document analysis in research

Document Analysis

• First Online: 02 January 2023

Cite this chapter

• Benjamin Kutsyuruba 4  

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Education ((SPTE))

6316 Accesses

2 Citations

This chapter describes the document analysis approach. As a qualitative method, document analysis entails a systematic procedure for reviewing and evaluating documents through finding, selecting, appraising (making sense of), and synthesizing data contained within them. This chapter outlines the brief history, method and use of document analysis, provides an outline of its process, strengths and limitations, and application, and offers further readings, resources, and suggestions for student engagement activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Qualitative Text Analysis: A Systematic Approach

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners

Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures

Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10 (1), 65–77.

Article   Google Scholar  

Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis . SAGE.

Google Scholar  

Altheide, D. L. (2000). Tracking discourse and qualitative document analysis. Poetics, 27 , 287–299.

Atkinson, P. A., & Coffey, A. (1997). Analysing documentary realities. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 45–62). SAGE.

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for social sciences . Allyn and Bacon.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0902027

Bryman, A. (2003). Research methods and organization studies . Routledge.

Book   Google Scholar  

Cardno, C. (2018). Policy document analysis: A practical educational leadership tool and a qualitative research method. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice , 24 (4), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2018.016

Caulley, D. N. (1983). Document analysis in program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 6 , 19–29.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference . Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research . Aldine De Gruyter.

Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Longman.

Goode, W. J., & Hatt, P. K. (1952). Methods in social research . McGraw-Hill.

Hodder, I. (2000). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 703–715). SAGE.

Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE.

Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28 , 587–604.

Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2010). Practical resources for assessing and reporting intercoder reliability in content analysis research projects . Retrieved March 20, 2011, from http://matthewlombard.com/reliability/index_print.html

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative social research (Vol. 1(2)). Retrieved March 22, 2011, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/1089/2385

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.

Merriam, S. B. (1988a). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach . Jossey-Bass.

Merriam, S. B. (1998b). Case study research in education . Jossey-Bass.

Miller, F. A., & Alvarado, K. (2005). Incorporating documents into qualitative nursing research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37 (4), 348–353.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook . SAGE.

O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research . SAGE.

Prior, L. (2008a). Document analysis. In L. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopaedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 231–232). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909

Prior, L. (2008b). Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology, 42 (5), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094564

Prior, L. (2012). The role of documents in social research. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 426–438). Edward Elgar.

Salminen, A., Kauppinen, K., & Lehtovaara, M. (1997). Towards a methodology for document analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (7), 644–655.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research . SAGE.

Wharton, C. (2006). Document analysis. In V. Jupp (Ed.), The SAGE dictionary of social research methods (pp. 80–81). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020116

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research, design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

Additional Reading

Kutsyuruba, B. (2017). Examining education reforms through document analysis methodology. In I. Silova, A. Korzh, S. Kovalchuk, & N. Sobe (Eds.), Reimagining Utopias: Theory and method for educational research in post-socialist contexts (pp. 199–214). Sense.

Kutsyuruba, B., Christou, T., Heggie, L., Murray, J., & Deluca, C. (2015). Teacher collaborative inquiry in Ontario: An analysis of provincial and school board policies and support documents. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 172 , 1–38.

Kutsyuruba, B., Godden, L., & Tregunna, L. (2014). Curbing the early-career attrition: A pan-Canadian document analysis of teacher induction and mentorship programs. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 161 , 1–42.

Segeren, A., & Kutsyuruba, B. (2012). Twenty years and counting: An examination of the development of equity and inclusive education policy in Ontario (1990–2010). Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 136 , 1–38.

Online Resources

Document Analysis: A How To Guide (12:27 min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOsE9saR_ck

Document Analysis with Philip Adu (1:16:40 min) https://youtu.be/bLKBffW5JPU

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

Benjamin Kutsyuruba

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Kutsyuruba .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Educational Administration, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Janet Mola Okoko

Scott Tunison

Department of Educational Administration, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Keith D. Walker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Kutsyuruba, B. (2023). Document Analysis. In: Okoko, J.M., Tunison, S., Walker, K.D. (eds) Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_23

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_23

Published : 02 January 2023

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-04396-3

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-04394-9

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Document Analysis - How to Analyze Text Data for Research

Introduction

What is document analysis, where is document analysis used, how to perform document analysis, what is text analysis, atlas.ti as text analysis software.

In qualitative research , you can collect primary data through surveys , observations , or interviews , to name a few examples. In addition, you can rely on document analysis when the data already exists in secondary sources like books, public reports, or other archival records that are relevant to your research inquiry.

In this article, we will look at the role of document analysis, the relationship between document analysis and text analysis, and how text analysis software like ATLAS.ti can help you conduct qualitative research.

Document analysis is a systematic procedure used in qualitative research to review and interpret the information embedded in written materials. These materials, often referred to as “documents,” can encompass a wide range of physical and digital sources, such as newspapers, diaries, letters, policy documents, contracts, reports, transcripts, and many others.

At its core, document analysis involves critically examining these sources to gather insightful data and understand the context in which they were created. Research can perform sentiment analysis , text mining, and text categorization, to name a few methods. The goal is not just to derive facts from the documents, but also to understand the underlying nuances, motivations, and perspectives that they represent. For instance, a historical researcher may examine old letters not just to get a chronological account of events, but also to understand the emotions, beliefs, and values of people during that era.

Benefits of document analysis

There are several advantages to using document analysis in research:

• Authenticity : Since documents are typically created for purposes other than research, they can offer an unobtrusive and genuine insight into the topic at hand, without the potential biases introduced by direct observation or interviews.
• Availability : Documents, especially those in the public domain, are widely accessible, making it easier for researchers to source information.
• Cost-effectiveness : As these documents already exist, researchers can save time and resources compared to other data collection methods.

However, document analysis is not without challenges. One must ensure the documents are authentic and reliable. Furthermore, the researcher must be adept at discerning between objective facts and subjective interpretations present in the document.

Document analysis is a versatile method in qualitative research that offers a lens into the intricate layers of meaning, context, and perspective found within textual materials. Through careful and systematic examination, it unveils the richness and depth of the information housed in documents, providing a unique dimension to research findings.

Document analysis is employed in a myriad of sectors, serving various purposes to generate actionable insights. Whether it's understanding customer sentiments or gleaning insights from historical records, this method offers valuable information. Here are some examples of how document analysis is applied.

Analyzing surveys and their responses

A common use of document analysis in the business world revolves around customer surveys . These surveys are designed to collect data on the customer experience, seeking to understand how products or services meet or fall short of customer expectations.

By analyzing customer survey responses , companies can identify areas of improvement, gauge satisfaction levels, and make informed decisions to enhance the customer experience. Even if customer service teams designed a survey for a specific purpose, text analytics of the responses can focus on different angles to gather insights for new research questions.

Examining customer feedback through social media posts

In today's digital age, social media is a goldmine of customer feedback. Customers frequently share their experiences, both positive and negative, on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.

Through document analysis of social media posts, companies can get a real-time pulse of their customer sentiments. This not only helps in immediate issue resolution but also in shaping product or service strategies to align with customer preferences.

Interpreting customer support tickets

Another rich source of data is customer support tickets. These tickets often contain detailed descriptions of issues faced by customers, their frustrations, or sometimes their appreciation for assistance received.

By employing document analysis on these tickets, businesses can detect patterns, identify recurring issues, and work towards streamlining their support processes. This ensures a smoother and more satisfying customer experience.

Historical research and social studies

Beyond the world of business, document analysis plays a pivotal role in historical and social research. Scholars analyze old manuscripts, letters, and other archival materials to construct a narrative of past events, cultures, and civilizations.

As a result, document analysis is an ideal method for historical research since generating new data is less feasible than turning to existing sources for analysis. Researchers can not only examine historical narratives but also how those narratives were constructed in their own time.

Turn to ATLAS.ti for your data analysis needs

Try out our powerful data analysis tools with a free trial to make the most out of your data today.

Performing document analysis is a structured process that ensures researchers can derive meaningful, qualitative insights by organizing source material into structured data . Here's a brief outline of the process:

• Define the research question
• Choose relevant documents
• Prepare and organize the documents
• Begin initial review and coding
• Analyze and interpret the data
• Present findings and draw conclusions

The process in detail

Before diving into the documents, it's crucial to have a clear research question or objective. This serves as the foundation for the entire analysis and guides the selection and review of documents. A well-defined question will focus the research, ensuring that the document analysis is targeted and relevant.

The next step is to identify and select documents that align with the research question. It's vital to ensure that these documents are credible, reliable, and pertinent to the research inquiry. The chosen materials can vary from official reports, personal diaries, to digital resources like social media data , depending on the nature of the research.

Once the documents are selected, they need to be organized in a manner that facilitates smooth analysis. This could mean categorizing documents by themes, chronology, or source types. Digital tools and data analysis software , such as ATLAS.ti, can assist in this phase, making the organization more efficient and helping researchers locate specific data when needed.

With everything in place, the researcher starts an initial review of the documents. During this phase, the emphasis is on identifying patterns, themes, or specific information relevant to the research question.

Coding involves assigning labels or tags to sections of the text to categorize the information. This step is iterative, and codes can be refined as the researcher delves deeper.

After coding, interesting patterns across codes can be analyzed. Here, researchers seek to draw meaningful connections between codes, identify overarching themes, and interpret the data in the context of the research question .

This is where the hidden insights and deeper understanding emerge, as researchers juxtapose various pieces of information and infer meaning from them.

Finally, after the intensive process of document analysis, the researcher consolidates their findings, crafting a narrative or report that presents the results. This might also involve visual representations like charts or graphs, especially when demonstrating patterns or trends.

Drawing conclusions involves synthesizing the insights gained from the analysis and offering answers or perspectives in relation to the original research question.

Ultimately, document analysis is a meticulous and iterative procedure. But with a clear plan and systematic approach, it becomes a potent tool in the researcher's arsenal, allowing them to uncover profound insights from textual data.

Text analysis, often referenced alongside document analysis, is a method that focuses on extracting meaningful information from textual data. While document analysis revolves around reviewing and interpreting data from various sources, text analysis hones in on the intricate details within these documents, enabling a deeper understanding. Both these methods are vital in fields such as linguistics, literature, social sciences, and business analytics.

In the context of document analysis, text analysis emerges as a nuanced exploration of the textual content. After documents have been sourced, be it from books, articles, social networks, or any other medium, they undergo a preprocessing phase. Here, irrelevant information is eliminated, errors are rectified, and the text may be translated or converted to ensure uniformity.

This cleaned text is then tokenized into smaller units like words or phrases, facilitating a granular review. Techniques specific to text analysis, such as topic modeling to determine discussed subjects or pattern recognition to identify trends, are applied.

The derived insights can be visualized using tools like graphs or charts, offering a clearer understanding of the content's depth. Interpretation follows, allowing researchers to draw actionable insights or theoretical conclusions based on both the broader document context and the specific text analysis.

Merging text analysis with document analysis presents unique challenges. With the proliferation of digital content, managing vast data sets becomes a significant hurdle. The inherent variability of language, laden with cultural nuances, idioms, and sometimes sarcasm, can make precise interpretation elusive.

Many text analysis tools exist that can facilitate the analytical process. ATLAS.ti offers a well-rounded, useful solution as a text analytics software . In this section, we'll highlight some of the tools that can help you conduct document analysis.

Word Frequencies

A word cloud can be a powerful text analytics tool to understand the nature of human language as it pertains to a particular context. Researchers can perform text mining on their unstructured text data to get a sense of what is being discussed. The Word Frequencies tool can also parse out specific parts of speech, facilitating more granular text extraction.

Sentiment Analysis

The Sentiment Analysis tool employs natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning to analyze text based on sentiment and facilitate natural language understanding. This is important for tasks such as, for example, analyzing customer reviews and assessing customer satisfaction, because you can quickly categorize large numbers of customer data records by their positive or negative sentiment.

AI Coding relies on massive amounts of training data to interpret text and automatically code large amounts of qualitative data. Rather than read each and every document line by line, you can turn to AI Coding to process your data and devote time to the more essential tasks of analysis such as critical reflection and interpretation.

These text analytics tools can be a powerful complement to research. When you're conducting document analysis to understand the meaning of text, AI Coding can help with providing a code structure or organization of data that helps to identify deeper insights.

AI Summaries

Dealing with large numbers of discrete documents can be a daunting task if done manually, especially if each document in your data set is lengthy and complicated. Simplifying the meaning of documents down to their essential insights can help researchers identify patterns in the data.

AI Summaries fills this role by using natural language processing algorithms to simplify data to its salient points. Text generated by AI Summaries are stored in memos attached to documents to illustrate pathways to coding and analysis or to highlight how the data conveys meaning.

Take advantage of ATLAS.ti's analysis tools with a free trial

Let our powerful data analysis interface make the most out of your data. Download a free trial today.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Documentary Analysis – Methods, Applications and Examples

Documentary Analysis – Methods, Applications and Examples

Table of Contents

Documentary Analysis

Definition:

Documentary analysis, also referred to as document analysis , is a systematic procedure for reviewing or evaluating documents. This method involves a detailed review of the documents to extract themes or patterns relevant to the research topic .

Documents used in this type of analysis can include a wide variety of materials such as text (words) and images that have been recorded without a researcher’s intervention. The domain of document analysis, therefore, includes all kinds of texts – books, newspapers, letters, study reports, diaries, and more, as well as images like maps, photographs, and films.

Documentary analysis provides valuable insight and a unique perspective on the past, contextualizing the present and providing a baseline for future studies. It is also an essential tool in case studies and when direct observation or participant observation is not possible.

The process usually involves several steps:

• Sourcing : This involves identifying the document or source, its origin, and the context in which it was created.
• Contextualizing : This involves understanding the social, economic, political, and cultural circumstances during the time the document was created.
• Interrogating : This involves asking a series of questions to help understand the document better. For example, who is the author? What is the purpose of the document? Who is the intended audience?
• Making inferences : This involves understanding what the document says (either directly or indirectly) about the topic under study.
• Checking for reliability and validity : Just like other research methods, documentary analysis also involves checking for the validity and reliability of the documents being analyzed.

Documentary Analysis Methods

Documentary analysis as a qualitative research method involves a systematic process. Here are the main steps you would generally follow:

Defining the Research Question

Before you start any research , you need a clear and focused research question . This will guide your decision on what documents you need to analyze and what you’re looking for within them.

Selecting the Documents

Once you know what you’re looking for, you can start to select the relevant documents. These can be a wide range of materials – books, newspapers, letters, official reports, diaries, transcripts of speeches, archival materials, websites, social media posts, and more. They can be primary sources (directly from the time/place/person you are studying) or secondary sources (analyses created by others).

Reading and Interpreting the Documents

You need to closely read the selected documents to identify the themes and patterns that relate to your research question. This might involve content analysis (looking at what is explicitly stated) and discourse analysis (looking at what is implicitly stated or implied). You need to understand the context in which the document was created, the author’s purpose, and the audience’s perspective.

Coding and Categorizing the Data

After the initial reading, the data (text) can be broken down into smaller parts or “codes.” These codes can then be categorized based on their similarities and differences. This process of coding helps in organizing the data and identifying patterns or themes.

