• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01237.x
  • Corpus ID: 26259053

Leadership and management in mental health nursing.

  • N. Blegen , E. Severinsson
  • Published in Journal of Nursing Management 1 May 2011
  • Medicine, Psychology

23 Citations

The importance of communication for clinical leaders in mental health nursing: the perspective of nurses working in mental health, leadership, support and acknowledgement of registered nurses work in acute mental health units., the influences of nursing transformational leadership style on the quality of nurses’ working lives in taiwan: a cross-sectional quantitative study, the new clinical leadership role of senior charge nurses: a mixed methods study of their views and experience., authenticity, creativity and a love of the job: experiences of grassroots leaders of mental health nursing in queensland, global research trends in nursing leadership from 1985 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis., psychiatric nursing managers' attitudes towards containment methods in psychiatric inpatient care., an exploration of the perspectives of associate nurse unit managers regarding the implementation of smoke-free policies in adult mental health inpatient units, action-logics of veterans health administration magnet nurse executives and their practice of supporting nurses to speak up, transformational leadership and ethical leadership: their significance in the mental healthcare system., 34 references, the role of the mental health nursing leadership., leadership styles in nursing management: preferred and perceived., the relationship between nursing leadership and patient outcomes: a systematic review update., solution focused nursing: a fitting model for mental health nurses working in a public health paradigm, nurse executive transformational leadership and organizational commitment, observation: the original sin of mental health nursing, community mental health nursing: keeping pace with care delivery, mental health team leadership and consumers satisfaction and quality of life., the development, implementation, and evaluation of a clinical leadership program for mental health nurses, community psychiatric nurses and the care co-ordinator role: squeezed to provide 'limited nursing'., related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

  • Search Menu

Sign in through your institution

  • Browse content in Arts and Humanities
  • Browse content in Archaeology
  • Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Archaeology
  • Archaeological Methodology and Techniques
  • Archaeology by Region
  • Archaeology of Religion
  • Archaeology of Trade and Exchange
  • Biblical Archaeology
  • Contemporary and Public Archaeology
  • Environmental Archaeology
  • Historical Archaeology
  • History and Theory of Archaeology
  • Industrial Archaeology
  • Landscape Archaeology
  • Mortuary Archaeology
  • Prehistoric Archaeology
  • Underwater Archaeology
  • Zooarchaeology
  • Browse content in Architecture
  • Architectural Structure and Design
  • History of Architecture
  • Residential and Domestic Buildings
  • Theory of Architecture
  • Browse content in Art
  • Art Subjects and Themes
  • History of Art
  • Industrial and Commercial Art
  • Theory of Art
  • Biographical Studies
  • Byzantine Studies
  • Browse content in Classical Studies
  • Classical History
  • Classical Philosophy
  • Classical Mythology
  • Classical Numismatics
  • Classical Literature
  • Classical Reception
  • Classical Art and Architecture
  • Classical Oratory and Rhetoric
  • Greek and Roman Epigraphy
  • Greek and Roman Law
  • Greek and Roman Papyrology
  • Greek and Roman Archaeology
  • Late Antiquity
  • Religion in the Ancient World
  • Social History
  • Digital Humanities
  • Browse content in History
  • Colonialism and Imperialism
  • Diplomatic History
  • Environmental History
  • Genealogy, Heraldry, Names, and Honours
  • Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing
  • Historical Geography
  • History by Period
  • History of Emotions
  • History of Agriculture
  • History of Education
  • History of Gender and Sexuality
  • Industrial History
  • Intellectual History
  • International History
  • Labour History
  • Legal and Constitutional History
  • Local and Family History
  • Maritime History
  • Military History
  • National Liberation and Post-Colonialism
  • Oral History
  • Political History
  • Public History
  • Regional and National History
  • Revolutions and Rebellions
  • Slavery and Abolition of Slavery
  • Social and Cultural History
  • Theory, Methods, and Historiography
  • Urban History
  • World History
  • Browse content in Language Teaching and Learning
  • Language Learning (Specific Skills)
  • Language Teaching Theory and Methods
  • Browse content in Linguistics
  • Applied Linguistics
  • Cognitive Linguistics
  • Computational Linguistics
  • Forensic Linguistics
  • Grammar, Syntax and Morphology
  • Historical and Diachronic Linguistics
  • History of English
  • Language Acquisition
  • Language Evolution
  • Language Reference
  • Language Variation
  • Language Families
  • Lexicography
  • Linguistic Anthropology
  • Linguistic Theories
  • Linguistic Typology
  • Phonetics and Phonology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Sociolinguistics
  • Translation and Interpretation
  • Writing Systems
  • Browse content in Literature
  • Bibliography
  • Children's Literature Studies
  • Literary Studies (Asian)
  • Literary Studies (European)
  • Literary Studies (Eco-criticism)
  • Literary Studies (Romanticism)
  • Literary Studies (American)
  • Literary Studies (Modernism)
  • Literary Studies - World
  • Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)
  • Literary Studies (19th Century)
  • Literary Studies (20th Century onwards)
  • Literary Studies (African American Literature)
  • Literary Studies (British and Irish)
  • Literary Studies (Early and Medieval)
  • Literary Studies (Fiction, Novelists, and Prose Writers)
  • Literary Studies (Gender Studies)
  • Literary Studies (Graphic Novels)
  • Literary Studies (History of the Book)
  • Literary Studies (Plays and Playwrights)
  • Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)
  • Literary Studies (Postcolonial Literature)
  • Literary Studies (Queer Studies)
  • Literary Studies (Science Fiction)
  • Literary Studies (Travel Literature)
  • Literary Studies (War Literature)
  • Literary Studies (Women's Writing)
  • Literary Theory and Cultural Studies
  • Mythology and Folklore
  • Shakespeare Studies and Criticism
  • Browse content in Media Studies
  • Browse content in Music
  • Applied Music
  • Dance and Music
  • Ethics in Music
  • Ethnomusicology
  • Gender and Sexuality in Music
  • Medicine and Music
  • Music Cultures
  • Music and Religion
  • Music and Media
  • Music and Culture
  • Music Education and Pedagogy
  • Music Theory and Analysis
  • Musical Scores, Lyrics, and Libretti
  • Musical Structures, Styles, and Techniques
  • Musicology and Music History
  • Performance Practice and Studies
  • Race and Ethnicity in Music
  • Sound Studies
  • Browse content in Performing Arts
  • Browse content in Philosophy
  • Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art
  • Epistemology
  • Feminist Philosophy
  • History of Western Philosophy
  • Metaphysics
  • Moral Philosophy
  • Non-Western Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Philosophy of Language
  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Philosophy of Perception
  • Philosophy of Action
  • Philosophy of Law
  • Philosophy of Religion
  • Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic
  • Practical Ethics
  • Social and Political Philosophy
  • Browse content in Religion
  • Biblical Studies
  • Christianity
  • East Asian Religions
  • History of Religion
  • Judaism and Jewish Studies
  • Qumran Studies
  • Religion and Education
  • Religion and Health
  • Religion and Politics
  • Religion and Science
  • Religion and Law
  • Religion and Art, Literature, and Music
  • Religious Studies
  • Browse content in Society and Culture
  • Cookery, Food, and Drink
  • Cultural Studies
  • Customs and Traditions
  • Ethical Issues and Debates
  • Hobbies, Games, Arts and Crafts
  • Natural world, Country Life, and Pets
  • Popular Beliefs and Controversial Knowledge
  • Sports and Outdoor Recreation
  • Technology and Society
  • Travel and Holiday
  • Visual Culture
  • Browse content in Law
  • Arbitration
  • Browse content in Company and Commercial Law
  • Commercial Law
  • Company Law
  • Browse content in Comparative Law
  • Systems of Law
  • Competition Law
  • Browse content in Constitutional and Administrative Law
  • Government Powers
  • Judicial Review
  • Local Government Law
  • Military and Defence Law
  • Parliamentary and Legislative Practice
  • Construction Law
  • Contract Law
  • Browse content in Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Criminal Evidence Law
  • Sentencing and Punishment
  • Employment and Labour Law
  • Environment and Energy Law
  • Browse content in Financial Law
  • Banking Law
  • Insolvency Law
  • History of Law
  • Human Rights and Immigration
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Browse content in International Law
  • Private International Law and Conflict of Laws
  • Public International Law
  • IT and Communications Law
  • Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
  • Law and Politics
  • Law and Society
  • Browse content in Legal System and Practice
  • Courts and Procedure
  • Legal Skills and Practice
  • Legal System - Costs and Funding
  • Primary Sources of Law
  • Regulation of Legal Profession
  • Medical and Healthcare Law
  • Browse content in Policing
  • Criminal Investigation and Detection
  • Police and Security Services
  • Police Procedure and Law
  • Police Regional Planning
  • Browse content in Property Law
  • Personal Property Law
  • Restitution
  • Study and Revision
  • Terrorism and National Security Law
  • Browse content in Trusts Law
  • Wills and Probate or Succession
  • Browse content in Medicine and Health
  • Browse content in Allied Health Professions
  • Arts Therapies
  • Clinical Science
  • Dietetics and Nutrition
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Operating Department Practice
  • Physiotherapy
  • Radiography
  • Speech and Language Therapy
  • Browse content in Anaesthetics
  • General Anaesthesia
  • Browse content in Clinical Medicine
  • Acute Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Clinical Genetics
  • Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
  • Dermatology
  • Endocrinology and Diabetes
  • Gastroenterology
  • Genito-urinary Medicine
  • Geriatric Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Medical Toxicology
  • Medical Oncology
  • Pain Medicine
  • Palliative Medicine
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonology
  • Rheumatology
  • Sleep Medicine
  • Sports and Exercise Medicine
  • Clinical Neuroscience
  • Community Medical Services
  • Critical Care
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Forensic Medicine
  • Haematology
  • History of Medicine
  • Browse content in Medical Dentistry
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Paediatric Dentistry
  • Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics
  • Surgical Dentistry
  • Browse content in Medical Skills
  • Clinical Skills
  • Communication Skills
  • Nursing Skills
  • Surgical Skills
  • Medical Ethics
  • Medical Statistics and Methodology
  • Browse content in Neurology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Neuropathology
  • Nursing Studies
  • Browse content in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Gynaecology
  • Occupational Medicine
  • Ophthalmology
  • Otolaryngology (ENT)
  • Browse content in Paediatrics
  • Neonatology
  • Browse content in Pathology
  • Chemical Pathology
  • Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
  • Histopathology
  • Medical Microbiology and Virology
  • Patient Education and Information
  • Browse content in Pharmacology
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Browse content in Popular Health
  • Caring for Others
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • Self-help and Personal Development
  • Browse content in Preclinical Medicine
  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology and Genetics
  • Reproduction, Growth and Development
  • Primary Care
  • Professional Development in Medicine
  • Browse content in Psychiatry
  • Addiction Medicine
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Learning Disabilities
  • Old Age Psychiatry
  • Psychotherapy
  • Browse content in Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Browse content in Radiology
  • Clinical Radiology
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Browse content in Surgery
  • Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • Gastro-intestinal and Colorectal Surgery
  • General Surgery
  • Neurosurgery
  • Paediatric Surgery
  • Peri-operative Care
  • Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Transplant Surgery
  • Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Browse content in Science and Mathematics
  • Browse content in Biological Sciences
  • Aquatic Biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology and Conservation
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Microbiology
  • Molecular and Cell Biology
  • Natural History
  • Plant Sciences and Forestry
  • Research Methods in Life Sciences
  • Structural Biology
  • Systems Biology
  • Zoology and Animal Sciences
  • Browse content in Chemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Crystallography
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Industrial Chemistry
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Medicinal Chemistry
  • Mineralogy and Gems
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Chemistry
  • Polymer Chemistry
  • Study and Communication Skills in Chemistry
  • Theoretical Chemistry
  • Browse content in Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Architecture and Logic Design
  • Game Studies
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Mathematical Theory of Computation
  • Programming Languages
  • Software Engineering
  • Systems Analysis and Design
  • Virtual Reality
  • Browse content in Computing
  • Business Applications
  • Computer Security
  • Computer Games
  • Computer Networking and Communications
  • Digital Lifestyle
  • Graphical and Digital Media Applications
  • Operating Systems
  • Browse content in Earth Sciences and Geography
  • Atmospheric Sciences
  • Environmental Geography
  • Geology and the Lithosphere
  • Maps and Map-making
  • Meteorology and Climatology
  • Oceanography and Hydrology
  • Palaeontology
  • Physical Geography and Topography
  • Regional Geography
  • Soil Science
  • Urban Geography
  • Browse content in Engineering and Technology
  • Agriculture and Farming
  • Biological Engineering
  • Civil Engineering, Surveying, and Building
  • Electronics and Communications Engineering
  • Energy Technology
  • Engineering (General)
  • Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology
  • History of Engineering and Technology
  • Mechanical Engineering and Materials
  • Technology of Industrial Chemistry
  • Transport Technology and Trades
  • Browse content in Environmental Science
  • Applied Ecology (Environmental Science)
  • Conservation of the Environment (Environmental Science)
  • Environmental Sustainability
  • Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Environmental Science)
  • Management of Land and Natural Resources (Environmental Science)
  • Natural Disasters (Environmental Science)
  • Nuclear Issues (Environmental Science)
  • Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Environmental Science)
  • Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Environmental Science)
  • History of Science and Technology
  • Browse content in Materials Science
  • Ceramics and Glasses
  • Composite Materials
  • Metals, Alloying, and Corrosion
  • Nanotechnology
  • Browse content in Mathematics
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Biomathematics and Statistics
  • History of Mathematics
  • Mathematical Education
  • Mathematical Finance
  • Mathematical Analysis
  • Numerical and Computational Mathematics
  • Probability and Statistics
  • Pure Mathematics
  • Browse content in Neuroscience
  • Cognition and Behavioural Neuroscience
  • Development of the Nervous System
  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • History of Neuroscience
  • Invertebrate Neurobiology
  • Molecular and Cellular Systems
  • Neuroendocrinology and Autonomic Nervous System
  • Neuroscientific Techniques
  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Browse content in Physics
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
  • Biological and Medical Physics
  • Classical Mechanics
  • Computational Physics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Electromagnetism, Optics, and Acoustics
  • History of Physics
  • Mathematical and Statistical Physics
  • Measurement Science
  • Nuclear Physics
  • Particles and Fields
  • Plasma Physics
  • Quantum Physics
  • Relativity and Gravitation
  • Semiconductor and Mesoscopic Physics
  • Browse content in Psychology
  • Affective Sciences
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Criminal and Forensic Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Health Psychology
  • History and Systems in Psychology
  • Music Psychology
  • Neuropsychology
  • Organizational Psychology
  • Psychological Assessment and Testing
  • Psychology of Human-Technology Interaction
  • Psychology Professional Development and Training
  • Research Methods in Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Browse content in Social Sciences
  • Browse content in Anthropology
  • Anthropology of Religion
  • Human Evolution
  • Medical Anthropology
  • Physical Anthropology
  • Regional Anthropology
  • Social and Cultural Anthropology
  • Theory and Practice of Anthropology
  • Browse content in Business and Management
  • Business Strategy
  • Business Ethics
  • Business History
  • Business and Government
  • Business and Technology
  • Business and the Environment
  • Comparative Management
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Health Management
  • Human Resource Management
  • Industrial and Employment Relations
  • Industry Studies
  • Information and Communication Technologies
  • International Business
  • Knowledge Management
  • Management and Management Techniques
  • Operations Management
  • Organizational Theory and Behaviour
  • Pensions and Pension Management
  • Public and Nonprofit Management
  • Social Issues in Business and Management
  • Strategic Management
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Browse content in Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • Criminal Justice
  • Criminology
  • Forms of Crime
  • International and Comparative Criminology
  • Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
  • Development Studies
  • Browse content in Economics
  • Agricultural, Environmental, and Natural Resource Economics
  • Asian Economics
  • Behavioural Finance
  • Behavioural Economics and Neuroeconomics
  • Econometrics and Mathematical Economics
  • Economic Systems
  • Economic History
  • Economic Methodology
  • Economic Development and Growth
  • Financial Markets
  • Financial Institutions and Services
  • General Economics and Teaching
  • Health, Education, and Welfare
  • History of Economic Thought
  • International Economics
  • Labour and Demographic Economics
  • Law and Economics
  • Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
  • Microeconomics
  • Public Economics
  • Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
  • Welfare Economics
  • Browse content in Education
  • Adult Education and Continuous Learning
  • Care and Counselling of Students
  • Early Childhood and Elementary Education
  • Educational Equipment and Technology
  • Educational Strategies and Policy
  • Higher and Further Education
  • Organization and Management of Education
  • Philosophy and Theory of Education
  • Schools Studies
  • Secondary Education
  • Teaching of a Specific Subject
  • Teaching of Specific Groups and Special Educational Needs
  • Teaching Skills and Techniques
  • Browse content in Environment
  • Applied Ecology (Social Science)
  • Climate Change
  • Conservation of the Environment (Social Science)
  • Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Social Science)
  • Management of Land and Natural Resources (Social Science)
  • Natural Disasters (Environment)
  • Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Social Science)
  • Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Social Science)
  • Sustainability
  • Browse content in Human Geography
  • Cultural Geography
  • Economic Geography
  • Political Geography
  • Browse content in Interdisciplinary Studies
  • Communication Studies
  • Museums, Libraries, and Information Sciences
  • Browse content in Politics
  • African Politics
  • Asian Politics
  • Chinese Politics
  • Comparative Politics
  • Conflict Politics
  • Elections and Electoral Studies
  • Environmental Politics
  • Ethnic Politics
  • European Union
  • Foreign Policy
  • Gender and Politics
  • Human Rights and Politics
  • Indian Politics
  • International Relations
  • International Organization (Politics)
  • Irish Politics
  • Latin American Politics
  • Middle Eastern Politics
  • Political Methodology
  • Political Communication
  • Political Philosophy
  • Political Sociology
  • Political Behaviour
  • Political Economy
  • Political Institutions
  • Political Theory
  • Politics and Law
  • Politics of Development
  • Public Administration
  • Public Policy
  • Qualitative Political Methodology
  • Quantitative Political Methodology
  • Regional Political Studies
  • Russian Politics
  • Security Studies
  • State and Local Government
  • UK Politics
  • US Politics
  • Browse content in Regional and Area Studies
  • African Studies
  • Asian Studies
  • East Asian Studies
  • Japanese Studies
  • Latin American Studies
  • Middle Eastern Studies
  • Native American Studies
  • Scottish Studies
  • Browse content in Research and Information
  • Research Methods
  • Browse content in Social Work
  • Addictions and Substance Misuse
  • Adoption and Fostering
  • Care of the Elderly
  • Child and Adolescent Social Work
  • Couple and Family Social Work
  • Direct Practice and Clinical Social Work
  • Emergency Services
  • Human Behaviour and the Social Environment
  • International and Global Issues in Social Work
  • Mental and Behavioural Health
  • Social Justice and Human Rights
  • Social Policy and Advocacy
  • Social Work and Crime and Justice
  • Social Work Macro Practice
  • Social Work Practice Settings
  • Social Work Research and Evidence-based Practice
  • Welfare and Benefit Systems
  • Browse content in Sociology
  • Childhood Studies
  • Community Development
  • Comparative and Historical Sociology
  • Disability Studies
  • Economic Sociology
  • Gender and Sexuality
  • Gerontology and Ageing
  • Health, Illness, and Medicine
  • Marriage and the Family
  • Migration Studies
  • Occupations, Professions, and Work
  • Organizations
  • Population and Demography
  • Race and Ethnicity
  • Social Theory
  • Social Movements and Social Change
  • Social Research and Statistics
  • Social Stratification, Inequality, and Mobility
  • Sociology of Religion
  • Sociology of Education
  • Sport and Leisure
  • Urban and Rural Studies
  • Browse content in Warfare and Defence
  • Defence Strategy, Planning, and Research
  • Land Forces and Warfare
  • Military Administration
  • Military Life and Institutions
  • Naval Forces and Warfare
  • Other Warfare and Defence Issues
  • Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution
  • Weapons and Equipment

