environmental sustainability research paper pdf

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 27 August 2024

Charting sustainable urban development through a systematic review of SDG11 research

• Abdulaziz I. Almulhim   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-7219 1 ,
• Ayyoob Sharifi   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-8613 2 ,
• Yusuf A. Aina   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-9865 3 ,
• Shakil Ahmad 4 ,
• Luca Mora 5 , 6 ,
• Walter Leal Filho 7 , 8 &
• Ismaila Rimi Abubakar   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-2302 9  

Nature Cities ( 2024 ) Cite this article

1553 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Environmental studies
• Social policy

The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11 underscores the imperative of creating inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable cities and communities by 2030. Here we employ bibliometric techniques to assess the evolving landscape of SDG11 research. Using a comprehensive dataset of over 21,000 scholarly publications, we investigate publication trends, thematic focus areas, authorship patterns, keyword co-occurrences and citation networks related to SDG11 research. The results reveal a consistent increase in research output, reflecting the growing global interest in urban sustainability studies. We identify influential authors, organizations and countries shaping the research landscape, highlighting existing global collaborative networks and emerging research hubs. Core thematic areas emphasize critical topics and interdisciplinary connections. Citation networks underscore the impacts of disseminating research outputs, including seminal works. This study offers insights for policymakers, academics and practitioners to align their collective efforts toward sustainable, inclusive and climate-resilient urban development. Moreover, it advances SDG11 by noting opportunities for further research, knowledge dissemination and international collaboration.

Similar content being viewed by others

A big data approach to assess progress towards Sustainable Development Goals for cities of varying sizes

Examining the unsustainable relationship between SDG performance, ecological footprint and international spillovers

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?

The growing interest in sustainable urban development is driven by challenges posed by urbanization, socioeconomic activities and environmental issues 1 . Urban areas contribute 80% of the world’s gross domestic product 2 , but also account for around 75% of global resource consumption, 65% of energy use and over 70% of carbon emissions 3 . The ecological footprint of urban environments, which measures the resources required to sustain socioeconomic activities, has been increasing 4 , 5 , and the global urban extent is projected to double by 2030 6 . Similarly, the global urban population is projected to reach 68% by 2050 7 , which could surpass the capacity of most urban areas 8 . Africa and Asia will host most of the future urban populations despite housing and infrastructure inadequacies 7 . Rapid urbanization, poverty and climate change (CC) further intensify the vulnerability of urban dwellers 9 .

Sustainable urban development aims to balance economic production, environmental protection and social inclusiveness. It emerged as a response to the critique of modernist views that prioritized physical appearance and order in cities over context, equity and inclusion 6 . Due to the limited progress in achieving the Millennium Development Goals, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were established in 2015 to ensure that no country is left behind in achieving sustainable development by 2030 10 . Many of the SDGs are closely related to urban settings, where sustainability challenges are complex and interwoven 11 . SDG11 specifically focuses on urban challenges and aims to make ‘cities and human settlements inclusive, safe resilient and sustainable’ by reducing the negative effects of urban development while improving socioeconomic development 10 .

The importance of SDG11 stems from the principles of inclusive, safe and resilient city. An inclusive city is characterized by the idea that all individuals, irrespective of their economic status, gender, race, ethnicity or religion, have the ability and empowerment to actively engage in the social, economic and political opportunities available within urban environments 6 . It seeks to address environmental racism and promote inclusive and fair urban development through social justice and equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens. In such a city, everyone is afforded equal access and participation in the diverse aspects that cities provide. On the other hand, a safe city refers to a city that possesses the capacity to provide protection and security against potential dangers, harm or risks, while a resilient city denotes a city’s ability to recover and restore its fundamental functions and structures following natural disasters and crises caused by human activities 6 , 8 . SDG11 is significant because it aims to ensure that cities develop sustainably.

However, SDG11 has been criticized for its limited emphasis on urban inequalities, decentralization and funding for local authorities 6 . Other challenges include localizing the universal indicators 12 , governance issues 13 , data accessibility and comparability 14 and smart city development 12 , 15 . Nevertheless, SDG11 serves as a platform for directing and monitoring urban development, fostering socioeconomic development and ensuring equity, inclusion and environmental protection 16 . Therefore, it is crucial to assess the literature on progress toward SDG11 targets 10 , especially at the halfway point to the target year, to inform interventions necessary for their achievement 17 .

While SDG11 has attracted significant global research attention 18 , comprehensive reviews of SDG11 literature are limited. Existing studies have primarily focused on assessing all the SDGs 19 , 20 , which obscures specific challenges and makes it difficult to track progress or design targeted interventions for individual goals. Recent work has highlighted the insufficient achievement of the SDGs and the need for transformative governance and participatory approaches 21 . Other studies have underscored the gap between research and policies, the underutilization of cities as pivotal arenas for achieving SDGs 22 and the lack of indicators to measure progress toward implementing SDGs 15 . Some studies have assessed SDGs’ implementation in specific region 17 , their impacts on addressing risks 23 and crises 1 , and their implications for health and well-being 24 , environmental research 25 and private sector involvement 26 . Most of the SDG research emanates from developed countries, showing a gap in the coverage of developing countries 27 . The few SDG11 studies in the Global South have narrow focus. While one paper investigated the impact of SDG11 on forest-based livelihoods 28 , another study researched the challenges of SDG11 implementation using a single-country experience 6 . Therefore, an in-depth and broad review of SDG11 literature is necessary to bridge this knowledge gap and identify key challenges and opportunities as well as potential pathways for achieving the targets set in SDG11.

Therefore, this research aims to assess the SDG11 research trends and themes using a bibliometric technique. It is the first global and comprehensive scientometric study on the SDG11 domain. By focusing on research conducted since the formulation of the SDGs, the study addresses the following research questions: (1) what are the global trends in SDG11 research? (2) How has the thematic focus of SDG11 research evolved over time? (3) What are the challenges and priority areas for SDG11 research? The contributions of the study to theory and practice are to:

Identify significant thematic areas and trends in SDG11 research since the promulgation of the SDGs, which can inform researchers, policymakers and practitioners about the current state of knowledge within the field and highlight priority areas for SDG11 research.

Map research clusters, knowledge sharing and collaboration patterns, thereby providing insights into the dynamics of research networks and facilitating the formulation of strategies to foster research excellence, interdisciplinary and international collaborations and the effective allocating of research resources.

Underscore the knowledge gaps, emerging topics and challenges within SDG11 research, offering evidence-based insights to align urban development initiatives with SDG11 research frontiers, enhance the efficacy of interventions and contribute to the development of inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable cities.

SDG11 research trends

Research on SDG11 has significantly grown in terms of annual publications and citations since 2016, indicating a rising interest in this field (Fig. 1 ). The number of publications has increased by 1.3-fold, and this upward trajectory is expected to continue. Notable emerging research areas include the institutionalization of SDGs within local and global settings 18 and the impact of smart cities on advancing the SDGs 12 , 15 . Previously, studies on the epistemology and challenges of urban population growth were prevalent 29 . However, SDG11 research has now evolved into multidisciplinary fields, driven by heightened attention to urban challenges such as CC, urbanization and population growth.

A total of 21,153 articles were published, receiving 229,182 citations. The number of publications rose from 9,238 in period 1 (2016–2019) to 11,915 in period 2 (2020–2022).

Source data

The increasing trend in SDG11 publications can be attributed to several factors, including the desire to improve institutional rankings, a supportive research environment, investments and endowments, faculty promotion requirements and advancements in information and communication technology. There are also socioeconomic factors, such as increasing urbanization rates and gross domestic product, urban expansion and transformation, a deeper understanding of urban dynamics and challenges. Additionally, the policy environments in different countries can influence academic interests and research in urban studies, shaping research priorities and collaborations. Other contributing factors include research challenges faced by low-income countries and research support by governments, the private sector, international development agencies and scholars, all focusing on sustainable urban development.

SDG11 research is further propelled by recent international summits and collaborations that highlight the urgency of protecting the ecosystem and ensuring human safety 1 . Since 2015, CC issues have received greater attention due to key factors. The adoption of the Paris Agreement raised awareness and urgency for action on CC, resulting in a greater focus on related issues in various sectors, including urban planning and policy 13 . Scientific consensus on CC impacts and the role of human activities has also strengthened over the years, with Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessments emphasizing the significance of cities in addressing CC 23 . As a result, CC considerations are increasingly integrated into research, policy and planning processes.

