Practice your Order of Operations skills with these expressions
Simplifies expressions by using the Order of Operations.
Looking for someone to help you with algebra? At Wyzant, connect with algebra tutors and math tutors nearby. Prefer to meet online? Find online algebra tutors or online math tutors in a couple of clicks.
Whether you're getting ready for an exam or simply want to refresh your knowledge of the order of operations in math, we've created a comprehensive and easy-to-follow guide for you.
Read on to find simple definitions of the order of operations and related terms, practical examples, and a fun quiz to test your knowledge.
Have you ever tried to solve a math problem, where you didn't know where to start or what to do next?
For example, when you see 3 + 8 × 2 - 6, what should you do first?
The order of operations is a set of rules that tells us what math operation to do first in an expression with multiple operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
Following the order of operations, when solving 3 + 8 × 2 - 6, we would first do the:
3 + 8 × 2 – 6 = 13
One way to remember the order of operations is by the acronym PEMDAS.
Watch our video to learn more.
PEMDAS is an acronym that reminds us of the sequence of steps to follow when solving mathematical expressions with multiple operations.
Much like grammatical rules that govern how we build sentences, PEMDAS is a set of rules mathematicians came up with and agree to follow so that we can have consistency and clarity when performing calculations.
Different countries have their own ways of remembering the order of math operations.
When solving math expressions with multiple operations, we follow these steps from left to right .
There is a fun way of remembering the PEMDAS rule with the left to right rule using a playful mnemonic:
“ lease xcuse y ear unt ally and et her est” |
arentheses, xponents, ( ultiplication, ivision), ( ddition, ubtraction) – from eft to ight |
Now, let’s work through each step of PEMDAS.
The first step to the order of operations is parentheses. This means that when we’re solving an expression with multiple operations, we first solve the operations within parentheses (). Here’s a simple example to illustrate.
3 x (4 + 2)
Sometimes, math expressions contain a set of parentheses inside another set. To solve them, start by solving the operations inside the innermost parentheses , then work your way outward.
For example: {4 x [5 +(6 – 3)]} – (8 – 2)
The second step in the order of operations is exponents. Exponents, also known as indices, show how many times a number is multiplied by itself.
To illustrate, 3⁴ is an exponent form that means multiply 3 by itself 4 times, or 3 x 3 x 3 x 3.
Let’s look at this example:
2 2 + 4 x 2
Refresh Your Memory: What Does Squared Mean in Math?
In the order of operations, multiplication and division are prioritized equally and are performed from left to right as they appear in the expression. This is why we consider them together as the third step in PEMDAS.
Let’s see that in practice with: 8 ÷ 2 × 4 + 3
As the last steps of PEDMAS, we work on the addition and subtraction.
Just like multiplication and division, addition and subtraction are prioritized equally and are performed from left to right as they appear in the expression.
For example:
10 – 4 + 3
Now that we have covered each step of PEMDAS, let’s look at a more challenging example:
Find more tips in our Order of Operations Series Part 2 .
PEMDAS makes solving math expressions much easier than simply memorizing the order of operations, but students sometimes forget the steps to take.
Here are some common mistakes to keep an eye on when solving math expressions with multiple operations:
Some students forget PEMDAS and just focus on the left-to-right approach, which might feel natural because of how we read.
It's important to remember that while going left to right can work, it's only suitable when you're solving expressions that only contain addition and subtraction, or multiplication and division.
For example, using the left to right approach works if you are trying to solve:
8 – 6 + 9 – 3
Or, if you are trying to solve:
8 ÷ 2 × 9 ÷ 3
But let's say you are trying to solve:
10 – 3 x 2 + 5 ÷ 5
As you can see, this expression contains subtraction, multiplication, addition, and division.
If we go from left to right – first subtracting 3 from 10 to get 7, then multiplying 7 by 2 to get 14, then adding 5 to it to get 19, and finally diving 19 by 5, we get 3.8 which is an incorrect result.
But if we follow PEMDAS, which tells us to start with multiplication and division (left to right) before we get to addition and subtraction, we get:
= 10 – 6 + 1
The correct answer is 5 .
Many students tend to do addition before subtraction in math problems because they learned addition before subtraction or because they're close together in the order of operations. Some also think that because A comes before S in PEMDAS you should always do addition before subtraction.
For instance, in the expression 8 – 2 + 3 you might tackle the addition before the subtraction and get: 8 – 5 = 3.
In the order of operations, addition and subtraction have the same priority which is why we have to use left-to-right approach and perform subtraction first:
= 6 + 3
Similarly to addition vs. subtractions, students often think multiplication comes before division because that's what they've learned before or because they're used to seeing multiplication listed first in math problems. Another mistake is believing M comes before D in PEMDAS because you always do multiplication before division.
For example, in the expression 6 ÷ 2 × 3 = 6 ÷ 6 = 1 , a student might do the multiplication first and get a wrong result:
6 ÷ 2 × 3 = 6 ÷ 6 = 1
But we know by now that multiplication and division are equally important. So, we need to work from left to right and do the division first:
6 ÷ 2 × 3 = 3 × 3 = 9
Using PEMDAS, let’s solve this one:
3 x (8 – 4) 2 + 6 ÷ 2
Let’s do the same for this expression:
3 x (7 – 2) + 6 ÷ 2
Finally, we can work on this one:
80 ÷ (6 + 7 x 2) – 5
Frequently asked questions about the order of operations.
Discover clear and easy-to-understand explanations about the rules and steps for solving math problems using the order of operations.
Yes, PEMDAS applies to all mathematical operations involving multiple steps, including addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and exponentiation
BODMAS and BEDMAS , just like PEDMAS are mnemonic devices used to remember the order of operations in mathematics:
When there are parentheses within one another (nested parentheses), you should start by doing the innermost expressions first and then work your way outwards.
Mathnasium’s specially trained tutors work with students of all skill levels to help them learn and master any K-12 math topic, including order of operations.
Our tutors assess each student’s skills to develop personalized learning plans that will put them on the best path towards math excellence.
Find a Mathnasium Learning Center near you, schedule an assessment, and enroll today!
Find a Math Tutor Near You
Answer a few questions to see how it works, my child is:.
Mathnasium meets your child where they are and helps them with the customized program they need, for any level of mathematics.
What is pemdas explained for elementary school students.
Here is everything you need to know about PEMDAS, including how to use it and remember it, examples, and a fun quiz to test what you’ve learned.
In this middle- and high-school-friendly introduction to geometric transformations, you’ll find simple definitions, examples, and a fun quiz. Enjoy!
Find simple definitions, key terms, solved examples, and practice materials in our middle-school-friendly guide to rotation in math.
We have nearly 1,000 neighborhood centers nationwide. get started now..
Algebra topics -, order of operations, algebra topics order of operations.