Analyzing the Data

Once the data is organized, it can be analyzed to make sense of it. This can involve comparing the data with existing theories, examining relationships between categories, or explaining the data in relation to the research question.

Validating the Findings

The researcher needs to ensure that the findings are accurate and credible. This might involve triangulating the data (comparing it with other sources or types of data), considering alternative explanations, or seeking feedback from others.

Reporting the Findings

The final step is to report the findings in a clear, structured way. This should include a description of the methods used, the findings, and the researcher’s interpretations and conclusions.

Applications of Documentary Analysis

Documentary analysis is widely used across a variety of fields and disciplines due to its flexible and comprehensive nature. Here are some specific applications:

Historical Research

Documentary analysis is a fundamental method in historical research. Historians use documents to reconstruct past events, understand historical contexts, and interpret the motivations and actions of historical figures. Documents analyzed may include personal letters, diaries, official records, newspaper articles, photographs, and more.

Social Science Research

Sociologists, anthropologists, and political scientists use documentary analysis to understand social phenomena, cultural practices, political events, and more. This might involve analyzing government policies, organizational records, media reports, social media posts, and other documents.

Legal Research

In law, documentary analysis is used in case analysis and statutory interpretation. Legal practitioners and scholars analyze court decisions, statutes, regulations, and other legal documents.

Business and Market Research

Companies often analyze documents to gather business intelligence, understand market trends, and make strategic decisions. This might involve analyzing competitor reports, industry news, market research studies, and more.

Media and Communication Studies

Scholars in these fields might analyze media content (e.g., news reports, advertisements, social media posts) to understand media narratives, public opinion, and communication practices.

Literary and Film Studies

In these fields, the “documents” might be novels, poems, films, or scripts. Scholars analyze these texts to interpret their meaning, understand their cultural context, and critique their form and content.

Educational Research

Educational researchers may analyze curricula, textbooks, lesson plans, and other educational documents to understand educational practices and policies.

Health Research

Health researchers may analyze medical records, health policies, clinical guidelines, and other documents to study health behaviors, healthcare delivery, and health outcomes.

Examples of Documentary Analysis

Some Examples of Documentary Analysis might be:

• Example 1 : A historian studying the causes of World War I might analyze diplomatic correspondence, government records, newspaper articles, and personal diaries from the period leading up to the war.
• Example 2 : A policy analyst trying to understand the impact of a new public health policy might analyze the policy document itself, as well as related government reports, statements from public health officials, and news media coverage of the policy.
• Example 3 : A market researcher studying consumer trends might analyze social media posts, customer reviews, industry reports, and news articles related to the market they’re studying.
• Example 4 : An education researcher might analyze curriculum documents, textbooks, and lesson plans to understand how a particular subject is being taught in schools. They might also analyze policy documents to understand the broader educational policy context.
• Example 5 : A criminologist studying hate crimes might analyze police reports, court records, news reports, and social media posts to understand patterns in hate crimes, as well as societal and institutional responses to them.
• Example 6 : A journalist writing a feature article on homelessness might analyze government reports on homelessness, policy documents related to housing and social services, news articles on homelessness, and social media posts from people experiencing homelessness.
• Example 7 : A literary critic studying a particular author might analyze their novels, letters, interviews, and reviews of their work to gain insight into their themes, writing style, influences, and reception.

When to use Documentary Analysis

Documentary analysis can be used in a variety of research contexts, including but not limited to:

• When direct access to research subjects is limited : If you are unable to conduct interviews or observations due to geographical, logistical, or ethical constraints, documentary analysis can provide an alternative source of data.
• When studying the past : Documents can provide a valuable window into historical events, cultures, and perspectives. This is particularly useful when the people involved in these events are no longer available for interviews or when physical evidence is lacking.
• When corroborating other sources of data : If you have collected data through interviews, surveys, or observations, analyzing documents can provide additional evidence to support or challenge your findings. This process of triangulation can enhance the validity of your research.
• When seeking to understand the context : Documents can provide background information that helps situate your research within a broader social, cultural, historical, or institutional context. This can be important for interpreting your other data and for making your research relevant to a wider audience.
• When the documents are the focus of the research : In some cases, the documents themselves might be the subject of your research. For example, you might be studying how a particular topic is represented in the media, how an author’s work has evolved over time, or how a government policy was developed.
• When resources are limited : Compared to methods like experiments or large-scale surveys, documentary analysis can often be conducted with relatively limited resources. It can be a particularly useful method for students, independent researchers, and others who are working with tight budgets.
• When providing an audit trail for future researchers : Documents provide a record of events, decisions, or conditions at specific points in time. They can serve as an audit trail for future researchers who want to understand the circumstances surrounding a particular event or period.

Purpose of Documentary Analysis

The purpose of documentary analysis in research can be multifold. Here are some key reasons why a researcher might choose to use this method:

• Understanding Context : Documents can provide rich contextual information about the period, environment, or culture under investigation. This can be especially useful for historical research, where the context is often key to understanding the events or trends being studied.
• Direct Source of Data : Documents can serve as primary sources of data. For instance, a letter from a historical figure can give unique insights into their thoughts, feelings, and motivations. A company’s annual report can offer firsthand information about its performance and strategy.
• Corroboration and Verification : Documentary analysis can be used to validate and cross-verify findings derived from other research methods. For example, if interviews suggest a particular outcome, relevant documents can be reviewed to confirm the accuracy of this finding.
• Substituting for Other Methods : When access to the field or subjects is not possible due to various constraints (geographical, logistical, or ethical), documentary analysis can serve as an alternative to methods like observation or interviews.
• Unobtrusive Method : Unlike some other research methods, documentary analysis doesn’t require interaction with subjects, and therefore doesn’t risk altering the behavior of those subjects.
• Longitudinal Analysis : Documents can be used to study change over time. For example, a researcher might analyze census data from multiple decades to study demographic changes.
• Providing Rich, Qualitative Data : Documents often provide qualitative data that can help researchers understand complex issues in depth. For example, a policy document might reveal not just the details of the policy, but also the underlying beliefs and attitudes that shaped it.

Advantages of Documentary Analysis

Documentary analysis offers several advantages as a research method:

• Unobtrusive : As a non-reactive method, documentary analysis does not require direct interaction with human subjects, which means that the research doesn’t affect or influence the subjects’ behavior.
• Rich Historical and Contextual Data : Documents can provide a wealth of historical and contextual information. They allow researchers to examine events and perspectives from the past, even from periods long before modern research methods were established.
• Efficiency and Accessibility : Many documents are readily accessible, especially with the proliferation of digital archives and databases. This accessibility can often make documentary analysis a more efficient method than others that require data collection from human subjects.
• Cost-Effective : Compared to other methods, documentary analysis can be relatively inexpensive. It generally requires fewer resources than conducting experiments, surveys, or fieldwork.
• Permanent Record : Documents provide a permanent record that can be reviewed multiple times. This allows for repeated analysis and verification of the data.
• Versatility : A wide variety of documents can be analyzed, from historical texts to contemporary digital content, providing flexibility and applicability to a broad range of research questions and fields.
• Ability to Cross-Verify (Triangulate) Data : Documentary analysis can be used alongside other methods as a means of triangulating data, thus adding validity and reliability to the research.

Limitations of Documentary Analysis

While documentary analysis offers several benefits as a research method, it also has its limitations. It’s important to keep these in mind when deciding to use documentary analysis and when interpreting your findings:

• Authenticity : Not all documents are genuine, and sometimes it can be challenging to verify the authenticity of a document, particularly for historical research.
• Bias and Subjectivity : All documents are products of their time and their authors. They may reflect personal, cultural, political, or institutional biases, and these biases can affect the information they contain and how it is presented.
• Incomplete or Missing Information : Documents may not provide all the information you need for your research. There may be gaps in the record, or crucial information may have been omitted, intentionally or unintentionally.
• Access and Availability : Not all documents are readily available for analysis. Some may be restricted due to privacy, confidentiality, or security considerations. Others may be difficult to locate or access, particularly historical documents that haven’t been digitized.
• Interpretation : Interpreting documents, particularly historical ones, can be challenging. You need to understand the context in which the document was created, including the social, cultural, political, and personal factors that might have influenced its content.
• Time-Consuming : While documentary analysis can be cost-effective, it can also be time-consuming, especially if you have a large number of documents to analyze or if the documents are lengthy or complex.
• Lack of Control Over Data : Unlike methods where the researcher collects the data themselves (e.g., through experiments or surveys), with documentary analysis, you have no control over what data is available. You are reliant on what others have chosen to record and preserve.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Descriptive Statistics – Types, Methods and...

Textual Analysis – Types, Examples and Guide

Correlation Analysis – Types, Methods and...

Phenomenology – Methods, Examples and Guide

Critical Analysis – Types, Examples and Writing...

Cluster Analysis – Types, Methods and Examples

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Health Policy Plan
• v.35(10); 2020 Dec

Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach

Sarah l dalglish.

1 Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

2 Institute for Global Health, University College London, Institute for Global Health 3rd floor, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

Hina Khalid

3 School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Information Technology University, Arfa Software Technology Park, Ferozepur Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan

Shannon A McMahon

4 Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130/3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Associated Data

Document analysis is one of the most commonly used and powerful methods in health policy research. While existing qualitative research manuals offer direction for conducting document analysis, there has been little specific discussion about how to use this method to understand and analyse health policy. Drawing on guidance from other disciplines and our own research experience, we present a systematic approach for document analysis in health policy research called the READ approach: (1) ready your materials, (2) extract data, (3) analyse data and (4) distil your findings. We provide practical advice on each step, with consideration of epistemological and theoretical issues such as the socially constructed nature of documents and their role in modern bureaucracies. We provide examples of document analysis from two case studies from our work in Pakistan and Niger in which documents provided critical insight and advanced empirical and theoretical understanding of a health policy issue. Coding tools for each case study are included as Supplementary Files to inspire and guide future research. These case studies illustrate the value of rigorous document analysis to understand policy content and processes and discourse around policy, in ways that are either not possible using other methods, or greatly enrich other methods such as in-depth interviews and observation. Given the central nature of documents to health policy research and importance of reading them critically, the READ approach provides practical guidance on gaining the most out of documents and ensuring rigour in document analysis.

Key Messages

• Rigour in qualitative research is judged partly by the use of deliberate, systematic procedures; however, little specific guidance is available for analysing documents, a nonetheless common method in health policy research.
• Document analysis is useful for understanding policy content across time and geographies, documenting processes, triangulating with interviews and other sources of data, understanding how information and ideas are presented formally, and understanding issue framing, among other purposes.
• The READ (Ready materials, Extract data, Analyse data, Distil) approach provides a step-by-step guide to conducting document analysis for qualitative policy research.
• The READ approach can be adapted to different purposes and types of research, two examples of which are presented in this article, with sample tools in the Supplementary Materials .

Introduction

Document analysis (also called document review) is one of the most commonly used methods in health policy research; it is nearly impossible to conduct policy research without it. Writing in early 20th century, Weber (2015) identified the importance of formal, written documents as a key characteristic of the bureaucracies by which modern societies function, including in public health. Accordingly, critical social research has a long tradition of documentary review: Marx analysed official reports, laws, statues, census reports and newspapers and periodicals over a nearly 50-year period to come to his world-altering conclusions ( Harvey, 1990 ). Yet in much of social science research, ‘documents are placed at the margins of consideration,’ with privilege given to the spoken word via methods such as interviews, possibly due to the fact that many qualitative methods were developed in the anthropological tradition to study mainly pre-literate societies ( Prior, 2003 ). To date, little specific guidance is available to help health policy researchers make the most of these wells of information.

The term ‘documents’ is defined here broadly, following Prior, as physical or virtual artefacts designed by creators, for users, to function within a particular setting ( Prior, 2003 ). Documents exist not as standalone objects of study but must be understood in the social web of meaning within which they are produced and consumed. For example, some analysts distinguish between public documents (produced in the context of public sector activities), private documents (from business and civil society) and personal documents (created by or for individuals, and generally not meant for public consumption) ( Mogalakwe, 2009 ). Documents can be used in a number of ways throughout the research process ( Bowen, 2009 ). In the planning or study design phase, they can be used to gather background information and help refine the research question. Documents can also be used to spark ideas for disseminating research once it is complete, by observing the ways those who will use the research speak to and communicate ideas with one another.

Documents can also be used during data collection and analysis to help answer research questions. Recent health policy research shows that this can be done in at least four ways. Frequently, policy documents are reviewed to describe the content or categorize the approaches to specific health problems in existing policies, as in reviews of the composition of drowning prevention resources in the United States or policy responses to foetal alcohol spectrum disorder in South Africa ( Katchmarchi et al. , 2018 ; Adebiyi et al. , 2019 ). In other cases, non-policy documents are used to examine the implementation of health policies in real-world settings, as in a review of web sources and newspapers analysing the functioning of community health councils in New Zealand ( Gurung et al. , 2020 ). Perhaps less frequently, document analysis is used to analyse policy processes, as in an assessment of multi-sectoral planning process for nutrition in Burkina Faso ( Ouedraogo et al. , 2020 ). Finally, and most broadly, document analysis can be used to inform new policies, as in one study that assessed cigarette sticks as communication and branding ‘documents,’ to suggest avenues for further regulation and tobacco control activities ( Smith et al. , 2017 ).

This practice paper provides an overarching method for conducting document analysis, which can be adapted to a multitude of research questions and topics. Document analysis is used in most or all policy studies; the aim of this article is to provide a systematized method that will enhance procedural rigour. We provide an overview of document analysis, drawing on guidance from disciplines adjacent to public health, introduce the ‘READ’ approach to document analysis and provide two short case studies demonstrating how document analysis can be applied.

What is document analysis?

Document analysis is a systematic procedure for reviewing or evaluating documents, which can be used to provide context, generate questions, supplement other types of research data, track change over time and corroborate other sources ( Bowen, 2009 ). In one commonly cited approach in social research, Bowen recommends first skimming the documents to get an overview, then reading to identify relevant categories of analysis for the overall set of documents and finally interpreting the body of documents ( Bowen, 2009 ). Document analysis can include both quantitative and qualitative components: the approach presented here can be used with either set of methods, but we emphasize qualitative ones, which are more adapted to the socially constructed meaning-making inherent to collaborative exercises such as policymaking.

The study of documents as a research method is common to a number of social science disciplines—yet in many of these fields, including sociology ( Mogalakwe, 2009 ), anthropology ( Prior, 2003 ) and political science ( Wesley, 2010 ), document-based research is described as ill-considered and underutilized. Unsurprisingly, textual analysis is perhaps most developed in fields such as media studies, cultural studies and literary theory, all disciplines that recognize documents as ‘social facts’ that are created, consumed, shared and utilized in socially organized ways ( Atkinson and Coffey, 1997 ). Documents exist within social ‘fields of action,’ a term used to designate the environments within which individuals and groups interact. Documents are therefore not mere records of social life, but integral parts of it—and indeed can become agents in their own right ( Prior, 2003 ). Powerful entities also manipulate the nature and content of knowledge; therefore, gaps in available information must be understood as reflecting and potentially reinforcing societal power relations ( Bryman and Burgess, 1994 ).