Oxford Handbook of Mental Health Nursing (2 edn)

  • < Previous chapter
  • Next chapter >

Oxford Handbook of Mental Health Nursing (2 edn)

12 Leadership

  • Published: October 2015
  • Cite Icon Cite
  • Permissions Icon Permissions

Mental health nursing should inspire, support, and create the conditions under which people will flourish. To improve patient experience and sustain recovery-based outcomes, nurses must collaborate with other healthcare professionals, work alongside managers to support operational systems, and work in partnership with service users and their carers and families. This chapter provides a rationale for and summary of transformational leadership and how to develop, lead, and manage effective teams. It also describes two examples of inspirational leaders, reviews teamworking, and provides an overview of the different team and care settings in which mental health nurses work, including the acute psychiatric ward, the community mental health team, collaborative care, multi-agency working, and working with advocacy services. In addition, it discusses clinical supervision, management supervision, and personal development and appraisal.

Personal account

  • Sign in with email/username & password
  • Get email alerts
  • Save searches
  • Purchase content
  • Activate your purchase/trial code
  • Add your ORCID iD

Institutional access

Sign in with a library card.

  • Sign in with username/password
  • Recommend to your librarian
  • Institutional account management
  • Get help with access

Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:

IP based access

Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.

Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.

  • Click Sign in through your institution.
  • Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
  • When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
  • Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.

Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.

Society Members

Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:

Sign in through society site

Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:

  • Click Sign in through society site.
  • When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.

If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.

Sign in using a personal account

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.

A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.

Viewing your signed in accounts

Click the account icon in the top right to:

  • View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
  • View the institutional accounts that are providing access.

Signed in but can't access content

Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.

For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.

Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.

Month: Total Views:
October 2022 6
December 2022 1
January 2023 5
February 2023 3
May 2023 2
June 2023 1
September 2023 3
February 2024 3
March 2024 2
April 2024 3
June 2024 1
July 2024 3
  • About Oxford Academic
  • Publish journals with us
  • University press partners
  • What we publish
  • New features  
  • Open access
  • Rights and permissions
  • Accessibility
  • Advertising
  • Media enquiries
  • Oxford University Press
  • Oxford Languages
  • University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

  • Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
  • Cookie settings
  • Cookie policy
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

The role of the mental health nursing leadership

Wiley

  • 18(4):463-71

Anne Lise Holm at Høgskulen på Vestlandet

  • Høgskulen på Vestlandet

Elisabeth Severinsson at University of South-Eastern Norway

  • University of South-Eastern Norway

Abstract and Figures

The role of the nursing leader in mental health

Discover the world's research

  • 25+ million members
  • 160+ million publication pages
  • 2.3+ billion citations

Ingredy Nayara Chiacchio Silva

  • Monique Santos Santana

José Luís Guedes dos Santos

  • Ingredy Nayara Chiacchio Silva
  • Masri Desy Suzanna Lumban Tobing
  • Emiliana Tarigan
  • Indriati Kusumaningsih

Kajsa Sundberg

  • sandra jäggle

Dirk Richter

  • Geraldine Davis

Nicholas Procter

  • Anne Storey
  • Robert Hogan
  • Gordon J. Curphy
  • Joyce Hogan

Marie Berg

  • Ray Higgins
  • Y.S. Lincoln
  • Bernice West

Michael H Lyon

  • Donna Ciliska

Gordon H Guyatt

  • Recruit researchers
  • Join for free
  • Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Log in using your username and password

  • Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Topic Collection
  • BMJ Journals

You are here

  • Volume 7, Issue 3
  • Attributes, skills and actions of clinical leadership in nursing as reported by hospital nurses: a cross-sectional study
  • Article Text
  • Article info
  • Citation Tools
  • Rapid Responses
  • Article metrics

Download PDF

  • http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8401-4976 Majd T Mrayyan 1 ,
  • http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-3022 Abdullah Algunmeeyn 2 ,
  • http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2639-9991 Hamzeh Y Abunab 3 ,
  • Ola A Kutah 2 ,
  • Imad Alfayoumi 3 ,
  • Abdallah Abu Khait 1
  • 1 Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing , The Hashemite University , Zarqa , Jordan
  • 2 Advanced Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing , Isra University , Amman , Jordan
  • 3 Basic Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing , Isra University , Amman , Jordan
  • Correspondence to Dr Majd T Mrayyan, Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan; mmrayyan{at}hu.edu.jo

Background Research shows a significant growth in clinical leadership from a nursing perspective; however, clinical leadership is still misunderstood in all clinical environments. Until now, clinical leaders were rarely seen in hospitals’ top management and leadership roles.

Purpose This study surveyed the attributes and skills of clinical nursing leadership and the actions that effective clinical nursing leaders can do.

Methods In 2020, a cross-sectional design was used in the current study using an online survey, with a non-random purposive sample of 296 registered nurses from teaching, public and private hospitals and areas of work in Jordan, yielding a 66% response rate. Data were analysed using descriptive analysis of frequency and central tendency measures, and comparisons were performed using independent t-tests.

Results The sample consists mostly of junior nurses. The ‘most common’ attributes associated with clinical nursing leadership were effective communication, clinical competence, approachability, role model and support. The ‘least common’ attribute associated with clinical nursing leadership was ‘controlling’. The top-rated skills of clinical leaders were having a strong moral character, knowing right and wrong and acting appropriately. Leading change and service improvement were clinical leaders’ top-rated actions. An independent t-test on key variables revealed substantial differences between male and female nurses regarding the actions and skills of effective clinical nursing leadership.

Conclusions The current study looked at clinical leadership in Jordan’s healthcare system, focusing on the role of gender in clinical nursing leadership. The findings advocate for clinical leadership by nurses as an essential element of value-based practice, and they influence innovation and change. As clinical leaders in various hospitals and healthcare settings, more empirical work is needed to build on clinical nursing in general and the attributes, skills and actions of clinical nursing leadership of nursing leaders and nurses.

  • clinical leadership
  • health system
  • leadership assessment

Data availability statement

Data are available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/data-sharing/share-your-data/data-availability-statements/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .

https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2022-000672

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

Clinical leadership was limited to service managers; however, currently, all clinicians are invited to participate in leadership practices. Clinical leaders are needed in various healthcare settings to produce positive outcomes.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

This study outlined clinical leadership attributes, skills and actions to understand clinical nursing leadership better. The current study highlighted the role of gender in clinical nursing leadership, and it asserts that effective clinical nursing leadership is warranted to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of care. The results call for nurses’ clinical leadership as essential in today’s turbulent work environment.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

Nurses and clinical leaders need additional attributes, skills and actions. Clinical nursing leaders should use innovative interventions and have skills or actions to manage current work environments. Further work is needed to build on clinical nursing in general and the attributes, skills and actions of clinical nursing leadership. Clinical leadership programmes must be integrated into the nursing curricula.

Introduction

Clinical leadership is a matter of global importance. Currently, all clinicians are invited to participate in leadership practices. 1 This invitation is based on the fact that people deliver healthcare within complex systems. Effective clinicians must understand systems of care to function effectively. 1 2 Engaging in clinical leadership is an obligation, not a choice, for all clinicians at all levels. This obligation is more critical in nursing with many e merging global health issues , 2 such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

The systematic literature review of Cummings et al 3 shows the differences in leadership literature. In early 2000, clinical leadership emerged in scientific literature. 4 It is about having the knowledge, skills and competencies needed to effectively balance the needs of patients and team members within resource constraints. 4 Clinical leadership is vital in nursing as nurses face complex challenges in clinical settings, especially in acute care settings. 4 Although developed from the management domain, leadership and management are two concepts used interchangeably, 5–9 leading to further misunderstanding of the relationship between clinical leadership and management. While different types of leadership have been evident in nursing and health industry literature, clinical leadership is still misunderstood in clinical environments. 8 Clinical leadership is not fully understood among health professionals trained to care for patients, as clinical leadership is a management concept, leaving the concept open to different interpretations. 10 For example, Gauld 10 reported that clinical leaders might be professionals (such as doctors and nurses) who are no longer clinically active, mandating that clinical leaders should also be involved in delivering care. 10

There is no clear definition of ‘clinical leadership’. However, effective clinical leadership involves individuals with the appropriate clinical leadership skills and attributes at different levels of an organisation, focusing on multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary work. 10 The main skills associated with clinical leadership were having values and beliefs consistent with their actions and interventions, being supportive of colleagues, communicating effectively, serving as a role model and engaging in reflective practice. 4–9 The main attributes associated with clinical leadership were using effective communication, clinical competence, being a role model, supportive and approachability. 4–9 Stanley and colleagues reported that clinical leaders are found across health organisations and are presented in all clinical environments. Clinical leaders are often found at the highest level for clinical interaction but not commonly found at the highest management level in wards or units. 4–9

With the increasing urgency to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of care, effective nursing leadership is warranted. 4 11–17 Clinical leaders can be found in various healthcare settings, 4 most often at the highest clinical level, but they are uncommon at the top executive level. 6–9 18–24 In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) 25 empowers clinicians and front-line staff to build their decision-making capabilities, which is required for clinical leadership. This empowerment encourages a broader practice of clinical leadership without being limited to top executives alone. 25 26

Purpose and significance

This study assesses clinical nursing leadership in Jordan. More specifically, it answers the following research questions: (1) What attributes are associated with clinical nursing leadership in Jordanian hospitals? (2) What skills are important for effective clinical nursing leadership? (3) What actions are important for effective clinical nursing leadership? (4) What are the differences in skills critical to effective clinical nursing leadership based on the sample’s characteristics? (5) What are the differences in effective clinical nursing leaders’ actions based on the sample’s characteristics?

Nursing leadership studies are abundant; however, clinical leadership research is not well established. 8 27 Until fairly recently, clinical leadership in nursing has tended to focus on nursing leaders in senior leadership positions, ignoring nurse managers in clinical positions. 8 There has been significant growth in research exploring clinical leadership from a nursing perspective. 4 8 9 14–17 24 26–32 A new leadership theory, ‘congruent leadership’, has emerged, claiming that clinical leaders acted on their values and beliefs about care and thus were followed. 6–9 20 This study is the first in Jordan’s nursing and health-related research about clinical leadership. Clarifying this concept from nurses’ perspectives will support greater healthcare delivery efficiencies.

Search methods

The initial search was done using ‘clinical nursing leadership’ at the Clarivate database and Google Scholar database from 2017 to 2021, yielded 35 studies, of which, after abstracting, 14 studies were selected. However, Stanley’s work (12 studies), including those before 2017, was included because we followed the researcher’s passion and methodology of studying clinical leadership; also, some classical models of clinical leadership because they were essential for the conceptualisation of the study as well as the discussion, such as the NHS Leadership Academy (three studies; ref 25 33 34 ).

Another search was run using the words ‘attributes’, ‘skills’ or ‘actions’ using the same time frame; most of the yielded studies were not relevant, this search year was expanded to 2013–2021 because the years 2013–2015 were the glorious time of studying these concepts. Using ‘clinical leadership’ rather than ‘leadership studies’, 15 studies were yielded; however, Stanley’s above work was excluded to avoid repetition, resulting in using three studies (ref 29 30 35 ). A relevant reference of 2022 similar to our study (ref 36 ) was added at the stages of revisions. The remaining 16 of 49 references were related to the methodology and explanation of some results, such as those related to gender differences in leadership. The following limits were set: the language was English; and the year of publication was basically the last 5 years to ensure that the search was current.

Clinical leadership

Clinical leadership ensures quality patient care by providing safe and efficient care and creating a healthy clinical work environment. 4 10–17 27 31 32 It also decreases the high costs of clinical litigation settlements and improves the safety of service delivery to consumers. 4 11–17 32 For these reasons, healthcare organisations should initiate interventions to develop clinical leadership among front-line clinicians, including nurses. 8 9

Literature was scarce on clinical leadership in nursing. 4 8–10 14–17 27 28 31 Stanley and Stanley 8 defined clinical leadership as developing a culture and leading a set of tasks to improve the quality and safety of service delivery to consumers.

Clinical leadership is about focusing on direct patient care, delivering high-quality direct patient care, motivating members of the team to provide effective, safe and satisfying care, promoting staff retention, providing organisational support and improving patient outcomes. 31 Clinical leadership roles include providing the vision, setting the direction, promoting professionalism, teamwork, interprofessional collaborations, good practice and continued medical education, contributing to patient care and performing tasks effectively. 31 Moreover, the researchers added that clinical leadership is having the approachability and the ability to communicate effectively, the ability to gain support and influence others, role modelling, visibility and availability to support, the ability to promote change, advise and guide. 31 Clinical leadership competencies include demonstrating clinical expertise, remaining clinically focused and engaged and comprehending clinical leadership roles and decision-making. In addition, clinical leadership was not associated with a position within the management and organisational structure, unlike health service management. 31 33

Clinical leadership is hindered by many barriers that include the lack of time and the high clinical/client demand on their time. 8 9 Clinical leadership is limited because of the deficit in intrapersonal and interpersonal capabilities among team members and interdisciplinary and organisational factors, such as a lack of influence in interdisciplinary care planning and policy. 37 Other barriers include limited organisational leadership opportunities, the perceived need for leadership development before serving in leadership roles and a lack of funding for advancement. 38

This paper aligns with the theory of congruent leadership proposed by Stanley. 19 This theory is best suited for understanding clinical leadership because it defines leadership as a congruence between the activities and actions of the leader and the leader’s values, beliefs and principles, and those of the organisation and team.

Attributes of clinical leadership

The clinical leadership attributes needed for nurses 8 28 to perform their roles effectively are: (1) personal attributes: nurses are confident in their abilities to provide best practice, communicate effectively and have emotional intelligence; (2) team attributes: encouraging trust and commitment to others, team focus and valuing others’ skills and expertise; and (3) capabilities: encouraging contribution from others, building and maintaining relationships, creating clear direction and being a role model. 8 28 Clinical leadership attributes are linked to communicating effectively, role modelling, promoting change, providing advice and guidance, gaining support and influencing others. 28–30 Other attributes to include are clinical leaders’ engagement in reflective practice, 29 provision of the vision; setting direction, having the resources to perform tasks effectively and promoting professionalism, teamwork, interprofessional collaborations, effective practice and continued education. 27 28 31

Skills of clinical leadership

Clinical leadership skills include (1) a ‘clinical focus’: being expert knowledge, providing evidence-based rationale and systematic thinking, understanding clinical leadership, understanding clinical decision-making, being clinically focused, remaining clinically engaged and demonstrating clinical expertise; (2) a ‘follower/team focus’: being supportive of colleagues, effectively communicating communication skills, serving as a role model and empowering the team; and (3) a ‘personal qualities focus’: engaging in reflective practice, initiating change and challenging the status quo. 17 30 32 Clinical leaders have advocacy skills, facilitate and maintain healthier workplaces by driving changes in cultural issues among all health professionals. 17 29 Moreover, the overlap between the attributes and skills of clinical leaders includes being credible to colleagues because of clinical competence and the skills and capacity to support multidisciplinary teams effectively. 17 29 32

Actions of clinical leadership

A clinical leader is anyone in a clinical position exercising leadership. 26 The clinical leader’s role is to continuously instil in clinicians the capability to improve healthcare on small and large scales. 26 Furthermore, Stanley et al 9 demonstrated that clinical leaders are not always managers or higher-ups in organisations. Clinical leaders act following their values and beliefs, are approachable and provide superior service to their clients. 9 Clinical leaders define and delegate safety and quality responsibilities and roles. 14 32 39 They also ensure safety and quality of care, manage the operation of the clinical governance system, implement strategic plans and implement the organisation’s safety culture. 14 32 39 The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care 39 also reported that clinical leaders might support other clinicians by reviewing safety and quality performance data, supervising the clinical workforce, conducting performance appraisals and ensuring that the team understands the clinical governance system.