Lesson 1: order of operations, introduction to the order of operations.
How would you solve this problem?
12 - 2 ⋅ 5 + 1
The answer you get will depend largely on the order in which you solve the problem. For example, if you work the problem from left to right —12-2, then 10⋅5, then add 1—you'll get 51 .
12 - 2 ⋅ 5 + 1 10 ⋅ 5 + 1 50 + 1 51
On the other hand, if you solve the problem in the opposite direction—from right to left —the answer will be 0 .
12 - 2 ⋅ 5 + 1 12 - 2 ⋅ 6 12 - 12 0
Finally, what if you did the math in a slightly different order? If you multiply first, then add , the answer is 3 .
12 - 2 ⋅ 5 + 1 12 - 10 + 1 2 + 1 3
It turns out that 3 actually is the correct answer because it's the answer you get when you follow the standard order of operations . The order of operations is a rule that tells you the right order in which to solve different parts of a math problem. ( Operation is just another way of saying calculation. Subtraction, multiplication, and division are all examples of operations.)
The order of operations is important because it guarantees that people can all read and solve a problem in the same way. Without a standard order of operations, formulas for real-world calculations in finance and science would be pretty useless—and it would be difficult to know if you were getting the right answer on a math test!
The standard order of operations is:
Multiplication and division, addition and subtraction.
In other words, in any math problem you must start by calculating the parentheses first, then the exponents , then multiplication and division , then addition and subtraction . For operations on the same level, solve from left to right . For instance, if your problem contains more than one exponent, you'd solve the leftmost one first, then work right.
Let's look at the order of operations more closely and try another problem. This one might look complicated, but it's mainly simple arithmetic. You can solve it using the order of operations and some skills you already have.
4 / 2 ⋅ 3 + (4 + 6 ⋅ 2) + 18 / 3 2 - 8
Always start with operations contained within parentheses. Parentheses are used to group parts of an expression.
If there is more than one set of parentheses, first solve for the ones on the left. In this problem, we only have one set:
In any parentheses, you follow the order of operations just like you do with any other part of a math problem.
Here, we have two operations: addition and multiplication . Because multiplication always comes first, we'll start by multiplying 6 ⋅ 2 .
4 / 2 ⋅ 3 + (4 + 6 ⋅ 2 ) + 18 / 3 2 - 8
6 ⋅2 is 12. Next, we'll add 4 .
4 / 2 ⋅ 3 + ( 4 + 12 ) + 18 / 3 2 - 8
4+12 is 16 . So we've simplified our parentheses to 16 . Since we just have a single number in the parentheses, we can get rid of them all together—they're not grouping together anything now.
4 / 2 ⋅ 3 + 16 + 18 / 3 2 - 8
Second, solve any exponents . Exponents are a way of multiplying a number by itself. For instance, 2 3 is 2 multiplied by itself three times, so you would solve it by multiplying 2 ⋅2 ⋅2 . (To learn more about exponents, review our lesson here ).
There's only one exponent in this problem : 3 2 . 3 2 is 3 multiplied by itself twice —in other words, 3 ⋅ 3 .
3 ⋅ 3 is 9 , so 3 2 can be simplified as 9 .
4 / 2 ⋅ 3 + 16 + 18 / 9 - 8
Next, look for any multiplication or division operations. Remember, multiplication doesn't necessarily come before division—instead, these operations are solved from left to right .
Starting from the left means that we need to solve 4 / 2 first.
4 divided by 2 is 2 . That makes our next problem 2 ⋅ 3 .
2 ⋅ 3 + 16 + 18 / 9 - 8
2 ⋅ 3 is 6 . Finally, there's only one multiplication or division problem left: 18 / 9 .
6 + 16 + 18 / 9 - 8
18 / 9 is 2 . There's nothing left to multiply or divide, so we can move on to the next and final part of the Order of Operations: addition and subtraction .
6 + 16 + 2 - 8
Our problem looks a lot simpler to solve now. All that's left is addition and subtraction.
Just like we did with multiplication and division, we'll add and subtract from left to right . That means that first we'll add 6 and 16 .
6 + 16 is 22 . Next, we need to add 22 to 2 .
22 + 2 is 24 . Only one operation left: 24 - 8 .
24-8 is 16 . That's it!
We're done! We've solved the entire problem, and the answer is 16 . In other words, 4 / 2 ⋅ 3 + ( 4 + 6 ⋅ 2 ) + 18 / 3 2 - 8 equals 16 .
4 / 2 ⋅ 3 + (4 + 6 ⋅ 2) + 18 / 3 2 - 8 = 16
Whew! That was a lot to say, but once we broke it down into the right order it really wasn't that complicated to solve. When you're first learning the order of operations, it might take you a while to solve a problem like this. With enough practice, though, you'll get used to solving problems in the right order.
If you use it a lot, you'll eventually get the hang of the order of operations. Until then, it can be helpful to use a word or phrase to remember it. Two popular ones are the nonsense word PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction) and the phrase Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally .
/en/algebra-topics/exponents/content/
Imagine you’re getting ready for a walk. You grab your shoes and socks and head to the couch. Which do you put on first: shoes or socks? Of course, it’s your socks. That’s the correct order.
Now, imagine two friends attempting to simplify this expression: \(28 – 3 × 5 + 10\) . The first friend simplifies the expression to 23, and the second friend simplifies the expression to 135. Who is right? The first friend. They remembered to use the order of operations. The second friend “tried to put the shoes on first,” meaning they computed the first operation they came across, giving them an incorrect result. Just like prepping for your walk, simplifying expressions requires a set order, also known as the order of operations.
Many people use the acronym PEMDAS to help remember the order of operations. PEMDAS stands for “Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction.” The acronym also helps to remember that we start simplifying the expression from left to right, just like we read “PEMDAS” from left to right.
Let’s use PEMDAS to take a closer look at the order of operations.
\(28 – 3 × 5 + 10\)
Start by scanning the expression for “P” – parentheses. If you encounter a multiple-term expression inside the parentheses, continue to apply the same order of operations inside the parentheses to accurately simplify it before moving on to the next step. It’s worth noting that you should also look for brackets and braces in this step as well.
There are no parentheses in this expression, so we continue to the next operation: “E” for exponents.
Exponents can be found anywhere in the expression, including on the outside of parentheses. When this happens, be sure to compute what’s inside the parentheses before applying the exponent. There are no exponents in this expression, so we move on to the next step.
Now, we are looking for “MD” (either multiplication or division). Multiplication and division are inverse operations, so they are considered a set. This means we would use whichever operation comes first, from left to right.
This expression has a multiplication operator ( \(3 × 5\) ), so we compute that first: \(3 × 5 = 15\) . To stay organized, we rewrite the expression below the original, showing our result for the first operation, \(28 – 3 × 5 + 10\) becomes \(28 – 15 + 10\) .
