and exile as Laiusâs murdererâas the ideal artful arrangement of a dramaâs plot to produce the desired cathartic pity and terror.
The play concludes with an emphasis on what Oedipus will now do after he knows the truth. No tragic hero has fallen further or faster than in the real time of Sophoclesâ drama in which the time elapsed in the play coincides with the performance time. Oedipus is stripped of every illusion of his authority, control, righteousness, and past wisdom and is forced to contend with a shame that is impossible to expiateâpatricide and incestual relations with his motherâin a world lacking either justice or alleviation from suffering. Oedipusâs heroic grandeur, however, grows in his diminishment. Fundamentally a victim of circumstances, innocent of intentional sin whose fate was preordained before his birth, Oedipus refuses the consolation of blamelessness that victimization confers, accepting in full his guilt and self-imposed sentence as an outcast, criminal, and sinner. He blinds himself to confirm the moral shame that his actions, unwittingly or not, have provoked. It is Oedipusâs capacity to endure the revelation of his sin, his nature, and his fate that dominates the playâs conclusion. Oedipusâs greatest strengthsâhis determination to know the truth and to accept what he learnsâsets him apart as one of the most pitiable and admired of tragic heroes. âThe closing note of the tragedy,â Knox argues, âis a renewed insistence on the heroic nature of Oedipus; the play ends as it began, with the greatness of the hero. But it is a different kind of greatness. It is now based on knowledge, not, as before on ignorance.â The now-blinded Oedipus has been forced to see and experience the impermanence of good fortune, the reality of unimaginable moral shame, and a cosmic order that is either perverse in its calculated cruelty or chaotically random in its designs, in either case defeating any human need for justice and mercy.
The Chorus summarizes the harsh lesson of heroic defeat that the play so majestically dramatizes:
Look and learn all citizens of Thebes. This is Oedipus. He, who read the famous riddle, and we hailed chief of men, All envied his power, glory, and good fortune. Now upon his head the sea of disaster crashes down. Mortality is manâs burden. Keep your eyes fixed on your last day. Call no man happy until he reaches it, and finds rest from suffering.
Few plays have dealt so unflinchingly with existential truths or have as bravely defined human heroism in the capacity to see, suffer, and endure.
Greek Tragedy Lecture Series
Oedipus Rex Ebook PDF (16 MB)
Share this:
Categories: Drama Criticism , Literature
Tags: Analysis Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Bibliography Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Character Study Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Criticism Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Essays Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Literary Criticism , Notes Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Oedipus , Oedipus Rex Analysis , Oedipus Rex Criticism , Oedipus Rex Essay , Oedipus Rex Guide , Oedipus Rex Lecture , Oedipus Rex PDF , Oedipus Rex Summary , Oedipus Rex Themes , Oedipus the King , Oedipus Tyrannus , Plot Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Simple Analysis Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Sophocles , Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex Feminism , Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex Psychoanalysis , Study Guides Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Summary Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Synopsis Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Themes Of Sophoclesâ Oedipus Rex , Tragedy , World Literature
Related Articles
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Oedipus the King
Table of contents.
Tiresias says to Oedipus, âCreon is not your downfall, no, you are your own.â What is the extent of Oedipusâ guilt in his own downfall?
- âOedipus the King demonstrates that the quest for truth only leads to self-destruction.â Discuss.
- What does the play have to say about fate and free will?
- âThe play is about Oedipusâ search for his identity.â Discuss.
- âWhat should a man fear? Itâs all about chance, / chance rules our lives.â Discuss Jocastaâs philosophy about life.
- Discuss the dual role of the Chorus.
- What do the choral odes have to say about the relationship between humans and the gods?
- What are Oedipusâ feelings about family?
- Evidence Bank
Oedipus the King is a classic Greek tragedy by Sophocles about the downfall of Oedipus, a heroic yet ill-fated character who was prophesied to slay his father and marry his mother. Oedipus finds himself caught in a dilemma between his determination to unwind the tangled threads of his history, or avoid undermining everything he knows about his life. The premise of the ancient play reminds audiences of the cruel nature of fate and the importance of making good decisions. Yet Oedipus himself is a complex character who does his best to exercise free choice within the restraints of his fate, which lends itself to the argument surrounding the extent of his guilt in his eventual downfall. To a large extent, Oedipus is responsible for his horrible actions that drive him to fulfil the prophecy given to him at birth, such as his violent nature which drives him to slay his father, as well as his incessant drive to seek the truth about himself. Yet as the ancient Greeks would have it, despite taking extensive manoeuvres to avoid his terrible future, Oedipus may have been a prisoner of his own fate and thus remain guiltless.