In summary, clinical leadership attributes, skills and actions were outlined to understand clinical nursing leadership. The literature shows limited nursing research on clinical leadership, calling for clinical leadership that paves the road for nurses in the current turbulent work environment.

Study design

A descriptive quantitative analysis was developed to collect data about the attributes and skills of clinical nursing leadership and the actions that effective nursing clinical leaders can take. A cross-sectional design was employed to measure clinical leadership using an online survey in 2020. This design was appropriate for such a study as it allows the researchers to measure the outcome and the exposures of the study participants at the same time. 40

Sample and settings

The general population was registered nurses in medical centres in Jordan. The target population was registered nurses in teaching, public and private hospitals. Most nurses in Jordan are females working at different shifts on a full-time basis in different types of healthcare services. The baccalaureate degree is the minimum entry into the clinical practice of registered nurses. As previous nurses, we would like to attest that nurses in Jordanian hospitals commonly use team nursing care delivery models with different decision-making styles. The size of the sample was calculated by using Thorndike’s rule as follows: N≥10(k)+50 (where N was the sample size, k is the number of independent variables) (attributes, skills, actions), the minimum sample size should be 80 participants. 40 From experience, the researcher considers the sample’s demographics and subscales as independent variables (k=17); the overall sample should not be less than 220.

Research participants were recruited through a ‘direct recruitment strategy’ from the hospitals where the nursing students were trained. A survey was used to collect data using non-random purposive sampling; of possible 450 Jordanian nurses, 296 were recruited from different types of hospitals: teaching (51 of possible 120 nurses), public (180 of possible 210 nurses) and private (65 of possible 120 nurses), with a response rate of 66%, which is adequate for an online survey. The inclusion criteria were that nurses should work in hospital settings, and any nurses who work in non-hospital settings were excluded. No incentives were applied.

Using a direct measurement method, Stanley’s Clinical Leadership Scale ( online supplemental file 1 ) was used to collect the data using the English version of the scale because English is the official education language of nursing in Jordan. 8 9 The original questionnaire consists of 24 questions: 12 quantitative and qualitative questions relevant to clinical leadership, and 12 related to the sample’s demographics. Several studies about clinical leadership among nurses and paramedics in the UK and Australia used modified versions of a survey tool 5 8 9 18–24 ; construct validity was ensured using exploratory factor analysis or triangulation of validation. Cronbach’s alpha measures the homogeneity in the survey, and it was reported to be 0.87 8 9 and 0.88 in the current study.

Supplemental material

Several questions were measured on a 5-point Likert scale in the original scale, and others were qualitative. The survey for the current study consists of 12 quantitative and qualitative questions related to clinical leadership and 14 questions related to the sample’s demographics. However, the qualitative data obtained were scattered and incomplete; thus, only the quantitative questions were analysed and reported, and another qualitative study about clinical leadership was planned. For the current study, three quantitative questions only focused on clinical leadership, leadership skills and the actions of clinical leaders, and 14 questions focused on the sample’s characteristics relevant to the Jordanian healthcare system developed by the first author. The sample characteristics were gender, marital status, shift worked, time commitment, level of education, age, years of experience in nursing, years of experience in leadership and the number of employees directly supervised. Other characteristics include the type of unit/ward, model of nursing care, ward/unit’s decision-making style, formal leadership-related education (yes/no) and formal management-related education (yes/no). Before data collection, permission to use the tool was granted.

Ethical considerations

Nurses were invited to answer the survey while assuring the voluntary nature of their participation. The participants were told that their participation in the survey was their consent form. Participants’ anonymity and confidentiality of information were assured; all questionnaires were numerically coded, and the overall results were shared with nursing and hospital administrators. 40

Patient and public involvement

There was no patient or public involvement in this research’s design, conduct, reporting or dissemination.

Data collection procedures

After a pilot study on 12 December 2020, which checked for the suitability of the questionnaire for the Jordanian healthcare settings, data were collected over a month on 23 December 2020. Data were collected through Google Forms; the survey was posted on various WhatsApp groups and Facebook pages. Using purposive snowball sampling, nurses were asked to invite their contacts and to submit the survey once. To assure one submission, the Google Forms was designed to allow for one submission only.

No problem was encountered during data collection. The two attrition prevention techniques used were effective communication and asserting to the participants that the study was relevant to them.

The researchers controlled for all possible extraneous and confounding variables by including them in the study. A possible non-accounted extraneous variable is the organisational structure; a centralised organisational structure may hinder the use of clinical nursing leadership.

Data analyses

After data cleaning and checking wild codes and outliers, all coded variables were entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (V.25), 35 which was used to generate statistics according to the level of measurement. A descriptive analysis focused on frequency and central tendency measures. 40 Part 1 of the scale comprises 54 qualities or characteristics to answer the first research question. Responses related to skills were measured on a 1–5 Likert scale; thus, means and SDs were reported to answer the second research question. Eight actions were rated on a 1–5 Likert scale; thus, means and SDs were reported to answer the third research question. Independent t-tests using all sample characteristics were performed to answer the fourth and fifth research questions.

The preanalysis phase of data analysis was performed; data were eligible and complete as few missing data were found; thus, they were left without intervention. The assumption of normality was met; both samples are approximately normally distributed, and there were no extreme differences in the sample’s SDs.

Characteristics of the sample

There were 296 nurses in the current study from different types of hospitals: teaching (51 nurses), public (180 nurses) and private (65 nurses), with a response rate of 66%. Most nurses were females (209, 70.6%), single (87, 29.4%), working a day shift (143, 48.3%) or rotating shifts (92, 31.1%), on a full-time basis (218, 73.6%), with a baccalaureate degree (236, 79.7%), aged less than 25 years (229, 77.4%) and 25–34 years (45, 15.2%), respectively. Also, 65.1% (166) of nurses reported having less than 1 year of experience in nursing; thus, they have few nurses under them to supervise (145, 49% supervise one to two nurses), and 23.3% (69) of nurses reported having 1–9 years of experience in leadership. Nurses reported that their unit or ward has a primary (81, 27.4%) or team nursing care delivery model (162, 54.7%), with a mixed (94, 31.8%) or participatory decision-making style (113, 38.2%), and had formal leadership-related education (191, 64.5%), and had no formal management-related education (210, 70.9%) ( table 1 ).

  • View inline

Sample’s characteristics (N=296*)

Attributes of clinical nursing leadership

Nurses were asked to think about the attributes and features of clinical leadership. Based on Stanley’s Clinical Leadership Scale, 8 9 nurses were given a list of 54 qualities and characteristics and asked to select the most strongly associated with clinical leadership, followed by those least strongly associated with clinical leadership. Table 2 shows the respondents’ ‘top ten’ selected qualities in ranked order.

'Most’ and ‘Least’ important attributes associated with clinical nursing leadership (N=296)

Skills of effective clinical nursing leaders

On a Likert scale of 1–5, respondents were asked to rank the skills of effective clinical leaders from ‘not relevant’ or ‘not important’ to 5=‘very relevant’ or ‘very important’. The top skills were having a strong moral character, knowing right and wrong and acting appropriately which received a high rating, with a mean of 4.17 out of 5 (0.92). Being in a management position to be effective was ranked as the least skill of an effective leader, with a mean value of 3.78 out of 5 (1.00). As indicated by respondents, other skills of effective clinical leaders are shown in table 3 .

Skills of effective clinical nursing leaders (N=296)

Actions of effective clinical nursing leaders

On a Likert scale of 1–5, respondents were asked to rank the actions of effective clinical leaders. Leading change and service management achieved a high rating of 4.07 out of 5 points (0.90). Influencing organisational policy was rated last, with a mean score of 3.95 out of 5 (1.01), which may reflect the very junior nature of the majority of the sample. As described by respondents, some of the other actions of effective leaders are shown in table 4 .

Actions effective clinical nursing leaders can do (N=296)

Significant differences in skills of effective clinical nursing leaders based on gender

Independent t-tests using all sample’s characteristics were performed to answer the fourth research question. Gender was the only characteristic variable that differentiated clinical leadership skills. An independent t-test demonstrates that males and females have distinct perspectives on 3 out of 10 items measuring clinical leadership skills. Female participants outperform male participants in terms of ‘working within the team (p value=0.021)’, ‘being visible in the clinical environment (p value=0.004)’ and ‘recognizing optimal performance and expressing appreciation promptly (p value=0.042) ( table 5 )’.

Significant differences in skills and actions of effective clinical nursing leaders based on gender (n=296)

Significant differences in actions of effective clinical nursing leaders based on gender

Independent t-tests using all sample’s characteristics were performed to answer the fifth research question. Gender was the only characteristic variable that differentiated clinical leadership actions, and it was discovered that five of the eight propositions varied in their actions: the way clinical care is administered (p=0.010); participating in staff development education (p=0.006); providing valuable staff support (p=0.033); leading change and service improvement (p=0.014); and encouraging and leading service management (p=0.019). The independent t-test results revealed that female participants scored higher in those acts, corresponding to effective leaders’ competencies. The mean values of participants’ responses to the actions of effective clinical leaders are shown in table 5 .

The characteristics of the current sample are similar to those of the structure of the task force in Jordan. The remaining question is how men in Jordan be supported in nursing to develop clinical leadership skills on par with females. Al-Motlaq et al 41 proposed using a part-time nurses policy to address nurses’ gender imbalances. Although this is necessary for both genders, we propose to develop a clinical leadership training package to promote working male nurses’ clinical leadership. In Jordan, we apply the modern trend of using leadership in nursing rather than management. About 65% of the nurses reported having formal leadership-related education, while around 71% reported no formal management-related education.

The findings clearly showed what nurses seek in a clinical leader. They appear to refer to a good communicator who values relationships and encouragement, is flexible, approachable and compassionate, can set goals and plans, resource allocation, is clinically competent and visible and has integrity. They necessitate clinical nursing leaders who can be role models for others in practice and deal with change. They should be supportive decision-makers, mentors and motivators. They should be emphatic; otherwise, they should not be in a position of control. These findings align with other research on clinical leadership. 7–9 21 Clinical leaders should be visible and participate in team activities. They should be highly skilled clinicians who instil trust and set an example, and their values should guide them in providing excellent patient care. 8 9

Participants chose other terms or functions associated with leadership roles less frequently or perceived as unrelated to clinical leadership functions. Management, creativity and vision were among the terms and functions mentioned. The absence of the word ‘visionary’ from the list of the most important characteristics suggests that traditional leadership theories, as transformational leadership and situational leadership, do not provide a solid foundation for understanding clinical leadership approaches in the clinical setting. This result can also be influenced by the junior level of the majority of the sample.

Skills of clinical nursing leadership

Numerous studies have documented the characteristics and skills of clinical leaders. 27 29 31 Clinical leaders’ skills include advocacy, facilitation and healthier workplaces. 27 29 31 Our participants were rated as having high morals (similar to other studies) 27 29 31 and worked within teams. 29 In turn, they were flexible and expressed appreciation promptly. 7–9 21 They were clinically competent; thus, they improvised and responded to various situations with appropriate skills and interventions. They recognised optimal performance, initiated interventions, led actions and procedures and had the skills and resources necessary to perform their tasks.

The lowest mean was ‘ being in a management position to be effective ’. This lowest meaning ‘ somehow ’ makes sense; all nurses can be effective leaders rather than managers, assuming effective clinical leadership roles without having management positions. 28 42

Actions of clinical nursing leadership

Influential nursing leaders are clinically competent and can initiate interventions and lead actions; these skills translate to actions. Clinical leaders are qualified to lead and manage the service improvement change (similar to Major). 42 This role will not suddenly happen; it requires clinical nursing leaders who encourage and participate in staff development education (consistent with Major). 42 This is an essential milestone and an example of providing valuable staff support. As these were the lowest reported actions, clinical nursing leaders should initiate and lead improvement initiatives in their clinical settings, 42 resulting in service improvement. They also have to influence evidence-based policies to improve work–life integration 43 and enhance patients, nurses and organisational outcomes. These outcomes include quality of care, nurses’ empowerment, job satisfaction, quality of life and work engagement. 4 11–17 32

Female nurses had more clinical leadership skills. Because the findings of this study have never been reported in the previous clinical leadership research literature, they are considered novel. This finding indicates that one possible explanation is that the overwhelming majority of respondents were females, with the proportion of females in favour (70.6%) exceeding that of males (29.4%). Furthermore, the current findings could be explained because the study was conducted in Jordan, a traditionally female-dominated gender nursing career.

This study discovered that there are gender differences in the characteristics of nurses and their clinical leadership skills, with female clinical nursing leaders scoring higher on the t-test than male clinical nursing leaders in the following areas: this is contrary to Masanotti et al , 43 who reported that male nurses have a greater sense of coherence and, in turn, more teamwork than female nurses, who commonly have job dissatisfaction and less teamwork. These could apply to female clinical nursing leaders. These female nurses had more ‘visibility in the clinical environment’, as expected in female-dominated gender nursing careers. As they were commonly dissatisfied as nurses, 43 clinical nursing leaders would be competent in caring for their nurses’ psychological status. These leaders know that even ‘thank you’ is the simplest way to show appreciation and recognition; however, this should be given promptly.

In Arab and developing countries, the perception that females have more skills with effective clinical leadership characteristics than males is consistent with Alghamdi et al 44 and Yaseen. 45 They found that females outperform males on leadership scales, which may also apply to clinical leadership. This study shows consistency between female and male clinical nursing leaders’ general perceptions of clinical leadership skills in female-dominated gender nursing careers but not in male-dominated, gender-segregated countries, including Jordan.

Female nurses had more clinical leadership actions, which differed in five out of eight actions. Female clinical nursing leaders were better at impacting clinical care delivery, participating in staff development education, providing valuable staff support, leading change and improving service.

It is aware that the nursing profession has a difficult context in some Arab and developing countries. For example, a study conducted in Saudi Arabia could explain the current findings that male nurses face various challenges, including a lack of respect and discrimination, resulting in fewer opportunities for professional growth and development. 46 The researchers reported that female clinical nursing leaders are preferred over male nurses because nursing is a nurturing and caring profession; it has been dubbed a ‘female profession’. 46 Additionally, this study corroborates a study that found many males avoid the nursing profession entirely due to its negative connotations 47 ; the profession is geared towards females. These and other stereotypes have influenced male nurses to pursue masculine nursing roles.

The study’s findings are unique because they have never been published in the previous clinical leadership research literature. However, these results can be explained indirectly based on non-clinical leadership literature. Consistent with Khammar et al , 48 as it is a female-dominated profession, it is apparent that female clinical nursing leaders are better at delivering clinical care. This result could also be related to female clinical nursing leaders having a better attitude towards clinical conditions and managing different conditions. 48 Female clinical nursing leaders, in turn, are better at influencing patient care and improving patient safety 36 and overall care and services. This improvement will not happen suddenly; it should be accompanied by paying more attention to providing continuous support, especially during induced change.

The current study reported that female clinical nursing leaders supported staff development and education because it is a female-oriented sample. Yet, Khammar et al 48 reported that men had more opportunities to educate themselves in nursing; this is true in a male-dominated country like Jordan. They also noted that males could communicate better during nursing duties. Regardless of gender, all of us should pay attention to our staff’s working environment and related issues, including promoting open communication, providing support, encouraging continuing education, managing change and improving the overall outcomes.

Limitations

Even though the study’s findings are intriguing, further investigation is needed to comprehend them. Because of the cross-sectional design used in the current study, we cannot establish causality. For this reason, the results should be interpreted with caution. Also, the purposive sample limits the generalisability; thus, this research should be carried out again with a broader selection of nursing candidates and clinical settings. Moreover, the sample consists mostly of nurses with minimal experience compared with nurses in other international countries such as Canada, the UK and the USA. 5 The current study also included nurses in their 40s and above, with male nurses less represented, and this causes misunderstanding of the true clinical leadership in nursing.

Implications

For practice, our sample consists of nurses with minimal experience compared with nurses in other developed counties. Our sample reported ‘influencing organizational policy’ as the last clinical leadership skill, which reflects the very junior nature of the sample. Unlike our study, in their systematic review, Guibert-Lacasa and Vázquez-Calatayud 36 reported that the profiles of the care clinical nurses’ experience usually varied, ranging from recent graduates to senior nurses. If our nurses were more experienced, it might lead to different results. More nurses’ clinical experience would increase nurses’ abilities at the bedside, especially in areas related to reasoning and problem solving. 36 More experienced nurses tend to work collaboratively within the team with greater competency and autonomy. 36 More experienced nurses would provide high-quality care, 36 resulting in patient satisfaction. To generate positive outcomes of clinical nursing leadership, such early-career nurses should be qualified. Guibert-Lacasa and Vázquez-Calatayud 36 suggested using the nursing clinical leadership programme based on the American Organization for Nursing Leadership 34 competency model, pending the presence of organisational support for such an initiative. 36

‘Most’ important clinical nursing leadership attributes should be promoted at all organisational and clinical levels. Clinical nursing leadership’s ‘least’ important attributes should be defeated to achieve better outcomes. Clinical nursing leaders should use innovative interventions and have skills or actions conducive to a healthy work environment. These interventions include being approachable to enable their staff to cope with change, 28 using open and consistent communication, 28–30 being visible and consistently available as role models and mentors and taking risks. 28 Hospital administrators must help their clinical leaders, including nursing leaders, to effectively use their authority, responsibility and accountability; clinical leadership is not only about complying with the job description. A good intervention to start with to promote the culture of clinical leadership is setting an award for the ‘ideal nursing leaders’. This award will bring innovative attributes, skills and actions.

Moreover, as they are in the front line of communication, nurses and clinical nursing leaders should be involved in policy-related matters and committees. 49 An interventional programme that gives nurses more autonomy in making decisions is warranted. In turn, various patient, nurse and organisational outcomes will be improved. 13–17 32

The study’s findings revealed statistically significant differences in the skills and actions of effective clinical leaders, with female nurses scoring higher in many skills and actions. Hence, healthcare organisations must re-evaluate current leadership and staff development policies and prioritise professional development for nurses while also introducing new modes of evaluation and assessment that are explicitly geared at improving clinical leadership among nurses, particularly males.