We are ready to look for the last set of operations and finish simplifying this expression. The final set of operations “AS” – addition and subtraction. Just like multiplication and division, addition and subtraction are a set of inverse operations, so we treat them the same by using whichever operation comes first from left to right. In this expression, subtraction comes first, so we compute the subtraction, \(28 – 15 = 13\) , and then compute the addition: \(13 + 10 = 23\) .
Okay, before we work through some other problems, let’s review what PEMDAS stands for: Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction. Follow this order of operations and complete any inverse operations (multiplication/division and addition/subtraction) from left to right.
All right, let’s use PEMDAS to solve the following practice questions:
1. Use the order of operations to simplify this expression to three terms.
\((73 – 5^2 × 2) + 21 – 3\)
Show Answer The correct answer is C!
The first step when simplifying this expression is the exponent inside the parentheses.
\((73 – 25 × 2) + 21 – 3\)
Next is the multiplication inside the parentheses.
\((73 – 25 × 2) + 21 – 3\)
\((73 – 50) + 21 – 3\)
Finally, subtract inside the parentheses to simplify to three terms.
\((73 – 50) + 21 – 3\)
\(23 + 21 – 3\)
If you selected choice A or B, you subtracted too soon and did not compute inside the parentheses first. If you selected choice D, you did not use the order of operations inside the parentheses. The first step to simplifying this expression is to compute the exponent inside the parentheses, then multiply, and then subtract.
2. Look at the two simplifications for the expression.
Which student is correct, and what mistake did the other student make?
Show Answer The correct answer is B!
When computing addition and subtraction in an expression, always work from left to right and use the operation to the left first. In this expression, that is subtraction. So, Amir’s simplification is correct, and Bart added before subtracting.
That’s all for this review. Thanks for watching, and happy studying!
What is the order of operations in math.
The order of operations is the order you use to work out math expressions: parentheses, exponents, multiplication, division, addition, subtraction. All expressions should be simplified in this order. The only exception is that multiplication and division can be worked at the same time, you are allowed to divide before you multiply, and the same goes for addition and subtraction. However, multiplication and division MUST come before addition and subtraction. The acronym PEMDAS is often used to remember this order.
Ex. Use the order of operations to simplify the expression \(3×4^2+8-(11+4)^2÷3\).
Parentheses: \(3×4^2+8-(15)^2÷3\)
Exponents: \(3×16+8-225÷3\)
Multiplication/Division: \(48+8-75\)
Addition/Subtraction: \(-19\)
Yes, always use the order of operations to simplify expressions. If there are no parentheses, then skip that step and move on to the next one. The same applies for any other missing operation.
Ex.Use the order of operations to simplify the expression \(6^2-4+2\).
Parentheses: There are none, so skip this step.
Exponents: \(36-4+2\)
Multiplication/Division: There isn’t any, so skip this step.
Addition/Subtraction: \(34\)
No, most calculators do not follow the order of operations, so be very careful how you plug numbers in! Make sure you follow the order of operations, even if that means plugging in numbers in a different order from how they look on your page.
Parentheses are the first operation to solve in an equation. If there are no parentheses, then move through the order of operations (PEMDAS) until you find an operation you do have and start there.
The four basic operations are: addition (+), subtraction (-), multiplication (×), and division (÷).
\(7\times9+3-6\div2+2^2-11\)
The correct answer is 56. The order of operations can be remembered by the acronym PEMDAS, which stands for: parentheses, exponents, multiplication and division from left to right, and addition and subtraction from left to right. \(7×9+3-6÷2+2^2-11\) There are no parentheses in this problem, so start with exponents. \(7×9+3-6÷2+4-11\) Then, multiply and divide from left to right. \(63+3-6÷2+4-11\) \(63+3-3+4-11\) Finally, add and subtract from left to right. \(66-3+4-11\) \(63+4-11\) \(67-11\) \(56\)
\(19+7(26-48÷2)^3+3×6\)
The correct answer is 93. The order of operations can be remembered by the acronym PEMDAS, which stands for: parentheses, exponents, multiplication and division from left to right, and addition and subtraction from left to right. \(19+7(26-48÷2)^3+3×6\) First, start with parentheses. The order of operations must be followed even inside parentheses, so be sure to divide before you subtract. \(19+7(26-24)^3+3×6\) \(19+7(2)^3+3×6\) Next comes exponents. \(19+7(8)+3×6\) Then, multiply from left to right. \(19+56+3×6\) \(19+56+18\) Finally, add from left to right. \(75+18\) \(93\)
\(11+3-7×2+1×4÷2\)
The correct answer is 2. The order of operations can be remembered by the acronym PEMDAS, which stands for: parentheses, exponents, multiplication and division from left to right, and addition and subtraction from left to right. \(11+3-7×2+1×4÷2\) There are no parentheses or exponents, so start with multiplication and division from left to right. \(11+3-14+1×4÷2\) \(11+3-14+4÷2\) \(11+3-14+2\) Finally, add and subtract from left to right. \(14-14+2\) \(0+2\) \(2\)
\(3(11+2)^2-18÷6\)
The correct answer is 504. The order of operations can be remembered by the acronym PEMDAS, which stands for: parentheses, exponents, multiplication and division from left to right, and addition and subtraction from left to right. \(3(11+2)^2-18÷6\) First, simplify what is in parentheses. \(3(13)^2-18÷6\) Then, do any exponents. \(3(169)-18÷6\) Next, multiply and divide from left to right. \(507-18÷6\) \(507-3\) Finally, subtract. \(504\)
\((16-24)^2+3×11-1\)
The correct answer is 96. The order of operations can be remembered by the acronym PEMDAS, which stands for: parentheses, exponents, multiplication and division from left to right, and addition and subtraction from left to right. \((16-24)^2+3×11-1\) First, simplify the parentheses. \((-8)^2+3×11-1\) Then, do exponents. \(64+3×11-1\) Next, multiply. \(64+33-1\) Finally, add and subtract from left to right. \(97-1\) \(96\)
Use our free printable order of operations worksheets for additional practice!
Return to Basic Arithmetic Videos
by Mometrix Test Preparation | Last Updated: August 30, 2024
Welcome to the order of operations worksheets page at Math-Drills.com where we definitely follow orders! This page includes Order of Operations worksheets using whole numbers, integers, decimals and fractions.
Elementary and middle school students generally use the acronyms PEMDAS or BEDMAS to help them remember the order in which they complete multi-operation questions. The 'P' or 'B' in the acronym stands for parentheses or brackets. All operations within parentheses get completed first. The 'E' refers to exponents; all exponents are calculated after the parentheses. The 'M' and 'D' are interchangeable as one completes the multiplication and division in the order that they appear from left to right. The fourth and final step is to solve for the addition and subtraction in the order that they appear from left to right.