Urban planning and development strategies have prioritized climate mitigation and adaptation measures, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting renewable energy, enhancing resilience to extreme weather events and incorporating green infrastructure. The focus on CC has accelerated the transition toward low-carbon and resilient cities, with efforts directed toward sustainable transportation, energy-efficient buildings, green spaces and climate-responsive infrastructure 6 . Collaboration and international cooperation are essential in addressing climate change, with cities and countries sharing best practices, knowledge and resources to develop and implement climate action plans 24 . Initiatives such as the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group facilitate knowledge exchange and collective action among cities 30 . The increased attention to CC signifies a shift toward more sustainable and resilient urban development, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, adapt to climate risks and promote equitable and sustainable urban environments.

Thematic focus of SDG11 research

There is an imbalance in the attention given to research themes within SDG11 as revealed by co-occurrence map (Supplementary Fig. 1 ). The dominant themes are affordable housing (SDG11.1), urban transport (SDG11.2), policy and governance (SDG11.3) and access to public spaces (SDG11.7). Housing affordability issues have consistently remained a focal point in SDG11 research, with urban studies, policy development and community-driven efforts for finding solutions to these complex challenges 30 , 31 . These issues were highlighted in Habitat I (Vancouver, 1976), which emphasized the importance of shifting governance and planning paradigms to develop policies and strategies to address rapid urbanization challenges, including shelter shortages and urban inequalities, and promote affordable housing options 30 , 32 . Habitat I has laid the foundation for subsequent global efforts and policy frameworks, such as Habitat II (Istanbul, 1996) and the New Urban Agenda, which continue to prioritize housing as a pivotal component of sustainable urban development. The persistent focus on affordable housing shows that cities still face many challenges in providing adequate housing for all 30 .

Urban policy and governance are other significant terms, indicating scholarly focus on strategies for promoting inclusive and sustainable urban development, enhancing participatory, integrated and sustainable urban planning and management. However, many cities lack the capacity to address urban inequalities, provide adequate housing 31 , public spaces and other urban services, which disproportionately affect women and racial minorities 30 . Moreover, urban redevelopment practices that lead to gentrification exacerbate existing inequalities 32 . Governance-based approaches seek to improve collaboration between public agencies and civil society to prioritize the implementation of urban planning strategies that enhance livability standards while addressing challenges such as CC and sustainability 30 .

Urban transport, which is related to SDG11.2 aiming to ensure safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all, has emerged as a key research theme. Important issues related to mobility, transportation and urban form include increased automobile dependence amid growing urbanization and suburbanization, challenges faced by public transit systems, growing awareness of environmental concerns, shift toward sustainable and multimodal transportation, transit-oriented development, integration of technology in transportation systems and the relationship between transportation and urban densification, compact development, CC adaptation and resilience, equity and social inclusion, and shifts in policy and governance approaches 1 , 6 , 11 . This theme also emphasizes the importance of walkability, public transit infrastructure and their role in enhancing transportation accessibility and influencing mode choice 33 . The transportation cluster also suggests that improving accessibility through urban form and built environment interventions can impact the travel behavior of urban residents and offer cobenefits for human health and environmental sustainability 24 . Incorporating such cobenefits in SDG11.2 could provide more incentives for access to safe efficient, equitable and sustainable transport infrastructure and systems in cities.

The implications of urbanization and land-use changes for sustainability, resilience and CC adaptation and mitigation in cities are also major themes. SDG11.6 aims to reduce the environmental impacts of cities, particularly in relation to air pollution and waste. The literature suggests that regulating urban growth 6 , controlling land-use changes, conserving biodiversity 27 and promoting green infrastructure are essential for achieving this target 34 . These actions, when implemented within integrated planning frameworks, can also reduce vulnerability, enhance resilience and contribute to progress in CC adaptation and mitigation, as emphasized in SDG11.5 (ref. 6 ). Such integrated frameworks should recognize the interconnections between various urban systems, including water, food, energy, waste and transportation, to promote sustainable and resilient urban development 35 . Cities are adopting strategies to reduce their carbon footprint, enhance energy efficiency and prepare for climate risks.

Smart cities and innovation enabled by information and communication technologies have increasingly been utilized to tackle urban development challenges and facilitate innovative and transformative urban governance mechanisms that contribute to the SDGs 15 . The rapid development and integration of digital technologies, such as the Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, big data analytics and sensor networks, have opened new possibilities for improving urban services, infrastructure and quality of life 33 . Smart cities leverage these technologies to enhance efficiency, connectivity and sustainability. The interest in smart cities stems from the recognition that technology can play a transformative role in addressing urban challenges, improving quality of life, promoting sustainability and fostering economic growth 12 , 36 . However, it is important to ensure that smart city initiatives are inclusive, equitable and responsive to the needs and aspirations of all residents.

Comparing the co-occurrence maps of period 1 and period 2 reveals limited changes in key thematic areas, despite the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic during period 2 (Fig. 2 ). The key thematic areas in period 2, including urban governance and policy, transportation, urban sustainability and resilience, and urbanization and urban growth, remain consistent with period 1, indicating the continued relevance of these topics in research, albeit with potential expansions. However, a closer analysis of the clusters reveals that COVID-19 has emerged as a new area of SDG11 research in period 2, as attention has shifted toward adapting to the pandemic’s detrimental effects on cities. The pandemic has triggered paradigm shifts in various SDG11 domains, including public health, remote work, digitalization, vulnerabilities, inequalities, resilience, sustainability, urban spaces, proximity-based planning approaches such as the 15-minute city and global cooperation 9 . These shifts have influenced work, health, social equity, environmental stewardship 2 and urban planning, shaping innovative approaches and priorities in the postpandemic world. Urban inequality terms, such as slums and informality, inadequate housing and poverty, are brought to the forefront by the pandemic. Controlling the pandemic and addressing the citizen demand in slums and informal settlements has received significant attention 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 . Mobility restrictions and lockdowns to curb the virus’s transmission have presented challenges for service accessibility, particularly in disadvantaged neighborhoods where vulnerable groups reside. Lastly, the connection between sustainability and resilience has strengthened in the postpandemic period. The pandemic has offered new insights into the susceptibility of cities to various stressors and highlighted the inseparable connections between urban resilience and SDG11 (ref. 28 ).

a , b , The key thematic areas in period 1 (2016–2019) ( a ) are urban governance and policy (red), transportation (blue), urban sustainability and resilience (green), and urbanization and urban growth (yellow), while period 2 (2020–2022) ( b ) primarily focuses on urban governance and policies (red), urban studies (red), transportation (blue) and urbanization (green), particularly after the pandemic.

However, three SDG11 targets are not well-represented in both periods. One such target is SDG11.4, which aims to enhance efforts in preserving and conserving natural heritage, vital for improving urban sustainability 41 . Another target, SDG11.a, which focuses on strengthening urban–rural linkages, is also not adequately reflected in Fig. 2 . The intrinsic connection between cities and their surrounding rural areas necessitates the incorporation and strengthening of ties between urban and rural regions to achieve SDG11 (ref. 6 ). Gaps related to rural–urban linkages include limited understanding of interdependencies, inadequate infrastructure and services in rural areas, weak governance and coordination mechanisms, and social and cultural disconnect 13 . These gaps hinder the development of integrated strategies, contribute to economic disparities, limit access to services, impact agricultural productivity and food security, and create environmental and social challenges. Lastly, there is a lack of research on SDG11.c, which aims to support least-developed nations in developing safe and resilient urban areas, which is not surprising as these countries are often underrepresented in urban studies research 30 .

Major contributors to SDG11 research

Various countries, institutions, journals and authors have contributed to SDG11 research between 2016 and 2022. China leads in terms of the number of publications and citations generated, followed by the United States and the United Kingdom (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1 ). Among the top 20 productive countries, 14 are from the Global North countries, with South Africa and Brazil as the sole representative of Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 2 ). Increasing research collaboration among the top countries (Fig. 3 ), research infrastructure and facilities, manpower and financial support significantly contribute to their high SDG11 research output.

China followed by the United States and the United Kingdom dominates SDG11 research collaborations. There are significant connections among European, North American and Asian institutions, while Africa is less connected with Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean. Freq, frequently.

A co-citation analysis (Supplementary Table 3 ) reveals that Chinese institutions, such as the Chinese Academy of Sciences, have the highest number of articles and citation counts, followed by University College London and the University of Melbourne. The leading affiliations have changed over time, highlighting the strengthening of research institutes and the correlation between research collaboration and societal impacts (Supplementary Table 4 ). In terms of influential journals for SDG11 research, ‘land’ followed by ‘cities and land use’ policy tops the list (Supplementary Tables 5 and 6 ), with a growing interest in fields related to smart and sustainable cities, transport policies, regional planning and environmentally conscious building practices (Supplementary Fig. 4 ). These journals also address multiple issues related to environmental concerns, technological advancements, economic benefits, quality of life, justice and public awareness, driving the development of smart and sustainable cities.