For education, this study outlined clinical leadership attributes, skills and actions to understand clinical nursing leadership in Jordan better. Nevertheless, nurses and clinical leaders need additional attributes, skills and actions. Consequently, undergraduate nursing students might benefit from clinical leadership programmes integrated into the academic curriculum to teach them the fundamentals of clinical leadership. A master’s degree programme in ‘Clinical Nursing Leadership’ would prepare nurses for this pioneering role and today and tomorrow’s clinical nursing leaders. However, all nurses are clinical leaders regardless of their degrees and experience. Conducting presentations, convening meetings, overseeing organisational transformation and settling disagreements are common ways to hone these abilities.

For research purposes, it is worth exploring the concept of clinical leadership from a practice nurse’s perspective to provide insight into practice nurses’ feelings and perceptions. Thus, a longitudinal quantitative design or a phenomenological qualitative design might be adopted to assess the subjective experience of the nurses involved. It is better in future research to focus on both young and veteran clinical leaders; some of our nurses were aged 45 years and above, and those nurses may not be clinically focused.

Summary and conclusion

The current study put clinical leadership into the context of the healthcare system in Jordan. This study highlighted the role of gender in clinical nursing leadership. Nurses’ clinical leadership is a milestone for influencing innovation and change. The current study identified the ‘most’ and ‘least’ important attributes, skills and actions associated with clinical leadership. However, the male and female nurses found substantial differences in effective clinical nursing leadership skills and actions. This study is unique; little is known about the collective concepts of attributes, skills and actions necessary for clinical nursing leadership.

Nurses need leadership attributes, skills and actions to influence policy development and change in their work environments. Leadership attributes can help develop programmes that give nurses more autonomy in making decisions. As a result, nurses will be more active as clinical leaders.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This study involves human participants and was approved by The Hashemite University, Jordan (IRB number: 1/1/2020/2021) on 18 October 2020. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Acknowledgments

The researchers thank the subjects who participated in the study, and Mrs Othman and Mr Sayaheen who collected the data.

  • Folaron I ,
  • Colburn JA , et al
  • Edmonson C ,
  • McCarthy C ,
  • Trent-Adams S , et al
  • Cummings GG ,
  • Tate K , et al
  • Connolly M ,
  • Stanley D ,
  • Blanchard D ,
  • Hohol A , et al
  • Cao T , et al
  • Cordeiro R ,
  • Rengel-Diaz C ,
  • Duignan M ,
  • Drennan J ,
  • McCarthy VJC
  • Tao Z , et al
  • Cuthbertson J ,
  • Metcalfe H , et al
  • Latimer K ,
  • NHS Leadership Academy
  • Loewenthal L , et al
  • Claus S , et al
  • Jackson D ,
  • Mannix J , et al
  • Siegel EO ,
  • American Organization for Nursing Leadership
  • Guibert-Lacasa C ,
  • Vázquez-Calatayud M
  • McNamara MS ,
  • Casey M , et al
  • Peltzer JN ,
  • Shen Q , et al
  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
  • Al-Motlaq M ,
  • Masanotti GM ,
  • Paolucci S ,
  • Abbafati E , et al
  • Alghamdi MG ,
  • Abdelkader MA ,
  • Abdelrahman S
  • Abushaikha L ,
  • Mahadeen A ,
  • AbdelKader R , et al
  • Khammar A ,
  • Poursadeghiyan M ,
  • Marioryad H , et al
  • Kitson AL ,
  • Gifford W , et al

Supplementary materials

Supplementary data.

This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

  • Data supplement 1

Contributors MTM developed the study conception, abstract, introduction, literature review and methods; collected the data and wrote the first draft of this research paper and the final proofreading. HAN analysed the data and wrote the results. AA wrote the discussion and updated the literature review. OK wrote the limitations, implications, and summary and conclusion. IAF and AAK did the critical revisions and the final proofreading. All authors contributed to the current work.

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests None declared.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

Leadership and management in mental health nursing

Profile image of Nina Blegen

2011, Journal of Nursing Management

Related Papers

leadership in mental health nursing essay

Journal of Nursing Management

Catriona Murphy

Nancy Purdy

Roslyn Sorensen

Aim(s) To examine nursing leadership in contemporary health care and its potential contribution to health service organization and management.Background As the nursing profession repositions itself as an equal partner in health care beside medicine and management, its enhanced nursing standards and clinical knowledge are not leading to a commensurate extension of nursing’s power and authority in the organization.Method(s) An ethnographic study of an ICU in Sydney, Australia, comprising: interviews with unit nursing managers (4); focus groups (3) with less experienced, intermediate and experienced nurses (29 in total); and interviews with senior nurse manager (1).Results Inter- and intra-professional barriers in the workplace, fragmentation of multidisciplinary clinical systems that collectively deliver care, and clinical and administrative disconnection in resolving organizational problems, prevented nurses articulating a model of intensive and end-of-life care.Conclusion(s) Professional advocacy skills are needed to overcome barriers and to articulate and operationalize new nursing knowledge and standards if nurses are to enact and embed a leadership role.Implications for nursing management The profession will need to move beyond a reliance on professional clinical models to become skilled multidisciplinary team members and professional advocates for nurses to take their place as equal partners in health care.

Majd T . Mrayyan

Kristine Rørtveit , Elisabeth Severinsson

Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing

Jouko Katajisto , Sanna Salanterä

European Journal of Pain

Goran Tomson

Charlotte Delmar

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Katri Vehviläinen-julkunen

Journal of nursing management

Sidsel Tveiten

Riitta Suhonen , Jouko Katajisto

Maria Tseroni

Journal of Advanced …

Caroline Bradbury-Jones

Nursing & Health Sciences

Arturas Razbadauskas , Tarja Suominen

Mohammed Alghamdi , Raeda Abualrub

abdullah çalışkan

Journal of nursing …

Christina Serrano

Journal of Professional Nursing

Jouko Katajisto

Eileen Vitale

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses

Patricia Bartzak

wahyuningsih lase

The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice

Louise Ward

Irene Ilott

Tarja Suominen

Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness

Kathy Murphy

Scott Lamont

sevilay kurt

International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Brenda Happell

Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

Marjorie Lloyd

Issues Educ Res

Renée Williams

Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Tarja Suominen , Natalja Istomina , Arturas Razbadauskas , One one31

Abdullah ÇALIŞKAN

Thunder cats

Journal of Clinical Nursing

julie ridley

Maija Hupli

Nursing Research and Practice

Marjo Suhonen

Nurse Education Today

Virpi Sulosaari

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association

kathleen Delaney

Berith Hedberg , Kristina Rosengren

julie ridley , Mick McKeown

Journal of Health Organization and …

Jamel Chafra , Hakan Erkutlu

Journal of Health Organization and Management

Hakan Erkutlu , Jamel Chafra

RELATED TOPICS

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • My Bibliography
  • Collections
  • Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

  • Create a new collection
  • Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in NLM Catalog
  • Add to Search

Leadership and management in mental health nursing

Affiliation.

  • 1 Centre for Women's, Family and Child Health, Vestfold University College, Tønsberg, University of Stavanger, Norway. [email protected]
  • PMID: 21569145
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01237.x

Background: Mental health nurses are agents of change, and their leadership, management role and characteristics exist at many levels in health care. Previous research presents a picture of mental health nurses as subordinate and passive recipients of the leader's influence and regard leadership and management as distinct from the nurses' practical work.

Aim: The aim was to provide a synthesis of the studies conducted and to discuss the relationship between nursing leadership and nursing management in the context of mental health nursing.

Method: A literature search was conducted using EBSCO-host, Academic Search Premier, Science Direct, CINAHL and PubMed for the period January 1995-July 2010.

Results: Leadership and management in the context of mental health nursing are human activities that imply entering into mutual relationships.

Conclusion: Mental health nurses' leadership, management and transformational leadership are positively related in terms of effectiveness and nurses' skills.

Implication for nursing management: It is important to consider mental health nurses' management as a form of leadership similar to or as a natural consequence of transformational leadership (TL) and that ethical concerns must be constantly prioritized throughout every level of the organization.

© 2011 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • The role of the mental health nursing leadership. Holm AL, Severinsson E. Holm AL, et al. J Nurs Manag. 2010 May;18(4):463-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01089.x. J Nurs Manag. 2010. PMID: 20609050 Review.
  • Providing nursing leadership in a community residential mental health setting. Hughes FA, Bamford A. Hughes FA, et al. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2011 Jul;49(7):35-42. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20110610-01. Epub 2011 Jun 29. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2011. PMID: 21702426 Review.
  • Leadership and job satisfaction among Azorean hospital nurses: an application of the situational leadership model. Furtado LC, Batista Mda G, Silva FJ. Furtado LC, et al. J Nurs Manag. 2011 Nov;19(8):1047-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01281.x. Epub 2011 Aug 10. J Nurs Manag. 2011. PMID: 22074307
  • Linking transformational leadership to nurses' extra-role performance: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement. Salanova M, Lorente L, Chambel MJ, Martínez IM. Salanova M, et al. J Adv Nurs. 2011 Oct;67(10):2256-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05652.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28. J Adv Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21535088
  • Clinical supervision and burnout: the influence of clinical supervision for community mental health nurses. Edwards D, Burnard P, Hannigan B, Cooper L, Adams J, Juggessur T, Fothergil A, Coyle D. Edwards D, et al. J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):1007-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01370.x. J Clin Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16879545
  • The influences of nursing transformational leadership style on the quality of nurses' working lives in Taiwan: a cross-sectional quantitative study. Lin PY, MacLennan S, Hunt N, Cox T. Lin PY, et al. BMC Nurs. 2015 May 14;14:33. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0082-x. eCollection 2015. BMC Nurs. 2015. PMID: 25991910 Free PMC article.

Publication types

  • Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.
  • MedlinePlus Health Information

full text provider logo

  • Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

This website is intended for healthcare professionals

British Journal of Nursing

  • { $refs.search.focus(); })" aria-controls="searchpanel" :aria-expanded="open" class="hidden lg:inline-flex justify-end text-gray-800 hover:text-primary py-2 px-4 lg:px-0 items-center text-base font-medium"> Search

Search menu

Alban-Metcalfe J, Alimo-Metcalfe B. Reliability and validity of the ‘leadership competencies and engaging leadership scale’. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2013; 26:(1)56-73 https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311294281

Avery GC. Understanding leadership: paradigms and cases.London: Sage; 2004

Avolio BJ, Waldman DA, Yammarino FJ. Leading in the 1990s: the four I's of transformational leadership. Journal of European Industrial Training. 1991; 15:(4) https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599110143366

Baker SD. Followership: the theoretical foundation of a contemporary construct. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2007; 14:(1)50-60 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002831207304343

Binci D, Cerruti C, Braganza A. Do vertical and shared leadership need each other in change management?. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 2016; 37:(5)558-578 https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2014-0166

Braun S, Peus C, Weisweiler S, Frey D. Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: a multilevel mediation model of trust. Leadership Quarterly. 2013; 24:(1)270-283 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006

Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA. Shared Leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal. 2007; 50:(5)1217-1234

Summary of key research findings from the NHS staff survey. NHS Survey Coordination Centre. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/y4ofshoy (accessed 13 March 2019)

Deinert A, Homan AC, Boer D, Voelpel SC, Gutermann D. Transformational leadership sub-dimensions and their link to leaders' personality and performance. Leadership Quarterly. 2015; 26:(6)1095-1120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.001

Report of the committee of inquiry into allegations of ill-treatment of patients and other irregularities at the Ely Hospital.Cardiff. London: HMSO; 1969

D'Innocenzo L, Mathieu JE, Kukenberger MR. A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management. 2016; 42:(7)1964-1991 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525205

Authentic leadership theory and practice: origins, effects and development. In: Gardner WL, Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO (eds). Bingley: Emerald Press; 2005

Gillespie NA, Mann L. Transformational leadership and shared values: the building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2004; 19:(6)588-607 https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410551507

Improving quality in the English NHS. A strategy for action. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/yxavguvr (accessed 13 March 2013)

Hamlin RG. A study and comparative analysis of managerial and leadership effectiveness in the National Health Service: an empirical factor analytic study within an NHS trust hospital. Health Serv Manage Res.. 2002; 15:(4)245-263 https://doi.org/10.1258/095148402320589046

Health Foundation. Transformational change in NHS providers. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/y5jryfgu (accessed 13 March 2013)

Jackson B, Parry K. A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying leadership, 2nd edn. London: Sage; 2011

Investigating collaborative leadership for communities of practice in learning and skills. 2007. https://tinyurl.com/y5uuhly9 (accessed 13 March 2019)

The King's Fund. The future of management and leadership: no more heroes. 2011. https://tinyurl.com/yakyju8b (accessed 13 March 2019)

Merkens BJ., Spencer JS. A successful and necessary evolution to shared leadership: a hospital's story. Leadership in Health Services. 1998; 11:(1)1-4

NHS Leadership Academy. Healthcare leadership model: the nine dimensions of leadership behaviour. 2013. https://tinyurl.com/ybwfg7b7 (accessed 13 March 2019)

NHS Survey Coordination Centre. NHS staff survey 2017. National briefing. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/y6tla4bw (accessed 13 March 2019)

Nicolaides VC, LaPort KA, Chen TR The shared leadership of teams: a meta-analysis of proximal, distal, and moderating relationships. The Leadership Quarterly. 2014; 25:(5)923-942

Pearce CL, Sims HP. Shared leadership: toward a multi-level theory of leadership. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams. 2000; 7:115-139

Robert LP, You S. Are you satisfied yet? Shared leadership, individual trust, autonomy, and satisfaction in virtual teams. Journal of the Association of Information Science and Technology. 2018; 69:(4)503-511

Saks AM. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2006; 21:(7)600-619

Can we never learn? Abuse, complaints and inquiries in the NHS. History and Policy. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/yypm45ae (accessed 13 March 2019)

Tsai Y, Wu S-W. The relationships between organisational citizenship behaviour, job satisfaction and turnover intention. J Clin Nurs.. 2010; 19:(23–24)3564-3574 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03375.x

Tse H, Chiu W. Transformational leadership and job performance: a social identity perspective. Journal of Business Research. 2014; 67:(1)2827-2835 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.07.018

Uhl-Bien M, Riggio R, Lowe K, Carsten M. Followership theory: a review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly. 2014; 25:(1)83-104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007

Wang XF., Howell JM. A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly. 2012; 23:(5)775-790 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.02.001

It's not about the money: staff engagement comes first. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/yxnpqhj3 (accessed 13 March 2019)

Leadership and leadership development in health care: the evidence base. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/ybsmpmwn (accessed 13 March 2019)

Zhua W, Avolio BJ, Riggio RE, Sosik JJ. The effect of authentic transformational leadership on follower and group ethics. Leadership Quarterly. 2011; 22:(5)801-817

Models of leadership and their implications for nursing practice

S'thembile Thusini

MSc Student, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London

View articles · Email S'thembile

Julia Mingay

Lecturer, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London

View articles

Leadership in today's NHS, either as a leader or follower, is everybody's business. In this article, an MSc student undertaking the Developing Professional Leadership module at King's College London describes two leadership models and considers their application to two dimensions of the NHS Healthcare Leadership Model: ‘Engaging the team’ and ‘Leading with care’. The author demonstrates the value of this knowledge to all those involved in health care with a case scenario from clinical practice and key lessons to help frontline staff in their everyday work.

The Ely inquiry into the systematic brutal treatment of patients in a Cardiff mental institution was the first formal inquiry into NHS failings ( Department of Health and Social Security, 1969 ). Since that time there have been more than 100 inquiries with inadequate leadership persistently identified as a major concern ( Sheard, 2015 ). National responses have included the NHS Healthcare Leadership Model, delivered by the NHS Leadership Academy and its partners (2013) . A range of online and face-to-face programmes aim to increase an organisation's leadership capacity by developing leaders who pay close attention to their frontline staff, understand the contexts in which they work and the situations they face and empower them to lead continuous improvements that enhance patient outcomes and safety ( NHS Leadership Academy, 2013 ).

At King's College London, ‘Developing Professional Leadership’ is a core module of the Advanced Practice (Leadership) pathway. The module critically appraises theoretical and professional perspectives on leadership and supports participants to take up leadership roles with attention to ethical practice. Both national and college leadership activities promote an understanding of vertical transformational leadership (VTL) and shared leadership (SL).

Vertical transformational leadership

VTL is a hierarchical leadership model that describes an individual leader who, through various influences and mechanisms, elevates himself or herself and followers towards self-actualisation ( Pearce and Sims, 2000 ). VTL values collaboration and consensus, integrity and justice, empowerment and optimism, accountability and equality, and honesty and trust ( Braun et al, 2013 ). A vertical transformational leader inspires others by interpreting complex data, creating a vision and formulating a strategy for its attainment ( Avery, 2004 ). They aim to create an organisation that is agile, responsive, open to learning and future ready through innovation and creativity. They do this by appealing to followers' emotions and internal motivations, and by building rewarding relationships and raising morale. They use delegation, consultation and collaboration to engage followers but retain power so that responsibility and accountability for a vision and its strategy rests with the leader ( Avery, 2004 ).

Behaviours associated with this leadership style have been classified by Avolio et al (1991) as the four ‘I's: idealised influence, individualised consideration, inspirational motivation, and intellectual stimulation:

  • ‘Idealised influence’ represents the charismatic part of VTL. Leaders model integrity, optimism and confidence, and act with courage and conviction demonstrating their intellectual and technical skills
  • ‘Individualised consideration’ requires self-awareness and an appreciation of the values, aspirations, motivations, strengths and weaknesses of others. From this perspective leaders need to be able to listen and communicate effectively, and may be called upon to teach, coach, mentor or counsel
  • ‘Inspirational motivation’ necessitates a clearly communicated vision and belief in a team's abilities to achieve a desired goal
  • Through ‘intellectual stimulation’ leaders support and facilitate independent thinking, encouraging followers to be more rational, creative and innovative in their decision-making and problem-solving.