Oedipus the King, a timeless Greek tragedy penned by Sophocles, unfolds the tragic descent of Oedipus, a heroic figure ensnared in the ominous prophecy of patricide and matrimony with his mother/incest. Confronted with the formidable choice between unraveling the intricacies of his lineage and preserving the foundation of his perceived reality, Oedipus grapples with a profound dilemma. The narrative serves as a poignant reminder of the inexorable cruelty of destiny and the consequential significance of judicious decision-making.Oedipus, a character of intricate depth, endeavors to wield volition amidst the constricting threads of his foretold destiny, thereby fueling debates about the degree of culpability in his eventual downfall. While Oedipus bears considerable responsibility for the grievous deeds that propel him toward the fulfillment of his preordained fateâsuch as his proclivity for violence leading to the slaying of his parentsâhe also exhibits an unwavering determination to unveil the veracity of his existence.Yet, adhering to the ancient Greek ethos, Oedipus, despite his concerted efforts to circumvent the ominous prophecy, remains ensnared in the inexorable web of fate, prompting contemplation about his potential innocence. In essence, Oedipus, despite his extensive manoeuvres to avert a calamitous destiny, emerges as a captive of his predetermined path, thereby challenging conventional notions of guilt and culpability.
Oedipusâ violent and aggressive nature, as shown by his various impulsive actions, can be said to be a defining factor which led him to the actions of his downfall. Even considering the audienceâs knowledge of his horrible fate, there is no question that his nature lends itself to his questionable actions. For example, Oedipus testifies to Jocasta that the man he killed, Laius, was âaccompanied by a heraldâ, thus announcing to the world that he was a king. Yet Oedipus, despite having been raised as royalty himself, does not hold himself back in the slaughter of Laius, the herald, and multiple others. This can be interpreted in several ways: either his impulsivity and pride led him to rashly kill Laius and his followers, thus cementing his guilt in his own fate, or that the threads of fate led him to make that decision in that moment. Either way, there is little doubt that it was simply part of Oedipusâ nature, as there is little other justification for his violent actions. In a similar way, his dogged determination to uncover the truth of his past turns him hostile and abusive, revealing his hubris; when Tiresias does tell him the truth about what he seeks, he does not listen as he is consumed by paranoia. His aberrant character flaws are thus determinant of his guilt in his own downfall.
Oedipus’ propensity for violence and aggression, manifested through impulsive actions, emerges as a pivotal factor contributing to his eventual downfall. Despite the audience’s awareness of his inexorable fate, there is an unequivocal acknowledgment that his inherent nature propels him towards morally ambiguous deeds. Notably, Oedipus, while recounting to Jocasta the slaying of Laius, explicitly highlights the regal stature of his victim, accompanied by a herald. Paradoxically, even though Oedipus himself was nurtured in royal surroundings, he fails to restrain his carnage, perpetrating the ruthless murder of Laius, the herald, and others. This dichotomy invites interpretations that either his impetuosity and pride precipitated the hasty annihilation, cementing his culpability in his tragic destiny, or that the inexorable threads of fate coerced him into that fateful decision.Moreover, Oedipus’ unwavering commitment to unraveling the truth of his origins transforms him into a hostile and abusive figure, laying bare the depths of his hubris. When Tiresias imparts the veracious revelation he seeks, Oedipus, ensnared by paranoia, remains deaf to reason. His anomalous character flaws thus serve as decisive elements substantiating his complicity in the tragic unraveling of his own fate.