The 15 most published authors in both periods focused on urbanization and urban growth, and the implementation, challenges and achievements of SDG11 (Supplementary Fig 5 ). This indicates an increased recognition of the SDG11 targets and their implementation over time, with the contributions of these authors significantly increasing from 2002 to 2016. Supplementary Table 7 shows that Chinese authors dominate the SDG11 publications, which correlates with China’s lead in institutions, affiliations and collaborations related to SDG11 research. The most cited SDG11 articles are revealed in Supplementary Table 8 , while the prominent authors that influenced SDG11 research are reported in Supplementary Table 9 . The top cited papers by SDG11 research are presented in Supplementary Tables 10 and 11 .

Key facts from the bibliometric analysis

The research on SDG11 has gained significant prominence across various fields, including urban studies, environmental sciences, geography, transportation and urban governance (Supplementary Table 12 ). The increasing environmental concerns, urbanization and global economic growth have spurred academic interest in SDG11 research from disciplines such as human geography, transportation, forestry, CC and sustainability science (Supplementary Table 13 ). Key thematic areas within SDG11 research encompass urban governance, affordable housing, transportation, urban sustainability and resilience, smart cities, urbanization and urban growth, which align closely with SDG11 targets 18 , 20 , 42 , 43 . However, research focus on SDG11 has remained relatively stable, with limited attention given to urban inequalities, safeguarding cultural and natural heritage 41 and specific impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on urban sustainability.

This study reveals a notable increase in the total SDG11 research output from 2016 to 2022, reflecting the growing emphasis on SDG11 research in recent years compared with earlier periods. China emerges as the leaders in terms of research outputs, citations, authors, institutions and collaborations, closely followed by the United States and the United Kingdom. These three countries contribute 47.71% of SDG11 research productivity within this period, which is higher than 31% reported in a previous similar study 28 .

The dominance of Global North countries in the top 20 countries with the highest number of publications and citations related to SDG11 research is expected given their strong institutional capacity, research funding, highly ranked universities and collaborations. China’s surge in publications on SDG11 can be attributed to rapid urbanization, economic growth, government support and active international collaborations 2 , 11 . Generally, the landscape of research on SDG11 demonstrates an Anglo–American hegemony, which may reinforce power asymmetries and have significant implications for sustainability and resilience 30 . It is concerning that while projections indicate that 90% of future urban population growth will occur in cities of the Global South, particularly Africa and Asia, there is limited research on urban development challenges in these regions 7 .

The debate about the politics of knowledge production in SDG11 research often revolves around the controls of knowledge production processes. Large, well-funded institutions in developed countries tend to dominate research agendas, focusing on themes and solutions relevant to their own contexts, overlooking the unique needs and challenges of the Global South, which perpetuate existing inequalities and privileging certain types of knowledge. Also, knowledge production involves recognizing and integrating diverse ways of knowing. While Western scientific paradigms have traditionally dominated SDG11 research, there is an increasing recognition of the importance of indigenous and non-Western knowledge systems. Integrating these diverse epistemologies enriches understanding and leads to more effective and culturally relevant solutions.

Additionally, SDG11 research is inherently interdisciplinary, involving fields such as urban planning, sociology, environmental science and public policy. However, interdisciplinary collaboration can be challenging due to differing terminologies, methodologies and research priorities. Navigating these differences becomes crucial in the politics of knowledge production to create cohesive and comprehensive research outputs. Finally, bridging the gap between knowledge production and its implementation faces political, economic and social barriers. Researchers and practitioners are increasingly considering how knowledge on urban sustainability can effectively influence policymaking and practice in diverse urban contexts. Mobilizing knowledge to address these barriers becomes a key consideration in the politics of knowledge production.

Challenges to achieving SDG11

There are several challenges to achieving SDG11 targets, including inadequate provision of affordable housing 31 , essential services 24 , green spaces 2 , 34 , efficient transportation 33 and conservation of cultural and natural assets 25 . Rapid urbanization 1 , 7 , CC impacts 44 , insufficient investment in public infrastructure 30 , poor governance 13 and widening livelihood, land and resources inequalities 43 further exacerbate these challenges. For example, rapid urbanization puts immense pressure on housing, infrastructure, services and resources, making it challenging to effectively manage urban growth and ensure sustainable urban development 11 . Inadequate urban planning and land-use policies lead to inefficient land utilization, urban sprawl and inadequate provision of basic services 7 , 21 . The existence of slums and informal settlements where a large portion of the urban dwellers live in substandard housing conditions without tenure security 14 and limited access to electricity, water, sanitation, education, healthcare and employment opportunities 23 , 37 , and marginalized and vulnerable populations facing social exclusion, add to the complexity.

Moreover, competing priorities and trade-offs, lack of integration among various urban sectors and agencies 35 , inadequate human, technical and material resources at local government levels 45 , and insufficient local indicators and methods for implementation and monitoring 46 often hamper the implementation of SDG11 targets. Additionally, limited awareness of SDG-related challenges for policy formulation and implementation hinders context-depended decision-making and targeted interventions 21 , 27 . Addressing social inequalities, ensuring inclusivity in urban development and synergy among multiple fields, including social, technical, environmental, policy and management are crucial for achieving SDG11 (refs. 14 , 26 , 46 ). A valuable lesson can be learned from the success of the framework for assessing the implementation of SDG11 targets at the local level in Japan 42 .

Conclusions

This study aims to enhance our understanding of urban sustainability and provide insights for future research, policies and actions needed to achieve SDG11 targets. By conducting a comprehensive bibliometric assessment of over 21,000 publications from 2016 to 2022, it significantly contributes to the existing body of knowledge, highlighting trends, thematic areas and knowledge gaps related to SDG11 research across countries, institutions, authors and journals. SDG11 research has evolved into a multidisciplinary field, encompassing diverse themes, such as transportation, housing, urban sustainability, smart cities, urbanization and urban governance and policy. However, there is a need to address the gaps in research on urban safety and inclusion, which are critical dimensions often overlooked in favor of environmental and economic aspects of sustainability. This imbalance in research thematic areas risks perpetuation of already existing disparities within SDG11 research and its goals.

China, the United States and the United Kingdom emerge as the top contributors to SDG11 research and collaboration. To foster more SDG11 research in low-income economies, it is essential to provide increased funding support, capacity building and training for scholars, promote collaboration and knowledge exchange, and improve research infrastructure and data collection. Despite global challenges such as armed conflicts, CC and the COVID-19 pandemic, progress toward achieving the SDGs will become apparent by 2030. However, there are still opportunities for further research, knowledge dissemination and international collaboration toward developing safe, sustainable and inclusive urban development. The following are priority areas for SDG11 research:

Urban policy and governance: reforms should focus on providing equitable access to basic services such as water, sanitation, electricity, healthcare and education; upgrading and formalizing informal settlements; and improving living conditions of over one billion people residing in slums 37 . Participatory governance, community engagement and empowerment can enhance social inclusion by considering the voices and needs of marginalized groups 13 , 23 . Urban policy should also prioritize preserving historic and natural resources, protecting vulnerable areas and implementing sustainable urban design principles 47 . Future studies can help understand the dynamics, challenges and opportunities and monitor progress toward SDG11 targets 15 .

Localizing SDG11 targets: spatial planning and land-use strategies should consider the needs of diverse urban populations, promote inclusive zoning and engage local communities and stakeholders in decision-making processes, crucial for fostering ownership, empowerment and social cohesion, leading to more sustainable and inclusive urban development 3 . However, enhancing the capacity for localizing SDG11 targets requires building the knowledge and skills of local governments, policymakers and practitioners. Capacity-building initiatives, such as training programs, workshops and knowledge exchange, can promote interdisciplinary understanding and sharing of best practices.

Concerted and collaborative efforts: the international community, academics, policymakers and stakeholders can work together to create inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable communities. Collaborative efforts can facilitate a comprehensive understanding of urban challenges and potential solutions by integrating diverse perspectives, data and methodologies. Disseminating research findings contributes to evidence-based policy development and informed decision-making, enabling the learning of lessons and replication of successful interventions.

Breaking down silos: integrated and cross-sectoral approaches help narrow the gaps between sectors, local governments, policymakers and stakeholders, leveraging local resources and capacities while fostering communication, knowledge sharing and collaboration 31 . Cross-sectoral working groups, joint planning processes and integrated policy frameworks promote holistic and coordinated decision-making among various sectors, including urban planning, housing, transportation, health, education, environment and social welfare 47 .