More recently, students are being taught the acronym, PEMA, for order of operations, to avoid the confusion inherent in the other acronyms. For example, in PEMDAS, multiplication comes before division which some people incorrectly assumes means that multiplication must be done before division in an order of operations question. In fact, the two operations are completed in the order that they occur from left to right in the question. This is recognized in PEMA which more correctly shows that there are four levels to complete in an order of operations question.
Unless you want your students doing something different than the rest of the world, it would be a good idea to get them to understand these rules. There is no discovery or exploration needed here. These are rules that need to be learned and practiced and have been accepted as the standard approach to solving any multi-step mathematics problem.
The worksheets in this section include questions with parentheses, addition, and multiplication. Exponents, subtraction, and division are excluded. The purpose of excluding some parts of PEMDAS is to ease students into how the order of operations works. To help students see a purpose for the order of operations, try to associate the expressions with related scenarios. For example, 2 + 7 × 3 could refer to the number of days in two days and three weeks. (9 + 2) × 15 could mean the total amount earned if someone worked 9 hours yesterday and 2 hours today for $15 an hour.
The worksheets in this section include questions with parentheses, addition, subtraction, and multiplication. Exponents and division are excluded. This section is similar to the previous one in that it is meant to help ease students into the order of operations without complicating things with exponents and division.
One last section to help ease students into the order of operations or simply for students who haven't learned about exponents yet. The questions on the worksheets in this section include parentheses and all four operations.
The worksheets in this section include questions with parentheses, exponents and all four operations.
The worksheets in this section include parentheses, exponents, and all four operations.
As with other order of operation worksheets, the fractions order of operations worksheets require some prerequisite knowledge. If your students struggle with these questions, it probably has more to do with their ability to work with fractions than the questions themselves. Observe closely and try to pin point exactly what prerequisite knowledge is missing then spend some time going over those concepts/skills before proceeding. Otherwise, the worksheets below should have fairly straight-forward answers and shouldn't result in too much hair loss.
Copyright © 2005-2024 Math-Drills.com You may use the math worksheets on this website according to our Terms of Use to help students learn math.
PEMDAS Worked Examples Multiplication by Juxtaposition Fractions & Grouping
Most of the issues with simplifying using the order of operations stem from nested parentheses, exponents, and "minus" signs. So, in the examples that follow, I'll be demonstrating how to work with these sorts of expressions.
Content Continues Below
The Order of Operations
(Links are provided for additional review of working with negatives, grouping symbols, and powers.)
I will simplify from the inside out. First, I'll simplify inside the parentheses, and then inside the square brackets, being careful to remember that the "minus" sign on the 3 in front of the brackets goes with the 3 . Only once the grouping parts are done will I do the division, followed by adding in the 4 .
4 − 3[4 −2(6 − 3)] ÷ 2
4 − 3[4 − 2(3)] ÷ 2
4 − 3[4 − 6] ÷ 2
4 − 3[−2] ÷ 2
4 + 6 ÷ 2
Remember that, in leiu of grouping symbols telling you otherwise, the division comes before the addition, which is why this expression simplified, in the end, down to " 4 + 3 ", and not " 10 ÷ 2 ".
(If you're not feeling comfortable with all of those "minus" signs, review Negatives .)
I must remember to simplify inside the parentheses before I square, because (8 − 3) 2 is not the same as 8 2 − 3 2 .
16 − 3(8 − 3) 2 ÷ 5
16 − 3(5) 2 ÷ 5
16 − 3(25) ÷ 5
16 − 75 ÷ 5
16 − 15
If you have learned about variables and combining "like" terms , you may also see exercises such as this:
If I have trouble taking a subtraction through a parentheses, I can turn it into multiplying a negative 1 through the parentheses (note the highlighted red " 1 " below):
14 x + 5[6 − (2 x + 3)]
14 x + 5[6 − 1 (2 x + 3)]
14 x + 5[6 − ( 1 )(2 x ) − ( 1 )(+3))]
14 x + 5[6 − 2 x − 3]
14 x + 5[6 − 3 − 2 x ]
14 x + 5[3 − 2 x ]
14 x + 5(3) + 5(−2 x )
14 x + 15 − 10 x
14 x − 10 x + 15
It isn't required that you rearrange the terms to group "like" terms together, but it's generally a good idea to do so, certainly when you're just starting out. But, by grouping appropriately, it's a lot harder to lose terms when you're adding things up.
I need to remember to simplify at each step, combining like terms when and where I can. I'll start by inserting the "understood" 1 's in front of the subtracted grouping symbols:
−{2 x − [3 − (4 − 3 x )] + 6 x }
−1{2 x − 1[3 − 1(4 − 3 x )] + 6 x }
−1{2 x − 1[3 − 1(4) − 1(−3 x )] + 6 x }
−1{2 x − 1[3 − 4 + 3 x ] + 6 x }
−1{2 x − 1[−1 + 3 x ] + 6 x }
−1{2 x − 1(−1) −1(+3 x ) + 6 x }
−1{2 x + 1 − 3 x + 6 x }
−1{2 x + 6 x − 3 x + 1}
−1{5 x + 1}
−1(5 x ) − 1(+1)
−5 x − 1
(For more examples of this sort, review Simplifying with Parentheses .)
Advertisement
Expressions containing fractional forms can cause confusion, too. But, as long as you work the numerator (that is, the top) and the denominator (that is, the bottom) separately, until they're completely simplified first, and only then combine (or reduce), if possible, then you should be fine.
If a fractional form is added to, or subtracted from, another term, fractional or otherwise, make sure you've completely simplified and reduced the fractional form before you try to do the addition or subtraction.
Before I can add the two fractional terms, I first have to simplify each term.
[45]/[8(5 − 4) − 3] + [3(2) 2 ]/[5 − 3]
[45]/[8(1) − 3] + [3(4)]/[2]
[45]/[8 − 3] + [12]/[2]
[45]/[5] + 6
As it happens, each of the fractions above simplified to whole numbers, so I didn't have to muck about with common denominators. You will not usually be so lucky.
To do this simplification, I have to work the top and bottom separately, until I get a fraction that I can (possibly) reduce.
[(3 − 2) + (1 + 2) 2 ]/[5 + (4 − 1)]
[(1) + (3) 2 ]/[5 + (3)]
[1 + 9]/[8]
(For examples with loads of exponents, review Simplifying with Exponents .)
You can use the Mathway widget below to practice simplifying using the order of operations. Try the entered exercise, or type in your own exercise. Then click the button and select "Simplify" or "Evaluate" from the pop-up box to compare your answer to Mathway's. (Or skip the widget and continue to the next page.)
Please accept "preferences" cookies in order to enable this widget.
(Click "Tap to view steps" to be taken directly to the Mathway site for a paid upgrade.)