In addition to his violent nature, Oedipusâ incessant seeking of the truth also leads him to his downfall. As the play opens, the audience learns that Oedipus is at the height of his success, as he had already become a great ruler of Thebes, revered by many for âdefeating the Sphinxâ. This only lends itself to demonstrate the great downfall that he will face at the hands of his own curiosity. Later, when Jocasta tells the tale of Laiusâ death to Oedipus, he begins to doubt himself, in that he is indeed the murderer he is seeking. However, despite understanding the consequences, this does nothing to stop the momentum of his investigation. Oedipus refuses to consider Jocastaâs advice that he âlive at random, best we canâ and according to chance. Instead, he is so fixated on getting to the bottom of the truth by calling for the old shepherd who saved him when he was a baby. Oedipus is aware of the consequences, that âif he refers to one man, one alone, / clearly the scales come down on me: / I am guiltyâ. Even as the shepherd, like Tiresias, demonstrates reluctance to tell Oedipus what he knows, he insists that the truth must come out. Moreover, when Jocasta collapses in despair, Oedipus remains fervent in his determination to discover his true identity, proclaiming that âI must know it all, / must see the truth at lastâ. In the end, it is this unwavering confidence and determination for the truth that ultimately leads him to his downfall.
However, despite these interpretations, it can also be said that Oedipus was merely a prisoner of his own fate, indicating that all the questionable actions he took were merely part of his destiny, no matter how hard he tried to avoid it. Through this interpretation, Oedipus is guiltless as there was no way to avoid his fate. Many attempts to avoid Oedipusâ tragic fate appear in the play, yet he still fulfilled it regardless. Jocasta and Laius cast him out as a mere infant; Oedipus exiles himself from his adopted parents in fear that ill would befall them (and not his birth parents). Yet it is fate that drives him towards Thebes and to the crossroads where he slew Laius, where there was no reason to kill Laius, but he was driven to do so anyway. Fate rewards him cruelly with Jocasta as a wife after besting the Sphinx. Lastly, fate drives him to pursue the truth of his past, driving home the final punishment of exile and blindness set by himself. There appeared the illusion of free will in his choices, but Oedipus was ultimately driven to make horrible choices which resulted in the fulfillment of the prophecy. Hence, Sophocles presents the cruel reality that even though characters may take extensive manoeuvres to avoid committing the crimes of their fate, they will be compelled to commit abhorrent acts in order to fulfill their destinies.
Overall, Oedipus himself is a complex character: the extent of his guilt depends on how much the audience places value on his personal choices or the prison of his fate. It is true that his nature lends itself to the interpretation of his own guilt in his actions. However, given the context of ancient Greece where individuals were commonly understood to be prisoner of their own fate, there may have been no way for him to avoid the consequences. Hence, while Oedipus was ill-fated from birth, Sophocles aimed to imbue audiences with the moral that oneâs choices are highly important to the outcome of their lives.
â Oedipus the King demonstrates that the quest for truth only leads to self-destruction. â Discuss.
Oedipus the King – Sophocles – Oedipus Rex Analysis, Summary, Story
(tragedy, greek, c. 429 bce, 1,530 lines).
Introduction | Synopsis | Analysis | Resources
â Oedipus the King â (Gr: â Oidipous Tyrannos â ; Lat: â Oedipus Rex â ) is a tragedy by the ancient Greek playwright Sophocles , first performed in about 429 BCE . It was the second of Sophocles ‘ three Theban plays to be produced, but it comes first in the internal chronology (followed by âOedipus at Colonusâ and then âAntigoneâ ).
It follows the story of King Oedipus of Thebes as he discovers that he has unwittingly killed his own father, Laius, and married his own mother, Jocasta . Over the centuries, it has come to be regarded by many as the Greek tragedy par excellence and certainly as the summit of Sophocles â achievements.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Read a sample prompt and A+ essay response on The Oedipus Plays.
Oedipus the King might also be called the first detective story in Western literature. Yet how well do we know Sophocles' play? And what does a closer analysis of its plot features and themes reveal?
From a general summary to chapter summaries to explanations of famous quotes, the SparkNotes The Oedipus Plays Study Guide has everything you need to ace quizzes, tests, and essays.
No other drama has exerted a longer or stronger hold on the imagination than Sophocles' Oedipus the King (also known as Oedipus Tyrannus or Oedipus Rex). Tragic drama that is centered on the dilemma of a single central character largely begins with Sophocles and is exemplified by his Oedipus, arguably the most influential play ever written. The most famous of all Greek dramas, Sophocles ...
Oedipus the King, a timeless Greek tragedy penned by Sophocles, unfolds the tragic descent of Oedipus, a heroic figure ensnared in the ominous prophecy of patricide and matrimony with his mother/incest. Confronted with the formidable choice between unraveling the intricacies of his lineage and preserving the foundation of his perceived reality ...