Document analysis, like any research method, can be subject to concerns regarding validity, reliability, authenticity, motivated authorship, lack of representativity and so on. However, these can be mitigated or avoided using standard techniques to enhance qualitative rigour, such as triangulation (within documents and across methods and theoretical perspectives), ensuring adequate sample size or ‘engagement’ with the documents, member checking, peer debriefing and so on ( Maxwell, 2005 ).

Document analysis can be used as a standalone method, e.g. to analyse the contents of specific types of policy as they evolve over time and differ across geographies, but document analysis can also be powerfully combined with other types of methods to cross-validate (i.e. triangulate) and deepen the value of concurrent methods. As one guide to public policy research puts it, ‘almost all likely sources of information, data, and ideas fall into two general types: documents and people’ ( Bardach and Patashnik, 2015 ). Thus, researchers can ask interviewees to address questions that arise from policy documents and point the way to useful new documents. Bardach and Patashnik suggest alternating between documents and interviews as sources as information, as one tends to lead to the other, such as by scanning interviewees’ bookshelves and papers for titles and author names ( Bardach and Patashnik, 2015 ). Depending on your research questions, document analysis can be used in combination with different types of interviews ( Berner-Rodoreda et al. , 2018 ), observation ( Harvey, 2018 ), and quantitative analyses, among other common methods in policy research.

The READ approach

The READ approach to document analysis is a systematic procedure for collecting documents and gaining information from them in the context of health policy studies at any level (global, national, local, etc.). The steps consist of: (1) ready your materials, (2) extract data, (3) analyse data and (4) distil your findings. We describe each of these steps in turn.

Step 1. Ready your materials

At the outset, researchers must set parameters in terms of the nature and number (approximately) of documents they plan to analyse, based on the research question. How much time will you allocate to the document analysis, and what is the scope of your research question? Depending on the answers to these questions, criteria should be established around (1) the topic (a particular policy, programme, or health issue, narrowly defined according to the research question); (2) dates of inclusion (whether taking the long view of several decades, or zooming in on a specific event or period in time); and (3) an indicative list of places to search for documents (possibilities include databases such as Ministry archives; LexisNexis or other databases; online searches; and particularly interview subjects). For difficult-to-obtain working documents or otherwise non-public items, bringing a flash drive to interviews is one of the best ways to gain access to valuable documents.

For research focusing on a single policy or programme, you may review only a handful of documents. However, if you are looking at multiple policies, health issues, or contexts, or reviewing shorter documents (such as newspaper articles), you may look at hundreds, or even thousands of documents. When considering the number of documents you will analyse, you should make notes on the type of information you plan to extract from documents—i.e. what it is you hope to learn, and how this will help answer your research question(s). The initial criteria—and the data you seek to extract from documents—will likely evolve over the course of the research, as it becomes clear whether they will yield too few documents and information (a rare outcome), far too many documents and too much information (a much more common outcome) or documents that fail to address the research question; however, it is important to have a starting point to guide the search. If you find that the documents you need are unavailable, you may need to reassess your research questions or consider other methods of inquiry. If you have too many documents, you can either analyse a subset of these ( Panel 1 ) or adopt more stringent inclusion criteria.

Exploring the framing of diseases in Pakistani media

In Table 1 , we present a non-exhaustive list of the types of documents that can be included in document analyses of health policy issues. In most cases, this will mean written sources (policies, reports, articles). The types of documents to be analysed will vary by study and according to the research question, although in many cases, it will be useful to consult a mix of formal documents (such as official policies, laws or strategies), ‘gray literature’ (organizational materials such as reports, evaluations and white papers produced outside formal publication channels) and, whenever possible, informal or working documents (such as meeting notes, PowerPoint presentations and memoranda). These latter in particular can provide rich veins of insight into how policy actors are thinking through the issues under study, particularly for the lucky researcher who obtains working documents with ‘Track Changes.’ How you prioritize documents will depend on your research question: you may prioritize official policy documents if you are studying policy content, or you may prioritize informal documents if you are studying policy process.

Types of documents that can be consulted in studies of health policy

During this initial preparatory phase, we also recommend devising a file-naming system for your documents (e.g. Author.Date.Topic.Institution.PDF), so that documents can be easily retrieved throughout the research process. After extracting data and processing your documents the first time around, you will likely have additional ‘questions’ to ask your documents and need to consult them again. For this reason, it is important to clearly name source files and link filenames to the data that you are extracting (see sample naming conventions in the Supplementary Materials ).

Step 2. Extract data

Data can be extracted in a number of ways, and the method you select for doing so will depend on your research question and the nature of your documents. One simple way is to use an Excel spreadsheet where each row is a document and each column is a category of information you are seeking to extract, from more basic data such as the document title, author and date, to theoretical or conceptual categories deriving from your research question, operating theory or analytical framework (Panel 2). Documents can also be imported into thematic coding software such as Atlas.ti or NVivo, and data extracted that way. Alternatively, if the research question focuses on process, documents can be used to compile a timeline of events, to trace processes across time. Ask yourself, how can I organize these data in the most coherent manner? What are my priority categories? We have included two different examples of data extraction tools in the Supplementary Materials to this article to spark ideas.

Case study Documents tell part of the story in Niger

Document analyses are first and foremost exercises in close reading: documents should be read thoroughly, from start to finish, including annexes, which may seem tedious but which sometimes produce golden nuggets of information. Read for overall meaning as you extract specific data related to your research question. As you go along, you will begin to have ideas or build working theories about what you are learning and observing in the data. We suggest capturing these emerging theories in extended notes or ‘memos,’ as used in Grounded Theory methodology ( Charmaz, 2006 ); these can be useful analytical units in themselves and can also provide a basis for later report and article writing.

As you read more documents, you may find that your data extraction tool needs to be modified to capture all the relevant information (or to avoid wasting time capturing irrelevant information). This may require you to go back and seek information in documents you have already read and processed, which will be greatly facilitated by a coherent file-naming system. It is also useful to keep notes on other documents that are mentioned that should be tracked down (sometimes you can write the author for help). As a general rule, we suggest being parsimonious when selecting initial categories to extract from data. Simply reading the documents takes significant time in and of itself—make sure you think about how, exactly, the specific data you are extracting will be used and how it goes towards answering your research questions.

Step 3. Analyse data

As in all types of qualitative research, data collection and analysis are iterative and characterized by emergent design, meaning that developing findings continually inform whether and how to obtain and interpret data ( Creswell, 2013 ). In practice, this means that during the data extraction phase, the researcher is already analysing data and forming initial theories—as well as potentially modifying document selection criteria. However, only when data extraction is complete can one see the full picture. For example, are there any documents that you would have expected to find, but did not? Why do you think they might be missing? Are there temporal trends (i.e. similarities, differences or evolutions that stand out when documents are ordered chronologically)? What else do you notice? We provide a list of overarching questions you should think about when viewing your body of document as a whole ( Table 2 ).

Questions to ask your overall body of documents

HIV and viral hepatitis articles by main frames (%). Note: The percentage of articles is calculated by dividing the number of articles appearing in each frame for viral hepatitis and HIV by the respectivenumber of sampled articles for each disease (N = 137 for HIV; N = 117 for hepatitis). Time frame: 1 January 2006 to 30 September 2016

Representations of progress toward Millennium Development Goal 4 in Nigerien policy documents. Sources: clockwise from upper left: ( WHO 2006 ); ( Institut National de la Statistique 2010 ); ( Ministè re de la Santé Publique 2010 ); ( Unicef 2010 )

In addition to the meaning-making processes you are already engaged in during the data extraction process, in most cases, it will be useful to apply specific analysis methodologies to the overall corpus of your documents, such as policy analysis ( Buse et al. , 2005 ). An array of analysis methodologies can be used, both quantitative and qualitative, including case study methodology, thematic content analysis, discourse analysis, framework analysis and process tracing, which may require differing levels of familiarity and skills to apply (we highlight a few of these in the case studies below). Analysis can also be structured according to theoretical approaches. When it comes to analysing policies, process tracing can be particularly useful to combine multiple sources of information, establish a chronicle of events and reveal political and social processes, so as to create a narrative of the policy cycle ( Yin, 1994 ; Shiffman et al. , 2004 ). Practically, you will also want to take a holistic view of the documents’ ‘answers’ to the questions or analysis categories you applied during the data extraction phase. Overall, what did the documents ‘say’ about these thematic categories? What variation did you find within and between documents, and along which axes? Answers to these questions are best recorded by developing notes or memos, which again will come in handy as you write up your results.

As with all qualitative research, you will want to consider your own positionality towards the documents (and their sources and authors); it may be helpful to keep a ‘reflexivity’ memo documenting how your personal characteristics or pre-standing views might influence your analysis ( Watt, 2007 ).

Step 4. Distil your findings

You will know when you have completed your document review when one of the three things happens: (1) completeness (you feel satisfied you have obtained every document fitting your criteria—this is rare), (2) out of time (this means you should have used more specific criteria), and (3) saturation (you fully or sufficiently understand the phenomenon you are studying). In all cases, you should strive to make the third situation the reason for ending your document review, though this will not always mean you will have read and analysed every document fitting your criteria—just enough documents to feel confident you have found good answers to your research questions.

Now it is time to refine your findings. During the extraction phase, you did the equivalent of walking along the beach, noticing the beautiful shells, driftwood and sea glass, and picking them up along the way. During the analysis phase, you started sorting these items into different buckets (your analysis categories) and building increasingly detailed collections. Now you have returned home from the beach, and it is time to clean your objects, rinse them of sand and preserve only the best specimens for presentation. To do this, you can return to your memos, refine them, illustrate them with graphics and quotes and fill in any incomplete areas. It can also be illuminating to look across different strands of work: e.g. how did the content, style, authorship, or tone of arguments evolve over time? Can you illustrate which words, concepts or phrases were used by authors or author groups?

Results will often first be grouped by theoretical or analytic category, or presented as a policy narrative, interweaving strands from other methods you may have used (interviews, observation, etc.). It can also be helpful to create conceptual charts and graphs, especially as this corresponds to your analytical framework (Panels 1 and 2). If you have been keeping a timeline of events, you can seek out any missing information from other sources. Finally, ask yourself how the validity of your findings checks against what you have learned using other methods. The final products of the distillation process will vary by research study, but they will invariably allow you to state your findings relative to your research questions and to draw policy-relevant conclusions.

Document analysis is an essential component of health policy research—it is also relatively convenient and can be low cost. Using an organized system of analysis enhances the document analysis’s procedural rigour, allows for a fuller understanding of policy process and content and enhances the effectiveness of other methods such as interviews and non-participant observation. We propose the READ approach as a systematic method for interrogating documents and extracting study-relevant data that is flexible enough to accommodate many types of research questions. We hope that this article encourages discussion about how to make best use of data from documents when researching health policy questions.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data are available at Health Policy and Planning online.

Supplementary Material

Czaa064_supplementary_data, acknowledgements.

The data extraction tool in the Supplementary Materials for the iCCM case study (Panel 2) was conceived of by the research team for the multi-country study ‘Policy Analysis of Community Case Management for Childhood and Newborn Illnesses’. The authors thank Sara Bennett and Daniela Rodriguez for granting permission to publish this tool. S.M. was supported by The Olympia-Morata-Programme of Heidelberg University. The funders had no role in the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of any funder.

Conflict of interest statement . None declared.

Ethical approval. No ethical approval was required for this study.

• Abdelmutti N, Hoffman-Goetz L.  2009. Risk messages about HPV, cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccine Gardasil: a content analysis of Canadian and U.S. national newspaper articles . Women & Health   49 : 422–40. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Adebiyi BO, Mukumbang FC, Beytell A-M.  2019. To what extent is fetal alcohol spectrum disorder considered in policy-related documents in South Africa? A document review . Health Research Policy and Systems   17 : [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Atkinson PA, Coffey A.  1997. Analysing documentary realities In: Silverman D (ed). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice . London: SAGE. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bardach E, Patashnik EM.  2015. Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving . Los Angeles: SAGE. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bennett S, Dalglish SL, Juma PA, Rodríguez DC.  2015. Altogether now… understanding the role of international organizations in iCCM policy transfer . Health Policy and Planning   30 : ii26–35. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Berner-Rodoreda A, Bärnighausen T, Kennedy C  et al.  2018. From doxastic to epistemic: a typology and critique of qualitative interview styles . Qualitative Inquiry   26 : 291–305. 1077800418810724. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bowen GA.  2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method . Qualitative Research Journal   9 : 27–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bryman A.  1994. Analyzing Qualitative Data .
• Buse K, Mays N, Walt G.  2005. Making Health Policy . New York: Open University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Charmaz K.  2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis . London: SAGE. [ Google Scholar ]
• Claassen L, Smid T, Woudenberg F, Timmermans DRM.  2012. Media coverage on electromagnetic fields and health: content analysis of Dutch newspaper articles and websites . Health, Risk & Society   14 : 681–96. [ Google Scholar ]
• Creswell JW.  2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dalglish SL, Rodríguez DC, Harouna A, Surkan PJ.  2017. Knowledge and power in policy-making for child survival in Niger . Social Science & Medicine   177 : 150–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dalglish SL, Surkan PJ, Diarra A, Harouna A, Bennett S.  2015. Power and pro-poor policies: the case of iCCM in Niger . Health Policy and Planning   30 : ii84–94. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Entman RM.  1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm . Journal of Communication   43 : 51–8. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fournier G, Djermakoye IA.  1975. Village health teams in Niger (Maradi Department) In: Newell KW (ed). Health by the People . Geneva: WHO. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gurung G, Derrett S, Gauld R.  2020. The role and functions of community health councils in New Zealand’s health system: a document analysis . The New Zealand Medical Journal   133 : 70–82. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harvey L.  1990. Critical Social Research . London: Unwin Hyman. [ Google Scholar ]
• Harvey SA.  2018. Observe before you leap: why observation provides critical insights for formative research and intervention design that you’ll never get from focus groups, interviews, or KAP surveys . Global Health: Science and Practice   6 : 299–316. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Institut National de la Statistique. 2010. Rapport National sur les Progrès vers l'atteinte des Objectifs du Millénaire pour le Développement. Niamey, Niger: INS. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kamarulzaman A.  2013. Fighting the HIV epidemic in the Islamic world . Lancet   381 : 2058–60. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Katchmarchi AB, Taliaferro AR, Kipfer HJ.  2018. A document analysis of drowning prevention education resources in the United States . International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion   25 : 78–84. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Krippendorff K.  2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology . SAGE. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marten R.  2019. How states exerted power to create the Millennium Development Goals and how this shaped the global health agenda: lessons for the sustainable development goals and the future of global health . Global Public Health   14 : 584–99. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Maxwell JA.  2005. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 2 nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mayring P.  2004. Qualitative Content Analysis . In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds).   A Companion to Qualitative Research SAGE. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ministère de la Santé Publique. 2010. Enquête nationale sur la survie des enfants de 0 à 59 mois et la mortalité au Niger 2010. Niamey, Niger: MSP. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mogalakwe M.  2009. The documentary research method—using documentary sources in social research . Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review   25 : 43–58. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nelkin D.  1991. AIDS and the news media . The Milbank Quarterly   69 : 293–307. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ouedraogo O, Doudou MH, Drabo KM  et al.  2020. Policy overview of the multisectoral nutrition planning process: the progress, challenges, and lessons learned from Burkina Faso . The International Journal of Health Planning and Management   35 : 120–39. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Prior L.  2003. Using Documents in Social Research . London: SAGE. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shiffman J, Stanton C, Salazar AP.  2004. The emergence of political priority for safe motherhood in Honduras . Health Policy and Planning   19 : 380–90. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Smith KC, Washington C, Welding K  et al.  2017. Cigarette stick as valuable communicative real estate: a content analysis of cigarettes from 14 low-income and middle-income countries . Tobacco Control   26 : 604–7. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Strömbäck J, Dimitrova DV.  2011. Mediatization and media interventionism: a comparative analysis of Sweden and the United States . The International Journal of Press/Politics   16 : 30–49. [ Google Scholar ]
• UNICEF. 2010. Maternal, Newborn & Child Surival Profile. Niamey, Niger: UNICEF . [ Google Scholar ]
• Watt D.  2007. On becoming a qualitative researcher: the value of reflexivity . Qualitative Report   12 : 82–101. [ Google Scholar ]
• Weber M.  2015. Bureaucracy In: Waters T, Waters D (eds). Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification . London: Palgrave MacMillan. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wesley JJ.  2010. Qualitative Document Analysis in Political Science.
• World Health Organization. 2006. Country Health System Fact Sheet 2006: Niger. Niamey, Niger: WHO.
• Yin R.  1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [ Google Scholar ]

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, document analysis as a qualitative research method.