Digitalization and smart city development: maximizing the benefits of digitalization and smart city solutions requires addressing challenges such as bridging digital divides and ensuring data access, privacy and security. Prioritizing citizen-centric approaches and public accessibility to technology 36 are essential for leveraging expertise and resources 15 . Interoperability, scalability, data-driven decision-making and inclusivity contribute to evidence-based planning and equitable access to smart city technologies 12 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 .

This study comprehensively assessed SDG11 research, emphasizing significant thematic areas, trends, challenges and suggestions for prioritizing SDG11, including effective urban policy and governance, localizing SDG11 targets, concerted and collaborative efforts, and digitalization and smart city development. To broaden the scope of SDG11 research, future bibliometric reviews should encompass non-Web of Science databases and gray literature, including publications from government and nongovernmental agencies. Despite its limitations, this study’s findings provide valuable references for further research on SDG11.

The present study utilized a bibliometric technique to analyze academic publication on SDG11, tracing the research trend, the evolving key themes and identifying contributing authors, institutions and countries. Bibliometrics is a quantitative technique that allows for the analysis of trends in scholarly publications, such as research articles, conference papers and books, and visualizes scholarly publication patterns 52 . This technique is instrumental in analyzing extensive literature sets by relying on statistical observations and text-mining capabilities, which qualitative review methods such as systematic reviews cannot accomplish 53 . Additionally, it presents a scientific landscape of authors, countries, organizations and collaborations that contribute to worldwide scientific literature.

Bibliometric analysis requires interpretation, introducing an element of subjectivity 54 . Therefore, a sensemaking approach was adopted to transition from describing the bibliometric results to interpreting them. Sensemaking helps derive insightful information from bibliometric analysis and can be integrated into systematic literature reviews 55 , 56 . It applies to various international indexing, abstracting and citation databases, such as Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, PubMed and Education Resources Information Center, which cover journals, books, reviews and conference proceedings from around the world and different regions. For this study, Web of Science was chosen as the database to obtain bibliographic data due to its wide range of topics in various fields of study such as natural sciences, health sciences, engineering, social science, computer science and materials sciences. It is one of the world’s largest peer-reviewed scientific literature databases, with 87 million indexed items.

Specialized bibliometrics software were employed, including VOSviewer (version 1.6.19) 52 , Biblioshiny (version 4.1.3) 55 and BibExcel (version 2017) 57 . VOSviewer, known for its user-friendly interface, was used to understand the thematic focus and evolution of research on SDG11. It generates networks of nodes and links, with node size representing the frequency of the studied item, and link width indicating the strength of connections between items. Clusters of intricately linked nodes are shown in distinct colors. The thematic focus was examined for two periods: period 1 (2016–2019) and period 2 (2020–2022), considering the time since the SDGs were introduced to the time of data collection in this study. Another reason for this categorization is that evidence shows that the pandemic has significantly affected progress toward achieving SDGs 58 . VOSviewer allows for various types of analysis, including term co-occurrence, co-citation, citation and bibliographic coupling 53 . A term co-occurrence analysis was used in this study to highlight key thematic areas. To ensure accuracy and avoid separate counting of synonyms, a thesaurus file was developed and added to the software before the analysis. A summary of the data, including the number of authors and journals, used in the analysis is presented in Table 1 and will be further explained below.

A comprehensive search query was formulated to retrieve relevant data on SDG11, and it was executed in the title, abstract and keywords fields (TS) in Web of Science on 5 July 2023. The initial query shown the following box resulted in a total of 334,224 documents. Co-citation analysis was employed to identify the most influential journals contributing to SDG11 research. Two works are considered co-cited when they are both mentioned in the works cited section of a subsequent publication 59 (Zhao, 2006).

TS = ((‘city’ OR ‘cities’ OR ‘human settlement*’ OR ‘urban’ OR ‘metropoli*’ OR ‘town*’ OR ‘municipal*’ OR ‘peri-urban*’ OR ‘urban-rural’ OR ‘rural-urban’) AND (‘gentrification’ OR ‘congestion’ OR ‘transport*’ OR ‘housing’ OR ‘slum*’ OR ‘informal settlement*’ OR ‘sendai framework’ OR ‘Disaster Risk Reduction’ OR ‘disaster’ OR ‘DRR’ OR ‘smart cit*’ OR ‘resilient building*’ OR ‘sustainable building*’ OR ‘building design’ OR ‘buildings design’ OR ‘urbani?ation’ OR ‘zero energy’ OR ‘zero-energy’ OR ‘basic service*’ OR ‘governance’ OR ‘citizen participation’ OR ‘collaborative planning’ OR ‘participatory planning’ OR ‘inclusiveness’ OR ‘cultural heritage’ OR ‘natural heritage’ OR ‘UNESCO’ OR ‘ecological footprint’ OR ‘environmental footprint’ OR ‘waste’ OR ‘pollution’ OR ‘pollutant*’ OR ‘waste water’ OR wastewater* OR waste-water* OR ‘recycling’ OR ‘circular economy’ OR ‘air quality’ OR ‘green space’ OR ‘green spaces’ OR ‘nature inclusive’ OR ‘nature inclusive building’ OR ‘nature inclusive buildings’ OR ‘resilient’ OR ‘resilience’ OR ‘healthy cit*’ OR ‘sustainable’ OR ‘sustainability’ OR ‘green’ OR ‘nature*’ OR ‘Green infrastructure*’ OR ‘nature-based solution*’ OR ‘nature based solution*’ OR ‘child*’ OR ‘wom?n’ OR ‘elderl*’ OR ‘disabl*’ OR ‘disabilit*’ OR ‘disabled’)) AND PY = (2016–2022) NOT PY = (2023)

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework was used to report document search and filtration process. The PRISMA framework is designed to help scholars transparently report why their review study is conducted, what activities are performed and what discoveries are made, ideal for both systematic reviews and bibliometric studies 60 . PRISMA presents the four stages of the above query’s overall searching and filtration process (Fig. 4 ). The identification stage yielded 334,224 records, which were then screened to select only article-type documents ( n  = 277,165). Subsequently, documents were further screened based on language, selecting only English documents ( n  = 257,374). In the final stage, documents were screened based on specific categories closely related to cities and SDG11, resulting in a selection of six major categories: urban studies, environmental studies, geography, urban and regional planning, architecture, transportation and physical geography ( n  = 21,168). Finally, 15 duplicated documents were removed, resulting in a final dataset of 21,153 documents.

A four-phase flow diagram of the data extraction and filtration process of SDG11 literature, adapted from Priyadarshini 57 . WoS, Web of Science.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available as supplementary information. The steps for curating the data from the Web of Science have been provided in the text. If there is a further need, data are available on figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26360125 . Source data are provided with this paper.

Almulhim, A. I. & Cobbinah, P. B. Can rapid urbanization be sustainable? The case of Saudi Arabian cities. Habitat Int. 139 , 102884 (2023).

Article   Google Scholar  

Huang, W. et al. Evaluating green city development in China using an integrated analytical toolbox. J. Clean. Prod. 400 , 136703 (2023).

Feng, T. & Zhou, B. Impact of urban spatial structure elements on carbon emissions efficiency in growing megacities: the case of Chengdu. Sci. Rep. 13 , 9939 (2023).

Javeed, S., Siddique, H. M. A. & Javed, F. Ecological footprint, globalization, and economic growth: evidence from Asia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 , 77006–77021 (2023).

Rees, W. E. Cities, energy, and the uncertain future of urban civilization. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 51 , 11–17 (2023).

Abubakar, I. R. & Aina, Y. A. The prospects and challenges of developing more inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable cities in Nigeria. Land Use Policy 87 , 104105 (2019).

UN-Habitat World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. (UN-Habitat, 2022).

Almulhim, A. I. & Cobbinah, P. B. Framing resilience in Saudi Arabian cities: on climate change and urban policy. Sustain. Cities Soc. 101 , 105172 (2024).

Barbier, E. B. & Burgess, J. C. Sustainability and development after COVID-19. World Dev. 135 , 105082 (2020).

The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018 (United Nations, 2018).

Chen, M., Chen, L., Cheng, J. & Yu, J. Identifying interlinkages between urbanization and Sustainable Development Goals. Geogr. Sustain. 3 , 339–346 (2022).

Clement, J., Ruysschaert, B. & Crutzen, N. Smart city strategies—a driver for localizing sustainable development goals? Ecol. Econ. 213 , 107941 (2023).

Hansson, S., Arfvidsson, H. & Simon, D. Governance for sustainable urban development: the double function of SDG indicators. Area Dev. Policy 4 , 217–235 (2019).

Leal Filho, W. et al. Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 26 , 179–190 (2019).