URL: https://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4
College math, homeschool math, share this page.
The order of operations is a specific order or a set of rules, agreed upon by mathematicians, one must follow when performing arithmetic operations to simplify expressions.
Here is the order for doing operations that you need to follow in the order given below to avoid having different answers when simplifying expressions. If grouping symbols are used such as parentheses, braces, or curly brackets, perform the operations inside the grouping symbols first. Then, proceed with exponents, and so forth...
1. Simplify any expression within parentheses, brackets or grouping symbols: ( ) [ ] { }
2. Simplify powers or expressions involving exponents: 4 2 , 2 5 , or 5 3
3. Multiply and divide in order from left to right: × and ÷
4. Add and subtract in order from left to right: + and -
Study the example in the figure below carefully so that you understand how to use the order of operations!
Example #1: 4 2 - 6 × 2 ÷ 4 × 3 + 5
Do exponent:
16 - 6 × 2 ÷ 4 × 3 + 5
Multiply and divide from left to right
16 - 12 ÷ 4 × 3 + 5 16 - 3 × 3 + 5
16 - 9 + 5 Add and subtract from left to right 16 - 9 + 5
Example #2: (2 + 5 2 ) + 4 × 3 - 10
Do parenthesis: (2 + 25) + 4 × 3 - 10
27 + 4 × 3 - 10
Do multiplication
27 + 12 - 10
Example #3:
10 - 14 ÷ 2 = 10 - 7 = 3 (Division comes before subtraction)
Remember that if you see multiplication and division at the same time, perform the operation from left to right.
Example #4:
4 + 5 ÷ 5 × 6 = 4 + 1 × 6 = 4 + 6 =10
The following acronyms can make it easier for you to remember the order of operations.
The following mnemonic may help you remember the PEMDAS rule: PEMDAS ( Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally )
Even though M comes before D in PEMDAS, the two operations have the same precedence. Same precedence means that multiplication is not more important than division. By the same token, even though A comes before S, the two operations have the same precedence. Addition is not more important than subtraction.
A much better way, in my opinion, to write PEMDAS is P - E - MD - AS.
In P - E - MD - AS, operations with the same precedence have no hyphens between them.
For example, since addition and subtraction have the same precedence, there is no need to put a hyphen between them.
However, P and E have a hyphen between them because P has a higher precedence than E.
All the four letters in MDAS, DMAS, DMAS, and DMAS refer to multiplication, division, addition, and subtraction.
Keep in mind also that PEMDAS, BODMAS, BEDMAS, and BIDMAS are all correct ways to perform the order operations. None of them is better than the other. These are just names that are used, based on the country, to make it easier to remember the rules.
Example #5:
Simplify √4 + 1 + {2 - [ (6 - 2) × 5] + 13}.
Work first with the innermost set of parentheses or (6 - 2) .
√4 + 1 + {2 + [(6 - 2) × 5] + 13} = √4 + 1 + {2 - [4 × 5] + 13}
Next, work again first with the inner set of parentheses or [4 × 5] .
√4 + 1 + {2 + [(6 - 2) × 5] + 13} = √4 + 1 + {2 - 20 + 13}
Stay inside the parentheses until you are done. While working inside the parentheses, notice that you need to add and subtract in order from left to right.
√4 + 1 + {2 + [(6 - 2) × 5] + 13} = √4 + 1 + {-18 + 13}
√4 + 1 + {2 + [(6 - 2) × 5] + 13} = √4 + 1 + -5
According to BODMAS rule, you need to do root first.
√4 + 1 + {2 + [(6 - 2) × 5] + 13} = 2 + 1 + -5
Add and subtract again in order from left to right
√4 + 1 + {2 + [(6 - 2) × 5] + 13} = 3 + -5
√4 + 1 + {2 + [(6 - 2) × 5] + 13} = -2
The final answer is -2
Order of operations quiz. see how you understand this lesson..
Order of operations calculator
Order of operations word problems
Why multiply before adding
Order of operations worksheets
Calculators.
100 Tough Algebra Word Problems. If you can solve these problems with no help, you must be a genius!
Recommended
About me :: Privacy policy :: Disclaimer :: Donate Careers in mathematics
Copyright © 2008-2021. Basic-mathematics.com. All right reserved
The interdependence between the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Model and the growth and enhancement of Creative Thinking and Mathematical Problem Solving Skills in Elementary Schools is unquestionable nowadays. Prior studies have yet to discover concrete evidence regarding the interdependence being discussed. This study highlighted cognitive abilities related to creative thinking and mathematics problem-solving by implementing the Project-Based Learning Model. This research was a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest control group design involving 43 students in the sixth grade of two elementary schools; data was collected through test and classroom observation, and then the data was analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). Conversely, students exposed to project-based learning models exhibit higher skill levels in creative thinking and problem-solving than those instructed using conventional learning models. The project-based learning model significantly impacted elementary school children’s creative thinking and mathematics problem-solving skills. These findings suggest that the Project-Based Learning Model is acceptable for instructors seeking to foster creativity in teaching mathematics at the primary school level in Indonesia or other countries with comparable settings.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.8.15
Adijaya, M. A., Widiana, I. W., Parwata, I. G. L. A., & Antara, I. G. W. S. (2023). Bloom’s taxonomy revision-oriented learning activities to improve procedural capabilities and learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.261
Albab, U., Budiyono, & Indriati, D. (2020). Metacognition skills and higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1), Article 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012017
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Münster-Kistner, C. F. V. (2021). Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
Arends, R. I. (2013). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Arici, F. (2023). An examination of the effectiveness of problem-based learning method supported by augmented reality in science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 446–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12752
Astuti, P., Qohar, A., & Hidayanto, E. (2019). Proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal higher order thinking skills berdasarkan pemahaman konseptual dan prosedural [Students’ thinking process in solving higher order thinking skills questions based on conceptual and procedural understanding]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i1.11910
Astutik, S., Mahardika, I. K., Indrawati, Sudarti, & Supeno. (2020). HOTS student worksheet to identification of scientific creativity skill, critical thinking skill and creative thinking skill in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1), Article 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012075
Aziz, A. A. M. A. (2021). The development of the HOTS mathematical problem-solving framework using the Bar model strategy: A need analysis. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(4), 972–981. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.8006811
Babakr, Z. H., Mohamedamin, P., & Kakamad, K. (2019). Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory: Critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(3), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.84
Benraghda, A. (2022). Self-assessment as a self-regulated learning approach in English oral presentations: College students’ choices and perceptions. Cogent Education, 9(1), Article 2123472. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2123472
Cammies, C., Cunningham, J. A., & Pike, R. K. (2022). Not all Bloom and gloom: Assessing constructive alignment, higher order cognitive skills, and their influence on students’ perceived learning within the practical components of an undergraduate biology course. Journal of Biological Education, 58(3), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2092191
Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: A review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
Cheng, L., Wang, M., Chen, Y., Niu, W., Hong, M., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Design my music instrument: A project-based science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics program on the development of creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763948
C?r?t, D. K., & Aydemir, S. (2023). Online scratch activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Computational and creative thinking. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(4), 2111–2120. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.24938
Cook, S. C. (2020). Schema-based instruction for mathematical word problem solving: An evidence-based review for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718823080
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publication.