Qualitative Research Journal

ISSN : 1443-9883

Article publication date: 3 August 2009

This article examines the function of documents as a data source in qualitative research and discusses document analysis procedure in the context of actual research experiences. Targeted to research novices, the article takes a nuts‐and‐bolts approach to document analysis. It describes the nature and forms of documents, outlines the advantages and limitations of document analysis, and offers specific examples of the use of documents in the research process. The application of document analysis to a grounded theory study is illustrated.

• Content analysis
• Grounded theory
• Thematic analysis
• Triangulation

Bowen, G.A. (2009), "Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method", Qualitative Research Journal , Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles

All feedback is valuable.

Please share your general feedback

Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questions

Contact Customer Support

No products in the cart.

The Basics of Document Analysis

Document analysis is the process of reviewing or evaluating documents both printed and electronic in a methodical manner. The document analysis method, like many other qualitative research methods, involves examining and interpreting data to uncover meaning, gain understanding, and come to a conclusion.

What is Meant by Document Analysis?

Document analysis pertains to the process of interpreting documents for an assessment topic by the researcher as a means of giving voice and meaning. In Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method by Glenn A. Bowen , document analysis is described as, “... a systematic procedure for reviewing or evaluating documents—both printed and electronic (computer-based and Internet-transmitted) material. Like other analytical methods in qualitative research, document analysis requires that data be examined and interpreted in order to elicit meaning, gain understanding, and develop empirical knowledge.”

During the analysis of documents, the content is categorized into distinct themes, similar to the way transcripts from interviews or focus groups are analyzed. The documents may also be graded or scored using a rubric.

Document analysis is a social research method of great value, and it plays a crucial role in most triangulation methods, combining various methods to study a particular phenomenon.

>> View Webinar: How-To’s for Data Analysis

Documents fall into three main categories:

• Personal Documents: A personal account of an individual's beliefs, actions, and experiences. The following are examples: e-mails, calendars, scrapbooks, Facebook posts, incident reports, blogs, duty logs, newspapers, and reflections or journals.
• Public Records: Records of an organization's activities that are maintained continuously over time. These include mission statements, student transcripts, annual reports, student handbooks, policy manuals, syllabus, and strategic plans.
• Physical Evidence: Artifacts or items found within a study setting, also referred to as artifacts. Among these are posters, flyers, agendas, training materials, and handbooks.

The qualitative researcher generally makes use of two or more resources, each using a different data source and methodology, to achieve convergence and corroboration. An important purpose of triangulating evidence is to establish credibility through a convergence of evidence. Corroboration of findings across data sets reduces the possibility of bias, by examining data gathered in different ways.

It is important to note that document analysis differs from content analysis as content analysis refers to more than documents. As part of their definition for content analysis, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health states that, “Sources of data could be from interviews, open-ended questions, field research notes, conversations, or literally any occurrence of communicative language (such as books, essays, discussions, newspaper headlines, speeches, media, historical documents).

How Do You Do Document Analysis?

In order for a researcher to obtain reliable results from document analysis, a detailed planning process must be undertaken. The following is an outline of an eight-step planning process that should be employed in all textual analysis including document analysis techniques.

• Identify the texts you want to analyze such as samples, population, participants, and respondents.
• You should consider how texts will be accessed, paying attention to any cultural or linguistic barriers.
• Acknowledge and resolve biases.
• Acquire appropriate research skills.
• Strategize for ensuring credibility.
• Identify the data that is being sought.
• Take into account ethical issues.
• Keep a backup plan handy.

Researchers can use a wide variety of texts as part of their research, but the most common source is likely to be written material. Researchers often ask how many documents they should collect. There is an opinion that a wide selection of documents is preferable, but the issue should probably revolve more around the quality of the document than its quantity.

Why is Document Analysis Useful?

Different types of documents serve different purposes. They provide background information, indicate potential interview questions, serve as a mechanism for monitoring progress and tracking changes within a project, and allow for verification of any claims or progress made.

You can triangulate your claims about the phenomenon being studied using document analysis by using multiple sources and other research gathering methods.

Below are the advantages and disadvantages of document analysis

• Document analysis may assist researchers in determining what questions to ask your interviewees, as well as provide insight into what to watch out for during your participant observation.
• It is particularly useful to researchers who wish to focus on specific case studies
• It is inexpensive and quick in cases where data is easily obtainable.
• Documents provide specific and reliable data, unaffected by researchers' presence unlike with other research methods like participant observation.

Disadvantages

• It is likely that the documents researchers obtain are not complete or written objectively, requiring researchers to adopt a critical approach and not assume their contents are reliable or unbiased.
• There may be a risk of information overload due to the number of documents involved. Researchers often have difficulties determining what parts of each document are relevant to the topic being studied.
• It may be necessary to anonymize documents and compare them with other documents.

How NVivo Can Help with Document Analysis

Analyzing copious amounts of data and information can be a daunting and time-consuming prospect. Luckily, qualitative data analysis tools like NVivo can help!

NVivo’s AI-powered autocoding text analysis tool can help you efficiently analyze data and perform thematic analysis . By automatically detecting, grouping, and tagging noun phrases, you can quickly identify key themes throughout your documents – aiding in your evaluation.

Additionally, once you start coding part of your data, NVivo’s smart coding can take care of the rest for you by using machine learning to match your coding style. After your initial coding, you can run queries and create visualizations to expand on initial findings and gain deeper insights.

These features allow you to conduct data analysis on large amounts of documents – improving the efficiency of this qualitative research method. Learn more about these features in the webinar, NVivo 14: Thematic Analysis Using NVivo.

>> Watch Webinar NVivo 14: Thematic Analysis Using NVivo

Learn More About Document Analysis

Watch Twenty-Five Qualitative Researchers Share How-To's for Data Analysis

Recent Articles

• DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
• Corpus ID: 144027912

Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method

• Glenn A. Bowen
• Published 3 August 2009
• Sociology, Education
• Qualitative Research Journal

Tables from this paper

6,729 Citations

A content analysis of content analyses in is research: purposes, data sources, and methodological characteristics.

• Highly Influenced

Application of Rigour and Credibility in Qualitative Document Analysis: Lessons Learnt from a Case Study

• 11 Excerpts

Contextualizing Scientific Research Methodologies

Policy document analysis: a practical educational leadership tool and a qualitative research method, a conceptual framework for qualitative research: a literature studies, conducting a qualitative document analysis, qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects, texts as data i: document analysis, a review of research methodologies and methods used in recent partnership studies, critical method of document analysis, 35 references, case study research in education : a qualitative approach, qualitative evaluation and research methods, the creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method, demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development, the art of case study research, basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, the use of grounded theory for the qualitative analysis of organizational behaviour, naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note, constraints, compromises and choice: comparing three qualitative research studies, a diary study of information needs and document usage in the engineering domain, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

Research Methodology in Education

• Get Edit Link
• The Writing Space
• Welcome Desk

March 9, 2016

• An Introduction to Document Analysis

Introduction

Document analysis is a form of qualitative research in which documents are interpreted by the researcher to give voice and meaning around an assessment topic (Bowen, 2009). Analyzing documents incorporates coding content into themes similar to how focus group or interview transcripts are analyzed (Bowen,2009). A rubric can also be used to grade or score document. There are three primary types of documents (O’Leary, 2014):

• Public Records: The official, ongoing records of an organization’s activities. Examples include student transcripts, mission statements, annual reports, policy manuals, student handbooks, strategic plans, and syllabi.
• Personal Documents: First-person accounts of an individual’s actions, experiences, and beliefs. Examples include calendars, e-mails, scrapbooks, blogs, Facebook posts, duty logs, incident reports, reflections/journals, and newspapers.
• Physical Evidence: Physical objects found within the study setting (often called artifacts). Examples include flyers, posters, agendas, handbooks, and training materials.

Document analysis is a social research method and is an important research tool in its own right, and is an invaluable part of most schemes of triangulation, the combination of methodologies in the study of the same phenomenon (Bowen, 2009). In order to seek convergence and corroboration, qualitative researchers usually use at least two resources through using different data sources and methods. The purpose of triangulating is to provide a confluence of evidence that breeds credibility (Bowen, 2009). Corroborating findings across data sets can reduce the impact of potential bias by examining information collected through different methods. Also, combining qualitative and quantitative sometimes included in document analysis called mixed-methods studies.  

Before actual document analysis takes place, the researcher must go through a detailed planning process in order to ensure reliable results. O’Leary outlines an 8-step planning process that should take place not just in document analysis, but all textual analysis (2014):

• Create a list of texts to explore (e.g., population, samples, respondents, participants).
• Consider how texts will be accessed with attention to linguistic or cultural barriers.
• Acknowledge and address biases.
• Develop appropriate skills for research.
• Consider strategies for ensuring credibility.
• Know the data one is searching for.
• Consider ethical issues (e.g., confidential documents).
• Have a backup plan.

A researcher can use a huge plethora of texts for research, although by far the most common is likely to be the use of written documents (O’Leary, 2014). There is the question of how many documents the researcher should gather. Bowen suggests that a wide array of documents is better, although the question should be more about quality of the document rather than quantity (Bowen, 2009). O’Leary also introduces two major issues to consider when beginning document analysis. The first is the issue of bias, both in the author or creator of the document, and the researcher as well (2014). The researcher must consider the subjectivity of the author and also the personal biases he or she may be bringing to the research. Bowen adds that the researcher must evaluate the original purpose of the document, such as the target audience (2009). He or she should also consider whether the author was a firsthand witness or used secondhand sources. Also important is determining whether the document was solicited, edited, and/or anonymous (Bowen, 2009). O’Leary’s second major issue is the “unwitting” evidence, or latent content, of the document. Latent content refers to the style, tone, agenda, facts or opinions that exist in the document. This is a key first step that the researcher must keep in mind (O’Leary, 2014). Bowen adds that documents should be assessed for their completeness; in other words, how selective or comprehensive their data is (2009). Also of paramount importance when evaluating documents is not to consider the data as “necessarily precise, accurate, or complete recordings of events that have occurred” (Bowen, 2009, p. 33). These issues are summed up in another eight-step process offered by O’Leary (2014):

• Gather relevant texts.
• Develop an organization and management scheme.
• Make copies of the originals for annotation.
• Asses authenticity of documents.
• Explore document’s agenda, biases.
• Explore background information (e.g., tone, style, purpose).
• Ask questions about document (e.g., Who produced it? Why? When? Type of data?).
• Explore content.

Step eight refers to the process of exploring the “witting” evidence, or the actual content of the documents, and O’Leary gives two major techniques for accomplishing this (2014). One is the interview technique. In this case, the researcher treats the document like a respondent or informant that provides the researcher with relevant information (O’Leary, 2014). The researcher “asks” questions then highlights the answer within the text. The other technique is noting occurrences, or content analysis, where the researcher quantifies the use of particular words, phrases and concepts (O’Leary, 2014). Essentially, the researcher determines what is being searched for, then documents and organizes the frequency and amount of occurrences within the document. The information is then organized into what is “related to central questions of the research” (Bowen, 2009, p. 32). Bowen notes that some experts object to this kind of analysis, saying that it obscures the interpretive process in the case of interview transcriptions (Bowen, 2009). However, Bowen reminds us that documents include a wide variety of types, and content analysis can be very useful for painting a broad, overall picture (2009). According to Bowen (2009), content analysis, then, is used as a “first-pass document review” (p. 32) that can provide the researcher a means of identifying meaningful and relevant passages.

In addition to content analysis, Bowen also notes thematic analysis, which can be considered a form of pattern recognition with the document’s data (2009). This analysis takes emerging themes and makes them into categories used for further analysis, making it a useful practice for grounded theory. It includes careful, focused reading and re-reading of data, as well as coding and category construction (Bowen, 2009). The emerging codes and themes may also serve to “integrate data gathered by different methods” (Bowen, 2009, p. 32). Bowen sums up the overall concept of document analysis as a process of “evaluating documents in such a way that empirical knowledge is produced and understanding is developed” (2009, p. 33). It is not just a process of lining up a collection of excerpts that convey whatever the researcher desires. The researcher must maintain a high level of objectivity and sensitivity in order for the document analysis results to be credible and valid (Bowen, 2009).

The Advantages of Document Analysis

There are many reasons why researchers choose to use document analysis. Firstly, document analysis is an efficient and effective way of gathering data because documents are manageable and practical resources. Documents are commonplace and come in a variety of forms, making documents a very accessible and reliable source of data. Obtaining and analysing documents is often far more cost efficient and time efficient than conducting your own research or experiments (Bowen, 2009). Also, documents are stable, “non-reactive” data sources, meaning that they can be read and reviewed multiple times and remain unchanged by the researcher’s influence or research process (Bowen, 2009, p. 31).

Document analysis is often used because of the many different ways it can support and strengthen research. Document analysis can be used in many different fields of research, as either a primary method of data collection or as a compliment to other methods. Documents can provide supplementary research data, making document analysis a useful and beneficial method for most research. Documents can provide background information and broad coverage of data, and are therefore helpful in contextualizing one’s research within its subject or field (Bowen, 2009). Documents can also contain data that no longer can be observed, provide details that informants have forgotten, and can track change and development. Document analysis can also point to questions that need to be asked or to situations that need to be observed, making the use of document analysis a way to ensure your research is critical and comprehensive (Bowen, 2009).

Concerns to Keep in Mind When Using Document Analysis

The disadvantages of using document analysis are not so much limitations as they are potential concerns to be aware of before choosing the method or when using it. An initial concern to consider is that documents are not created with data research agendas and therefore require some investigative skills. A document will not perfectly provide all of the necessary information required to answer your research questions. Some documents may only provide a small amount of useful data or sometimes none at all. Other documents may be incomplete, or their data may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Sometimes there are gaps or sparseness of documents, leading to more searching or reliance on additional documents then planned (Bowen, 2009). Also, some documents may not be available or easily accessible. For these reasons, it is important to evaluate the quality of your documents and to be prepared to encounter some challenges or gaps when employing document analysis.