Parra-Dominguez, J., Gil-Egido, A. & Rodríguez-González, S. SDGs as one of the drivers of smart city development: the indicator selection process. Smart Cities 5 , 1025–1038 (2022).

Grainger-Brown, J., Malekpour, S., Raven, R. & Taylor, E. Exploring urban transformation to inform the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Cities 131 , 103928 (2022).

Xu, Z. et al. Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time. Nature 577 , 74–78 (2020).

Salvia, A. L., Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L. L. & Griebeler, J. S. Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: local and global issues. J. Clean. Prod. 208 , 841–849 (2019).

Indana, F. & Pahlevi, R. W. A bibliometric approach to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) systematic analysis. Cogent Bus. Manag. 10 , 2224174 (2023).

Yamaguchi, N. U. et al. Sustainable development goals: a bibliometric analysis of literature reviews. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 , 5502–5515 (2023).

Pattberg, P. & Bäckstrand, K. Enhancing the achievement of the SDGs: lessons learned at the half-way point of the 2030 Agenda. Int. Environ. Agree. 23 , 107–114 (2023).

Keith, M. et al. A new urban narrative for sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 6 , 115–117 (2023).

Pedersen, A. B. et al. SDGs at the halfway point: how the 17 global goals address risks and wicked problems. Ambio 52 , 679–682 (2023).

Sweileh, W. M. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on ‘sustainable development goals’ with emphasis on ‘good health and well-being’ goal (2015–2019). Global. Health 16 , 68 (2020).

Mihelcic, J. R. et al. Environmental research addressing Sustainable Development Goals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 , 3457–3460 (2023).

Palau-Pinyana, E., Llach, J. & Bagur-Femenías, L. Mapping enablers for SDG implementation in the private sector: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Manag. Rev. Q. 26 , 1–30 (2023).

Google Scholar  

Mishra, M. et al. A bibliometric analysis of sustainable development goals (SDGs): a review of progress, challenges, and opportunities. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 26 , 11101–11143 (2023).

Devisscher, T. et al. in Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People (eds. Katila, P. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).

Brenner, N. & Theodore, N. Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode 34 , 349–379 (2002).

Sharifi, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Allam, Z. & Asadzadeh, A. Progress and prospects in planning: a bibliometric review of literature in urban studies and regional and urban planning, 1956–2022. Prog. Plann. 173 , 100740 (2023).

Olanrewaju, A., Tan, S. Y. & Abdul-Aziz, A.-R. Housing providers’ insights on the benefits of sustainable, affordable housing. Sustain. Dev. 26 , 847–858 (2018).

Rice, J. L., Cohen, D. A., Long, J. & Jurjevich, J. R. Contradictions of the climate-friendly city: new perspectives on eco-gentrification and housing justice. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 44 , 145–165 (2020).

Park, S., Choi, K. & Lee, J. S. To walk or not to walk: testing the effect of path walkability on transit users’ access mode choices to the station. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 9 , 529–541 (2015).

Jayasooriya, V. M., Ng, A. W. M., Muthukumaran, S. & Perera, B. J. C. Green infrastructure practices for the improvement of urban air quality. Urban For. Urban Green. 21 , 34–47 (2017).

Hachaichi, M. & Egieya, J. Water–food–energy nexus in global cities: addressing complex urban interdependencies. Water Resour. Manag. 37 , 1811–1825 (2023).

Mora, L., Deakin, M. & Reid, A. Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 142 , 56–69 (2019).

McFarlane, C. Rethinking informality: politics, crisis, and the city. Plan. Theory Pract. 13 , 89–108 (2012).

Harvey, D. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geogr. Ann. B 71 , 3–17 (1989).

Peck, J. Political economies of scale: fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Econ. Geogr. 78 , 331–360 (2002).

Cervero, R. & Landis, J. Twenty years of the Bay Area rapid transit system: land use and development impacts. Transport. Res. A 31 , 309–333 (1997).

Guzman, P. C., Roders, A. R. P. & Colenbrander, B. J. F. Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: an overview of global monitoring tools. Cities 60 , 192–201 (2017).

Yamasaki, K. & Yamada, T. A framework to assess the local implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 11. Sustain. Cities Soc. 84 , 104002 (2022).

van Zanten, J. A. & van Tulder, R. Towards nexus-based governance: defining interactions between economic activities and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 28 , 210–226 (2021).

Londono-Pineda, A. A. & Cano, J. A. Assessments under the United Nations sustainable development goals: a bibliometric analysis. Environ. Clim. Technol. 26 , 166–181 (2022).

Biggeri, M. A. ‘Decade for Action’ on SDG localization. J. Hum. Dev. Capabil. 22 , 706–712 (2021).

Benedek, J., Ivan, K., Török, I., Temerdek, A. & Holobâcă, I. H. Indicator-based assessment of local and regional progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): an integrated approach from Romania. Sustain. Dev. 29 , 860–875 (2021).

Abubakar, I. R. & Alshammari, M. S. Urban planning schemes for developing low-carbon cities in the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Habitat Int. 138 , 102881 (2023).

Batty, M. Smart cities, big data. Environ. Plann. B 39 , 191–193 (2012).

Smith, N. Toward a theory of gentrification, a back to the city movement by capital, not people. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 45 , 538–548 (1979).

Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Random House, 1961).

Smith, N. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City (Routledge, 1996).

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 133 , 285–296 (2021).

van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 , 523–538 (2010).

Hajek, P., Youssef, A. & Hajkova, V. Recent developments in smart city assessment: a bibliometric and content analysis-based literature review. Cities 126 , 103709 (2022).

Lim, W. M. & Kumar, S. Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometrics analysis: a sensemaking approach. Glob. Bus. Organ. Excell. 43 , 17–26 (2023).

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 11 , 959–975 (2017).

Åström, F., Danell, R., Larsen, B. & Schneider, J. (eds) Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday Vol. 05-S (International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2009).

Priyadarshini, P. The COVID-19 pandemic has derailed the progress of Sustainable Development Goals. Anthr. Sci. 1 , 410–412 (2022).

Zhao, D. Towards all-author co-citation analysis. Inf. Process. Manag. 42 , 1578–1591 (2006).

Shamseer, L. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349 , g7647 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.I.A. acknowledges Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, for their support in conducting this study. A.S. acknowledges the support of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant number 22K04493. We appreciate Hiroshima University for supporting the open-access publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Abdulaziz I. Almulhim

The IDEC Institute and Network for Education and Research on Peace and Sustainability, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

Ayyoob Sharifi

Department of Geomatics Engineering Technology, Yanbu Industrial College, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia

Yusuf A. Aina

Directorate of Library Affairs, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Shakil Ahmad

The Business School, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK

Academy of Architecture and Urban Studies, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

Walter Leal Filho

Research and Transfer Centre ‘Sustainable Development and Climate Change Management’, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Ismaila Rimi Abubakar

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

A.I.A.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, investigation and project administration. A.S.: methodology, software, formal analysis, visualization and writing—original draft. Y.A.A.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, investigation and validation. S.A.: methodology, software, formal analysis, visualization and data curation. L.M.: writing—review and editing, and investigation. W.L.F.: writing—review and editing, and investigation. I.R.A.: writing—review and editing, investigation, supervision, validation and resources.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Abdulaziz I. Almulhim or Ayyoob Sharifi .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature Cities thanks Aliyu Salisu Barau, Oluwatobi Owojori, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information.

Supplementary Figs. 1–5 and Tables 1–13.

Reporting Summary

Source data fig. 1.

Statistical source data in Excel format.

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data fig. 3, source data fig. 4, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Almulhim, A.I., Sharifi, A., Aina, Y.A. et al. Charting sustainable urban development through a systematic review of SDG11 research. Nat Cities (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00117-6

Download citation

Received : 22 September 2023

Accepted : 30 July 2024

Published : 27 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00117-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development

Volume 26, Issue 9

Bioecosystems towards sustainable agricultural extension delivery: effects of various factors.