Cruz, S., Lencastre, J. A., & Viseu, F. (2023). Heuristics and usability testing of a project-based learning online course: A case study with structural mathematical concepts. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16325a
Diego-Mantecon, J. M., Prodromou, T., Lavicza, Z., Blanco, T. F., & Ortiz-Laso, Z. (2021). An attempt to evaluate STEAM project-based instruction from a school mathematics perspective. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01303-9
Edwar, E., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, Z., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2023). Developing a workshop model for high school mathematics teachers constructing HOTS questions through the Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia approach. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp603-626
Gunawardena, M. (2021). Scaffolding students’ critical thinking: A process not an end game. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, Article 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100848
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Handayani, A. D., & Iswantiningtyas, V. (2020). Javanese traditional games as a teaching and learning media to socialize and introduce mathematics since early age. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032008
Hawari, A. D. M., & Noor, A. I. M. (2020). Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11072
Hidayati, Y. M., Ngalim, A., Sutama, Arifin, Z., Abidin, Z., & Rahmawati, E. (2020). Level of combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical problems. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.751038
Hujjatusnaini, N. (2020). The effect of blended project-based learning integrated with 21st-century skills on pre-service biology teachers’ higher-order thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.27148
Irdalisa, I., Zulherman, Z., Elvianasti, M., Widodo, W. S., & Hanum, E. (2024). Effectiveness of project-based learning on STEAM-based student’s worksheet analysis with ecoprint technique. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 10(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.10.1.923
Jiang, B., & Li, Z. (2021). Effect of Scratch on computational thinking skills of Chinese primary school students. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(4), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00190-z
Jiang, Y., Xu, N., Xu, S., & Wang, S. (2022). The enlightenment of Piaget’s theory to Chinese primary school education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 670, 878–882. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220704.158
Junianto, J., & Wijaya, A. (2019). Developing students’ mathematical literacy through problem based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), Article 012035. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012035
Karan, E. (2022). Enhancing students’ problem-solving skills through project-based learning. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v10i1.6887
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Laporan PISA Kemendikbudristek [PISA report of the Ministry of Education and Culture]. PISA 2022 Dan Pemulihan Pembelajaran Indonesia (pp. 1–25). https://balaibahasariau.kemdikbud.go.id/wpcontent/uploads/2023/12/LAPORAN-PISA-KEMENDIKBUDRISTEK.pdf
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Hamid, S. R. A., Abdullah, M. R., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
Kharisma, F. N., Susilowati, S. M. E., & Ridlo, S. (2019). The effective learning models in developing problem-solving skills. KnE Social Sciences, 3(18), 595–604 https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i18.4750
Kim, H. W., & Kim, M. K. (2021). A case study of children’s interaction types and learning motivation in small group project-based learning activities in a mathematics classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2051. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11415
Kurniawan, E. S., Mundilarto, M., & Istiyono, E. (2024). Improving student higher order thinking skills using Synectic-HOTS-oriented learning model. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(2), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25002
Lafmejani, A. Q. (2022). Cognitive evolution of the “Human” concept and its adaptation to Piaget’s theory. Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 8(4), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.32598/CJNS.4.31.355.1
Lazi?, B. D., Kneževi?, J. B., & Mari?i?, S. M. (2021). The influence of project-based learning on student achievement in elementary mathematics education. South African Journal of Education, 41(3), Article 1909. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n3a1909
Leasa, M. (2020). The effect of learning styles on the critical thinking skills in natural science learning of elementary school students. Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 2086–2097. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.763449
Lee, J. S., & Galindo, E. (2021). Examining project-based learning successes and challenges of mathematics preservice teachers in a teacher residency program: Learning by doing. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v15i1.28786
Li, Z. (2022). Assessment of scientific thinking and creativity in an electronic educational environment. International Journal of Science Education, 44(3), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2032863
Lin, X. (2021). Investigating the unique predictors of word-problem solving using meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1097?1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09554-w
Liu, M. (2023). Bayesian optimization and ensemble learning algorithm combined method for deformation prediction of concrete dam. Structures, 54, 981–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.136
Lu, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Creativity in students’ modelling competencies: Conceptualisation and measurement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10055-y
MacLeod, M., & Veen, J. T. V. D. (2020). Scaffolding interdisciplinary project-based learning: A case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1646210
Marbán, J. M., Radwan, E., Radwan, A., & Radwan, W. (2021). Primary and secondary students’ usage of digital platforms for mathematics learning during the COVID19 outbreak: The case of the Gaza strip. Mathematics, 9(2), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9020110
Menggo, S., Pramesti, P. D. M. Y., & Krismayani, N. W. (2023). Integrating project-based learning in preparing students’ interpersonal communication skills on speaking courses in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.12
Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing design education for the 21st century. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002
Michalsky, T. (2024). Metacognitive scaffolding for preservice teachers’ self-regulated design of higher order thinking tasks. Heliyon, 10(2), e2480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24280
Moma, L. (2015). Pengambangan instrumen kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis untuk siswa SMP [Development of mathematical creative thinking instruments for junior high school students]. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v4i1.142
Morteza, T., & Moghaddam, M. Y. (2017). On the plausibility of Bloom’s higher order thinking strategies on learner autonomy: The paradigm shift. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0037-8
Munar, A., Winarti, W., Nai’mah, N., Rezieka, D. G., & Aulia, A. (2022). Improving higher order thinking skill (HOTs) in early children using picture story book. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 4611–4618. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.2224
Muttaqin, H., Susanto, Hobri, & Tohir, M. (2021). Students’ creative thinking skills in solving mathematics higher order thinking skills (HOTs) problems based on online trading arithmetic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1), Article 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012036
Ndiung, S., Sariyasa, Jehadus, E., & Apsari, R. A. (2021). The effect of treffinger creative learning model with the use RME principles on creative thinking skill and mathematics learning outcome. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 873–888. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14249a
Newton, K. J. (2020). Mathematical flexibility: Aspects of a continuum and the role of prior knowledge. Journal of Experimental Education, 88(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1586629
Nizaruddin, N., & Kusmaryono, I. (2023). Transforming students’ pseudo-thinking into real thinking in mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(3), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.3.477
Nuryadin, A., Karlimah, K., Lidinillah, D. A. M., & Apriani, I. F. (2023). Blended learning after the pandemic: The flipped classroom as an alternative learning model for elementary classrooms. Participatory Educational Research, 10(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.52.10.3
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2024). PISA results 2022 (Volume III) – Factsheets: Indonesia. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-results-2022-volume-iii-factsheets_041a90f1-en/indonesia_a7090b49-en.html
Pakpahan, F. H., & Saragih, M. (2022). Theory of cognitive development by Jean Piaget. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v2i2.79
Palinussa, A. L. (2013). Students’ critical mathematical thinking skills and character: Experiments for junior high school students through realistic mathematics education culture-based. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.566.75-94
Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II) – Country notes: Indonesia. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/indonesia_c2e1ae0e-en.html
Prastiti, T. D., Tresnaningsih, S., Mairing, J. P., & Azkarahman, A. R. (2020). HOTS problem on function and probability: Does it impact to students’ mathematical literacy in Universitas Terbuka? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1), Article 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012003
Puccio, G., Lohiser, A., & Seemiller, C. (2021). Understanding convergent thinking: Developing effective critical thinking. In Creative problem solving: A 21st century workplace skill. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071865637
Purwaningsih, E., Sari, A. M., Yuliati, L., Masjkur, K., Kurniawan, B. R., & Zahiri, M. A. (2020). Improving the problem-solving skills through the development of teaching materials with STEM-PjBL (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics-project based learning) model integrated with TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1), Article 012133. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012133
Putri, N., Rusdiana, D., & Suwarma, I. R. (2020). Enhanching physics students’ creative thinking skills using CBL model implemented in STEM in vocational school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, Article 042045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042045
Rahman, M. S., Juniati, D., & Manuharawati, M. (2023). The quality of mathematical proficiency in solving geometry problem: Difference cognitive independence and motivation. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.27
Rehman, N., Zhang, W., Mahmood, A., Fareed, M. Z., & Batool, S. (2023). Fostering twenty-first century skills among primary school students through math project-based learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 424. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01914-5
Roble, D. B., Lomibao, L. S., & Luna, C. A. (2021). Developing students’ creative constructs in mathematics with problem-based (PB) and problem posing (PP) tasks. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth, 13(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjfy29672
Rosidin, U., Suyatna, A., & Abdurrahman, A. (2019). A combined HOTS-based assessment/STEM learning model to improve secondary students’ thinking skills: A development and evaluation study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.518464
Rusilowati, A., Negoro, R. A., Aji, A. P., & Subali, B. (2023). Development of waves critical thinking test: Physics essay test for high school student. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(4), 1781–1794. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1781
Safie, N., & Zakaria, S. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of thinking maps usage by analysing students’ achievement in mathematics subject. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 31(1), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.37934/ARASET.31.1.197209
Sahudra, T. M., Ary, K. K., Ramadhani, D., Asnawi, A., & Handrianto, C. (2021). The impact of project-based flipped learning model on the technological pedagogical content knowledge skill of prospective teachers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5), Article 2606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052606
Saldo, I. J. P., & Walag, A. M. P. (2020). Utilizing problem-based and project-based learning in developing students’ communication and collaboration skills in physics. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-8-5-1
Samsudin, M. A., Jamali, S. M., Zain, A. N. M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2020). The effect of STEM project based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.15
Schindler, M., & Bakker, A. (2020). Affective field during collaborative problem posing and problem solving: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 303?324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09973-0
Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. OECD. Available at https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/programmes/edu/pisa/publications/national-reports/pisa-2018/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
Serin, H. (2023). Teaching mathematics: The role of project-based learning. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i2p378
Setianingsih, R., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Muksar, M. (2017). Investigating fifth-grade students’ construction of mathematical knowledge through classroom discussion. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(4), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/619
Shidqi, L., Trisniawati, T., & Rhosyida, N. (2023). The development of kobatar learning media for learning mathematics in elementary school. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 886–892. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.02.015
Simonton, K. L. (2021). Project-based learning and its potential in physical education: An instructional model inquiry. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 12(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2020.1862683
Sofiyan, S., Amalia, R., & Suwardi, A. B. (2020). Development of mathematical teaching materials based on project-based learning to improve students’ HOTS and character. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), Article 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012006
Son, A. L., Darhim, D., & Fatimah, S. (2020). Students’ mathematical problem-solving ability based on teaching models intervention and cognitive style. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222
Suanto, E., Maat, S. M., & Zakaria, E. (2023). The effectiveness of the implementation of three dimensions geometry KARA module on higher order thinking skills (HOTS) and motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1636a
Sukkeewan, P., Songkram, N., & Nasongkhla, J. (2024). Development and validation of a reliable and valid assessment tool for measuring innovative thinking in vocational students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 10(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.10.1.835
Suratno, S., Wahono, B., Chang, C. Y., Retnowati, A., & Yushardi, Y. (2020). Exploring a direct relationship between students’ problem-solving abilities and academic achievement: A STEM education at a coffee plantation area. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.22
Syahriridani, M., Susilo, H., & Ibrohim, I. (2022). Developing problem based learning through lesson study. Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, 1(2), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v1i2.20
Syamsuddin, A., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2020). Understanding the problem solving strategy based on cognitive style as a tool to investigate reflective thinking process of prospective teacher. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2614?2620. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080644
Tamur, M., Ndiung, S., Nurjaman, A., & Jerito, P. (2020). Do differences in measured mathematical abilities moderate the effectiveness of the realistic mathematics education approach? Meta-analysis studies. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 7(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v7i1.15736
Tanjung, H. S., Nababan, S. A., Sa’dijah, C., & Subanji, S. (2020). Development of assessment tools of critical thinking in mathematics in the context of HOTS. Advances in Mathematics: Scientific Journal, 9(10), 8659–8667. https://doi.org/10.37418/amsj.9.10.91
Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2021). Mathematics instruction to promote mathematics higher-order thinking skills of students in Indonesia: Moving forward. TEM Journal, 10(4), 1945–1954. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM104-60
Vink, I. C. D., Hornstra, L., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2023). Latent profile analysis of working memory: Relations with creativity and academic achievement. Creativity Research Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2183323
Wang, X. M. (2023). An online progressive peer assessment approach to project-based learning: A constructivist perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(5), 2073–2101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10257-6
Widiatsih, A., Wardani, D. A. R., Royhana, U., Djamali, F., & Septory, B. J. (2020). The development of mathematical problems based on higher order thinking skills (HOTS) on comparative material by implementing PBL and its effect on the teacher’s creative thinking skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1538(1), Article 012110. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012110
Widyaningsih, S. W., & Yusuf, I. (2019). The project-based learning model is based on simple teaching tools and critical thinking skills. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v1i1.33
Wijaya, T. T., Zhou, Y., Ware, A., & Hermita, N. (2021). Improving the creative thinking skills of the next generation of mathematics teachers using dynamic mathematics software. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(13), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i13.21535
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated with a mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10214a
Zulyusri, Z., Elfira, I., Lufri, L., & Santosa, T. A. (2023). Literature study: Utilization of the PjBL model in science education to improve creativity and critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2555
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493
COMMENTS
4 (2)² − 10 ÷ 5 + 8. The next part of PEMDAS is exponents (and square roots). There is one exponent in this problem that squares the number 2 (i.e., what we found by simplifying the expression in the parentheses). This gives us 2 × 2 = 4. So now our equation looks like this: 4 (4) − 10 ÷ 5 + 8 OR 4 × 4 − 10 ÷ 5 + 8.