Another concern to be aware of before beginning document analysis, and to keep in mind during, is the potential presence of biases, both in a document and from the researcher. Both Bowen and O’Leary state that it is important to thoroughly evaluate and investigate the subjectivity of documents and your understanding of their data in order to preserve the credibility of your research (2009; 2014).

The reason that the issues surrounding document analysis are concerns and not disadvantages is that they can be easily avoided by having a clear process that incorporates evaluative steps and measures, as previously mentioned above and exemplified by O’Leary’s two eight-step processes. As long as a researcher begins document analysis knowing what the method entails and has a clear process planned, the advantages of document analysis are likely to far outweigh the amount of issues that may arise.

References:

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027 O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

And So It Was Written

Author: Triad 3

Published: March 9, 2016

Word Count: 1626

ORGANIZED BY

More to read, add yours →.

I found the document so interesting. Thank you

Dear Triad Your article was very insightful. I am currently researching about document analysis to make it my methodology strategy to analyze a web application. I would be glad if you had any more material regarding this subject to share.

Very helpful.

Thank you for this valuable information. I request for more such information in qualitative analysis.

I benefited from this article so much . thank you for taking your time to write and share it.

This is really helpful for understanding the basic concept of document analysis. Really impressive!

This is one of the good way to remove difficulties during writing the research

Hi, valuable information herein. My research is qualitative and I want to take a number of pictures which I will then use to formulate questions for the interview guide. My question is this, how do I formulate the document analysis checklist?

Regards, Nancy

Comments are closed.

Recently Written

• Observation: Not As Simple As You Thought (ADK)
• RESEARCH TOOLS: INTERVIEWS & QUESTIONNAIRES
• Grounded Theory: A Down-to-Earth Explanation
• Assignment (10)

View by Date Published

Search writings.

A TRU Writer powered SPLOT : Research Methodology in Education

Blame @cogdog — Up ↑

Extract insights from Customer & Employee Interviews. At Scale.

Document analysis as a qualitative research method explained.

Home » Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method Explained

Document analysis is a vital qualitative research method that allows researchers to explore, interpret, and evaluate documents as rich sources of information. This approach broadens the understanding of social phenomena through the analysis of textual materials, such as interviews, reports, or personal diaries. By examining these documents, researchers can uncover hidden themes, patterns, and insights that may not be easily visible through other means.

Understanding the document analysis method is crucial for those in research-focused domains. It not only enhances the depth of inquiry but also allows for a comprehensive understanding of the context surrounding the material. Through careful examination, researchers can draw connections and derive conclusions that contribute to the broader body of knowledge in their field. This introductory section serves to lay the groundwork for a deeper exploration of document analysis as a methodology.

What is Document Analysis Method?

Document Analysis Method is a qualitative research approach focused on interpreting and understanding various forms of documents. This method allows researchers to extract meaningful insights from texts, such as reports, articles, letters, and even digital media. By examining the content, context, and structure of these documents, researchers can uncover patterns or themes that contribute to a deeper understanding of the subject or issue being studied.

A key benefit of the Document Analysis Method is its ability to provide rich, contextual information. The method often involves several critical steps: identifying relevant documents, thoroughly reading the material, coding themes or categories, and synthesizing findings. Each step enhances the researcher’s comprehension and offers a structured way to present insights. This technique is especially valuable in exploring historical events, social phenomena, or organizational practices, providing a comprehensive view that helps inform decisions and further research.

Definition and Scope

Document analysis is a qualitative research method used to systematically evaluate and interpret various documents. This method encompasses both written and visual materials, providing valuable insights into social, cultural, and organizational contexts. It allows researchers to examine texts, images, and other artifacts to uncover underlying themes and patterns. By employing this approach, researchers can gather a deeper understanding of their subject matter without the need for direct engagement with participants.

The scope of document analysis is broad and can include a variety of document types, such as reports, letters, photographs, and social media content. Researchers can apply this method across numerous fields, including education, history, and business studies. Document analysis not only helps in answering specific research questions but also contributes to the generation of new theories by synthesizing existing information. This versatility makes document analysis an essential component of qualitative research that aids in contextualizing and interpreting complex issues.

Importance in Qualitative Research

Qualitative research is crucial for understanding the nuanced experiences and perspectives of participants. The Document Analysis Method plays an essential role in this type of research by allowing researchers to delve into written materials, uncovering themes, and generating rich insights from existing texts. This method enables researchers to analyze documents such as reports, letters, or even social media posts, offering a comprehensive view of the subject matter at hand.

One of the key benefits of document analysis is its capacity to reveal patterns and trends from multiple sources. This method also facilitates the exploration of contextual factors that influence the content, thereby enriching the understanding of the subject. Moreover, as researchers examine documents, they can ask specific questions that guide their analysis, allowing them to clarify points and seek deeper meanings. Overall, the Document Analysis Method is vital for generating qualitative insights that inform decisions, policy-making, and further research.

Conducting Document Analysis Method Effectively

To conduct the Document Analysis Method effectively, it's crucial to approach it systematically. Start by clearly defining the objectives of your analysis. This will guide the selection of documents and help clarify what insights you aim to uncover. Next, diligently gather diverse documents relevant to your research question, ensuring a comprehensive perspective on the subject matter.

Once you have the appropriate documents, employ a structured coding system to categorize the information. This helps maintain consistency and reduces subjectivity. While analyzing, be vigilant for biases that might skew interpretations. Combining qualitative data with insights from different sources can enhance the depth of your findings. This approach not only enriches your understanding but also fosters transparency in your analysis. By following these fundamental strategies, you can effectively implement the Document Analysis Method and uncover valuable insights from your qualitative research.

Steps in the Document Analysis Process

The Document Analysis Method encompasses several key steps that guide researchers through the process systematically. Initially, it begins with selecting relevant documents that align with the research objectives. This involves identifying sources, such as interviews, reports, or articles, that provide rich qualitative data for analysis. Next, researchers organize the selected materials to ensure easy access and reference during the analysis.

Following this, the analysis phase entails carefully reviewing and annotating the documents. This is where important themes, patterns, and categories are identified. As researchers dig deeper, they synthesize findings and draw connections between various pieces of data. Finally, the last step is to interpret the results, which involves contextualizing findings within the broader research framework and drawing meaningful conclusions. This holistic approach helps to enrich understanding and supports the overall research goals effectively.

Best Practices and Common Pitfalls

When utilizing the Document Analysis Method, it is essential to follow best practices to ensure the quality and credibility of your research findings. A well-defined objective guides the analysis process, allowing you to extract relevant insights effectively. Always maintain a systematic approach when organizing documents, as this will help you identify patterns and trends seamlessly. Regularly triangulate your findings with other data sources to enhance the robustness of your conclusions.

However, certain pitfalls can compromise the integrity of your analysis. Firstly, failing to account for biases may lead to skewed interpretations of the data. Secondly, overlooking the context in which documents were created can result in misinterpretations of the content. Lastly, inadequate documentation of your analysis process can hinder reproducibility and undermine your credibility. By being mindful of these practices and pitfalls, researchers can make the most out of the Document Analysis Method and foster trustworthy findings.

Conclusion: The Value of the Document Analysis Method in Research

Document analysis serves as a powerful tool in qualitative research, offering a systematic approach to understanding textual data. This method allows researchers to extract meaningful insights from various documents, enhancing our understanding of context and perspectives. By examining written material, the Document Analysis Method enables the identification of patterns, themes, and trends that might not be apparent through other research methods.

The value of this approach lies in its ability to provide depth and clarity to complex information. It encourages critical thinking and allows researchers to reflect on the significance of the content. Moreover, with the right tools, the efficiency of document analysis can be significantly improved, helping teams avoid bias and streamline data interpretation. Ultimately, this method not only enriches research outcomes but also fosters a deeper appreciation for the nuances embedded within written materials.

Turn interviews into actionable insights

On this Page

Purpose of Grounded Theory Research in Market Insights

You may also like, ai ml use cases for business innovation.

Top Companies Using AI in 2024

Ai computer program solutions for businesses.

Unlock Insights from Interviews 10x faster

• Request demo
• Get started for free

Monday, January 20, 2020

A QDA recipe? A ten-step approach for qualitative document analysis using MAXQDA

Guest post by Professional MAXQDA Trainer Dr. Daniel Rasch .

Introduction

Qualitative text or document analysis has evolved into one of the most used qualitative methods across several disciplines ( Kuckartz, 2014 & Mayring, 2010). Its straightforward structure and procedure enable the researcher to adapt the method to his or her special case – nearly to every need.

This article proposes a recipe of ten simple steps for conducting qualitative document analyses (QDA) using MAXQDA (see table 1 for an overview).

Table 1: Overview of the “QDA recipe”

The ten steps for conducting qualitative document analyses using MAXQDA

Step 1: the research question(s).

As always, research begins with the question(s). Three aspects should be covered when dealing with the research question(s):

• What do you want to find out exactly,
• what relevance does your research on this exact question have, and
• what contribution is your research going to make to your discipline?

Highlight these questions in your introduction and make your research stand out.

Step 2: Data collection and data sampling

After you have decided on the questions, you should think about how to answer them. What kind of qualitative data will best answer your question? Interviews – how many and with whom? Documents – which ones and where to collect them from?

At this point, you can already start thinking about validity: are you going to use a representative or a biased sample? Check the different options for sampling and its effects on validity ( Krippendorff, 2019 ).

Step 3: Select and prepare the data

For this step, MAXQDA 2020 is an excellent tool to help you prepare the selected data for any further steps . Whatever type of qualitative data you choose, you can import it into MAXQDA and then you can have MAXQDA assist in transcribing it. In the end, qualitative document analysis is all about written forms of communication (Kuckartz, 2014).

Figure 1: Import the data you have chosen or selected

Step 4: Codebook development

It takes time to develop a solid codebook. Working deductively, the process is a little easier with codes deriving from the theoretical considerations in the context of your research. Inductively, there are various steps you can use, ranging from creative coding to in-vivo-codes.

Content-wise, you can apply all sorts of codes, such as themes or evaluations, two of the most commonly used styles of content analysis (see thematic and evaluative content analysis in Kuckartz, 2014).

Figure 2: coding options in MAXQDA

• a brief definition,
• a long definition,
• criteria for when to use the code, 
• criteria for when not to use the code, and
• an example.

Using MAXQDA’s code memos simplify the process of creating and maintaining a good codebook . First, you can always go back to the codes and view and review your codebook within your project, and second, you can simply export the codebook as an attachment or appendix for publication purposes (use: Reports > Codebook ).

Figure 3: Creating a new code with code memo

Step 5: Unitizing and coding instructions

Before the process of coding starts, it is necessary to decide on the units of, as well as the rules for, coding. It is especially important to decide on your unit of coding (sentences, paragraphs, quasi-sentences, etc.). Coding rules help to keep this choice consistent and support you to stick to your research question(s) because every passage you code and every memo you write should be done in order to answer your research question(s). Decision rules should be added: what are you going to do if a passage does not fit in your subcodes but should be coded because it is important for your research question?

Step 6: Trial, training, reliability

Trial runs are of major importance. Not only do they show you, which codes work and which do not, but they also help you to rethink your choices in terms of the unit of coding, the content of the codebook, and reliability. Since there are different options for the latter, stick to what works best for you: either a qualitative comparison of what you have coded or quantitative indicators like Krippendorff’s alpha if need be .

You can test yourself or a team you work with and there might even be some situations, where a reliability test is not helpful or needed. When testing the codebook, be sure to test the variability of your collected documents and be sure that the entire codebook is tested. 

MAXQDA helps you compare different forms of agreement for more an unlimited number of texts, divided into two different document groups (one document group coded by coder 1, a second document group coded by coder 2 – be aware, that you can also test yourself and be coder 2 yourself).

Figure 4: Intercoder agreement

Step 7: Revision and modification

After checking, which codes work and which do not, you can revise the codebook and modify it. As Schreier puts it: “No coding frame (codebook – DR) is perfect” (Schreier, 2012: 147).

Step 8: Coding

There are many different coding strategies, but one thing is for sure: qualitative work needs time and reading, as well as working with the material over and over again.

One coding strategy might be to first make yourself comfortable with the documents and start coding after second or third reading only. Another strategy is to concentrate on some of your codes first and do a second round of coding with the other codes later.

Step 9: Analyze and compare

Analyze and compare – these two words are the essence of the qualitative analysis at this step. At the core of each qualitative document analysis is the description of the content and the comparison of these contents between the documents you analyze.

After everything has been coded, you can make use of different analysis strategies: paraphrase, write summaries, look for intersections of codes, patterns of likeliness between the documents using simple or complex queries.

Figure 5: different analysis strategies in MAXQDA

Step 10: Interpretation and presentation

Reporting and summarizing qualitative findings is difficult. Most often, we find simple descriptions of the content with the use of quotations, paraphrases or other references to the text. However, MAXQDA makes it fast and easier with many options to choose from . The easiest way is to generate a table to sum up your findings – if your data or the findings allow for this.

MAXQDA offers several options: either map relations of codes, documents or memos with the MAXMaps , create matrices between codes and documents ( Code Matrix Browser ) or codes and codes ( Code Relations Browser ) to display the distribution of codes inside your data or even using different colors to map the distribution of codes or single documents.

Figure 6: Visual Tools for presentation

The Code Matrix Browser also enables you to quantify the qualitative data using two clicks. You can export these numbers for further analysis with statistical packages, to run causal relation and effect calculations, such as regressions or correlations ( Rasch, 2018 ).

Summary and adoption

Qualitative document analysis is one of the most popular techniques and adaptable to nearly every field. MAXQDA is a software tool that offers many options to make your analysis and therefore your research easier .

The recipe works best for theory-driven, deductive coding. However, it can be also used for inductive, explorative work by switching some of these steps around: for example, your codebook development might be one step to do during or after the trial and testing, since codes are developed inductively during the coding process. Still, it is important to define these codes properly.

The above-mentioned recipe has been used as a basis for several publications by the author. Starting with simple comparison of qualitative and quantitative text analysis ( Boräng et al., 2014 ), to the usage of the qualitative data as a basis for regression models ( Eising et al., 2015 ; Eising et al., 2017 ) to a book using mixed methods and therefore both qualitative and quantitative data analysis ( Rasch, 2018 ).

About the author

Daniel Rasch is a post-doctoral researcher in political science at the German University of Administrative Sciences, Speyer. He received his Ph.D. with a mixed methods analysis of lobbyists‘ success in the European Union. He focuses on the quantification of qualitative data. He is an experienced MAXQDA lecturer and has been a Professional MAXQDA Trainer since 2012.

MAXQDA Newsletter

Our research and analysis tips, straight to your inbox.

Similar Articles

• #ResearchforChange Grants (46)
• Conferences & Events (32)
• Field Work Diary (39)
• Learning MAXQDA (110)
• Research Projects (132)
• Tip of the Month (57)
• Uncategorized (11)
• Updates (66)
• VERBI News (71)

The Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit

Document analysis.

A useful tool for data checking, often combined with analysis of project records and interviewing, is document analysis.

This technique can also be used in theory-based evaluations. By analysing key documentation and reports relating to your project and the problem it is tackling, you can get a better understanding of the context and the factors that are causing the problem. You can also triangulate your findings and check your assumptions by asking whether they are borne out in the documentation.

Illustration

So, your survey of a local village has shown that men have attended family planning courses along with their wives and that they are now regularly using contraceptives. Yet your analysis of local reports (e.g. hospital records) show that there is an increase in unplanned births, teenage pregnancies and the spread of infectious diseases. The documentation appears to contradict your survey and you may need to ask some discreet questions of villagers in order to get to the bottom of this.

What counts as document analysis?

The points raised below draw heavily on the work of Glenn A. Bowen (‘Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method’)

Document analysis is a systematic procedure for reviewing or evaluating documents—both printed and electronic (computer-based and Internet-transmitted) material

Documents that may be used for systematic evaluation as part of a study take a variety of forms including:

advertisements; agendas, attendance registers, and minutes of meetings; manuals; background papers; books and brochures; diaries and journals; event programs (i.e.,printed outlines); internal correspondence; letters and memoranda; maps and charts; newspapers (clippings/ articles); press releases; program proposals, application forms, and summaries; radio and television program scripts; organisational or institutional reports; survey data; and various public records. 

Scrapbooks and photo albums can also furnish documentary material for research purposes. These types of documents are found in libraries, newspaper archives, historical society offices, and organisational or institutional files.

Why use this technique?

Document analysis helps you to triangulate the claims about your project because it allows you to refer to multiple sources and to combine this document review with, for example, interviews.

So, documentary evidence drawn from school brochures and school websites in Namibia may tell you that the overriding priroty of schools in Winhoek is on pupil safety.

Yet police records may reveal that there is a high incidence of rape of young school girls, including by secondary school teachers. Interviews may be required to tease out why the documentary evidence is contradictory.

Documents serve various purposes. They provide context and historical background, point to possible interview questions, offer a means of tracking developments and monitoring progress over the course of a project, and provide a means of verifying (or questioning) that progress or indeed other claims.

Advantages & Disadvantages

• Document analysis helps you focus on the questions you might ask in interviews and also helps you understand what to look out for with participant observation.
• It is particularly useful when you want to drill down and focus on a particular case study, be it a particular patient, school pupil, village, sub-sector or workshop.
• It is relatively cost-effective and rapid where data is readily available (e.g. via the internet).
• Documents offer specific and stable data, which is unaffected by the presence of researchers (with participant observation by contrast, project participants may behave differently when they know they are being observed).

Disadvantages

• Documents may not be complete or written in an objective fashion so you will have to adopt a critical stance and not assume that the information contained within them is precise or unbiased.
• The number of documents involved can lead to information overload. Which parts of which document are most relevant to your question? Which is largely about the progress of your project and the factors that have helped or hindered that progress?
• Documents may need to be anonymised and scrutinised against other documents. Is the one document that you end up using most representative or is it stating something very different to all the other documents? If so, why is this? Is the source or research design or the purpose of the document different?
• Note that artifact analysis can be an alternative or complement to document analysis. It involves interpreting different artifacts such as tools, sculptures, weapons or even pieces of equipment. For ways of analysing such artifacts, see for example the National Archives website .

Where to next?

Click here to return to the top of the page and here to return to Step 3 (Data Checking).

• Ask Dr Cath
• How to work in public health
• Tips for getting public health jobs
• How to become a Public Health Consultant
• Being a Consultant in Public Health
• Securing the consultant interview
• Public Health Registrars
• Public Health Estate Agent
• FPH Diplomate Exam
• FPH Membership Exam
• GP Trainees
• Public Health
• Child Public Health
• Health Protection
• Health Promotion
• Medical Sociology
• Population Health
• Social Medicine
• Instaskills
• Caldicott Guardian
• Commissioning Public Health Services
• Effective Manager
• Effective Leader
• Implementing Best Practice
• Infographics
• Outbreak management
• Press Releases
• Time Management
• Strategic Planning and Management
• Understanding Statistics
• More Statistical Understanding
• Action Research
• Case Control
• Delphi Methods
• Descriptive Studies

Document Analysis

• Economic Appraisal
• Focus Groups
• Health Acorn
• Health Equity Audit
• Health Impact Assessment
• Health Needs Asessment
• Health Status Assessment
• Intervention Studies
• Observational Studies
• Official statistics
• Quality of Life
• Respondent Driven Sampling
• Social Marketing Research
• Systematic Reviews
• Secondary Statisitical Analysis
• In Dr Cath's Shoes

What is document analysis?

Document or Documentary analysis is a social research method and is an important research tool in its own right and is an invaluable part of most schemes of triangulation. It refers to the various procedures involved in analyzing and interpreting data generated from the examination of documents and records relevant to a particular study. In other words, documentary work involves reading lots of written material (it helps to scan the documents onto a computer and use a qualitative analysis package). A document is something that we can read and which relates to some aspect of the social world. Official documents are intended to be read as objective statements of fact but they are themselves socially produced.

How does document analysis work in public health?

Use of documentary analysis has become quite popular within public health research, especially if you are trying to evaluate the impact of an initiative, for example a committee led venture to increase immunisation uptake in an area or a board led approach to reduce sexual ill-health or increase physical activity during a major event like the Olympics or Rugby World Cup. In this situation, you could take a 'qualitative' approach, utilising what is known as a 'realist viewpoint'. This involves establishing ‘a priori’ set of criteria to investigate whilst enabling the analysis to be guided by the data that emerges from familiarisation with the borough plans’ material. Data would be extracted relating to pre-agreed named terms covering the scope and scale of action plans, perhaps evidence of governance arrangements and minutes of the groups used to deliver the plans. To quantify the process, number and frequency of meetings and email exchanges may be included. This approach may then be supported with follow up interviews or surveys of the parties involved in delivering the plans.

Sources of Documents:

• Public records
• Private papers
• Visual documents
• Minutes of meetings (plus emails etc which indicate the frequency of those meetings - that can help to quantify the process - and governance arrangements)
• Strategies, policies, action plans by public bodies or organisations

The term 'biography' has two meanings in social research. Firstly, it is a particular style of interviewing, where the informant is encouraged to describe how his or her life (or some aspect of it) has changed and developed over time. In doing so, they reflect his/her own conception of self, identity and personal history. Secondly, 'biography' refers to a work that draws on whatever materials are available to an author to represent an account of a person's life and achievements. Narrative analysis is used to elicit results. This is a form of analysis used for chronologically told stories. It focuses on how elements are sequenced, why some elements are evaluated differently from others and how the past shapes perceptions of the present and how the present shapes perceptions of the past and of course, how both shape perceptions of the future. It is especially used in feminist research.

Types of Analysis

Quantitative:, content analysis, qualitative:.

• Discourse analysis
• Interpretative analysis
• Conversation analysis

Grounded Theory

Content analysis is like a social survey but uses a sample of images rather than people.  It is a technique for gathering and analyzing content of text.  Generally speaking, it consists of the following steps:

• Choose a question which can be measured with variables.
• Devise your unit of analysis (amount of text that's assigned a code - e.g. each daily newspaper could be a unit) and design your code book. 
• Make a sampling frame, choosing the cases to analyse that are representative and unbiased. To get a sampling frame, search for relevant cases in contemporary or historical archives. The sample has to be representative, yet small enough for analyzing in depth. You define your population (which can be words, paragraphs, sentences or all articles in a certain period of time) and sampling element.  Very often you are counting words - e.g. how many times does the word 'hooligan' appear in articles sensationalizing the reporting of disturbances at football matches?  
• Code all the cases and analyze the resulting data.
• Produce semi-quantitative results using cross-tabulations, charts or graphs and where there are few cases, use tables.
• Report in a standard 'scientific' format.

This coding is sometimes known as 'manifest coding' and measures 4 characteristics:

• Frequency  - e.g. how many times is the subject, phrase or word mentioned?
• Direction - i.e. the direction of messages in the content along some continuum - e.g. positive, negative.
• Intensity - i.e. strength or poser of a message in a direction.
• Space - i.e. size of space on a newspaper page, time on television, placement in social media

Content analysis is formal and systematic. It lends structure to your research. Variables are categorised in a precise manner so you can count them and intercoder reliability is commonly reported with the results of content analysis studies. However, content analysis ignores context and multiple meanings.  

Semiotics is a science that studies the life of signs in society. It is the opposite to the postivist method of content analysis. It is used a lot in media analysis.

In semiotics, the analyst seeks to connect the signifier (an expression which can be words, a picture or sound) with what is signified (another word, description or image). The use of language is noted as it is considered to be a description of actions. As part of language, certain signs match up with certain meanings. Semiotics seeks to understand the underlining messages in visual texts. It is related to discourse analysis and forms the basis for interpretive analysis.

Discourse Analysis

This is concerned with the production of meaning through talk and texts. Language is viewed as the topic of the research and how people use language to construct their accounts of the social world is important.

Intrepretative Analysis

This aims to capture hidden meaning and ambiguity. It looks how messages are encoded, latent or hidden. You are also acutely aware of who the audience is.

Conversation Analysis

This is concerned with the underlying structures of talk in interaction and with the achievement of interaction.

This is inductive, interpretative and can be social constructionalist. Central focus is on inductively generating novel theoretical ideas or hypotheses from the data. These new theories arise out of the data and are supported by the data. So they are said to be grounded.

Evaluation and Interpretation

Authenticity

Is it genuine, complete, reliable and of unquestioned authorship?

Credibility

Is the document free from error or distortion?

Representativeness

Can the documents available be said to constitute a representative sample of the documents that originally existed?

What is the surface meaning? Is there a deeper/semiotic meaning?

Further reading

Robson, C. Real World Research. 3rd edition. Chichester,Wiley:2011.

Richie, J, Lewis J, (eds). Qualitative Research Practice, London: 2003.

Berger A. Media Analysis Techniques. The Sage Commtext Series, Newbury Park: 1991.

Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press:2001. See chapters 17-19.

Gribbs G. Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with Nvivo. Open University Press:2002.

Leedy, P. Practical Research: Planning and Design. 6th Edition. Merril, New Jersey, 1997.

Seale, C. Researching Society and Culture. Sage:2001. See chapters 18 - 21.

Wimmer, R.D. & Dominick, J. R. Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Belmont:1983.

And an example of where I've used it:

Heffernan C. 2001. "The Irish media and the lack of public debate on new reproductive technologies (NRTs) in Ireland", Health, 5 (3):355-371. http://hea.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/5/3/355

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

A bibliometric review of innovations in sustainable tourism research: current trends and future research agenda.

1. Introduction

2. theoretical background, 3. materials and methods, 4.1. contribution and citation trends of countries, 4.2. contribution of the institutions, 4.3. contributions of the authors, 4.4. prolific journals and publishers, 4.5. most common keywords, 4.6. citation analysis, 5. discussion.

• Inter-country collaboration. Forming a research cluster encompassing several countries not only extends the boundaries of the research to the international (or global) level but also enables generating higher-quality research and obtaining more reliable and widely applicable results.
• Leading institution. Considering inter-institutional (or inter-country) collaboration, authors are encouraged to evaluate the familiarity of the institution among scholarly society. Partnering with a well-known institution may lead to wider dissemination of the research results as the name of the institution can attract researchers’ interest in the publication [ 18 ].
• Journal choice. It is acknowledged that the multidisciplinary or more general areas representing journals may reach wider audiences considering that domain-related journals are crucial for the smoother development of the field of knowledge. Therefore, publishing in tourism-related journals should be considered regarding the further perspectives of acknowledgment by scholarship and the researcher’s reputation. The number of citations of tourism research in non-tourism disciplines is very small compared to the tens of thousands of internal citations within tourism research [ 92 ].
• Topic choice. Two extremes can be envisioned in this regard. On the one extreme, exceptionally tourism-focused research can be chosen. However, such a choice is extremely conceptual and hardly performable. Therefore, the collaboration and adoption of know-how from other disciplines can be chosen. The academic discourse surrounding tourism’s interdisciplinary approach has long piqued the interest of the scholarly community [ 93 ].

6. Conclusions

Author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

• Dimitrijević, M.S. Technological Progress in the Function of Productivity and Sustainability of Agriculture: The Case of Innovative Countries and the Republic of Serbia. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023 , 14 , 100856. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sharma, G.; Dahlstrand, Å.L. Innovations, Informality, and the Global South: A Thematic Analysis of Past Research and Future Directions. Technol. Soc. 2023 , 75 , 102359. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Al-Sulaiti, A.; Madhoun, I.T.; Abdella, G.M.; Al-Yafei, H.; Hamouda, A.M. Innovation Ecosystems in Hydrocarbon-Based Economies: Opportunities and Challenges. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 14194. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dodds, R. Introduction: Innovations in Sustainable Tourism. Téoros 2012 , 31 , 55–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• El Archi, Y.; Benbba, B.; Kabil, M.; Dávid, L.D. Digital Technologies for Sustainable Tourism Destinations: State of the Art and Research Agenda. Adm. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 184. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Solangi, Y.A. Analysis of Factors and Strategies for the Implementation of Sustainable Tourism in a Green Economic Structure in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2024 , 434 , 140011. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grigaliūnaitė, V.; Pažėraitė, A.; Račkauskas, M. Save Myself or Others? The Influence of Attitude toward FMCG Products from Recycled Material on the Intention to Buy Them: Hidden Motives and the Role of Income. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 11528. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Bruyn, C.; Ben Said, F.; Meyer, N.; Soliman, M. Research in Tourism Sustainability: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis from 1990 to 2022. Heliyon 2023 , 9 , e18874. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hjalager, A.-M. Innovation Patterns in Sustainable Tourism. Tour. Manag. 1997 , 18 , 35–41. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tsekouropoulos, G.; Gkouna, O.; Theocharis, D.; Gounas, A. Innovative Sustainable Tourism Development and Entrepreneurship through Sports Events. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 4379. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tuzunkan, D. The Relationship between Innovation and Tourism: The Case of Smart Tourism. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2017 , 12 , 14861–14867. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gretzel, U.; Sigala, M.; Xiang, Z.; Koo, C. Smart Tourism: Foundations and Developments. Electron Mark. 2015 , 25 , 179–188. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Williams, A.M.; Rodriguez, I.; Makkonen, T. Innovation and Smart Destinations: Critical Insights. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020 , 83 , 102930. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ivars-Baidal, J.A.; Vera-Rebollo, J.F.; Perles-Ribes, J.; Femenia-Serra, F.; Celdrán-Bernabeu, M.A. Sustainable Tourism Indicators: What’s New within the Smart City/Destination Approach? J. Sustain. Tour. 2023 , 31 , 1556–1582. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Edwards, D.; Martinac, I.; Miller, G. Research Agenda for Innovation in Sustainable Tourism. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2008 , 8 , 56–61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, C. Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Data Inf. Sci. 2017 , 2 , 1–40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abdi Khalife, M.; Dunay, A.; Illés, C.B. Bibliometric Analysis of Articles on Project Management Research. Period. Polytech. Soc. Man. Sci. 2020 , 29 , 70–83. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pilelienė, L.; Jucevičius, G. A Decade of Innovation Ecosystem Development: Bibliometric Review of Scopus Database. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 16386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Antolini, F.; Terraglia, I.; Cesarini, S. Integrating Multiple Data Sources to Measure Sustainable Tourism in Italian Regions. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2024 , 95 , 101959. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vargáné Csobán, K. The Assessment of Sustainable Tourism. Acta Agrar. Debr. 2005 , 16 , 414–421. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pan, S.-Y.; Gao, M.; Kim, H.; Shah, K.J.; Pei, S.-L.; Chiang, P.-C. Advances and Challenges in Sustainable Tourism toward a Green Economy. Sci. Total Environ. 2018 , 635 , 452–469. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bayrak, G.Ö. Sustainable Tourism. In Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility ; Idowu, S.O., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Gupta, A.D., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 2483–2489. ISBN 978-3-642-28035-1. [ Google Scholar ]
• Torres-Delgado, A.; Saarinen, J. Using Indicators to Assess Sustainable Tourism Development: A Review. Tour. Geogr. 2014 , 16 , 31–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kilipiris, F.; Zardava, S. Developing Sustainable Tourism in a Changing Environment: Issues for the Tourism Enterprises (Travel Agencies and Hospitality Enterprises). Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012 , 44 , 44–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Seraphin, H.; Korstanje, M.; Gowreesunkar, V. Diaspora and Ambidextrous Management of Tourism in Post-Colonial, Post-Conflict and Post-Disaster Destinations. J. Tour. Cult. Chang. 2020 , 18 , 113–132. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hall, C.M. Constructing Sustainable Tourism Development: The 2030 Agenda and the Managerial Ecology of Sustainable Tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2019 , 27 , 1044–1060. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gössling, S. Global Environmental Consequences of Tourism. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2002 , 12 , 283–302. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peeters, P.; Çakmak, E.; Guiver, J. Current Issues in Tourism: Mitigating Climate Change in Sustainable Tourism Research. Tour. Manag. 2024 , 100 , 104820. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fu, M.; Huang, S.; Ahmed, S. Assessing the Impact of Green Finance on Sustainable Tourism Development in China. Heliyon 2024 , 10 , e31099. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rehman, S.U.; Khan, S.N.; Antohi, V.M.; Bashir, S.; Fareed, M.; Fortea, C.; Cristian, N.P. Open Innovation Big Data Analytics and Its Influence on Sustainable Tourism Development: A Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Economic, Policy, and Behavioral Factors. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2024 , 10 , 100254. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hussain, S.; Ahonen, V.; Karasu, T.; Leviäkangas, P. Sustainability of Smart Rural Mobility and Tourism: A Key Performance Indicators-Based Approach. Technol. Soc. 2023 , 74 , 102287. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vo Thanh, T.; Seraphin, H.; Okumus, F.; Koseoglu, M.A. Organizational Ambidexterity in Tourism Research: A Systematic Review. Tour. Anal. 2020 , 25 , 137–152. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wilkerson, B.; Trellevik, L.-K.L. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation: Improving Problem Definition through Combined Design Thinking and Systems Mapping Approaches. Think. Ski. Creat. 2021 , 42 , 100932. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shafiee, S.; Rajabzadeh Ghatari, A.; Hasanzadeh, A.; Jahanyan, S. Developing a Model for Sustainable Smart Tourism Destinations: A Systematic Review. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2019 , 31 , 287–300. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Singh, S.; Aggarwal, Y. In Search of a Consensus Definition of Innovation: A Qualitative Synthesis of 208 Definitions Using Grounded Theory Approach. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2022 , 35 , 177–195. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sardak, S.; Dzhyndzhoian, V.; Samoilenko, A. Global Innovations in Tourism. Innov. Mark. 2016 , 12 , 45–50. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Buckley, R. Sustainable Tourism: Research and Reality. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012 , 39 , 528–546. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Séraphin, H.; Butcher, J. Tourism Management in the Caribbean: The Case of Haiti. Caribb. Q. 2018 , 64 , 254–283. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Séraphin, H.; Smith, S.M.; Scott, P.; Stokes, P. Destination Management through Organisational Ambidexterity: Conceptualising Haitian Enclaves. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018 , 9 , 389–392. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Buhalis, D.; Harwood, T.; Bogicevic, V.; Viglia, G.; Beldona, S.; Hofacker, C. Technological Disruptions in Services: Lessons from Tourism and Hospitality. JOSM 2019 , 30 , 484–506. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sustacha, I.; Baños-Pino, J.F.; Del Valle, E. The Role of Technology in Enhancing the Tourism Experience in Smart Destinations: A Meta-Analysis. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2023 , 30 , 100817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, S.M.; Trimi, S. Innovation for Creating a Smart Future. J. Innov. Knowl. 2018 , 3 , 1–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alsharif, A.H.; Salleh, N.Z.M.; Al-Zahrani, S.A.; Khraiwish, A. Consumer Behaviour to Be Considered in Advertising: A Systematic Analysis and Future Agenda. Behav. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alsharif, A.H.; Salleh, N.Z.M.; Abdullah, M.; Khraiwish, A.; Ashaari, A. Neuromarketing Tools Used in the Marketing Mix: A Systematic Literature and Future Research Agenda. SAGE Open 2023 , 13 , 215824402311565. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shukla, A.K.; Muhuri, P.K.; Abraham, A. A Bibliometric Analysis and Cutting-Edge Overview on Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2020 , 92 , 103625. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement. Syst. Rev. 2015 , 4 , 1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021 , 372 , n71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alsharif, A.; Md. Salleh, N.Z.; Pilelienė, L. A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of fNIRS and fMRI Technology in Neuromarketing. Sci. Ann. Econ. Bus. 2023 , 70 , 459–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moustakas, L. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Social Cohesion from 1994–2020. Publications 2022 , 10 , 5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khan, M.; Woo, M.; Nam, K.; Chathoth, P. Smart City and Smart Tourism: A Case of Dubai. Sustainability 2017 , 9 , 2279. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kumpulainen, M.; Seppänen, M. Combining Web of Science and Scopus Datasets in Citation-Based Literature Study. Scientometrics 2022 , 127 , 5613–5631. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Granda-Orive, J.I.; Alonso-Arroyo, A.; Roig-Vázquez, F. Which Data Base Should We Use for Our Literature Analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS. Arch. De Bronconeumol. 2011 , 47 , 213. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Eysenbach, G. Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles. PLoS Biol. 2006 , 4 , e157. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Dorta-González, P.; Dorta-González, M.I. Citation Differences across Research Funding and Access Modalities. J. Acad. Librariansh. 2023 , 49 , 102734. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McAllister, J.; Torres, J. Discovering Open Access Trends in Engineering: A Bibliometric Analysis of Open Access Publications at a Large Research University. Sci. Technol. Libr. 2023 , 42 , 50–67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alsharif, A.H.; Mohd Isa, S. Revolutionizing Consumer Insights: The Impact of fMRI in Neuromarketing Research. Futur Bus J 2024 , 10 , 79. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hjalager, A.-M. Tourism and the Environment: The Innovation Connection. J. Sustain. Tour. 1996 , 4 , 201–218. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lawton, L.J.; Weaver, D.B. Normative and Innovative Sustainable Resource Management at Birding Festivals. Tour. Manag. 2010 , 31 , 527–536. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chao, R.-F. Development of Slow Tourism Challenge and Operation Architecture: A Case Study on Green Island, Taiwan. Acta Oeconomica 2015 , 65 , 351–367. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nair, V.; Hussain, K.; Lo, M.C.; Ragavan, N.A. Benchmarking Innovations and New Practices in Rural Tourism Development: How Do We Develop a More Sustainable and Responsible Rural Tourism in Asia? WW Hosp. Tour. Themes 2015 , 7 , 530–534. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grančay, M. COVID-19 and Central European Tourism: The Competitiveness of Slovak Tourist Guides. CEBR 2020 , 9 , 81–98. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bhaskara, G.I.; Filimonau, V.; Wijaya, N.M.S.; Suryasih, I.A. Innovation and Creativity in a Time of Crisis: A Perspective of Small Tourism Enterprises from an Emerging Destination. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023 , 46 , 101093. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Andrés, A. Author Production. In Measuring Academic Research ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 23–30. ISBN 978-1-84334-528-2. [ Google Scholar ]
• Della Corte, V.; Del Gaudio, G.; Sepe, F.; Sciarelli, F. Sustainable Tourism in the Open Innovation Realm: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 6114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chau, K.Y.; Lin, C.-H.; Tufail, B.; Tran, T.K.; Van, L.; Nguyen, T.T.H. Impact of Eco-Innovation and Sustainable Tourism Growth on the Environmental Degradation: The Case of China. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraživanja 2023 , 36 , 2150258. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xu, F.; Nash, N.; Whitmarsh, L. Big Data or Small Data? A Methodological Review of Sustainable Tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020 , 28 , 144–163. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cardoso, C. The Contribution of Tourism towards a More Sustainable and Inclusive Society: Key Guiding Principles in Times of Crisis. WHATT 2020 , 12 , 679–689. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Garcia, D.A.; Cumo, F.; Sforzini, V.; Albo, A. Eco Friendly Service Buildings and Facilities for Sustainable Tourism and Environmental Awareness in Protected Areas ; WIT Press: A Coruna, Spain, 2012; pp. 323–330. [ Google Scholar ]
• Candia, S.; Pirlone, F.; Spadaro, I. Integrating the Carrying Capacity Methodology into Tourism Strategic Plans: A Sustainable Approach to Tourism. IJSDP 2020 , 15 , 393–401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Szromek, A.R. The Sustainable Business Model of Spa Tourism Enterprise—Results of Research Carried Out in Poland. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021 , 7 , 73. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• González-Reverté, F.; Gomis-López, J.M.; Díaz-Luque, P. Reset or Temporary Break? Attitudinal Change, Risk Perception and Future Travel Intention in Tourists Experiencing the COVID-19 Pandemic. JTF 2022 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Santosa, H.; Yudono, A.; Adhitama, M.S. The Digital Management System of the Tangible Culture Heritage for Enhancing Historic Building Governance in Malang, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021 , 738 , 012056. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Florido, C.; Jacob, M.; Payeras, M. How to Carry out the Transition towards a More Circular Tourist Activity in the Hotel Sector. The Role of Innovation. Adm. Sci. 2019 , 9 , 47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Weaver, D. Creative Periphery Syndrome? Opportunities for Sustainable Tourism Innovation in Timor-Leste, an Early Stage Destination. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2018 , 43 , 118–128. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Idris, I.; Adi, K.R.; Firmansyah, R.; Nadhianty, A.; Mobaroq, M.H.; Putri, P.G.; Pratama, A.S.; Wahono, E.R. Developing smart tourism using virtual reality as a tourism promotion strategy in indonesia. GTG 2021 , 35 , 332–337. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ito, J.Y.; Silveira, F.F.; Munhoz, I.P.; Akkari, A.C.S. International Publication Trends in Lean Agile Management Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023 , 219 , 666–673. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sharma, G.D.; Thomas, A.; Paul, J. Reviving Tourism Industry Post-COVID-19: A Resilience-Based Framework. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021 , 37 , 100786. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hall, J.; Matos, S.; Sheehan, L.; Silvestre, B. Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid: A Recipe for Inclusive Growth or Social Exclusion? J Manag. Stud. 2012 , 49 , 785–812. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• He, P.; He, Y.; Xu, F. Evolutionary Analysis of Sustainable Tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2018 , 69 , 76–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Coghlan, A. Facilitating Reef Tourism Management through an Innovative Importance-Performance Analysis Method. Tour. Manag. 2012 , 33 , 767–775. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van, N.T.T.; Vrana, V.; Duy, N.T.; Minh, D.X.H.; Dzung, P.T.; Mondal, S.R.; Das, S. The Role of Human–Machine Interactive Devices for Post-COVID-19 Innovative Sustainable Tourism in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 9523. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Garau, C. Perspectives on Cultural and Sustainable Rural Tourism in a Smart Region: The Case Study of Marmilla in Sardinia (Italy). Sustainability 2015 , 7 , 6412–6434. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aman, J.; Abbas, J.; Mahmood, S.; Nurunnabi, M.; Bano, S. The Influence of Islamic Religiosity on the Perceived Socio-Cultural Impact of Sustainable Tourism Development in Pakistan: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 3039. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Elmo, G.C.; Arcese, G.; Valeri, M.; Poponi, S.; Pacchera, F. Sustainability in Tourism as an Innovation Driver: An Analysis of Family Business Reality. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 6149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, Z.; Wang, D.; Abbas, J.; Hassan, S.; Mubeen, R. Tourists’ Health Risk Threats Amid COVID-19 Era: Role of Technology Innovation, Transformation, and Recovery Implications for Sustainable Tourism. Front. Psychol. 2022 , 12 , 769175. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Nitti, M.; Pilloni, V.; Giusto, D.; Popescu, V. IoT Architecture for a Sustainable Tourism Application in a Smart City Environment. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2017 , 2017 , 1–9. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Coles, T.; Dinan, C.; Warren, N. Energy Practices among Small- and Medium-Sized Tourism Enterprises: A Case of Misdirected Effort? J. Clean. Prod. 2016 , 111 , 399–408. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Karagiannis, D.; Metaxas, T. Sustainable Wine Tourism Development: Case Studies from the Greek Region of Peloponnese. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 5223. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H. What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior. J. Doc. 2008 , 64 , 45–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Devkota, N.; Kmeco, Ľ.; Thapa, S.; Houška, P.; Poudel, U.R. Tourists’ Perception of Travel Risk and Management in Destination amid COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from Nepal. J. Tour. Serv. 2022 , 25 , 90–119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pilelienė, L.; Alsharif, A.H.; Bader Alharbi, I. Scientometric analysis of scientific literature on neuromarketing tools in advertising. BJES 2022 , 8 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wardle, C.; Buckley, R. Tourism Citations in Other Disciplines. Ann. Tour. Res. 2014 , 46 , 166–168. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cardoso, L.; Araujo, A.; Silva, R.; Almeida, G.G.F.D.; Campos, F.; Santos, L.L. Demystifying Neurotourism: An Interdisciplinary Approach and Research Agenda. EJTR 2023 , 36 , 3618. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jafari, J.; McCabe, S. Emergence: Annals and the Evolving Research and Publishing Landscape in Tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2024 , 104 , 103720. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nowacki, M.; Nurkowska, M. Crisis Management in Restaurants: The Case of Polish Restaurants during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 14631. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Simpson, J.J.; Schuler Scott, A. Enemy of My Enemy Is My Friend: War Volunteer Tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2023 , 101 , 103612. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dolnicar, S.; McCabe, S. Solidarity Tourism How Can Tourism Help the Ukraine and Other War-Torn Countries? Ann. Tour. Res. 2022 , 94 , 103386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gong, Y.; Schroeder, A. A Systematic Literature Review of Data Privacy and Security Research on Smart Tourism. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022 , 44 , 101019. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ladkin, A.; Mooney, S.; Solnet, D.; Baum, T.; Robinson, R.; Yan, H. A Review of Research into Tourism Work and Employment: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on Tourism Work and Employment. Ann. Tour. Res. 2023 , 100 , 103554. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saito, H.; Ruhanen, L. Power in Tourism Stakeholder Collaborations: Power Types and Power Holders. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2017 , 31 , 189–196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nowacki, M.; Kowalczyk-Anioł, J. Experiencing Islands: Is Sustainability Reported in Tourists’ Online Reviews? J. Ecotour. 2023 , 22 , 59–79. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pilelienė, L.; Grigaliūnaitė, V. Elaboration of holistic tourist satisfaction index model for Lithuania. BJES 2019 , 5 , 17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, G.G.F.D.; Cardoso, L. Discussions between Place Branding and Territorial Brand in Regional Development—A Classification Model Proposal for a Territorial Brand. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 6669. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, G.G.F.D.; Almeida, P.; Cardoso, L.; Lima Santos, L. Uses and Functions of the Territorial Brand over Time: Interdisciplinary Cultural-Historical Mapping. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 6448. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Séraphin, H.; Chaney, D. A Research Agenda for the Sustainability of the Tourism Industry: A Childism Perspective on Overtourism. J. Clean. Prod. 2023 , 414 , 137556. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Seraphin, H.; Sheeran, P.; Pilato, M. Over-Tourism and the Fall of Venice as a Destination. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018 , 9 , 374–376. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dias, F.T.P.; Góis, S.M.R.; Gomes, G.N.D.C.O. Tourism Monitoring as a Strategic Tool for Tourism Management: The Perceptions of Entrepreneurs from Centro de Portugal. Adm. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Beal, L.; Séraphin, H.; Modica, G.; Pilato, M.; Platania, M. Analysing the Mediating Effect of Heritage Between Locals and Visitors: An Exploratory Study Using Mission Patrimoine as a Case Study. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 3015. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nowacki, M.; Niezgoda, A. What Experiences Do Tourists Seek in National Parks? Analysis of TripAdvisor Reviews. EiS 2023 , 84 , 341–359. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bauer, I. Response to ‘Tourism Citations in Other Disciplines’. Ann. Tour. Res. 2015 , 53 , 99–100. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dresler, E. Multiplicity of Moral Emotions in Educational Dark Tourism. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023 , 46 , 101094. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Batyk, I.M.; Žukovskis, J.; Pilelienė, L. Determinants of Cross-Border Food Purchases on the European Union Market: Research Results from the Lithuanian–Polish Border. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 10288. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pilelienė, L.; Batyk, I.M.; Žukovskis, J. Cross-Border Shopping on the European Union Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Market: Determinants of Lithuanian Shoppers’ Behavior in Poland. Sustainability 2023 , 16 , 102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Michalko, G.; Ratz, T. Typically Female Features in Hungarian Shopping Tourism. Mijracijske I Enticke Teme 2006 , 22 , 79–93. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moradi, E.; Ehsani, M.; Saffari, M.; Norouzi Seyed Hosseini, R. Developing an Integrated Model for the Competitiveness of Sports Tourism Destinations. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2022 , 26 , 100743. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Castro, D.; Kim, S.; Assaker, G. An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents of Residents’ Support for Future Film Tourism Development. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023 , 45 , 101067. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Polat, N. Technical Innovations in Cruise Tourism and Results of Sustainability. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015 , 195 , 438–445. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Łapko, A.; Hącia, E.; Strulak-Wójcikiewicz, R.; Çınar, K.; Panai, E.; Lučić, L. Eco-Friendly Tourism Decision Making during COVID-19—Sailing Tourism Example. Sustainability 2021 , 14 , 134. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, J.; An, K.; Jang, S. Threshold Effect and Mechanism of Tourism Industrial Agglomeration on Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from Coastal Urban Agglomerations in China. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2023 , 246 , 106908. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luongo, S.; Sepe, F.; Del Gaudio, G. Regional Innovation Systems in Tourism: The Role of Collaboration and Competition. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023 , 9 , 100148. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Salgado-Criado, J.; Mataix-Aldeanueva, C.; Nardini, S.; López-Pablos, C.; Balestrini, M.; Rosales-Torres, C.S. How Should We Govern Digital Innovation? A Venture Capital Perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2024 , 200 , 123198. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, S.; Liu, W.; Han, W.; Xie, J.; Sun, M. Influence Mechanism of Tourists’ Impulsive Behavior in E-Sports Tourism: Mediating Role of Arousal. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022 , 44 , 101032. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Abbas, J.; He, C.; Pilař, L.; Shah, S.A.R. Tourism, Urbanization and Natural Resources Rents Matter for Environmental Sustainability: The Leading Role of AI and ICT on Sustainable Development Goals in the Digital Era. Resour. Policy 2023 , 82 , 103445. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mihalache, M.; Mihalache, O.R. Organizational Ambidexterity and Sustained Performance in the Tourism Industry. Ann. Tour. Res. 2016 , 56 , 142–144. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goo, J.; Huang, C.D.; Yoo, C.W.; Koo, C. Smart Tourism Technologies’ Ambidexterity: Balancing Tourist’s Worries and Novelty Seeking for Travel Satisfaction. Inf Syst Front 2022 , 24 , 2139–2158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Alsharif, A.H.; Md Salleh, N.Z.; Pilelienė, L.; Al-Zahrani, S.A. Exploring the Tourism, Neuro-Tourism, and Hospitality Nexus: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. JoTS 2023 , 14 , 197–221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Song, H.; Van Der Veen, R.; Li, G.; Chen, J.L. The Hong Kong Tourist Satisfaction Index. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012 , 39 , 459–479. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Pilelienė, L.; Grigaliūnaitė, V.; Bogoyavlenska, Y. A Bibliometric Review of Innovations in Sustainable Tourism Research: Current Trends and Future Research Agenda. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167124