• Enock Siankwilimba
• Chisoni Mumba
• Md Enamul Hoque

Electric vehicle controllers for sustainable energy management: recommendations and challenges

• Mohini Gunjal
• Lini Mathew
• Shimi Sudha Letha

Discovering research evolution and emerging trends in ammonium wastewater treatment technologies: a bibliometric analysis

• Ching Yi Hong
• Khalida Muda
• Farhan Mohd Pauzi

The hidden threat to food safety and human health: microplastics

• Merve Esra Çıtar Dazıroğlu
• Saniye Bilici

Meta-analysis of agroecological technologies and practices in the sustainable management of banana pests and diseases

• Anicet G. Dassou
• Silvère Tovignan
• Simplice D. Vodouhè

Enhancing resilience in agricultural production systems with AI-based technologies

• Member Joy Usigbe
• Senorpe Asem-Hiablie
• Rammohan Mallipeddi

Comprehensive study of microbial bioplastic: present status and future perspectives for sustainable development

• Deshraj Deepak Kapoor
• Shilpi Yadav
• Ravi Kr. Gupta

Real-time monitoring of physicochemical parameters in water using big data and smart IoT sensors

• Naresh Sharma
• Rohit Sharma

Agroecology and organic farming foster soil health by promoting soil fauna

• Anahí Domínguez
• Héctor Javier Escudero
• José Camilo Bedano

Research on the evolutionary mechanism and optimum control of pro-environmental behavior of polluting enterprises driven by environmental policies

Economically viable flower drying techniques to sustain flower industry amid COVID-19 pandemic

• Mukesh Kumar
• Veena Chaudhary
• Arun Lal Srivastav

Towards more sustainable Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) projects in Magway Region, Myanmar

• Cho Zin Win
• Warit Jawjit
• Trakarn Prapaspongsa

Do economic complexity and macroeconomic stability asymmetrically affect carbon emissions in OECD? Evidence from nonlinear panel ARDL approach

• Devran Şanlı
• Nadide Gülbay Yiğiteli

Does digital transformation promote the green innovation of China’s listed companies?

Households’ coping mechanisms with droughts and floods using finance, non-finance and the social safety net measures: evidence from Kenya

• Adan Guyo Shibia

A life cycle analysis-based comprehensive study on municipal solid waste management: a case study of Central India

• Ashootosh Mandpe
• Ayushman Bhattacharya
• Sunil Kumar

Agroforestry for Sustainable Development: Assessing Frameworks to Drive Agricultural Sector Growth

• Shubhendu Singh
• Gaurvendra Singh

Agriculture, food security, and climate change in South Asia: a new perspective on sustainable development

• Biswanath Behera
• Anasuya Haldar
• Narayan Sethi

Do rural women realized land tenure security rights? South Wollo, Ethiopia

• Asrat Mulat Asegie
• Walelgn Kebede Ayele

Application of 3D numerical simulations to forecast mine seepage and groundwater flow conditions with respect to progressive coal mining activity

• Rambabu Singh
• N. Srinivasa Rao
• D. K. Kisku

Predicting future opportunities and threats of land-use changes on beekeeping activities in Turkey

Assessment of land-use land-cover dynamics and urban heat island effect of Dehradun city, North India: a remote sensing approach

• Ashish Mishra
• Dhyan Singh Arya

Sustainability assessment of a conceptual multipurpose offshore platform in the South China Sea

• Shanyu Chen
• Fengjun Duan
• Shigeru Tabeta

Who pays and who should pay for the uncertain conservation cost in biodiversity banking programs: evidence from a laboratory experiment

• Keisaku Higashida
• Kenta Tanaka
• Shunsuke Managi

Is there a pollution haven in European Union global value chain participation?

• Hugo Campos-Romero
• Paulo Reis Mourao
• Óscar Rodil-Marzábal

Abatement effect of exporting and environmental regulation stringency: evidence from a natural experiment in China

• Ruiqi Cheng

Adaptation constraints and prospects for future research priorities in lowland rice-based farming systems: learning experiences from Northwest Cambodia

• Rebecca Cross
• Daniel K. Y. Tan

A hybrid approach for sustainable-circular supplier selection based on industry 4.0 framework to make the supply chain smart and eco-friendly 

• Jingwen Zhang
• Muhammad Shoaib

SEFWaM–deep learning based smart ensembled framework for waste management

• Anannya Mishra
• Vandana Bhatia

Ameliorating sustainable business performance through green constructs: a case of manufacturing industry

• Shabnam Khan
• Umar Nawaz Kayani

The role of vegetation carbon sequestration in offsetting energy carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Basin, China

Evaluation of carbon emission efficiency and spatial relevance in the thermal power industry: evidence from China

• Rui-tang Guo
• Wei-guo Pan

Greening your business: nexus of green dynamic capabilities, green innovation and sustainable performance

• Ayesha Mubeen
• Qasim Ali Nisar
• Waqar Ahmad

Investigation on how carbon markets and digital transformation affect green innovation: evidence from Chinese listed companies

Who are the genuine contributors to economic development under environmental regulation? Evidence from total factor productivity in the three industries

• Derong Yang

Does CEO’s initial tenure enhance CSR practices? Evaluating the consequences of CEO’s initial tenure CSR engagement in China

• Talat Mehmood Khan
• Hazrat Hassan

Green Intellectual Capital: a critical factor to explain the relationship between corporate sustainable and financial performance

• Ioannis E. Nikolaou
• Thomas A. Tsalis
• Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis

The impact of internet development on China's energy intensity and its mechanism analysis

• Yongqi Wang
• Wenzhi Wang

Strength and microstructure characteristics of low-grade (LG) limestone-based cements for a sustainable concrete

• Venugopal Reddy Tamma
• Rathish Kumar Pancharathi
• Swamy Naga Ratna Giri Pallapothu

The role of social identity between community motivation and intention to participate in tourism development in Malaysia

• Merith Ifeoma Anaba
• Muhammad Mehedi Masud
• Goh Hong Ching

The nexus of green investment, high-quality economic development, and carbon emissions in China: evidence according to an ARDL–ECM approach

• Yuanyuan Wan

Studying the green performance under the lens of total quality management in Chinese SMEs

• Rana Faizan Gul
• Khalid Jamil
• Fazal Hussain Awan

Analysing adoption of eVehicles among Indian consumers: a novel approach towards sustainable transport

• Dhirendra Kumar Tiwari
• Urvashi Tandon
• Amit Mittal

Inter-basin water transfer: A sustainable solution or an ephemeral painkiller to water shortage?

• Shahin Salimpour Naghani
• Mehdi Azhdary Moghaddam
• Seyed Arman Hashemi Monfared

Livelihood vulnerability assessment of land-lost farmers in the context of tourism and the COVID-19 pandemic

• Wenyue Tang
• Qianguang Wang
• Jianmin Wan

Does digital empowerment affect corporate green investment efficiency?

• Feimei Liao

A modified distance friction minimization model with optimistic–pessimistic target orientation for OECD sustainable performance measurement

• Habib Zare Ahmadabadi
• Fatemeh Zamzam
• Ali Morovati Sharifabadi

The power of financial innovation in neutralizing carbon emissions: the case of mobile money in Somalia

• Abdinur Ali Mohamed
• Fartun Ahmed Sheikh Mohamud

Spatial multicriteria analysis to select suitable sites for sewage sludge use in agriculture: a case study in southeast Brazil

• Lucas Almeida Chamhum-Silva
• Thiago Bressani-Ribeiro
• Cesar Rossas Mota Filho

Promoting the production and consumption of green products from the perspective of supply and demand: An evolutionary game-based analysis

• Changchun Zhu

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Toward greener supply chains by decarbonizing city logistics: a systematic literature review and research pathways.

1. Introduction

2. research background and motivation, 2.1. research background, 2.2. research motivation, 4. bibliometric analysis and discussion, 4.1. publication years, 4.2. publication by journals, 4.3. publication by country, 4.4. keyword analysis, 5. a recap of proposed dcl solutions and qbl aspects in the extant literature.