Oedipus Rex, also known as Oedipus the King, is a play authored by Sophocles. It was first performed in 429 BC in Athens, Greece (Knox 133). The play is the second of several Sophocles' plays, and has been regarded as an excellent piece by many scholars (Belfiore 176). This report will highlight about the author, discuss the setting of, and ...
Introduction - Oedipus Story. "Oedipus the King" (Gr: "Oidipous Tyrannos"; Lat: "Oedipus Rex") is a tragedy by the ancient Greek playwright Sophocles, first performed in about 429 BCE. It was the second of Sophocles ' three Theban plays to be produced, but it comes first in the internal chronology (followed by "Oedipus at ...
Read our complete notes on "Oedipus Rex", a famous play by Sophocles, covering Oedipus Rex summary, themes, and detailed analysis.
Oedipus as an Aristotelian Tragic Hero In 335 BCE, Aristotle published Poetics, a tract in which he describes the ideal form and function of a Greek tragedy. In Aristotle's eyes, a good tragic ...
Oedipus the King is considered Sophocles's greatest work and is cited by Aristotle as the exemplar text of all Greek tragedy. Sophocles's use of dramatic irony intensifies the empathetic relationship between the audience and the characters on stage. The most famous part of the story, in which Oedipus fulfills a prophecy to kill his father ...
The play "Oedipus the King" is a tragedy written by Sophocles around 429 BC. The play tells the story of Oedipus, the King of Thebes, who unwittingly fulfills a prophecy that he would kill his father and marry his mother. The play explores themes of fate and free will, blindness, and knowledge vs. ignorance, making it a relevant piece of ...
From a general summary to chapter summaries to explanations of famous quotes, the SparkNotes The Oedipus Plays Study Guide has everything you need to ace quizzes, tests, and essays.
Oedipus the King is a character of immense complexity and depth, with a range of traits, flaws, and psychological nuances that make him a timeless and compelling figure in literature. Through a comprehensive character analysis, we have gained valuable insights into Oedipus' background, personality, flaws, and impact on the plot of the play.
Dive deep into Sophocles' The Oedipus Trilogy with extended analysis, commentary, and discussion
Oedipus the King by Sophocles Literature Analysis Essay. Oedipus is swift and confident throughout the play. He cross-examines Creon, asks for Tiresias, makes threats about sending Creon and Tiresias to exile, asks to see the servant who ran off from the assault on Laius, and finally requests to be banished. He is always in motion, apparently ...
Oedipus Rex is arguably the most important tragedy in all of classical literature. Ever since Aristotle used it in his Poetics in order to define the qualities of a successful tragedy, its ...
Oedipus Hubris Analysis. The story of Oedipus, as told by the ancient Greek playwright Sophocles, is one of the most enduring and compelling tales of hubris and its consequences. The character of Oedipus, a proud and determined king, is a prime example of the destructive power of hubris. In this essay, we will explore the various aspects of ...
For a study guide on Sophocles's Oedipus Rex, focusing on literary devices and in-depth analysis, look no further! đ Dive into the tragic world of Oedipus, where fate and free will collide, with our comprehensive guide. Explore the genius of Sophocles through themes, character breakdowns, and the masterful use of literary devices that have captivated audiences for centuries. Unlock the ...
The plot is thoroughly integrated with the characterization of Oedipus, for it is he who impels the action forward in his concern for Thebes, his personal rashness, and his ignorance of his past.
The Character Oedipus Analysis. Sophocles' "Oedipus Rex" is a classic Greek tragedy that tells the story of Oedipus, a nobleman who becomes the king of Thebes and unwittingly fulfills a prophecy that leads to his tragic downfall. In this essay, we will explore how the character of Oedipus serves as a tragic hero whose excessive pride and ...
Summary: A strong thesis statement for an essay on the tragedy Oedipus Rex could focus on the inevitability of fate, the consequences of hubris, or the interplay between free will and destiny ...
A detailed description and in-depth analysis of Oedipus in The Oedipus Plays.
Oedipus. Extended Character Analysis. Oedipus is often considered the quintessential Aristotelian tragic hero. In Oedipus Rex, he begins the play at a high point as the benevolent and beloved King ...