Pilelienė L, Grigaliūnaitė V, Bogoyavlenska Y. A Bibliometric Review of Innovations in Sustainable Tourism Research: Current Trends and Future Research Agenda. Sustainability . 2024; 16(16):7124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167124

Pilelienė, Lina, Viktorija Grigaliūnaitė, and Yuliya Bogoyavlenska. 2024. "A Bibliometric Review of Innovations in Sustainable Tourism Research: Current Trends and Future Research Agenda" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 7124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167124

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

AI Powered Legal Research: Transforming Case Preparation and Legal Strategy

By Sanjay Deshmukh

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly transformed various industries, with law being no exception. AI-powered legal research is emerging as a significant disruptor in the legal landscape in India and worldwide, reshaping how lawyers prepare for cases and develop legal strategies

The Traditional Legal Research Process

Historically, legal research has been labor-intensive, requiring lawyers to sift through vast amounts of case law, statutes, legal precedents, and academic literature. This manual research is not only time-consuming but also prone to human error, often leading to inefficiencies in case preparation

Additionally, finding relevant judgments or precedents often requires significant experience and domain knowledge. Junior lawyers or litigants without adequate resources may find themselves at a disadvantage, as access to the right legal materials has traditionally been a matter of both expertise and accessibility to expensive legal databases.

How AI is Changing Legal Research

AI-powered tools are now transforming legal research by automating several key processes. With AI’s ability to analyze vast amounts of data in a fraction of the time a human would take, it allows lawyers to focus on higher-value tasks, such as formulating legal arguments or negotiating settlements. Some ways in which AI is transforming legal research and strategy include:

Advanced Case Law Search

AI-powered legal research platforms like Lexis+AI in the US and some of newer AI-driven tools in India are streamlining the legal research process. These platforms use natural language processing (NLP) to understand queries in human language, allowing lawyers to search for cases, statutes, and precedents with greater precision. AI can quickly locate relevant case laws, even from older judgments that might otherwise have been overlooked, significantly enhancing the depth of legal research.

Predictive Analytics

One of the most promising aspects of AI in legal research is its ability to predict case outcomes. By analyzing patterns in past rulings, AI can provide insights into how a particular judge might rule on a case based on previous judgments, the nature of the case, and the legal arguments presented. This ability to forecast potential outcomes is incredibly useful for lawyers when devising legal strategies, allowing them to anticipate opposing arguments and adjust their approach accordingly.

Document Review and Analysis

Another area where AI is proving indispensable is in document review and contract analysis. AI can swiftly analyze contracts, legal documents, and briefs to identify key clauses, inconsistencies, and risks. It can flag potential legal issues that might have otherwise gone unnoticed during manual review. This speeds up the due diligence process, ensuring that case preparation is thorough and accurate.

Cost Efficiency

Legal research in India has traditionally been expensive, with top-tier law firms having access to proprietary databases and extensive libraries. AI democratizes legal research by making it more accessible to smaller firms and independent practitioners. As AI tools become more prevalent, the cost of accessing comprehensive legal databases is expected to decrease, making high-quality research accessible to a broader section of the legal fraternity.

Impact on Legal Strategy

AI is not only reshaping how legal research is conducted but also transforming how legal strategies are developed. With the ability to predict case outcomes, analyze precedents, and review documents rapidly, AI tools empower lawyers to craft more precise and effective legal strategies.

Challenges and Ethical Considerations

Despite its numerous advantages, the integration of AI in legal research also presents certain challenges. One key concern is the accuracy of AI predictions and analyses. While AI tools are highly advanced, they are not infallible and may occasionally produce biased or incorrect results based on the data they have been trained on.

Another challenge is the ethical question of whether AI might eventually replace certain aspects of a lawyer’s role. While AI can enhance efficiency, it cannot replicate human judgment, empathy, or the nuanced understanding of complex legal principles.

AI-powered legal research is poised to favourably impact the Indian legal system by streamlining case preparation and enhancing the development of legal strategies. By automating repetitive tasks, providing predictive insights, and making legal research more accessible, however, it is essential to approach this transformation with a balanced perspective, recognizing both the opportunities and challenges it presents.

(The author is Sanjay Deshmukh, COO, Findability Sciences, and the views expressed in this article are his own)

You Might Also Like

Bridging the Cybersecurity Skills Gap: A Global Call to Secure Our Digital Future

Introducing Automatic URL Categorization: Enhanced Security and Efficiency

Five Key Advantages of Embracing Hybrid Data Centers

The Road to Post-Quantum Cryptography  

Useful Links

Information

Copyright © 2024 Trivone. All Rights Reserved.

MEMBERSHIP PROGRAMS

• Law.com Pro
• Law.com Pro Mid-Market
• Global Leaders In Law
• Global Leaders In Law Advisers
• Private Client Global Elite

MEDIA BRANDS

• Law.com Radar
• American Lawyer
• Corporate Counsel
• National Law Journal
• Legal Tech News

New York Law Journal

• The Legal Intelligencer
• The Recorder
• Connecticut Law Tribune
• Daily Business Review
• Daily Report
• Delaware Business Court Insider
• Delaware Law Weekly
• New Jersey Law Journal
• Texas Lawyer
• Supreme Court Brief
• Litigation Daily
• Deals & Transactions
• Law Firm Management
• Legal Practice Management
• Legal Technology
• Intellectual Property
• Cybersecurity
• Law Journal Newsletters
• Analyst Reports
• Diversity Scorecard
• Kirkland & Ellis
• Latham & Watkins
• Baker McKenzie
• Verdict Search
• Law.com Compass
• China Law & Practice
• Insurance Coverage Law Center
• Law Journal Press
• Lean Adviser Legal
• Legal Dictionary
• Law Catalog
• Expert Witness Search
• Recruiters Directory
• Editorial Calendar

Legal Newswire

• Lawyer Pages
• Law Schools
• Women in Influence (WIPL)
• GC Profiles
• How I Made It
• Instant Insights
• Special Reports
• Resource Center
• LMA Member Benefits
• Legal Leaders
• Trailblazers
• Expert Perspectives
• Lawjobs.com
• Book Center
• Professional Announcements
• Asset & Logo Licensing

Content Source

Content Type

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map

Advertise  |  Customer Service  |  Terms of Service

FAQ  |  Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 ALM Global, LLC.

All Rights Reserved.

• Law Topics Litigation Transactional Law Law Firm Management Law Practice Management Legal Technology Intellectual Property Cybersecurity Browse All ›
• LegalTech Event (current)
• LegalWeek Event Perspectives (current)
• All Sections Events Cybersecurity & Privacy Legal Operations Products & Software Cases & Legislation Updates From the Experts Vendor Updates Expert Witness Search Lawjobs.com CLE Center Book Center Law.com Radar Public Notices Sitemap

LTN Insights

Tracking Generative AI: How Evolving AI Models Are Impacting Legal

A running compilation of how the legal landscape continues to be shaped by generative AI tools, from GPT technologies to art generation tools and beyond.

August 21, 2024 at 12:00 PM

200 minute read

Artificial Intelligence

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing.

Below is a digest of coverage of generative AI from Legaltech News and across ALM.

Want to continue reading? Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free!

Benefits of a digital membership.

• Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
• Access to the entire ALM network of websites
• Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
• Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
• Search by a wide range of topics

Register Now

Already have an account? Sign In Now

*May exclude premium content

You Might Like

Spellbook Launches 'Spellbook Associate,' a Legal AI Agent for Transactions

By Isha Marathe

Minnesota State Bar Takes Big Step Toward Launching Gen AI Regulatory Sandbox

By Rhys Dipshan

Coinbase Slams SEC's Proposal to Amend Definition of Term 'Exchange'

By Michael A. Mora

Writers Sue Anthropic for Allegedly Stealing 'Hundreds of Thousands' of Books to Train AI Models

By Kat Black

Special Report

• The Artificial Intelligence Glossary
• GPT 101: Decoding ChatGPT's Generative AI for Legal Professionals
• ChatGPT Is Impressive, But Can (and Should) It Be Used in Legal?
• Data Privacy Watch: Keeping Up with the Evolving Patchwork of Laws

Trending Stories

New York-Based Clifford Chance Partner Missing in Mike Lynch Yacht Disaster

The American Lawyer

New York Lawyers 'Stunned and Devastated' Over Chris Morvillo Disappearance

American Lawyer Industry Awards and Corporate Practices of the Year Finalists Announced

After Latham Mandates 4 Days in NY Office in 2025, Other Firms Sticking to 3 Days, For Now

Willkie Adds 11-Attorney Capital Markets Group From Mayer Brown

• 25 Years of the Am Law 200: Is Size as a Strategy a Winning Formula?
• People, Places & Profits, Part III: Are Law Firm Financial Metrics Keeping Pace With Inflationary Growth?
• The A-List, Innovation, and Professional Development: How Market Trends Are Impacting What it Takes to Be a Well-Rounded Firm

Featured Firms

Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates P.C. 75 Ponce De Leon Ave NE Ste 101 Atlanta , GA 30308 (470) 294-1674 www.garymartinhays.com

Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone 2 Oliver St #608 Boston , MA 02109 (857) 444-6468 www.marksalomone.com

Smith & Hassler 1225 N Loop W #525 Houston , TX 77008 (713) 739-1250 www.smithandhassler.com

Presented by BigVoodoo

More From ALM

• Events & Webcasts

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.

Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a biotechnology patent associate or patent agent with an advanced degree in biology, biochem...

Associates with 0 to 5 years experience to work in the areas of commercial litigation, construction law, and private and public contract la...

Professional Announcement

Subscribe to Legaltech News

Don't miss the crucial news and insights you need to make informed legal decisions. Join Legaltech News now!

Already have an account? Sign In