Tse and Chiu (2014) have advised that leaders adopt a balanced approach to the use of the four Is that is contingent upon their followers' orientation. For example, if group cohesion is required then idealised influence and inspirational motivation are appropriate leader behaviours. However, if greater creativity is needed from staff, then a leader is advised to exhibit individual consideration and provide intellectual stimulation. Conversely, mismatching leadership behaviour to follower orientation can have detrimental effects. For example, providing intellectual stimulation with high expectations but offering insufficient individualised consideration.

During times of large-scale dramatic organisational change an effective vertical leader is necessary for recalibrating and reviving an organisation ( Binci et al, 2016 ). They can provide clarity, motivation and empowerment. There are several examples of positive VTL outcomes in NHS trusts that have managed to improve their Care Quality Commission ratings. This was achieved through measures to revive cultures and empower staff with open communications and active support ( Health Foundation, 2015 ). Critics argue that VTL dependence on a single figure can be futile for an organisation, especially if the individual is prone to dysfunctional behaviour ( Wang and Howell, 2012 ). In response, an ‘authentic leader’ is proposed ( Jackson and Parry, 2011 ); this is someone with a ‘high socialised power orientation’, who is humble, modest, deflects recognition for achievements, who celebrates the team, and exhibits vertical and shared leadership behaviours. Through self-awareness and reflecting on actions a VTL leader can exhibit authentic leadership behaviour.

VTL overlaps other leadership approaches including authentic, servant, charismatic, inspirational and visionary ( Avery, 2004 ). What often differentiates VTL is its motivation or focus, which is typically on achieving organisational goals. VTL is also associated with pseudo-transformational and transactional leadership. The former is a dysfunctional form of charismatic leadership, characterised by narcissistic behaviours associated with dictators and sensational political and corporate leaders. Transactional leadership is practised by positional managers whose job it is to set expectations and engage in corrective or autocratic measures that aim to maintain efficiency. Transformational leaders do utilise some transactional methods to achieve goals and the two leadership styles can be complementary. However, VTL is two-way leadership with follower influence whereas transactional leadership represents one-directional hierarchical leadership.

Shared leadership

SL is a non-hierarchical leadership model that describes leadership that emerges within a group, depending on the context and skills required at a given time ( D'Innocenzo et al, 2016 ). SL values openness and trust, engagement and inclusiveness, reciprocity and fluidity, democracy and empowerment, and networking and support ( Jameson, 2007 ). Shared leaders are peers who possess no authority over the group outside the context of their shared contribution. Individual leadership is de-emphasised and a vision and its strategy are created and owned by the group. Open discursive engagement is favoured for mutual sense making through the pooling of diverse skills, knowledge and experience. SL is dynamic, multidirectional and collaborative. Power is shared so that responsibility and accountability for a vision and its strategy rests with the group ( Avery, 2004 ).

SL is often associated with, but different conceptually from, co-leadership, distributed leadership, and self-managing teams. Carson et al (2007) suggested that these all lie on a continuum with co-leadership at one end and shared leadership at the other. Participation, consultation and delegation are used in SL as are the four Is of transformational leadership. SL has been described as a type of group transformational leadership as transformational behaviours within a shared leadership model achieve similar results to VTL ( Wang and Howell, 2012 ). SL necessarily exists in organisations such as the NHS where different professional groups with their own leadership structures need to collaborate. Transforming a culture through shared leadership requires patience and investment. It is an iterative process involving cycles of learning and reflection that require trust, personal and professional maturity, and organisational support.

SL leadership behaviours can become widespread within teams, lessening their dependence on one leader and the potential effects of rogue single leaders ( The King's Fund, 2011 ). This is vital in environments where problems are increasingly complex and leaders are required to possess multiple problem-solving skills. Cost efficiencies can result from diminishing hierarchical leaders' workloads and a consequent reduction in their posts among highly skilled cohesive groups ( Tse and Chiu, 2014 ). Critics argue that SL efficiency is influenced by group dynamics, which may be prone to relationship conflicts that lead to decision paralysis ( Pearce and Sims, 2000 ). Additionally, the emergence of a vertical leader who could manipulate the workforce for political or corporate gain may be an unintended consequence of SL.

Both VTL and SL are moderated by internal and external factors. VTL is influenced by levels of trust, follower receptiveness, personality traits, task complexity and urgency. Stress and burnout can lessen leadership benefits while trust can enhance performance outcomes ( Robert and You, 2018 ). SL is moderated by trust, time, group size and cohesion, skill mix, confidence, task complexity and interdependence ( Nicolaides et al, 2014 ). Trust, sufficient time, a balanced skill mix and group cohesion have a positive influence, while task complexity, especially at formative stages, hinders effective SL.

The two approaches are complementary. During the formative stages of shared leadership, a vertical leader is crucial to guide and sustain shared leadership. Some final decisions will need to rest with the hierarchical leader. As the team gains confidence, a vertical transformational leader's role evolves to consultant, mentor, facilitator and, at times, recipient of group leadership. A significant body of evidence associates VTL and SL with positive individual, group and organisational outcomes ( Wang and Howell, 2012 ; Nicolaides et al, 2014 ; D'Innocenzo et al, 2016 ). VTL predominantly influences individual and organisational outcomes while SL is more influential at the group and organisational levels. Table 1 summarises some of the differences between the approaches, although they share much more in common.

VTL SL
Power structure Hierarchical Non-hierarchical
Vision and strategy Responsibility of the leader Responsibility of the group
Uses Large scale or sudden changeYoung teams Ongoing development and changeMature teams
Primary benefits Individual and organisation Group and organisation
; ;

Leadership is a dynamic process involving collective values, behaviours and resources. Followers play a pivotal role in attributing and sustaining leadership. ‘Followership’ is more than just being an employee and involves characteristics and behaviours that an individual exhibits in relation to their leaders ( ). For example, being obedient and subordinate while being prepared to challenge constructively and act proactively to support problem-solving processes. In public service, the status of an individual can change from follower to leader quite regularly, requiring all to play a part. VTL and SL can support ‘engaging the team’ and ‘leading with care’, two of nine dimensions in the NHS Healthcare Leadership Model ( ). These two dimensions form the basis of the leadership model and are closely linked since engaged teams are a product of caring leadership. However, it is useful to consider them independently to understand their relationship to VTL and SL.

Currently there is an urgency to engage frontline staff and increase leadership capacity to promote patient safety and organisational development ( ). This is not new. In 1998, Merkens and Spencer deemed follower engagement and the development of shared leadership necessary for an organisation's survival. Change is now a constant feature of NHS cultures in which leaders must instigate service re-organisation and support staff through periods of flux. They need to be able to reach out to all parts of a system, to remain present and involved in change processes, and embed improvement cultures while ensuring consistently high levels of compassionate care ( ). This can be achieved only if they also champion the full engagement of their staff and other key stakeholders in improvement methodologies. Engagement is a product of trust, inspiration, motivation, empowerment and the alignment of visions and values ( ). It can be fostered through VTL or SL and use of the four Is. Team engagement is critical for promoting shared leadership ( ). Complacency must be avoided and potential barriers to engagement identified and managed.

define dengaging leadership as ‘near’ leadership: leaders who show genuine concern, honesty, consistency, accessibility and act with integrity. referred to authentic leaders who demonstrate self-awareness, accept ownership and responsibility for themselves and act with no hidden intentions or agendas. demonstrated how authentic transformational leadership enhances group ethics and develops follower moral identity and moral emotions. In turn, this can foster collective leadership because authentic leaders naturally lay a foundation of trust for others to strive toward similar ends. Collective leadership helps to distribute and disseminate change ( ). Engaged teams feel valued and empowered and their members can independently undertake additional tasks out of empathy, care and compassion for others ( ). Collective leadership reflects qualities of shared leadership. It needs to be carefully nurtured and supported by an organisation to avoid disengagement from change processes. Support, care and compassion among employees must not be overlooked.

Engaged teams can harness the negotiation, conflict resolution, problem-solving and leadership skills of individual members. Organisations become more resilient and can deal with complexity swiftly and efficiently, preventing and managing crises and sustaining organisational development by spreading transformational attributes from a single leader to the collective ( ).

A person's values and corresponding behaviours influence their leadership style more than their competencies ( ). They set the tone for an organisation's culture, whether leadership is conveyed with care or not, and therefore the ways in which staff and patients are treated. Although values are difficult to measure, their essence is detectable in an organisation's culture and in a leader's focus. Leading with care through inclusive, supportive and empowering leadership was found to be crucial by in a study of behavioural outcomes in the NHS. There are important lessons from the most recent NHS Staff Survey in these respects. Although managerial responsiveness to staff wellbeing has improved in recent years, staff engagement, including their ability to contribute to improvements and their sense of being valued by managers, has decreased slightly ( ). Supporting documentation argues that NHS trusts need to give staff the skills, freedom and responsibility necessary to improve care, enhance motivation by focusing on values of quality care for patients, and build transparency and fairness across the organisation to generate high trust cultures that empower staff to contribute to decisions that affect them ( ).

Through individual consideration, inspiration, motivation and intellectual stimulation, VTL demonstrates caring leadership attributes such as honesty, fairness, integrity and support ( ). Benefits include improved wellbeing and job satisfaction for individual staff, and enhanced group identity, cooperation and cohesion ( ). Followers are inspired to see new possible futures and the means to achieve desired outcomes with the confidence to act. The status quo is questioned, problems are reframed and creative problem-solving occurs. Engaged, intelligent followers who are ready to act through self-leadership are demonstrating characteristics of shared leadership ( ). This emphasises the complementarity and overlap of VTL and SL as active and effective followership and leadership can result from these internal and external motivations.

Although leadership models can seem quite distant and academic, nurses need to understand their implications for their professional lives, whether they are leaders or followers. The scenario in provides an example of collective or shared leadership with which the first author was involved during a clinical placement.

This quality improvement project involved six band 5 and 6 nurses who were responding to growing concerns about the psychological challenges faced by patients and their loved ones in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim was to develop ICU family diaries and a post-ICU follow-up care process. Involvement was voluntary and the group members had clinical or academic experience of ICU care. The project initiator was the coordinator of the group; however, leadership was shared among its members.

Regular meetings were held during which practice-based evidence was reviewed, a vision was discussed and a mission was collectively agreed. Tasks were democratically assigned according to people's skills and preferences with individual objectives agreed. Activity plans included stakeholder engagement strategies to secure support and buy-in from management and frontline staff, research activities to generate further evidence, the preparation of different types of diary and the planning of post-ICU follow-up processes, and devising communication strategies, teaching plans and ongoing support for ICU frontline staff, patients and relatives. The process was not linear or straightforward as people's ideas were constructively critiqued by the group. Each concern was taken as valid and examined until members were satisfied. This allowed the team to own a single idea that could be collectively developed. The team exercised flexibility in their chosen roles and provided mutual support to one another. Collective monitoring held members to account for their responsibilities although self-leadership towards task completion was evident. Familiarity and mutual respect between team members facilitated group activities.

The group successfully developed and introduced family diaries and post-ICU follow-up processes that particular leadership behaviours had made possible. Members collectively engaged in sense making, vision and strategy development, problem-solving, resource allocation and action. These shared leadership behaviours were characterised by interdependent cooperation and collective decision-making. Members' strengths naturally determined their contributions but group cohesion and trust created a positive learning climate. Ideas and assumptions were respectfully but critically challenged and members were open to new perspectives. Evidence was used to help minimise disagreements and a supportive environment was nurtured to foster innovation and exploration. Senior management had initially sought a hierarchical leader to manage this quality improvement project, which was customary in this specific clinical setting. However, the collective or shared leadership approach helped drive the project through with minimal ‘background’ managerial support. The shared leadership demonstrated in this scenario also fostered shared learning.

VTL and SL are both appropriate in healthcare contexts and can be complementary under the right circumstances. The key is being able to recognise appropriate opportunities to develop and utilise each as either a leader or follower ( Binci et al, 2016 ). Familiarity with the models, their methods and uses are important in these respects. It is equally important to recognise and engage in any cultural change that may be necessary for leadership to be effective. Transformational change does not have to be revolutionary or top-down. Minor changes at the frontline can deliver significant benefits if team members are engaged and led with care.

  • Whether you are a leader or a follower, leadership is at the heart of NHS activity and all nurses have a responsibility to ensure it is effective
  • Vertical transformational and shared leadership models are promoted by national leadership programmes that support the development of NHS staff
  • The two models are complementary, and it is important to be aware of opportunities to develop and utilise each as either a leader or follower
  • Leading with care can inspire and motivate teams to engage in transformative change
  • Familiarisation with leadership models and their application in practice is important for the development of nurses and the organisations in which they work, and for the assurance of patient safety

CPD reflective questions

  • What can you do to demonstrate leadership within your own capacity in your clinical setting?
  • Considering that ‘followership’ is an integral part of NHS leadership, what can you do to demonstrate responsible followership?
  • Reflect on a time where you demonstrated leadership or observed leadership in your clinical area; what leadership qualities can you recognise from that scenario?

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • PMC10537672

Logo of nursrep

The Impact of Transformational Leadership in the Nursing Work Environment and Patients’ Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Line miray kazin ystaas.

1 Department of Health Sciences, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 1700, Cyprus

Monica Nikitara

Savoula ghobrial, evangelos latzourakis, giannis polychronis, costas s. constantinou.

2 Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 1700, Cyprus

Associated Data

The articles’ data supporting this systematic review are from previously reported studies and datasets, which have been cited. The processed data are available in Table 2 and in the reference list. Further information can be requested from the corresponding author.

Background: With the increasingly demanding healthcare environment, patient safety issues are only becoming more complex. This urges nursing leaders to adapt and master effective leadership; particularly, transformational leadership (TFL) is shown to scientifically be the most successfully recognized leadership style in healthcare, focusing on relationship building while putting followers in power and emphasizing values and vision. Aim: To examine how transformational leadership affects nurses’ job environment and nursing care provided to the patients and patients’ outcomes. Design: A systematic literature review was conducted. From 71 reviewed, 23 studies were included (studies included questionnaire surveys and one interview, extracting barriers and facilitators, and analyzing using qualitative synthesis). Result: TFL indirectly and directly positively affects nurses’ work environment through mediators, including structural empowerment, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction. Nurses perceived that managers’ TFL behavior did not attain excellence in any of the included organizations, highlighting the necessity for additional leadership training to enhance the patient safety culture related to the non-reporting of errors and to mitigate the blame culture within the nursing environment. Conclusion: Bringing more focus to leadership education in nursing can make future nursing leaders more effective, which will cultivate efficient teamwork, a quality nursing work environment, and, ultimately, safe and efficient patient outcomes. This study was not registered.

1. Introduction

Patient harm caused by errors in healthcare is the leading origin of morbidity and mortality internationally [ 1 ]. Researchers are linking adverse patient safety outcomes to a lack of effective leadership, while relational leadership styles, like transformational leadership, continue to be associated with reduced adverse patient outcomes [ 2 , 3 ]. Nursing is dynamic and requires inspiring and engaging leaders and role models. However, the development of nurse leaders is challenging for the nursing profession.

Currently, nurses face a burnout epidemic rooted mainly in the work environment influenced by excessive workloads and a lack of organizational support and leadership [ 4 ]. Maben et al. (2022) reported that nurses globally face a heightened vulnerability to mental health issues and suicide, surpassing other occupational groups, while the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the existing challenges in their work environment, further intensifying the already demanding conditions [ 5 ]. The engagement in emotional labor within the nursing profession exposes practitioners to a notable susceptibility to experiencing burnout, moral distress, and compassion fatigue. Prior to the onset of the pandemic, the international cadre of nurses was already confronting considerable hurdles, encompassing prolonged duty durations, rotation schedules, inadequate staffing, and periodically arduous situations [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Throughout the pandemic, nurses encountered a range of stress-inducing factors, including managing heightened public expectations and pressure, adapting to new work responsibilities, facing elevated mortality rates, dealing with the infectious nature of COVID-19, experiencing psychosocial stress, confronting the scarcity of personal protective equipment, handling demanding job requirements, and contending with inadequate psychological support [ 8 ]. At the same time, scholars have found poor working conditions for nurses and inadequate staffing to predict adverse patient outcomes based on the low-quality nursing job atmosphere and the absence of appropriate leadership styles [ 9 , 10 ].

Safety issues in care, such as adverse events, medication errors, falls, and surgery mistakes, have plagued healthcare systems internationally for decades. Several investigations have acknowledged healthcare environments as high-risk with a lack of safety culture, causing long-delayed discharge, disability, or even death [ 2 , 11 ]. Inherently, the nursing profession and current healthcare climate are chaotic, and a positive safety culture has been proven to come from a creditable and visible leader who supports patient safety behaviors [ 12 ]. It is important to recognize that nurses have the highest patient interaction, making nurse leaders central catalysts to positively influencing patient safety culture to reach safer patient outcomes [ 13 , 14 ].

The quality of the nursing work environment is an indicator of nurse satisfaction. A leader who involves staff fosters teamwork, rewards good performance, and encourages motivation can impact the quality of work life [ 15 , 16 ]. The leadership style describes how the leader interacts with others and can be categorized into two main styles: task-oriented and relational [ 17 ]. Historically, leadership theories started with the Great Man Theory during the Industrial Revolution with strong hierarchical leader-centric decision making, focusing on command-and-control, productivity, and seeing the organization as linear, operating like a machine [ 18 ]. This leadership style model in healthcare is no longer sustainable, as proven by a lack of change and persisting patient safety issues. Researchers have found that healthcare innovation requires nonlinear and emergent social processes that result in improved organizational outcomes [ 19 ]. In recent years, the two relational styles, transformational and transactional leadership, have been explored through nursing literature and have become high profile in general healthcare research.

Transformational leadership is composed of four key components. Firstly, “idealized influence” involves the leader behaving as a robust role model toward followers, demonstrating a work ethic and strong values while preaching the organization’s vision, thereby winning the staff’s trust and confidence [ 20 ]. The second type of behavior is referred to as “inspirational motivation”. It includes creating a compelling and inspiring vision for the future and communicating it to followers through emotionally charged speeches, vivid imagery, and captivating symbols. This encourages followers to strive to reach this shared vision, thus creating a deeper level of commitment and higher performance [ 17 ]. The third type of behavior is called “intellectual stimulation”. Intellectual stimulation encourages followers to think outside the box and consider different approaches to everyday issues, enabling them to devise innovative solutions to these problems [ 21 ]. The final category of behaviors is “individualized consideration”, including coaching, helping followers achieve goals, and providing a supportive climate. By carefully listening, leaders can help fulfill those needs [ 22 ]. For instance, some followers might require explicit guidance regarding how to get a job done, while others require the provision of needed resources so they can figure out the solution on their own. Nonetheless, TFL’s four behaviors construct a transformational leader if performed consistently and are found to bring respect and admiration by followers [ 23 ].

1.1. Rational

Healthcare systems are globally facing a crisis, with nurse shortage being a perennial issue. Nurses have the highest patient interaction, making nurse leaders central catalysts in positively influencing patient safety culture to reach safer patient outcomes [ 13 ]. At the same time, negative nursing work environments cultivate dissatisfied nurses who are likely to suffer from emotional exhaustion or burnout because of ineffective leadership [ 14 ]. Amidst these challenges, there is growing recognition of the potential impact of transformational leadership in healthcare settings.

Transformational leadership is characterized by its focus on relationship-building, empowering followers, and emphasizing shared values and vision. This leadership style has been found to positively affect various industries and sectors, including healthcare. However, there remains a gap in knowledge regarding its specific effectiveness in healthcare settings. A comprehensive analysis of the potential benefits of transformational leadership in the healthcare context is warranted. This systematic review aims to address this gap by investigating the effectiveness of transformational leadership and its potential to create better working environments, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. We have identified a crucial area of inquiry that has not been thoroughly examined in the existing literature—a systematic review that delves into the relationship between transformational leadership and its effects on both the working environment and patient outcomes. We have identified a single literature review from the preceding decade (2002–2012) that focused on the efficacy of transformational leadership in relation to both work environments and patient outcomes [ 24 ]. Considering this, our current investigation is oriented towards delving into scholarly works spanning the subsequent decade (2012–2022), with the intention of comprehensively examining the evolving discourse on this subject matter. By exploring and synthesizing the current body of knowledge on this topic, our study will contribute valuable insights to the field, allowing healthcare organizations to better understand the impact of transformational leadership and make informed decisions regarding their leadership practices.

The significance of this research lies in its potential to shed light on a promising approach to address the pressing challenges faced by healthcare systems—nurse shortage and dissatisfaction—through effective leadership strategies. By providing evidence-based insights, this review seeks to guide healthcare leaders in adopting transformational leadership practices to create a positive work environment for nurses, reducing emotional exhaustion and burnout, and ultimately enhancing patient care and safety.

In conclusion, the dearth of research on the relationship between transformational leadership, work environment, and patient outcomes in healthcare settings highlights the necessity of this review. By examining the effectiveness of transformational leadership and its potential impact on nurses’ well-being and patient outcomes, our study aims to fill this critical gap in knowledge and contribute to the advancement of healthcare leadership practices.

1.2. Objective and Research Question

Having delineated the rationale and imperative for conducting this systematic review, our primary aim was to search, retrieve, and critically evaluate all pertinent studies centered around the concept of transformational leadership, with a particular focus on its efficacy in fostering an improved working environment for nurses and influencing patient outcomes comprehensively and systematically.

Our aim was to synthesize and analyze studies, and therefore, we used the PICo framework for studies to determine a research question. PICo is the simplest of the frameworks to use for qualitative questions; it stands for Population, Interest, and Context and can be used to find a range of primary literature. The Population in our study is nurses; the Interest is transformational leadership, working environments, and patient outcomes; and the Context is hospitals. Based on the PICo framework, we formulated our research question as follows: “What is the impact of transformational leadership on staff nurse work environments and patient outcomes?”

2. Methodology

To effectively accomplish our aim and investigate our research question, we utilized a systematic review approach following the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA 2020 statement [ 25 ]. The PRISMA 2020 checklist is available in Appendix A . In the subsequent subsections, we provide a comprehensive overview of our methodology.

2.1. Eligibility Criteria

Each of the chosen studies incorporated in this systematic review had to fulfill specific inclusion criteria, as outlined in Table 1 provided below.

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria.

Inclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
Peer ReviewedThe sample does not include nurses
Primary sourcesSecondary sources
Include nurses in the study sample Not written in the English Language
Written in English Published earlier than 2012
Published between 2012 and 2022 (to capture a broad range of research on our topic within the last decade)

2.2. Information Sources and Search Strategy

We used the following databases to choose the articles: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and SCIENCE DIRECT. The search approach employed the Boolean operator OR between the keywords nurse, working environments, patients’ outcomes, and transformational leadership and comparable MeSH phrases. To refine the search, phrases with diverse meanings were joined using the Boolean operator AND. The search approach used on the EBSCO platform for the aforementioned databases is described in Table 2 We limited the search to journal articles in English with the full text available. However, numerous studies were rejected as they referred to other leadership styles than transformational leadership in addition to other healthcare settings than a nursing work environment.

Search approach.

Population Interest Context
(TL (“Registered Nurse” OR “RN” OR “Nurs * p *” OR “Nursing staff” OR “Clinical nurse” OR “Nurse specialist” OR “Nurse clinician” OR “Nursing care provider” OR “Nursing team member”) OR AB (“Registered Nurse” OR “RN” OR “Nurs * p *” OR “Nursing staff” OR “Clinical nurse” OR “Nurse specialist” OR “Nurse clinician” OR “Nursing care provider” OR “Nursing team member”) OR DE “Nursing”)AND(TL (“Transformational leadership” OR “TFL” OR “Transformational leader*” OR “Transformational manager*”) OR AB (“Transformational leadership” OR “TFL” OR “Transformational leader *” OR “Transformational manager *”) OR DE “Transformational leadership”)AND(TL (“Work Environment” OR “Working Conditions” OR “Workplace” OR “Job Satisfaction” OR “Patient Outcome” OR “Health Outcome” OR “Treatment Outcome”) OR AB (“Work Environment” OR “Working Conditions” OR “Workplace” OR “Job Satisfaction” OR “Patient Outcome” OR “Health Outcome” OR “Treatment Outcome”) OR MM (“Working Environments” OR “Outcome Assessment, Health Care”))

* The asterisk in Ebsco platform wildcard in search finds words with a common root.

2.3. Selection of Studies Process

Two researchers (the first two authors) conducted independent searches, retrievals, and selections of studies, initially based on three primary criteria: (a) the presence of primary research, (b) the inclusion of transformational leadership as a topic, and (c) relevance to nursing care. Subsequently, additional criteria, such as peer-reviewed articles published in journals or conference proceedings, as well as the publication date, were employed for further refinement. Upon completing the initial selection process, the two researchers engaged in discussions and compiled a list of prospective articles. This list was shared with four other researchers, who collectively determined the final articles to be included in the review, making any necessary additions or removals as deemed appropriate.

2.4. Data Collection Process

The data from the selected studies were independently collected by two researchers. They extracted the components, items, statements, or competencies that had achieved consensus among experts during the final round of each study. Specifically, the following data from each study were extracted: title of the study, authors’ names, publication year, study design, tools, sample characteristics, and summary of main findings and results. Subsequently, the researchers thoroughly reviewed the extracted data multiple times and proceeded to code and identify overarching themes.

2.5. Synthesis Methods

The data were synthesized by content analysis, and the findings were categorized into themes. After carefully examining the results and findings section of a chosen article, an initial set of codes was created. These codes underwent further improvement as more articles were analyzed. Each line of text was assigned a code, and a code tree was utilized to identify emerging themes. From the interpreted meanings, sub-themes were derived and combined. These sub-themes underwent further analysis and were eventually condensed into a single overarching theme. Content analysis can aid in the identification and summarization of submerging key elements within a large body of data during the review process [ 26 ]. The themes of the effectiveness of TFL in the nursing environment were organized according to the content analysis suggested by Zhang and Wildemuth (2009) [ 27 ].

To ensure the validity of the results, a two-level quality assurance process was implemented. The authors of this paper independently followed the review procedure, including coding, categorization, revisiting the studies, and refining the codes and categories. Subsequently, they convened, engaged in discussions, refined the analysis, and finalized the results.

This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement ( Figure 1 ) [ 25 ], which provides a set of guidelines for conducting reviews and meta-analyses in a comprehensive and systematic manner.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nursrep-13-00108-g001.jpg

PRISMA flowchart with the search strategy of the systematic review.

3.1. Studies Selection

The initial search process resulted in 71 articles related to transformational leadership. There were no duplications ( Figure 1 ), and therefore, 71 articles were included for advance screening. Fourteen (14) articles did not relate to nurses’ work environment and were omitted. Two researchers thoroughly reviewed the remaining 57 articles independently. From this process, 34 articles were excluded as they did not satisfy the criteria for inclusion. The final number of articles that met the criteria for inclusion was twenty-three (23).

3.2. Studies Characteristics

These 23 articles were conducted in various countries and assessed the effect of transformational leadership in a nursing clinical work environment. Most of the studies included a multifactor leadership questionnaire to evaluate nurses’ perceived effectiveness of transformational leadership (1–10, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 22, 23). Further information about the articles, such as author, year, tool, methodology, sample, and main results, is described in Table 3 below.

Articles Description.

Authors and YearToolMethodologySampleMain Results
TFL—Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ)
Job satisfaction—Global Job Satisfaction Scale (GJSS)
Conditions Of Work-Effectiveness II (CWEQ-II)
Nurse-assessed adverse patient outcomes
Cross-sectional 378 nursesSignificant indirect relationship between TFL and adverse patient outcomes.
The level of staff empowerment strongly influences the job satisfaction of nurses.
Nurses perceived TFL behaviors of managers to be moderate.
TFL (7-item scale)
Structural empowerment (12-item scale)
Job satisfaction (3-item scale)
Adverse patient outcomes (5-item scale)
Cross-sectional386 nursesTFL behavior was found to have a positive effect on patient outcomes, decreasing the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and improving the overall quality of care. The mediator between TFL and these desired patient outcomes was structural empowerment and job satisfaction.
Nurses perceived TFL behaviors of managers to be high.
TFL—Transformational Leadership Scale (TLS)
Medication error—Medication Safety Scale (MSS)
Cross-sectional 161 nursesNurses did not perceive managers to fully adapt TFL behaviors.
Support for professional development was strongly perceived.
Giving feedback and rewarding was the weakest area of TFL.
TFL related the strongest to medication safety through the management of the nursing process.
TFL—The Global Transformational Leadership Scale (GTL)
Job demands and resources—Short Inventory to Monitor Psychological Hazards (SIMPH)/Job Demands–Resources model Patient safety culture—Nursing Home Survey On Patient Safety Culture (NHSOPSC)
Cross-sectional156 nursesThe speed of work and the amount of emotional strain on employees had a negative effect on patient safety culture. The impact of TFL on patient safety culture and overall perception of patient safety was the most significant factor.
TFL—The Global Transformational Leadership Scale (GTL)
Job demands and resources—Short Inventory to Monitor Psychological Hazards (SIMPH)/Job Demands–Resources model Patient safety culture—Nursing Home Survey On Patient Safety Culture (NHSOPSC)
Cross-sectional 139 nursesTFL was responsible for 35.7% of variance in patient safety culture
TFL and job resources positively related to work engagement
Skill utilization was the strongest single predictor of work engagement compared to TFL.
TFL—Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ)
Knowledge-related job characteristics—Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ)
Safety performance and compliance
Cross-sectional 152 nurses The more transformational the leader was perceived, the more nursing staff participated and complied with patient safety.
Indirect link between TFL and safety performance via knowledge-related job characteristics.
TFL can influence perceptions of knowledge-related job characteristics of followers through intellectual stimulation.
TFL—MLQ
Psychological empowerment
Employee commitment
Cross-sectional 332 acute care nurses Highest perceived leadership style was TFL, with inspirational motivation and idealized attributes being high.
Transactional leadership and laissez-faire leadership had a more positive and significant effect on commitment than TFL.
Having a TFL style of management can increase employee devotion through granting authority, as well as involving staff in the decision-making process.
TFL—Global Transformational Leadership Scale (GTFLS)
Organizational trust—organizational trust scale
Organizational identification—Organizational identification
Job stress—Job Stress Scale (JSS) 7 items
Cross-sectional150 nursesNon-punctuative reporting medical errors: 52.7% no adverse events reported in 12 months, 31.3% reported 1–2 adverse events and 10% reported 3–5 adverse events.
Positive relationship between organizational identification, organizational trust, and TFL.
TFL—MLQ-5X
Structural empowerment—C WEQ11
Cross-sectional181 clinical nurses Statistically significant correlation between staff nurses’ perception of managers’ TFL behaviors and their structural empowerment as frontline staff.
A negative correlation was found between structural empowerment and staff nurses’ perception of NMs’ laissez-faire leadership.
TFL—adopted from earlier studies 19 items
Patient safety climate
Cross-sectional439 nursesManager support was highly associated with nurse innovation behaviors.
TFL had a significantly positive effect on nurse innovation behavior.
TFL was strongly related to both innovation climate and patient safety climate.
Patient safety culture—AHRQ (2004)
TFL—Forces of Magnetism questionnaire
Cross-sectional324 nursing staffTFL was found to have a high magnetic force.
Strong positive correlation between TFL and patient safety culture.
Management support for patient safety was reported as highly important.
Patient safety culture—HSPSCPatient satisfaction—RHCS
Descriptive correlational2566 patients
5778 nursing staff and leaders
Highest score of managers TFL behavior: support for professional development.
Feedback and rewards were the weakest for nurse managers.
Awareness of the work of nursing directors was low.
Patient satisfaction outcome was the only factor exceeding target level.
TFL—MLQ
Job satisfaction
Empowerment
Cross-sectional 200 clinical nursesTFL showed a significant indirect positive effect on job satisfaction.
TFL was directly related to fostering structural empowerment, which in turn affected job satisfaction positively.
Organizational commitment
Job satisfaction
TFL
Cross-sectional1037 newly licensed registered nursesTFL did not have direct impact on intent to stay.
Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, RN-MD collaboration, and mentor support had a positive effect on the intent to stay.
TFL had non-significant direct probability of increasing organizational commitment.
TFL was not found to be a significant predictor of job satisfaction.
Spiritual Climate Scale
Emotional Exhaustion ScaleIntent to leave—Turnover Intention Scale
Cross-sectional319 nurse clinicians Nurse staff experienced moderate levels of TFL.
Nurses frequently felt emotional exhaustion, burnt out, and had thoughts of leaving profession.
Strong relationship between TFL and spiritual climate, where spiritual climate had a mediating effect on TFL’s ability to reduce burnout and intention to leave.
TFL—research questionnaire
Clan culture Organizational Culture Measurement Scale
Organizational commitmentJob satisfaction
Cross-sectional217 geriatric nurses TFL and clan culture together explained job satisfaction amongst nursing staff.
Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and professional identity had a significantly positive effect on willingness to stay.
MLQ-5X—shorter rate form
Workplace culture six-item measure created for the study
Job satisfaction—GJS
Burnout—MBI-
COVID-19—measured with six items around demand and pressure
Cross-sectional645 nursesTFL had a strong, significantly positive effect on job satisfaction and workplace culture and a negative effect on burnout.
TFL was found to, directly and indirectly, improve work environment.
Direct, robust positive relationship between TFL and workplace culture.
TFL can influence staff nurses’ satisfaction and mitigate the risk of burnout by establishing a supportive and inclusive work environment.
TFL—GTL
Team performance
Team climate
Knowledge sharing
Cross-sectional183 geriatric nursesTFL facilitated a safe team climate, which allowed knowledge sharing and reflection on processes and tasks.
This was found to increase the team performance, including effectiveness and innovativeness.
TFL enhanced learning activities of teams, which in turn affects their performance and outcomes positively.
Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) Patient safety culture—HSOPSCCross-sectionalNursing managers and nursing staffNursing manager’s perception of their own TFL was higher than staff nurses.
Lowest sub-dimension was the sub-dimensions of staffing, non-punctuative response to errors, and frequency of errors reported by both parties, at lower than 50%, indicating PSC weakness.
Semi-structured interviewQualitative study11 nurse managers Adverse events reporting reform leaving dysfunctional operational models.
Encouraging nursing staff’s openness around adverse events by establishing a blame-free culture.
Blame and shame—a challenge to recognize adverse events.
TFL—MLQ
Patient safety—PSQ
Cross-sectional1355 nurses and pharmacists Non-significant effect on error reporting compared to transactional leaders who showed higher levels of good reporting practices.
Even though TFL was main behavior, no preventative actions were mentioned in incident reports.
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
Karasek’s Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ)
Occupational Stress Indicator (OSI)
Organisational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ)
General Health Questionnaire
Cross-sectional651 nursesBased on the main hypotheses of the research, the results revealed a positive relationship between nursing transformational leadership and general health status.
The supervisor support plays a mediating role between transformational leadership styles and job satisfaction.
Supervisor support has a dramatic influence on employees’ job satisfaction compared with other factors.
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
Organizational Description Questionnaire
Annual quality indicators from the hospitals
Cross-sectional1626 health care workers In each hospital, 66.4% to 87.1% of participants identified their hospital’s organizational culture as transformational, whereas 41 out of 48 departments were identified as having a transformational culture.
The differences between leadership style and organizational culture were statistically significant for four of the hospitals.
For most of the quality indicators, there was a positive but non-significant, correlation with leadership style.

3.3. Study Assessment

The quality of the articles included in this review was checked by the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument Critical Appraisal Checklist. The Joanna Briggs checklist evaluates the methodological quality of a study while determining the possibility of an indication of bias in its conduct, design, and analysis. As can be seen from Table 3 , there were 21 cross-sectional studies (1–11, 13–19, 21–23), 1 descriptive–correlational study (12), and 1 qualitative study (20).

All the included studies largely adhered to the Joanna Briggs criteria, providing comprehensive and detailed descriptions of their respective methodologies and procedures Table 4 , Table 5 and Table 6 . However, it was observed that two of the cross-sectional studies did not explicitly outline any specific strategies to address the stated confounding factors. Nevertheless, as Dekkers et al. (2019) argue, confounding is not dichotomous but rather a continuum where varying degrees of confounding influence can exist [ 28 ]. Furthermore, in accordance with the Joanna Briggs guidelines, the qualitative study failed to disclose the researcher’s cultural or theoretical standpoint, as well as the potential influence of the researcher on the research process. It is worth noting that such omissions are common in qualitative studies, where the focus is on understanding the subjectivity of the participants and allowing their perspectives to emerge naturally.

JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies.

Authors and YearQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8
Boamah, S., Spence Laschinger, H., Wong, C., and Clarke, S. (2018)
Asif, M., Jameel, A., Hussain, A., Hwang, J., and Sahito, N. (2019)
Lappalainen, M., Härkänen, M., and Kvist, T. (2020)
Seljemo, C., Viksveen, P., and Ree, E. (2020)
Ree, E. and Wiig, S. (2019)
Lievens and Vlerick, P. (2014)
Asiri, S., Rohrer, W., Al-Surimi, K., Da’ar, O., and Ahmed, A. (2016)
Y Tekingündüz, S., Yıldız, E., and İnci, R. (2021)
Choi, S., Goh, C., Adam, M., and Tan, O. (2016)
Khan, B., Quinn Griffin, M., and Fitzpatrick, J. (2018)
Weng, R., Huang, C., Chen, L., and Chang, L. (2015)
El-Demerdash, A. M. S., Elhosany, W. A., and Hefny, M. A. M (2018)
Brewer, C., Kovner, C., Djukic, M., Fatehi, F., Greene, W., Chacko, T., and Yang, Y. (2016)
Xie, Y. et al. (2020)
Boamah, S.A. (2022)
Anselmann, V. and Mulder, R.H. (2020)
Yilmaz, A. and Duygulu, S. (2020)
Wagner, A. et al. (2019)
ALFadhalah, T. and Elamir, H. (2021)
Liukka, M., Hupli, M., and Turunen, H. (2017)
Lin, PY., MacLennan, S., and Hunt, N (2015)

Risk of Bias Assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Study Results.

Authors and YearQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10
Liukka, M., Hupli, M., and Turunen, H. (2017)NoNo

JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data Results.

Authors and YearQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9
Kvist, T., Mäntynen, R., Turunen, H., Partanen, P., Miettinen, M., Wolf, G., and Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2013)

3.4. Results of Synthesis

Two major themes emerged, effectively addressing the research questions. Within each theme, several categories were identified, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of the topic under investigation. The themes and their corresponding categories were as follows.

Theme 1: Staff nurses’ work environment:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment;
  • Reduce Nurse Retention;
  • Nurses’ Empowerment and Autonomy;
  • Nurses’ Compliance with Safety Measures.

Theme 2: Patients’ outcomes:

  • Patient Safety Culture;
  • Reporting Adverse Events.

3.4.1. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment

Various studies that investigated the mechanism of TFL detected its strong influence on employee attitudes and behaviors in nursing. Nurses’ work attitudes are reflected in their levels of job satisfaction and organizational commitment [ 29 , 30 ]. It was clear from the literature that TFL frequently positively influenced nurses’ work environment by indirectly increasing job satisfaction [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Employees’ positive perception of jobs and organization is revealed through job satisfaction [ 30 ]. Researchers link TFL and empowerment to the establishment of self-determination and competency, which is proven to impact job satisfaction, suggesting the direct relationship between nurse empowerment and nurse job satisfaction, enhancing the quality of the nurses’ work environment [ 9 , 32 ].

There is also evidence to construct a strong link between organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Interestingly, the statistics showed that nursing staff committed to their organization with a strong sense of loyalty and dependence also had higher levels of job satisfaction [ 29 , 33 ]. Further, higher levels of organizational commitment and job satisfaction were also associated with increased health status in the nurses [ 33 ]. More specifically, TFL was related to more excellent supervisor support, increasing job satisfaction among the nurses, and resulting in more significant organizational commitment [ 29 ]. In a study examining the effectiveness of TFL in the environment of elderly care, TFL was found to effectively strengthen the nursing staff’s sense of belonging to the organization, reducing their burnout. The clan culture established through TFL effectively influenced organizational commitment and job satisfaction, where the atmosphere of a home culture created within their work environment promoted the intrinsic values of nursing staff while improving cohesion between the nurses and the quality of care [ 33 ]. However, TFL was found to have a direct positive effect on organizational commitment [ 33 , 35 ].

3.4.2. Reducing Intention to Leave the Job/Organization

Studies also found that TFL can reduce the nurses’ intent to leave the job, which is closely related to the previous category, as job dissatisfaction can be the primary precursor of nurses’ intent to leave [ 29 ]. The literature generally highlights that the TFL style shapes employees’ perceptions and feelings around their nursing managers and affects their desire and obligation to maintain the intent to stay in their organization [ 36 ]. A recent cross-sectional study examining 645 nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic found that a supportive workplace culture can construct an adaptive mechanism through which transformational leaders can improve retention [ 37 ]. Additionally, the literature found TFL to decrease emotional exhaustion amongst nurses by encouraging a spiritual climate, indicating that a positive spiritual climate facilitated through TFL can reduce burnout and decrease nursing staff’s intent to leave [ 31 ]. However, there was insufficient evidence proving a direct correlation between TFL and staff nurses’ decision to stay or leave their job [ 33 , 35 ], but it was suggested that TFL has the potential (but not the primary factor) to slow down attrition and retain nurses by improving job satisfaction and organizational commitment, creating a positive work environment and increasing nurses’ probability of staying [ 35 ]. TFL seems to not act directly on job satisfaction or intent to stay but rather create a multifaceted positive work environment leading to a quality nursing environment. Consequently, it was reported that TFL indirectly influenced willingness to stay by positively influencing staff organizational commitment and job satisfaction [ 29 , 33 , 35 ].

3.4.3. Nurses’ Empowerment and Autonomy

Literature highlights that the TFL style within nursing can give staff nurses increased autonomy through empowerment strategies and meaningful participation in decision-making [ 30 , 31 , 36 ]. In turn, TFL-facilitated empowerment has been proven to increase employee commitment within their units by delegating power to nurses, leading to increased authority within their work environment [ 30 , 36 ]. Empowerment through decision-making involvement via removing formal organizational barriers has been found to reduce powerlessness in the nurse work environment, reducing job burnout and increasing job satisfaction [ 30 ]. RN-MD collaboration and teamwork within and across units were thought to be necessary for the nurse’s autonomy [ 38 ]. Further, the literature relates to the concept that a well-functioning patient safety climate requires nurses with autonomy to deal with problems regarding patient safety while proposing specific solutions and getting support and encouragement from organizations to facilitate patient safety-based innovations [ 39 ].

TFL and transactional leadership behaviors were found to affect empowerment amongst the nursing staff positively. However, TFL behaviors allowed nursing managers to reach even higher levels of success without congruence and reward, embedding empowerment into the clinical environment [ 40 ]. Some studies also identified the empowerment subscale, autonomy, as the statistically significant predictor of commitment, indicating that managers can engage nurses in appropriate decision making about patient care and safety in their work environment [ 30 , 36 ]. Management that does not accept decision-making participation dissembles empowerment, which frustrates and makes staff dependent on an authoritarian structure [ 36 ].

3.4.4. Nurses’ Compliance with Safety Measures

Lievens and Vlerick (2014) found a strong association between TFL and nurse safety compliance [ 41 ]. The more transformational the leader was perceived, the more the nursing staff participated and complied with patient safety practices. Further, staff nurses’ structural empowerment also experienced a significant correlation with the degree to which they perceived nursing managers’ (NMs) TFL behaviors [ 36 , 40 ]. Research also suggested that when nurses perceived their TFL to facilitate an innovative work climate, they automatically contributed to developing innovation behaviors [ 39 ]. Previously mentioned research suggested that nurses need to feel a part of their work environment. However, countries where staff are hesitant to challenge authority create a reluctance to change, and compliance can breed a lack of stimulation [ 31 ]. It was reported that nurse managers should be trained to challenge nurses to resolve problems and specialize their competence to foster innovation and grow talents and creativity [ 36 ].

Lievens and Vlerick (2014), in their cross-sectional study which included 145 nurses, also found intellectual stimulation to strongly impact knowledge-related characteristics, suggesting an indirect link between safety performance and TFL through skills and ability demands, where the more knowledge-related job characteristics were perceived, the more nurses complied with safety rules [ 41 ]. Skill utilization or intellectual stimulation was further found to be the strongest single predictor of work engagement, compared to TFL, where nurses appreciated opportunities for personal development, learning new things, and achieving something meaningful, encouraging work engagement [ 2 , 42 ].

Patients’ outcomes:

The literature shows a positive relationship between TFL and the improvement of patient safety climate and culture, emphasizing that nursing managers are key to developing a safety climate and maintaining a culture of patient safety, preventing adverse events.

3.4.5. Increase Patient Safety Culture

There was a significant prevalence of findings reporting TFL to facilitate patient safety either directly [ 2 , 9 , 38 , 42 ] or indirectly [ 32 , 39 , 41 ]. Seljemo et al. (2020), in their cross-sectional study, questioned 156 nurses; Ree and Wiig (2019), also in a cross-sectional design study, questioned 139 nurses and found TFL to be the strongest predictor of patient safety culture and overall perception of patient safety compared to job demands and resources [ 2 , 42 ]. This was suggested to result from TFL having a positive direct effect on the psychosocial work environment. Further evidence also links TFL directly to quality patient outcomes, reducing the possibility of adverse patient outcomes and increasing the quality of care [ 9 ].

Patient safety culture includes themes such as teamwork within units, managers’ support, organizational learning, overall perceptions of safety, feedback and communication openness about the error, frequency of events reported, staffing, handoffs and transitions, and non-punitive response to errors. “Teamwork within units” generally had a common positive perception amongst the nurses, indicating collaboration within their units as effective within TFL [ 38 , 43 , 44 ]. Anselmann and Mulder (2020) asked 183 geriatric nurses in their cross-sectional study, and they support the above, finding that TFL has a positive impact on team performance when a safe climate is fostered [ 45 ]. Even though nurses found cohesion within their units, literature revealed a common theme of insufficient “teamwork between units”, indicating that each unit had an independent culture [ 38 , 43 , 44 ]. Further, a generally weak perception of the effectiveness of RN-MD collaboration was also observed [ 38 , 43 ].

Researchers stressed the necessity of having efficient teamwork between units and on a multi-professional level to create an effective patient safety culture [ 9 ]. Another reoccurring subdimension, “feedback and rewarding”, was also identified as a weak component of TFL in relation to patient safety culture, illustrating a lack of adaptation and implementation of TLF behavior [ 9 , 43 , 46 ]. The TFL nursing manager generally seemed to conduct insufficient work around feedback and rewards, resulting in staff nurses not being encouraged and ensuring that medical errors were prevented and learned from [ 43 , 46 ].

3.4.6. Reporting Adverse Events

Adverse events can result in patient disability or death, prolong the time necessary to provide care, and increase healthcare costs and patient dissatisfaction [ 47 ]. However, a part of the literature showed that when TFL and transactional leadership were compared, reporting errors without blame and discussing errors openly were the two initiatives that transactional leadership implemented better than TFL [ 40 , 48 ]. A significant finding in the literature was the reoccurring theme of weak patient safety culture in relation to “non-punctual reporting of adverse events” in hospitals with TFL, where staff nurses rarely reported occurring medical errors to their NMs [ 34 , 44 , 46 , 48 , 49 ]. In a Finnish study, one in four nurses showed to not have reported one or more medication errors using their units’ adverse event registration system [ 46 ]. Tekingündüz et al. (2021), in a cross-sectional study with 150 participating nurses, also found a significant weakness in their organization’s patient safety culture, where 52.7% of the nurses did not report any adverse events in the last 12 months, 31.3% reported 1–2 adverse events while 10% reported 3–5 adverse events [ 49 ]. Further, in a qualitative study, the eleven nurse manager participants expressed the importance of nursing staff reporting the occurrence of adverse events to detect why each event happened and identify patient safety risks and solutions [ 50 ]. There was evidence to suggest that nurses reported that the occurrence of errors only sometimes led to a positive change, whereas at other times, it did not lead to any change, and errors were repeated [ 38 ]. The literature explained blame culture and fear in the nurse’s work environment as a factor distancing them from punctuative reporting of medical errors [ 46 , 49 , 50 ]. It was suggested by researchers that nursing staff were not encouraged to report and discuss adverse events openly and blame-free [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. This involves handling adverse reports by nursing managers without making nursing staff feel guilty.

Managers reported that a culture where it is recognized that everyone makes mistakes is imperial, while it was observed that nurses tended to report other colleagues’ mistakes compared to their own [ 50 ]. Further, nursing managers noticed that nursing staff may blame themselves for a patient safety incident where they feel ashamed and worry about their colleague’s perception of them [ 49 ]. These perceptions were confirmed by nursing staff in another study, expressing their tendency to avoid reporting due to fear of punishment, humiliation, damage to reputation, disciplinary action by a licensing board, malpractice lawsuits, and limited follow-up after reporting loss of job [ 48 ]. Tekingündüz et al. (2021) also found the defect in reporting medical errors to be rooted in nurse’s fear of punishment and lack of confidentiality [ 49 ]. Generally, fear was perceived as a major reason for not reporting adverse events, and nursing managers saw this as a barrier to the effectiveness of their leadership and the attempt to develop their operational models to improve patient safety [ 46 , 49 , 50 ]. However, visionary leadership styles such as TFL correlate positively with both incident reporting and patient safety outcomes. Additionally, TFL is linked to improved patient safety, including reduced mortality rates, fewer medication errors, lower incidences of pneumonia and urinary tract infections, and fewer patient falls, attributed to the leaders’ approach of using errors as chances to enhance processes and promoting the reporting of near misses and adverse events [ 17 , 51 ].

Interestingly, a part of the literature showed that when TFL and transactional leadership were compared, reporting errors without blame and discussing errors openly were the two initiatives that transactional leadership implemented better than TFL [ 40 , 48 ]. These findings confirm the weakness around reporting adverse events and blame culture within TFL units.

4. Discussion

This review has collectively reviewed literature that has examined the effectiveness of transformational leadership (TFL) in a nursing work environment and patients’ outcomes. TFL has a complex, interconnected effect on nurses’ intrinsic environment and patient outcomes.

Nurses’ Work Environment:

The literature revealed substantial evidence that TFL can significantly enhance nurses’ psychosocial work environment by indirectly increasing job satisfaction. Three significant mediators between TFL and job satisfaction were nurse empowerment, organizational commitment, and spiritual climate, which altogether were thought to prevent retention in nursing [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 37 ]. Simultaneously, TFL was not the primary factor in job satisfaction but instead a facilitator and constructor of structural empowerment, organizational commitment, and spiritual climate. It is, therefore, evident that the literature revealed a positive domino effect that transformational leaders in nursing can generate. Generally, the literature revealed a strongly positive relationship between TFL and workplace culture in nursing [ 33 , 37 ]. Specific TFL attributes created an inclusive and supportive work environment, either directly or indirectly enhancing the nurses’ work environment and decreasing the risk of nurse burnout [ 37 , 52 ]. Nurses continuously reported managers’ support as a particularly important resource in their work environment, where establishing a high-quality relationship with their leaders was seen as imperial for patient safety culture [ 38 , 42 ].

The correlation observed between supportive leadership and favorable patient safety outcomes underscores the significance of Transformational Leaders (TFLs) possessing a comprehensive grasp of patient safety protocols, as well as recognizing the pivotal role played by bedside nurses in advancing improved safety outcomes. [ 17 ]. More specifically, managers’ support was also found to reinforce innovative behavior [ 39 ], increase job satisfaction [ 35 , 37 ], and even be the primary factor in a positive work environment, compared to TFL [ 29 ]. Conversely, the literature also described managers’ support as a core transformational behavior, where the more transformational the leader was perceived, the more the staff nurses experienced individual support in their clinical environment [ 29 , 42 , 46 ]. As concluded by the literature, TFL is not the primary factor but rather a mediator to job satisfaction, which was determined as an essential nursing outcome, shadowing quality work environment and may be an effective retention strategy in nursing. Previous studies confirm that safety outcomes are improved when workplace empowerment takes place in a positive nurse–leader relationship based on trust and respect, where they, together, work toward a patient safety culture [ 53 ].

Therefore, incorporating transformational leadership in nursing has numerous implications, with a direct and positive impact on job satisfaction. By nurturing a sense of purpose, providing support and empowerment, and promoting individual growth, transformational leaders create a fulfilling work environment that motivates nurses to excel. As nurses experience greater job satisfaction, patient care quality also improves, resulting in cooperative success for healthcare organizations, nursing staff, and the patients they serve.

Patients’ Outcomes:

The connection between supportive leadership and positive patient safety outcomes points to the importance of the TFL’s understanding of patient safety processes and the role of bedside nurses in promoting better safety outcomes [ 38 ]. However, several researchers reported not having a visible leader [ 43 ], which is documented as essential for patient safety changes to occur [ 53 ].

Researchers are linking negative patient safety outcomes to a lack of effective leadership, while relational leadership styles like transformational leadership continue to be associated with reduced adverse patient outcomes [ 17 ]. However, TFL nursing managers were repeatedly reported by the staff nurses only to communicate errors and problems after the adverse event, waiting for the event before resolving problems and taking proactive action [ 36 , 50 ]. Literature highlights that organizations that have successfully created a non-blame culture have better patient safety outcomes because the staff are encouraged to report errors, unsafe practices, and adverse events, perceiving safety around seeking help and assistance without threat [ 54 ]. Therefore, avoiding a blame culture and developing a reporting system serves as a proactive approach to identifying and mitigating risks, ultimately preventing errors and recurring mistakes, which, when left unaddressed, can result in significant social and economic burdens due to fatalities and preventable incidents [ 51 ] Additionally, developing a safety culture through managers’ interdisciplinary walkabout safety rounds has been associated with safety outcomes [ 17 ].

Transformational leadership in nursing has far-reaching implications for patient outcomes and care quality. By fostering a collaborative and patient-centered approach, empowering nursing staff, encouraging continuous learning, and promoting a culture of excellence, transformational leaders enhance the overall care experience for patients. Ultimately, the positive impact of transformational leadership on patient outcomes establishes it as a key factor in ensuring the delivery of high-quality healthcare services in nursing settings.

This literature review enriches nursing practice and research in a time where nursing leaders are sought to have an important and prominent role in healthcare policy development and improvement. Increased demand and complexity of patient care require effective and competent leadership skills and an understanding of TFL’s function in the current healthcare environment. Even though literature has constructed the idea of the nexus between patient safety and leadership, patient safety outcomes are unlikely to improve without facilitating and fostering the professional growth of future leaders. Additionally, factors influencing organizational job satisfaction and organizational commitment are significantly under the influence of TF nurse leaders. Therefore, healthcare organizations and the educational sector should invest in leadership training and curriculum to implement it further into nursing to support and ensure safe, quality work environments for both nurses and patients.

5. Limitations of the Study

This literature review predominantly incorporated quantitative research methodologies, which, in certain instances, can present challenges in contextualizing a phenomenon comprehensively, as the data may not always possess the robustness required to elucidate intricate issues. Additionally, it should be noted that the review’s scope was confined to studies published exclusively in the English language, with no inclusion of relevant content from the grey literature beyond the stipulated publication sources, and unpublished dissertations were also omitted from consideration. Consequently, it is essential to acknowledge that this review may not provide a fully representative overview of all pertinent scholarship within the field.

6. Conclusions

Despite the global recognition and attempted implementation of TFL in healthcare, the statistics still show that TFL is yet to be mastered within nursing. The strong relationship between TFL, structural empowerment, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment signify that an improved quality work environment may be the most essential element to enhance job effectiveness and patient safety in nursing. TFL is a vital facilitator that could help healthcare to improve job satisfaction and reduce adverse events. Evidence suggests that nursing managers who possess effective TFL attributes are likely to influence their nursing staff’s satisfaction and mitigate the risk of burnout by establishing a supportive and inclusive work environment directly or indirectly. Focusing on the adoption of a blame-free culture through effective leadership is likely to break down barriers to safety culture, which has resulted in poor patient care worldwide. Patient safety outcomes rely on a well-established patient safety culture, which is most influenced by the bedside nurse, either directly or indirectly. With effective leadership engagement and education, emerging nursing leaders can be supported while the nursing team can be empowered to make the necessary changes to reach levels of excellence within their units. It is important to comprehend that leaders are not just in executive and senior positions but include any part of the healthcare team that is influential to patient care. Effective TFL engagement has the potential to enhance patient safety, where it is conveyed that all healthcare workers, from executive to bedside nurses, participate in a positive safety culture.

PRISMA 2020 Checklist.

Section and Topic Item # Checklist ItemLocation Where Item Is Reported (Page Number)
Title1 Identify the report as a systematic review. 1
Abstract2 See the PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts checklist. 1
Rationale3 Describe the rationale for the review in the context of existing knowledge. 3
Objectives4 Provide an explicit statement of the objective(s) or question(s) the review addresses. 3
Eligibility criteria5 Specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review and how studies were grouped for the syntheses. 4
Information sources6 Specify all databases, registers, websites, organizations, reference lists, and other sources searched or consulted to identify studies. Specify the date
when each source was last searched or consulted.
4
Search strategy 7 Present the full search strategies for all databases, registers, and websites, including any filters and limits used. 4
Selection process 8 Specify the methods used to decide whether a study met the inclusion criteria of the review, including how many reviewers screened each record and each report retrieved, whether they worked independently, and, if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process. 5
Data collection process9 Specify the methods used to collect data from reports, including how many reviewers collected data from each report, whether they worked independently, any processes for obtaining or confirming data from study investigators, and, if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process. 5
Data items10a List and define all outcomes for which data were sought. Specify whether all results that were compatible with each outcome domain in each study were sought (e.g., for all measures, time points, analyses), and, if not, the methods used to decide which results to collect. N/A
10b List and define all other variables for which data were sought (e.g., participant and intervention characteristics, funding sources). Describe any assumptions made about any missing or unclear information. N/A
Study risk of bias assessment 11 Specify the methods used to assess risk of bias in the included studies, including details of the tool(s) used, how many reviewers assessed each study and whether they worked independently, and, if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process. 7
Effect measures12 Specify for each outcome the effect measure(s) (e.g., risk ratio, mean difference) used in the synthesis or presentation of results. N/A
Synthesis methods 13a Describe the processes used to decide which studies were eligible for each synthesis (e.g., tabulating the study intervention characteristics and comparing against the planned groups for each synthesis (item #5)). 20
13b Describe any methods required to prepare the data for presentation or synthesis, such as handling missing summary statistics or data conversions. N/A
13c Describe any methods used to tabulate or visually display results of individual studies and syntheses. N/A
13d Describe any methods used to synthesize results and provide a rationale for the choice(s). If meta-analysis was performed, describe the model(s), method(s) to identify the presence and extent of statistical heterogeneity, and software package(s) used. N/A
13e Describe any methods used to explore possible causes of heterogeneity among study results (e.g., subgroup analysis, meta-regression). N/A
13f Describe any sensitivity analyses conducted to assess robustness of the synthesized results. N/A
Reporting bias assessment 14 Describe any methods used to assess risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (arising from reporting biases). N/A
Certainty assessment 15 Describe any methods used to assess certainty (or confidence) in the body of evidence for an outcome. N/A
Study selection16a Describe the results of the search and selection process, from the number of records identified in the search to the number of studies included in the review, ideally using a flow diagram. 6
16b Cite studies that might appear to meet the inclusion criteria, but which were excluded, and explain why they were excluded. 6
Study characteristics17 Cite each included study and present its characteristics. 7
Risk of bias in studies18 Present assessments of risk of bias for each included study. N/A
Results of individual studies19 For all outcomes, present, for each study: (a) summary statistics for each group (where appropriate) and (b) an effect estimate and its precision (e.g., confidence/credible interval), ideally using structured tables or plots. N/A
Results of syntheses 20a For each synthesis, briefly summarize the characteristics and risk of bias among contributing studies. N/A
20b Present results of all statistical syntheses conducted. If meta-analysis was done, present for each the summary estimate and its precision (e.g.,
confidence/credible interval) and measures of statistical heterogeneity. If comparing groups, describe the direction of the effect.
N/A
20c Present results of all investigations of possible causes of heterogeneity among study results. 20–25
20d Present results of all sensitivity analyses conducted to assess the robustness of the synthesized results. 20–25
Reporting biases 21 Present assessments of risk of bias due to missing results (arising from reporting biases) for each synthesis assessed. N/A
Certainty of evidence22 Present assessments of certainty (or confidence) in the body of evidence for each outcome assessed. 20–25
Discussion23a Provide a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence. 25–26
23b Discuss any limitations of the evidence included in the review. 25–26
23c Discuss any limitations of the review processes used. 25–26
23d Discuss implications of the results for practice, policy, and future research. 25–26
Registration and protocol 24a Provide registration information for the review, including register name and registration number, or state that the review was not registered. N/A
24b Indicate where the review protocol can be accessed or state that a protocol was not prepared. N/A
24c Describe and explain any amendments to information provided at registration or in the protocol. N/A
Support 25 Describe sources of financial or non-financial support for the review and the role of the funders or sponsors in the review. 27
Competing
interests
26 Declare any competing interests of review authors. 27
Availability of data, code, and other materials 27 Report which of the following are publicly available and where they can be found: template data collection forms; data extracted from included studies; data used for all analyses; analytic code; any other materials used in the review. 31

From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/ , access on 26 March 2023.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, search, coding, and drafting, L.M.K.Y. and M.N.; search and quality assurance, coding, and feedback, S.G., E.L., G.P. and C.S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Data availability statement, public involvement statement.

No public involvement in any aspect of this research.

Guidelines and Standards Statement

This manuscript was drafted against the PRISMA 2020 Statement. A complete checklist is found in Appendix A of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Academic Support for Nursing Students

No notifications.

Disclaimer: This essay has been written by a student and not our expert nursing writers. View professional sample essays here.

View full disclaimer

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this essay are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NursingAnswers.net. This essay should not be treated as an authoritative source of information when forming medical opinions as information may be inaccurate or out-of-date.

Leadership Styles and Management in Mental Health Care

Info: 2697 words (11 pages) Nursing Essay Published: 11th Feb 2020

Reference this

Leadership Styles and Management

Executive summary:, struggling with your nursing essay(s).

  • An exact, 100% original answer to your essay question
  • From a graduate writer, qualified in your subject area
  • Delivered confidentially by email, in 3 hours - 10 days (you choose)

Introduction:

If you need assistance with writing your nursing essay, our professional nursing essay writing service is here to help!

Leadership Styles in Clinical Management -

Conclusion:, recommendations:, bibliography, cite this work.

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Related Services

Female student working on a laptop

  • Nursing Essay Writing Service

Male student reading book

  • Nursing Dissertation Service

Female student reading and using laptop to study

  • Reflective Writing Service

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on the NursingAnswers.net website then please:

Our academic writing and marking services can help you!

  • Marking Service
  • Samples of our Work
  • Full Service Portfolio

Related Lectures

Study for free with our range of nursing lectures!

  • Drug Classification
  • Emergency Care
  • Health Observation
  • Palliative Care
  • Professional Values

Illustration of a nurse writing a report

Write for Us

Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher in nursing or healthcare?

Study Resources

Free resources to assist you with your nursing studies!

  • APA Citation Tool
  • Example Nursing Essays
  • Example Nursing Assignments
  • Example Nursing Case Studies
  • Reflective Nursing Essays
  • Nursing Literature Reviews
  • Free Resources
  • Reflective Model Guides
  • Nursing and Healthcare Pay 2021

COMMENTS

  1. Leadership and mental health nursing

    This discussion paper argues for the critical importance of successful leadership for effective mental health nursing, observing that nursing leadership has long been regarded problematically by the profession. Using empirical and theoretical evidence we debate what leadership styles and strategies are most likely to result in effective ...

  2. Nursing Leadership: Making a Difference in Mental Health and ...

    Substance-Related Disorders / nursing*. Five nurse leaders in mental health offer their perspectives on key issues facing the sector and reflect on how nurses can make a difference in the following critical areas: nursing practice, transitions of care, innovative technologies, challenging stigma and creating patient partnerships.

  3. Clinical Leadership in Mental Health Nursing: The Importance of a Calm

    Research Higher Degree Student, Senior Nurse. Institute for Health and Social Science Research, Centre for Mental Health Nursing Innovation, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. North Western Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Author ...

  4. Leadership and management in mental health nursing

    blegen n.e. & severinsson e. (2011) Journal of Nursing Management19, 487-497 Leadership and management in mental health nursing. Background Mental health nurses are agents of change, and their leadership, management role and characteristics exist at many levels in health care. Previous research presents a picture of mental health nurses as subordinate and passive recipients of the leader's ...

  5. Nurses' leadership in psychiatric care—A qualitative interview study of

    The relationship between the psychiatric and mental health nurse and members of the staff, and how the communication between them takes place, is decisive for whether the leadership will work or not (Ennis et al., 2015). The deeper experience of how nurses experience their leadership in psychiatric care is, however, not fully explored.

  6. Leadership and Mental Health Nursing

    Abstract. This discussion paper argues for the critical importance of successful leadership for effective mental health nursing, observing that nursing leadership has long been regarded problematically by the profession. Using empirical and theoretical evidence we debate what leadership styles and strategies are most likely to result in ...

  7. Clinical leadership in mental health nursing: the importance of a calm

    Purpose: Explore the perceptions of nurses working in mental health of effective clinical leadership. Design and methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with registered nurses employed in a mental health setting. Qualitative research using grounded theory. Findings: Remaining calm and confident in times of crisis and uncertainty was identified as one attribute of clinical leadership.

  8. Leadership and management in mental health nursing

    The findings suggest mental health nurse leaders find intrinsic rewards in the role; aspire to making authentic connections with consumers; appreciate the position of trust that they hold in bearing witness to individuals' distress; and use creative means to solve problems and achieve therapeutic outcomes. Expand. 10.

  9. A systematic review of the relationships between nurse leaders

    Burnout subsequently had a negative effect on mental health (β = −.69). Indirect effects of authentic leadership on burnout and mental health were significant (β = .072 and β = .05) Majeed and Fatima , Pakistan. To test the impact of exploitative leadership on nurses' psychological distress.

  10. Leadership

    Abstract. Mental health nursing should inspire, support, and create the conditions under which people will flourish. To improve patient experience and sustain recovery-based outcomes, nurses must collaborate with other healthcare professionals, work alongside managers to support operational systems, and work in partnership with service users and their carers and families.

  11. The role of the mental health nursing leadership

    Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for. Women's Family & Child Health, Vestfold University College, Vestfold, Tønsberg, Norway. Introduction. Leadership in mental health nursing has changed as ...

  12. Clinical Leadership in Mental Health Nursing: The Importance of a Calm

    Contemporary Nurse, 37(2), 173-187. Happell, B. (2008). The importance of clinical experience for mental health nursing - Part 1: Undergraduate nursing 61 Clinical Leadership in Mental Health Nursing: The Importance of a Calm and Confident Approach students' attitudes, preparedness and satisfaction.

  13. The role of the mental health nursing leadership

    holm a.l. & severinsson e. (2010) Journal of Nursing Management18, 463-471 The role of the mental health nursing leadership. Aim The aim of the present study was to illuminate what the mental health nursing (MHN) leader needs in order to develop her/his leadership role.. Background MHN leadership has tended to focus on the nature of the care provided rather than the development of the role.

  14. Attributes, skills and actions of clinical leadership in nursing as

    Background Research shows a significant growth in clinical leadership from a nursing perspective; however, clinical leadership is still misunderstood in all clinical environments. Until now, clinical leaders were rarely seen in hospitals' top management and leadership roles. Purpose This study surveyed the attributes and skills of clinical nursing leadership and the actions that effective ...

  15. Leadership and management in mental health nursing

    In addition, a manual search for relevant papers and significant references, including theoretical papers and books related to the issue, was conducted. ... International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 17 (3), 162-170. Holm A.L. & Severinsson E. (2010) The role of the mental health nursing leadership. Journal of Nursing Management 18 (4 ...

  16. The Importance of Being a Compassionate Leader: The Views of Nursing

    Leadership in health care is recognized as a necessity to ensure high-quality care, embody support for staff, and establish working environments that prioritize people over rules, regulations, and hierarchies (West et al., 2015).It is argued that compassionate leadership has a positive impact on "patient experience, staff engagement and organisational performance" (Bolden et al., 2019, p. 2).

  17. Leadership and management in mental health nursing

    Conclusion: Mental health nurses' leadership, management and transformational leadership are positively related in terms of effectiveness and nurses' skills. Implication for nursing management: It is important to consider mental health nurses' management as a form of leadership similar to or as a natural consequence of transformational ...

  18. The Role of Nursing Leadership in Dismantling Racism in Nursing: A Call

    Racism is a structural determinant of health that affects mental health outcomes in the United States and globally. Nursing leaders must respond to a call to action to address racism in nursing. The purpose of the current article is to present evidence-based, race-conscious strategies for nurses in leadership roles to identify, challenge, and ...

  19. Models of leadership and their implications for nursing practice

    The Ely inquiry into the systematic brutal treatment of patients in a Cardiff mental institution was the first formal inquiry into NHS failings (Department of Health and Social Security, 1969).Since that time there have been more than 100 inquiries with inadequate leadership persistently identified as a major concern (Sheard, 2015).National responses have included the NHS Healthcare Leadership ...

  20. The Impact of Transformational Leadership in the Nursing Work

    1.1. Rational. Healthcare systems are globally facing a crisis, with nurse shortage being a perennial issue. Nurses have the highest patient interaction, making nurse leaders central catalysts in positively influencing patient safety culture to reach safer patient outcomes [].At the same time, negative nursing work environments cultivate dissatisfied nurses who are likely to suffer from ...

  21. Effective Leadership and Teamwork in Nursing

    Machin, T (1998) Teamwork in community mental health, British Journal of Community Nursing, 3, 1, 17-24. Moiden, N (2003) A framework for leadership, Nursing Management, 9, 10, 19-23. Onyett, S, Pillinger, T and Muijen, M (1997) Job satisfaction and burnout among members of community mental health teams, Journal of Mental Health, 6, 1, 56-66.

  22. Leadership Styles and Management in Mental Health Care

    These can be given as follows: 1. Conducting interviews, using surveys and questionnaires to understand nurse attitudes and perceptions towards leadership styles. 2. Performing personality tests to identify traits correlating with the different leadership styles to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the workforce. 3.

  23. The role of the mental health nursing leadership

    holm a.l. & severinsson e. (2010) Journal of Nursing Management18, 463-471 The role of the mental health nursing leadership. Aim The aim of the present study was to illuminate what the mental health nursing (MHN) leader needs in order to develop her/his leadership role.. Background MHN leadership has tended to focus on the nature of the care provided rather than the development of the role.