Learn how to calculate things in the correct order. Calculate them in the wrong order, and you can get a wrong answer! Order of Operations PEMDAS Operations "Operations" mean things like add, subtract, multiply, divide, squaring, etc. If it isn't a number it is probably an operation.
Good luck! Part 1: Order of Operations problems involving addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Part 2: Order of Operations problems involving the four arithmetic operations and parenthesis (or nested grouping symbols) Part 3: Order of Operations problems involving the four arithmetic operations, parentheses and exponents.
Why Follow the Order of Operations? We follow the rules of the order of operations to solve expressions so that everyone arrives at the same answer. Here's an example of how we can get different answers if the correct order of operations is NOT followed: Solved Examples On Order Of Operations. Example 1: Solve: 2 + 6 × (4 + 5) ÷ 3 - 5 ...
Let's solve this Order of Operations problem as we learn some PEMDAS rules. 4² - ( 3 x 5 ) + 9 ፥ 3 x 2 Pemdas Rule for Parenthesis When solving order of operation problems, first complete the operations that are found inside the parenthesis or brackets.. In our example problem, we would multiply 3 x 5 first because it is in the parenthesis. P E M D A S
Order of Operations (PEMDAS) The fundamental concept behind the order of operations is to perform arithmetic operators in the "right" order or sequence. Let's take a look at how Rob and Patty tried to simplify a given numerical expression by applying the order or rule of operations. He carelessly simplified the numerical expressions by ...
PEMDAS: Remembering Math's Order of Operations. PEMDAS is the tried-and-true method that gives us the order to work when solving mathematical problems. HowStuffWorks. Nearly every middle school in the U.S. teaches its students to remember this simple phrase: "Please excuse my dear Aunt Sally."
What is the order of operations? Order of operations refers to the rule that explains the sequence of steps necessary for correctly evaluating a mathematical expression or math problem.. You will use the acronym PEMDAS to help recall the correct order, or priority, in which you complete mathematical operations.. Mathematical operations such as multiplication and addition have to be completed ...
The order of operations will allow you to solve this problem the right way. The order is this: Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and finally Addition and Subtraction. Always perform the operations inside a parenthesis first, then do exponents. After that, do all the multiplication and division from left to right, and lastly ...
Mathematicians have devised a standard order of operations for calculations involving more than one arithmetic operation. Rule 1: First perform any calculations inside parentheses. Rule 2: Next perform all multiplications and divisions, working from left to right. Rule 3: Lastly, perform all additions and subtractions, working from left to right.
Order of Operations. The order of operations is a set of rules that is to be followed in a particular sequence while solving an expression. In mathematics with the word operations we mean, the process of evaluating any mathematical expression, involving arithmetic operations such as division, multiplication, addition, and subtraction.
This phrase stands for, and helps one remember the order of: Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and. Addition and Subtraction. This listing tells you the ranks of the operations: Parentheses outrank exponents, which outrank multiplication and division (but multiplication and division are at the same rank), and multiplication ...
Order of Operations. When several operations are to be applied within a calculation, we must follow a specific order to ensure a single correct result. Perform all calculations within the innermost parentheses or grouping symbols. Evaluate all exponents. Perform multiplication and division operations from left to right.
The Order of Operations is very important when simplifying expressions and equations. The Order of Operations is a standard that defines the order in which you should simplify different operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. This standard is critical to simplifying and solving different algebra problems.
Subtract 6 from 2. The order of operations is a set of rules that tells us what math operation to do first in an expression with multiple operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Following the order of operations, when solving 3 + 8 × 2 - 6, we would first do the: Multiplication: 8 x 2 = 16, so we get 3 + 16 - 6.
The standard order of operations is: Parentheses. Exponents. Multiplication and division. Addition and subtraction. In other words, in any math problem you must start by calculating the parentheses first, then the exponents, then multiplication and division, then addition and subtraction. For operations on the same level, solve from left to right.
The order that we use to simplify expressions in math is called the order of operations. The order of operations is the order in which we add, subtract, multiply or divide to solve a problem.
The order of operations is the order you use to work out math expressions: parentheses, exponents, multiplication, division, addition, subtraction. All expressions should be simplified in this order. ... There are no parentheses in this problem, so start with exponents. \(7×9+3-6÷2+4-11\) Then, multiply and divide from left to right. \(63+3-6 ...
When studying math, you learn about a process called the order of operations. This process is a rule that must be followed when solving math problems that have multiple operations such as subtraction, addition, multiplication, division, groupings, and/or exponents. There are many memory tricks for remembering the math order of operations in the ...
This page includes Order of Operations worksheets using whole numbers, integers, decimals and fractions. Elementary and middle school students generally use the acronyms PEMDAS or BEDMAS to help them remember the order in which they complete multi-operation questions. The 'P' or 'B' in the acronym stands for parentheses or brackets.
PEMDAS is an acronym that may help you remember order of operations for solving math equations. PEMDAS is typcially expanded into the phrase, "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally." The first letter of each word in the phrase creates the PEMDAS acronym. Solve math problems with the standard mathematical order of operations, working left to right:
The Order of Operations. (Links are provided for additional review of working with negatives, grouping symbols, and powers.) Simplify 4 − 3 [4 −2 (6 − 3)] ÷ 2. I will simplify from the inside out. First, I'll simplify inside the parentheses, and then inside the square brackets, being careful to remember that the "minus" sign on the 3 in ...
Simplify any expression within parentheses, brackets or grouping symbols: ( ) [ ] { } 2. Simplify powers or expressions involving exponents: 4 2, 2 5, or 5 3. 3. Multiply and divide in order from left to right: × and ÷. 4. Add and subtract in order from left to right: + and -.
Order of Operations. The order of operations is the order you use to solve number sentences that have more than one operation. Operations include parentheses, exponents, multiplication, division, addition, and subtraction. Just follow the order to find the correct answer.
This study highlighted cognitive abilities related to creative thinking and mathematics problem-solving by implementing the Project-Based Learning Model. ... Muttaqin, H., Susanto, Hobri, & Tohir, M. (2021). Students' creative thinking skills in solving mathematics higher order thinking skills (HOTs) problems based on online trading ...