6. Evolution of DCL Research and Concluding Remarks

Author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• IPCC. CC Widespread, Rapid, and Intensifying. 2021. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/2021/08/09/ar6-wg1-20210809-pr/ (accessed on 14 September 2023).
• Yun, N.Y.; Ülkü, M.A. Sustainable supply chain risk management in a climate-changed world: Review of extant literature, trend analysis, and guiding framework for future research. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 13199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• United Nations. What Is Climate Change? 2020. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/what-is-climate-change (accessed on 20 May 2023).
• NOAA. Climate Change Impacts. 2021. Available online: https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/climate/climate-change-impacts (accessed on 5 June 2023).
• Koç, Ç.; Bektaş, T.; Jabali, O.; Laporte, G. The fleet size and mix pollution-routing problem. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2014 , 70 , 239–254. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, A.; Lyu, Q. Research progress and prospect of tourism carbon emissions and its uncertainty analysis under the goal of low-carbon scenic spots. Proc. Bus. Econ. Stud. 2023 , 6 , 25–32. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guo, J.; Zhao, Q.; Xi, M. Sustainable urban logistics distribution network planning with carbon tax. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 13184. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bruglieri, M.; Mancini, S.; Pezzella, F.; Pisacane, O. A path-based solution approach for the green vehicle routing problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 2019 , 103 , 109–122. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Islam, M.A.; Gajpal, Y.; ElMekkawy, T.Y. Mixed fleet based green clustered logistics problem under carbon emission cap. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021 , 72 , 103074. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jiao, H.; Yang, F.; Xu, S.; Huang, S. Using large-scale truck trajectory data to explore the location of sustainable urban logistics centres—The case of Wuhan. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023 , 12 , 88. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mansouri, B.; Sahu, S.; Ülkü, M.A. Toward greening city logistics: A systematic review on corporate governance and social responsibility in managing urban distribution centres. Logistics 2023 , 7 , 19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fraselle, J.; Limbourg, S.L.; Vidal, L. Cost and environmental impacts of a mixed fleet of vehicles. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 9413. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Habib, M.A. Transit systems and the quality of life. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research ; Maggino, F., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 7291–7293. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kaufman, F.D.; Ülkü, M.A. An interdisciplinary inquiry into sustainable supply chain management. In Handbook of Research on Supply Chain Management for Sustainable Development ; I.G.I. Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–17. [ Google Scholar ]
• Li, J.; Dang, S.; Wen, M.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Shang, W. Index modulation multiple access for 6G communications: Principles, applications, and challenges. IEEE Netw. 2023 , 37 , 52–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wen, M.; Zheng, B.; Kim, K.J.; Di Renzo, M.; Tsiftsis, T.A.; Chen, K.C.; Al-Dhahir, N. A survey on spatial modulation in emerging wireless systems: Research progresses and applications. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2019 , 37 , 1949–1972. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pacura, W.; Szramowiat-Sala, K.; Gołaś, J. Emissions from light-duty vehicles—From statistics to emission regulations and vehicle testing in the European Union. Energies 2023 , 17 , 209. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• CARB. Zero-Emission Vehicles and the Advanced Clean Cars Regulations. 2024. Available online: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/cars-and-light-trucks-are-going-zero-frequently-asked-questions#:~:text=As%20part%20of%20the%20Advanced,zero%2Demission%20vehicles%20by%202035 (accessed on 6 August 2023).
• Cain, M.; Jenkins, S.; Allen, M.R.; Lynch, J.; Frame, D.J.; Macey, A.H.; Peters, G.P. Methane and the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2022 , 380 , 20200456. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ülkü, M.A.; Engau, A. Sustainable supply chain analytics. In Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure ; Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T., Eds.; Encyclopedia of the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 1123–1134. [ Google Scholar ]
• Viu-Roig, M.; Alvarez-Palau, E.J. The impact of E-Commerce-related last-mile logistics on cities: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 6492. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lauenstein, S.; Schank, C. Design of a sustainable last mile in urban logistics—A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 5501. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• World Bank. Urban Development. 2023. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview (accessed on 20 April 2024).
• Hussain, M.; Imitiyaz, I. Urbanization concepts, dimensions and factors. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2018 , 9 , 23513–23523. [ Google Scholar ]
• Statista. Percentage of Population Living in Urban Areas Worldwide from 1950 to 2050, by Regional Development. 2018. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/671366/change-in-urbanization-of-countries-worldwide-by-regional-development/ (accessed on 20 April 2024).
• Savelsbergh, M.; Van Woensel, T. City logistics: Challenges and opportunities: 50th anniversary invited article. Transp. Sci. 2016 , 50 , 579–590. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Calisto Friant, M.; Reid, K.; Boesler, P.; Vermeulen, W.J.; Salomone, R. Sustainable circular cities? Analysing urban circular economy policies in Amsterdam, Glasgow, and Copenhagen. Local Environ. 2023 , 28 , 1331–1369. [ Google Scholar ]
• Swamy, S.; Baindur, D. Managing urban logistics in an expanding city—Case study of Ahmedabad. World Conf. Transp. Res. 2013 , 380009 , 1–21. [ Google Scholar ]
• Statista. Retail E-Commerce Sales Worldwide from 2014 to 2027. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/#statisticContainer (accessed on 21 April 2024).
• Statista. Revenue of the Online Food Delivery Market Worldwide from 2017 to 2028, by Segment. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1170631/online-food-delivery-market-size-worldwide/ (accessed on 21 April 2024).
• Statista. Market Share of Leading Retail E-Commerce Companies in the United States in 2023. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/274255/market-share-of-the-leading-retailers-in-us-e-commerce/ (accessed on 7 August 2024).
• Statista. Annual Net Sales Revenue of Amazon from 2004 to 2023. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/266282/annual-net-revenue-of-amazoncom/ (accessed on 20 April 2024).
• Rodrigue, J.P. The distribution network of Amazon and the footprint of freight digitalization. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020 , 88 , 102825. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Statista. Market Share of Leading Online Meal Delivery Companies in the United States as of March 2024. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1235724/market-share-us-food-delivery-companies/ (accessed on 7 August 2024).
• Poon, W.C.; Tung, S.E.H. The rise of online food delivery culture during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of intention and its associated risk. Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2024 , 33 , 54–73. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alnaggar, A.; Gzara, F.; Bookbinder, J.H. Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature. Omega 2021 , 98 , 102139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ülkü, M.A.; Bookbinder, J.H.; Yun, N.Y. Leveraging industry 4.0 technologies for sustainable humanitarian supply chains: Evidence from the extant literature. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 1321. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Statista. Total Population of China from 1980 to 2023 with Forecasts Until 2029. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263765/total-population-of-china/ (accessed on 16 April 2024).
• Pourmohammad-Zia, N.; van Koningsveld, M. Sustainable urban logistics: A case study of waterway integration in Amsterdam. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024 , 105 , 105334. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ülkü, M.A. Dare to care: Shipment consolidation reduces not only costs, but also environmental damage. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012 , 139 , 438–446. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, S.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, D. An optimization model of a sustainable city logistics network design based on goal programming. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 7418. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, W.; Zhang, D.; Van Woensel, T.; Xu, G.; Guo, J. Green vehicle routing using mixed fleets for cold chain distribution. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023 , 233 , 120979. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Anderluh, A.; Nolz, P.C.; Hemmelmayr, V.C.; Crainic, T.G. Multi-objective optimization of a two-echelon vehicle routing problem with vehicle synchronization and ‘grey zone’ customers arising in urban logistics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2021 , 289 , 940–958. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sayarshad, H.R.; Mahmoodian, V.; Bojović, N. Dynamic inventory routing and pricing problem with a mixed fleet of electric and conventional urban freight vehicles. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 6703. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wehbi, L.; Bektaş, T.; Iris, Ç. Optimising vehicle and on-foot porter routing in urban logistics. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2022 , 109 , 103371. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Enthoven, D.L.; Jargalsaikhan, B.; Roodbergen, K.J.; Uit het Broek, M.A.; Schrotenboer, A.H. The two-echelon vehicle routing problem with covering options: City logistics with cargo bikes and parcel lockers. Comput. Oper. Res. 2020 , 118 , 104919. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fan, L. A two-stage hybrid ant colony algorithm for multi-depot half-open time-dependent electric vehicle routing problem. Complex Intell. Syst. 2024 , 10 , 2107–2128. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fan, X.; Yao, G.; Yang, Y. Multi-compartment vehicle routing problem considering traffic congestion under the mixed carbon policy. Appl. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 10304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, K.; Chae, J.; Song, B.; Choi, D. A model for sustainable courier services: Vehicle routing with exclusive lanes. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 1077. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wong, E.Y.C.; Tai, A.H.; So, S. Container drayage modelling with graph theory-based road connectivity assessment for sustainable freight transportation in new development area. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020 , 149 , 106810. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wei, H.; Li, A.; Jia, N. Research on optimization and design of sustainable urban underground logistics network framework. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 9147. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ahani, P.; Arantes, A.; Garmanjani, R.; Melo, S. Optimizing vehicle replacement in sustainable urban freight transportation subject to presence of regulatory measures. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 12266. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Akkad, M.Z.; Bányai, T. Multi-objective approach for optimization of city logistics considering energy efficiency. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 7366. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dupas, R.; Taniguchi, E.; Deschamps, J.C.; Qureshi, A.G. A multi-commodity network flow model for sustainable performance evaluation in city logistics: Application to the distribution of multi-tenant buildings in Tokyo. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 2180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Olapiriyakul, S.; Nguyen, T.T. Land use and public health impact assessment in a supply chain network design problem: A case study. J. Transp. Geogr. 2019 , 75 , 70–81. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Giordano, A.; Fischbeck, P.; Matthews, H.S. Environmental and economic comparison of diesel and battery electric delivery vans to inform city logistics fleet replacement strategies. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018 , 64 , 216–229. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jones, J.; Genovese, A.; Tob-Ogu, A. Hydrogen vehicles in urban logistics: A total cost of ownership analysis and some policy implications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020 , 119 , 109595. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Azad, M.; Rose, W.J.; MacArthur, J.H.; Cherry, C.R. E-trikes for urban delivery: An empirical mixed-fleet simulation approach to assess city logistics sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023 , 96 , 104641. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jaegler, A.; Randrianarisoa, L.M.; Yahyaoui, H. Policy decision-support for inland waterway transport in sustainable urban areas: An analysis of economic viability. Ann. Oper. Res. 2024 , 1–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E.; Nigro, M.; Serafini, S. Sustainable urban freight transport adopting public transport-based crowdshipping for B2C deliveries. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019 , 11 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Villa, R.; Monzón, A. A metro-based system as sustainable alternative for urban logistics in the era of e-commerce. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 4479. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Akbar, U.; Jain, A.A.; Bråthen, S. Sustainability assessment of inter-urban crowdshipping-A case study approach. Res. Transp. Econ. 2024 , 103 , 101409. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aloui, A.; Hamani, N.; Delahoche, L. An integrated optimization approach using a collaborative strategy for sustainable cities freight transportation: A Case study. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021 , 75 , 103331. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Arnold, F.; Cardenas, I.; Sörensen, K.; Dewulf, W. Simulation of B2C e-commerce distribution in Antwerp using cargo bikes and delivery points. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2018 , 10 , 2. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bi, K.; Yang, M.; Zahid, L.; Zhou, X. A new solution for city distribution to achieve environmental benefits within the trend of green logistics: A case study in China. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 8312. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Büttgen, A.; Turan, B.; Hemmelmayr, V. Evaluating distribution costs and co2-emissions of a two-stage distribution system with cargo bikes: A case study in the city of innsbruck. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 13974. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ceccato, R.; Gastaldi, M. Last mile distribution using cargo bikes: A simulation study in Padova. Eur. Transp./Trasp. Eur. 2023 , 90 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, Y.; Guo, D.; Chen, Z.; Fan, Y.; Li, X. Using a multi-objective programming model to validate feasibility of an underground freight transportation system for the Yangshan port in Shanghai. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018 , 81 , 463–471. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dupas, R.; Deschamps, J.C.; Taniguchi, E.; Qureshi, A.G.; Hsu, T. Optimizing the location selection of urban consolidation centers with sustainability considerations in the city of Bordeaux. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2023 , 47 , 100943. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fan, L. A hybrid adaptive large neighborhood search for time-dependent open electric vehicle routing problem with hybrid energy replenishment strategies. PLoS ONE 2023 , 18 , e0291473. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fontaine, P.; Minner, S.; Schiffer, M. Smart and sustainable city logistics: Design, consolidation, and regulation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2023 , 307 , 1071–1084. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E.; Nigro, M.; Patella, S.M.; Serafini, S. Public transport-based crowdshipping for sustainable city logistics: Assessing economic and environmental impacts. Sustainability 2018 , 11 , 145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gruzauskas, V.; Burinskiene, A.; Krisciunas, A. Application of information-sharing for resilient and sustainable food delivery in last-mile logistics. Mathematics 2023 , 11 , 303. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guo, X.; Jaramillo, Y.J.L.; Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.; Claassen, G.D.H. On integrating crowdsourced delivery in last-mile logistics: A simulation study to quantify its feasibility. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 241 , 118365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hassouna, F.M. Urban freight transport electrification in westbank, palestine: Environmental and economic benefits. Energies 2022 , 15 , 4058. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kłodawski, M.; Jachimowski, R.; Chamier-Gliszczyński, N. Analysis of the overhead crane energy consumption using different container loading strategies in urban logistics hubs. Energies 2024 , 17 , 985. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kwasiborska, A.; Stelmach, A.; Jabłońska, I. Quantitative and comparative analysis of energy consumption in urban logistics using unmanned aerial vehicles and selected means of transport. Energies 2023 , 16 , 6467. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Labarthe, O.; Ahmadi, G.; Klibi, W.; Deschamps, J.C.; Montreuil, B. A sustainable on-demand urban delivery service enabled by synchromodality and synergy in passenger and freight mobility. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2024 , 161 , 104544. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leyerer, M.; Sonneberg, M.O.; Heumann, M.; Breitner, M.H. Shortening the last mile in urban areas: Optimizing a smart logistics concept for e-grocery operations. Smart Cities 2020 , 3 , 585–603. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, D.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Kaisar, E.I. Design of sustainable urban electronic grocery distribution network. Alex. Eng. J. 2021 , 60 , 145–157. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, H.; Yang, R.; Li, X. Delivery routing for a mixed fleet of conventional and electric vehicles with road restrictions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2024 , 1–24. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Märzinger, T.; Wöss, D.; Steinmetz, P.; Müller, W.; Pröll, T. Novel modelling approach for the calculation of the loading performance of charging stations for e-trucks to represent fleet consumption. Energies 2021 , 14 , 3471. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moll, C.; Plötz, P.; Hadwich, K.; Wietschel, M. Are battery-electric trucks for 24-hour delivery the future of city logistics?—A German case study. World Electr. Veh. J. 2020 , 11 , 16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nocera, S.; Cavallaro, F. A two-step method to evaluate the well-to-wheel carbon efficiency of urban consolidation centres. Res. Transp. Econ. 2017 , 65 , 44–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peng, D.; Wu, G.; Boriboonsomsin, K. Bi-objective battery electric truck dispatching problem with backhauls and time windows. Transp. Res. Rec. 2024 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peppel, M.; Spinler, S. The impact of optimal parcel locker locations on costs and the environment. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2022 , 52 , 324–350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Perera, L.; Thompson, R.G.; Wu, W. A multi-class toll-based approach to reduce total emissions on roads for sustainable urban transportation. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020 , 63 , 102435. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pietrzak, K.; Pietrzak, O.; Montwiłł, A. Effects of incorporating rail transport into a zero-emission urban deliveries system: Application of light freight railway (L.F.R.) electric trains. Energies 2021 , 14 , 6809. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pilati, F.; Zennaro, I.; Battini, D.; Persona, A. The sustainable parcel delivery (S.P.D.) problem: Economic and environmental considerations for 3PLs. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 71880–71892. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ramirez-Villamil, A.; Jaegler, A.; Montoya-Torres, J.R. Sustainable local pickup and delivery: The case of Paris. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2022 , 45 , 100692. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ramírez-Villamil, A.; Montoya-Torres, J.R.; Jaegler, A.; Cuevas-Torres, J.M. Reconfiguration of last-mile supply chain for parcel delivery using machine learning and routing optimization. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2023 , 184 , 109604. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Resat, H.G. Design and analysis of novel hybrid multi-objective optimization approach for data-driven sustainable delivery systems. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 90280–90293. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saeedi, F.; Teimoury, E.; Makui, A. Designing sustainable city logistics distribution network using a probabilistic bi-objective mathematical model. Uncertain Supply Chain. Manag. 2018 , 6 , 357–374. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Simoni, M.D.; Marcucci, E.; Gatta, V.; Claudel, C.G. Potential last-mile impacts of crowdshipping services: A simulation-based evaluation. Transportation 2020 , 47 , 1933–1954. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Teimoury, E.; Rashid, R. A hybrid variable neighborhood search heuristic for the sustainable time-dependent truck-drone routing problem with rendezvous locations. J. Heuristics 2024 , 30 , 1–41. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vajihi, M.; Ricci, S. Energy efficiency assessment of rail freight transport: Freight tram in Berlin. Energies 2021 , 14 , 3982. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Voegl, J.; Fikar, C.; Hirsch, P.; Gronalt, M. A simulation study to evaluate economic and environmental effects of different unloading infrastructure in an urban retail street. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019 , 137 , 106032. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, C. Evaluating the effects of logistics center location: An analytical framework for sustainable urban logistics. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 3091. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, M.; Cheah, L. Prioritizing outlier parcels for public transport-based crowdshipping in urban logistics. Transp. Res. Rec. 2024 , 2678 , 601–612. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Parmaksız, D.; Ülkü, M.A.; Weigand, H. Investigating rural logistics and transportation through the lens of quadruple bottom line sustainability. Logistics 2024 , 8 , 81. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Toktaş, D.; Ülkü, M.A.; Habib, M.A. Toward Greener Supply Chains by Decarbonizing City Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Pathways. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177516

Toktaş D, Ülkü MA, Habib MA. Toward Greener Supply Chains by Decarbonizing City Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Pathways. Sustainability . 2024; 16(17):7516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177516

Toktaş, Doğukan, M. Ali Ülkü, and Muhammad Ahsanul Habib. 2024. "Toward Greener Supply Chains by Decarbonizing City Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Pathways" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177516

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals